Project of Cost Managment 2
Project of Cost Managment 2
Project of Cost Managment 2
INTRODUCTION
Siyanbola and Raji (2013) posited that cost and profit in business determines its
financial position. An increase in turnover expands production capacity (cost), this
demand effective cost management. Innes et al. (2010) discovered product/service
cost, quality and performance managements as surviving triplet for any company
today. Customers continuously demand for high quality products/services and
better performance, at a low price. Likewise, shareholders demanding for high
return on their investment. Nevertheless, cost has become the determinant to
performance and the challenge is being able to manufacture products or provide
services within the acceptable cost framework.
Cost management often refers to cost cutting and it's commonly approached that
firm managers use to respond to the decreasing sustainable profitability (Anderson,
2007). The most important managerial tools are cost management strategies
(Zengin and Ada, 2010), and cost management strategies are considered as critical
factors to increase revenue for the success of manufacturing companies (Kumar
and Shafabi, 2011).
The rising cost of doing business in the country has been of utmost concern to
business men and the entire citizens. This has even accounted for capital flight,
closure of businesses and the movement of manufacturing companies to
neighbouring countries, where cost of doing business is relatively low compared to
what is happening in Nigeria. The use of effective cost management system is
needed to arrest the situation. This study therefore tends to examine the impact of
cost management in manufacturing industries with particular referenceEmenite
Limited, Enugu.
The broad objective of this study is to examine the impact of cost management in
manufacturing industries (a study of Emenite Limited, Enugu). The specific
objectives are:
ii. To know the need for cost management to Emenite Limited, Enugu
ii. What is the need for cost management to Emenite Limited, Enugu?
This research work can be of great help to those who have a little or no knowledge
in manufacturing business. It will be valuable to people who are interested in the
manufacturing business and wish to make it their career.
The research work can help the Manufacturing Company to improve in areas
where it is needed in their cost management operations so as to boost their
profitability and consequently increase their shareholders wealth, and to assist the
organizations to maximize their profits and reduce their risk of liquidity.
Indeed, this will in no little way have effects on the national growth and
development of Nigeria manufacturing sector and economy at large. Customers’
goodwill towards the organization will be maintained as it enables delivery
committed to be met all the time.
This work will be of immense benefit and use to the future researches as reference
document and will provide a base for other research works that might be carried
out on cost management in any other sector.
In conducting this research work, the researcher encountered some difficulties such
as the following:
Cost: It is the amount of resources put into the production of goods and or service.
It's often expressed in monetary terms and is also' seen as the expenditure resulting
from providing goods and services.
2.1.1 Cost
One major issue that most organizations have to deal with regularly is that of cost.
This arises as a result of the need to rightly value company assets and liabilities as
well as products and services in order to maximize profit. Weetman (2010) defined
a cost as an amount of expenditure on a defined activity. It is the amounts of
resources given up, expressed in monetary terms, in order to receive a good or
services. Cost provides a basis for costing, which is the process of ascertaining cost
(Weetman, 2010). Cost is regarded as an important factor in the operational
processes of every organization for several reasons. Mohd, Muammar and Ainatul
(2014) observed that cost is essential not only to fix price but also to ascertain the
margin of profit. According to Xu and Zia (2012), cost accounting is the process of
determining and accumulating the cost of product or activity. It is a process of
accounting for the incurrence and the control of cost. Sheikh (2018) added that it
also covers classification, analysis, and interpretation of cost. As an internal aspect
of the organization, cost accounting is accounting for cost aimed at providing cost
data, statement and reports for the purpose of managerial decision making (Mohd,
et al., 2014).
Kinney and Raiborn (2011) and ICAI (2013) defined a cost control system as set of
formal and informal tools and methods designed to manage and regulate
organizational costs. Cost control relies heavily on the existence of a sound and
effective cost control system and cost reduction also operates effectively where
there is an efficient cost control system (Kinney and Raiborn, 2011).
According to Kinney and Raiborn (2011), cost control system provides information
for planning and control from the point activities are being planned until after they
are performed. It mainly focuses on information found within the organization and
contains the detector, assessor, effector, and network components. Control system
is part of management cycle which starts with planning as operational targets and
objectives are established without which control cannot be achieved. The planning
phase launches performance goals that become the inputs to the control phase as
shown in the diagram below thus setting up an effective Cost Control System
(Kinney and Raiborn, 2011).
Clement (2015) disclosed two aspects of an effective cost control system which
involves; operational control and accounting control. Operational control is mainly
done in small businesses, by which the manager control costs through personal
observation and close supervision of operations. As the business grows personal
control is delegated to the lower level. As the business continues to grow,
operational control is supplemented by accounting control as such control will no
longer be relied upon to keep waste, idleness, inefficiencies and other cost.
Accounting control, this requires creating a system of records which analyze costs,
account for them and supply current pertinent reports to reveal how those who are
responsible for are discharging their responsibilities (Clement, 2015).
According to Kinney and Raiborn (2011), a sound control system is formed on the
back of strong cost consciousness. Cost consciousness is a companywide employee
attitude toward topics essential for a specific stage of cost control and these include
understanding cost changes, cost containment, cost avoidance, and cost
reduction .Cost control involves a companywide involvement, as managers alone
cannot control costs (Kinney and Raiborn,2011).
According to Zengin and Ada (2010), the most important managerial tools are cost
management strategies and cost management strategies are considered as critical
factors to increase revenue for the success of manufacturing companies. Cost
management strategy supports decision making and improves competitive
advantage that results in a better resource allocation (Ellram and Stanley, 2008). In
addition, cost management may be an integral feature of overall businesses'
management effectiveness and facilitate to determine accurately estimated cost
before process starting and can help to forecast cost occurrence in the future. Cost
management strategy effectiveness helps to finish the task with the spending of
limited allocated resources and makes valuable to firms such as working capital
invested reduction, lower cost per unit, and better quality of the process and
product (Groth and Kinney, 1994). Limited resource and apparent continuous
competition influence firms to better managing cost of production by
implementing standard costing, budget system, monitoring cost information, and
focusing on value added activities by eliminating non-value added activities
through supplier coordination, and emphasizing on cost structure by analysing cost
and finding the way to reduce costs in the stage of pre-production. Firms with cost
management strategy implementation are able to know when the amount of cost
they will incur in the future if they have current and future cost information. Thus,
managers can make better decision which will positively improve the financial
performance of manufacturing companies.
a. Cost understanding
Cost control cannot be achieved without understanding why costs differ between
periods or from the budgeted amounts. It begins when the budget is prepared and
preparation of budgets cannot be done without understanding the reasons causing
changes in cost from period to period. Cost can change due to changes in volumes
as with variable costs and a flexible budget can compensate for such changes, costs
also change due to inflation, supplier costs adjustments and others change due to
quantity purchased as quantity discounts. Understanding such changes helps in
controlling costs (Kinney and Raiborn, 2011).
b. Cost containment
d. Cost reduction
According to Kinney and Raiborn (2011), cost reduction is closely related to cost
avoidance. The intent of cost avoidance and cost reduction is to lower total costs.
Cost reduction can be implemented at the designed stage to ensure that high costs
are not carried through the life cycle of the product. The process of costs reduction
is then extended to the production level as new opportunities to reduce costs arise.
The elimination of wastes and non-value adding activities during production aids
to costs reduction (Kinney and Raiborn, 2011).
Kinney and Raiborn (2011) revealed a five step method of implementing a cost
control system that management can adopt to create an environment that conducive
to control and successfully manage its costs. The five step method for managers
involve the following:
Kinney and Raiborn (2011) suggested that, understanding the type of cost incurred
by an organization is very important, are the costs under consideration fixed or
variable, product or period? What are the drivers of those costs? From who were
purchases made? When were purchases made? This is, generically, sometimes
referred to as “spend analysis. Jim (2015) supported this by saying that for any
organization to implement an effective cost management system, it must first
identify exactly where its revenue comes from and it must identify specific costs
incurred to produce its revenue stream. Finally it must identify overhead costs and
costs not directly linked to revenue generation (Jim, 2015).
Kinney and Raiborn (2011), suggested that there is need to communicate the need
for cost consciousness environment to all employees and there must be aware of
which costs need to be better controlled and why cost control is important to both
themselves and the company.
Kinney and Raiborn (2011), employees should be educated in cost control issues
and they must be encouraged to suggest ways to control costs, and motivated to
embrace cost control concepts. Incentives can range from simple verbal
recognition to monetary rewards to time off with pay. Managers must also be
flexible enough to allow for changes from the current method of operation (Kinney
and Raiborn, 2011).
Kinney and Raiborn (2011) suggested that there is need for management to
generate reports that indicate actual results, comparing budgets to actuals, and
calculating variances. Management must evaluate these costs to determine why
costs were or were not controlled in the past. Such analysis can provide insight
about cost drivers so that activities driving costs can be better controlled in the
future (Kinney and Raiborn, 2011).
Kinney and Raiborn (2011) suggested that management should develop a view that
the cost control system is a long run- run process, not a short run solution. Cost
decisions should be measured against the company's strategy, rather than a current
short-term situation. A company should not buy an excessive amount of inventory
because the manufacturer has lowered the price to get rid of it. The company
should be buying the amount it needs to satisfy its customers (Kinney and Raiborn,
2011). Cost management must become standard operating procedure. Management
and employees must be constantly identifying opportunities for eliminating or
reducing unprofitable work (Jim, 2015).
Idowu (2014) revealed costing techniques that have been proposed for gaining a
competitive advantage in cost control. These techniques, though separately
described, they are interrelated and they include target costing, value engineering,
kaizen costing and life cycle costing.
a. Target Costing
ICAI (2013) suggested that target costing can be used as a cost management tool. It
is a customer-oriented approached widely used by Japanese companies. It is
defined as a structured approach to determining the cost at which a proposed
product with specified functionality and quality must be produced, to generate a
desired level of profitability at its anticipated selling price (ICAI, 2013).
According to ACCA (2013) the following steps highlighted below are involved in
the implementation:
Set a selling price at which the organization will be able to achieve a desired
market share.
Compile an estimated cost for the product based on the anticipated design
specification and current cost levels.
b. Value Engineering
Mahadik (2015) said that the concept of value engineering is mutually exclusive
with that of Target costing. Value engineering is an extension of Target costing
throughout the design stage up until the point when the new product goes into
production. Mahadik (2015) findings from the research study carried out on Value
Engineering for Cost Reduction and Sustainability in Construction Projects
revealed that, using value engineering as a cost reduction technique, value and
economy are improved through the study of alternative designs concepts. Thus
value engineering assures best costs and value is obtained over the life cycle of a
service (Mahadik, 2015).
c. Kaizen Costing
Drury (2000) revealed that kaizen costing purpose is to cut down the total cost of
the production process, namely costs are reduced by eliminating digressive
leanness from the production process. Non-value adding activities and costs are
avoided and thus wastages are prevented to ensure that the business attains its
objectives. Kaizen is „the Japanese term for making improvements to a process
through small incremental amounts, rather than large innovations‟ (Drury, 2000).
Bekciogluet al. (2016) adjudged that, after establishing, implementing the product
and process designing, the planning team focus on the development and
operational character of the process. Floor workers are involved in production and
they are given a responsibility to improve process and reduce costs. It heavily
relies on employee empowerment, as they are believed to be close to the
manufacturing processes (Bekciogluet al., 2016)
Kaur (2014), argued positively that kaizen costing is a good tool of cost reduction
and it motivate workers as all levels employees are involved during the production
process. It also control the cost of production with the maintenance of existing
performance level (Kaur, 2014).
Bekciogluet al. (2016), however argued against kaizen costing method that, staff
members are subjected to stress during the application of the method and some
organizations prefer to reduce their degree of performance so as to reduce stress
levels of workers. Also, the method results in the organization segmenting its
market, increase in communication costs and pressures to the suppliers. In order to
achieve the continuous cost reduction objectives (Bekciogluet al., 2016).
Bekciogluet al. (2016) defined product life cycle costing as a method used to
inspect all costs caused by activities performed during a product life cycle. The
approach is aimed to foresee all possible costs which may occur at all stages of the
product life cycle and even before it is produced. The approach is used by most
business as it help management and administers to manage costs which go with the
product during the product life cycle (Bekciogluet al., 2016).
Drury (2000) defined life-Cycle costing as a costing technique that tracks and
accumulates costs and revenues attributable to each product over its projected life
that is from inception to its abandonment. „It estimates and accumulates costs over
a product’s entire life-cycle in order to determine whether the profits earned during
the manufacturing phase will cover the costs incurred during pre and
manufacturing stages‟ (Drury, 2000, p. 890).
According to Bekcioglu (2016),product’s life cycle costs are those incurred from
its design stage through development to market launch, production and sales, and
finally to its eventual withdrawal from the market. Such costs therefore include
research and development costs, purchasing costs, training, production costs,
distribution costs, transportation and handling costs, marketing costs, inventory
costs and retirement and disposal costs (Bekciogluet al., 2016).
Emenginiet al. (2014) suggested that, identifying costs incurred at different levels
of the cycle helps in understanding and managing costs the total costs incurred
throughout the life cycle of a product. Life-Cycle costing helps management
understand costs consequences of developing a product and identify areas in which
costs reduction initiatives are likely to be effective. Tracing costs over the
product’s life-cycle also allows management to understand product profitability.
(Emenginiet al., 2014).
Akenbor and Agwor (2015) says that when there is poor cost control, it also means
there is inadequate supervision of workers hence employees can use the resources
of the organization anyhow they like without anyone monitoring them and this
obviously results in wastages of resources. Waste is realized when a comparison is
made between the quantities used to manufacture the products and the quantity
obtained that is the final product that have been manufactured. Waste can be
identified differently,that is normal waste and abnormal waste therefore normal
waste is that which is estimated and budgeted for before production take place and
abnormal waste is that which exceeds the normal loss causing an increase in costs
as it may be due to negligence of employees(Ankenbor and Agwor,2015).
Olalekan and Tajudeen (2015) assert that wastages may result from poor cost
control in that, the firm may buy materials more than what is necessary for
production and those resources will not be utilized. Spoilage produces goods that
cannot be sold at a normal price due to damage, spoilage is also classified as
normal and abnormal. Normal spoilage is the one that is estimated and anticipated
and abnormal exceed the normal and investigations needs to take place if there are
persistent occurrences of abnormal losses. However abnormal wastage and
spoilage is an indication that cost control techniques are weak as the costs will
decrease operational performance (Olalekan and Tajudeen, 2015).
Evans (2014) suggested that repairs and maintenance cost are incurred to bring the
asset in the condition it use to be before and keep it running like it used to. Repair
and maintenance cost can be routine and are already anticipated for but some are
not. Those not estimated for can be because of lack of supervision, negligence by
employees, lack of training and high stockholding levels. Increase in repair and
maintenance costs is an indication that they are weak cost control techniques as
there is need for a planned maintenance (Evans, 2014).
According to Etiet al. (2014), organizations with effective cost control practices
have a wise maintenance culture i.e. they usually incur relatively low repair and
maintenance costs because cost control starts by making a decision of buying
highly –dependable equipment that cost relatively little to maintain .Benefits for
the organization are thereby gained from the reliable long-lived plant which require
lower maintenance costs (Etiet al., 2014).
However, Anjum (2015) argued that they some factors that causes increase in
repairs and maintenance costs, which are not attributed to weaknesses in cost
control techniques and they cannot be controlled by the management. Other factors
include unexpected damages reports of machinery equipment during the
production process, economic fluctuations of spare parts prices and service costs
prices (Anjum, 2015).
Young and Shields (2016) revealed that some increases in labor costs in most
organizations are as a result of poor cost management, in some cases it shows that
cost control techniques implemented by management will have loopholes. Target
set should commensurate with management labor budget otherwise significant
labor variance will arise. Increase in labor cost can result from management trying
to supplement labor variance due to inefficient management contracts ,instead
hired labor may be used which will result in the accrual of additional labor
overheads that lead to over expenditure on the labor budget which will in turn
decrease operational performance (Young and Shields,2016).
However, Wile (2014) argued that there are a number of factors that can cause
labor costs to increase or decrease which cannot be attributed organizational weak
control methods. These costs are borne as the market and other circumstances
dictate and they include the location, efficiency, supply and demand. Location,
where a company is located will impact the company’s labor cost in that
organizations that operate in economically depressed areas often have lower labor
cost than companies located in places where the cost of living is higher and on the
other hand, if the organization seeks skilled employees in area that does not have
an educated workforce, labor costs might higher as there will need to provide
financial incentives to employees for them to relocate (Wile, 2014).
Furthermore, Wile (2014) argued that supply and demand also causes variations in
labor cost as that cannot be regulate by cost control techniques. Supply and
demand comes into play when management sets wages, just as it does when it is
determining the price of a product or service. If there are shortages of workers in
the field that the business will be operating in, it will have to pay relatively high
labor costs. (Wile, 2014)
Akenbor and Agwor (2015) say that the more a firm is careless with cost control
techniques or methods, the more it is inefficient in the use of its resources thus
dragging the performance of the organization. Also, Tunji and Mojeed (2013) said
when there is poor cost control, it also means there is inadequate supervision of
workers hence employees can use the resources of the organization anyhow they
like without anyone monitoring them and this obviously reduces the performance.
Operational performance include the aligning of different strategic business units
(SBU) of the organization and their activities to make sure that the SBUs are
contributing to the achievement of organizational goal and thus, decrease in
operational performance can be as a result of cost control (Evans ,2014).
Abdul and Isiaka (2015), weak cost control techniques have effects on the
performance of a business as it affects its profitability. Profits go a long way to
determine what constitutes the financial position of a firm. Thus cost control
techniques must be effective so that costs will not be allowed to exceed tolerable
levels, otherwise profitability would be affected and where profitability is affected,
expansion and operational performance also becomes difficult. (Abdul and Isiaka,
2015). On the contrary, Chigara et al and Premalalet al.(2015) argued by saying
that cost control has no effect the performance of companies because there are
some other external factors that affect the business which are inflation and
government regulations.
The theory of portfolio management describes the resulting risk and return of a
combination of individual asset. A primary objective of the theory is to identify
asset combinations that are efficient. Here efficiency means the highest expected
rate of return on an investment for a specific level of risk. This simply means that
they will not consider a portfolio with more risk unless it is accompanied by a
higher expected rate of return.
Modern Portfolio theory was largely defined by the work of Markowitz (1952) in a
series of articles published in the late 1950s. This theory was extended and refined
by Tobin (1941) in the subsequent decades. Portfolio theory integrates the process
of efficient portfolio formation to the pricing of individual assets. It explains that
some sources of risk associated with individual assets can be diversified by holding
a proper combination of assets. Prior to Markowitz work, investors focused on
assessing the risks and rewards of individual securities in constructing their
portfolios. Standard investment advice was to identify those securities that offered
the best opportunities for gain with the least risk and then construct a portfolio
from these. Markowitz has detailed the mathematics of diversification and
proposed that investors focus on selecting portfolios based on their overall risk –
reward characteristics instead of merely compiling portfolio from securities that
each individually has attractive risk reward measures.
Pearce and Robinson, (2011) define the resource-based view (RBV) as a method of
analyzingand identifying a firm’s strategic advantages based on examining its
distinct combination ofassets, skills, capabilities and intangibles as an organization.
This theory views the firm-specificfactors and their effect on performance. Grant,
(1991) views the firm as a bundle of resourceswhich are combined to create
organizational capabilities which it can use to earn above averageprofitability.
Firms develop competencies from these resources and when they are
welldeveloped, these become the source of the firm’s competitive advantage.
Tobi et al. (2015) on their study on Costing Techniques and Pricing decisions of
manufacturing companies in Ogun state, concluded that Target costing is more
relevant than other traditional costing techniques in manufacturing companies. It
was considered as useful for pricing decision, for enhancing customer satisfaction
and for making rational and quick decision in manufacturing firms. The study
recommend that target costing could be extended to other sectors of the country’s
economy. The research population study comprised 98 manufacturing companies
in Nigeria and a sample size of 22 selected companies was used.
Siyanbola and Raji (2013) on their study of the impact of cost control on
manufacturing industries profitability. Findings from their research showed that
cost control has a significant and positive impact on profitability of manufacturing
companies in Nigeria. In their research budget was considered as the basic tool for
achieving effective cost control and their study was conducted in West Africa, on
West African Portland Cement Company (WAPCO) and made use of Pearson
correlation for data analysis. Questionnaires were used as research instruments.
Akeem (2017) study on the effect of cost control and cost reduction techniques in
organizational performance, findings revealed that there is a direct relationship
between cost control, reduction and profit. Thus, the study concluded that for an
organization to ensure more profit growth, there is need to control and reduce cost
to an acceptable limit. A descriptive survey research was adopted. Questionnaires
were used as research instruments. Also, Abdul and Isiaka (2015) study on the
relationship between cost management and profitability, a study of selected
manufacturing firms concluded that the relationship between cost management and
profitability is statistically significant. Questionnaires were randomly distributed to
manufacturing companies in Nigeria and data collected were analyzed using
descriptive and non-parametric statistics.
Population means the whole body of items, objects, materials or people that fall
within a geographical location in which the researcher intends to investigate for his
or her study. That is the whole participant of the study. Therefore the target
population for this research includes the staff and workersof Emenite Limited,
Enugu. The population comprises of 62(staff and workers of Emenite Limited,
Enugu).
N
n = 1+ N ¿ ¿
Where,
N= Population (62)
N
n= 1+ N (e) ²
n = 62
1 + 62(0.05)2
n = 62
1 + 0.155
n = 62
1.155
n = 40
The study is based on both primary and secondary data. The primary data involves
the use of questionnaires, oral interview, telephone conservation, observations etc.
The secondary data involves the use of textbooks, journals, magazines, newspaper
etc.
Reliability refers to the stability of the measurement used to study the relationships
between variables.The questions in the questionnaire were designed taking into
consideration the research questions on the subject. Thus the constructed
questionnaire was distributed by the researcher to the group of people different
from the pilot sample group but with the same characteristic, and after sometime
the copies of questionnaire were collected from the respondents and scored them.
Thus, the correct scoring was obtained again and again thereby proving the
reliability of the instrument.
The research instrument for this study which was the questionnaire was self-
administered (person-to-person) by the researcher to 40 respondents. In effect, the
completed copies of the questionnaire were duly collected by the researcher. This
helped to avoid the loss of any copy of the questionnaire. Therefore, the total
number of questionnaire given out was the same retrieved. This method was
considered appropriate because it really enhanced the exercise, as it provided a
platform for the researcher to interact and provide further information about the
study to the respondents within the confines of research.
This refers to the segregation of data into parts with relevant comments and best of
judgments. In other words, it means breaking down and putting in order, the
qualitative information gathered through the research exercise. It also involves
comparing and contrasting the events, patterns and relationships. As earlier stated
in chapter three, the data collected for this study are carefully analyzed in simple
percentage and tables. A total of 40 copies of questionnaire were issued to the
respondents and were completely retrieved.
Male 18 45.0
Female 22 55.0
Total 40 100
Source: Field Survey, 2021
From table 4.1 above, 18 respondents representing 45.0% were male, while 22
respondents representing 55.0% were female. It’s obvious here that greater
percentage of the respondents were female.
Table 2: Responses as to Marital Status
Single 27 67.5
Married 13 32.5
Total 40 100
Source: Field Survey, 2021
From table 4.2 above, 27 respondents representing 67.5% were single, while 13
respondents representing 32.5% were married. Thus a greater percentage of the
respondents were single compared to the married ones.
The following are the research questions and responses of the respondents:
Yes 32 80
No 8 20
Total 40 100
Source: Field Survey, 2021
From the table above, 32 respondents representing 80% believed that Emenite
Limited adopt Cost Management for their business operation, while 8 respondents
representing 20% disagreed.
RESEARCH QUESTION 2: WHAT IS THE NEED FOR COST
MANAGEMENT TO EMENITE LIMITED, ENUGU?
From the above responses, 20 respondents representing 50% believed that the
Need for Cost Management to Emenite Limited, Enugu was to increase revenue,
18 respondents representing 45% believed that it was to improve competitive
advantage, while 2 respondents representing 5% said that it was to encourage
marketing.
RESEARCH QUESTION 3: HOW EFFECTIVE IS THE COST
MANAGEMENT STRATEGY ADOPTED BY EMENITE LIMITED,
ENUGU?
From the above data, 22 respondents representing 55% believed that the cost
management strategy adopted by Emenite Limited, Enugu was very effective, 16
respondents representing 40% believed that it was effective, while 2 respondents
representing 5% said it was not effective.
RESEARCH QUESTION 4: TO WHAT EXTENT DOES COST
MANAGEMENT CONTRIBUTE TO PROFITABILITY IN EMENITE
LIMITED, ENUGU?
From the above data, 24 respondents representing 60% believed that cost
management contribute to profitability in Emenite Limited, Enugu to a very high
extent, 14 respondents representing 35% believed that it was to a high extent,
while 2 respondents representing 5% said that it was to some extent.
4.2 Discussion of Findings
The various research questions as regards this study have been examined and the
findings for research question one showed that a greater percentage of the
respondents (80%) were of the opinion that Emenite Limited, Enugu adopt Cost
Management for their business operation.
In the research question, a greater percentage of the respondents (50% and 45%)
were of the opinion that the needs for Cost Management to Emenite Limited,
Enugu were to increase revenue and to promote competitive advantage
respectively.
In the research question three, a greater percentage of the respondents (55%) were
of the opinion that the cost management strategy adopted by Emenite Limited,
Enugu was very effective.
CHAPTER FIVE
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
From the responses gotten from the respondents, some interesting findings were
made.
5.2 Conclusion
From the research carried out so far, the researcher was able to note that:
1. Business enterprises in Nigeria adopts Cost Management for their business
operation
2. The Need for Cost Management to business enterprises in Nigeria were to
increase revenue and to encourage competitive advantage.
3. The cost management strategy adopted by most of the business enterprises
in Nigeria are very effective.
4. Cost management contribute to profitability of business enterprises in
Nigeria.
5.3 Recommendations
Based on the findings of this study, it was thus recommended that:
i. Company policy makers and transaction advisors should be keen on making
financial performance.
formulated and be used keenly and with a lot of controls to avoid critical
financial loses.
REFERENCES
Ademola, G., Samuel O. and Ifedolapo, O. (2012).The Roles of Record Keeping In
the Survival and Growth of Small Scale Enterprises in Ijumu Local
Government Area of Kogi State. Global Journal of Management and
Business Research, 12(13).
Amoako, G. K. (2013).Accounting Practices of SMEs: A Case Study of Kumasi
Metropolis in Ghana. International Journal of Business and Management,
8(24).
Anyigbo, C. I. (2014). Cost and Managerial Accounting Decision Emphasis.
Enugu: Itugo Publication Limited.
Aruwa, S. (2011). The Business Entrepreneur. Kaduna, Nigeria: Academy
Publishers.
Atijosan, Y. (2010). The Ecology of Small Business: Implications for marketing
management in Management in Nigeria Vol.34 No. 1 Jan – March 1998.
Barbara, R. (2010). Record Management, Change Management, Service Systems.
Management Journal, 20(1): 124-137.
Bititei, U., Suwignjo, P. and Came, A. (2011). Strategy Management through
Quantitative Modeling of Performance Measurement Systems. International
Journal of production Economics, 69: 15-22.
Covin, J. and Selvin, D. (2008). The Strategic Management of Small Firms in
Hostile and Beginning Environments. A strategic Management Journal, 3:
241 – 253.
Crane, M.L. (2007). Record Keeping. Essential to Risk Management NCIS.
November, 2007.
Duranti, L. and Thibodeau, K. (2011). The Inter PARES International Research
Project. Information management Journal, 35(1): 44-50.
Eric, E. and Gabriel, D. (2012), Challenges of Book Keeping on Small and
Medium Scale Enterprises (SMEs) in Kwaebibirem District: The Case of
Appex Global (Ghana) Limited. International Journal of Business and
Management Cases, 1 (2): 1-12.
Eric, H. and Gabriel, W. (2012). Accounting performance of SMEs and effect of
accounting information system: a conceptual model. Global Journal of
Management and Business Research, 17(3).
Fitzgerald, L., Johnson, R., Brignall, S., Silverstro, R. and Voss, C. (2012).
Performance Measurement in Service Business. London (CIMA).
Ikechukwu, C. (2013). Success Key Point Book Keeping and Accounts. Onitsha:
Hybrid Publisher Limited.