Pregnancy, Parturition and Preeclampsia in Women of African Ancestry
Pregnancy, Parturition and Preeclampsia in Women of African Ancestry
Pregnancy, Parturition and Preeclampsia in Women of African Ancestry
org
From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Makerere University and Mulago Hospital, Kampala, Uganda (Dr Nakimuli and Drs Byamugisha and
Mirembe); Department of Pathology and Centre for Trophoblast Research, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom (Drs Chazara and
Moffett); Medical Research Council/Uganda Virus Research Institute Uganda Research Unit on AIDS, Entebbe, Uganda (Drs Elliott and Kaleebu); and
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom (Dr Elliott).
Received Sept. 11, 2013; revised Oct. 22, 2013; accepted Oct. 28, 2013.
This study was supported by the Wellcome Trust (grants 090108/Z/09/Z and 085992/Z/08/Z and a vacation scholarship in 2011); the British Heart
Foundation (grant PG/ 09/077/27964); the Centre for Trophoblast Research at the University of Cambridge; and a Wellcome Trust Uganda PhD
Fellowship in Infection and Immunity held by A.N., supported by a Wellcome Trust Strategic Award (grant 084344).
The authors report no conflict of interest.
Reprints: Ashley Moffett, MA, MB, BChir, MD, MRCP, MRCPath, Department of Pathology and Centre for Trophoblast Research, University of
Cambridge, Tennis Court Rd., Cambridge CB2 1QP, United Kingdom. am485@cam.ac.uk.
0002-9378/$36.00
ª 2014 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2013.10.879
TABLE 2
Preeclampsia or eclampsia studies among African Americans
Preeclampsia or
Cohort size (total/AA) eclampsia, OR (95% CI) Comments Reference
2,571,069/450,098 1.67 (1.64e1.71)a PE in women in New York state 23
24
1,030,350/161,780 1.59 (1.49e1.69) Adjusted for maternal characteristics and obstetric history
25
1,472,912/420,576 1.30 (1.28e1.33) Adjusted for maternal characteristics and obstetric history
299,499/n.a. 1.39 (1.26e1.54)a Severe PE in women without chronic hypertension 26
27
206,428/19,512 2.12 (1.85e2.42) Adjusted for maternal characteristics and obstetric history
29
330/124 2.25 (0.88e5.78) Eclampsia, adjusted for maternal characteristics and obstetric history
30
4702/740 1.40 (1.20e1.80) Adjusted for maternal characteristics and obstetric history
31
271/38 2.50 (0.97e6.40) Adjusted for maternal characteristics and obstetric history
32
4314/1998 1.23 (0.88e1.72) Adjusted for maternal characteristics and obstetric history
33
153/35 2.27 (1.26e5.92) Late postpartum PE, not adjusted
34
2394/592 1.53 (1.00e2.35) Adjusted for maternal characteristics, obstetric history, and biochemical factors
103,860/13,748 1.36 (1.27e1.45)a PE in women with singleton birth at first delivery 35
36
2,770,871/121,017 1.81 (1.51e2.17) Eclampsia, adjusted for maternal characteristics and obstetric history
28
127,544/12,639 1.41 (1.25e1.62) Adjusted for maternal characteristics, chronic hypertension excluded
a 38
16,300/6000 1.63 (1.58e1.69) Eclampsia in racial minorities, not adjusted, not significant
40
1355/374 3.20 (1.04e9.93) PE in women without chronic hypertension
67
500/68 2.29 (1.16e4.53) Recurrent PE, adjusted for maternal characteristics and obstetric history
44
10,755/5555 1.30 (1.07e1.58) Adjusted for maternal characteristics
69
2947/156 1.62 (0.00e3.20) No effect when analyzed by recruitment center
Maternal characteristics generally include maternal age, body mass index, and smoking. Obstetric history generally includes parity, chronic hypertension, and diabetes.
CI, confidence interval; n.a., not available; OR, odds ratio; PE, preeclampsia.
a
OR was calculated from the data.
Nakimuli. Pregnancy, parturition and preeclampsia in Africa. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014.
into account, the findings remained the for both eclampsia and preeclampsia revealed a higher incidence of pre-
same.24 The other study used data from in nulliparous and parous women have eclampsia and eclampsia among AA
women who were all Medicaid enrollees also shown AA are at higher risk women compared with their European
in 14 southern states.25 AA women were (Table 2).28-36 counterparts, irrespective of whether
also most likely to have other poor Confounding factors such as obesity, there was preexisting hypertension.41
maternal outcomes like preterm labor, preexisting chronic hypertension, and Investigation of the GOS other than
abruptio placenta, and stillbirth. diabetes are difficult to control for and preeclampsia is more difficult because
Another large study from the National are likely to contribute to the increased of the problems in accurate diagnosis
Hospital Discharge Survey found AA risk of preeclampsia among AA, partic- described above. Nonetheless, a consis-
women had a higher incidence of all ularly in the case of chronic hyperten- tent message is that ethnic disparities
hypertensive disorders in pregnancy and sion.37-39 That preeclampsia may not be exist for all the GOS (spontaneous pre-
a greater risk of severe complications of wholly explained by higher rates of term labor, FGR, stillbirth, and other
preeclampsia such as abruptio placenta chronic hypertension among AA women poor obstetric outcomes), and all have an
and stillbirth compared with European is suggested by a comparison between increased frequency among AA.26,42-45
Americans.26 Similar findings were made African and European Americans without In a study of more than 5 million
in a large Wisconsin study recruited from chronic hypertension; the prevalence of births comparing birth outcomes be-
hospital discharge data. AA women had hypertension in pregnancy was similar, tween US-born and foreign-born
the highest risk for all the different types but AA women still had an increased women, women of African ancestry
of preeclampsia when compared with diagnosis of preeclampsia.40 Similar had the highest rates of infant mor-
European American women.27 Several findings were made much earlier by the tality, low birthweight, and preterm
other studies looking at risk factors Collaborative Perinatal project, which births, whether US born or foreign
TABLE 3
Preeclampsia studies among recent African immigrants to other countries
Cohort size Preeclampsia,
(total/Africans) OR or RR (95% CI) African origin Comments Location Reference
49
118,849/15,218 3.34 (2.25e4.96) Caribbean Adjusted for maternal characteristics Canada
49
118,849/9130 3.14 (2.04e4.83) SSA Adjusted for maternal characteristics Canada
50
2413/317 2.40 (1.10e5.60) SSA, Surinam, Univariate analysis The Netherlands
Antilles
51
2506/29 2.70 (1.20e6.20) Antilles Eclampsia in cases of SAMM, adjusted for The Netherlands
maternal characteristics and obstetric history
51
2506/90 6.20 (3.60e10.6) SSA Eclampsia in cases of SAMM, adjusted for The Netherlands
maternal characteristics and obstetric history
52
6215/331 2.06 (1.04e4.09) Cape Verde Adjusted for maternal characteristics and The Netherlands
obstetric history
52
6215/264 1.87 (0.86e4.06) Antilles Adjusted for maternal characteristics The Netherlands
and obstetric history
53
1728/576 2.47 (1.02e6.00) Ethiopia Standardized care between the groups Israel
compared
54
76,158/11,395 2.60 (2.32e2.92) Caribbean Adjusted for maternal characteristics United Kingdom
and obstetric history
55
8366/1581 3.64 (1.84e7.21) n.a. Adjusted for maternal characteristics United Kingdom
and obstetric history
15,639/356 0.90 (0.53e1.51)a SSA No increased risk Sweden 56
58
165,001/986 n.a. African, Somalia No increased risk Finland
526/158 3.90 (1.70e8.94)a SSA Early-onset PE compared to late onset France 68
born.46 In addition, the risk of pre- outcomes also apply to the Hispanic because these births often take place
term birth, stillbirth, and low birth- population in the United States, yet in countries with good records and uni-
weight is increased not only in AA several studies have noted that pre- versal health care systems (Table 3). For
women but also with AA fathers.47,48 eclampsia, low birthweight, and still- example, a large study of more than
Explanations for the disparities found birth are similar or even better than for 100,000 women who immigrated to
between women with African or Euro- white women, the Hispanic paradox.28,44 Ontario between 1985 and 2000 showed
pean ancestry have been poor socioeco- Using information from the Duke Uni- that the racial groups with the highest
nomic status with lower incomes and versity Birth Database, AA women had risk of severe preeclampsia were from
level of education, lack of medical in- higher rates of preeclampsia (10.2%) the Caribbean or SSA.49
surance, poor utilization of precon- than the European (8%) or Hispanic Similar findings were made in The
ception and antenatal services, stress, women (6.2%), even though the socio- Netherlands where the highest risk for
discrimination, and residential segre- economic status of Hispanic and AA eclampsia and preeclampsia was from
gation. Several reports have tried to women was similar.44 women from SSA.50,51 Cape Verdean and
determine the impact of these factors; Antillean women were also at higher risk
for example, women of African ancestry Preeclampsia among more recent of preeclampsia in a report from Rotter-
were at an increased risk of pre- African immigrants to other countries dam, The Netherlands.52 A large number
eclampsia in a second pregnancy, but Large numbers of Africans have migrated of Ethiopians have settled in Israel since
this was not associated with Medicaid to Europe and other high-income coun- the 1980s where prenatal and obstetric
enrollment.30 tries, mainly in the past 50 years. Ob- care is standardized with equal medical
Many of the socioeconomic factors stetric outcomes for these recent African insurance, and in this group severe pre-
that may contribute to poor obstetric immigrants are informative, particularly eclampsia was more likely to occur.53
Large groups of women of African Increased risk of other GOS, even if pregnancy, are also at increased risk.73-77
ancestry live in London where access preeclampsia does not occur, is also These findings of familial aggregation in
to National Health Service hospitals is clear from another large study in Swe- preeclampsia are also true for the other
freely available and home deliveries are den, and other reports support this GOS.78-81 Although environmental fac-
rare. In a survey of 80,000 pregnancies conclusion.35,63-66 tors, particularly influences acting in
that included women of European and Large studies of this kind are still not utero, are important, some of the risk is
Asian ancestry, 15% had African an- available for African women resident in likely to be genetic. Indeed, a study of
cestry, and this was the second strongest SSA, but our own experience in Kampala female twin pairs with known zygosity
risk factor for preeclampsia after chronic is that recurrent preeclampsia does occur estimated that the heritability of pre-
hypertension and also carried a higher frequently. In London, 23% of 500 eclampsia was approximately 54%.82
risk of other poor obstetric outcomes women with previous preeclampsia had Could there be particular susceptibility
such as FGR and stillbirth.54 Similarly, recurrent disease that required delivery genes associated with the higher fre-
African ancestry was a risk factor for before 37 weeks, and African compared quency of preeclampsia in women of
early-onset preeclampsia compared with with European ancestry was a significant African ancestry? A case-control study of
all other racial groups, and this remained predictor.67 It also seems that when preeclampsia in Latinas, a group with
so, even after adjusting for age, body preeclampsia does occur in the second admixture from European, African, and
mass index, and other maternal charac- pregnancy in AA women, it is severe, native Americans, did show, using
teristics.55 These and other studies of early-onset disease with associated FGR ancestry informative markers, that Afri-
African immigrants also highlight the and preterm birth.45 A recent study from can ancestry was associated with
increased risk of GOS such as stillbirths France suggests that women of African preeclampsia.83
and FGR similar to AA.56-58 ancestry are more at risk for early-onset The role of the fetal (father’s) genes is
preeclampsia and more likely to have less obvious, but many reports indicate a
Severity and recurrence had a previous history of preeclampsia paternal contribution to the risk.84-87
of preeclampsia compared with other groups, including Intergenerational and familial aggrega-
The early onset and severity of pre- women from North Africa, despite the tion also point to genetic factors derived
eclampsia in women from Uganda is also even higher incidence of chronic hyper- from both maternal and fetal genes, with
a cause of concern, although the latter tension in the latter group.68 most risk coming from maternal genes
may reflect the late admittance to Mulago that may act in either the mother or her
Hospital. In a US national hospital Summary fetus.71,74,77,88 A drive to look for the
discharge survey, higher mortality from Our comprehensive review of the liter- susceptibility genes for preeclampsia has
preeclampsia and eclampsia was reported ature identified very few papers that run so far been disappointing. The studies
among women of African ancestry counter to our conclusion that women of generally have small numbers of subjects
compared with European Americans, but African ancestry are at increased risk of and have not been replicated.89
only one-third or less of the difference developing preeclampsia. First, 3 studies Genome-wide association screening is
could actually be attributed to the higher showed that these women were not at an unbiased approach to look for sus-
prevalence.59 Pregnancy-related deaths increased risk of preeclampsia, but they ceptibility genes in complex disorders and
from preeclampsia/eclampsia were 3 had low power to detect any effect.56,58,69 has been used in preeclamptic cohorts,
times higher in AA women compared Second, the apparent increased suscep- but, although various single-nucleotide
with Europeans.60 tibility to preeclampsia among AA has polymorphism candidates have been
In the UK Maternal Death Review been dismissed as a problem of incorrect identified, the lack of statistical power is
for the period 2006-2008, 22 deaths diagnosis.37 Third, race was discounted again a problem.90-93 Systematic meta-
occurred as a result of preeclampsia and as a significant risk factor for pre- analyses of these studies found 7 single-
eclampsia. Despite being a minority eclampsia in another study, but data nucleotide polymorphisms significantly
group, 6 of these deaths were Africans regarding AA women were combined associated near genes involved in pro-
and the authors noted: “Black African with that for other minority races so that cesses such as coagulation, the renin-
women seem particularly susceptible to the analysis could not provide a mean- angiotensin system, and inflammation.
aggressive forms of preeclampsia. To ingful comparison.38 This highlights an important issue:
establish if this is true, and what might searching for variants associated with
be the underlying genetic or other Genetics of preeclampsia preeclampsia only in the maternal ge-
pathophysiological mechanisms, further That there is a genetic component nome will reveal genes mainly associated
research is required.”61 to preeclampsia has long been sus- with the tertiary systemic syndrome and
After a woman has had preeclampsia pected.70-72 Daughters of women with not those maternal and/or fetal genes
in her first pregnancy, the risk of recur- preeclampsia have more than twice the involved in physiological transformation
rence is increased, with a relative risk of risk of developing the disease them- of the arteries or to the subsequent stress
15.0 cited in an authoritative Norwegian selves, and sisters of affected women, response of the placenta to the reduced
study of more than 2 million women.62 even if not born from a preeclamptic blood flow. The clear increased risk of
20. Dekker GA. Risk factors for preeclampsia. 37. Chesley LC. History and epidemiology of 52. Bouthoorn SH, Gaillard R, Steegers EA,
Clin Obstet Gynecol 1999;42:422-35. preeclampsia-eclampsia. Clin Obstet Gynecol et al. Ethnic differences in blood pressure and
21. Roberts JM, Cooper DW. Pathogenesis and 1984;27:801-20. hypertensive complications during pregnancy:
genetics of pre-eclampsia. Lancet 2001;357: 38. Saftlas AF, Olson DR, Franks AL, Atrash HK, the Generation R study. Hypertension 2012;60:
53-6. Pokras R. Epidemiology of preeclampsia and 198-205.
22. Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Ventura SJ, et al. eclampsia in the United States, 1979-1986. Am 53. Salim R, Mfra A, Garmi G, Shalev E. Com-
Births: final data for 2009. Natl Vital Stat Rep J Obstet Gynecol 1990;163:460-5. parison of intrapartum outcome among immi-
2011;60:1-70. 39. Samadi AR, Mayberry RM, Zaidi AA, grant women from Ethiopia and the general
23. Tanaka M, Jaamaa G, Kaiser M, et al. Racial Pleasant JC, McGhee N Jr, Rice RJ. Maternal obstetric population in Israel. Int J Gynaecol
disparity in hypertensive disorders of pregnancy hypertension and associated pregnancy com- Obstet 2012;118:161-5.
in New York State: a 10-year longitudinal plications among African-American and other 54. Khalil A, Rezende J, Akolekar R,
population-based study. Am J Public Health women in the United States. Obstet Gynecol Syngelaki A, Nicolaides KH. Maternal racial
2007;97:163-70. 1996;87:557-63. origin and adverse pregnancy outcome: a
24. Shen JJ, Tymkow C, MacMullen N. Dis- 40. Bryant AS, Seely EW, Cohen A, cohort study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol
parities in maternal outcomes among four ethnic Lieberman E. Patterns of pregnancy-related 2013;41:278-85.
populations. Ethn Dis 2005;15:492-7. hypertension in black and white women. 55. Poon LC, Kametas NA, Chelemen T,
25. Zhang S, Cardarelli K, Shim R, Ye J, Hypertens Pregnancy 2005;24:281-90. Leal A, Nicolaides KH. Maternal risk factors for
Booker KL, Rust G. Racial disparities in eco- 41. Niswander KR, Gordon M. The women and hypertensive disorders in pregnancy: a multi-
nomic and clinical outcomes of pregnancy their pregnancies: the collaborative perinatal variate approach. J Hum Hypertens 2010;24:
among Medicaid recipients. Matern Child Health study of the National Institute of Neurological 104-10.
J 2013;17:1518-25. Diseases and Stroke. Philadelphia, PA: W. B. 56. Essen B, Hanson BS, Ostergren PO,
26. Zhang J, Meikle S, Trumble A. Severe Saunders Co; 1972. Lindquist PG, Gudmundsson S. Increased
maternal morbidity associated with hypertensive 42. MacDorman MF. Race and ethnic dispar- perinatal mortality among sub-Saharan immi-
disorders in pregnancy in the United States. ities in fetal mortality, preterm birth, and infant grants in a city-population in Sweden. Acta
Hypertens Pregnancy 2003;22:203-12. mortality in the United States: an overview. Obstet Gynecol Scand 2000;79:737-43.
27. Cabacungan ET, Ngui EM, McGinley EL. Semin Perinatol 2011;35:200-8. 57. Jenum AK, Sommer C, Sletner L, Morkrid K,
Racial/ethnic disparities in maternal morbidities: 43. Bryant AS, Worjoloh A, Caughey AB, Baerug A, Mosdol A. Adiposity and hyper-
a statewide study of labor and delivery hospi- Washington AE. Racial/ethnic disparities in ob- glycaemia in pregnancy and related health out-
talizations in Wisconsin. Matern Child Health J stetric outcomes and care: prevalence and comes in European ethnic minorities of Asian
2012;16:1455-67. determinants. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010;202: and African origin: a review. Food Nutr Res
28. Caughey AB, Stotland NE, Washington AE, 335-43. 2013:57.
Escobar GJ. Maternal ethnicity, paternal 44. Brown HL, Chireau MV, Jallah Y, Howard D. 58. Malin M, Gissler M. Maternal care and birth
ethnicity, and parental ethnic discordance: pre- The “Hispanic paradox”: an investigation of outcomes among ethnic minority women in
dictors of preeclampsia. Obstet Gynecol racial disparity in pregnancy outcomes at a ter- Finland. BMC Public Health 2009;9:84.
2005;106:156-61. tiary care medical center. Am J Obstet Gynecol 59. Tucker MJ, Berg CJ, Callaghan WM, Hsia J.
29. Abi-Said D, Annegers JF, Combs- 2007;197:197.e1-7; discussion 97.e7-9. The black-white disparity in pregnancy-related
Cantrell D, Frankowski RF, Willmore LJ. Case- 45. Mbah AK, Alio AP, Marty PJ, Bruder K, mortality from 5 conditions: differences in prev-
control study of the risk factors for eclampsia. Wilson R, Salihu HM. Recurrent versus isolated alence and case-fatality rates. Am J Public
Am J Epidemiol 1995;142:437-41. pre-eclampsia and risk of feto-infant morbidity Health 2007;97:247-51.
30. Mostello D, Catlin TK, Roman L, outcomes: racial/ethnic disparity. Eur J Obstet 60. MacKay AP, Berg CJ, Atrash HK. Preg-
Holcomb WL Jr, Leet T. Preeclampsia in the Gynecol Reprod Biol 2011;156:23-8. nancy-related mortality from preeclampsia and
parous woman: who is at risk? Am J Obstet 46. Singh GK, Yu SM. Adverse pregnancy out- eclampsia. Obstet Gynecol 2001;97:533-8.
Gynecol 2002;187:425-9. comes: differences between US- and foreign- 61. Cantwell R, Clutton-Brock T, Cooper G,
31. Eskenazi B, Fenster L, Sidney S. born women in major US racial and ethnic et al. Saving mothers’ lives: reviewing maternal
A multivariate analysis of risk factors for pre- groups. Am J Public Health 1996;86:837-43. deaths to make motherhood safer: 2006-2008.
eclampsia. JAMA 1991;266:237-41. 47. Palomar L, DeFranco EA, Lee KA, The Eighth Report of the Confidential Enquiries
32. Sibai BM, Ewell M, Levine RJ, et al. Risk Allsworth JE, Muglia LJ. Paternal race is a risk Into Maternal Deaths in the United Kingdom.
factors associated with preeclampsia in healthy factor for preterm birth. Am J Obstet Gynecol BJOG 2011;118(Suppl 1):1-203.
nulliparous women. The Calcium for Pre- 2007;197:152.e1-7. 62. Klungsoyr K, Morken NH, Irgens L,
eclampsia Prevention (CPEP) Study Group. Am 48. Srinivasjois RM, Shah S, Shah PS. Biracial Vollset SE, Skjaerven R. Secular trends in the
J Obstet Gynecol 1997;177:1003-10. couples and adverse birth outcomes: a sys- epidemiology of pre-eclampsia throughout 40
33. Larsen WI, Strong JE, Farley JH. Risk fac- tematic review and meta-analyses. Acta Obstet years in Norway: prevalence, risk factors and
tors for late postpartum preeclampsia. J Reprod Gynecol Scand 2012;91:1134-46. perinatal survival. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol
Med 2012;57:35-8. 49. Urquia ML, Ying I, Glazier RH, Berger H, De 2012;26:190-8.
34. Myatt L, Clifton RG, Roberts JM, et al. First- Souza LR, Ray JG. Serious preeclampsia 63. Hjartardottir S, Leifsson BG, Geirsson RT,
trimester prediction of preeclampsia in nullipa- among different immigrant groups. J Obstet Steinthorsdottir V. Recurrence of hypertensive
rous women at low risk. Obstet Gynecol Gynaecol Can 2012;34:348-52. disorder in second pregnancy. Am J Obstet
2012;119:1234-42. 50. Knuist M, Bonsel GJ, Zondervan HA, Gynecol 2006;194:916-20.
35. Mostello D, Kallogjeri D, Tungsiripat R, Treffers PE. Risk factors for preeclampsia in 64. van Rijn BB, Hoeks LB, Bots ML, Franx A,
Leet T. Recurrence of preeclampsia: effects of nulliparous women in distinct ethnic groups: a Bruinse HW. Outcomes of subsequent pregnancy
gestational age at delivery of the first pregnancy, prospective cohort study. Obstet Gynecol after first pregnancy with early-onset preeclamp-
body mass index, paternity, and interval between 1998;92:174-8. sia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006;195:723-8.
births. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008;199:55.e1-7. 51. Zwart JJ, Jonkers MD, Richters A, et al. 65. Wikstrom AK, Stephansson O, Cnattingius S.
36. Fong A, Chau CT, Pan D, Ogunyemi DA. Ethnic disparity in severe acute maternal Previous preeclampsia and risks of adverse
Clinical morbidities, trends, and demographics morbidity: a nationwide cohort study in The outcomes in subsequent nonpreeclamptic
of eclampsia: a population-based study. Am J Netherlands. Eur J Public Health 2011;21: pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011;204:
Obstet Gynecol 2013;209:229.e1-7. 229-34. 148.e1-6.
113. Handa VL, Lockhart ME, Fielding JR, et al. 118. Loftin R, Chen A, Evans A, Defranco E. Racial differences in the predictive value of the TDx fetal
Racial differences in pelvic anatomy by magnetic differences in gestational age-specific neonatal lung maturity assay. Am J Obstet Gynecol
resonance imaging. Obstet Gynecol 2008;111: morbidity: further evidence for different gestational 1996;175:73-7.
914-20. lengths. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012;206:259.e1-6. 123. Floros J, Fan R, Diangelo S, Guo X, Wert J,
114. Baragi RV, Delancey JO, Caspari R, 119. Patel RR, Steer P, Doyle P, Little MP, Luo J. Surfactant protein (SP) B associations
Howard DH, Ashton-Miller JA. Differences in Elliott P. Does gestation vary by ethnic group? A and interactions with SP-A in white and black
pelvic floor area between African American and London-based study of over 122,000 preg- subjects with respiratory distress syndrome.
European American women. Am J Obstet nancies with spontaneous onset of labour. Int J Pediatr Int 2001;43:567-76.
Gynecol 2002;187:111-5. Epidemiol 2004;33:107-13. 124. Parham P, Moffett A. Variable NK cell re-
115. Patriquin ML, Steyn M, Loth SR. Metric anal- 120. Balchin I, Whittaker JC, Lamont RF, ceptors and their MHC class I ligands in immu-
ysis of sex differences in South African black and Steer PJ. Timing of planned cesarean delivery nity, reproduction and human evolution. Nat Rev
white pelves. Forensic Sci Int 2005;147:119-27. by racial group. Obstet Gynecol 2008;111: Immunol 2013;13:133-44.
116. Steer PJ. The mechanisms and manage- 659-66. 125. Chi BH, Vwalika B, Killam WP, et al.
ment of normal labour. In: Chamberlain G, 121. Alexander GR, Hulsey TC, Robillard PY, Implementation of the Zambia electronic peri-
Steer P, eds. Turnbull’s obstetrics. London: De Caunes F, Papiernik E. Determinants of natal record system for comprehensive prenatal
Churchill Livingstone; 2001. meconium-stained amniotic fluid in term preg- and delivery care. Int J Gynaecol Obstet
117. Omigbodun AO, Adewuyi A. Duration of nancies. J Perinatol 1994;14:259-63. 2011;113:131-6.
human singleton pregnancies in Ibadan, Nigeria. 122. Berman S, Tanasijevic MJ, Alvarez JG, 126. Kaplan M. Genomics in Africa: avoiding
J Natl Med Assoc 1997;89:617-21. Ludmir J, Lieberman E, Richardson DK. Racial past pitfalls. Cell 2011;147:11-3.