Academic Achievement
Academic Achievement
Academic Achievement
Academic achievement
Phillip J. Moore
To cite this article: Phillip J. Moore (2019) Academic achievement, Educational Psychology, 39:8,
981-983, DOI: 10.1080/01443410.2019.1643971
EDITORIAL
Academic achievement
Academic achievement was once thought to be the most important outcome of formal
educational experiences and while there is little doubt as to the vital role such achieve-
ments play in student life and later (Kell, Lubinski, & Benbow, 2013), researchers and policy
makers are ever increasingly turning to social and emotional factors, as well as the relation-
ships among them, as indicators of student well-being and psychological development
(Chernyshenko, Kankaras, & Drasgow, 2018; Frydenberg, Martin, & Collie, 2017; Moore, Mok,
Chan, & Lai, 2006). Indicative of this movement is the recent addition of social and emo-
tional measures to established Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development
(OECD) measures (e.g. PISA, OECD, 2019). These measures include, according to
Chernyshenko et al. (2018), emotional regulation (e.g. stress resistance, optimism), task per-
formance (e.g. motivation, persistence, self-control) and compound skills (e.g. metacogni-
tion, self-efficacy). Consistent with this theme, you will find six quality empirical studies in
this Issue that examine some of the complexities of such factors, some related to academic
achievement, others not, having a legitimacy in their own right.
Academic achievement plays a role in the studies by Colmar, Liem, Connor, and Martin
(2019) and Martinez, Youssef-Morgan, Chambel, and Marques-Pinto (2019). For Colmar
et al. (2019), the capacity of elementary school students to respond to academic setbacks,
academic buoyancy, was not predictive of academic achievement. However, academic
buoyancy effects were demonstrated for both reading and mathematics achievement in
Australian students when mediated by self-concept. Psychological capital resources (e.g.
efficacy, hope, optimism, resilience) are foregrounded in Martinez et al.’s (2019) examin-
ation of Spanish/Portugese university students’ engagement and achievement. Their find-
ings showed that students who report being engaged in learning are more likely to be
users of psychological capital who in turn are more likely to achieve higher academically.
Academic achievement is integrated also into the work of Eakman, Kinney, Schierl, and
Henry (2019), where the focus is on the complexities of the emotional and social lives of
returned veterans and service personnel. In a comprehensive study, learning climate sup-
port, post-traumatic stress, depression, self-efficacy and academic problems are linked to
achievement showing, among other findings, that self-efficacy, less academic problems and
autonomy supporting learning environments are positively related to achievement.
Moreover, these factors persisted irrespective of depression or post-traumatic stress levels.
Achievement goals (Elliot, 2005) underpin the studies by Cho and Kim (2019) and Chen,
Elliot, and Sheldon (2019). The former examined longitudinally South Korean secondary
students and also investigated self-determined motivation (Ryan & Deci, 2000). Among
some complex findings, Cho and Kim (2019) showed that early autonomous motives were
related positively to mastery-oriented goals in the following year, which in turn were
related to increased autonomous motives in the next year. The latter study explored
psychological need support (competence, autonomy, and relatedness) in concert with
achievement goals in their Chinese university sample showing, among other results, the
This article has been republished with minor changes. These changes do not impact the academic content of the
article.
ß 2019 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group
982 EDITORIAL
ORCID
Phillip J. Moore http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6324-8394
References
Chen, C., Elliot, A. J., & Sheldon, K. M. (2019). Psychological need support as a predictor of intrinsic and
external motivation: The mediational role of achievement goals. Educational Psychology, 39(8), 1090–1113.
doi:10.1080/01443410.2019.1618442
Chernyshenko, O., M. Kankaras, M., & Drasgow, F. (2018). Social and emotional skills for student success and
well-being: Conceptual framework for the OECD study on social and emotional skills. OECD Education
Working Papers, No. 173. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Cho, Y. J., & Kim, M. S. (2019). Achievement goal pursuit during the transition from middle school to high
school: Its antecedents and consequences from a self-determination perspective. Educational Psychology,
39(8), 984–1004. doi:10.1080/01443410.2019.1600663
Closson, L. M., & Bond, T. A. (2019). Social network site use and university adjustment. Educational
Psychology, 39(8), 1027–1046. doi:10.1080/01443410.2019.1618443
Colmar, S., Liem, G. A. D., Connor, J., & Martin, A. J. (2019). Exploring the relationships between
academic buoyancy, academic self-concept, and academic performance: A study of mathematics and read-
ing among primary school students. Educational Psychology, 39(8), 1068–1089. doi:10.1080/01443410.2019.
1617409
Durlak, J. A., Domitrovich, C. E., Weissberg, R. P., & Gullotta, T. (2015). Handbook of social and emotional
learning: Research and practice. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Eakman, A. M., Kinney, A. R., Schierl, M. L., & Henry, K. L. (2019). Academic performance in student service
members/veterans: Effects of instructor autonomy support, academic self-efficacy and academic problems.
Educational Psychology, 39(8), 1005–1026. doi:10.1080/01443410.2019.1605048
Elliot, A. J. (2005). A conceptual history of the achievement goal construct. In A. J. Elliot & C. S. Dweck (Eds.),
Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 52–72). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Frydenberg, E., Martin, A. J., & Collie, R. J. (2017). Social and emotional learning in Australia and the Asia-
Pacific: Perspectives, programs and approaches. Singapore: Springer.
Kell, H. J., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2013). Who rises to the top? Early indicators. Psychological Science,
24(5), 648–659. doi:10.177/0956797612457784
EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY 983
Martinez, I., Youssef-Morgan, C., Chambel, M., & Marques-Pinto, A. (2019). Antecedents of academic perform-
ance of university students: Academic engagement and psychological capital resources. Educational
Psychology, 39(8), 1047–1067. doi:10.1080/01443410.2019.1623382
Moore, P. J., Mok, M. M. C., Chan, L. K. S., & Lai, P. Y. (2006). The development of an indicator system for the
affective and social schooling outcomes for primary and secondary students in Hong Kong. Educational
Psychology, 26(2), 273–301. doi:10.1080/01443410500344266
OECD (2019). PISA 2018 assessment and analytical framework. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social
development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
Phillip J. Moore
phillip30@gmail.com