Financial Analysis - Assignment 1
Financial Analysis - Assignment 1
of
Hindustan Unilever Limited
P&G Hygiene and Health
Dabur India Limited
INTRODUCTION
Major News
2021:
To ensure consumers have access to their favourite ice creams, HUL Partnered with Zomato and Swiggy.
Completed the acquisition of hygiene brand VWash.
HUL has provided Covid-19 medical insurance for all those who work at the front end across its supply chain
and sales.
HUL eB2B app, Shikhar enabled its retail partners to place contact less orders conveniently. It has 5 lakh retailers
order through Shikhar. HUL has 1,36,000 Shakti Entrepreneurs.
Total Dividend payout of Rs.9,500 crores during the year.
In April 2020, Successfully completed the integration of the GlaxoSmithKline Consumer Healthcare Limited
(GSK CH) business into HUL. The merger, one of biggest in the India FMCG space
2019:
HUL delivered over Rs. 8,500 crores of EBITDA, EBITDA margins are at its highest ever at 22.9% and Profit
crossed Rs. 6,000 crores mark for the first time.
Acquired Adityaa Milk to expand ice creams business.
2018:
Lakme brand crossed the Rs. 1000 crores mark.
Industry Outlook
FMCG sector is the 4 th largest sector in the India economy boosting India’s GDP. The urban consumption of
FMCG products is increasing at a faster rate. Recent years have seen the growing demand from the rural and
semi-urban areas of India. The market size of the concerned sector in 2011 was US$ 31.6 billion, in 2015 it was
US$ 43.1 billion and it is estimated to reach US$ 103.7 billion in 2020. But, in the financial year (FY) 2019, the
market has been moving very sluggish due to certain reasons.
But after the introduction of GST, there has been a fall in the revenue collected from the rural areas in the FMCG
sector. This decade has also witnessed steep competition between various new players. But the giant share of the
industry is dominated by the most reputed names like Dabur (60%), Colgate (54.7%) and Hindustan Unilever
(54%). With the break of this decade in 2010, the country has experienced some major changes like Digital
Revolution, Technological Revolution and Economic Revolution. The increasing health and nutrition awareness,
beauty consciousness and higher expendable income of the contemporary Indian user base are leading to the
development and booming of several FMCG sub-sectors like air and water purifier, organic food staples and
supplements etc.
The government of India has allowed 100% Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) in single-brand retail and food
processing and 51% in multi-brand retail. This would boost employment and supply chain, increase the visibility
of FMCG retail brands and encourage more product launches. According to a report in 2015 by India Brand
Equity Foundation (IBEF), personal care and makeup contribute to 47% of the total revenue in this sector. By
the end of the decade, several brands are investing in this sector with new product launches in various parts of
the country.
In May 2018, Sanjeev Goenka Group invested US$ 14.92 million in a start-up in the FMCG sector. The closing
of the decade has seen brands like ITC, Sunfeast, Future Group investing in this sector. The government has
prepared Consumer Protection Bill for ensuring speedy, cost-effective and efficient business in the FMCG sector.
Thus securing the needs of the consumers. Though GST has enabled the products of FMCG sector to come under
a single tax bracket, still the growth has been affected.
The pattern of modern retail has elevated the brand consciousness in the minds of the consumers. The
unstructured and unorganized FMCG sector has a long way to go to match the pace with other active sectors like
insurance and automotive. The various sub-sectors thrive across the diverse economic sectors like urban, semi-
urban and rural. The demand for personal care, health care, feminine hygiene, monthly packs of commodities
and household items is much higher in urban and semi-urban areas. The demand for fabric care, hot beverages
and tobacco is higher in rural areas. Growing smartphone penetration and internet interconnectivity, expansion
of eCommerce retail sector is directly responsible for formalising the FMCG sector in India.
Few Peer companies in the same industry segment are:
ITC, Nestle, Britannia, Dabur, Godrej Group, Colgate-Palmolive, P & G Hygiene
HUL P&G
HUL 100% 100.00%
100.00%
80% 80.00%
80.00%
60% 60.00%
60.00%
40% 40.00%
40.00%
20.00% 20% 20.00%
0.00% 0% 0.00%
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
Equity Non-Current Liabilities Current Liabilities Non-current Assets Current Assets Non-current Assets Current Assets
Non-current Assets Current Assets Equity Non-Current Liabilities Current Liabilities Equity Non-Current Liabilities Current Liabilities
On the analysis of the above charts shows that the Non-current assets of HUL has increased from 40% in 2020 to 80% in 2021 due to the Goodwill and Intangible
additions on account of the integration of GlaxoSmithKline Consumer Healthcare Limited in to HUL. The Equity portion of the HUL has increased from 40% in
2020 to 70% in 2021 due to the issue of shares on account of acquisition of GSK CH during the year and internal accruals.
In case of P&G, the Non-current portion of assets has decreased from 40% in 2017 to 30% in 2021 and the company has to think of investing in its PPE also. In
the recent times the current liabilities portion is also increasing due to rise in Trade payables. The Equity portion of the company has decreased to a great extent in
year 2021 due to distribution of Rs. 1103 crore as dividend pay-out.
In case of Dabur, the Non-current assets portion of has increased in 2021 due to investment in Govt. Bonds by the Company. The Equity portion constitutes around
75% of the total liabilities which indicates that the company is accruing all its internal earnings without much distribution to its investors. The Company has to plan
for new investments or new line of business or product as it has much of idle funds in investments other than subsidiaries.
HUL has seen steady growth in Revenue from operations and Profit compared to its peer companies P&G and Dabur. HUL has seen an increase in Profit from
12.8%(2017) to 17.1%(2021) post implementation of GST. The Company is successful in handling increase in cost of material consumed at par with the increase
in revenue and there by the company is successful in improving its profit percentage
Expenses Tax Expenses Profit Expenses Tax Expenses Profit Expenses Tax Expenses Profit
The Revenue from Sales of P&G has increased from 97% in 2017 to 99% in 2021 but the Cost of material consumed has decreased from 41% in 2017 to 32% in
2021 but the current tax percentage has decreased from 10% in 2017 to 6% in 2021 due to adoption of new corporate tax rate of 25.16% in year 2021 from 24.608%
in 2017.
Dabur has maintained all the rise in the expenditures in line with the increase in sales there by it recorded a steady profit percent from Year 2017 to Year 2021.
PROFITABILITY RATIOS
1. There is a steady growth in the profit margins of HUL from the year 2018 to 2021 but there is significant growth in all the ratios of the HUL between 2017
and 2018 due to reduction of excise duty from Rs.2597cr to Rs. 693cr on introduction of GST on July 01, 2017.
2. HUL is performing better when compared to its peers P&G, Dabur in respect of all ratios. its return on Equity, Investments are higher than P&G, Dabur but
return on Fixed assets is lesser when compared to P&G but seems good when compared to Dabur.
3. Return on Equity has reduced from 84% in 2020 to 17% in 2021 due to issue of new share capital due to new business combination.
4. Return on investments, fixed assets has decreased due to the new addition in assets on account of business combinations.
5. The EPS of P&G is higher due to the less no. of issued shares compared to HUL and Dabur India.
Note:
Net profit margin is calculated by using total Revenue and Gross Profit margin and operating profit margin is calculated using revenue from operations
100%
Hindustan Unilever Limited 80%
Dabur India Ltd.
100% 60%
80% 40%
60% 20%
40% 0%
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
20%
0%
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Gross Profit Margin Operating Profit Margin
Gross Profit Margin Operating Profit Margin Net Profit Margin Net Profit Margin Return on Equity
Return on Equity Return on Investment Return on Investment
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
Cash Conversion Cycle Operating cycle- Trade payables It is an important metric for a business to determine the efficiency at which a company is
able to convert its inventory into sales and then into cash.
Hindustan Unilever Ltd. P&G Hygiene & Health Dabur India Ltd.
liquidity Ratios 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
Gross working capital 13640 11908 11374 11139 9411 1117 1328 1091 836 603 2830 3265 2124 1959 1784
Net working capital 2799 2804 3021 2503 2209 282 733 433 265 -27 794 1823 606 724 577
Cash Flow From Operating
Activities. 8957 7305 5728 5913 4953 863 474 412 415 445 1704 1155 1124 816 927
Current Ratio 1.3 1.3 1.4 1.3 1.3 1.3 2.2 1.7 1.5 1.0 1.4 2.3 1.4 1.6 1.5
Quick Ratio 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.9 1.3 1.2 0.7 0.8 1.7 0.9 1.0 1.0
Cash and Cash Equivalents to
Current Liabilities 0.2 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.8 1.5 0.8 0.7 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0
Cash Conversion Efficiency Ratio 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2
Average collection period (360
days) 13 10 16 12 10 14 20 22 22 20 14 22 25 21 22
Average payment period (360 days) 143 150 142 156 138 234 173 160 154 143 144 115 110 119 114
Inventories Conversion Period (360
days) 56 53 49 50 47 77 67 59 47 63 108 90 81 87 75
Operating Cycle 69 63 64 62 56 92 87 81 69 83 123 111 106 108 98
Cash Conversion Cycle -74 -87 -77 -94 -82 -142 -86 -78 -85 -60 -22 -3 -5 -12 -16
1. The Gross Working Capital of HUL is very healthy when compared to P & G, Dabur. There is a continuous improvement in the Gross working capital of
the Company.
2. The Net working capital has increased when compared to the year 2017 but decreased when compared to Year 2019 due to increase in Trade Payables
3. The Company is constantly maintaining the its current ratio at 1.3 but it has to achieve the current ratio of 2 which is achieved by Dabur and P & G in few
years.
4. The Company is constantly maintaining the Quick ratio around 1 which looks fine.
5. The Company Cash and Cash Equivalents to Current Liabilities is around 0.2 which needs to be improved and it shows that the company is not maintaining
the cash on hand
6. The company is able to generate Cash flow of 0.2 only out of total sales it makes but it is at par with its peers.
7. There is a fluctuation in the Average collection period when compared YOY but its collection period looks fine when compared with its peers.
8. There is a fluctuation in the Average Payment period when compared YOY but its fine when compared with P&G. but the company should think of reducing
the Payable period as the average is 150 days which is nearly 5months.
9. The company is able to maintain its inventory levels constantly when compared with its peers.
"on an overall analysis the company takes around 65 days for realization of cash but it pays to its creditor after 150 days which shows that it is enjoying the cash
earned for nearly 80 days but the cash available to pay the liabilities is around 0.2 only. So, the company has to analyse the utilization of funds and make sure that
proper liquidity is maintained to pay off the liabilities and also think to reduce the Payment period as it brings positive attitude in the minds of Suppliers towards
Company. if the same case is checked the Dabur, Dabur takes 115 days to realize the cash and it pays the creditors also around the same time without maximum
time gap."
Assumptions:
1. Cash flow from Operating Activities is considered from Cash Flow Statement
2. In computation of Cash conversion efficiency ratio and Average collection period Revenue from Operations is considered
3. Assumed cost of Material consumed includes Material consumed, Purchases of Stock in trade and changes in inventory for computation of Average Payment
Period
4. Cost of goods sold is derived by adding Material consumed, Purchase of Stock-in-trade, changes in inventory and Excise duty for computing average inventory
conversion period
Solvency Ratios:
The increase in Equity Multiplier indicates that the assets contributed by shares holders are decreasing and Equity multiplier of HUL decreased from 2.27 to 1.44 due to
issue of new share capital but the equity multiplier of Dabur is constant.
The Net worth if HUL is increased in 2021 due to issue of shares of acquisition of GSK CH and the Net worth of P&G decreased due to dividend pay-out in the Year
2021 and the Net worth of Dabur has increased due to the profits earned during the year.
HUL and P&G are debt free companies but there is small amount of debt in Dabur.
Cash flow generation from operating activities to meet the outside liabilities is decreasing in HUL when compared between 2017 to 2021 but in case of P&G and Dabur
the Cash flow generation from Operating activities to meet the outside liabilities is increasing constantly which is a better indicator. So HUL has to take care with regard
to the generation of cash flow from operating activities to meet the outside liabilities.
Note:
Equity includes Share Capital and Other Equity
Interest coverage ratio is Nil as there is no debt in HUL and P&G and in Dabur though there is a small amount of debt interest coverage is not calculated as the
finance cost includes the Bank charges and Interest cost on Lease Liability
No adjustments made with respect to Income tax assets and liabilities in HUL.
Conclusion:
On an analysis of HUL financials and after comparison with its peers we come to the below conclusions.
1. The Revenue of HUL has increased by 18.50% compared to previous year after integration of GSK CH
and the profit for the year also increased by 18% compared to the previous year which looks good but when
compared the profit to the sales the profit percent remains same with the previous year with no
improvement.
2. The decrease in cash flow from operating activities to current liabilities is an indication of future cash crisis
and it should be carefully observed and the company should find out reasons and should be maintained at
least above 0.5.
3. The company should take steps to reduce the payable days as the existing payable days may create a
negative opinion in the minds of creditors.
4. The Return on Equity has decreased due to the issue of new shares on the combination of GSK CH and
company has to take steps to bring back the rate which means that the performance of the company has to
be increased to a great extent
5. PE ratio of HUL is 65.54 which is less compared to P&G 79.66.
6. P&G has declared a dividend of Rs.315 during the 2021 financial year and HUL has declared a dividend
of Rs.40.50 which effects the sentiments of Investors but the company should give assurance to the
investors about the effective utilization of cash generated by the company.
7. The Dividend Yield of HUL is 1.32 and P&G is 1.55.
On a whole the performance of HUL is satisfactory. The company has completed a major acquisition during the
year and the expectations are very high for the future years as the return on equity and investment has dropped
drastically and the company has to achieve those ratios.