Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Cebu Royal Plant

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 1

CEBU ROYAL PLANT (SAN MIGUEL CORPORATION), 

petitioner, vs.
THE HONORABLE DEPUTY MINISTER OF LABOR and RAMON PILONES, respondents.
G.R. No. L-58639 August 12, 1987

Facts:

Ramon Pilones was employed on a probationary period of employment for six (6) months. After said
period, he underwent medical examination for qualification as regular employee but the results showed
that he is suffering from PTB minimal. Consequently, he was informed of the termination of his
employment. The private respondent complained to the Ministry of Labor on his dismissal. The public
respondent, the Ministry of Labor through Deputy Minister required the company to reinstate the
separated employee and pay him back wages. The petitioner appeals the decision of the public
respondent, faulting him with grave abuse of discretion.

Issue:

Whether or not the private respondent was legally dismissed.

Ruling:

No. The court holds that the Ramon Pilones was already a regular employee when he was dismissed,
that is when he continued working four days after his probationary period ended. As such, he could validly
claim the security of tenure guaranteed to him by the Constitution and the Labor Code. Section 8, Rule I,
Book VI, of the Rules and Regulations Implementing the Labor Code states that, “Where the employee
suffers from a disease and his continued employment is prohibited by law or prejudicial to his health or
to the health of his co-employees, the employer shall not terminate his employment unless there is a
certification by a competent public health authority that the disease is of such nature or at such a stage
that it cannot be cured within a period of six (6) months even with proper medical treatment. If the
disease or ailment can be cured within the period, the employer shall not terminate the employee but
shall ask the employee to take a leave. The employer shall reinstate such employee to his former
position immediately upon the restoration of his normal health.” The record does not contain the
certification required by the above rule. The medical certificate offered by the petitioner came from its
own physician, who was not a "competent public health authority," and merely stated the employee's
disease, without more.

Therefore, the petition is dismissed with the modification that the backwages shall be limited to three
years only and the private respondent shall be reinstated only upon certification by a competent public
health authority that he is fit to return to work.

You might also like