Office Performance Commitment and Review Form (Opcrf) : Reynaldo Vega Magan Nimfa R. Lago, PHD, Ceso Vi School Principal 1

OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)
Name of Employee: REYNALDO VEGA MAGAN Name of Rater: NIMFA R. LAGO, PhD, CESO VI
Position: School Principal 1 Position: Assistant Schools Division Superintendent
Review Period: Date of Review:
School/District/Division: Department of Education/Misamis Oriental
TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RESULTS
RATING
SCORE
WEIGHT
MFO's KRA's OBJECTIVES TIMELINE PER KRA
QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS Q E T AVE.
● 1. Implemented Basic 91-100% or of the mentioned 91-100% or 5 of the mentioned 91-100% or 5 of the mentioned
programs and activities were programs and activities were programs and activities were
Education Learning Continuity implemented implemented implemented
Plan - (BE-LCP) Goals, 5
Objectives and target during
the rating period.
BASIC KRA 1: a. 81-90% or 5 of the mentioned 81-90% or 5 of the mentioned 81-90% or 5 of the mentioned
Organized BE-LCP Team programs and activities were programs and activities were programs and activities were
EDUCATION INSTRUCTIONAL 4 implemented implemented implemented
SERVICES LEADERSHIP b. Information Dessimination
(40%) to stakeholders, NGO's, LGU
and School Community thru 71-80% or 5 of the mentioned 71-80% or 5 of the mentioned 71-80% or 5 of the mentioned
online virtual and on-site programs and activities were programs and activities were programs and activities were
Year Round 10% 3 implemented implemented implemented 5 5 5 5.00 5.00 0.5
modalities and face to face with
limited number of stakeholders.
c. 61-70% or 5 of the mentioned 61-70% or 5 of the mentioned 61-70% or 5 of the mentioned
Organized and facilitated programs and activities were programs and activities were programs and activities were
MT/Teachers to lead in the 2 implemented implemented implemented
checking of modules before
printing. 51-60% or 5 of the mentioned 51-60% or 5 of the mentioned 51-60% or 5 of the mentioned
d. Formulated programs and activities were programs and activities were programs and activities were
Formative Assessment 1 implemented implemented implemented
● Crafted and conducted monthly 100% crafted monthly 105% and above of the Submitted instructional
Instructional Supervision instructional supervisory plans supervisory plans were supervisory plan and
through limited face to face or and were implemented/achieved implemented in a month accomplishment report and
5
virtually as planned signed by PSDS/CID Chief before
the deadline
Year - Round
10% 5 5 5 5.00 0.5
2021
EDUCATION INSTRUCTIONAL
SERVICES LEADERSHIP
(40%)

● Crafted and conducted monthly TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION
Instructional Supervision
through limited face to face or PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RESULTS
RATING
SCORE
virtually WEIGHT
85% crafted monthly instructional 85% of the supervisory plans Submitted instructional
supervisory plans and were were implemented in a month supervisory plan and
4 implemented/achieved as accomplishment report and
planned signed by PSDS/CID Chief on the
deadline
Year - Round supervisory plans and were were implemented in a month supervisory plan and
10%
3 implemented/achieved as accomplishment report a day 5 5 5 5.00 0.5
2021
planned after the deadline
2 implemented/achieved as accomplishment report 3days
1 implemented/achieved as accomplishment report 5 days
● Monitored regularly Weekly 100% of the teachers submitted 100% of the Weekly Home
Home Learning Plan (WHLP), neat and accurate Weekly Home Learning Plan (WHLP), Thinking
Thinking Log, printing and 5 Learning Plan (WHLP), Thinking Log, Modules were inspected
distribution of Modules Log, Modules. As reflected in a /checked before the scheduled
logbook or monitoring sheet. time/date
85-99% of the teachers submitted 100% of the Weekly Home
neat and accurate Weekly Home Learning Plan (WHLP), Thinking
4 Learning Plan (WHLP), Thinking Log, Modules were inspected
Log, Modules.as reflected in a /checked on the scheduled
logbook or monitoring sheet time/date
Year - Round 10% 5 5 5 5.00 0.5


● Monitored regularly Weekly
Home Learning Plan (WHLP),
Thinking Log, printing and
distribution of Modules TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION
RATING
SCORE
WEIGHT

Year - Round 10% 3 Learning Plan (WHLP), Thinking Log, Modules were inspected 5 5 5 5.00 0.5
Log, Modules. As refelcted in a /checked one day after the
logbook or monitoring sheet scheduled time/date
2 Learning Plan (WHLP), Thinking Log, Modules were inspected
Log, Modules.as reflected in a /checked 2days after the
logbook or monitoring sheet scheduled time/date
54% and below of the teachers 100% of theWeekly Home
submitted neat and accurate Learning Plan (WHLP), Thinking
1 Weekly Home Learning Plan Log, Modules were inspected
(WHLP), Thinking Log, Modules /checked 3 days after the
as reflected in a logbook or scheduled time/date
● Monitored teachers upkeep of 95-100%
monitoringofsheet.
the learners records Implemented 5 appropriate
Implemented the appropriate
students records using the were analyzed and utilized result intervention on the anallyzed
5 intervention 1 month after having
learner's portfolios and through for improvement result
the analyzed result
virtual or face to face observing
IATF law 85-94% of the learners records Implemented 4 appropriate Implemented the appropriate
4 were analyzed and utilized result intervention on the anallyzed intervention 2 month after having
for improvement result the analyzed result
75-84% of the learners records Implemented 3 appropriate
were analyzed and utilized result intervention on the anallyzed Implemented the appropriate
Year Round 10% 5 5 5 5.00 0.5
3
for improvement result intervention 3 month after having
the analyzed result
60-74 % of the learners records Implemented 2 appropriate Implemented the appropriate

2 were analyzed and utilized result intervention on the anallyzed intervention 4 month after having
for improvement result the analyzed result
59%and below of the learners Implemented 1appropriate Implemented the appropriate
1 records were analyzed and intervention on the anallyzed intervention 5 month after having
utilized result for improvement result the analyzed result
RATING
SCORE
WEIGHT
● Provided a safe and child 100% of the classrooms were 0% School Casualties during 100% of the classrooms were
friendly learning environment painted,lighted,well ventilated Typhoons, school events and painted,lighted,well ventilated
for learners and teachers ,structured and secured as others through school-based ,structured and secured as
5
following IATF law and health supported by pictures DRRM supported by pictures 1month
protocols before the opening of classes
KRA 2: 85-99% of the classrooms were 10% School Casualties during 100% of the classrooms were
LEARNING painted,lighted,well ventilated Typhoons, school events and painted,lighted,well ventilated
ENVIRONMENT 4
,structured and secured as others through school-based ,structured and secured as
supported by pictures DRRM supported by pictures during the
(15%) opening of classes
70-84% of the classrooms were 20% School Casualties during 100% of the classrooms were
painted,lighted,well ventilated Typhoons, school events and painted,lighted,well ventilated
,structured and secured as others through school-based ,structured and secured as
Year Round 5% 3 5 5 5 5.00 0.25
supported by pictures DRRM supported by pictures 2months
after the opening of classes
55-69% of the classrooms were 30% School Casualties during 100% of the classrooms were
painted,lighted,well ventilated Typhoons, school events and painted,lighted,well ventilated
2 ,structured and secured as others through school-based ,structured and secured as
supported by pictures DRRM supported by pictures 3months
54% and below of the classrooms 40% School Casualties during 100% of the classrooms were
were painted,lighted,well Typhoons, school events and painted,lighted,well ventilated
ventilated ,structured and others through school-based ,structured and secured as
1 secured as supported by pictures DRRM supported by pictures 4month
ENVIRONMENT
(15%)

RATING
SCORE
WEIGHT
● Evaluated the school plant, Submitted valid,accurate and Conducted a bi- monthly School- Submitted valid,accurate and
physical facilities, safety and authentic physical plant inventory based DRRM authentic physical plant inventory
sufficiency with the assistance 5 and design proposals/ before the deadline supported by
of specialist through online intervention the transmital
platform or limited f2f
Submitted valid and accurate Conducted a monthly School- Submitted valid,accurate and
physical plant inventory and based DRRM authentic physical plant inventory
4 design proposals/ intervention on the deadline supported by the
transmital
Submitted valid,accurate but not Conducted a quarterly School- Submitted valid,accurate and
authentic physical plant inventory based DRRM authentic physical plant inventory
3 and design proposals/ 1 day after the deadline
Year Round 5% intervention supported by the transmital 5 5 5 5.00 0.25
Submitted not accurate and not Conducted twice a year School- Submitted valid,accurate and
authentic physical plant inventory based DRRM authentic physical plant inventory
2 and without proposals/ 2 days after the deadline
intervention supported by the transmital
Submitted physical plant Conducted once a year School- Submitted valid,accurate and
inventory without based DRRM authentic physical plant inventory
1 proposal/intervention 3 days after the deadline
supported by the transmital
BASIC ● Formulated intervention Formulated 4 or more intervention Formulated and Conducted 4 or Formulated the intervention
EDUCATION program to enhance the 5 programs based from the SWOT more interventions programs programs based from the SWOT
SERVICES strength, weakness, attached based on SWOT attached. attached 1 month after
opportunities, threats (SWOT)
of the school and support
BELCP
Year Round 5% 5 5 5 5.00 0.25


BASIC ● Formulated intervention
RATING
SCORE
WEIGHT
MFO's
EDUCATION KRA's programOBJECTIVES
to enhance the TIMELINE PER KRA
strength, weakness, QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS Q E T AVE.
SERVICES
opportunities, threats (SWOT)
of the school and support Formulated 3 or more intervention Formulated and Conducted 3 Formulated the intervention
BELCP 4 programs based from the SWOT interventions programs based on programs based from the SWOT
attached SWOT attached. attached 2 months after
Formulated 2 or more intervention Formulated and Conducted 2 Formulated the intervention
Year Round 5% 3 programs based from the SWOT interventions programs based on programs based from the SWOT 5 5 5 5.00 0.25
Formulated 1 or more intervention Formulated and Conducted 1 Formulated the intervention

programs based from the SWOT intervention program based on programs based from the SWOT
2
attached SWOT attached. attached 4months after
Formulated no intervention Formulated and Conducted no Formulated the intervention

1 programs based from the SWOT intervention program based on programs based from the SWOT
● Organized and conducted Conducted 4 or more school Conducted 4 or more school Conducted 4 or more school
School-based In-Service based trainings/LAC Sessions based trainings/LAC Sessions based trainings/LAC Sessions
Training/LAC Sessions relevant within a year supported with within a year supported with within a year supported with
to the LDM virtually or face to 5 training matrix,attendance and training matrix,attendance and training matrix,attendance and
face considering the mandated pictures pictures using other funds. pictures before INSET Schedule
health protocols and IATF law
KRA 3: Conducted 3 school based Conducted 3 school based Conducted 4 or more school
HUMAN RESOURCE trainings/LAC Sessions within a trainings/LAC Sessions within a based trainings/LAC Sessions
MANAGEMENT AND year supported with training year supported with training within a year supported with
DEVELOPMENT matrix,attendance and pictures matrix,attendance and pictures training matrix,attendance and
4 using other funds pictures during October INSET
(15%)
Year Round 4% 5 5 5 5.00 0.2

● Organized and conducted
School-based In-ServiceOFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)
Training/LAC Sessions relevant
Name of Employee: REYNALDO
to the LDM virtually VEGA
or face to MAGAN Name of Rater: NIMFA R. LAGO, PhD, CESO VI
Position: face considering
School Principal the mandated
1 Position: Assistant Schools Division Superintendent
health protocols and IATF law

KRA 3:
HUMAN RESOURCE
MANAGEMENT AND
DEVELOPMENT TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION
(15%) PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RESULTS
RATING
SCORE
WEIGHT
Year Round 4% 5 5 5 5.00 0.2
Conducted 2 school based Conducted 2 school based Conducted 4 or more school
trainings/LAC Sessions within a trainings/LAC Sessions within a based trainings/LAC Sessions
3 year supported with training year supported with training within a year supported with
matrix,attendance and pictures matrix,attendance and pictures training matrix,attendance and
using other funds pictures during summer INSET
Conducted 1 school based Conducted 1 school based
trainings/LAC Sessions within a trainings/LAC Sessions within a
2 year supported with training year supported with training
matrix,attendance and pictures matrix,attendance and pictures
using other funds.
Organized but Conducted no Conducted no school based

school based trainings/LAC trainings/LAC Sessions within a
1 Sessions within a year. year using other funds.
● Assigned teachers where they Assigned 100% of the teachers to Performs 3 ancillary services on
best fit to teach the areas,grades they best fit top of the regular teaching loads Printed and submitted hard
(grades/learning areas, special 5 within a year supported by with high mastery level copies of the approved class
assignments) and to print, approved class program program before deadline
segregate, distribute and
retrieve the modules or on Assigned 85-99% of the teachers Performs 2 ancillary services on
online class/platform to the areas,grades they best fit top of the regular teaching loads Printed and submitted hard
4 within a year supported by with high mastery level copies of the approved class
approved class program program on the deadline
Assigned 70-84% of the teachers Performs 1 ancillary service on

to the areas,grades they best fit top of the regular teaching loads Printed and submitted hard
Year Round 4% 3 within a year supported by with high mastery level copies of the approved class 5 5 5 5.00 0.2
approved class program program 1 day after the deadline
● Assigned teachers where they
best fit to teach
(grades/learning areas, special
Name of Employee: REYNALDO VEGA MAGAN
assignments) and to print, Name of Rater: NIMFA R. LAGO, PhD, CESO VI
Position: School
segregate,Principal
distribute and1 Position: Assistant Schools Division Superintendent
Review Period: retrieve the modules or on Date of Review:
online class/platform
RATING
SCORE
Year Round 4%
WEIGHT 5 5 5 5.00 0.2
Assigned 55- 69% of the Performs regular teaching loads

teachers to the areas,grades they with high mastery level with high Printed and submitted hard
copies of the approved class
2 best fit within a year supported by mastery level
approved class program program 2-3 days after the
deadline
Assigned 54% and below of the Performs regular teaching loads

teachers to the areas,grades they with average mastery level Printed and submitted hard
copies of the approved class
1 best fit within a year supported by
approved class program program 4-5 days after the
deadline
● Recommended and 100% of the teachers were Submitted recommendations

coordinated virtually or limited recommended for before the dealine
face to face the services for the 5 promotion/training /scholarship in
holistic development of school a year
personnel and learners
85-99 % of the teachers were Submitted recommendations on
considering the health
protocols recommended for the the dealine
4
promotion/training /scholarship in
a year
70-84% of the teachers were Submitted recommendations 1
recommended for day after the dealine
Year Round 4% 3 5 5 5 5.00 0.2
promotion/training /scholarship in
a year
55-69% of the teachers were Submitted recommendations 2
recommended for days after the dealine
2 promotion/training /scholarship in
a year
● Recommended and
coordinated virtually or limited
OFFICE
face to face the services for the PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)
holistic development of school
Name of Employee: REYNALDO VEGA MAGAN
personnel and learners Name of Rater: NIMFA R. LAGO, PhD, CESO VI
Position: considering the health
School Principal 1 Position: Assistant Schools Division Superintendent
protocols
Year Round 4% 5 5 5 5.00 0.2

RATING
SCORE
WEIGHT
54% and below of the teachers Submitted recommendations 3

were recommended for days after the dealine
1 promotion/training /scholarship in
a year
● Initiated and supervised the 100% of the teachers have Complied complete ,neat ,
compilation of teacher's 5 complete,neat ,accurate and accurate and authentic teacher's
professional documents in their authentic portfolio in a year portfolio before March 2017
portfolios observing health
protocols 85-99% of the teachers have Complied complete ,neat ,
4 complete,neat, auhentic and accurate and authentic teacher's
accurate portfolio in a year portfolio first week of March 2017
75-84% of the teachers have Complied complete ,neat ,

complete,neat ,accurate and accurate and authentic teacher's
Year Round 3% 3 authentic portfolio in a year 5 5 5 5.00 0.15
portfolio second week of March
2017
55-69% of the teachers have Complied complete ,neat ,
2 complete,neat ,accurate and accurate and authentic teacher's
authentic portfolio in a year portfolio 3rd week of March 2017
54%and below of the teachers Complied complete ,neat ,

1 have complete,neat ,accurate accurate and authentic teacher's
and authentic portfolio in a year portfolio on April 2017
BASIC ● Established linkages with Established 5 or more linkages Established linkages with
EDUCATION stakeholders for their support with stakeholders with MOA, stakeholders with MOA, MOU in
SERVICES on MDL-printed modules MOU in a year. the start of the school year.
observing the health protocols 5
and IATF law
Year Round 2% 5 5 5 5.00 0.1

BASIC ● Established linkages with

EDUCATION stakeholders for their support
SERVICES on MDL-printed modules PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RESULTS
observing the health protocols
RATING
SCORE
WEIGHT
MFO's KRA's OBJECTIVES
and IATF law TIMELINE PER KRA
KRA 4: Established 4 linkages with Established linkages with

PARENT'S stakeholders with MOA, MOU. in stakeholders with MOA, MOU in
INVOLVEMENT AND 4 a year. the first quarter of the school
COMMUNITY year.
PARTNERSHIPS
Established 3 linkages with Established linkages with
Year Round 2%
stakeholders with MOA, MOU. in stakeholders with MOA, MOU in
5 5 5 5.00 0.1
(10%) 3 a year. the 2nd quarter of the school
year.
Established 2 linkages with Established linkages with
stakeholders with MOA, MOU. in stakeholders with MOA, MOU in
2 a year. the 3rd quarter of the school year.
Established 1linkage with Established linkages with

stakeholder with MOA, MOU. in stakeholders with MOA, MOU in
1 a year. the 4th quarter of the school year.
● Met parents regularly virtually Met PTA 5 or more times in a 90%-100% Parents' Attendance Conducted the meetings in
or limited face to face to year to discuss SRC ,etc. during PTA Meeting advance of the schedule under
confer/inform about school 5 supported by minutes, D.O. 25, s. 2017
programs/accomplishments agreements,attendance
and to get and retreive modules sheets,pictures,etc.
Met PTA 4 times in a year too 79%-89% Parents' Attendance Conducted the meetings within
discuss SRC, etc. supported by during PTA Meeting the schedule under D.O. 25, s.
4 minutes, agreements,attendance 2017
sheets,pictures,etc.
Year Round 2% 5 5 5 5.00 0.1

Review Period: ● Met parents regularly virtually Date of Review:
or limited face toof
Department face to
Education/Misamis Oriental
School/District/Division: confer/inform about school
programs/accomplishments
and to get and retreive modules
RATING
SCORE
WEIGHT
Met PTA 3 times in a year to 59%-78% Parents' Attendance Conducted the meetings a week
discuss SRC, etc. supported by during PTA Meeting after the schedule under D.O.
Year Round 2% 5 5 5 5.00 0.1
3 minutes, agreements,attendance 25, s. 2017
Met PTA 2 times in a year to 39%-58% Parents' Attendance Conducted the meetings 2 weeks
discuss SRC, etc. supported by during PTA Meeting after the schedule under D.O.
2 minutes, agreements,attendance 25, s. 2017
Met PTA 1 time in a year to 10%-38% Parents' Attendance Conducted the meetings 3 weeks
discuss SRC, etc. supported by during PTA Meeting after the schedule under D.O. 25,
1 minutes, agreements,attendance s. 2017
● Designed programs/projects Designed 5 or more programs Implemented 5 or more Implemented programs /projects
with stakeholders to address /projects with stakeholders to programs /projects with with stakeholders to address
school needs considering the address school needs based on stakeholders to address school school needs based on SWOTa
IATF law and health protocols SWOT supported with program needs based on SWOT week after the approval of the
5 design,minutes/agreements, supported with program design, supported with program
pictures,etc design,minutes/agreements, design,minutes/agreements,
pictures,etc pictures,etc
Designed 4 programs /projects Implemented 4 programs Implemented programs /projects

with stakeholders to address /projects with stakeholders to with stakeholders to address
school needs based on SWOT address school needs based on school needs based on SWOT,2
supported with program SWOT supported with program weeks after the approval of the
4 design,minutes/agreements, design,minutes/agreements, design, supported with program
pictures,etc pictures,etc design,minutes/agreements,
pictures,etc
Year Round 2% 5 5 5 5.00 0.1

● Designed programs/projects
OFFICE PERFORMANCE
with stakeholders to address COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)
school needs considering the
Name of Employee: IATF law and healthVEGA
REYNALDO protocolsMAGAN Name of Rater: NIMFA R. LAGO, PhD, CESO VI
RATING
SCORE
WEIGHT

school needs based on SWOT address school needs based on school needs based on SWOT, a
Year Round 2% supported with program SWOT supported with program month after the approval of the 5 5 5 5.00 0.1
pictures,etc

school needs based on SWOT address school needs based on school needs based on SWOT, 2
supported with program SWOT supported with program months after the approval of the
pictures,etc
Designed 1 program /project with Implemented 1 program /project Implemented programs /projects
stakeholders to address school with stakeholders to address with stakeholders to address
needs based on SWOT school needs based on SWOT school needs based on SWOT,
1 supported with program supported with program 3months after the approval of the
design,minutes/agreements, design,minutes/agreements, design, supported with program
pictures,etc
● To recognize and give Awarded 20 or more Use simple but presentable Awarded stakeholders every end
importance accomplishments of stakeholders during programs awards of less cost using funds of the activity/project
stakeholders using virtual 5 within the school year fully outside from
platforms documented MOOE/PTA/Teachers
Year Round 2% 5 5 5 5.00 0.1


● To recognize and give
importance accomplishments of PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RESULTS
RATING
SCORE
stakeholders using virtual WEIGHT
platforms QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS Q E T AVE.
Awarded 15 to 19 stakeholders Use simple but presentable Awarded stakeholders during

4 during programs at the end of the awards of less cost using funds assembly every end of the
school year fully documented from PTA grading period
Year Round 2% Awarded 10 - 14 stakeholders Use simple but presentable Awarded stakeholders during 5 5 5 5.00 0.1
3 during programs at the end of the awards of less cost using funds education week celebration
school year fully documented from MOOE
Awarded 5-9 stakeholders during Use simple but presentable Awarded stakeholders at the end
2 programs at the end of the school awards of high cost of March
year fully documented
Awarded 4 and below Use most expensive awards of Awarded stakeholders during
1 stakeholders during programs at high cost using funds from the bregada eskwela .
the end of the school year teacher.
● Spearheaded, mediated and Resolved all conflicts within the Resolved conflicts before it is filed
ensured resolution of conflicts 5 school level with complete in the school level
in school observing the health documents
protocols
Resolved all conflicts within the Resolved conflicts after it is filed
4 school level with incomplete in the school level
documents
conflicts not resolved within the Resolved conflicts in two hearings

school level and reaches to after it is filed in the school level
Year Round 1% 3 district office with complete 5 5 5 5.00 0.05
documents
all conflicts not resolved within Resolved conflicts in three
2 the school level reaches division hearings after it is filed in the
level with complete documents school level
● Spearheaded, mediated OFFICE
and PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)
ensured resolution of conflicts
Name of Employee: in school observing VEGA
REYNALDO the healthMAGAN Name of Rater: NIMFA R. LAGO, PhD, CESO VI
protocols
Year Round 1% 5 5 5 5.00 0.05

RATING
SCORE
WEIGHT
all conflicts not resolved within Resolved conflicts in four

1 the school level with complete hearings after it is filed in the
documents school level
BASIC ● Formulated school policies with Formulated 5 or more school Formulated school policies with
EDUCATION stakeholders virtually or face to policies with the participation of the participation of the
SERVICES face considering the IATF law 5 the stakeholders fully stakeholders fully documented
and health protocols documented before the start of classes
Formulated 4 school policies with Formulated school policies with

the participation of the the participation of the
4 stakeholders fully documented stakeholders fully documented
during the start of classes
3 stakeholders fully documented stakeholders fully documented a
Year Round 1% 5 5 5 5.00 0.05
month after the start of classes
two months after the start of
classes
Formulated 1school policy with Formulated school policies with
three months after the start of
classes
RATING
SCORE
WEIGHT
● Lead in crafting the teaching Prepared/submitted SF 7 100% of the teachers garnered Prepared/submitted SF 7
loads and to divide equally the reflecting 6 loads with awards as coordinators on top of reflecting loads with
teaching loads to all school 5 coordinatorships/clubs of the their teaching loads. coordinatorships of teachers
teaching personnel teaching personnel approved by approved by SDS 10 days before
SDS within the school year. the deadline
KRA 5: Prepared/submitted SF 7 85-99% of the teachers garnered Prepared/submitted SF 7
SCHOOL reflecting 5 loads with awards as coordinators on top of reflecting loads with
LEADERSHIP, 4 coordinatorships/clubs of the their teaching loads. coordinatorships of teachers
MANAGEMENT AND teaching personnel approved by approved by SDS 5 days before
OPERATIONS SDS within the school year. the deadline
(20%)
Prepared/submitted SF 7 70-84% of the teachers garnered Prepared/submitted SF 7
reflecting 4 loads with awards as coordinators on top of reflecting loads with
Year Round 4% 3 coordinatorships/clubs of the their teaching loads. coordinatorships of teachers 5 5 5 5.00 0.2
teaching personnel approved by approved by SDS on the
SDS within the school year. deadline
Prepared/submitted SF 7 55-69% of the teachers garnered Prepared/submitted SF 7
reflecting 3 loads with awards as coordinators on top of reflecting loads with
2 coordinatorships/clubs of the their teaching loads. coordinatorships of teachers
teaching personnel approved by approved by SDS 5 days after
Prepared/submitted SF 7 54%and below of the teachers Prepared/submitted SF 7

reflecting 6 loads with garnered awards as coordinators reflecting loads with
1 coordinatorships/clubs of the on top of their teaching loads. coordinatorships of teachers
teaching personnel approved by approved by SDS 10 days after
● Led and implement educational led and implemented 5 or more Addressed 100% of the identified Submitted Accomplishment
programs like in reading and educational programs, program school problems supported by Report before the date spicified
Lac sessions 5 design is approved by SDS accomplishment report and in the approved implementation
before the implementation noted by SDS plan
● Led and implement educational PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RESULTS

programs like in reading and
RATING
SCORE
WEIGHT
MFO's KRA's OBJECTIVES
Lac sessions TIMELINE PER KRA
led and implemented 4 Addressed 85% - 99% of the Submitted Accomplishment

educational programs, program identified school problems Report on the date spicified in
4 design is approved by SDS supported by accomplishment the approved implementation
before the implementation report and noted by SDS plan

educational programs, program identified school problems Report 1day after the date
3 design is approved by SDS supported by accomplishment spicified in the approved
Year Round 3% before the implementation report and noted by SDS implementation plan 5 5 5 5.00 0.15

educational programs, program identified school problems Report 2 days after the date
before the implementation report and noted by SDS implementation plan
led and implemented 1 Addressed 54% and below of the Submitted Accomplishment
educational program, program identified school problems Report 3 days after the date
before the implementation report and noted by SDS implementation plan
BASIC ● Performed School Leadership Submitted complete, accurate Submitted liquidation report Submitted complete, accurate
EDUCATION and Management and ,authentic liquidation reports together with Cash advance for ,authentic liquidation reports 3
SERVICES Operations Functions 5 monthly the next month with no instance days before the deadline
of unliquidated CA.
Submitted complete, accurate Submitted liquidation report Submitted complete, accurate

,authentic liquidation reports bi- without CA for the next month ,authentic liquidation reports 2
4 monthly with no instance of unliquidated days before the deadline
CA
Year Round 3% 5 5 5 5.00 0.15

BASIC
School/District/Division: ● Department ofLeadership
Performed School Education/Misamis Oriental
EDUCATION and Management and
SERVICES Operations Functions
RATING
SCORE
WEIGHT
Submitted incomplete, Submitted liquidation report; or Submitted complete, accurate

accurate ,authentic liquidation both Cash advance for the next ,authentic liquidation reports 1
Year Round 3% 3 reports monthly month with one instances of days before the deadline 5 5 5 5.00 0.15
unliquidated CA
Submitted Submitted liquidation report; or Submitted complete, accurate

incomplete,inaccurate ,not both Cash advance for the next ,authentic liquidation reports on
2 authentic liquidation reports month with two instances of the deadline
monthly unliquidated CA
Submitted Submitted liquidation report ; or Submitted complete, accurate

incomplete,inaccurate ,not bjoth Cash advance for the next ,authentic liquidation reports 1-3
1 authentic liquidation reports bi- month with three instances of days after the deadline
monthly unliquidated CA
● Requested and distributed 100% of the requested 100% of the requested Distributed instructional materials
instructional materials suited for instructional materials were instructional materials according to teachers immediately after the
the learning modality using distributed to teachers as to the needs of the teachers as delivery .
printed modules 5 reflected in the SIP,APP and reflected in the SIP,APP and
summary of disbursement summary of disbursement
received by teachers. received by teachers.
85-99 % of the requested 85-99% of the requested Distributed instructional materials
instructional materials were instructional materials according to teachers a day after the
distributed to teachers as to the needs of the teachers as delivery .
4 reflected in the SIP,APP and reflected in the SIP,APP and
Year Round 3% 5 5 5 5.00 0.15

● Requested and distributed
Position: School Principal 1
instructional materials suited for Position: Assistant Schools Division Superintendent
Review Period: the learning modality using Date of Review:
printed modules
RATING
SCORE
WEIGHT
75-84% of the requested 75-84% of the requested Distributed instructional materials

instructional materials were instructional materials according to teachers 2 days after the
Year Round 3% 3 reflected in the SIP,APP and reflected in the SIP,APP and 5 5 5 5.00 0.15
55-74% of the requested 55-74% of the requested Distributed instructional materials

54% and below of the requested 54% and below of the requested Distributed instructional materials
● Led in the preparation and Crafted a doable, original ,need- Submitted a doable, original Submitted a doable, original
implementation of SIP/AIP/APP based SIP/AIP /APP and ensured ,need-based SIP/AIP /APP and ,need-based SIP/AIP /APP and
and ensured participation of 100% participation of internal and ensured participation of internal ensured participation of internal
stakeholders virtually or face to 5 external stakeholders approved and external stakeholders without and external stakeholders before
face observing the health by SDS supported with revision on SIP /AIP and APP. the deadline
protocols and IATF mandate documents
● Led in the preparation and

implementation of SIP/AIP/APP TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION
and ensured participation of
stakeholders virtually or face to PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RESULTS
RATING
SCORE
WEIGHT
MFO's KRA's face observing the health
OBJECTIVES TIMELINE PER KRA
protocols and IATF mandate QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS Q E T AVE.
Crafted a doable, original ,need- Submitted a doable, original Submitted a doable, original
based SIP/AIP /APP and ensured ,need-based SIP/AIP /APP and ,need-based SIP/AIP /APP and
85-99% participation of internal ensured participation of internal ensured participation of internal
4 and external stakeholders and external stakeholders without and external stakeholders on the
approved by SDS supported with revision on SIP and AIP. And deadline
documents revision on APP.
3 and external stakeholders and external stakeholders with and external stakeholders 1 day
Year Round 4% approved by SDS supported with revisions on the two after the deadline 5 5 5 5.00 0.2
documents
2 and external stakeholders and external stakeholders with and external stakeholders 2 days
approved by SDS supported with revisions on the three after the deadline
documents
Crafted a doable, original ,need- Submitted a doable, original

based SIP/AIP /APP and ensured ,need-based SIP/AIP /APP and
54% and below participation of ensured participation of internal
internal and external stakeholders and external stakeholders 3 days
1 approved by SDS supported with after the deadline
documents
RATING
SCORE
WEIGHT
● Organized special classes for Organized at least 4 special Conducted at least 4 special Conducted classes for learners
learners with special needs or classes for learners with special classes for learners with special with special needs at the start of
exceptionality and to assign a 5 needs with complete documents needs the school year.
teacher to handle the said class (enrolment,teacher,needs)
and to monitor it regularly
Organized 3 special classes for Conducted at least 3 special Conducted classes for learners
learners with special needs with classes for learners with special with special needs a week after
4 complete documents ( enrolment, needs the start of the school year.
teacher, needs)
Organized 2 special class for Conducted at least 2 special Conducted classes for learners
Year Round 3% learners with special needs with classes for learners with special with special needs two weeks 5 5 5 5.00 0.15
3 complete documents needs after the start of the school year.
( enrolment, teacher, needs)
Organized 1 special class for Conducted 1 special classes for Conducted classes for learners
learners with special needs with learners with special needs with with special needs a month after
2 complete documents no documents the start of the school year.
( enrolment, teacher, needs)
Organized no special class for non-compliant Conducted classes for learners

1 learners with special needs. with special needs two months
after the start of the school year.
100% 5.00
LEGEND:
Ratee: Rater: 4.5 - 5.0 - O
REYNALDO VEGA MAGAN NIMFA R. LAGO, PhD, CESO VI 3.5 - 4.499 - VS
School Principal Assistant Schools Division Superintendent 2.5 - 3.499 - S
1.5 - 2.499 - US
Approving Authority:
JONATHAN S. DELA PEŇA
RATING
SCORE
WEIGHT
Schools Division Superintendent Page 6 of 6

CHECKLIST OF DOCUMENTS FOR OPCRF
( / or REMARKS /
KRA's OBJECTIVES x) DOCUMENTS AND ARTIFACTS SUGGESTIONS GIVEN
● Supervised and directed all school Instructional Supervisory Plan (Completed Monthly,stamped received in the Division
KRA 1: teaching & non-teaching personnel Office on the target date.
INSTRUCTIONA ● Managed Instructional System

L LEADERSHIP Instructional Supervision Form and /or Clinical observation sheets compiled monthly
● Inspected regularly Daily Lesson Instructional Accomplishment Reports in the form of Individual Teacher Teaching
Logs (DLL) Performance Record (ITTPR)
Teacher Observed and Given Assistance( TOGA) complied monthly ,stamped received
in the Division Office on the Target date.
● Monitored teachers upkeep of Report comparative NAT RESULT (Graphical Presentation of previous and present
students records results showing comparison)
● Provided a safe and child friendly Child Friendly School Survey

KRA 2: learning environment for learners Child Protection Policy
Scouting
SCHOOL Feeding Program
RESOURCE
Health Care Package
MANAGEMENT
Athletics
Religious Instruction
● Evaluated the school plant, physical School Building Inventory

facilities, safety and sufficiencywith DRRM Mobilization Plan
the assistance of specialist Fire Insurance
School Report Card
Classroom Structuring
Updated EBEIS
Child Protection Policy
School Site Development Plan
School Ownership
School Policy Development
● Formulated intervention prorgram to Performance Indicators

determine the strength, weakness, Fire Drill
opportunities, threats (SWOT) of the Eartquake Drill
school
School Watching List
School Deworming Report
School Immunization Report
Brigada Eskwela
Schoo-Based Management
Continuous Improvemement (CI) Projects
● Supervised and directed all school Teacher's Portfolio

KRA 3: teaching and non-teaching personnel a) Observation Sheets
b) TSNA Result
HUMAN c) IPPD
RESOURCE
MANAGEMENT
● Organized and conducted In-Service Report on Training conducted in school
AND
DEVELOPMENT Training a) Memorandum of In-Service Training
b) Training Matrix and Design
c) Attendance Sheet
d) Narrattive Report and Pictures
● Assigned teachers where they best SF 7

fit to teach (grades/learning areas, Form 201
special assignments) DHRIS
RESOURCE
MANAGEMENT
AND
DEVELOPMENT
( / or REMARKS /
KRA's OBJECTIVES x) DOCUMENTS AND ARTIFACTS SUGGESTIONS GIVEN
● Promoted and coordinated services List of teachers recommended for promotion with approved ERF
for the holistic development of school List of teachers promoted
personnel and learners List of teachers sent as trainers, coaches, chaperons or coordinators
● Initiated and compiled teacher's Teacher's Portfolio

professional documents in portfolios DHRIS
List of teachers promoted
● Established linkages with Letter of Invitation, Minutes, Attendance, Pictorials

KRA 4: stakeholders MOA
Resolution
PARENT'S Projects Implemented
INVOLVEMENT
Brigada Eskwela
AND
COMMUNITY BSP/GSP
PARTNERSHIPS Participation Community Activities
● Met parents regularly to Letter of Invitation, Minutes, Attendance, Pictorials

confer/inform about school Quarterly Conferences
accomplishments Narrative Report
SOSA (Accomplishment Reports, SRC, Financial Report)
● Designed programs with ESIP

stakeholders to address schoo AIP
needs School Development Plan
Strategic Plan
Accomplishment Report
Pictorials
● Recognized accomplishments of Certificate of Appreciation/Recognition

stakeholders Program of Activities (Stakeholderr's Day, Team Building)
Narrattive Report
Pictorials
● Promoted welfare of stakeholders Action Plan

School Policies
Letter of Invitation, Minutes, Attendance, Pictorials
● Mediated and ensured resolution of School Mediation Committee (Organizational Structure)

conflicts in school School Grievance Committee
Anectdotal Record
School Case Record
Narrative Report
Pictorials
● Formulated school policies with Stakeholders Constitution and by Laws

stakeholders Handbook
● Harnessed participation of alumni Letter of Invitation, Minutes, Attendance, Pictorials

and other organization (NGO's, Alumni Organizational Structure
LGU's, PPP) Alumni Activities
Membership Records, Financial Reords
Projects Implemented
Accomplishment Report
● Supervised and directed all school Class Porgram

KRA 5: teaching and non-teaching personnel Coordinatorships and Clubs
SCHOOL ● Led and implemented educational DropOut Reduction Program

LEADERSHIP, programs
MANAGEMENT
AND
OPERATIONS
KRA 5:
( / or REMARKS /
KRA's
SCHOOL OBJECTIVES
● Led and implemented educational x) DOCUMENTS AND ARTIFACTS SUGGESTIONS GIVEN
LEADERSHIP, programs IPED
MANAGEMENT
AND Reading Program
OPERATIONS Alternative Delivery Mode
GAD
● Directed, coordinated nad managed Request for Cash Advances

school funds according to prioritizes Liquidation Reports
needs
● Requested and distributed Purchase Request

instructional materials Requisition and Issue Slip
Logbook
● Led the preparation of SIP/AIP and Accomplished AIP, SIP

ensured participation of stakeholders Letter of Invitation, Minutes, Attendance, Pictorials
● Organized special classes for List of learners with special needs

learners with special needs School Form 1, SF-2, SF-5, SF-6
Learning Modules and Materials
1. Implement Basic
Education Learning
Continuity Plan - (BE-
LCP) Goals, Objectives
and target during the
rating period.
a.

Office Performance Commitment and Review Form (Opcrf) : Reynaldo Vega Magan Nimfa R. Lago, PHD, Ceso Vi School Principal 1

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Office Performance Commitment and Review Form (Opcrf) : Reynaldo Vega Magan Nimfa R. Lago, PHD, Ceso Vi School Principal 1

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Office Performance Commitment and Review Form (Opcrf) : Reynaldo Vega Magan Nimfa R. Lago, PHD, Ceso Vi School Principal 1

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)

School/District/Division: Department of Education/Misamis Oriental

TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RESULTS