Cuel CPT Report

By: Alexander Wijaya
CUEL Limited Date: 23rd August 2007

CPT REPORT Page: Page 1 of 12
PLETs and SSIVs Fabrication Project

ALLSEAS RELIANCE DHIRUBHAI 1 & 3 DEVELOPMENT PROJECT
COATING PROCEDURE TEST (CPT)

SURFACE PREPARATION & PROTECTIVE COATING
Originated by Reviewed by Approved by
ALEXANDER WIJAYA ALLSEAS BECHTEL FRANCE

CUEL/DSL CHIEF INSPECTOR REPRESENTATIVE REPRESENTATIVE
1. OBJECTIVE
The purpose of this Coating Procedure Test (CPT) Report is to comply with the
requirement of Norsok M-501 clause 4.12 (records and reports) where all
measurements and inspection results that have been taken and agreed by all
parties shall be recorded precisely in an appropriate manner and thus presented
in a systematic and comprehensive report in order to maintain adequate
traceability and provide sufficient information.
2. NORMATIVE REFERENCES
2.1 Main References
The following references were used as the main basis for conducting the Coating
Procedure Test:
NORSOK M-501 Surface Preparation and Protective Coatings

ISO 20340 Paints and Varnishes – Performance Requirements
for Protective Paint Systems for Offshore and Related
Structures
ISO 12944-5 Paints and Varnishes – Corrosion Protection of Steel
by Protective Paint Systems – Part 5: Protective Paint
Systems
ALL0701V-CON-Q-SPI-0002 Project Specific Procedural Instruction
2.2 CPT Standard Practices
Methods for surface preparation and coating application during execution of the
CPT were based on the following standards where all of them are listed in
sequence:
ASTM E337 Standard test method for measuring humidity with a

psychrometer
ISO 8501-1 Preparation of steel substrates before application of
paints and related products: Visual assessment of
surface cleanliness, Part 1: Rust grades and
preparation grades of uncoated steel substrates and
of steel substrates after overall removal of previous
coatings
paints and related products, Visual assessment of
surface cleanliness, Part 3: Preparation grades of
welds, edges and other areas with surface
imperfections
SSPC-SP1 Solvent cleaning
SSPC-SP2 / SSPC-SP3 Hand-tools cleaning / Power-tools cleaning
ASTM D4285 Standard test method for indicating oil or water in
compressed Air

paints and related products: Test methods for
metallic blast-cleaning abrasives, Part 2:
Determination of particle size distribution
paints and related products: Test methods for
metallic blast-cleaning abrasives, Part 6:
Determination of foreign matter
ASTM D4940 Standard test method for conductimetric analysis of
water soluble ionic contamination of blasting
abrasives
paints and related products: Surface preparation
methods, Part 2: Abrasive blast-cleaning
paints and related products: Surface roughness
characteristics of blast-cleaned steel substrates, Part
5: Replica tape method for the determination of the
surface profile
paints and related products: Tests for the
assessment of surface cleanliness, Part 3:
Assessment of dust on steel surfaces prepared for
painting (pressure-sensitive tape method)
assessment of surface cleanliness, Part 4: Guidance
on the estimation of the probability of condensation
prior to paint application
assessment of surface cleanliness, Part 6: Extraction
of water-soluble contaminants for analysis - Bresle
method
paints and related products: Test for the assessment
of surface cleanliness, Part 9: Field method for the
conductimetric determination of water soluble salts.
SSPC-PA1 Shop, field, and maintenance painting of steel
ASTM D4414A Standard practice for measurement of wet film
thickness by notch gages
SSPC-PA2 Measurement of dry coating with magnetic gages
ISO 19840 Paints and Varnishes – Corrosion protection of steel
structures by protective paint systems: Measurement
of, and acceptance criteria for, the thickness of dry
film on rough surfaces
NACE RP0188 Discontinuity (holiday) testing of new protective
coatings on conductive substrates
ISO 4624 Paints and varnishes – Pull-off test for adhesion
2.3 Personnel Assessment Standards
The following methods were used for evaluating the personnel skills and
competences:
ASTM D4228 Standard practice for qualification of coating

applicators for application of coatings to steel surface
3. TEST PANEL AND COATING MATERIALS
3.1 Test Panel
A test panel with size of 1m x 1m and containing of 2 pipe-ends from two

standing pipes, 1 angle and 1 flat bar was used in the execution of CPT for
qualifying all the coating procedures. This test panel has been approved by the
owner representative prior to its selection as well as was witnessed during
execution of CPT.
Test Panel: Before fabrication Test Panel: After fabrication
3.2 Coating Materials
Coating materials from a single source supplied by International Paints were used
for the CPT. The coating system consisted of primer and top coat where both of
them are the same materials which is Interzone 954 Modified Epoxy, except, they
are differentiated by the color. The primer is gray while the top coat is yellow.
The primer is gray in color.

Product code for Part A is
EAXN35 and EAA964 for
Part B. Shelf life not exceed
expiration date. Supplied
with valid batch certificate.
The top coat is yellow in

color. Product code for Part
A is EAG135 and EAA964
for Part B. Shelf life not
exceed expiration date.
Supplied with valid batch
certificate.
4. APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS
This section of the report summarizes all the important application requirements
and their acceptance/rejection criteria.
4.1 Equipment protection and clean up
The test panel shall be fully protected from mechanical damages, ingress of
abrasives and dust from blast cleaning. Sags, droplets and paint over-spray
(inclusive dry-spray) shall be avoided. Areas not to be painted shall be protected
with a step of 100 mm. On completion of the work in any area, all masking
materials, spent abrasives, equipment etc. shall be removed.
4.2 Ambient conditions
No final blast cleaning or coating application shall be done if the relative humidity
is more than 80% and when the steel temperature is less than 3 °C above the
dew point. Coating shall not be applied at ambient temperature above 50 °C.
The coating manufacturer shall specify the maximum and minimum application
and curing temperature and other relevant limitations regarding application and
curing conditions for each product in any coating system.
4.3 Coating materials
All coating materials and solvents shall be protected from ignition sources and
shall remain within storage temperatures and storage conditions recommended
by the coating manufacturer.
All coating materials and solvents shall be stored in the original container bearing
the manufacturer's label and instructions. Each product shall have a batch
number showing year and month of manufacture and giving full traceability of
production. Shelf life shall not exceed the expiration date.
4.4 Steel material
Steel subject to surface preparation on site shall as a minimum requirement be in

accordance with rust grade B according to ISO 8501-1.
4.5 Pre-blasting preparation
Sharp edges, fillets, corners and welds shall be rounded or smoothened by

grinding (minimum radius 2 mm).
Hard surface layers (e.g. resulting from flame cutting) shall be removed by
grinding prior to blast cleaning.
The surfaces shall be free from any foreign matter such as weld flux, residue,
slivers, oil, grease, salt etc. prior to blast cleaning. All surfaces should be washed
with clean fresh water prior to blast cleaning.
Any oil and grease contamination shall be removed in accordance with

SSPC/SSPM Volume 2, grade SP1, prior to blasting operations.
Any major surface defects, particularly surface laminations or scabs detrimental

to the protective coating system shall be removed by suitable dressing. Where
such defects have been revealed during blast cleaning, and dressing has been
performed, the dressed area shall be re-blasted to the specified standard.
All welds shall be inspected and if necessary repaired prior to final blast cleaning
of the area. Surface pores, cavities etc. shall be removed by suitable dressing or
weld repair.
4.6 Blast cleaning
Blasting abrasives shall be dry, clean and free from contaminants, which will be
detrimental to the performance of the coating.
Size of abrasive particles for blast cleaning shall be capable to produce surface
profile height (anchor pattern profile) of 50 – 85 microns. This surface profile
shall be measured in accordance with ISO 8503.
The cleanliness of the blast cleaned surface shall meet the requirement of at least
ISO 8501-1 Sa 2½
The surface to be coated shall be clean, dry, free from oil/grease, and have the
specified roughness and cleanliness until the first coat is applied. Dust, blast
abrasives etc. shall be removed from the surface after blast cleaning such that
the particle quantity and particle size do not exceed rating 2 of ISO 8502-3.
The maximum content of soluble impurities on the blasted surface as sampled

using ISO 8502-6 and distilled water, shall not exceed a conductivity measured in
accordance with ISO 8502-9 corresponding to a NaCl content of 20 mg/m2.
4.7 Paint application
The first coat or primer shall be applied within 4 (four) hours after blasting to
avoid oxidation
Mixing, mix ratio, thinning, working pot life, drying and curing time, coating
interval time, and method of application should be in accordance with the
material’s technical data
For each coat, a stripe coat shall be applied by brush to all welds, corners, behind
angles, edges of beams etc. and areas not fully reachable by spray in order to
obtain the specified coverage and thickness.
Each coat shall be applied uniformly over the entire surface. Skips, runs, sags and
drips shall be avoided. Each coat shall be free from pinholes, blisters and
holidays. Contamination of painted surfaces between coats shall be avoided. Any
contamination shall be removed.
Wet film thickness should be measured for each coating applied in order to make
sure the nominal dry film thickness will be achieved and within the range of
acceptable criteria as specified by ISO 19840 or SSPC-PA2
Dry film thickness instrument to be used shall be of electromagnetic gage

specified by SSPC-PA2, method of measurement and acceptance/rejection criteria
shall meet the minimum requirement of SSPC-PA2 or ISO 19840.
Total dry film thickness required is at least 450 microns consisted of a minimum
225 microns for primer and a minimum of 225 microns for top coat.
4.8 Testing of application quality
After the coating cures, holiday test in accordance with NACE-RP0188 shall be
done to trace for any discontinuity.
Pull-off adhesion test shall be also performed in accordance with ISO 4624 and
must meet the minimum adhesion of 5.0 MPa.
4.9 Test panel results
A copy of the test panel result shall be issued for review / approval and signature
by all parties. A report shall be presented includes the records.
4.10 Health, safety, and environment
MSDS shall be provided by paint manufacturer and used when evaluating coating
systems
All works to be carried shall comply with the minimum requirements of SSPC-PA3
Safety in Coating Operation or NACE 6D163 Painter’s Safety.
5. COATING PROCEDURE TEST
5.1 Pre-qualification of coating materials
Surface Pre-Inspection: Environmental Tests:

• Check Fabrication Details • Check Ambient Temp 0C
• Check Rust Condition • Check Surface Temp 0C
• Check Other Contaminants • Check Dewpoint C
0
• Check Relative Humidity

Surface Pre-Cleaning:
• SSPC SP1 Degreasing Coating Application:
• SSPC SP2 Hand-tools • Check Mixing
• SSPC SP3 Power-tools • Check Induction Time
• Check Stripe Coat
Abrasive Inspection: • Check Spray Tip Size
• Check Type & Mesh Size • Check Atomizing Pressure
• Check Dirt, Oil, and Other • Check Proper WFT
Contaminants
• Check Salts on Abrasive
Dry Film Thickness:
• Calibrate Instrument
Equipment Inspection: • Take DFT Readings
• Check Oil & Water Trap • Mark Rejected Spot
• Check Hoses Condition
• Check Clamps & Couplings
• Check Blast Pot Condition Visual Inspection:
• Check Nozzle Type & Size • Check for any Application
Defect
• Check Air Stream Quality
• Immediate Action
Surface Cleaning Method:

Holiday Detection:
• Minimum ISO 8501-1 Sa 2½
• Calibrate Instrument
• Check Pin Hole(s)
Surface Profile/Anchor Pattern: • Mark Located Pin Hole(s)
• Check by Replica Tape
Pull-off Adhesion Test:
• Environment Conditions
Surface Dirt/Dust Assessment:
• Check Surface Cleanliness
• Check Surface Cleanliness
• Prepare & Locate Dollies
• Check Curing of Adhesive
Surface Conductivity Test: • Perform the Test
• Check by Bresle • Check Adhesion/Cohesion
5.2 Qualification of Personnel
The method employed in assessing qualification of paint operators consist of

thorough demonstration of proper operation of the equipment and application
techniques, including class-room training conducted to assess and upgrade their
knowledge. Basic judgments are focused on their skill and knowledge related to
health and safety hazard in coating operation, use of protective equipment,
surface pre-cleaning, abrasive blast cleaning, various degree of surface
cleanliness, coating materials and restriction, mixing and thinning, coating pot-
life, coating interval time, curing time, application methods, equipment set-up,
proper spraying techniques, measuring of wet film thickness and identifying of
common application defects as well as taking corrective action to avoid such
defects. Based on these capabilities they are then qualified accordingly to the
three tradesman levels which are elaborated as followings:
• BP3 : Blaster/Painter who has been qualified to do external and internal

painting application, include special application on various materials and
surfaces and will be considered as Master Craftsman.
• BP2 : Blaster/Painter who has been qualified to do external and internal
painting application, but not authorized to undertake special application on
various materials and surfaces other than paints and steel, and will be
considered as Craftsman.
• BP1 : Blaster/Painter who has been qualified to do external painting
application but not authorized to do lining and special application on various
materials and surfaces other than paints and steel, and will be considered as
Apprentice.
Note: Above qualification was adopted from NACE RP0495 and was modified to fit
local condition.
6. RESULT & FINDING OF CPT
The results of CPT was summarized and presented in the following tabulations.
Detailed description and results of each procedure are attached as appendix 1.
Other important documentation such as inspectors’ qualification, coating material
batch certificates, and inspection equipment calibration certificates are also
attached to support this report.
6.1 Procedure, Inspection and Testing
Procedure, Method Standard Acceptance Result* Remark

Inspection & Reference Criteria
Testing
Environmental Ambient & Steel ASTM E337 Ambient 10-500C 1 2 3
Conditions Temp., Relative Steel temp. 30C 0
AT 36 37 32 C
Humidity, and above dewpoint COMPLY
0
Dewpoint Relative humidity ST 33 35 32 C
below 80% DP 26 27 27 0
C
RH 55 56 61 %
Rust Grade Visual ISO 8501-1 Minimum Grade B Rust Grade B COMPLY
Examination
Fabrication Detail Visual ISO 8501-3 No defect No defect
Examination COMPLY
Degreasing Solvent Cleaning SSPC-SP1 No oil and grease No oil and grease found COMPLY
Pre-blasting Hand-/Power SSPC-SP2 / No sharp edges, Proper Ground of Edge
Tools Cleaning SSPC-SP3 weld spatters, and Corner, and No Weld COMPLY
skip welds, and Spatter and Skip Weld
surface were found
imperfection
Equipment Blotter Test ASTM D4285 No oil and water No oil and water
Conditions detected on the blotter COMPLY
paper
Abrasive Vial Test SSPC AB2 No dirt, oil, and No dirt, oil, and foreign
Conditions foreign contami- contaminant detected COMPLY
nants
Conductivity Test ASTM D4940 5 mS/m 4.9 mS/m COMPLY
Cleanliness Dry Abrasive ISO 8501-1 Minimum Sa2½ ISO 8501-1 Sa3 COMPLY
Blasting
Dust Assessment 1S0 8502-3 Rating 2 Rating 2 COMPLY
Bresle Test ISO 8502-6 <20 mg/m2 19 mg/m2 COMPLY
Roughness/Profile Testex Replica ISO 8503-5 50 – 85 microns 82 microns COMPLY
and Anvil Gage
Mixing Mixing of A & B SSPC-PA1 Pneuma. Accurate proportion of
No Thinning Agitation (vortex mixing in accordance
flow) with ratio stated in COMPLY
technical data and
properly agitated
Stripe Coating Stripe Coat by SSPC-PA1 Applied to welds, Appropriately done in
Brush corners, behind proper manner COMPLY
angles, edges
and areas not
fully reachable by
spray
WFT Wet Film Measuring wet ASTM D4414 Instrument to be Proper conditions and in
Thickness film thickness used is WFT accordance with specifi-
Comb and made cation of ASTM D4414 COMPLY
of SST. Gage
notches of WFT
instrument
should be clean
and no defect
DFT Dry Film Measuring dry SSPC-PA2/ 1st coat (gray) 1st coat (gray)
Thickness film thickness ISO19840 min. 225 µm ave. 249 µm
2nd coat (yellow) 2nd coat (yellow) COMPLY
min. 225 µm ave. 310 µm
Total DFT Total DFT
min. 450 µm ave. 559 µm
Final Coating Film Visual SSPC-PA1 Applied No skip, run, sag, and
Appearance Observation uniformly, no drip detected on the test
skip, run, sag, panel flat surface, except COMPLY
and drip on both pipes were found
some orange-peel
Holiday Test Wet-Sponge Low NACE No Holiday No Holiday at 2.5 kV
Voltage Holiday RP0188 COMPLY
Detector
Adhesion Test Pull-Off Adhesion ISO4624 Min. 5.0 MPa Average 9.0 MPa COMPLY
Test Dolly
*see detailed result and description of each procedure at appendix 01.
6.2 Coating Personnel Assessment and Qualification
No Name of Personnel Skill Knowledge Qualified Remark

To Be
01 Kong Pakdeelon A A- BP3 Master Craftsman
02 Somkiat Saleewong A A- BP3 Master Craftsman
03 Suphachai Anaka A A BP3 Master Craftsman
04 Salavoot Laphaphan B+ C BP1 Apprentice
05 Siriwichai Pamanet B B BP2 Craftsman
06 Pichai Keawwanna B+ B BP2 Craftsman
07 Prasart Wantoe A- A- BP3 Master Craftsman
08 Kriangkai Sridajitr B+ B- BP2 Craftsman
09 Boonjan Sriharat B+ B+ BP2 Craftsman
10 Supin Photison B B BP2 Craftsman
11 Prasong Arsar B+ B+ BP2 Craftsman
12 Khampa Sridaphan B B- BP2 Craftsman
13 Mungkorn Kaewjanlah B B- BP2 Craftsman
14 Thongchai Pradu A A BP3 Master Craftsman
15 Yuthakarn Kenprom B B- BP1 Craftsman
16 Veera Yeesawat B+ B BP2 Craftsman
17 Sak Buatib B+ B BP2 Craftsman
18 Artit Suwandee B+ B BP2 Craftsman
19 Veerachai Konwimol B B BP2 Craftsman
20 Jansri Prasarntong B- C BP1 Apprentice
21 Jan Kusol B+ B+ BP2 Craftsman
22 Pittaya Saensradee B B- BP2 Craftsman
23 Sarn Saenbuddee B+ B BP2 Craftsman
24 Boonhaing Manorat B B- BP2 Craftsman
25 Khamphan Romkla B B- BP2 Craftsman
26 Hiaw Duangket C C BP1 Apprentice
27 Khamrak Dasar A- A- BP3 Master Craftsman
28 Veera Srinoi B B BP2 Craftsman
29 Charin Manorat B B- BP2 Craftsman
30 Manas Boontanee B+ B- BP2 Craftsman
31 Dechnarong Kaewchana B+ B+ BP2 Craftsman
32 Suteep Taemsri B- C BP1 Apprentice
33 Prajak Promkasikorn B B- BP2 Craftsman
34 Boonlom Khammongkul B C BP1 Apprentice
35 Manop Sabai B+ B+ BP2 Craftsman
36 Suchart Sompong B B BP2 Craftsman
37 Paisarn Kulmuangkon A A BP3 Master Craftsman
38 Sooksanti Sripratoom C C BP1 Apprentice
39 Prawan Jansook B C BP1 Apprentice
40 Siri Musikawan B B BP2 Craftsman
41 Khamlee Barlee B B- BP1 Craftsman
42 Chuttimun Nakarungsu B+ B BP2 Craftsman
43 Tongpoon Bumrung B+ B BP2 Craftsman
44 Prasit Musikawan B- C BP1 Apprentice
45 Nikom Kaewmook B+ B BP2 Craftsman
46 Soontorn Thanormpong B+ B BP2 Craftsman
47 Sarkorn Amnauy B C BP1 Apprentice
48 Chairat Unsamai A A- BP3 Master Craftsman
Assessment of Personnel Qualification (August 20 – 21, 2007)
Training to Coating Personnel

Conducted at DSL Laemchabang Yard Thailand
August 23 – 24, 2007
CUEL Limited
C PT A PPE ND IX I
R ECORDS OF PRE -QUA LIF ICA TION OF
C OAT ING MA TER IA LS
RECORD : 01
TEST METHOD : ENVIRONMENTAL TEST
STANDARD : ASTM E337
PURPOSE
To measure ambient and surface temperature, dewpoint, and relative humidity prior to,
during, and after blasting and painting operation with interval not longer than 4 (four)
hours for each measurement.
APPARATUS
ELCOMETER 319 DEWPOINT METER
PROCEDURE
1. Hold the gauge with the probe in the area to be measured. If measuring surface
temperature, hold the gauge with the tip of the probe in contact with the surface to be
measured. For good contact, hold the gauge perpendicular to the surface.
2. Use the arrow buttons and to select the parameter required (ambient, surface,
dewpoint or ΔT). Relative humidity and the selected temperature will be shown on the
display.
3. Press to freeze the current readings on the display (display shows HOLD) and record
the reading.
FINDING AND ACCEPTANCE/REJECTION
Aug.18 Aug.18 Aug.19 Acceptance

Before Blasting After Blasting nd
Before 2 Coat Criteria
Before 1st Coat
(1) (2) (3)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ambient 0C 36 37 32 10 - 50
Steel Surface 0C 33 35 32 3C above DP
Dew Point 0C 26 27 27
Relative Humidity % 55 56 61 below 85%
CONCLUSION
Surface preparation and painting operation were permitted to proceed because
environment condition within the acceptance criteria.
Conducted by Approved by Witnessed by Witnessed by
Jarun Khemthong Alexander Wijaya

CUEL Painting Inspector NACE Cert. Coating Inspector Bechtel Representative Allseas Representative
NACE Cert. Corrosion Technologist
CUEL Limited
C PT A PPE ND IX I
RECORD : 02
TEST METHOD : IDENTIFICATION OF RUST GRADE
STANDARD : ISO 8501-1
PURPOSE
The initial identification of rust grade will determine the amount of surface contaminants
such rust and mill scale that can induce premature coating failure. Also, this initial
identification serves as very important guide when comparing degree of surface
cleanliness with the standard photographic after abrasive blast cleaning. Thus,
thoroughly examine the steel surface before initiating any surface preparation will help
to establish its conditions to define the things that need to be addressed in the surface
preparation protocol.
APPARATUS
ISO 8501-1:1988 STANDARD PHOTOGRAPHIC
PROCEDURE
1. Select the photograph of the rust grade (A, B, C, or D) that most closely represents
the appearance of the steel surface to be cleaned.
A: Steel surface is covered completely with adherent mill scale and little, if
any, rust.
B: Steel surface has begun to rust and the mill scale has begun to flake.
C: Steel surface has the mill scale either rusted away or removable by
scraping; little pitting is visible to the naked eye.
D: Steel surface has the mill scale rusted away and has considerable pitting
visible to the naked eye.
2. Record this initial identification of rust grade

Initial condition of test panel steel surface is identified as rust grade B.
Norsok M501 Acceptance Criteria:

Acceptance Criteria for CPT test panel is at least rust grade B.
CONCLUSION
Test panel is complied to Norsok M501 Requirement.

CUEL Limited
C PT A PPE ND IX I
RECORD : 03
TEST METHOD : IDENTIFICATION OF FABRICATION DEFECTS
PURPOSE
Coatings tend to draw thin and pull away from sharp edges and projections, leaving little
or no coating to protect the underlying steel, thereby increasing the potential for coating
failure. Other features which are difficult to properly cover and protect include crevices,
weld porosity, skip weld and laminations. Thus, identifying surface defects would help to
determine the necessary actions needed to be taken prior to abrasive blasting.
APPARATUS
VISUAL EXAMINATION
PROCEDURE
1. Examine the surface defects prior to surface preparation. Identifying all the potential
factors such as sharp edge, corner, weld porosity, weld smoke, weld spatter, skip weld
and lamination that tends to create premature coating failure
2. Mark location of any surface imperfection and defects on the test panel as it will be
easily identified for further treatment or action.

Sharp edge, rough weld, and weld smoke

Sharp edge must be ground smooth to at least 2.0 mm
Rough weld must be ground smooth to remove any sharp protrusion
Weld smoke must be cleaned properly to avoid coating adhesion failure
CONCLUSION
Test panel needs further treatment for SSPC-SP1 Solvent Cleaning and SSPC-SP2/SP3
Hand-/Power-Tools Cleaning prior to abrasive blasting.

CUEL Limited
C PT A PPE ND IX I
RECORD : 04
TEST METHOD : DEGREASING / SOLVENT CLEANING
STANDARD : SSPC-SP1
PURPOSE
Solvent cleaning is a method for removing all visible oil, grease, soil, drawing and cutting
compounds, and other soluble contaminants from steel surfaces. It shall be used prior to
the application of paint and in conjunction with surface preparation methods specified for
the removal of rust, mill scale, or paint.
APPARATUS
WIRE BRUSH AND SCRAPE
PROCEDURE
1. Remove heavy oil or grease first by scraper. Then remove the remaining oil or grease
by wiping or scrubbing the surface with rags or brushes wetted with solvent
2. Use clean solvent and clean rags or brushes for the final wiping.

No oil or grease found on the surface

No oil or grease on the test panel
CONCLUSION
Complied to Norsok M501 requirement

CUEL Limited
C PT A PPE ND IX I
RECORD : 05
TEST METHOD : HAND- / POWER-TOOL CLEANING
STANDARD : SSPC-SP2 / SSPC-SP3
PURPOSE
Removes all loose mill scale, loose rust, loose paint, and other loose detrimental foreign
matter. It is not intended that adherent mill scale, rust, and paint be removed by this
process. Mill scale, rust, and paint are considered adherent if they cannot be removed by
lifting with a dull putty knife.
APPARATUS
WIRE BRUSH, POWER ABRADING, AND ROTARY TOOLS
PROCEDURE
1. Before power tool cleaning, remove visible oil, grease, soluble welding residue, and
salts by the methods outlined in SSPC-SP 1.
2. Remove stratified rust (rust scale), weld slag, weld spatter, loose mill scale, and loose
adherent contaminants
3. Any sharp edge, corner, protrusion, and irregularity surface of welding shall be ground
smooth to at least 2.0 mm.
4. Remove dirt, dust, or similar contaminants from the surface. Acceptable methods
include brushing, blow off with clean, dry air, or vacuum cleaning.

Proper ground, smooth-edge, no weld spatter on the test panel and skip weld is not
found.

Sharp edges, fillets, corners and welds shall be rounded or smoothened by grinding
(minimum radius 2 mm). Hard surface layers (e.g. resulting from flame cutting) shall be
removed by grinding prior to blast cleaning. The surface shall be free from any foreign
matter such as weld flux, residue, slivers, oil, grease, salt etc. prior to blast cleaning. All
welds and surface defects shall be inspected and any detrimental to the protective
coating system shall be removed by suitable dressing.
CONCLUSION

CUEL Limited
C PT A PPE ND IX I
RECORD : 06
TEST METHOD : OIL AND WATER DETECTION IN COMPRESSED AIR
STANDARD : ASTM D4285
PURPOSE
This procedure detects the presence of oil and water in the compressed air that is
detrimental to the adhesion of protective coatings.
APPARATUS
VISUAL OBSERVATION OF OIL/WATER TRAP
BLOTTER PAPER
PROCEDURE
1. Check if abrasive blast equipment or compressor is equipped with oil and water trap of
proper size and capacity.
2. Place the blotter paper appropriately on the surface.
3. Point the blast nozzle directly to the center of blotter paper in a distance of 50-60 cm
and make sure the check valve for abrasive is closed properly.
4. Other operator should open the air valve of compressed air to the blast nozzle, then
pull the trigger of death-man valve to allow air flowing out from the nozzle to the center
of blotter paper
5. With compressed air coming out from the blast nozzle, hold tightly the blast nozzle to
make sure this compressed air will hit the center of blotter paper. Do it for about 1
minute.
6. Check the presence of oil and water on the blotter paper and record the finding.

No oil and water found in the blotter paper. Compressed air is cleaned because
equipment is well equipped with oil/water trap of proper sizing.

The compressed air must be totally free from oil and water (ASTM D4285)
CONCLUSION

CUEL Limited
C PT A PPE ND IX I
RECORD : 07
TEST METHOD : ABRASIVE QUALITY (VIAL TEST)
STANDARD : SSPC-AB2
PURPOSE
This procedure inspects the cleanliness of recycled ferrous metallic blast cleaning
abrasives used for abrasive blasting
APPARATUS
CLEAN TRANSPARENT CONTAINER
PROCEDURE
1. Get a representative sample of cleaned ferrous metallic abrasive
2. Put them into a clean and dry transparent container
3. Fill-up the container with de-ionize water
4. Stir the abrasive properly for about 1 minute and let them stand for about 10 minutes
5. Check the presence of oil in the water

No oil contamination found in the test

Blasting abrasives shall be dry, clean and free from contaminants, which will be
detrimental to the performance of the coating.
CONCLUSION

CUEL Limited
C PT A PPE ND IX I
RECORD : 08
TEST METHOD : ABRASIVE QUALITY (CONDUCTIVITY)
STANDARD : ASTM D4940
PURPOSE
This procedure evaluates the presence of ionic contamination in the abrasive by
determining the total concentration of water soluble ionic contaminants by means of a
conductivity test.
APPARATUS
CONDUCTIVITY METER
PROCEDURE
1. Rinse the conductivity cell in reagent water until the rinse water is a cleanliness of 5.0
μmho/cm (0.5 mS/m) or less.
2. From the procedure mentioned at appendix I record 07, extract the water with a clean
pipette
3. Wet the cell of the conductivity meter with the extracted water
4. Read and record the finding

Water soluble ionic contaminants in the abrasive is 49 µS/cm. This equals to 4.9 mS/m
Conductivity of water Water soluble ionic conductivity

0 µS/cm 49 µS/cm
ASTM D4940 Acceptance Criteria:

A typical value of conductivity for a high level of contamination is 500 μmho/cm (50
mS/m). A typical value for a low level of contamination is 50 μmho/cm (5 mS/m)
Note:
µS (microSiemen) and mS (miliSiemen)
CUEL Limited
C PT A PPE ND IX I
CONCLUSION
Complied to the ASTM D4940 requirement and abrasive contains low level of
contamination

CUEL Limited
C PT A PPE ND IX I
RECORD : 09
TEST METHOD : SURFACE CLEANLINESS (DEGREE OF CLEANLINESS OF
ABRASIVE BLASTING)
PURPOSE
This procedure describes the use of standard reference photographs depicting the
appearance of previously unpainted hot-rolled carbon steel after abrasive blast cleaning,
particularly to know whether the degree of surface cleanliness being specified has met
the minimum requirement.
APPARATUS
STANDARD PHOTOGRAPHIC OF ISO 8501-1:1988
PROCEDURE
1. Determine the degree of cleaning that is specified
2. Determine which photograph depicts the finished surface.
For example, if the initial rust grade is “B” and very thorough blast cleaning (ISO 8501-
1:1988 Sa2½) is specified, use photograph B Sa 2½.
3. Compare the prepared surface with the photograph selected in point 2 above to
evaluate the degree of cleaning.
4. If it does not look alike, use other “B” standard photograph degree of cleaning to
compare that surface.
5. Record the finding.

Degree of cleaning of the prepared steel surface attained is ISO Sa 3 (Blasting to visually
cleaned metal).
Test panel after abrasive cleaning

ISO 8501-1:1988 Sa 3
CUEL Limited
C PT A PPE ND IX I
Additional Information:
Blasting nozzle used : No. #6
Blasting pressure : 80 psi
Abrasive used : Steel Grit #G40
Compressor type : Oil-free compressor
ISO 8501-1:1998 Sa3

When viewed without magnification, the surface shall be free from visible oil, grease and
dirt, and shall be free from mill scale, rust, paint coatings and foreign matter. It shall
have a uniform metallic color.
ISO 8501-1:1988 Sa2½

dirt, and from mill scale, rust, paint coatings and foreign matter. Any remaining traces of
contamination shall show only as slight stains in the form of spots or stripes.
ISO 8501-1:1988 Sa2

dirt and from most of the mill scale, rust, paint coatings and foreign matter. Any residual
contamination shall be firmly adhering.
ISO 8501-1:1988 Sa1

dirt, and from poorly adhering mill scale, rust, paint coatings and foreign matter.

The degree of cleanliness of the prepared steel surface must be at least ISO Sa 2½ (very
thorough blast cleaning).
CONCLUSION

CUEL Limited
C PT A PPE ND IX I
RECORD : 10
TEST METHOD : SURFACE CLEANLINESS (DUST LEVEL PRIOR TO PAINTING)
PURPOSE
This procedure describes the use of standard reference photographs depicting the
appearance of previously unpainted hot-rolled carbon steel after abrasive blast cleaning,
particularly to know whether the degree of surface cleanliness of the steel surface being
prepared has met the minimum requirement.
APPARATUS
CELLOPHANE TRANSPARENT TAPE
ISO 8502-3 PICTORIAL STANDARD
PROCEDURE
1. Remove and discard the first three turns of tape from the roll and then remove a
piece about 200 mm long.
2. Touching the adhesive side of the tape only at the ends, press about 150 mm of
freshly exposed tape firmly onto the surface under test.
3. Assess the quantity of dust on the tape by comparing visually an area of the tape with
equivalent size areas of the pictorial reference of ISO 8502-3. Record the rating
corresponding to the reference that is the closest match.

ISO 8502-3 Rating 2 (particles just visible with normal or corrected vision (usually
particles between 50 µm and 100 µm in diameter).

After blast cleaning, particle quantity and size of dust should not exceed rating 2 of ISO
8502-3.
CONCLUSION

CUEL Limited
C PT A PPE ND IX I
RECORD : 11
TEST METHOD : SURFACE CLEANLINESS (BRESLE TEST)
STANDARD : ISO 8502-6 & ISO 8502-9
PURPOSE
This procedure describes the method of extracting soluble contaminants from a surface
by use of flexible cell in the form of adhesive patch which can be attached to any
surface. It is a field method to determine the presence of soluble contaminants before
painting.
APPARATUS
ELCOMETER 138 BRESLE KIT AND PATCH
PROCEDURE
1. Remove the protective paper and the square in the centre of the patch.
2. Attach the Elcometer 135B Bresle Patch to a dry and clean test surface.
3. Measure a given amount of distilled water into a measuring tube or beaker, clean the
syringe using this water.
4. Using a conductivity meter, measure the electrical conductivity of the distilled water in
the measuring tube.
5. Using the water in the measuring tube or beaker, inject a given amount into the
Bresle Patch which is adhered to the test surface.
6. Pump the water back and forth between the syringe and the patch, to dissolve the
soluble salts on the test surface.
7. Remove all the distilled water from the patch using the syringe and return it to the
measuring tube or beaker then re-measure the electrical conductivity of the water

Electrical conductivity of distilled water is 4 µS/cm and extracted water soluble
conductivity reading is 20 µS/cm. Thus, ionic concentration of total salts is 16 µS/cm (or
equals to 19 mg/m2). Note: conversion factor from µS/cm to mg/m2 is multiplication by
a factor of 1.2
Conductivity of distilled water Conductivity of extracted water soluble

4 µS/cm 20 µS/cm
CUEL Limited
C PT A PPE ND IX I

The maximum content of soluble impurities on the blasted surface as sampled using ISO
8502-6 shall not exceed or at least corresponding to a NaCl content of 20 mg/m2.
CONCLUSION

CUEL Limited
C PT A PPE ND IX I
RECORD : 12
TEST METHOD : SURFACE PROFILE BY TESTEX REPLICA TAPE
PURPOSE
Determines the profile (average peak-to-valley depth) of blasted steel surfaces as been
described by ASTM D 4417-C / ISO 8502-5 and NACE RP0287. Replica Tape method is
preferred to use, because it is easy to conduct, accurate, and produces a permanent
record.
APPARATUS
ELCOMETER 122 TESTEX REPLICA TAPE
ELCOMETER 124 MICROMETER
PROCEDURE
1. The tape consists of a layer of deformable plastic foam bonded to a Mylar backing.
2. The tape is rubbed onto the blast-cleaned surface with a plastic swizzle stick to
produce a reverse replicate of the profile.
3. The tape profile is then measured with a spring micrometer
4. The micrometer can be set to automatically subtract the two-mil (50 µm) thickness of
the non-deformable Mylar backing.

Surface profile of the prepared test panel is 82 µm.

Size of abrasive particles for blast cleaning shall be capable to produce surface profile
height (anchor pattern profile) of 50 – 85 microns. This surface profile shall be measured
in accordance with ISO 8503.
CONCLUSION

CUEL Limited
C PT A PPE ND IX I
RECORD : 13
TEST METHOD : MIXING AND AGITATING OF THE TWO-COMPONENT EPOXY
STANDARD : SSPC-PA1
PURPOSE
This procedure describes the proper mixing of part A and B in order to verify that the
proper coating components and ratio are mixed accordingly.
APPARATUS
PNEUMATIC AGITATOR
Mixing of 1st coat Mixing of 2nd coat

PROCEDURE
When mixing multi-component coatings, it is important that materials are mixed in the
correct ratio. Manufacturer's instructions should be followed with respect to induction
period of pot-life requirements. Two-component coating must be mixed in the correct
proportions and in the manner specified by the supplier to achieve optimum film
properties. They are normally mixed as follows:
1. Stir the base component (Package A) with a clean paddle to disperse pigment lumps
that may have settled (five minutes is usually adequate).
2. While continuing to stir, slowly add all of Package B (sometimes called the catalyst, co
reactant, or curing agent), which is frequently unpigmented (the mixing container must
be large enough to hold both components).
3. Agitate the two mixed components with a power stirrer until a smooth consistency is
achieved.
4. Any mixed material remaining after the job is completed should be properly disposed.

Part A & B is mixed accurately in an appropriate manner as per mixing ratio stated in
product technical data sheet.

Mixing, mix ratio, thinning, working pot life, drying and curing time, coating interval
time, and method of application should be in accordance with the material’s technical
data
CONCLUSION

CUEL Limited
C PT A PPE ND IX I
RECORD : 14
TEST METHOD : STRIPE COAT
STANDARD : SSPC-PA1
PURPOSE
This procedure describes the process of stripe coating before the steel receives its first
full prime coat of coating. Stripe coating of edges, corners, rivets, welds, etc., is
advantageous in preventing breakdown of coating on such edges in very corrosive
surroundings.
APPARATUS
BRUSH
on 1st coat on 2nd coat
PROCEDURE
1. All corners, crevices, welds, and sharp edges shall be stripe coated with the priming
coating before the steel receives its first full prime coat of coating.
2. Such striping shall extend a minimum of one inch (2 cm) from the edge. The stripe
coat shall set to touch before the full prime coat is applied.
3. The stripe coat shall not be permitted to dry for a period long enough to allow rusting
of the unprimed steel.

Stripe coating is done in an appropriate manner to all welds, corners, behind angles,
edges and areas that are not fully reachable by spray.

For each coat, a stripe coat shall be applied by brush to all welds, corners, behind
angles, edges of beams etc. and areas not fully reachable by spray in order to obtain the
specified coverage and thickness.
CONCLUSION

CUEL Limited
C PT A PPE ND IX I
RECORD : 15
TEST METHOD : WET FILM THICKNESS MEASUREMENT
STANDARD : ASTM D4414A
PURPOSE
This procedure describes the wet film thickness (WFT) measurements that were made
immediately after paint application to determine if the coating applied is sufficiently thick
enough to obtain the desired dry film thickness (DFT).
APPARATUS
WET FILM THICKNESS GAUGE
(FOUR-SIDES & STAINLESS STEEL)
on 1st coat on 2nd coat

PROCEDURE
1. To conduct the measurement, the face is pressed firmly and squarely into the wet
paint immediately after its application.
2. The face is then carefully removed and examined visually. The WFT is the highest
scale reading of the notches with paint adhering to it.
3. Measurements should be made in triplicate. Faces of gauges should be kept clean by
removing the wet paint immediately after each measurement.

Wet film thickness is measured for each coating applied in an appropriate manner.

Wet film thickness should be measured for each coating applied in order to make sure
the nominal dry film thickness will be achieved.
CONCLUSION

CUEL Limited
C PT A PPE ND IX I
RECORD : 16
TEST METHOD : DRY FILM THICKNESS MEASUREMENT
STANDARD : SSPC-PA2 / ISO 19840
PURPOSE
This procedure describes the method to determine if specified thicknesses have been
met.
APPARATUS
DRY FILM THICKNESS GAUGE
(ELECTROMAGNETIC ELCOMETER 456)
PROCEDURE
1. All magnetic thickness gauges should be calibrated
before use. It is good practice to check the calibration
during and after use. Calibrate the gage according to
manufacturer’s instructions. Example of Gage Reading
2. Make five (5) separate spot measurements (average of the gage readings, see above
picture) spaced randomly over each 10 m2 area to be measured. The five spot
measurements shall be made for each 10 m2 of area as follows:
2.1 For structures not exceeding 30 m2 in area, each 10 m2 area shall be measured.
2.2 For structures not exceeding 100 m2 in area, three 10 m2 areas shall be
randomly selected and measured.
2.3 For structures exceeding 100 m2 in area, the first 100 m2 shall be measured as
stated in point 2.2 above and for each additional 100 m2 of area or increment
thereof, one 10 m2 area shall be randomly selected and measured.
3. Average of 5 spot measurements to be within specified range of DFT. No single spot
measurement shall be less than 80% of the specified min. DFT and more than 120% of
the specified max. DFT.
1st coat Total DFT 2nd coat

(1) (2) (2-1)
Ave. Spot A 242 625 383
Ave. Spot B 244 597 353
Ave. Spot C 246 560 314
Ave. Spot D 270 548 278
Ave. Spot E 244 467 223
Total Average 249 559 310
*measurement in microns

DFT should be in accordance with the manufacturer’s technical data sheet
CUEL Project Specific Procedural Instruction ALL0701V-CON-Q-SPI-0002:

Each coat DFT min. 225 microns and Total DFT min. 450 microns
CUEL Limited
C PT A PPE ND IX I
Manufacturer’s technical data sheet (see Interzone 954, page 3 of 4, product

characteristics):
For use in atmospheric service, a minimum dry film thickness of 350 microns is required
in one coat when applied direct to steel. For water immersion, a minimum of 450
microns dry film thickness is recommended, however, Interzone 954 can also be used as
a non-skid deck system, typical thickness will be between 500 – 1000 microns.
Other information:
Type of spray equipment used : Hasco 63:1
Tip size : 319
Input pressure to airless pump : 70 psi
Atomizing pressure : 4410 psi
% Thinner added : no thinning
CONCLUSION
No single spot measurement less than 80% of the specified thickness. Even some spot
measurements observed for the 2nd coat are greater than 120% of the specified
thickness, however, this kind of material, Interzone 954, can be applied up to 1000
microns. Thus, the thickness of test panel still satisfies to the requirements of Norsok
M501.

CUEL Limited
C PT A PPE ND IX I
RECORD : 17
TEST METHOD : FINAL COATING SURFACE CONDITION
STANDARD : SSPC-PA1
PURPOSE
This describes the procedure for identifying improper application and coating defects
such as runs, sags, drip, skip, blister, dry spray, and over spray.
APPARATUS
VISUAL OBSERVATION
PROCEDURE
1. During application, observe all surfaces to check for
any improper application defect such as runs, sags, drips,
blister, dry spray, and over spray
2. If found, the identified coating defect should be
corrected at the time they are produced.

No application defect, except, orange-peel was observed around the pipes.

Each coat shall be applied uniformly over the entire surface. Skips, runs, sags and drips
shall be avoided. Each coat shall be free from pinholes, blisters and holidays.
CONCLUSION

CUEL Limited
C PT A PPE ND IX I
RECORD : 18
TEST METHOD : HOLIDAY (DISCONTINUITY)
STANDARD : NACE RP0188
PURPOSE
Newly coated structures on which the coating integrity is important (particularly linings
or coatings in immersion conditions) should be tested with a holiday detector to ensure
coating film continuity. A holiday (sometimes called discontinuity) is a pinhole or other
break in the film that permits the passage of moisture to the substrate. This allows
substrate deterioration to begin. Holidays are not easily detected visually, and must be
located with electrical instruments called holiday detector.
APPARATUS
ELCOMETER 236 DC HOLIDAY DETECTOR
PROCEDURE
1. Place the probe on the test surface. Keep the probe in contact with the surface and
move it over the work area at a speed of approximately one meter every four seconds,
0.25 m/s (10"/s).
2. The presence of one or more of the following indicates that there is a flaw in the
coating:
• A spark between the probe and the surface
• ALARM flashes
• The audible alarm sounds
• The output voltage, indicated on the LCD display, drops substantially
• The probe neon indicator glows
3. The probe should always touch the surface. Gaps between the probe and the coating
can result in genuine flaws not being detected.

CPT test panel is totally free from holiday (negative) at 2.5 kV. (Note: for a coating
thickness of 500 µm, NACE RP0188 recommended to use 2.5 kV or 2500 V, see following
table, depicted in aforementioned standard page 04).
CUEL Limited
C PT A PPE ND IX I
Holiday detection on CPT test panel Selecting voltage before instrument being used

Each coat shall be applied uniformly over the entire surface and should be free from
holidays. After the coating cures, holiday test in accordance with NACE-RP0188 shall be
done to trace for any discontinuity.
CONCLUSION

CUEL Limited
C PT A PPE ND IX I
RECORD : 19
TEST METHOD : PULL-OFF ADHESION
STANDARD : ISO 4624 / ASTM D4541
PURPOSE
To measure the bond strength of applied coatings since adhesion is the key requirement
in a corrosion resistant coating. Irrespective of most of its other properties, the coating
with strong adhesion to the surface will retain its integrity much longer than the one with
less adhesion with other strong characteristics.
APPARATUS
ELCOMETER 106 ADHESION TESTER
ARALDITE GLUE PER STANDARD SPECIFICATION
PROCEDURE
1. The surface of the dolly and the test area should be abraded and be free from oil,
moisture and dust to ensure a good bond between the dolly face and the coating.
2. Prepare the surface of the dolly and the coating where the dolly is to be applied by
roughening with an abrasive paper. Then de-grease these areas by using a suitable
solvent to clean both surfaces.
3. Mix a small quantity of adhesive and apply an even film to the prepared surface of the
dolly. Place the dolly onto the prepared test surface and apply pressure to squeeze out
excess adhesive which should then be removed. Allow the adhesive to cure for the
recommended time
4. After adhesive cures for a certain agreed period, cut around the base of the dolly very
carefully using the dolly cutter. This is only necessary when lateral bonding in the
coating is greater than adhesion, for example, elastomeric coatings.
5. Place the base support ring over the dolly ensuring that it lies flat on the surface.
Slacken the handwheel or nut on the Adhesion Tester. Set the dragging indicator to zero
(0) on the scale and engage the claw carefully with the dolly.
6. Hold the Adhesion Tester steady with one hand to prevent rotation and tighten the
handwheel or nut slowly and evenly to apply an increasing force to the dolly and hence
to the coating.
7. Continue until the coating fails and the dolly is removed from the surface, or until the
specified test force is indicated. The pull-off force is read from the position of the
dragging indicator after the test is complete.
8. Immediately after the test is complete and the pull-off force has been recorded,
slacken the handwheel or nut to remove all the force from the unit.
9. To record the result, first inspect the face of the dolly. In most cases the coating will
fully adhere to the dolly and the test can be claimed as 100% valid. In some cases, the
coating will cover only part of the area of the dolly and a partial adhesion failure should
be recorded.
10. If no coating is present on the dolly this must be recorded as a failure of the
adhesive (or glue). This is normally due to incorrect or insufficient mixing of the
component parts of the adhesive, or incompatibility of the adhesive and the coating.
11. Observing the test area will give additional information about the type of failure;
adhesion and cohesion between different layers of the coating.
CUEL Limited
C PT A PPE ND IX I
Location Actual DFT Actual DFT Actual Pull- Type of Failure

(microns) (microns) Off Strength
Before After (MPa)
Pull-Off Pull-Off
Dolly A 549 279 9
30% Glue
70% Slightly Cohesion
on 2nd coat
Dolly B 470 326 10

100% Glue
Dolly C 562 316 7

20% Glue
on 2nd coat
Dolly D 477 252 9

40% Glue
on 2nd coat
Dolly E 466 453 10

30% Glue
on 2nd coat
Average 504 325 9
Application of 2nd coat: 19Aug07 at 10.00

Curing Time Required by Manufacturer: at least 5 days at 400C
Pull-off Date: 22Aug07 10.00 (only 3 days or 72 hours after 2nd coat application)
Overall Interpretation: The slight cohesion failure was mainly due to improper curing time
(min. days required by 5 days, but pull-off was done only after 3 days from 2nd coat),
however, basically the tensile strength of the coating system has shown excellent bonding
(almost twice from the specified bonding strength required by the owner representative).
CUEL Limited
C PT A PPE ND IX I
PLACING THE DOLLIES

Date Time Air Temp Steel Temp Dew Point Relative
0 0 0
C C C Humidity
21 August 07 15:00 37 35 27 56
TESTING THE DOLLIES

Date Time Air Temp Steel Temp Dew Point Relative
0 0 0
C C C Humidity
22 August 07 10:00 30 29 23 63

Pull-off adhesion test shall be performed in accordance with ISO 4624 and must meet
the minimum adhesion of 5.0 MPa.
Other Information:
COATING SYSTEM
Product Ave. Mixing Recoating Interval Full Batch Number
Name DFT Ratio by at 400C Cure
(µm) Volume Min Max (days) Part A Part B
Interzone 954 249 4:1 3 hours 5 days 5 EAXN35 EAA964
(Gray)
Interzone 954 310 4:1 3 hours 5 days 5 EAG135 EAA964
(Yellow)
CUEL Limited
C PT A PPE ND IX I
APPLICATION CONDITION
Product Date Time Actual Air Steel Dew Relative
Name DFT Temp Temp Point Humidity
0 0 0
(µm) C C C %
Interzone 954 18Aug 16.25 249 37 35 27 56
(Gray) 2007
Interzone 954 19Aug 10.30 310 35 32 27 61
(Yellow) 2007
CONCLUSION

Certificate No. 81/WHW/INT/07
This is to certify that
MR. KONG PAKDEELON

of
DEBORAH SERVICES (THAILAND) LTD
has attended the course
BLASTING AND PAINTING OPERATION
and based on his skill, knowledge, and experience

he is competent for the qualification of
BP3 – MASTER CRAFTSMAN
BP3: Blaster/Painter who has been qualified to do external and internal painting
application, include special application on various materials and surfaces and will be
considered as Master Craftsman.
application, but not authorized to undertake special application on various materials and
surfaces other than paints and steel, and will be considered as Craftsman.
BP1: Blaster/Painter who has been qualified to do external painting application but not
authorized to do lining and special application on various materials and surfaces other than
paints and steel, and will be considered as Apprentice.
Conducted at: DSL Laemchabang Yard, Chonburi Thailand
Issued on August 24th, 2007

by WHW Consulting Services
ALEXANDER WIJAYA
MR. SOMKIAT SALEEWONG

of


ALEXANDER WIJAYA
MR. SUPHACHAI ANAKA

of


ALEXANDER WIJAYA
MR. SALAVOOT LAPHAPHAN

of

BP1 – APPRENTICE

ALEXANDER WIJAYA
MR. SIRIWICHAI PAMANET

of

BP2 – CRAFTSMAN

ALEXANDER WIJAYA
MR. PICHAI KAEWWANNA

of

BP2 – CRAFTSMAN

ALEXANDER WIJAYA
MR. PRASART WANTOE

of


ALEXANDER WIJAYA
MR. KRIANGKAI SRIDAJITR

of

BP2 – CRAFTSMAN

ALEXANDER WIJAYA
MR. BOONJAN SRIHARAT

of

BP2 – CRAFTSMAN

ALEXANDER WIJAYA
MR. SUPIN PHOTISON

of

BP2 – CRAFTSMAN

ALEXANDER WIJAYA
MR. PRASONG ARSAR

of

BP2 – CRAFTSMAN

ALEXANDER WIJAYA
MR. KHAMPA SRIDAPHAN

of

BP2 – CRAFTSMAN

ALEXANDER WIJAYA
MR. MUNGKORN KAEWJANLAH

of

BP2 – CRAFTSMAN

ALEXANDER WIJAYA
MR. THONGCHAI PRADU

of


ALEXANDER WIJAYA
MR. YUTHAKARN KENPROM

of

BP2 – CRAFTSMAN

ALEXANDER WIJAYA
MR. VEERA YEESAWAT

of

BP2 – CRAFTSMAN

ALEXANDER WIJAYA
MR. SAK BUATIB

of

BP2 – CRAFTSMAN

ALEXANDER WIJAYA
MR. ARTIT SUWANDEE

of

BP2 – CRAFTSMAN

ALEXANDER WIJAYA
MR. VEERACHAI KONWIMOL

of

BP2 – CRAFTSMAN

ALEXANDER WIJAYA
MR. JANSRI PRASARNTONG

of

BP1 – APPRENTICE

ALEXANDER WIJAYA
MR. JAN KUSOL

of

BP2 – CRAFTSMAN

ALEXANDER WIJAYA
MR. PITTAYA SAENSRADEE

of

BP2 – CRAFTSMAN

ALEXANDER WIJAYA
MR. SARN SAENBUDDEE

of

BP2 – CRAFTSMAN

ALEXANDER WIJAYA
MR. BOOHAING MANORAT

of

BP2 – CRAFTSMAN

ALEXANDER WIJAYA
MR. KHAMPHAN ROMKLA

of

BP2 – CRAFTSMAN

ALEXANDER WIJAYA
MR. HIAW DUANGKET

of

BP1 – APPRENTICE

ALEXANDER WIJAYA
MR. KHAMRAK DASAR

of


ALEXANDER WIJAYA
MR. VEERA SRINOI

of

BP2 – CRAFTSMAN

ALEXANDER WIJAYA
MR. CHARIN MANORAT

of

BP2 – CRAFTSMAN

ALEXANDER WIJAYA
MR. MANAS BOONTANEE

of

BP2 – CRAFTSMAN

ALEXANDER WIJAYA
MR. DECHNARONG KAEWCHANA

of

BP2 – CRAFTSMAN

ALEXANDER WIJAYA
MR. SUTEEP TAEMSRI

of

BP1 – APPRENTICE

ALEXANDER WIJAYA
MR. PRAJAK PROMKASIKORN

of

BP2 – CRAFTSMAN

ALEXANDER WIJAYA
MR. BOONLOM KHAMMONGKUL

of

BP1 – APPRENTICE

ALEXANDER WIJAYA
MR. MANOI SABAI

of

BP2 – CRAFTSMAN

ALEXANDER WIJAYA
MR. SUCHART SOMPONG

of

BP2 – CRAFTSMAN

ALEXANDER WIJAYA
MR. PAISARN KULMUANGKON

of


ALEXANDER WIJAYA
MR. SOOKSANTI SRIPRATOOM

of

BP1 – APPRENTICE

ALEXANDER WIJAYA
MR. PRAWAN JANSOOK

of

BP1 – APPRENTICE

ALEXANDER WIJAYA
MR. SIRI MUSIKAWAN

of

BP2 - CRAFTSMAN

ALEXANDER WIJAYA
MR. KHAMLEE BARLEE

of

BP2 - CRAFTSMAN

ALEXANDER WIJAYA
MR. CHUTTIMUN NAKARUNGSU

of

BP2 - CRAFTSMAN

ALEXANDER WIJAYA
MR. TONGPOON BUMRUNG

of

BP2 - CRAFTSMAN

ALEXANDER WIJAYA
MR. PRASIT MUSIKAWAN

of

BP1 – APPRENTICE

ALEXANDER WIJAYA
MR. NIKOM KAEWMOOK

of

BP2 - CRAFTSMAN

ALEXANDER WIJAYA
MR. SOONTORN THANORMPONG

of

BP2 - CRAFTSMAN

ALEXANDER WIJAYA
MR. SARKORN AMNAUY

of

BP1 – APPRENTICE

ALEXANDER WIJAYA
MR. CHAIRAT UNSAMAI

of


ALEXANDER WIJAYA
MR. SUPHAP LAPHAPHAN

ID – 3 3407 00968 90 5
of
COATING INTEGRATED MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS

BASED ON ISO 12944, ISO 9001, ISO 14001,
AND OHSAS 18001
and therefore, he is eligible to conduct internal and

second party audit related to coating management

ALEXANDER WIJAYA
NACE Certified Coating Inspector #9683
NACE Certified Corrosion Technologist #8984
ISO 9001, ISO 14001 Certified Lead Auditor
OHSAS 18001 Certified Auditor
MR. APICHART SINGSAEN
of
BASIC QUALITY CONTROL

COATING INSPECTION


ALEXANDER WIJAYA
MR. SOMBAT PRASANSAK
of

COATING INSPECTION


ALEXANDER WIJAYA
MR. THANAKIT ROILA
of

COATING INSPECTION


ALEXANDER WIJAYA
MR. SANGTONG LAPHAPHAN
of

COATING INSPECTION


ALEXANDER WIJAYA
MR. SOMKIAT SALEEWONG
of

COATING INSPECTION


ALEXANDER WIJAYA
MR. SUPHACHAI ANAKA
of

COATING INSPECTION


ALEXANDER WIJAYA
MR. PRASART WANTOE
of

COATING INSPECTION


ALEXANDER WIJAYA
MR. CHAIMONGKOL SRIDAJITR
of

COATING INSPECTION


ALEXANDER WIJAYA
MR. CHAIRAT UNSMAI
of

COATING INSPECTION


ALEXANDER WIJAYA
MR. SALAWUT LAPHAPHAN
of

COATING INSPECTION


ALEXANDER WIJAYA
MR. SURACHET SALEEWONG
of

COATING INSPECTION


ALEXANDER WIJAYA
MR. NOPPADOL KAEWNOR
of

COATING INSPECTION


ALEXANDER WIJAYA
MR. SARKORN AMNAUY
of

COATING INSPECTION


ALEXANDER WIJAYA
MR. JIRAPAT PRATOOMTONG
of

COATING INSPECTION


ALEXANDER WIJAYA
MR. ANEK POOKSAI
of

COATING INSPECTION


ALEXANDER WIJAYA

Cuel CPT Report

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Cuel CPT Report

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Cuel CPT Report

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

By: Alexander Wijaya

CUEL Limited Date: 23rd August 2007

PLETs and SSIVs Fabrication Project

COATING PROCEDURE TEST (CPT)

Originated by Reviewed by Approved by

ALEXANDER WIJAYA ALLSEAS BECHTEL FRANCE

2.1 Main References

NORSOK M-501 Surface Preparation and Protective Coatings

2.2 CPT Standard Practices

ASTM E337 Standard test method for measuring humidity with a

ISO 11125-2 Preparation of steel substrates before application of

2.3 Personnel Assessment Standards

ASTM D4228 Standard practice for qualification of coating

3. TEST PANEL AND COATING MATERIALS

3.1 Test Panel

A test panel with size of 1m x 1m and containing of 2 pipe-ends from two

Test Panel: Before fabrication Test Panel: After fabrication

3.2 Coating Materials

The primer is gray in color.

The top coat is yellow in

4.1 Equipment protection and clean up

4.2 Ambient conditions

4.3 Coating materials

4.4 Steel material

Steel subject to surface preparation on site shall as a minimum requirement be in

4.5 Pre-blasting preparation

Sharp edges, fillets, corners and welds shall be rounded or smoothened by

Any oil and grease contamination shall be removed in accordance with

Any major surface defects, particularly surface laminations or scabs detrimental

4.6 Blast cleaning

The maximum content of soluble impurities on the blasted surface as sampled

4.7 Paint application

Dry film thickness instrument to be used shall be of electromagnetic gage

4.8 Testing of application quality

4.9 Test panel results

4.10 Health, safety, and environment

5. COATING PROCEDURE TEST

5.1 Pre-qualification of coating materials

Surface Pre-Inspection: Environmental Tests:

• Check Relative Humidity

Surface Cleaning Method:

5.2 Qualification of Personnel

The method employed in assessing qualification of paint operators consist of

• BP3 : Blaster/Painter who has been qualified to do external and internal

6. RESULT & FINDING OF CPT

6.1 Procedure, Inspection and Testing

Procedure, Method Standard Acceptance Result* Remark

6.2 Coating Personnel Assessment and Qualification

No Name of Personnel Skill Knowledge Qualified Remark

Assessment of Personnel Qualification (August 20 – 21, 2007)

Training to Coating Personnel

FINDING AND ACCEPTANCE/REJECTION

Aug.18 Aug.18 Aug.19 Acceptance

Conducted by Approved by Witnessed by Witnessed by

Jarun Khemthong Alexander Wijaya

FINDING AND ACCEPTANCE/REJECTION

Norsok M501 Acceptance Criteria:

Conducted by Approved by Witnessed by Witnessed by