The document outlines criteria for scoring writing and speaking assessments in five areas:
1) Content, 2) Organization, 3) Sentence Structure, 4) Vocabulary and Style, and 5) Mechanics or Pronunciation. Each area is scored from 1 to 5, with 5 being the highest score for effectively addressing the criteria described. Descriptions are provided for each score level to illustrate what is required to receive that score.
The document outlines criteria for scoring writing and speaking assessments in five areas:
1) Content, 2) Organization, 3) Sentence Structure, 4) Vocabulary and Style, and 5) Mechanics or Pronunciation. Each area is scored from 1 to 5, with 5 being the highest score for effectively addressing the criteria described. Descriptions are provided for each score level to illustrate what is required to receive that score.
The document outlines criteria for scoring writing and speaking assessments in five areas:
1) Content, 2) Organization, 3) Sentence Structure, 4) Vocabulary and Style, and 5) Mechanics or Pronunciation. Each area is scored from 1 to 5, with 5 being the highest score for effectively addressing the criteria described. Descriptions are provided for each score level to illustrate what is required to receive that score.
The document outlines criteria for scoring writing and speaking assessments in five areas:
1) Content, 2) Organization, 3) Sentence Structure, 4) Vocabulary and Style, and 5) Mechanics or Pronunciation. Each area is scored from 1 to 5, with 5 being the highest score for effectively addressing the criteria described. Descriptions are provided for each score level to illustrate what is required to receive that score.
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 2
KRITERIA PENSKORAN WRITING ANALYICAL EXPOSITION
NO ASPEK DESKRIPSI SKOR
Relevant to the topic. Support main idea convincingly with specific, 5 appropriate example/reason/evidence 1 Content Relevant to the topic. Support main idea adequately with specific, 4 appropriate example/reason/evidence Mostly relevant to the topic. Support main idea but few points are 3 too general/ abstract/vague. Generally address the topic . Lack use of specific, appropriate 2 example/reason/evidence. Main idea is not clear. No use of specific, appropriate 1 example/reason/evidence.
Focuses on the main idea with well-organized and well-elaborated 5
text. 2 Organisation Focuses on the main idea and well-organized but not well- 4 elaborated. Focuses on the main idea but not well-organized and not well- 3 elaborated. Not focus on the main idea, sometimes has more than one main idea, 2 unwell-organized and unwell-elaborated. The main idea is not clear, lack of elaboration 1
Effective word order, no jumbled words, no mistakes in: tense, word 5
order, articles, pronoun, and preposition. 3 Sentence Standard word order, no jumbled words, few mistakes in: tense, 4 Formatting and word order, articles, pronoun, and preposition. Usage Generally, standard word order, some jumbled words, some 3 mistakes in: tense, word order, articles, pronoun, and preposition. Some standard word order, some jumbled words, many mistakes in: 2 tense, word order, articles, pronoun, and preposition. Frequent standard word order, some jumbled words, many mistakes 1 in: tense, word order, articles, pronoun, and preposition.
Well-chosen vocabulary, sentence variety and information. 5
Vocabulary is precise and the information is purposeful. 4 4 Vocabulary Vocabulary is less precise and the information is less purposeful. 3 and Style Use only basic vocabulary and not purposefully selected. Its tone is 2 flat or not consistent. Unwell-chosen vocabulary, sentence variety and information. The 1 meaning also vague.
Effective use of capitalization, punctuation, spelling and formatting. 5
Few (if any) noticeable error in capitalization, punctuation, spelling 4 and formatting. Generally, almost use effective capitalization, punctuation, spelling 3 5 Mechanic and formatting. If there is any error, it does not detract from meaning. Several errors in spelling and punctuation which detract from 2 meaning. Many misspell in simple words. 1 KRITERIA PENSKORAN SPEAKING
NO ASPEK DESKRIPSI SKOR
Relevant to the topic. Support main idea convincingly with specific, 5 appropriate example/reason/evidence 1 Content Relevant to the topic. Support main idea adequately with specific, 4 appropriate example/reason/evidence Mostly relevant to the topic. Support main idea but few points are 3 too general/ abstract/vague. Generally address the topic . Lack use of specific, appropriate 2 example/reason/evidence. Main idea is not clear. No use of specific, appropriate 1 example/reason/evidence.
Focuses on the main idea with well-organized and well-elaborated 5
text. 2 Organisation Focuses on the main idea and well-organized but not well- 4 elaborated. Focuses on the main idea but not well-organized and not well- 3 elaborated. Not focus on the main idea, sometimes has more than one main 2 idea, unwell-organized and unwell-elaborated. The main idea is not clear, lack of elaboration 1
Well-chosen vocabulary, sentence variety and information. 5
Vocabulary is precise and the information is purposeful. 4 4 Vocabulary Vocabulary is less precise and the information is less purposeful. 3 and Style Use only basic vocabulary and not purposefully selected. Its tone is 2 flat or not consistent. Unwell-chosen vocabulary, sentence variety and information. The 1 meaning also vague.
Native like pronunciation and fluency 5
Few (if any) noticeable error in pronunciation 4 Pronunciation Generally, almost use correct pronunciation. If there is any error, it 3 does not detract from meaning. 5 Several errors in pronunciation which detract from meaning. 2 Many mispronounce in simple words. 1