Pepsin As A Case Study For Method and Unit Harmonization: Industry Perspective
Pepsin As A Case Study For Method and Unit Harmonization: Industry Perspective
Pepsin As A Case Study For Method and Unit Harmonization: Industry Perspective
Presented by
Thomas K. Langdon
Vice President – Quality Assurance
American Laboratories, Inc.
Omaha, NE
` NF: “..a substance containing a proteolytic enzyme
obtained from the glandular layer of the fresh stomach
of the hog… digests not less than 3000 and not more
than 3500 times its weight of coagulated egg albumen.”
` FCC: “Obtained from the glandular layer of hog
stomach…white to light tan, water-soluble powder…”
` USP: “…prepared from the gastric mucosa of the
domestic hog (Sus scrofa L.); animals used are suitable
for human consumption. It contains gastric proteases
active in acid medium (pH 1 to 5)”.
` FIP: “..prepared from the gastric mucosa of pigs,
cattle, or sheep. It contains gastric proteases,
active in acid medium (pH 1 to 5)”.
` Ph. Eur.: “prepared from the gastric mucosa of
pigs, cattle, or sheep. It contains gastric proteases,
active in acid medium (pH 1 to 5)”.
` JP: “…a mixture of pepsin obtained from the
gastric mucosa of hog or cattle and Lactose
Hydrate…”.
` JECFA: “Commercial preparations of Pepsin
contain proteolytic enzymes obtained from the
glandular layer of the hog stomach”.
No- by all definitions pepsin is derived
from animal tissues.
` Discovered in 1836 by Theodor Schwann
` Named from the Greek word “pepsis”
(digestion)
` First animal enzyme discovered
` One of the first animal enzymes crystallized,
in 1929 by John H. Northrup.
` Pepsin Syrup Company started in 1880’s
` Beeman’s Pepsin gum – 1898
` 2009 American Laboratories, Inc. – the only
producer of pepsin in North America
` Dietary Supplement
` Digestive Aid
` Protein Hydrolysis
` Cheese making
` Leather bating (tanning process)
` Silver recovery from film (digests gelatin)
` Trichina testing (pork, horses, walrus)
` Dissolution testing
` Other?
` National Formulary – Twelfth
Edition (N.F. XII), 1965
• “Pepsin”
• “Pepsin, when assayed as herein directed digests
not less than 3000 and not more than 3500 times
its weight of coagulated egg albumen.”
w Egg albumen substrate
w Potency is determined by measurement of undigested
albumen
w Identification- “A solution of Pepsin precipitates with
solutions of tannic acid or gallic acid…”
w “Preserve Pepsin in tight containers and avoid excessive
heat.”
` United States Pharmacopeia, USP 32, 2009
• Reagents/”Pepsin, Purified”
• 1.0–1.17 Pepsin units/mg
• Hemoglobin substrate
• Spectrophotometric assay
• No identification method specified
• No storage requirements
`Food Chemicals Codex, FCC Sixth
Edition, 2008
• “Enzyme Preparations, Animal-Derived,
Pepsin”
• FCC units/mg (“One pepsin unit is defined as that quantity
of enzyme that digests 3000 times its weight of coagulated egg
albumen under the conditions of the assay.”)
• Egg albumen substrate
• Potency is determined by measurement of
undigested albumen
• No identification method specified
• “Store in tight containers in a cool, dry
place.”
` Japanese Pharmacopeia, JP XV, 2005
• “Saccharated Pepsin”
• Not less than 3800 and not more than 6000 units/g
• Casein substrate
• Spectrophotometric assay
• No identification method specified
• “Containers- Tight containers. Storage- Not
exceeding 30oC.”
` Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food
Additives (15th JECFA 1971)
• “Pepsin from Hog Stomach”
• FCC units/mg (“One pepsin unit is defined as that quantity of
enzyme that digests 3000 times its weight of coagulated egg
albumen under the conditions of the assay.”)
• Egg albumen substrate
• Potency is determined by measurement of
undigested albumen
• Identification: “…shows proteolytic activity”
• No storage requirements
` International Pharmaceutical Federation (FIP)
• Pepsin Powder (Eur. Pharm; F.I.P.)
• Not less than 0.5 pH. Eur. U. per milligram, dried
basis
• Hemoglobin substrate
• Spectrophotometric assay
• No identification method specified
• No storage requirements
“Conversion Factor”
USP u/mg X USP FCC u/mg FCC/USP
0.5 “1 x USP” 3000 6000
0.55 “1.1 x USP” 3231 5875
1.43 “2.86 x USP” 8,265 5780
1.77 “3.54 x USP” 10,390 5870
3.13 “6.26 x USP” 18,893 6038
3.27 “6.54 x USP” 20,853 6387
` Industry acceptance?
◦ Depends on how they market, if they test, how many tests they
run.
◦ Will industry accept USP units/mg or use “x USP”?
◦ Will all in industry agree that it’s always best to express the
results with appropriate units- USP u/mg?
` Possible Issues-
◦ Dietary supplement use-
x Replace all labels
x Reeducate consumers
◦ Protein hydrolysis, bulk usage-
x Completely new units means completely new calculations for protein
hydrolysis.
x Will there be any issues with equivalency after the change? Will the
same weight of pepsin in FCC units digest the same weight of protein as
pepsin in “equivalent” USP units?
x How to establish equivalency?
` Test cost, reagents, supplies, glassware
` Parts of test may be unnecessary?
◦ Double filtration
◦ Folin’s-Ciocalteu reagent
` 80% increase in labor costs. Labor is by far the
biggest cost of the test.
` 600% increase in total cost per test
` Do we adopt the method or validate a different
one?
` We still need to be proficient at the USP/pH. Eur.
Method.
` Opportunity loss due to increased labor
requirements.
Milk-Clot Method Hemoglobin Substrate
Method