Science for Environment Policy

IN-DEPTH REPORT:
Indicators
for Sustainable Cities
November 2015
(revised March 2018)
Issue 12

Environment
Figures This In-depth Report is written by INTRASOFT International
and edited by the Science Communication Unit, University of
Figure 1: Venn diagram representing the standard dimensions 7 the West of England (UWE), Bristol
of sustainable development. Adapted from Tanguay, 2009, and Email: sfep.editorial@uwe.ac.uk
referencing concepts proposed in WCED, 1987.
Figure 2: The urban sustainability index: A new tool for 12
measuring China’s cities, Urban China Initiative, a joint To cite this publication:
initiative of Tsinghua University, Columbia University, and Science for Environment Policy (2018) Indicators for sustainable
cities. In-depth Report 12. Produced for the European
McKinsey & Company, November 2010, p. 11
Commission DG Environment by the Science Communication
(www.urbanchinainitiative.typepad.com/files/usi.pdf ) Unit, UWE, Bristol. Available at:
Figure 3: The Urban Metabolism Framework. Minx, J., 13 http://ec.europa.eu/science-environment-policy
Creutzig, F., Ziegler, T., & Owen, A. (2011). Developing a
pragmatic approach to assess urban metabolism in Europe (No.
1-2011) (Vol. 240, pp. 1–83). Berlin.
Figure 4: Green City Tool Draft Interface. 14 Acknowledgements
Figure 5: The European Green City Index. Siemens AG. http:// 15 We wish to thank Marie Cugny-Seguin, Project Manager of
www.siemens.com/entry/cc/en/greencityindex.htm Urban and Territorial Issues at the European Environment
Figure 6: Urban Ecosystem Europe. Berrini, M. & Bono, L. 19 Agency, for her input into this report. Final responsibility for
(2007) Urban Ecosystem Europe, Ambiente Italia. the content and accuracy of the report, however, lies solely with
the authors.
Tables

Table 1: Scalable, easy-to-use indicator frameworks, sets and 11

tools
Erratum notice
Table 2: Headline indicator set proposed by the European 13
This In-Depth Report was revised and updated
Environmental Agency
in March 2018, to include new information
Table 3: Sustainable Cities International’s indicator list 17
about the European Green Capital and Green
Table 4: The European Foundation’s Urban Sustainability 19-20 Leaf Awards, the Covenant of Mayors, the DGNB
Indicators Certification Scheme and the SDEWES Index, and
Table 5: A list of other applicable tools. 20-21 to update weblinks.

Images
About Science for Environment Policy

Horizontal illutration of a big European city ©iStock.com/ 5 Science for Environment Policy is a free news
Vertyr and information service published by the European
View of Paris ©iStock.com/MmeEmil 10 Commission’s Directorate-General Environment,
City Drawing ©iStock.com/blindspot 23 which provides the latest environmental policy-
relevant research findings.

In-depth Reports are a feature of the service

which provide comprehensive overviews of
scientific research relevant to a specific policy
area. In addition to In-depth Reports, Science
for Environment Policy also publishes a weekly
News Alert which is delivered by email to
subscribers and provides accessible summaries
of key scientific studies.

http://ec.europa.eu/science-environment-policy
ISBN: 978-92-79-85127-8
ISSN: 2363-2798 Keep up-to-date
DOI: 10.2779/121865
Subscribe to Science for Environment Policy’s
weekly News Alert by emailing:
sfep@uwe.ac.uk
The contents and views included in Science for Environment
Policy are based on independent research and do not necessarily Or sign up online at:
reflect the position of the European Commission. http://ec.europa.eu/science-environment-policy
© European Union 2018
Science for Environment Policy
Indicators for Sustainable Cities

Contents
Executive summary: Urban 5 4. Other potentially useful tools 20
Indicators for Sustainable BREEAM Communities 21
Cities Climate+ Development 21
Programme
1. Introduction 6 Covenant of Mayors 21
1.1 Urban metabolism 6 DGNB Certification Scheme 21
1.2 Urban sustainability 6 The Eco2 Cities Initiative 22
1.3 How are sustainable cities 7 Eurostat Sustainable 22
created? Development Indicators
Green Cities 22
2. Choosing appropriate urban 8 Programme (OECD)
sustainability indicators Green Star 22
LEED-ND 22
3. Scalable, easy-to-use indicator 11 NABERS 22
frameworks SDEWES Index 22
China Urban Sustainability Index 12 SynCity 23
City Blueprints 12 Urban Indicators Guidelines 23
EEA Urban Metabolism Framework 13
European Green Capital Award 14 5. Summary 23
European Green City Tool 14
European Green City Index 15 6. References 23
European Green Leaf Award 16
Global City Indicators Facility 16
Indicators for Sustainability 16
Reference Framework for Sustainable 16
Cities
STAR Community Rating System 18
Urban Audit Cities Statistics 18
Urban Ecosystem Europe 18
Urban Sustainability Indicators 19
I N D I C A T O R S F O R S U S T A I N A B L E C I T I E S
5

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Urban indicators for

sustainable cities
Urban sustainability indicators are tools that allow city planners, city managers and policymakers
to gauge the socio-economic and environmental impact of, for example, current urban designs,
infrastructures, policies, waste disposal systems, pollution and access to services by citizens. They
allow for the diagnosis of problems and pressures, and thus the identification of areas that would profit
from being addressed through good governance and science-based responses. They also allow cities to
monitor the success and impact of sustainability interventions.

A myriad of indicator tools have been advanced and tested situations of cities are addressed, along with real-world case
in real cities by various organisations and research groups. studies that demonstrate how they can be implemented.
These tools are available for implementation by others, and
usually include aspects of sustainable development beyond In Chapter 1 and Chapter 2, the concept of urban
environmental dimensions only, such as public health and metabolism is clarified in the context of environmental,
services, governance, income, business opportunities, and social and economic sustainability, and information on
transport. how to choose an appropriate indicator set is provided.
Chapter 3 reviews simple, scalable indicator tools, and
The challenge for urban authorities is deciding which other useful indicator programmes and approaches are
tool best addresses the needs and goals of a particular city, covered in Chapter 4.
which would be easy to implement and which are worth
the financial and human effort. In some cases, a selection It is important to note that an exhaustive list of all available
of different tools may be desirable for a city home to a tools, and a comprehensive evaluation of each is beyond
small population; in others, a large city may want to join the scope of this report. However, as far as possible, further
an established global programme of indicators. reading suggestions and contact details of the relevant
organisations that could assist with implementation or
This report aims to provide local government actors and information is provided.
stakeholders with a concise guide to the best currently
available indicator tools for sustainable cities, focusing
on the environmental dimension. The tools summarised
herein were chosen based on scalability and ease of use,
and the positive and negative aspects of each for different
 I N D I C A T O R S F O R S U S T A I N A B L E C I T I E S
6

1.Introduction
1.1 Urban metabolism 1.2 Urban sustainability
Animals convert food, water and oxygen into energy The main challenge for today’s cities is to manage the
and waste products like urine and carbon dioxide. The heavy dependence on ecosystem services, which results
energy produced may be used to perform activities like in the depletion of natural resources and biodiversity and
moving, breathing or thinking, or it may be stored the efforts to mitigate and adapt to climate change, while
for later. These processes form part of the animal’s prioritising public health and quality of life.
metabolism — to stay alive and functioning, it requires
resources and it generates waste products. According to Kennedy et al. (2007), a sustainable city can
only be one for which the inflow of material and energy
In much the same way, cities need energy, materials, resources, and the disposal of wastes, do not exceed the
water and nutrients to provide sustenance and shelter to capacity of the city’s surrounding environment. In other
its citizens, to produce goods and services, to grow and words, for achieving environmental sustainability urban
to eliminate waste and pollution (Kennedy, Cuddihy & consumption must match or be below what the natural
Engel-Yan, 2007). environment — such as forests, soil and water bodies—
can provide, and the resulting pollutants must not
And, in the same way that an animal’s metabolism is overwhelm the environment’s ability to provide resources
the result of cooperation between the brain, organs and to humans and other members of the ecosystem.
enzymes, urban metabolism is facilitated by the city’s
governance policies, its infrastructure, and its citizens. Based on the reports summarised in later chapters of this
report, researchers agree that sustainability depends on
More and more of the world’s people are moving social, economic, environmental and governance factors.
to cities, which must expand at a rapid rate to
accommodate the influx (Kötter & Friesecke, 2011). For example, economic productivity depends on healthy,
Bigger cities demand more food, water and fuel which happy citizens, who need easy access to education,
in turn causes an increase in emissions, refuse and healthcare, security, food, water, transport, clean air and
wastewater production (Kennedy, Cuddihy & Engel- electricity.
Yan, 2007). Unfortunately, this means that while urban
systems depend on ecosystem services (Millennium Such an ideal situation can be created when cities build
Ecosystem Assessment, 2005) to thrive, they also efficient waste disposal systems, green spaces and green
threaten those same ecosystems through resource-use, buildings, public transport and attract employers
land encroachment and pollution. producing green products from local resources for regional
markets. Here, the behaviours and lifestyle of city-dwellers
In fact, the modern urban metabolic cycle drives plays a role.
environmental change on a local-to-global scale,
affecting land-use and cover, biodiversity, hydrosystems, It is also important that cities reduce natural resource
biogeochemical cycles and climate (Grimm et al., consumption (including water and materials like stone
2008). and gravel) and waste production footprints, and
Many of these environmental consequences lead to that they improve land-use efficiencies (especially the
new large-scale problems that impact on economic reuse of greyfield and brownfield land) so that negative
activity and public health. Population density increases, environmental impacts are minimised.
socio-economic disparities may be exacerbated
and infrastructure problems could arise (Kötter & In addition, urban system stakeholders must consider how
Friesecke, 2011). As such, researchers emphasise the resources get into the city. How far away are the farms that
value of understanding efficient urban metabolism in supply meat and fresh produce? What mode of transport
the context of sustainable city planning (Chrysoulakis, is used to carry materials? Must water be pumped into the
de Castro & Moors, 2014). city from a low-lying area?
I N D I C A T O R S F O R S U S T A I N A B L E C I T I E S
7

Finally, an integrated approach to urban governance that Figure 1, adapted from Tanguay, 2009) illustrates the
extends past urban limits to the surrounding area is essential necessary integration. Other depictions might set these
to promote a sustainable dynamic relationship between elements in concentric circles; economic inside social inside
humans and their environment, ensuring that both quality environmental. Yet others (Adams, 2006) would emphasise
of life and eco-friendly businesses are promoted, which also that the environmental elements need to expand in order
sustains economic prosperity in the long run. to match the size of the other two circles. All, however,
show that the practical realisation of sustainability can only
The European Environment Agency (EEA) uses the ‘DPSIR’ happen in the overlap — the dynamic — between the 3
(Driving forces, Pressures, States, Impacts, Responses) fundamental elements.
framework (Gabrielsen & Bosch, 2003) to structure and
classify environmental indicators along the causal chain from
socio-economic causes to political and societal responses. 1.3 How are sustainable
However, this approach has its limits when it comes to
representing the complex interplay between environmental,
cities created?
socio-economic and governance factors — for example, In other words, to create a sustainable urban environment,
discrepancies have been found in the definition of DPSIR’s it is crucial to measure and assess policies, infrastructure,
information categories (Gari et al., 2015; Cooper, 2012). socio-economic factors, resource use, emissions and any
It cannot therefore be deemed suitable to provide the base other processes that contribute to and profit from the city’s
structure for sustainability indicators. metabolism, prosperity and quality of life. This will allow city
planning authorities officials, and governments in general,
A widely accepted venn diagram, depicting environmental, to identify areas of opportunity as well as concern, and to
social and economic aspects of sustainability (see respond by developing realistic sustainability goals with a
long-term perspective.

The following chapters of this In-

depth Report provide an overview
of a number of established urban
sustainability indicators that would
be relatively simple to implement
by urban planning authorities.
The tools and systems presented
were selected based on scalability
(in terms of city size and access to
resources), ease-of-use and support
for implementation.

The results of suitable urban

sustainability indicators, in
combination with models, case
studies and other research can
inform urban policies geared
toward reaching sustainability
goals, and further use of
indicators allow for ongoing
assessments of interventions.
That is to say indicators are a
key tool for driving science-
based urban planning and
management.

Figure 1. Venn diagram representing the standard dimensions of sustainable

development. Adapted from Tanguay, 2009, and referencing concepts proposed in
WCED, 1987.
 I N D I C A T O R S F O R S U S T A I N A B L E C I T I E S
8

2. Choosing appropriate urban

sustainability indicators
Definitions
Parameter: a property that is measured or observed.
Variable: an element, feature, or factor that is liable to vary or change
Data set: a collection of parameters that have been measured; usually the source of the specific
data used by indicators.
Indicator: a parameter, or a value derived from parameters, which points to, provides information
about, and/or describes the state of a phenomenon/environment/area, with a significance extending
beyond that directly associated with a parameter value.
Analysis framework: a basic structure underlying a system, concept, or text, used to characterise
the major issues to be monitored using indicators. Examples include the Pressure-State-
Response (PSR) and the Driving forces, Pressure, State, Impact, Response (DPSIR) frameworks for
environmental policies.
Index: a set of aggregated or weighted parameters or indicators.
Indicator set: an agreement that defines the overall objectives and outputs that are measured
using a selection of indicators.

In this report the term ‘tools’ is often used as an umbrella term for the definitions above.
(Gabrielsen & Bosch, 2003; Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, 2003)

be found is this: all of these frameworks endeavour to

promote sustainable urban development by aggregating
According to the Food and Agriculture Organization of diverse information into focussed and applicable
the United Nations, indicators allow for the measurement knowledge (Hiremath et al., 2013). Indicator frameworks
of change in a system: achieve this by reducing the data required to illustrate
urban sustainability, and allow communication of that
“Indicators are selected to provide information information with diverse audiences (Keirstead, 2007).
about the functioning of a specific system, for a
specific purpose — to support decision-making It is important that decision-makers trust in and
and management. An indicator quantifies and understand the indicators that inform policies. The
aggregates data that can be measured and monitored sheer number and diversity of indicator frameworks
to determine whether change is taking place. But can, however, be overwhelming (Zavadskas et al., 2007),
in order to understand the process of change, the and there are significant differences in methodology,
indicator needs to help decision-makers understand conceptual framework or even general approach to the
why change is taking place.” topic (Hammond et al., 1995; Ramos, Caeiro & de Melo,
(Indicators – what are they?, FAO, 2002) 2004; Moreno Pires, Fidélis & Ramos, 2014).

Policymakers and city managers are today faced with a How, then, to choose between these frameworks?
great array of available sustainability indicator frameworks. Perhaps the most useful way to start is by understanding
These vary in their fundamental purpose, their approach the various purposes for which indicators can be used.
to measuring sustainability, their scale, and of course, Fundamentally, they can be applied in three ways: as
their selection of indicators. The common ground to explanatory tools,7 pilot tools, or performance assessment
tools (Shen et al., 2011).
I N D I C A T O R S F O R S U S T A I N A B L E C I T I E S
9

The European Green Capital Award (EGCA; Berrini & 2013). Some researchers have observed that EU indicator
Bono, 2011) is an example of an explanatory tool: where a systems put little focus on social and governance aspects
well-defined set of indicators has been collated in order to of sustainable development (Adelle & Pallemaerts, 2009),
evaluate the current state of the environmental dimension while others say that social and economic considerations
of sustainability in a city or urban area. In doing so, the are under-represented (Lynch et al., 2011). Almost all
EGCA highlights good practices in order to promote indicator sets and indices place an emphasis on the
them. As such, the EGCA also falls into the category of environmental aspect of sustainability, sometimes to the
pilot tools, which refers to indicators chosen specifically detriment of the other categories (Shen et al., 2011).
to assist policymaking. Other examples of pilot tools Generally speaking, and importantly, most indicator sets
include City Blueprints (van Leeuwen et al., 2012), Urban do not capture how the pillars of sustainability are linked
Sustainability Indicators (Mega & Pedersen, 1998). (Adinyira, Oteng-seifah & Adjei-kumi, 2007).

The last use-category is by far the most populated, and Less fundamental issues faced when choosing an indicator
in fact, performance assessment is widely regarded as set include standardisation and data availability. As
the most important role for sustainability indicators performance assessment is one of the main purposes for
(Hiremath et al., 2013). The frameworks that fall into this using sustainability indicators, it is important to be able
category are too many to mention, but notable examples to compare performance between similar urban areas. In
include the Global City Indicators Programme (http:// this way, indicator sets can be validated and improved,
www.citiesalliance.org/node/2529), and the Reference shedding light on complex and abstract policy issues
Framework for Sustainable Cities (http://rfsc.eu/), a (Yigitcanlar & Lönnqvist, 2013).
toolkit based on the characteristics of cities.
Standardisation also contributes to improved collaboration
The next challenge in selecting an indicator framework is in and knowledge sharing within and between local
agreeing what constitutes a representative indicator set or governments (Moreno Pires, Fidélis & Ramos, 2014).
index, or even the categories that are most important when
measuring progress towards sustainable development. It must be noted however that the standardisation of
There is some consensus that the four dimensions, or indicators between cities remains an issue, and this
‘pillars’, of sustainable development are environmental, raises the question of what precisely constitutes a city?
economic, social, and governance (Hiremath et al., The answer is unfortunately beyond the scope of this
discussion.
Data availability is another important aspect to consider
Important considerations for when selecting an indicator system. These frameworks are
designed by a range of groups and individuals, such as
using indicators government agencies, non-governmental organisations
and universities, to name a few (Sébastien & Bauler, 2013).
- Without good data, based on monitoring, it is The result is that there is often little or no consideration
not possible to develop indicators.
of what data is readily available when the indicator set
- Performance measures imply that targets need
to be set (i.e. against which performance can be is proposed. City Blueprints is a classic example: despite
compared). explicitly planning the indicator set around publically
- Different people living in different places have available data, they struggled to obtain the data required
different values. Indicators must therefore be able to complete the assessment of Rotterdam’s water
to take into account different locations, people, sustainability (van Leeuwen et al., 2012). Pires et al.
cultures and institutions. (2014) cite unsuitable or unavailable data sources as one
- Sets of indicators evolve over time. of the most common failings of indicator systems.
- Sets of indicators are seldom, if ever, complete.
- Measurement of indicators tends to reduce It would perhaps be valuable at this point to discuss what
uncertainty, but does not eliminate it. aspects of indicator systems are desirable. One thing that
- Indicators can play an important role in how is widely agreed upon is that indicator sets need to be
human activities influence the environment —
locally-relevant — they need to work at the scale (size,
changing the indicators will most likely also
change the system. physical lay-out, and organisational structure) of the city
or municipality (Campbell, 1996; Camagni, 2002). The
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the indicator framework chosen must reflect the geographical
United Nations, 2002

1
 I N D I C A T O R S F O R S U S T A I N A B L E C I T I E S
10

and social context of the urban area in question “well-founded, limited in number, broad in
(Moreno Pires, Fidélis & Ramos, 2014; Hiremath et coverage of Agenda 211 goals, obtainable at
al., 2013). a reasonable cost–benefit ratio, using data
published officially, and must be able to reflect
Another important observation is that indicators with every aspect of urban development.” Finally,
broad political support have been more successful Hiremath et al. (2013) suggest that indicators
than those proposed by academic institutions or should be “policy relevant, scientifically founded,
non-government agencies (Hiremath et al., 2013). readily implantable, and useful for planning
Logically, this is because indicators are selected to purposes.”
inform policies that are defined by policymakers; the
argument is that policymakers, along with those who Taken together, these give a clear indication of the
are affected by these policies, are in the best position theoretical strengths of an indicator system. Most
to predict the potential success and sustainability of importantly, though, is that an indicator system needs
new regulations and interventions. to address the sustainability needs of the city where it
is being implemented (Shen et al., 2011).
Proceeding to the more technical aspects of these
frameworks, several lists of desirable qualities for Providing a comprehensive guide to choosing an
indicators have been put forward. Mega and Pedersen indicator system is beyond the scope of this report.
(1998) suggested that indicators should be clear, However, the above points cover the most pertinent
simple, scientifically sound, and reproducible. Cash et aspects of how a policymaker could go about selecting
al. (2003) define three criteria for the usability of any an appropriate framework for a given urban area. The
given indicator: salience, credibility and legitimacy. following chapters provide some indication of which
Zavadskas et al. (2007) in turn suggest that a set tools are available, easy to scale and relatively simple
should be to apply.
I N D I C A T O R S F O R S U S T A I N A B L E C I T I E S
11

3. Scalable, easy-to-use indicator

frameworks
A number of indicator tools are described below. They are discussed in alphabetical order, as per Table 1, and each
summary includes a description of where the tool is relevant, its pros and cons for different situations and goals
of cities, how easy it is to apply, how scalable it is, and any other unique information. In addition, links to online
resources and tools are provided, and many include case studies that demonstrate the application of the tool. Most
tools originate in Europe and were designed for European cities. Where this is not the case, it is indicated in the text.

Indicator/Toolkit: Organisation: Read More:

China Urban Sustainability Urban China Initiative http://www.urbanchinainitiative.org/

Index en/resources/report.html
City Blueprint Waternet Amsterdam; KWR https://www.kwrwater.nl/en/tools-
Water Cycle Research Institute producten/city-blueprint/
EEA Urban Metabolism European Environment Agency http://ideas.climatecon.tu-
Framework berlin.de/documents/wpaper/
CLIMATECON-2011-01.pdf
European Green Capital European Commission http://ec.europa.eu/environment/
Award europeangreencapital/about-the-award/
European Green City Tool European Union http://ec.europa.eu/environment/
urban/tool.htm
European Green City Index Economist Intelligence Unit; http://www.siemens.com/press/pool/
Siemens de/events/corporate/2009-12-Cop15/
European_Green_City_Index.pdf
European Green Leaf Award European Union http://ec.europa.eu/environment/
europeangreencapital/
europeangreenleaf/
Global City Indicators Global City Indicators Facility http://www.citiesalliance.org/
Program node/2529
Indicators for Sustainability Sustainable Cities International http://sustainablecities.net/
Reference Framework for RFSC http://www.rfsc.eu/
Sustainable Cities (RFSC)
STAR Community Rating Sustainability Tools for http://www.starcommunities.org/
System Assessing and Rating rating-system/
Communities (STAR)
Urban Audit Cities Statistics Eurostat http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/cities
Urban Ecosystem Europe - International Council for Local http://informedcities.eu/
Informed Cities Environmental Initiatives
(ICLEI); Ambiente Italia
Urban Sustainability Indicators European Foundation for the https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/sites/
Improvement of Living and default/files/ef_files/pubdocs/1998/07/
Working Conditions. en/1/ef9807en.pdf

Table 1: Scalable, easy-to-use indicator frameworks, sets and tools.

 I N D I C A T O R S F O R S U S T A I N A B L E C I T I E S
12

China Urban Sustainability Index

The China Urban Sustainability Index (Li et al., 2014), Emphasis is placed on society and environmental
funded by the Urban China Initiative, is a report into the indicators through a weighting system. The strength
sustainability of nearly 200 Chinese cities. of the CSI Indicator set is that it is a tool to quantify
urban growth and development, rather than a static
The indicator set was developed from the 2011 China benchmarking tool. However, the report is not clear on
Sustainability Index as well as the China Urbanisation Index, what data was used for the evaluation.
using the indicator framework set out in the 2011 CSI. It
is an extremely scalable tool, as it was developed for cities The report can be downloaded at http://www.
ranging in size from 200 000 people to 20 million people. urbanchinainitiative.org/en/resources/index.html.

Figure 2:
China Urban
Sustainability Index

A summary of China’s
urban sustainability
compared to developed
world standards, based
on data from 185
Chinese cities. Little
emphasis is placed on
governance.

City Blueprints pollution (not including air pollution), with less attention
paid to governance and long-term sustainability. The set
City Blueprints is a tool developed by Waternet Amsterdam does incorporate some indicators of health, but only uses
and the KWR Water Cycle Research Institute to provide a indicators that are related to water (such as water quality
quick scan and baseline assessment of water sustainability and sanitation.)
in a city. The overall aim is to provide European city
managers and other stakeholders with the base knowledge City Blueprints attaches a score of 0–10 to each indicator,
to implement integrated urban water management and where 0 indicates poor performance and 10 indicates
thereby contribute to overall sustainability. excellent performance requiring no further attention.
This simplified approach also allows for easy comparison
The tool consists of 24 indicators, subdivided into eight between cities.
broad categories: (1) water security following the water
footprint approach developed by Hoekstra and Chapagain The output of the tool is a spider-web diagram that clearly
(2007), (2) water quality, which includes surface water indicates regions of good performance and concern. The
and groundwater, (3) drinking water, (4) sanitation, (5) indicators were tested in a case study in three Netherlands
infrastructure, (6) climate robustness, (7) biodiversity and cities, namely Rotterdam, Maastricht, and Venlo (van
attractiveness and (8) governance. Leeuwen et al., 2012). This paper also contains brief
guidelines for stakeholders on how the findings of a City
Indicators were selected for ease of use: calculation and Blueprints assessment could be implemented.
scoring is easy, and they aimed to base the indicators To implement the tool in your city, visit the website
on easily accessible public data. The City Blueprints at https://www.kwrwater.nl/en/tools-producten/city-
indicator set places its focus on resource use and waste and blueprint/.
I N D I C A T O R S F O R S U S T A I N A B L E C I T I E S
13

No. Description Dimension

H1 Per capita CO2 emissions from energy consumption Urban Flows
H2 Energy efficiency of transport Urban Flows
H3 Efficiency of residential energy use Urban Flows
H4 Efficiency of urban water use Urban Flows
H5 Waste intensity Urban Flows
H6 Recycling Urban Flows
H7 Urban land take Urban Flows
H8 Green space access Urban Quality
H9 NO2 concentrations Urban Quality
H10 PM10 concentrations Urban Quality
H11 Unemployment rate Urban Quality
H12 Land use efficiency Urban Patterns
H13 Public transport network length Urban Patterns
H14 Registered cars Urban Drivers
H15 GDP per capita Urban Drivers
Table 2: Headline indicator set proposed by the European Environmental Agency

EEA Urban Metabolism Framework

The European Environmental Agency has studied the measure of how sustainable a city is. It is informative at
possibility of developing an Urban Metabolism indicator a European level rather than at an individual-city level.
system. This is a way to evaluate the sustainability of a city Implementation of this indicator system will require
based in metabolic flows rather than performance or current contacting the EEA (http://www.eea.europa.eu/).
status.

The report (Minx et al.,

2010) collated a wide range
of indicators from various
frameworks such as Urban
Ecosystem Europe, all of
which are based on publically
available municipal datasets
(the authors of the report
chose to use existing data to
make the indicator set easier
to implement). From this, they
have generated a headline data
set of 15 indicators, which were
chosen to be representative of
the larger set.

This set provides low-cost,

continuous monitoring of
urban metabolism in European
cities. In addition, the report
proposes a scaling framework
to allow the tool to be used in
cities of various sizes.

The strength of this framework Figure 3: The Urban Metabolism Framework. The Urban Metabolism Framework
is in its simplicity and its use of was tested on three representative cities: Barcelona, Freiburg, and Malmo. This
readily available data sources; spider diagram shows how each of them compare based on 15 indicators of
however it does not provide sustainability. This visualisation makes comparing cities easy and straightforward.
the most comprehensive
 I N D I C A T O R S F O R S U S T A I N A B L E C I T I E S
14

European Green Capital Award 3. Sustainable Urban Mobility

4. Sustainable Land Use
The European Green Capital Award is an annual award that 5. Nature and Biodiversity
recognises an outstanding commitment to environmental 6. Air Quality
practices in one European city (Berrini & Bono, 2011). 7. Noise
Cities are required to have at least 100 000 inhabitants to 8. Waste
participate, but there is no upper limit. 9. Water
10. Green Growth and Eco-innovation
Participating cities are judged on an evolving indicator set: 11. Energy Performance
12 indicator areas that cover environmental categories of 12. Governance
urban environmental sustainability such as waste and water
management, land use, air quality and climate change The European Green Capital Award has run since 2008
adaptation and mitigation. The tool is less focussed on with the first winner of the title in 2010. Every year,
economic measures of sustainability. Emphasis is placed several reports are issued, such as the technical assessment
long-term strategies for the cities’ future, and concrete of each applicant city per indicator area, and a selection of
strategies that have been prepared in a holistic way with good practices to inspire other cities.
all stakeholders and departments involved.
Detailed information on how shortlisted cities were
For the 2021 award cycle, these 12 environmental assessed as well as on the award in general is available here:
indicators are: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/europeangreencapital/
1. Climate Change: Mitigation
2. Climate Change: Adaptation

European Green City Tool

This self-assessment tool looks at city governance (so it represents yes/no answers about the approach a city is taking
and is not about quantitative, scalar indicators) in the 12 indicator areas covered by the European Green Capital Award.
The intention of this tool is to be accessible for cities with different levels of knowledge and experience in assessing the
environmental performance of their city. It is aimed at both those who have little knowledge as well as those who have
taken strides to improve their performance. The data will not be shared and full confidentiality is guaranteed for user
cities, other than the collection of generic data for benchmarking. The tool will also offer guidance, and suggest policy
actions that other EU cities (in similar situations) have taken.

Cities should
be able to use
the results in
communication
with citizens,
investors or other
stakeholders if they
wish.

Figure 4: Green
City Tool Draft
Interface.
I N D I C A T O R S F O R S U S T A I N A B L E C I T I E S
15

European Green City Index

The European Green City Index is an evaluation of The indicator set is structured to use publically available
the environmental sustainability of 30 European cities data (with the notable exception of CO2 emissions, which
ranging in size from less than 1 million people to more are not well-reported in many European cities), and each
than 3 million people (Watson, 2009). indicator is normalised to allow comparison between
cities.
As part of the evaluation (conducted by the Economist
Intelligence Unit in cooperation with Siemens), an This indicator system was not intended for widespread
expert panel developed a set of 30 indicators to compare use, but could easily be adapted to the task of evaluating
these cities. The indicator set comprehensively covers all other cities.
major areas of urban environmental sustainability, with a
particular emphasis on energy and CO2 emissions. To learn more, go to https://www.siemens.com/press/
Little attention, however, is paid to measures of health, pool/de/events/corporate/2009-12-Cop15/European_
happiness and quality-of-life. The indicators are divided Green_City_Index.pdf.
into quantitative indicators, which measure the cities’
current performance, and qualitative indicators which
cover the aspirations and commitments of a city to
sustainable practices.

Figure 5: The European Green City Index

The European Green City Index report presents a fact sheet or profile for each city. This approach highlights the successes
and shortcomings of environmental sustainable development in each of the 30 cities in the Index. Here we can see how
Amsterdam compares to other cities in an easy-to-read spider diagram — it is clearly doing fairly well in reaching its
sustainability goals.
 I N D I C A T O R S F O R S U S T A I N A B L E C I T I E S
16

European Green Leaf Award

Inspired by the success of the Green Capital Award, the • Waste and Circular Economy;
European Commission launched the European Green • Water.
Leaf Award in 2015, which is a similar competition, but
for smaller cities, i.e. with populations of between 20,000 The Spanish city of Mollet del Vallès and the Portuguese
and 100,000 people. The European Green Leaf recognises city of Torres Vedras were the winners of the inaugural
the cities and towns which are most committed to green European Green Leaf Award 2015 and the Irish city of
growth and a better environment. Galway is European Green Leaf City 2017. The Belgian
city of Leuven and the Swedish city of Växjö are the joint
Applicant cities are ranked based on their performance in winners of the European Green Leaf Awards 2018.
these 6 topic areas:
• Climate Change and Energy Performance; For more information see: http://ec.europa.eu/
• Sustainable Urban Mobility; environment/europeangreencapital/europeangreenleaf/
• Nature, Biodiversity and Land Use;
• Air Quality and Noise;

Global City Indicators Facility

The Global City Indicators Facility (GCIF) has developed not measure pollution or air quality and there is little
and implemented a standardised global indicator set that mention of renewable energy sources. However, the tool
allows for performance evaluation on an international is well-established, and there are already hundreds of cities
scale (Global Cities Institute, 2007). See http://www. that are GCIF Members.
citiesalliance.org/node/2529.
A notable strength of the GCIF system is that it is easy to
The tool covers all aspects of urban life, with an emphasis implement.
on economic and social measures of sustainability. It does

Indicators for Sustainability

The result is a core indicator set that is flexible, easy
The Indicators for Sustainability report (Dekker et al., to implement and relevant to cities regardless of size
2012) from Sustainable Cities International took a or location (see facing page). The indicators cover a
different approach to the development of an indicator broad range of sustainability targets. Little weight is
set compared to the other frameworks mentioned so far. given to indicators of health and governance, however.

It began with case studies of several international cities The report itself (http://sustainablecities.net/)
of varying size. From this information they chose incorporates the indicator list into an easy-to-use
indicators that were common to several cities, easy Toolkit for Cities. This includes guidelines for
to understand and implement, and covered multiple evaluating the needs of a specific city and establishing
related sustainability goals. baseline targets, as well as best practices gleaned from
case studies.

Reference Framework for Sustainable Cities

The Reference Framework for Sustainable Cities The tool provides practical materials and instruments for
(RFSC) is a toolkit to help European cities implement cities for this purpose, but also functions as a checklist or
the sustainability goals of the Leipzig Charter on planning instrument for future sustainability initiatives.
Sustainable European Cities. It is a freely-accessible
and flexible way for cities to stimulate sustainable and The indicator set consists of 16 key indicators as well as
integrated urban development in line with Europe over 300 supplementary indicators, covering economy,
2020 guidelines and objectives (van Dijken, Dorenbos society, environment and governance. The tool places
& Kamphof, 2012). particular emphasis on sustainable governance and
economic activity.
I N D I C A T O R S F O R S U S T A I N A B L E C I T I E S
17

Due to the large number of supplementary indicators, the indicator set depending on the needs and aims of the
RFSC indicator set is extremely flexible. particular city.

Implementation is also straightforward: once a user The tool was tested out in more than 80 cities in nearly
has registered on the website (http://app.rfsc.eu/), they all EU Member States, ranging from very small to very
are guided through the process of generating a unique large. Feedback from that exercise was used to develop
the tool into a web-based portal.

Sector Indicator Measures

Economy Unemployment rates/ Jobs Underemployment/employment/

vunemployment rates; Percentage of green jobs
in the local economy; Average professional
education years of labour force
Economic growth Annual GDP growth rate; Annual GNP growth
rate; Net Export Growth rates (% increase
of country’s total exports minus the value of
its total imports per annum; Foreign Direct
Investments (Capital/Earnings accrued from
listed FDI’s per annum)
Environment Green spaces Percentage of preserved areas/ reservoirs/
waterways/parks in relation to total land area;
Percentage of trees in the city in relation to city
area and/or population size
Reduce greenhouse gases/ Energy efficiency Total amount of GHG emissions per city and
per capita; Percentage of total energy consumed
in the city that comes from renewable sources
Mobility Transportation mode split (Percentage of each
mode of transportation, i.e. private, public,
bicycles, pedestrians); Average commute time
and cost
Water quality/ Availability Total amount of water availability; Water
quality index/score; Proportion of population
with access to adequate and safe drinking water
Air quality Levels of Particulate Matter (PM10 – mg/m3);
Levels of Particulate Matter (PM2.5 – mg/m3)
Waste/ Reuse/ Recycle Recycling rate (Percentage diverted from waste
stream); Volume of solid waste generated
Social Complete neighbourhood/ Compact city Access to local/ neighbourhood services within
a short distance; Crime rates; Measures of
income distribution and inequality
Housing Percentage of social/ affordable/ priority
housing; Breakdown of housing sector by
property type (owner occupied/ rental, single
occupant/couples/family/multifamily etc.)
Quality public space Percentage of roadways in good condition;
Percentage of green space (public parks)
coverage in relation to city area and/or
population size
Education Number of schools with environmental
education programs; Adult literacy rate
Sanitation Percentage of population with access to water-
borne or alternative (and effective) sanitary
sewage infrastructure
Health Mortality rate/ Life expectancy; Percentage of
population with access to health care services

Table 3: Sustainable Cities International’s Indicators for Sustainability list

 I N D I C A T O R S F O R S U S T A I N A B L E C I T I E S
18

STAR Community Rating System

The Sustainability Tools for Assessing and Rating Human wellbeing and quality of life is highlighted, while
Communities (STAR) Community Rating System is a less focus is placed on waste management and transport
toolbox developed for community leaders in the USA to aspects.
assess the sustainability of their community, set targets for
the future, and measure progress along the way (Lynch et The tool is freely accessible at www.starcommunities.
al., 2011). org. It provides options for communities to conduct an
initial assessment, as well as the possibility to be rated and
The indicators were developed over time by a number certified based on the overall score achieved.
of technical advisory committees, and will continue to
be adjusted as necessary. The tool includes economic, No official case studies have been published, but the pilot
environmental and social aspects of sustainability, and programme was tested in 34 cities in the USA. Thirteen
consists of a number of goals, objectives, and evaluation of those have since achieved STAR Certification. Some
measures. examples of successful implementation can be found at
www.STARcommunities.org/communities.

Urban Audit Cities Statistics

The Urban Audit, run by Eurostat, is currently the addition, all data submitted to Eurostat undergoes a quality
largest urban data collection effort in the EU (Eurostat check before being included in the Urban Audit.
is the Directorate-General of the European Commission
responsible for collecting and distributing statistics for the Participation in the Urban Audit is voluntary, and cities
European Union, as well as harmonising data collection can join the audit by contacting Eurostat (http://ec.europa.
efforts across EU member states). The Urban Audit is eu/eurostat/web/cities). One important consideration is
comprised of hundreds of variables maintained in an Urban that although the Urban Audit variables are well-defined,
Audit database (Manninen et al., 2004). It is thus not in the database has not necessarily been well-populated by
itself an indicator system, but many of the variables could countries that have not been obligated to participate;
become indicators if they were integrated in a set dedicated in some cases, there is no data available for the cities of
to providing information on a specific issue. certain countries.

Since 1999, data has been collected every 3 years from Further information on each of the indicators is
hundreds of cities and urban zones. Cities included in the available in the Urban Audit Reference Guide (http://
Audit range in size from 50 000 to 10 million people. ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/3859598/5902753/
KS-RA-07-016-EN.PDF/23b5af3c-3348-4155-bab9-
The data set covers all aspects of city life in great detail, and, f79b89c44dd6?version=1.0).
as mentioned, it could be easily adjusted to suit the needs of
To access Urban Audit data, go to http://ec.europa.eu/
a specific city or urban centre simply by selecting a subset of eurostat/web/cities/data/database.
the available variables that could function as indicators. In

Urban Ecosystem Europe

The Urban Ecosystem Europe (UEE) Report is an The focus is on local governance and quality of life, but
assessment of 32 European cities by the research institute the indicators manage to touch on almost all aspects of
Ambiente Italia, and forms part of the International urban sustainability.
Council for Local Environmental Initiatives (ICLEI).
As part of the report, researchers developed set of The cities evaluated ranged in size from 150 000 people
indicators specific to the purpose. They took several other to more than 2 million, showing that the indicator set is
indicator systems into consideration when developing the scalable to both large and small cities. A main output of
methodology for the UEE project. the UEE report is a series of city profiles that show a city’s
standing terms of sustainable development.
The indicators were chosen to reflect a city’s progress
towards the Aarlborg Commitments for sustainable cities.

This is a representative graph (facing page) showing the type of output produced by the Urban Ecosystem Europe
Report, 2007. The graph compares annual particulate matter (PM10) concentrations (a common indicator of air quality)
for 30 large, medium and small European cities. The report also discusses each indicator result in some depth.
I N D I C A T O R S F O R S U S T A I N A B L E C I T I E S
19

Figure 6: Urban Ecosystem Europe.

Urban Sustainability Indicators

The Urban Sustainability Indicator framework was developed by the European Foundation for the Improvement of
Living and Working Conditions from the commitments laid out in the Charter of European Sustainable Cities and
Towns, also known as the Aarlborg Commitments (Mega & Pedersen, 1998).

Indicators were assigned to each policy theme identified in the charter, ensuring a brief but highly significant indicator
set. The selected indicators effectively cover all aspects of urban sustainability, with a special focus on measures of
environmental health. The set was tested on a number of European cities.

Notably, the system includes a ‘Unique Sustainability’ category, which endeavours to quantify certain sustainable
practices or features that are unique to a specific city.

Implementing this indicator system can be achieved using the report (available at https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/
sites/default/files/ef_files/pubdocs/1998/07/en/1/ef9807en.pdf ), which offers detailed accounts of how to apply and
measure each aspect, as well as more general guidelines for city managers.

Indicator Data components/measure

Global climate Emitted total CO2, CH4, N2O and CFCs and halons
Air quality Number of days per year on which alarm levels are exceeded and traffic
circulation is stopped
Acidification Deposition of SO2, NO2 and NH3 per hectare
Ecosystem toxification Sum of emitted quantities of cadmium, polyaromatic hydrocarbons, mercury,
dioxin, epoxyethane, fluorides and copper, and radioactive substances, weighted
according to their toxicity and their residence time in the environment
Urban mobility/clean transport Total number of trips (and their length) by private car and number of trips, (and
their length) for commuting and basic needs/inhabitant/year
Waste management Tonnes of waste disposed of per inhabitant and per year (building and
demolition waste, industrial waste, domestic waste, retail and service waste)
 I N D I C A T O R S F O R S U S T A I N A B L E C I T I E S
20

Indicator Data components/measure

Energy consumption Tonnes of oil equivalent per inhabitant per year for domestic use, industrial use,
the tertiary sector and public spaces
Water consumption Metres3 per inhabitant per year (total water extracted minus water from recycling
and water used for maintenance of public and green spaces)
Nuisance Percentage of the population affected by noise, odour or visual pollution
Social justice Percentage of the population affected by poverty, unemployment, lack of access
to education, information, training and leisure
Housing quality Percentage of the population affected by lack of housing or poor housing
environments
Urban safety Total percentage of the population affected seriously by crime or traffic accidents

Economic urban sustainability Total individual incomes in city minus: city fiscal deficit, environmental
expenditure and pollution damage per inhabitant per year
Green, public space and heritage Percentage of green or public spaces and local heritage in need of improvement
Citizen participation Total percentage of the population participating in local elections or as active
members in associations for urban improvement and quality of life
Unique sustainability To be defined by cities — this indicator should represent the degree to which
unique factors or events lead to urban sustainability with its environmental,
social and economic dimensions
Table 4: The European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions’ Urban Sustainability
Indicators

4. Other potentially useful tools

Here follows a list of tools that may not be as scalable and easy to implement as those mentioned in the previous chapter,
nor as comprehensive, but are worth looking into for any city looking at developing indicator tools or taking part in
established programmes.

Indicator/Toolkit: Organisation: Read More:

BREEAM Communities Building Research https://www.breeam.com/

Establishment Environmental
Assessment Methodology
(BREEAM)
Climate+ Development Clinton Foundation; US Green http://www.c40.org/other/climate-positive-
Program Building Council development-program
Covenant of Mayors Covenant of Mayors http://www.covenantofmayors.eu/
DGNB Certification German Sustainable Building http://www.dgnb.de/en/
System Council
Eco2 Cities Initiative World Bank http://siteresources.worldbank.org/
INTURBANDEVELOPMENT/
Resources/336387-1270074782769/
Eco2CitiesBookWeb.pdf
Eurostat Sustainable Eurostat http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/sdi/sustainable-
Development Indicators cities-and-communities
Green Cities Programme OECD http://www.oecd.org/regional/greening-cities-
regions/46811501.pdf
I N D I C A T O R S F O R S U S T A I N A B L E C I T I E S
21

Indicator/Toolkit: Organisation Read More:

Green Star Green Building Council of http://www.gbca.org.au/green-star/
Australia
LEED for Neighbourhood Leadership in Energy and https://www.nrdc.org/cities/smartgrowth/files/
Development (LEED-ND) Environmental Design (LEED) citizens_guide_LEED-ND.pdf
National Australian Built Government of Australia https://www.nabers.gov.au/public/WebPages/
Environment Rating Home.aspx
System (NABERS)
SDEWES Index International Centre for http://www.piran2016.sdewes.org/sdewes_index.
Sustainable Development of php
Energy, Water and Environment
Systems (SDEWES) Index
SynCity Imperial College London https://workspace.imperial.ac.uk/
urbanenergysystems/public/urs_keirstead2009.pdf

Urban Indicators UN Human Settlements https://unhabitat.org/urban-indicators-guidelines-

Guidelines Programme monitoring-the-habitat-agenda-and-the-
millennium-development-goals/

Table 5: A list of other applicable tools.

BREEAM Communities
Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Methodology (BREEAM) Communities is the most
widely-used international tool for evaluating the sustainability of large developments and communities (Joss, 2012). It
promotes developments that are good for the environment, pleasant to live in and economically feasible. To read more,
go to https://www.breeam.com/.

Climate + Development Programme

The Climate Positive Development Programme is a framework to promote practices contributing to sustainable
development in the USA (Clinton Foundation, 2011). The programme rewards a range of behaviours and activities that
reduce emissions and promote carbon-positive buildings and communities. Read more about the Climate+ Development
Programme here: http://climatepositivedevelopment.org/download/attachments/294975/ClimatePositiveFramework
+v1.0+2011+.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1331574106709.

Covenant of Mayors
The Covenant of Mayors for Climate & Energy brings together thousands of local and regional authorities voluntarily
committed to implementing EU climate and energy objectives on their territory. This movement started in 2008 (with the
support of the European Commission), in which signatory local authorities share a vision for making cities decarbonised
and resilient, and for citizens to have access to secure, sustainable and affordable energy. The Covenant of Mayors offers
a facilitated self-assessment and peer-to-peer exchange through a common monitoring and reporting template, a flexible
reference framework for action, which is adaptable to local needs as well as enhanced cooperation. More information can
be found here: http://www.covenantofmayors.eu/.

DGNB Certification System

The German Sustainable Building Council (DGNB) is a registered non-profit organisation and its certification system
provides an assessment of the sustainability of buildings and urban districts, using up to 50 sustainability criteria.
Buildings are assessed over their entire life cycle. The certification system can be tailored to different possible uses of a
building as well as to country-specific requirements. It can be applied internationally. The DGNB certificates exist in
bronze, silver, gold and platinum and there is even the possibility of a pre-certification during the planning phase. More
information can be found here: http://www.dgnb.de/en/.
 I N D I C A T O R S F O R S U S T A I N A B L E C I T I E S
22

The Eco2 Cities Initiative

The Eco2 Cities Initiative is a World Bank Programme that has developed a framework for analysing economic and ecological
sustainability of developing cities around the world (Moffatt, Suzuki & Iizuka, 2012). It uses the Global City Indicators
Facility indicator set (mentioned earlier in this report) for initial analysis and provides advice and a decision-support
system for developing cities. All of this information can be found in the book Eco2 Cities: Ecological Cities as Economical
Cities (http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTURBANDEVELOPMENT/Resources/336387-1270074782769/
Eco2CitiesBookWeb.pdf ).

Eurostat Sustainable Development Indicators

This EU indicator set is used by Eurostat for biennial monitoring of the EU Sustainable Development Strategy on an EU
and national level. These indicators are intended to give an overall picture of whether the European Union has achieved
progress towards sustainable development in terms of the objectives and targets defined in the strategy. They are presented
in ten themes; more information can be found at: http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/2995521/5168890/8-
12122013-CP-EN.PDF/be0127a8-69c5-414d-b1ba-e9d025fa54c1.

Green Cities Programme (OECD)

This is a promising international project that has developed its own set of indicators for evaluation of policies in cities
and urban areas. However, the project is still in progress and the indicator sets are not publically available. Further
information can be found here: http://www.oecd.org/gov/regional-policy/49318965.pdf.

Green Star
Green Star is primarily a tool for rating energy efficiency of existing buildings. It was first developed in Australia, but is
also recognised in several other countries, including New Zealand and South Africa (Joss, 2012). For more information,
visit http://www.gbca.org.au/green-star/. A comparison of the energy performance assessment between the LEED,
BREEAM and Green Star programmes has been done by Roderick et al. (2009).

LEED for Neighbourhood Development

Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design for Neighbourhood Development (LEED-ND) is a sustainability
certification for neighbourhoods and small communities (Welch, Benfield & Raimi, 2010). It builds on the LEED
sustainability certification for buildings (founded in the USA), and aims to reduce vehicle travel, create local jobs
and services, and promote green building and infrastructure. For more information, see https://www.nrdc.org/cities/
smartgrowth/files/citizens_guide_LEED-ND.pdf.

NABERS
The National Australian Built Environment Rating System (NABERS) is a tool created by the Australian government to
evaluate the environmental performance of various types of building (such as houses, office blocks or shopping centres).
Greenhouse gas emissions, energy efficiency, water efficiency, waste efficiency and indoor environment quality are all
taken into account (Joss, 2012). For more information, go to http://www.nabers.gov.au/public/WebPages/Home.aspx.

SDEWES Index
This index has been developed to evaluate cities’ performances and to allow a comparison of best practices. Cities are
benchmarked according to 7 dimensions, 35 indicators and close to 20 sub-indicators. Based on the wide scope of the
index, the final ranking favours those cities that have above -average performances in as many dimensions as possible.
The 7 dimensions are Energy Consumption and Climate; Penetration of Energy and CO2 Saving Measures; Renewable
Energy Potential and Utilisation; Water and Environmental Quality; CO2 Emissions and Industrial Profile;,City
Planning and Social Welfare; R&D; and Innovation and Sustainability Policy. More information can be found here:
http://www.piran2016.sdewes.org/sdewes_index.php.
I N D I C A T O R S F O R S U S T A I N A B L E C I T I E S
23

SynCity
SynCity is a generalised modelling tool for integrated urban energy management, with a focus on sustainability (Keirstead,
Samsatli & Shah, 2009). It uses an indicator set as data input for a software model that can be used in the planning stages
of an urban development. The tool is described here: https://workspace.imperial.ac.uk/urbanenergysystems/public/urs_
keirstead2009.pdf.
Urban Indicators Guidelines
The Urban Indicator Guidelines (United Nations Human Settlements Programme, 2004) set developed by the United
Nations Human Settlements Programme focuses on quality of life, with little attention paid to sustainability goals. These
indicators were developed to monitor global progress towards the Millennium Development Goals and the Habitat
Agenda. An introduction to the Urban Indicator Guidelines can be found on the UN Habitat website: https://unhabitat.
org/urban-indicators-guidelines-monitoring-the-habitat-agenda-and-the-millennium-development-goals/.

5. Summary
Sustainability indicators are a proven
method for driving sustainable urban
development, and hundreds of different
sets and frameworks exist. As cities vary
greatly in terms of available resources, population size and urban metabolic processes, this wealth of tools is useful.
However, choosing appropriate sustainability indicators can be difficult. The advantages, disadvantages and applicability
of some of the more successful indicator tools that have been established and validated all over the world have been
presented in this report to help simplify the selection process for city planning authorities.

The research reviewed in the preceding chapters shows that efficient governance informed by science-driven policies is a
critical component of sustainable development. As progress-measurement tools or static sustainability diagnostics, urban
sustainability indicators provide the simple, measurable evidence needed to create and maintain cities that are not just
environmentally-friendly, but that promote long-term economic productivity, as well as the health and well-being of
their citizens. 

6. References
Adams, W. M. (2006) The Future of Sustainability: Re-thinking Cash, D.W., Clark, W.C., Alcock, F., Dickson, N.M., Eckley, N.,
Environment and Development in the Twenty-first Century. Report of Guston, D.H., Jäger, J. & Mitchell, R.B. (2003) Knowledge systems for
the IUCN Renowned Thinkers Meeting, 29-31 January 2006. IUCN. sustainable development. [online]. Proceedings of the National Academy
of Sciences of the United States of America. 100 (14), pp. 8086–8091.
Adelle, C. & Pallemaerts, M. (2009) Sustainable Development
Indicators. doi:10.1787/9789264016958-10-en. Chrysoulakis, N., de Castro, E.A. & Moors, E.J. (2014) Understanding
Urban Metabolism: A Tool for Urban Planning.
Adinyira, E., Oteng-seifah, S. & Adjei-kumi, T. (2007) A Review of
Urban Sustainability Assessment Methodologies. In: International Clinton Foundation (2011) Climate+ Development Program:
Conference on Whole Life Urban Sustainability and its Assessment. Framework for Climate Positive Communities. [online]. Available from:
2007 Glasgow: . http://climatepositivedevelopment.org/.
Agu, G. (2007) The DPSIR framework used by the EEA. Available Cooper, P. 2012. The DPSWR Social-Ecological Accounting Framework:
from: http://ia2dec.ew.eea.europa.eu/knowledge_base/Frameworks/ Notes on its Definition and Application. Policy Brief No. 3. EU FP7
doc101182 [Accessed 14 October 2014]. KNOWSEAS Project. ISBN 0-9529089-5-6.
Berrini, M. & Bono, L. (2011) Measuring Urban Sustainability: Analysis Dekker, S., Jacob, J., Klassen, E., Miller, H., Thielen, S. & Their, W.W.
of the European Green Capital Award. p.pp. 1–44. (2012) Indicators for Sustainability.
Berrini, M. & Bono, L. (2007) Urban Ecosystem Europe. [online] Van Dijken, K., Dorenbos, R. & Kamphof, R. (2012) The Reference
Framework for Sustainable Cities (RFSC): Testing results and
Camagni, R. (2002) On the concept of territorial competitiveness :
recommendations. (January).
sound or misleading ? In: ESRA Conference. 2002 Dortmund: .
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2002)
Campbell, S. (1996) Green Cities , Growing Cities , Just Cities ? Urban
Pressure-State-Response Framework and Environmental Indicators.
Planning and the Contradictions of Sustainable Development. Journal
Available from: http://www.fao.org/ag/againfo/programmes/en/lead/
of the American Planning Association. pp. 1–30.
toolbox/refer/envindi.htm [Accessed 15 October 2014].
 I N D I C A T O R S F O R S U S T A I N A B L E C I T I E S

KH-BC-18-001-EN-N
20

Gabrielsen, P. & Bosch, P. (2003) Environmental indicators: typology Moffatt, S., Suzuki, H. & Iizuka, R. (2012) Eco2 Cities Guide.
and use in reporting. EEA, Copenhagen. Ecological Cities as Economic Cities.
Gari, S. R., Newton, A. & Icely, J. D. (2015) A review of the application Moreno Pires, S., Fidélis, T. & Ramos, T.B. (2014) Measuring and
and evolution of the DPSIR framework with an emphasis on coastal comparing local sustainable development through common indicators:
social-ecological systems. Ocean & Coastal Management 103: 63-77. Constraints and achievements in practice [online]. Cities. 39pp. 1–9.
[Accessed 10 June 2014].
Global Cities Institute (2007) List of Indicators: Global City Indicators
Facility [online]. Niemeijer, D. & de Groot, R.S. (2008) Framing environmental
indicators: moving from causal chains to causal networks. Environment,
Grimm, N.B., Faeth, S.H., Golubiewski, N.E., Redman, C.L., Wu, J.,
Development and Sustainability. 10 (1), pp. 89–106.
Bai, X. & Briggs, J.M. (2008) Global change and the ecology of cities.
[online]. Science (New York, N.Y.). 319 (5864), pp. 756–760. Ramos, T.B., Caeiro, S. & de Melo, J.J. (2004) Environmental indicator
frameworks to design and assess environmental monitoring programs
Hammond, A., Adriaanse, A., Rodenburg, E., Bryant, D. & Woodward,
[online]. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal. 22 (1), pp. 47–62.
R. (1995) Environmental Indicators: A Systematic Approach to
[Accessed 21 September 2014].
Measuring and Reporting on Environmental Policy Performance in the
Context of Sustainable Development. Roderick, Y., McEwan, D., Wheatley, C. & Alonso, C. (2009)
Comparison of energy performance assessment between LEED,
Hiremath, R.B., Balachandra, P., Kumar, B., Bansode, S.S. & Murali, J.
BREEAM and Green Star. In: Eleventh International IBPSA Conference,
(2013) Indicator-based urban sustainability—A review [online]. Energy
Glasgow, Scotland, 27-30 July 2009. 2009 pp. pp. 1167–1176.
for Sustainable Development. 17 (6), pp. 555–563. [Accessed 23 May
2014]. Sébastien, L. & Bauler, T. (2013) Use and influence of composite
indicators for sustainable development at the EU-level [online].
Joss, S. (ed. . (2012) Tommorow’s City Today: Eco-city Indicators,
Ecological Indicators. 35pp. 3–12. [Accessed 3 October 2014].
Standards & Frameworks. Bellagio Conference Report. In: Simon Joss
(ed.). Bellagio Conference. 2012 London: University of Westminster. Shen, L.-Y., Jorge Ochoa, J., Shah, M.N. & Zhang, X. (2011) The
p. pp. 21. application of urban sustainability indicators – A comparison between
various practices [online]. Habitat International. 35 (1), pp. 17–29.
Keirstead, J. (2007) Selecting sustainability indicators for urban energy
[Accessed 26 May 2014].
systems. International Conference on Whole Life Urban Sustainability
and its Assessment. Tarzia, V. (ed. . (2003) European Common Indicators Towards a Local
Sustainability Profile.
Keirstead, J., Samsatli, N. & Shah, N. (2009) SynCity: An Integrated
Tool Kit For Urban Energy Systems Modelling. In: Fifth Urban Research Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2003)
Syposium. 2009 London: Imperial College London. OECD Environmental Indicators: Development, Measurement and
Use.
Kennedy, C., Cuddihy, J. & Engel-Yan, J. (2007) The changing
metabolism of cities [online]. Journal of Industrial Ecology. 11 (2), pp. United Nations Human Settlements Programme (2004) Urban
43–59. [Accessed 5 October 2014]. Indicators Guidelines.
Kötter, T. & Friesecke, F. (2011) Developing urban indicators for Watson, J. (ed. . (2009) European Green City Index.
managing mega cities. Department of Urban Planning and Real Estate
WCED (1987) Our Common Future: Report of the World Commission
Management, Institute of Geodesy and Geoinformation, University of
on Environment and Development Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Bonn.
(1987), pp. 1–300, especially point, particularly chapter 2, III, 7.73
Van Leeuwen, C.J., Frijns, J., van Wezel, A. & van de Ven, F.H.M. online via http://www.un-documents.net/wced-ocf.htm
(2012) City Blueprints: 24 Indicators to Assess the Sustainability of the
Welch, A., Benfield, K. & Raimi, M. (2010) A Citizen ’s Guide to LEED
Urban Water Cycle [online]. Water Resources Management. 26 (8), pp.
for Neighborhood Development : How to Tell if Development is Smart
2177–2197. [Accessed 29 May 2014].
and Green.
Li, X., Li, X., Woetzel, J., Zhang, G. & Zhang, Y. (2014) The China
Zavadskas, E., Kaklauskas, A., Šaparauskas, J. & Kalibatas, D. (2007)
Urban Sustainability Index 2013. (April).
Vilnius urban sustainability assessment with an emphasis on pollution.
Lynch, A.J., Andreason, S., Eisenman, T., Robinson, J., Steif, K. & Ekologija. 53pp. 64–72
Birch, E.L. (2011) Sustainable Urban Development Indicators for the
United States.
Manninen, A., Pumain, D., Lehtonen, R., Trutzel, K. & Croi, Wi.
(2004) Urban Audit Methodological Handbook. [online].
Mega, V. & Pedersen, J. (1998) Urban Sustainability Indicators Keep up-to-date
Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European
Communities. Subscribe to Science for Environment Policy’s weekly News
Alert by emailing:
Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) Ecosystems and Human sfep@uwe.ac.uk
Well-being: Synthesis.
Minx, J., Creutzig, F., Ziegler, T. & Owen, A. (2010) Developing a Or sign up online at:
pragmatic approach to assess urban metabolism in Europe. 240 (1) p.pp. http://ec.europa.eu/science-environment-policy
1–83.