Sarita - MFS - Service Quality Managementn - Chapter
Sarita - MFS - Service Quality Managementn - Chapter
Sarita - MFS - Service Quality Managementn - Chapter
Objective
Structure
1. Introduction
2. Service Quality and Customer Satisfaction
3. Service Quality in Banking
4. Gaps Model of Service Quality
5. Customer Rights
1. Introduction
1
NIBM, Pune
Service quality
and other Customer
Customer Company
controllable retention
satisfaction profitability
marketing and loyalty
variables
Thus ensuring that customer service is designed and deployed by bank is of prime
importance for growing bank’s business as well as developing a differentiated brand
image.
i. Service quality
2
NIBM, Pune
Service Quality is defined as the extent to which a service meets customers’ requirements.
It is the delivery of excellent or superior service relative to customer expectations.
The following model identifies the elements that determine the quality of service.
The model suggests that both functional quality and technical quality are needed for
forming customer’s perception and expectation of service. Functional quality is the way
in which the service is delivered. It refers to service attributes like helpfulness,
friendliness, politeness, etc. Technical quality refers to the evaluation of service outcome
that is the extent to which the service encounters results in desired outcomes like
correctness and accuracy of transaction. To deliver quality service, good technical skills
as well as interpersonal skills are required. Research indicates that functional quality
may be more important than technical quality in financial services.
Customer Satisfaction is the post purchase evaluation of service taking into consideration
the expectations. It is the positive and pleasurable experience in service encounter.
Customer satisfaction depends on two factors viz., customer expectations and bank
product/service performance termed as customer perception. Customer expectation is
determined by customer’s past experience with product /service/provider, customers
own needs and special conditions, and by word of mouth from other users as well as
communication from service provider. Customer perception is what customer
3
NIBM, Pune
experiences when he consumes the service, which depends upon product features,
service features, processes, policies, etc.
The discrepancy between customer expectations and customer experience with service
is termed as ‘disconfirmation’. When experience exceeds expectations then customer is
satisfied, when the service far exceeds beyond expectation, there is delight, conversely,
when service falls short of expectation, there is dissatisfaction.
Zeithaml and Berry in their work have identified dimensions and determinants of service
quality in banking. These are –
(a) Reliability – Reliability is the degree to which bank delivers the promised services to
customers. Reliability as expected by customers can be in form of ‘performance as
per promise’, disbursements on time stipulated, and maintenance of error free and
accurate records of financial transactions.
(b) Responsiveness – This dimension refers to the bank’s promptness and keenness in
attending customer needs. Responsiveness is manifested in providing fast services,
quickness in problem resolution, prompt actions, and timely decisions.
(d) Empathy – Empathy stands for bank’s ability to give individualised attention to
customer needs and understanding of his unique situations. It is essential that
customer service employees exhibit a personal connection and care in dealing with
customers, especially when they are in need of help or facing distress.
(e) Tangibles – Tangibles are the physical characteristics of service experience. These are
branch location, décor, facilities, equipment, etc. These are also reflected in neatness
and quality of bank stationary, cheque books, as well as also the website’s user
friendliness. Similarly, appearance and grooming of officials , quality of published
material related to bank’s products and services etc. develop a service perception in
borrower’s mind.
All these 5 dimensions together form an assessment of customer satisfaction level. Banks
should determine customer satisfaction on all these dimensions by conducting customer
research. One of the most common research approaches is the use of SERVQUAL Survey.
4
NIBM, Pune
5
NIBM, Pune
6
NIBM, Pune
The model postulates that the gap between customers expected service and perceived
service called Provider Gap (Gap 5), is related to four other gaps in the service delivery
process. Provider Gap can be attributed to any four Gaps viz., Listening Gap (Gap 1),
Service Design and Standards Gap (Gap 2), Service Performance Gap (Gap 3) and
Communication Gap (Gap 4).
Listening Gap (Gap 1) occurs when customers’ actual expectations from service are not
understood by senior management. Lack of market research and poor upward
communication may be the major reasons for this gap. Poor service recovery and absence
of customer relationship focus are also responsible for this gap. Frontline employees
have regular contact with customers, and have a good understanding of their needs and
expectations. To effectively address this gap, efforts to understand customers should be
made by conducting market research, encouraging upward communication from
frontline to senior management and developing relationship orientation with customers.
Service design and Standards Gap (Gap 2). This gap arises when organization designed
service standards, features and specifics are not matching with what customers expect.
Difficulty in standardizing services, managers’ judgement of customer expectations to be
unreasonable and lack of commitment towards service quality may be the reasons. This
leads to less intent and effort towards developing customer centred design standards.
Addressing this gap involves, getting top management commitment towards service
quality, ensuring that customer service expectations are considered in design. Customer
priorities and key service features should be identified and need to be the basis of service
design specifics. Those aspects of service which can be standardized, should be
standardized.
Service Performance Gap (Gap 3) - Even when customer driven service design and
standards are developed and deployed, it may happen that service delivery is not
according to these. Such discrepancies are termed as Service Performance Gap. Three
main reasons for this gap are inadequate human resource management, customer not
understanding his role vis-à-vis service and a failure to manage supply and demand.
Employees who are less motivated, committed or trained, deliver sub-optimum service.
Customers may not understand their own role in completion of service, or due to over
demand, service standards are compromised. To deal with this gap, human resource
policies need to be revamped towards ensuring recruitment of right people with
knowledge and skills, having monitoring mechanism to see that employees follow
specified service standards. Employees also need to be rewarded for good service, there
should be good fit among technology and people supposed to operate it. Customers also
need to be educated about information they need to provide so that service is provided
as desired. To manage supply and demand mismatch, cooperation, team work and
resource management should be ensured.
Communication Gap (Gap 4) – This gap arises when external communication by bank
promises a higher standard of service than what it actually delivers. Thus, the
expectations so raised, when not fulfilled create discontent and dissatisfaction. Poor
7
NIBM, Pune
Thus, service quality can be managed and enhanced with the help of analysis guided by
Gaps Model and developing action plans to reduce the provider gap.
5. Customer Rights
The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has formulated a "Charter of Customer Rights" for banks
based on global best practices in the area of consumer protection. The Charter enshrines
broad, overarching principles for protection of bank customers and enunciates the
following five basic rights of bank customers:
(i) Right to Fair Treatment: Both the customer and the financial services
provider have a right to be treated with courtesy. The customer should not be
unfairly discriminated against on grounds such as gender, age, religion, caste and
physical ability when offering and delivering financial products.
(ii) Right to Transparency, Fair and Honest Dealing: The financial services
provider should make every effort to ensure that the contracts or agreements it
frames are transparent, easily understood by and well communicated to, the
common person. The product’s price, the associated risks, the terms and
conditions that govern use over the product’s life cycle and the responsibilities of
the customer and financial service provider, should be clearly disclosed. The
customer should not be subject to unfair business or marketing practices, coercive
contractual terms or misleading representations. Over the course of their
relationship, the financial services provider cannot threaten the customer with
physical harm, exert undue influence, or engage in blatant harassment
(iii) Right to Suitability: The products offered should be appropriate to the needs
of the customer and based on an assessment of the customer’s financial
circumstances and understanding.
8
NIBM, Pune
business purposes. Customers have the right to protection from all kinds of
communications, electronic or otherwise, which infringe upon their privacy
(v) Right to Grievances Redress and Compensation: The customer has a right
to hold the financial services provider accountable for the products offered and to
have a clear and easy way to have any valid grievances redressed. The provider
should also facilitate the redress of grievances stemming from its sale of third
party products. The financial services provider must communicate its policy for
compensating mistakes, lapses in conduct, as well as non-performance or delays
in performance, whether caused by the provider or otherwise. The policy must lay
out the rights and duties of the customer when such events occur.