Financial Reporting and Accounting Standards: Assignment Classification Table

CHAPTER 1
Financial Reporting and Accounting Standards
ASSIGNMENT CLASSIFICATION TABLE
Topics Questions Concepts for

Analysis
1. Global markets and financial reporting. 1, 2, 3, 4 4
2. Objective of financial reporting. 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 2, 3
3. Standard-setting organizations. 11, 12, 13, 14, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 8, 9,

15, 16, 17, 18 11
4. Financial reporting challenges. 19, 20, 21, 22, 3, 7, 8, 10, 11, 12

23, 24, 25
Copyright © 2020 Wiley Kieso, IFRS,4/e, Solutions Manual (For Instructor Use Only) 1-1
ASSIGNMENT CHARACTERISTICS TABLE
Level of Time
Item Description Difficulty (minutes)
CA1.1 IFRS and standard-setting. Simple 5–10

CA1.2 IFRS and standard-setting. Simple 5–10
CA1.3 Financial reporting and accounting standards. Simple 15–20
CA1.4 Financial accounting. Simple 15–20
CA1.5 Need for IASB. Simple 15–20
CA1.6 IASB role in standard-setting. Simple 15–20
CA1.7 Accounting numbers and the environment. Simple 10–15
CA1.8 Politicalization of IFRS. Complex 15–20
CA1.9 Models for setting IFRS. Simple 10–15
CA1.10 Economic consequences. Moderate 10–15
CA1.11 Rule-making Issues. Complex 20–25
CA1.12 Financial reporting pressures. Moderate 25–35
1-2 Copyright © 2020 Wiley Kieso, IFRS, 4/e, Solutions Manual (For Instructor Use Only)
ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS
1. World markets are becoming increasingly intertwined. The tremendous variety and volume of both
exported and imported goods indicates the extensive involvement in international trade. As a
result, the move towards adoption of international financial reporting standards has and will
continue in the future.
LO: 1, Bloom: K, Difficulty: Simple, Time: 3-5, AACSB: None, AICPA BB: None, AICPA FC: Reporting, AICPA PC: Communication
2. Financial accounting measures, classifies, and summarizes in report form those activities and that
information which relate to the enterprise as a whole for use by parties both internal and external
to a business enterprise. Managerial accounting also measures, classifies, and summarizes in
report form enterprise activities, but the communication is for the use of internal, managerial
parties, and relates more to subsystems of the entity. Managerial accounting is management
decision-oriented and directed more toward product line, division, and profit center reporting.
3. Financial statements generally refer to the four basic financial statements: statement of financial
position, statement of comprehensive income (or income statement), statement of cash flows, and
statement of changes in equity. Financial reporting is a broader concept; it includes the basic
financial statements and any other means of communicating financial and economic data to
interested external parties.
4. If a company’s financial performance is measured accurately, fairly, and on a timely basis, the right
managers and companies are able to attract investment capital. To provide unreliable and
irrelevant information leads to poor capital allocation which adversely affects the securities market.
5. A single set of high quality accounting standards ensures adequate comparability. Investors are
able to make better investment decisions if they receive financial information from a U.S. company
that is comparable to an international competitor.
6. The objective of general-purpose financial reporting is to provide financial information about the
reporting entity that is useful to present and potential equity investors, lenders, and other creditors
in making decisions about providing resources to the entity.
7. General-purpose financial statements provide financial reporting information to a wide variety of

users. To be cost effective in providing this information, general-purpose financial statements
provide at the least cost the most useful information possible.
8. Shareholders, creditors, suppliers, employees, and regulators all use general-purpose financial
statements. The primary user group is capital providers (shareholders and creditors).
9. The proprietary perspective is not considered appropriate because this perspective generally does
not reflect a realistic view of the financial reporting environment. Instead, the entity perspective
is adopted which is consistent with the present business environment where most companies
engaged in financial reporting have substance separate and distinct from their owners.
Questions Chapter 1 (Continued)
10. This statement is not correct. The objective of financial reporting is primarily to provide information
to investors interested in assessing the company’s ability to generate net cash inflows and
management’s ability to protect and enhance the capital providers’ investments. Financial
reporting should help investors assess the amounts, timing and uncertainty of prospective cash
inflows.
11. The two organizations involved in international standard-setting are IOSCO (International Organi-
zation of Securities Commissions) and the IASB (International Accounting Standards Board.) The
IOSCO does not set accounting standards, but ensures that the global markets can operate in an
efficient and effective manner. Conversely, the IASB’s mission is to develop a single set of high
quality, enforceable and global financial reporting standards (IFRSs) for general-purpose financial
statements.
12. IOSCO (International Organization of Securities Commissions) is an association of organizations

that regulate the world’s securities markets. Members are generally the main financial regulators
for a given country. IOSCO does not set accounting standards.
13. The mission of the IASB (International Accounting Standards Board) is to develop, in the public
interest, a single set of high quality, enforceable global international financial reporting standards
(IFRSs) for general-purpose financial statements.
14. The purpose of the Monitoring Board is to establish a link between accounting standard-setters
and those public authorities (such as IOSCO) that generally oversee accounting standard-setters.
This board also provides political legitimacy to the overall organization.
15. The IASB preliminary views are based on research and analysis conducted by the IASB staff.
IASB exposure drafts are issued after the Board evaluates research and public response to
preliminary views. IASB standards are issued after the Board evaluates responses to the exposure
draft.
16. IASB International Financial Reporting Standards are financial accounting standards issued by the
IASB and are referred to as International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). The IFRS
Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting sets forth fundamental objectives and concepts
that the Board uses in developing future standards of financial reporting. The intent of the
Conceptual Framework is to form a cohesive set of interrelated concepts that will serve as tools for
solving existing and emerging problems in a consistent manner.
17. In ranking from the most authoritative to least authoritative, International Financial Reporting
Standards are the most authoritative, followed by International Financial Reporting Standard
Interpretations and then the Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting.
18. The International Financial Reporting Standards Interpretations Committee (IFRIC) applies a
principles-based approach in providing interpretative guidance. The IFRIC issues interpretations
that cover newly identified financial reporting issues not specifically dealt with in IFRS, and issues
where conflicting interpretations have developed, or seem likely to develop in the absence of
authoritative guidance.
19. Some major challenges facing the accounting profession relate to the following items:
Nonfinancial measurement—how to report significant key performance measurements such as
customer satisfaction indexes, backlog information and reject rates on goods purchased.
Forward-looking information—how to report more future-oriented information.
Soft assets—how to report on intangible assets, such as market know-how, market
dominance, and well-trained employees.
Timeliness—how to report more real-time information.
20. The sources of pressure are innumerable, but the most intense and continuous pressure to
change or influence the development of IFRS come from individual companies, industry
associations, governmental agencies, practicing accountants, academicians, professional
accounting organizations, and investing public.
21. Economic consequences means the impact of accounting reports on the wealth positions of
issuers and users of financial information, and the decision-making behavior resulting from that
impact. In other words, accounting information impacts various users in many different ways which
leads to wealth transfers among these various groups.
If politics plays an important role in the development of accounting rules, the rules will be subject
to manipulation for the purpose of furthering whatever policy prevails at the moment. No matter
how well intentioned the rule-maker may be, if information is designed to indicate that investing in
a particular enterprise involves less risk than it actually does, or is designed to encourage invest-
ment in a particular segment of the economy, financial reporting will suffer an irreplaceable loss of
credibility.
22. No one particular proposal is expected in answer to this question. The students’ proposals,
however, should be defensible relative to the following criteria:
(1) The method must be efficient, responsive, and expeditious.
(2) The method must be free of bias and be above or insulated from pressure groups.
(3) The method must command widespread support if it does not have legislative authority.
(4) The method must produce sound yet practical accounting principles or standards.
The students’ proposals might take the form of alterations of the existing methodology, an accoun-
ting court (as proposed by Leonard Spacek), or governmental device.
23. Concern exists about fraudulent financial reporting because it can undermine the entire financial
reporting process. Failure to provide information to users that is accurate can lead to inappropriate
allocations of resources in our economy. In addition, failure to detect massive fraud can lead to
additional governmental oversight of the accounting profession.
24. The “expectations gap” is the difference between what people think accountants should be doing
and what accountants think they can do. It is a difficult gap to close. The accounting profession
recognizes it must play an important role in narrowing this gap. To meet the needs of society, the
profession is continuing its efforts in developing accounting standards, such as numerous
pronouncements issued by the IASB, to serve as guidelines for recording and processing business
transactions in the changing economic environment.
25. Accountants must perceive the moral dimensions of some situations because IFRS does not
define or cover all specific features that are to be reported in financial statements. In these
instances, accountants must choose among alternatives. These accounting choices influence
whether particular stakeholders may be harmed or benefited. Moral decision-making involves
awareness of potential harm or benefit and taking responsibility for the choices.
TIME AND PURPOSE OF CONCEPTS FOR ANALYSIS
CA 1.1 (Time 5–10 minutes)

Purpose—to provide the student with an opportunity to answer questions about IFRS and standard-
setting.

Purpose—to provide the student with an opportunity to answer questions about IFRS and standard-
setting.

Purpose—to provide the student with an opportunity to answer questions about financial reporting and
standard-setting.

Purpose—to provide the student with an opportunity to distinguish between financial accounting and
managerial accounting, identify major financial statements, and differentiate financial statements and
financial reporting.

Purpose—to provide the student with an opportunity to evaluate the viewpoint of removing mandatory
accounting rules and allowing each company to voluntarily disclose the information it desired.

Purpose—to provide the student with an opportunity to identify the sponsoring organization of the IASB,
the method by which the IASB arrives at a decision, and the types and the purposes of documents
issued by the IASB.

Purpose—to provide the student with an opportunity to describe how reported accounting numbers
might affect an individual’s perceptions and actions.

Purpose—to provide the student with an opportunity to focus on the types of organizations involved in
the rule making process, what impact accounting has on the environment, and the environment’s
influence on accounting.

Purpose—to provide the student with an opportunity to focus on what type of rule-making environment
exists. In addition, this CA explores why user groups are interested in the nature of IFRS and why some
groups wish to issue their own rules.

Purpose—to provide the student with the opportunity to discuss the role of government officials in
accounting rule-making.

Purpose—to provide the student with an opportunity to consider the ethical dimensions of
implementation of a new accounting pronouncement.

Purpose—to provide the student with a writing assignment concerning the ethical issues related to
meeting earnings targets.
SOLUTIONS TO CONCEPTS FOR ANALYSIS
CA 1.1
1. True.
2. False. Any company claiming compliance with IFRS must comply with all standards and inter-
pretations, including disclosure requirements.
3. False. The IFRS advisory council provides advice and counsel to the IASB on major policies and
technical issues. It is not a governmental body.
4. True.
5. False. The IASB has no government mandate and does follow a due process in issuing IFRS.
CA 1.2
1. False. The objective emphasizes an entity perspective, not a stewardship approach.
2. False. The objective of financial reporting is to provide financial information about the reporting
entity that is useful to present and potential equity investors, lenders, and other creditors in making
decisions in their capacity as capital providers, not preparing the financial statements.
3. False. International Accounting Standards were issued by the International Accounting Standards
Committee while International Financial Reporting Standards are issued by the IASB. Both have
authoritative support.
4. True.
LO: 2,3, Bloom: K, Difficulty: Simple, Time: 5-10, AACSB: None, AICPA BB: None, AICPA FC: Reporting, AICPA PC: Communication
CA 1.3
1. c. 2. d. 3. c. 4. d. 5. b. 6. a. 7. a. 8. b. 9. d. 10. b.
LO: 2,3, Bloom: K, Difficulty: Simple, Time: 15-20, AACSB: None, AICPA BB: None, AICPA FC: Reporting, AICPA PC: Communication
CA 1.4
(a) Financial accounting is the process that culminates in the preparation of financial reports relative
to the enterprise as a whole for use by parties both internal and external to the enterprise. In
contrast, managerial accounting is the process of identification, measurement, analysis, and
communication of financial information used by the management to plan, evaluate, and control
within an organization and to assure appropriate use of, and accountability for, its resources.
(b) The financial statements most frequently provided are the statement of financial position, the
statement of comprehensive income (or income statement), the statement of cash flows, and the
statement of changes in equity.
CA 1.4 (Continued)
(c) Financial statements are the principal means through which financial information is communicated
to those outside an enterprise. As indicated in (b), there are four major financial statements.
However, some financial information is better provided, or can be provided only, by means of
financial reporting other than formal financial statements. Financial reporting (other than financial
statements and related notes) may take various forms. Examples include the company president’s
letter or supplementary schedules in the corporate annual reports, prospectuses, reports filed with
govern-ment agencies, news releases, management’s forecasts, and descriptions of an
enterprise’s social or environmental impact.
CA 1.5
It is not appropriate to abandon mandatory accounting rules and allow each company to voluntarily
disclose the type of information it considered important. Without a coherent body of accounting theory
and standards, each accountant or enterprise would have to develop its own theory structure and set of
practices, and readers of financial statements would have to familiarize themselves with every
company’s peculiar accounting and reporting practices. As a result, it would be almost impossible to
prepare statements that could be compared.
In addition, voluntary disclosure may not be an efficient way of disseminating information. A company is
likely to disclose less information if it has the discretion to do so. Thus, the company can reduce its cost
of assembling and disseminating information. However, an investor wishing additional information has
to pay to receive additional information desired. Different investors may be interested in different types
of information. Since the company may not be equipped to provide the requested information, it would
have to spend additional resources to fulfill such needs; or the company may refuse to furnish such
information if it’s too costly to do so. As a result, investors may not get the desired information or they
may have to pay a significant amount of money for it. Furthermore, redundancy in gathering and
distributing information occurs when different investors ask for the same information at different points
in time. To the society as a whole, this would not be an efficient way of utilizing resources.
LO: 3, Bloom: AP, Difficulty: Simple, Time: 15-20, AACSB: None, AICPA BB: None, AICPA FC: Reporting, AICPA PC: Communication
CA 1.6
(a) The International Financial Reporting Standards Committee Foundation (The Foundation) is the
sponsoring organization of the IASB. The Foundation selects the members of the IASB and the
Advisory Council, funds their activities, and generally oversees the IASB’s activities.
The IASB follows a due process in establishing a typical International Financial Reporting
Standard. The following steps are usually taken: (1) A topic or project is identified and placed on
the Board’s agenda. (2) Research and analysis are conducted by the IASB and a preliminary
views document is drafted and released. (3) A public hearing is often held. (4) The Board analyzes
and evaluates the public response and issues an exposure draft. (5) The Board studies the
exposure draft in relation to the public responses, revises the draft if necessary, gives the revised
draft final consideration and votes on issuance of an IFRS. The passage of a new accounting
standard in the form of an IASB Standard requires the support of eight of the fourteen Board
members.
(b) The IASB issues three major types of pronouncements: International Financial Reporting
Standards, conceptual framework for financial reporting, and International Financial Reporting
Standards Interpretations. Financial reporting standards issued by the IASB are referred to as
International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS).
CA 1.6 (Continued)
The International Accounting Standards Committee (IASB predecessor) issued a document
entitled “Framework for the Preparation and Presentation of Financial Statements.” This framework
sets forth fundamental objectives and concepts that the Board uses in developing future standards
of financial reporting. The intent of the document is to form a cohesive set of interrelated concepts,
a conceptual framework, that will serve as tools for solving existing and emerging problems in a
consistent manner.
Interpretations issued by the International Financial Reporting Standards Interpretations

Committee (The Interpretations Committee) are also considered authoritative and cover (1) newly
identified financial reporting issues not specifically dealt with in IFRS, and (2) issues where
unsatisfactory or conflicting interpretations have developed, or seem likely to develop, in the
absence of authoritative guidance.
The Interpretations Committee can address controversial accounting problems as they arise. It
determines whether it can quickly resolve them, or whether to involve the IASB in solving them.
The IASB will hopefully work on more pervasive long-term problems, while the Interpretations
Committee deals with short-term emerging issues.
CA 1.7
Accounting numbers affect investing decisions. Investors, for example, use the financial statements of
different companies to enhance their understanding of each company’s financial strength and operating
results. Because these statements follow international accounting standards, investors can make
meaningful comparisons of different financial statements to assist their investment decisions.
Accounting numbers also influence creditors’ decisions. A commercial bank usually looks into a
company’s financial statements and past credit history before deciding whether to grant a loan and in
what amount. The financial statements provide a fair picture of the company’s financial strength (for
example, short-term liquidity and long-term solvency) and operating performance for the current period
and over a period of time. The information is essential for the bank to ensure that the loan is safe and
sound.
CA 1.8
(a) Arguments for politicalization of the accounting standard-setting process:
1. Accounting depends in large part on public confidence for its success. Consequently, the
critical issues are not solely technical, so all those having a bona fide interest in the output of
accounting should have some influence on that output.
2. There are numerous conflicts between the various interest groups. In the face of this, compro-
mise is necessary, particularly since the critical issues in accounting are value judgments, not
the type which are solvable, as we have traditionally assumed, using deterministic models.
Only in this way (reasonable compromise) will the financial community have confidence in the
fairness and objectivity of accounting standard-setting.
3. Over the years, accountants have been unable to establish, on the basis of technical accoun-
ting elements, standards which would bring about the desired uniformity and acceptability. This
inability itself indicates standard-setting is primarily consensual in nature.
CA 1.8 (Continued)
4. The public accounting profession made rules which business enterprises and individuals
“had” to follow. For many years, these businesses and individuals had little say as to what the
standards would be, in spite of the fact that their economic well-being was influenced to a
substantial degree by those standards. It is only natural that they would try to influence or
control the factors that determine their economic well-being.
(b) Arguments against the politicization of the accounting standard-setting process:

1. Many accountants feel that accounting is primarily technical in nature. Consequently, they feel
that substantive, basic research by objective, independent and fair-minded researchers
ultimately will result in the best solutions to critical issues, such as the concepts of income and
capital, even if it is accepted that there isn’t necessarily a single “right” solution.
2. Even if it is accepted that there are no “absolute truths” as far as critical issues are concerned,
many feel that professional accountants, taking into account the diverse interests of the
various groups using accounting information, are in the best position, because of their
independence, education, training, and objectivity, to decide what international financial
reporting standards ought to be.
3. The complex situations that arise in the business world require that trained accountants
develop the appropriate reporting standards.
4. The use of consensus to develop reporting standards would decrease the professional status
of the accountant.
5. This approach would lead to “lobbying” by various parties to influence the establishment of
reporting standards.
LO: 3, 4, Bloom: K, Difficulty: Complex, Time: 15-20, AACSB: None, AICPA BB: None, AICPA FC: Reporting, AICPA PC: Communication
CA 1.9
(a) Most believe the IASB process is a public private mixed approach. In many respects, the IASB is a
quasi-governmental agency in that its pronouncements are required to be followed in some
jurisdictions. For example, all public European companies are required to use IASB standards
when preparing financial statements. In fact, both the FASB and the IASB believe that IFRS has
the best potential to provide a common platform on which companies can report and investors can
compare financial information. The purely political approach is used in France and West Germany.
The private, professional approach is employed in Australia, Canada, and the United Kingdom.
(b) Publicly reported accounting numbers influence the distribution of scarce resources. Resources
are channeled where needed at returns commensurate with perceived risk. Thus, reported
accounting numbers have economic effects in that resources are transferred among entities and
individuals as a consequence of these numbers. It is not surprising then that individuals affected
by these numbers will be extremely interested in any proposed changes in the financial reporting
environment.
CA 1.10
President Sarkozy put pressure on the IASB to craft fair value standards that favor banks.
However, by introducing politics into the standard-setting process will likely lead to the following
consequences:
1. Too many alternatives.
2. Lack of clarity that will lead to inconsistent application.
3. Lack of disclosure that reduces transparency.
4. Not comprehensive in scope.
CA 1.10 (Continued)
When the resulting standards have these attributes, they will be of lower quality and the credibility
of the standard-setting process will be questioned. At the extreme, market participants will have
less confidence in accounting information and capital markets will be less liquid—cost of capital
will be higher. Another indication of the problem of government intervention is shown in the
accounting standards used by some countries around the world. Completeness and transparency
of information needed by investors and creditors is not available in order to meet or achieve other
objectives. In the fair value case, the IASB did respond by accelerating its process to develop a
new standard, which provided some exceptions to the fair value accounting that benefited some
banks and insurance companies.
LO: 4, Bloom: AP, Difficulty: Moderate, Time: 10-15, AACSB: None, AICPA BB: None, AICPA FC: Reporting, AICPA PC: Communication
CA 1.11
(a) Inclusion or omission of information that materially affects net income harms particular
stakeholders. Accountants must recognize that their decision to implement (or delay) reporting
requirements will have immediate consequences for some stakeholders.
(b) Yes. Because the IASB rule results in a fairer representation, it should be implemented as soon as
possible—regardless of its impact on net income.
(c) The controller’s responsibility is to provide financial statements that present fairly the financial
condition of the company. By advocating early implementation, Weller fulfills this task.
(d) Potential lenders and investors, who read the financial statements and rely on their fair
representation of the financial condition of the company, have the most to gain by early
implementation—they would be most directly harmed by deferral of implementation. At the same
time, a shareholder who is considering the sale of shares may be harmed by early implementation
that lowers net income (and may lower the value of the shares). If employee bonuses are based
on the reported income number, the employees could receive lower bonuses with early
implementation.
LO: 3, 4, Bloom: AP, Difficulty: Complex, Time: 20-25, AACSB: Ethics, AICPA BB: None, AICPA FC: Reporting, AICPA PC Communication, Ethical Conduct
CA 1.12
(a) The ethical issue in this case relates to making questionable entries to meet expected earnings
forecasts. As indicated in this chapter, businesses’ concentration on “maximizing the bottom line,”
“facing the challenges of competition,” and “stressing short-term results” places accountants in an
environment of conflict and pressure.
(b) Given that Normand has pleaded guilty, he certainly acted improperly. Doing the right thing,
making the right decision, is not always easy. Right is not always obvious, and the pressures to
“bend the rules,” “to play the game,” or “to just ignore it” can be considerable.
(c) No doubt, Normand was in a difficult position. I am sure that he was concerned that if he failed to
go along, it would affect his job performance negatively or that he might be terminated. These job
pressures, time pressures, and peer pressures often lead individuals astray. Can it happen to you?
One individual noted that at a seminar on ethics sponsored by the CMA Society of Southern
California, attendees were asked if they had ever been pressured to make questionable entries.
This individual noted that to the best of his recollection, everybody raised a hand, and more than
one had eventually chosen to resign.
(d) Major stakeholders are: (1) Troy Normand, (2) present and potential shareholders and creditors of
WorldCom, (3) employees, and (4) family. Recognize that WorldCom is one of the largest
bankruptcies in United States history, so many individuals are affected.
LO: 4, Bloom: AP, Difficulty: Moderate, Time: 25-35, AACSB: Ethics, AICPA BB: None, AICPA FC: Reporting, AICPA PC: Communication, Ethical Conduct
FINANCIAL REPORTING PROBLEM
(a) The two organizations involved in international standard-setting are

International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) and the
International Accounting Standards Board (IASB).
(b) Different authoritative literature pertaining to methods of recording

accounting transactions exists today. Some authoritative literature has
received more support from the profession than other literature. The
literature that has substantial authoritative support is the one most
supported by the profession and should be followed when recording
accounting transactions. These standards and procedures are called
International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS).
FINANCIAL REPORTING CASE
(a) The International Accounting Standards Board is an independent, pri-

vately-funded accounting standards-setter based in London, UK. The
Board is committed to developing, in the public interest, a single set of
high quality, enforceable and global accounting standards that require
transparent and comparable information in general-purpose financial
statements. In addition, the Board cooperates with national accounting
standards setters to achieve convergence in accounting standards
around the world.
(b) In summary, the following groups might benefit from the use of Inter-
national Accounting Standards:
 Investors, investment analysts and stockbrokers: to facilitate inter-
national comparisons for investment decisions.
 Credit grantors: for similar reasons to bullet point above.
 Multinational companies: as preparers, investors, appraisers of pro-
ducts or staff, and as movers of staff around the globe; also, as
raisers of finance on international markets (this also applies to some
com-panies that are not multinationals).
 Governments: as tax collectors and hosts of multinationals; also
interested are securities markets regulators and governmental and
nongovernmental rule makers.
(c) The fundamental argument against convergence is that, to the extent

that international differences in accounting practices result from
under-lying economic, legal, social, and other environmental factors,
convergence may not be justified. Different accounting has grown up
to serve the different needs of different users; this might suggest that
the existing accounting practice is “correct” for a given nation and
should not be changed merely to simplify the work of multinational
companies or auditors. There does seem to be strength in this point
particularly for smaller companies with no significant multinational
activities or connections. To impose upon a small, private family-
company in Luxembourg lavish disclosure requirements and the need
to report a “true and fair” view may be an expensive and unnecessary
piece of convergence.
FINANCIAL REPORTING CASE (Continued)
The most obvious obstacle to convergence is the sheer size and deep
rootedness of the differences in accounting. These differences have
grown up over the previous century because of differences in users,
legal systems, and so on. Thus, the differences are structural rather
than cosmetic, and require revolutionary action to remove them.
LO: 1,2,3,4, Bloom: K, Difficulty: Moderate, Time: 20-25, AACSB: None, AICPA BB: None, AICPA FC: Reporting, AICPA PC: Communication
ACCOUNTING, ANALYSIS AND PRINCIPLES
ACCOUNTING
(a) The requirements will depend on the jurisdiction in which they intend
to sell the securities. The International Accounting Standards Board
(IASB) issues International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) which
are used on most foreign exchanges. The IASB standards require
companies to prepare a full set of financial statements and related
disclosures so investors can evaluate and compare investments.
(b) The two entities that are primarily responsible for establishing IFRS are
IOSCO (International Organization of Securities Commissions) and the
IASB (International Accounting Standards Board).
The IOSCO does not set accounting standards, but ensures that the
global markets can operate in an efficient and effective manner.
Conversely, the IASB’s mission is to develop a single set of high
quality, enforceable and global International Financial Reporting
Standards (IFRSs) for general-purpose financial statements.
ANALYSIS
(a) Decision-usefulness involves providing investors interested in

financial reporting information that is useful for making decisions.
(b) The financial statements provide information on company performance

(statement of comprehensive income or income statement), financial
position – assets owned and liabilities incurred (statement of financial
position) and cash flows (statement of cash flows) and statement of
changes in equity. Investors and creditors use this information to form
their own expectations about a company’s future cash flows. These
assessments are the basis of the decision about an investment in the
company.
ACCOUNTING, ANALYSIS AND PRINCIPLES (Continued)
PRINCIPLES
The hierarchy of IFRS to determine what recognition, valuation, and

disclosure requirements should be used are:
1. International Financial Reporting Standards;
2. International Accounting Standards; and
3. Interpretations from the International Financial Reporting Standards
Interpretations Committee.
Any company indicating that it is preparing its financial statements in

conformity with IFRS must use these standards and interpretations, as
appropriate.
LO: 1,2,3,4, Bloom: K, Difficulty: Moderate, Time: 20-25, AACSB: None, AICPA BB: None, AICPA FC: Reporting, AICPA PC: Communication
RESEARCH CASE
The following responses are drawn from the IFRS Conceptual Framework
(a) According the Conceptual Framework (2018, par. 1.2) The objective of
general purpose financial reporting is to provide financial information
about the reporting entity that is useful to existing and potential
investors, lenders and other creditors in making decisions relating to
providing resources to the entity. Those decisions involve decisions
about:
(a) buying, selling or holding equity and debt instruments;
(b) providing or settling loans and other forms of credit; or
(c) exercising rights to vote on, or otherwise influence, management’s
actions that affect the use of the entity’s economic resources.
(b) According to Chapter 7 of the Conceptual Framework, presentation

and disclosure objectives and principles (paras 4 to 6):
7.4 To facilitate effective communication of information in financial
statements, when developing presentation and disclosure
requirements in Standards a balance is needed between:
(a) giving entities the flexibility to provide relevant information
that faithfully represents the entity’s assets, liabilities,
equity, income and expenses; and
(b) requiring information that is comparable, both from period
to period for a reporting entity and in a single reporting
period across entities.
7.5 Including presentation and disclosure objectives in Standards
supports effective communication in financial statements
because such objectives help entities to identify useful
information and to decide how to communicate that information
in the most effective manner.
7.6 Effective communication in financial statements is also
supported by considering the following principles:
(a) entity-specific information is more useful than standardized
descriptions, sometimes referred to as boilerplate’; and
(b) duplication of information in different parts of the financial
statements is usually unnecessary and can make financial
statements less understandable.
RESEARCH CASE (Continued)
(c) According to the Conceptual Framework (Chapter 1, paras. 6 to 10):
1.6 … general purpose financial reports do not and cannot provide
all of the information that existing and potential investors,
lenders and other creditors need. Those users need to consider
pertinent information from other sources, for example, general
economic conditions and expectations, political events and
political climate, and industry and company outlooks.
1.7 General purpose financial reports are not designed to show the
value of a reporting entity; but they provide information to help
existing and potential investors, lenders and other creditors to
estimate the value of the reporting entity.
1.8 Individual primary users have different, and possibly conflicting,
information needs and desires. The Board, in developing
Standards, will seek to provide the information set that will meet
the needs of the maximum number of primary users. However,
focusing on common information needs does not prevent the
reporting entity from including additional information that is
most useful to a particular subset of primary users.
1.9 The management of a reporting entity is also interested in
financial information about the entity. However, management
need not rely on general purpose financial reports because it is
able to obtain the financial information it needs internally.
1.10 Other parties, such as regulators and members of the public
other than investors, lenders and other creditors, may also find
general purpose financial reports useful. However, those reports
are not primarily directed to these other groups.
In addition, regarding Information about use of the entity’s economic
resources:
1.22 Information about how efficiently and effectively the reporting
entity’s management has discharged its responsibilities to use
the entity’s economic resources helps users to assess
management’s stewardship of those resources. Such information
is also useful for predicting how efficiently and effectively
management will use the entity’s economic resources in future
periods. Hence, it can be useful for assessing the entity’s
prospects for future net cash inflows.
1.23 Examples of management’s responsibilities to use the entity’s
economic resources include protecting those resources from
unfavourable effects of economic factors, such as price and
technological changes, and ensuring that the entity complies
with applicable laws, regulations and contractual provisions.
LO: 2,4, Bloom: K, Difficulty: Complex, Time: 25-30, AACSB: None, AICPA BB: None, AICPA FC: Reporting, AICPA PC: Communication
GAAP CONCEPTS AND APPLICATION
GAAP1.1 Generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) for U.S.

companies are developed by the Financial Accounting
Standards Board (FASB). The FASB is a private organization.
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
exercises oversight over the actions of the FASB.
GAAP1.2 Differences between U.S. GAAP and IFRS should not be

surprising because standard-setters have developed standards
in response to different user needs. In some countries, the
primary users of financial statements are private investors. In
others, the primary users are tax authorities or central
government planners. In the United States, investors and
creditors have driven accounting standard formulation.

Financial Reporting and Accounting Standards: Assignment Classification Table

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Financial Reporting and Accounting Standards: Assignment Classification Table

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Financial Reporting and Accounting Standards: Assignment Classification Table

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

CHAPTER 1

Financial Reporting and Accounting Standards

ASSIGNMENT CLASSIFICATION TABLE

Topics Questions Concepts for

1. Global markets and financial reporting. 1, 2, 3, 4 4

2. Objective of financial reporting. 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 2, 3

3. Standard-setting organizations. 11, 12, 13, 14, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 8, 9,

4. Financial reporting challenges. 19, 20, 21, 22, 3, 7, 8, 10, 11, 12

CA1.1 IFRS and standard-setting. Simple 5–10

7. General-purpose financial statements provide financial reporting information to a wide variety of

12. IOSCO (International Organization of Securities Commissions) is an association of organizations

CA 1.1 (Time 5–10 minutes)

CA 1.2 (Time 5–10 minutes)

CA 1.3 (Time 15–20 minutes)

CA 1.4 (Time 15–20 minutes)

CA 1.5 (Time 15–20 minutes)

CA 1.6 (Time 15–20 minutes)

CA 1.7 (Time 10–15 minutes)

CA 1.8 (Time 15–20 minutes)

CA 1.9 (Time 10–15 minutes)

CA 1.10 (Time 10–15 minutes)

CA 1.11 (Time 20–25 minutes)

CA 1.12 (Time 25–35 minutes)

Interpretations issued by the International Financial Reporting Standards Interpretations

(b) Arguments against the politicization of the accounting standard-setting process:

(a) The two organizations involved in international standard-setting are

(b) Different authoritative literature pertaining to methods of recording

(a) The International Accounting Standards Board is an independent, pri-

(c) The fundamental argument against convergence is that, to the extent

(a) Decision-usefulness involves providing investors interested in

(b) The financial statements provide information on company performance

The hierarchy of IFRS to determine what recognition, valuation, and

Any company indicating that it is preparing its financial statements in

(b) According to Chapter 7 of the Conceptual Framework, presentation

GAAP1.1 Generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) for U.S.

GAAP1.2 Differences between U.S. GAAP and IFRS should not be

You might also like