Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Design of Helical Gear

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 58

Helical Gears REV 00

Design of Helical Gears

Amit Belvekar-Patil

Prof. Amit B. Belvekar-Patil Machine Design


REV 00

John Deere 3350 tractor cut in Technikmuseum Speyer Museum

Prof. Amit B. Belvekar-Patil Machine Design


MECHANICAL DRIVES REV 00

What is Mechanical Drives?

Need of mechanical drives ?

A) To reduce speed (Ex. Overhead crane)

B) To get variable speed (Ex. Lathe machine)

Types of mechanical drives

1. Transmitting power by means of friction.

e.g. Belt drives and Rope drives

2. Transmitting power by means of engagement.

e.g. Chain drives and Gear drives

Selection of Mechanical Drive.

Prof. Amit B. Belvekar-Patil Machine Design


INTRODUCTION REV 00

Let the wheel A be keyed to the rotating shaft and the wheel B to the shaft, to be rotated.
A little consideration will show, that when the wheel A is rotated by a rotating shaft, it will rotate the wheel B in
the opposite direction as shown in Fig. (a).
The wheel B will be rotated (by the wheel A) so long as the tangential force exerted by the wheel A does not exceed
the maximum frictional resistance between the two wheels.
But when the tangential force (P) exceeds the frictional resistance (F), slipping will take place between the two
wheels. Thus the friction drive is not a positive drive.
In order to avoid the slipping, a number of projections (called teeth) as shown in Fig. (b), are provided on the
periphery of the wheel A, which will fit into the corresponding recesses on the periphery of the wheel B.
 A friction wheel with the teeth cut on it is known as toothed wheel or gear.

Prof. Amit B. Belvekar-Patil Machine Design


GEARS REV 00

1.Gears are toothed wheels which can transmit power & motion from one shaft to another shaft
by means of successive engagement of teeth.
2.Gear drive is provided when distance between two shaft is small
3.Gear drive is positive drive. i.e. No slipping.
4.Gear drive consists of two wheels small one called pinion while larger one is called gear.

Prof. Amit B. Belvekar-Patil Machine Design


Gear Drive – Significance REV 00

1. Positive drive

2. Compact construction

3. Large power transmission

4. Power transmission at very low speed

5. Very high efficiency

6. Wide range of velocity ratio

Prof. Amit B. Belvekar-Patil Machine Design


CLASSIFICATION OF GEARS REV 00

GEARS

NONINTERSECTING NONINTERSECTING
PARALLEL AXES INTERSECTING
AXES GEARS & PERPENDICULAR & NONPARALLEL
GEARS AXES AXES

Spur Gear Bevel Gear  worm and worm gears  Spiral Gears

Helical Gear

 Herringbone Gear

Rack and Pinion

Prof. Amit B. Belvekar-Patil Machine Design


SPUR GEAR: SYLLABUS REV 00

Parallel shaft Axes Gears


1. Spur Gear
2. Herringbone Gears
3. Helical Gear
4. Rack and Pinion

Prof. Amit B. Belvekar-Patil Machine Design


SPUR GEAR REV 00

Teeth are parallel to axis of rotation


Transmit power from one shaft to another parallel shaft
Used in Electric screwdriver, windup alarm clock, washing machine
and clothes dryer

Advantages-
1. Easy to manufacture
2. Less expensive
3. Efficiency is up to 98%

Disadvantages-
1. Not used for high speed applications due to noisy operation.

Prof. Amit B. Belvekar-Patil Machine Design


SPUR GEAR: EXTERNAL & INTERNAL REV 00

EXTERNAL SPUR GEAR INTERNAL SPUR GEAR

Prof. Amit B. Belvekar-Patil Machine Design


RACK & PINION REV 00

Rack and pinion gears are used to convert rotary motion (From the pinion) into linear motion (of the rack)
 Rack Has no curvature having infinite radius
 Lathe Machine, Drilling Machine

RACK

Prof. Amit B. Belvekar-Patil Machine Design


HELICAL GEAR REV 00

The teeth on helical gears are cut at an angle to the face of the gear (Helix)
Two mating gears have same helix angle but opposite hands
This gradual engagement makes helical gears operate much more smoothly and quietly than spur gears.
Used at high velocity & load capacity applications
Subjected to both radial & tangential load ALONG WITH AXIAL LOAD
Machine tool gearbox,
Automobile gear box

Advantages-
1. Operation is smooth and quietly
2. Efficiency is up to 99%
3. Suitable for high speed applications

Disadvantages-
1. Difficult to manufacture.
2. Exerts end thrust

Prof. Amit B. Belvekar-Patil Machine Design


HERRINGBONE GEAR REV 00

To avoid axial thrust, two helical gears of opposite hand can be mounted side by side, to cancel resulting
thrust forces
Double helical gear
Herringbone gears are mostly used on heavy machinery.

Prof. Amit B. Belvekar-Patil Machine Design


BEVEL GEAR REV 00

Bevel gears are used for transmitting motion between two intersecting shafts at desired angle.
Surface of bevel gear is like frustum of cone.
The teeth on bevel gears can be straight, spiral
locomotives, marine applications, automobiles, printing presses, cooling towers, power plants, steel
plants, railway track inspection machines, etc.

Prof. Amit B. Belvekar-Patil Machine Design


WORM GEAR REV 00

Worm gears are used when large gear reductions are needed. It is common for worm gears to have reductions of 20:1, and
even up to 300:1 or greater.
Self locking or Non reversible.
Many worm gears have an interesting property that no other gear set has: the worm can easily turn the gear, but the gear
cannot turn the worm.
Worm gears are used widely in material handling ,machine tools, automobiles steering Mechanisms, Lifts, Cranes

Prof. Amit B. Belvekar-Patil Machine Design


Terms in Spur & Helical Gears REV 00

SPUR Gear Helical Gear Equivalent Spur Gear

b
b 
'
Face Width
b cos 
d
Pitch circle Diameter d d 
'

cos 2 
z
Number of Teeth Z z 
'

cos 
3

mt  TangentialModule
Module m
mn  NormalModule
Prof. Amit B. Belvekar-Patil Machine Design
Terms in Spur & Helical Gears REV 00

SPUR Gear Helical Gear Equivalent Spur Gear

'
Lewis Form Factor
Y Y

Prof. Amit B. Belvekar-Patil Machine Design


REV 00

Design of Helical Gears

Prof. Amit B. Belvekar-Patil Machine Design


Steps in Design of Helical Gears REV 00

STEP 1 Beam Strength of Helical gear tooth

STEP 2 Wear Strength of Helical gear tooth

STEP 3 Check for Beam strength & Wear Strength

STEP 4 Preliminary estimation by velocity factor Kv

STEP 5 Precise estimation by Buckingham's equation

STEP 6 Check Safety of Gear

Prof. Amit B. Belvekar-Patil Machine Design


Beam Strength of a Helical Gear Tooth (Bending Failure) REV 00

LEWIS EQUATION FOR BEAM STRENGTH


 Beam Strength :
Maximum tangential load the gear tooth can take without tooth breakage (bending failure).

Fb  m.b. b .Y
Fb
For Spur Gear
Fbn
b

b' 
cos 
Fbn  mn .b ' . b .Y ' Fb

Fbn 
cos
b
b' 
Fb  mn .b . b .Y ' cos 

Prof. Amit B. Belvekar-Patil Machine Design


Beam Strength of a Helical Gear Tooth (Bending Failure) REV 00

Lewis Equation

Fb  mn .b . b .Y '

Where,

mn= Normal Module in mm

b= Face width in mm 9mn  b  15mn In the preliminary stage generally face width is taken as 10m

( S ut )
Ϭb = Bending Stress in N/mm2 b 
3

Y= Lewis form factor 2.87


Y  0.484  '
_____( 20 0
full depth)
Z

Prof. Amit B. Belvekar-Patil Machine Design


Wear Strength of a Helical Gear Tooth (Pitting Failure) REV 00

For Spur Gear Fw


Fw  d p b.Q.K Fwn
b 
b  '

cos 
Fwn  d p b .Q .K
' ' '

Fw d
Fwn  d 
'

cos cos2  b
b' 
d p b.Q.K cos 
Fw 
cos 2  z 
z ' d p  mt .Z p
cos3  b
'
Q=Ratio factor for external gear pair 2Z g
Q' 
(Z g  Z p )
' '

Prof. Amit B. Belvekar-Patil Machine Design


Steps to Design of Helical Gear REV 00

Step 1: Beam Strength of teeth using Lewis equation Weaker of Gear & Pinion in bending

Pinion Fb  mn .b . b .Y '
Gear

( S ut ) p ( S ut ) g
 bp   bg 
3 3

2.87 2.87
 0.484   0.484 
' '
Yp '
Yg '
Zp Zg

 bp .Yp '
 bg .Yg '

 bp .Yp '
<  bg .Yg '
Pinion is weaker in bending Fb  mn .b. bp .Y p
'

 bp .Y p '
>  bg .Yg ' Gear is weaker in bending Fb  mn .b. bg .Yg
'

Prof. Amit B. Belvekar-Patil Machine Design


Wear Strength of a Spur Gear Tooth REV 00

Step 2: Wear strength Maximum tangential load gear tooth can take without wear/pitting failure
d p b.Q.K
Fw 
cos2 
dp= Pitch Circle Diameter of pinion d p  mt .Z p
in mm
2Z g
Q=Ratio factor for external gear pair Q
(Z g  Z p )
2
K= load stress factor N/mm2  BHN  When Pinion & Gear made with Steel- Steel
K  0.16  
 100 
2
 BHN 
K  0.18  When Pinion & Gear made with Steel- Cast Iron
 100 
2
 BHN  When Pinion & Gear made with Cast Iron- Cast Iron
K  0.21 
 100 

Prof. Amit B. Belvekar-Patil Machine Design


Design of Helical Gear REV 00

STEP 3 Beam Strength V/s Wear Strength

Fb  mn .b . b .Y ' d p b.Q.K
Fw 
cos2 

Fb < Fw Gear Pair is weaker in Bending

Fb > Fw Gear Pair is weaker in Pitting

Prof. Amit B. Belvekar-Patil Machine Design


Design of Helical Gear REV 00

STEP 4  Effective Load on Gear Tooth

Ft Tangential Force

Ft max Max Tangential Force

Feff Total Max Tangential Force


Prof. Amit B. Belvekar-Patil Machine Design
Design of Helical Gear REV 00

STEP 4 1. Fluctuation of torque because of prime


movers and driven machine
 Maximum Tangential Load F tmax :
2. Non uniform distribution of load
 Maximum Tangential Load (Ftmax ) is given by across the face width

3. Tooth error and pitch line velocity


Ft max  k a K m Ft (Dynamic load)

Where Ka is Service / Application / Overload factor Compressor

Ka Depends upon application


Driving and Driven elements
Max Torque
Ka 
Rated Torque Motor

Prof. Amit B. Belvekar-Patil Machine Design


REV 00

Ka is Service / Application / Overload factor

Prof. Amit B. Belvekar-Patil Machine Design


REV 00

Km Load Distribution Factor/ Load concentration Factor

Accounts Non uniform distribution of load across the face width

Prof. Amit B. Belvekar-Patil Machine Design


Dynamic load on gear Tooth REV 00

 Ka and Km does not account for inertia forces arising due to tooth errors.

 Gear tooth are NEVER perfect due to inaccuracy in tooth profile, error in tooth spacing run out of gear and

deflection of tooth under load results in Transmission Error.

 Transmission error causes cyclic fluctuation of speed ratio.

 So during meshing each tooth undergoes short period of acceleration and deceleration

 This acceleration and deceleration combined with mass of pinion and gear results in inertia forces.

 So this Additional Forces arises due to inertia forces are Dynamic Load

 Dynamic load depends on

1. Tooth error

2. Pitch Line velocity

Prof. Amit B. Belvekar-Patil Machine Design


Dynamic load on gear Tooth REV 00

Estimations of Dynamic load

Preliminary Estimation Precise Estimation

STEP 4 STEP 5
1. Fluctuation of torque because of prime movers and 3. Tooth error and pitch line velocity (Dynamic
driven machine load)
2. Non uniform distribution of load across the face
width

Feff 
Ft max

K a Ft K m Feff  Ftmax  Fd
kV KV
Prof. Amit B. Belvekar-Patil Machine Design
Barth Factor/Velocity Factor REV 00

STEP 4
Preliminary Estimation By Velocity factor Kv:

Ft max K a Ft K m
Feff  
kV KV

3 m 6 m
KV  V  10 KV  V  20
3 V s 6 V s
3 .6 m 5 .6 m
KV  20  V  25 KV  25  V  30
3 .6  V s 5 .6  V s

Prof. Amit B. Belvekar-Patil Machine Design


Beam Strength of a Spur Gear Tooth (Bending Failure) REV 00

Feff  Ftmax  Fd
STEP 5 Precise Estimation By Buckinghams Equation Fd:

• According to Buckingham Approach Fd is given by

Fd 

21V bC . cos 2   Ft max  X cos 
21V  bC. cos 2
  Ft max 
K is constant, depends on tooth
 E p Eg
ke 
C   ke   form
 1  E E 
  1  p g  K=0.107 -14.50
E E  K=0.111 - 200 Full depth
 p g 
K=0.115 - 200 stub
E =modulus of Elasticity C =Deformation factor

C =11500e N/mm
K =tooth Form factor e = Combined Tooth Error

Prof. Amit B. Belvekar-Patil Machine Design


Beam Strength of a Spur Gear Tooth (Bending Failure) REV 00

STEP 5 C =Deformation factor

 E p Eg
ke 
C   ke   e = Combined Tooth Error
 1   E p  Eg 
1
    
E E  e = ep + eg
 p g 

Prof. Amit B. Belvekar-Patil Machine Design


Beam Strength of a Spur Gear Tooth (Bending Failure) REV 00
STEP 5

e = ep + eg

Prof. Amit B. Belvekar-Patil Machine Design


STEP 5 Beam Strength of a Spur Gear Tooth (Bending Failure) REV 00

 Effective Load on Gear Tooth


 Actual Load on gear tooth to transmit power
 Tangential Load + Dynamic Load

Effective Load Feff

Tangential Load Dynamic Load


Ftmax Fd

Feff  Ftmax  Fd
Prof. Amit B. Belvekar-Patil Machine Design
REV 00

STEP 6 Design Check Check the Safety of gear Pair

Check the Safety Against bending failure

In order to avoid the bending failure Fb > Feff


By Considering the FOS Fb  N f Feff

In order to avoid the Pitting failure Fw > Feff


By Considering the FOS Fw  N f Feff
Prof. Amit B. Belvekar-Patil Machine Design
REV 00

Thank You!!
Prof. Amit B. Belvekar-Patil Machine Design
Helical Gears REV 00

Design of Helical Gears

Amit Belvekar-Patil
Sachin Dhavane
Dr. A. M Malge

Prof. Amit B. Belvekar-Patil Machine Design


REV 00

Problem 1 : A helical pinion having teeth to be made of alloy steel (Sut= 800 N/mm2) is to mesh with a
gear made of plain carbon steel (Sut=720 N/mm2). The gear pair is required to transmit 30kW power from
an electric motor running at 720 r. p.m.. to a machine running at 225 rpm. The application factor and load
concentration factors are 1.3 and 1.1 resp. The required FOS is 2. The face width is ten times the normal
module. The tooth system is 20 full depth involute, while the helix angle is 25. The gear pair is machined
to meet the specifications of grade 7. The deformation factor for gear pair is 11000e N/mm.
Design the gear pair by using velocity factor and Buckingham
S equation for dynamic load. Suggest surface hardness for gear pair.
Use following data.
5.6
Kv 
5.6  V
Grade 7 e  11.00  0.9 [mn  0.25 d ]m
C  11000e N/mm

Prof. Amit B. Belvekar-Patil Machine Design


REV 00

Problem 1 : A helical pinion having teeth to be made of alloy steel (Sut= 800 N/mm2) is to mesh with a gear made of plain carbon steel (Sut=720 N/mm2).

The gear pair is required to transmit 30kW power from an electric motor running at 720 r. p.m.. to a machine running at 225 rpm. The application factor and
load concentration factors are 1.3 and 1.1 resp. The required FOS is 2. The face width is ten times the normal module. The tooth system is 20 full depth
involute, while the helix angle is 25. The gear pair is machined to meet the specifications of grade 7. The deformation factor for gear pair is 11000e n/mm.
Design the gear pair by using velocity factor and Buckinghams equation for dynamic load. Suggest surface hardness for gear pair.
Use following data.
Pinion Gear

Given Data : Zp  14
  250
Sutp  800 N/mm 2
Sutg  720 N/mm 2
P  30kW  30x103W
Np  720 rpm Ng  225 rpm

Ka  1.3 5.6
Kv 
5.6  V
Km  1.1
C  11000 e N/mm Grade 7 e  11.00  0.9 [mn  0.25 d ]m

Type of standard Tooth System  20 Full Depth b  10 m n FOS  2

Prof. Amit B. Belvekar-Patil Machine Design


STEP 1 Beam Strength REV 00

Fb  mn .b . b .Y ' z
z 
'

cos 3 
Pinion Gear
zp
z p  18.8
'
zp 
'
Pinion Is Weaker In Bending  bp .Yp '
< bg .Yg
'
cos 3 
Gear Is Weaker In Bending  bp .Y p '
> bg .Yg
' zg
z g  60.45
zg 
' '

cos 
3
( S ut ) p ( S ut ) g
 bp   bg 
3 3

2.87 2.87
Y p  0.484  ' Yg  0.484  '
Zp Zg

Zp  14 Np  720 rpm
NP d Z Z 720 ZG
Zg  44.8  45
NP
G  G  G  G 
Ng  225 rpm NG dp Zp NG Zp 225 14

Prof. Amit B. Belvekar-Patil Machine Design


STEP 1 Beam Strength Fb  mn .b . b .Y ' REV 00

Pinion Gear
2.87 ( S ut ) g 2.87
 bp 
( Sut ) p
Y p  0.484  '  bg  Yg  0.484  '
3 Zp 3 Zg
800 2.87 720
 bp  Y p  0.484   bg  Yg  0.484 
2.87
3 18.8061 3 60.4484
σ bp  266.667 N/mm 2 Yp '  0.3313 σ bg  240 N/mm 2 Yg '  0.4365

 bp .Yp '
<  bg .Yg '
Pinion is weaker in bending Fb  mn .b. bp .Y p
'

 bp .Y p '
>  bg .Yg ' Gear is weaker in bending Fb  mn .b. bg .Yg
'

σ bp .Y p  88.3467 N/mm 2 <  bg .Yg '  104.76 N/mm 2


Fb  mn .b. bp .Y p Fb  mn .10mn .266.667 X .0.3313 Fb  883.4677 mn N
' 2

Prof. Amit B. Belvekar-Patil Machine Design


Wear Strength of a Spur Gear Tooth REV 00

Step 2: Wear strength As surface hardness is unknown, we cannot find wear strength of gear pair
d p b.Q.K
Fw 
cos2 
dp= Pitch Circle Diameter of pinion d p  mt .Z p
in mm
2Z g
Q=Ratio factor for external gear pair Q
(Z g  Z p )
2
K= load stress factor N/mm2  BHN  When Pinion & Gear made with Steel- Steel
K  0.16  
 100 
2
 BHN 
K  0.18  When Pinion & Gear made with Steel- Cast Iron
 100 
2
 BHN  When Pinion & Gear made with Cast Iron- Cast Iron
K  0.21 
 100 

Prof. Amit B. Belvekar-Patil Machine Design


Design of Helical Gear REV 00

STEP 3 Beam Strength V/s Wear Strength

Fb  mn .b . b .Y ' d p b.Q.K
Fw 
cos2 

Fb < Fw Gear Pair is weaker in Bending

Fb > Fw Gear Pair is weaker in Pitting

Prof. Amit B. Belvekar-Patil Machine Design


STEP 4 Preliminary Estimation By Velocity factor Kv: REV 00

Ft max K a Ft K m Module  m n
Feff  
kV KV

In order to avoid the Bending failure Fb  N f Feff


Ft max  k a K m Ft Ka  1.3 Km  1.1 Kv  5.6
5.6  V

P d p n p
Ft  V
V 60 x 1000

Prof. Amit B. Belvekar-Patil Machine Design


REV 00

d p n p d g n g
V V
60 x 1000 60 x 1000

d p n p  mt z pnp
 mn z pnp
V V V
60 x 1000 60 x 1000 cos  .60 x 1000

Z p  14 Np  720 rpm   250

V  0.5823mn ( m / sec)

P 30X10 3 5.6 5.6 5.6


Ft  Ft  Kv  Kv 
5.6  0.5823mn
Kv 
5.6  0.763 m n
V 0.5823m n 5.6  V

Prof. Amit B. Belvekar-Patil Machine Design


REV 00

K a Ft K m
Feff 
KV

1.3X1.1  30X10 3 
Feff  X 
5.6  0.5823m n 
5.6  0.763 m n

73.6733 X 103  10.0379 X 103 mn


Feff 
mn

Prof. Amit B. Belvekar-Patil Machine Design


REV 00

In order to avoid the Bending failure

Fb  N f Feff Fb  883.4677 mn N
2 FOS  2

 73.6733 X 103  10.0379 X 103 mn 


 (2)x 
2
883.4677 mn 
 mn 

441.7338m n  73.6733 X 103  10.0379X10 3 m n


3

m n  6.0616mm m n  6.1mm

Normal Module m n  8 mm

Prof. Amit B. Belvekar-Patil Machine Design


Dimensions of Gear pair REV 00

mn 8
m n  8mm mt  mt  m t  8.827 mm
cos  cos 25
Z p  14
dp  mt z p d p  123.58mm

Zg  45
dg  mt zg d g  397.21mm

b  10m n b  10x8  80mm

h f  1.25m n h f  10mm
h a  1m n h a  8mm

Fb  883.4677mn N
2
Fb  883.4677 X (8) 2 N Fb  56542.53 N

Prof. Amit B. Belvekar-Patil Machine Design


Precise Estimation By Buckinghams Equation Fd: REV 00

STEP 5 Feff  Ftmax  Fd


V  0.5823mn (m / sec)

Ftmax  K a Ft K m Ft 
30X103
Ft 
30X103
V  4.6584( m / sec)
0.5823mn 4.6584

Ftmax  1.3X1.1X6439.975 Ft  6439.975 N

Ftmax  9209.1642N

b  80mm

Fd 

21V bC. cos2   Ft max  X cos C  11000e N/mm
21V  bC. cos 2
  Ft max    250

Prof. Amit B. Belvekar-Patil Machine Design


REV 00
STEP 5 Precise Estimation By Buckinghams Equation Fd:

C  11000e N/mm
Grade 7 e  11.00  0.9 [mn  0.25 d ]m

e  ep  eg

e p  11.00  0.9 [mn  0.25 d p ]m e g  11.00  0.9 [mn  0.25 d g ]m

e p  20.7012μ0 e g  22.6843 μm

e  ep  eg e  20.7012  22.6843  43.3855 μm e  43.3855 x 10 -3 mm

C  11500 x e N/mm C  477.2405 N/mm

Prof. Amit B. Belvekar-Patil Machine Design


REV 00

Fd 

21 X 4.6584 80 X 477.2405 X (cos 25) 2  9209.1642  X cos 25
21 X 4.6584  80 X 477.2405 X (cos 25) 2
 9209.1642 
Fd  12.0199 X 103 N

Feff  Ftmax  Fd
Feff  9209.1642  12.0199 X 103

Feff  21.2291X 10 3

Prof. Amit B. Belvekar-Patil Machine Design


REV 00

STEP 6 Design Check Check the Safety of gear Pair

In order to avoid the bending failure Fb > Feff Feff  21.2291X 10 3

Fb  56542.53N
By Considering the FOS Fb  N f Feff
N f  2.6634 > 2
(N f ) calculated > (N f )Given
Design of Gear Pair is safe

Prof. Amit B. Belvekar-Patil Machine Design


Wear Strength of a Spur Gear Tooth REV 00

Step 2: Wear strength

d p b.Q.K
Fw 
cos 2 
dp= Pitch Circle Diameter of pinion d p  mt .Z p d p  123.58mm Z p  14 Zg  45
in mm
2Z g
Q=Ratio factor for external gear pair Q Q  1.5254
(Z g  Z p )
2
K= load stress factor N/mm2  BHN  When Pinion & Gear made with Steel- Steel
K  0.16  
 100 

2 2
123.5783 X 80 X 1.5254 X 0.16  BHN   BHN 
Fw    Fw  2937.5448 
 100   100 
2
(cos 25)

Prof. Amit B. Belvekar-Patil Machine Design


REV 00

By Considering the FOS Fw > Feff Feff  21.2291X 103

In order to avoid the Pitting failure Fw  N f Feff


2
 BHN 
2937.5448   ( N f ) given X21.2291X10
3

 100 
BHN  380.1793  385

Prof. Amit B. Belvekar-Patil Machine Design


REV 00

Thank You!!
Prof. Amit B. Belvekar-Patil Machine Design
REV 00

Prof. Amit B. Belvekar-Patil Machine Design

You might also like