Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

4icee-Stmf Goel Prenst

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 18

Performance-Based Seismic Design of

Special Truss Moment Frames (STMFs)

Shih-Ho Chao
(Post-Doctoral Research Fellow, University of Michigan, USA)

Subhash C. Goel
(Professor, University of Michigan, USA)

Presentation at 4ICEE, Taipei, Taiwan, October 12-13, 2006

1
Conventional Truss Moment Frame

•Economical for large spans


•Easy end connections for moment resistance
•Openings for ductwork – Smaller story heights
2
3
Special Truss Moment Frames (Design Criteria: AISC
Seismic Provisions 2005, Section 12)

Plastic Hinges

θp θp

Fi Fi

hi hi
Special Segment

with X-diagonal web without web members in special


members in special segment segment (Vierendeel type)
4
Previous Experimental Results (Goel et al., 1991, 1994)

5
6
Current Seismic Design Practice
„ Design Base Shear
V = Ce W(I/R)

„ Elastic Design/Analysis

„ Drift Check
Cd Δ < Δlimit

„ Prescribed Ductility Detailing

„ Pushover Assessment

(Works most of the time – But not always!)


7
Performance-Based Plastic Design (PBPD) Method
1. Design Base Shear

Work-Energy Equation:

8
For the given system,

Akiyama (1985)

Using Newmark-Hall Inelastic Spectra (Rm-ms-T) for E-P SDOF,

Solution of Work-Energy Equation fi Design Base Shear

Ref: Housner (1956, 1960)


9
Inelastic response spectra
proposed by Newmark and
Hall [1973]

Energy modification factor


versus period

10
2. A Seismic Design Lateral Force Distribution Based on
Inelastic State of Structures (Chao, Goel, and Lee; 2006):

Shear Distribution Factor

11
3. Plastic Design Method (for proportioning chord
members in special segment):

wiu
Fi = (βi − βi+1 ) Fn External Work = Internal Work

θp π L βi M pbr
− θp
2 Ls
hi

Ls
M pc M pc

Pre-Selected Yield Mechanism


12
4. Design of Members outside the Special Segments
(Capacity Design Approach):
Maximum Expected Shear force
in the middle of special segment:

( Pc )i wiu ( Pc )i wiu
(Vne )i (Vne )i
αi FL αi FR

hi hi

M pc M pc

L/2 L/2 L/2

Exterior “Column Tree” Interior “Column Tree”


13
Design of Example 9-story STMF:
1. NEHRP 2000 design spectrum.
2. Two-level design: Pre-selected target story drift = 2% (under 10% in
50 years hazard); 3% (under 2% in 50 years hazard).
3. No R, I, Cd, are needed for design since inelastic behavior is accounted for
directly in PBPD.
4. Generally no pushover analysis or iteration is required after design.
Ls = 8'

14
Typical Drift Responses (10%/50yr and 2%/50 yr Hazards)
Nonlinear Dynamic Analyses:
Floor Level

Note: all yielding occurred within special segments


only (i.e. intended yield mechanism achieved)
15
Relative Story Shear Distributions Obtained from
Nonlinear Dynamic Analyses:

16
In Summary…
1. The new seismic design procedure (PBPD) using
energy and plastic design concepts, and pre-selected
yield mechanism and target drift as performance
criteria, has been successfully applied to STMF to
achieve the desired performance objectives, such as
target drifts, intended yield mechanism, etc.

2. R, I, and Cd, are not needed for design since inelastic


behavior is accounted for directly in PBPD. No iterative
evaluation or refinement, such as by nonlinear static
(pushover) or dynamic analysis after initial design, is
needed either.

17
THANK YOU

18

You might also like