India's Foreign Policy
India's Foreign Policy
India's Foreign Policy
LESSON:4
INDIA’S FOREIGN POLICY
(Earlier named as India’s External relations)
THREE TOPICS TO FOCUS UPON-
• National interest has been the governing principle of India’ foreign policy
even at the time of Nehru who was inspired by the ideal of world peace,
toleration and mutual respect among nations. In operational terms, the
idea of national interest takes the form of concrete objectives of foreign
policy.
• According to Appadorai and M. S. Rajan, there are three fundamental
objectives of India’s Foreign policy:
• 1. The preservation of India’s territorial integrity and independence
of foreign policy:
• 2. Promoting international peace and security:
• 3. Economic development of India:
INDIAN FOREIGN POLICY OBJECTIVES
AND PRINCIPLES
• While keeping in view the fundamental objectives of India’s foreign policy listed
above, India has adopted and pursued certain principles to realize these objectives.
Some of these principles are given in Article 51 under the Directive
Principles of Policy in the Constitution Of India.
• These principles are: promotion of international peace and security; friendly relations
with other countries; respect for international law and international organizations like
the UN; and finally the peaceful settlement of international disputes. The principles of
India’s foreign policy and its objectives are closely interlinked with each other.
ARTICLE 51 INDIAN CONSTITUTION
MOST IMPORTANT- SOME OF THE PRINCIPLES
OF INDIA’S FOREIGN POLICY ARE-
1. Panchsheel policy
2. Policy of Non-alignment
3. Policy of Resisting Colonialism, Imperialism,
Racism
4. Peaceful Settlements of international disputes.
5. Support to UN, International Law and a Just
and Equal World order.
PANCHSHEEL POLICY
• as non aligned, was based on Five Principles ALSO CALLED AS- (PANCHSHEEL
POLICY)
• The Five Principles of Peaceful Coexistence, known as the Panchsheel Treaty:
Non-interference in others internal affairs and respect for each other's territorial
unity integrity and sovereignty (from Sanskrit, panch: five, sheel: virtues), are a set
of principles to govern relations between states. Their first formal codification in
treaty form was in an agreement between China and India in 1954. They were
enunciated in the preamble to the "Agreement (with exchange of notes) on trade and
intercourse between Tibet Region of China and India", which was signed at Peking on
28 April 1954..
• mutual respect for other nations' territorial integrity and sovereignty;
• mutual nonaggression;
• mutual noninterference in internal affairs;
• equality and mutual benefit;
• peaceful coexistence.
AFRO-ASIAN UNITY
⮚India convened the Asian Relations Conference in March
1947, India made earnest efforts for the early realization
of freedom of Indonesia from the Dutch colonial regime
by convening an international conference in 1949 to
support its freedom struggle.
⮚India was a staunch supporter of the de-colonization
process and firmly opposed racism, especially apartheid
in South Africa.
⮚The Afro-Asian conference held in the Indonesian city of
Bandung in 1955, commonly known as the Bandung
Conference, marked the zenith of India’s engagement
with the newly independent Asian and African nations.
⮚The Bandung Conference later led to the establishment
of the NAM. The First Summit of the NAM was held in
Belgrade in September 1961.
DISTANCE FROM TWO CAMPS
✔ India wanted to keep away from the military alliances led by
US and Soviet Union against each other.
✔ the US-led North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) and
the Soviet-led Warsaw Pact came into existence. India
advocated non-alignment as the ideal foreign policy approach.
✔ India did take an independent stand on various international
issues and could get aid and assistance from members of both
the blocs.
✔ The US was not happy about India’s independent initiatives
and the policy of non-alignment. Therefore, there was a
considerable unease in Indo-US relations during the 1950s.
✔ the strategy of planned economic development adopted by
India This development strategy limited India’s economic
interaction with the outside world.
PEACE AND CONFLICT WITH CHINA
⮚China annexed Tibet in 1950 and thus removed a historical buffer between the
two countries.
⮚The Government of India did not oppose annexed of Tibet openly since we
had signed Panchsheel Agreement .
⮚A boundary dispute had surfaced between India and China. India claimed that
the boundary was a matter settled in colonial time, but China said that any
colonial decision did not apply.
⮚. China claimed two areas within the Indian territory: Aksai-chin area in the
Ladakh region of Jammu and Kashmir and much of the state of Arunachal
Pradesh in what was then called NEFA (North Eastern Frontier Agency).
CONTINUED
• The Aksai Chin plateau was and still is virtually unpopulated;
this had made it possible for the Chinese to build their
highway there in the mid-1950s without the Indians finding
out about it until a year after it had been completed. The name
Aksai Chin means “the desert of white stones”
• In the past, some Ladakhi villagers used the area for summer
grazing and made it part of the Cashmere wool trade, but
otherwise there has been no commercial activity.
• China launched a swift and massive invasion in October 1962.
• The first attack lasted one week and Chinese forces captured some
key areas in Arunachal Pradesh(NEFA) The second wave of
attack came next month.
• The war ended when China declared a ceasefire on 21 November 1
• The Soviet Union remained neutral during the conflict. When the
actual Sino-Indo war started Soviets could not support India
because they needed Chinese on their side during Cuban Missile
Crisis.
• It induced a sense of national humiliation and at the same time
strengthened a spirit of nationalism.
• Some of the top army commanders either resigned or were retired.
Nehru’s close associate and the then Defense Minister, V. Krishna
Menon, had to leave the cabinet.
• A No-confidence motion against his government was moved and
debated in the Lok Sabha.
CHINESE ATTACK ON INDIA
• The Sino-Indian conflict affected the opposition as well.
• This and the growing rift between China and the Soviet Union created
irreconcilable differences within the Communist party of India (CPI).
• The pro-USSR faction remained within the CPI and moved towards closer
ties with the Congress.
• The other faction was for sometime closer to China and was against any
ties with the Congress.
• The party split in 1964 and the leaders of the latter faction formed the
Communist party of India (Marxist) (CPI-M). In the wake of the China
war, many leaders of what became CPI (M) were arrested for being pro-
China.
• The war with China alerted Indian leadership
to the volatile situation in the Northeast
region.
• The process of its reorganization began soon
after the China war. Nagaland was granted
statehood; Manipur and Tripura, though
Union Territories, were given the right to
elect their own legislative assemblies.
PRESENT STATUS WITH CHINA
• This year, 2020, marks the 70th anniversary of the establishment of diplomatic relations
between India and China. It was meant to be a year of celebration. But first the COVID-
19 pandemic and now the bloody showdown in Galwan where 20 of Indian Army
personnel lost their lives have exposed the tragic irony of those plans.
• Bilateral diplomacy must however work hard to ensure the implementation of the
consensus between the two militaries to achieve disengagement in areas where the LAC
in Ladakh is subject to overlapping interpretations. Sober choices have to be made by
both countries and there is definitely a need to focus on the “big picture” of bilateral
relations.
• The challenge of India and China rubbing up against each other, as
Nehru said long ago, is one that runs across the spine of Asia. A
conflict between India and China has implications that go far beyond
our borders. It is unfortunate that in this 70th year of the establishment
of diplomatic relations between them, peaceful coexistence has been
replaced by armed coexistence.
• 1. Those Indian analysts who see international politics largely in terms of military
power are fearful of the growing closeness between India and the US. They would
prefer that India maintains its aloofness from Washington and focuses upon
increasing its own comprehensive national power.
• 2. Other analysts see the growing convergence of interests between the US and
India as a historic opportunity for India. They advocate a strategy that would allow
India to take advantage of US hegemony and the mutual convergences to establish
the best possible options for itself. Opposing the US, they argue, is a futile strategy
that will only hurt India in the long run.
• 3. A third group of analysts would advocate that India should take the lead in
establishing a coalition of countries from the developing world. Over time, this
coalition would become more powerful and may succeed in weaning the
hegemony away from its dominating ways.
Benjamin Netanyahu termed Israel’s
relations with India as a "marriage made
in heaven but consecrated here on earth".
∙ There is “prosperity, peace and
progress” in bilateral ties.
ENGAGEMENT DURING COVID
• The border conflict with China has forced India to speed up the purchase of
military hardware including fighter jets, smart air-to-ground weapons, missiles,
rockets, multi-mission drones, air defence systems, GPS-guided artillery
ammunition, tank ammunition and even assault rifles.
• The United States, Russia, France and Israel are among the countries that India
plans to import the weaponry from.
• India is looking at sourcing from Israel the Firefly loitering ammunition, Spike
anti-tank guided missiles, Spice guidance kits that can mounted on standard bombs
to convert them into smart weapons and an operational surface-to-air missile
system.
• at a time India is making emergency military purchases from several countries
including Israel to bolster the military’s capabilities amid border tensions with
China in eastern Ladakh.
WAY AHEAD ☺ ☺
• It
is imperative that for the partnership to
realise its full potential, both India and Israel
behave as mature democracies and try to
understand and appreciate the compulsions of
each other on a variety of regional and
international issues. It could lead to a healthy
and strong relationship between these two
major powers in the international system.
INDIA’S NUCLEAR POLICY
INDIA’S NUCLEAR POLICY
• The first nuclear testing undertaken by India in may 1974.
• In May 1974, India has conducted its first nuclear test in
Pokharan with the codename of "Smiling Buddha".
• Between 11 and 13 May, 1998, five nuclear tests were conducted
as a part of the series of Pokhran-II. These tests were
collectively called Operation Shakti–98.
• Nuclear programme of India was initiated in the late 1940s
under the guidance of Homi J. Bhabha.
• His proposal was accepted and the Atomic Energy Commission
was established in 1948. Bhabha was appointed its first director.
• Nehru had always put his faith in science and technology for
rapidly building a modern India
• Nehru was against nuclear weapons so he pleaded with the
superpowers for comprehensive nuclear disarmament.
However, the nuclear arsenal kept rising.
INDIA’S NUCLEAR POLICY
• Historical Background
• Nuclear programme of India was initiated in the late 1940s under the guidance
of Homi J. Bhabha.
• Nehru was against nuclear weapons so he pleaded with the superpowers
for comprehensive nuclear disarmament. However, the nuclear arsenal kept
rising.
• When Communist China conducted the nuclear tests in October 1964, the five
nuclear powers (US, USSR, UK, France, and China) also the five Permanent
Members of the UN Security Council had tried to impose the Nuclear Non-
proliferation Treaty (NPT) of 1968 on the rest of the world.
India has a declared nuclear no-first-use policy and is in the process of
developing a nuclear doctrine based on "credible minimum
deterrence.“