Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Academic Achievement

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 4

Educational Psychology

An International Journal of Experimental Educational Psychology

ISSN: 0144-3410 (Print) 1469-5820 (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/cedp20

Academic achievement

Phillip J. Moore

To cite this article: Phillip J. Moore (2019) Academic achievement, Educational Psychology, 39:8,
981-983, DOI: 10.1080/01443410.2019.1643971

To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2019.1643971

Published online: 01 Aug 2019.

Submit your article to this journal

Article views: 22811

View related articles

View Crossmark data

Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at


https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=cedp20
EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY
2019, VOL. 39, NO. 8, 981–983
https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2019.1643971

EDITORIAL

Academic achievement

Academic achievement was once thought to be the most important outcome of formal
educational experiences and while there is little doubt as to the vital role such achieve-
ments play in student life and later (Kell, Lubinski, & Benbow, 2013), researchers and policy
makers are ever increasingly turning to social and emotional factors, as well as the relation-
ships among them, as indicators of student well-being and psychological development
(Chernyshenko, Kankaras, & Drasgow, 2018; Frydenberg, Martin, & Collie, 2017; Moore, Mok,
Chan, & Lai, 2006). Indicative of this movement is the recent addition of social and emo-
tional measures to established Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development
(OECD) measures (e.g. PISA, OECD, 2019). These measures include, according to
Chernyshenko et al. (2018), emotional regulation (e.g. stress resistance, optimism), task per-
formance (e.g. motivation, persistence, self-control) and compound skills (e.g. metacogni-
tion, self-efficacy). Consistent with this theme, you will find six quality empirical studies in
this Issue that examine some of the complexities of such factors, some related to academic
achievement, others not, having a legitimacy in their own right.
Academic achievement plays a role in the studies by Colmar, Liem, Connor, and Martin
(2019) and Martinez, Youssef-Morgan, Chambel, and Marques-Pinto (2019). For Colmar
et al. (2019), the capacity of elementary school students to respond to academic setbacks,
academic buoyancy, was not predictive of academic achievement. However, academic
buoyancy effects were demonstrated for both reading and mathematics achievement in
Australian students when mediated by self-concept. Psychological capital resources (e.g.
efficacy, hope, optimism, resilience) are foregrounded in Martinez et al.’s (2019) examin-
ation of Spanish/Portugese university students’ engagement and achievement. Their find-
ings showed that students who report being engaged in learning are more likely to be
users of psychological capital who in turn are more likely to achieve higher academically.
Academic achievement is integrated also into the work of Eakman, Kinney, Schierl, and
Henry (2019), where the focus is on the complexities of the emotional and social lives of
returned veterans and service personnel. In a comprehensive study, learning climate sup-
port, post-traumatic stress, depression, self-efficacy and academic problems are linked to
achievement showing, among other findings, that self-efficacy, less academic problems and
autonomy supporting learning environments are positively related to achievement.
Moreover, these factors persisted irrespective of depression or post-traumatic stress levels.
Achievement goals (Elliot, 2005) underpin the studies by Cho and Kim (2019) and Chen,
Elliot, and Sheldon (2019). The former examined longitudinally South Korean secondary
students and also investigated self-determined motivation (Ryan & Deci, 2000). Among
some complex findings, Cho and Kim (2019) showed that early autonomous motives were
related positively to mastery-oriented goals in the following year, which in turn were
related to increased autonomous motives in the next year. The latter study explored
psychological need support (competence, autonomy, and relatedness) in concert with
achievement goals in their Chinese university sample showing, among other results, the

This article has been republished with minor changes. These changes do not impact the academic content of the
article.
ß 2019 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group
982 EDITORIAL

importance of mastery-approach goals as mediators in linking autonomy support and self-


determined motivation.
Procrastination, academic engagement and the use of multiple social network sites (e.g.
Facebook, Twitter and Instagram) are the core elements of Closson and Bond’s (2019)
study with Canadian university students. In a very timely investigation, they reported that
the use of certain social network sites contributed to procrastination and mal-adaptation
to university life while other sites, the less complex ones, had less negative outcomes.
Each of the above studies adds significantly to our current understandings of the com-
plexities of learning. The inclusion of longitudinal work in this Issue is pleasing as is the
focus on social media influences. Greater attention could be paid to more qualitative data-
gathering to support the strong quantitative data demonstrated here. While much has
been done in examining the effects of enhancing students’ social and emotional learning
(e.g. Durlak, Domitrovich, Weissberg, & Gullotta, 2015), greater integration of these strat-
egies into teaching and learning needs to be undertaken, and researched, at all levels
of education.
I know you will appreciate reading these articles, as I have, as their contributions pro-
vide theoretically and empirically sound platforms for future investigations.
Finally, a sincere thank you to the independent reviewers who facilitated the process to
publication. Thanks also to the Editorial staff who keep us all on task.

ORCID
Phillip J. Moore http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6324-8394

References
Chen, C., Elliot, A. J., & Sheldon, K. M. (2019). Psychological need support as a predictor of intrinsic and
external motivation: The mediational role of achievement goals. Educational Psychology, 39(8), 1090–1113.
doi:10.1080/01443410.2019.1618442
Chernyshenko, O., M. Kankaras, M., & Drasgow, F. (2018). Social and emotional skills for student success and
well-being: Conceptual framework for the OECD study on social and emotional skills. OECD Education
Working Papers, No. 173. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Cho, Y. J., & Kim, M. S. (2019). Achievement goal pursuit during the transition from middle school to high
school: Its antecedents and consequences from a self-determination perspective. Educational Psychology,
39(8), 984–1004. doi:10.1080/01443410.2019.1600663
Closson, L. M., & Bond, T. A. (2019). Social network site use and university adjustment. Educational
Psychology, 39(8), 1027–1046. doi:10.1080/01443410.2019.1618443
Colmar, S., Liem, G. A. D., Connor, J., & Martin, A. J. (2019). Exploring the relationships between
academic buoyancy, academic self-concept, and academic performance: A study of mathematics and read-
ing among primary school students. Educational Psychology, 39(8), 1068–1089. doi:10.1080/01443410.2019.
1617409
Durlak, J. A., Domitrovich, C. E., Weissberg, R. P., & Gullotta, T. (2015). Handbook of social and emotional
learning: Research and practice. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Eakman, A. M., Kinney, A. R., Schierl, M. L., & Henry, K. L. (2019). Academic performance in student service
members/veterans: Effects of instructor autonomy support, academic self-efficacy and academic problems.
Educational Psychology, 39(8), 1005–1026. doi:10.1080/01443410.2019.1605048
Elliot, A. J. (2005). A conceptual history of the achievement goal construct. In A. J. Elliot & C. S. Dweck (Eds.),
Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 52–72). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Frydenberg, E., Martin, A. J., & Collie, R. J. (2017). Social and emotional learning in Australia and the Asia-
Pacific: Perspectives, programs and approaches. Singapore: Springer.
Kell, H. J., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2013). Who rises to the top? Early indicators. Psychological Science,
24(5), 648–659. doi:10.177/0956797612457784
EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY 983

Martinez, I., Youssef-Morgan, C., Chambel, M., & Marques-Pinto, A. (2019). Antecedents of academic perform-
ance of university students: Academic engagement and psychological capital resources. Educational
Psychology, 39(8), 1047–1067. doi:10.1080/01443410.2019.1623382
Moore, P. J., Mok, M. M. C., Chan, L. K. S., & Lai, P. Y. (2006). The development of an indicator system for the
affective and social schooling outcomes for primary and secondary students in Hong Kong. Educational
Psychology, 26(2), 273–301. doi:10.1080/01443410500344266
OECD (2019). PISA 2018 assessment and analytical framework. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social
development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68

Phillip J. Moore
phillip30@gmail.com

You might also like