Hopper Design Principles

8/14/2021 Hopper Design Principles - Chemical Engineering
SOLIDS HANDLING

PDF
HOPPER DESIGN PRINCIPLES

By Greg Mehos and Dave Morgan, Jenike & Johanson | January 1, 2016
When hoppers are designed without consideration of the actual materials being handled, problems inevitably
arise. Follow this guidance to avoid common solids-handling issues, such as erratic flow and no flow
Pivotal work on the development of the theory of bulk solids flow began in earnest in the early 1950s, when
Andrew Jenike applied a solids-mechanics-continuum concept to develop a logical, theoretical approach for
understanding and managing solids flow. He developed testing methods, equipment, and design techniques
and conducted experiments to confirm and refine his groundbreaking analysis [1].
Prior to Jenike’s work, bins and hoppers were typically designed primarily from an architectural or fabrication
standpoint (for instance, hopper walls were sloped 30 deg from vertical to reduce the waste of wall materials, or
45 deg to minimize headroom requirements and simplify design calculations). However, extensive experience
has shown that designing equipment without regard to the actual bulk materials being handled often leads to
flow problems, such as arching, ratholing, erratic flow and even no flow. By measuring the flow properties of a
bulk solid, the flow behavior of the material can be predicted, and more reliable hoppers and bins can then be
designed.
COMPETING FLOW PATTERNS
https://www.chemengonline.com/hopper-design-principles/?printmode=1 1/24
Two primary flow patterns can occur in a bin or a silo: mass flow and funnel flow (Figure 1). In mass flow, the
entire bed of solids is in motion when material is discharged from the outlet. This behavior eliminates the
formation of stagnant regions in the vessel, and affords a “first-in, first-out” flow sequence, which provides a
more uniform velocity profile during operation. A uniform velocity profile also helps to reduce the effects of
sifting segregation.
FIGURE 1. Two types of flow patterns can occur when a bulk solid is discharged from a
hopper, bin or silo: A typical funnel flow pattern is shown on the left, and a mass flow
pattern is shown on the right
By contrast, in funnel flow, an active flow channel forms above the outlet, but stagnant material remains
(called ratholes) at the periphery of the vessel. Funnel flow can cause erratic flow, exacerbate segregation,
reduce the live capacity of a vessel, allow particle degradation (leading to caking and spoilage) in stagnant
regions. Depending on the vessel size, funnel flow can also induce high loads on the structure and downstream
equipment, due to collapsing ratholes and the formation of eccentric flow channels.
For many materials, flow problems can be eliminated by ensuring that a mass flow pattern exists in the vessel.
The first step to achieving mass flow is to ensure that the converging walls are steep enough, and have friction
low enough, to allow the bulk materials to slide along them. This is accomplished by first testing the material to
measure wall friction, and then calculating the minimum hopper angle that will allow mass flow.
HOPPER ANGLE FOR MASS FLOW
Once the wall friction results are known, the recommended hopper angle to ensure mass flow can be readily
calculated. The angle of wall friction (φ’) is obtained by following the method described in ASTM D-6128 [2].
The test is performed using an instrument (shown in Figure 2) that involves placing a sample of powder inside
a retaining ring on a flat coupon of wall material. Various normal loads are then applied to the powder, and the
powder inside the ring is forced to slide along the stationary wall material. The resulting shear stress is
measured as a function of the applied normal stress.
FIGURE 2. By measuring the force required to slide a sample of powder along a wall
coupon, the angle of wall friction can be determined
After a number of values have been recorded, the wall yield locus is identified by plotting shear stress against
normal stress (Figure 3). The angle of wall friction (φ’) is the angle that is formed when a line is drawn from the
origin of that graph to a point on the wall yield locus.
FIGURE 3. The angle of wall friction (φ’) is determined by drawing a

line between the wall yield locus (which is constructed by plotting
shear stress against normal stress), and the origin, as shown here
Jenike [1] found that the hopper angle required to allow flow along the walls depends on the friction between
the powder and the walls, the friction between powder particles, and the geometry of the hopper. Design charts
originally developed by Jenike [1] provide allowable hopper angles for mass flow, given values of the wall
friction angle and the effective angle of internal friction (which is determined by shear cell testing).
The charts mentioned above [1] are summarized in Figures 4 and 5 for conical and planar hoppers (for example,
wedge-shaped hoppers and transition hoppers), respectively. Note that the outlet of a wedge-shaped hopper
must have a length that is at least three times its width for the relationship shown in Figure 5 to apply.
FIGURE 5. This plot shows the recommended wall angles to ensure mass flow in a
hopper with flat walls and a slotted outlet
Values of the allowable hopper angle θ’ (measured from vertical) are on the x -axis, and values of the wall
friction angle φ’ are on the y -axis. Any combination of φ’ and θ’ that falls within the limiting mass flow region
of the chart will provide mass flow.
Hoppers with round or square outlets should not be designed at the theoretical mass-flow hopper-angle value.
Otherwise, a small change in powder properties may cause the flow pattern inside the hopper to change from
mass flow to funnel flow — bringing its associated risk of flow problems. A 3-deg margin of safety (with
respect to the mass-flow hopper angle given in Figure 4) is recommended.
FIGURE 4. This plot shows the theoretical mass-flow hopper angles for hoppers with
round or square outlets. Note: a minimum safety factor of 3 deg should be used
Sloping walls required for mass flow in wedge-shaped hoppers can be 10–12-deg less steep than those required
to ensure mass flow in conical hoppers. Wedge-shaped and transition hoppers are therefore frequently used for
materials that have high wall friction.
MINIMUM OUTLET DIMENSION
The outlet of the hopper section must be large enough to prevent cohesive arches or stable ratholes from
developing. The required outlet size depends on the cohesive strength and the bulk density of the powder. The
cohesive strength is measured by shear-cell testing, as described in ASTM D-1628 [2] and D-6773 [3].
Figure 6 shows schematic diagrams for two common shear-cell testers. A sample of powder is placed in a cell
and then pre-sheared — that is, the sample is consolidated by exerting a normal stress, and then sheared until
the measured shear stress is steady. (This is shown in Figure 7, by the point (σss, τss)).
FIGURE 6. Two versions of the shear cell tester — the direct shear cell tester (top) and
the ring shear cell tester (bottom) — are used to measure the cohesive strength of bulk
solids
Next, the shear step is conducted. During this step, the vertical compacting load is replaced with a smaller load,
and the sample is again sheared until it fails. These pre-shear and shear steps are repeated at the same
consolidation level for a number of reduced normal stresses, and the yield locus is then determined by plotting
the failure shear stress against the normal stress (Figure 7).
FIGURE 7. A Mohr’s circle drawn through the steady-state point and tangent to the
yield locus gives the major consolidation stress. A Mohr’s circle tangent to the yield
locus that passes through the origin gives the cohesive strength
From the yield locus, the major consolidation stress (σ1) and the cohesive strength ( f c) are determined.
Because bulk solids are anisotropic, the stress on the sample varies with direction. The maximum value of the
stress, which is called the major consolidation stress, depends on the material’s internal friction and the
magnitudes of the normal and shear stresses imparted on the sample during the test.
Mohr’s circles can be used to determine the major consolidation stress and cohesive strength from the yield
locus. The major consolidation stress is the value of the intersection of the horizontal axis and a Mohr’s circle,
drawn through the steady-state point and tangent to the yield locus. The cohesive strength is related to the
state of stress where a free boundary exists. Hence, the cohesive strength is the intersection of the horizontal
axis and a Mohr’s circle that passes through the origin (where stress equals zero) and is tangent to the yield
locus. The kinematic angle of internal friction (φ) and effective angle of internal friction (δ) can also be
determined, as shown in Figure 7.
By conducting the test over a range of consolidation states, the relationship between consolidation pressure
and the cohesive strength of the bulk material can be established, following a procedure established and
described by Jenike [1]. This relationship is commonly called the material’s Flow Function. An example of a
powder’s Flow Function is given in Figure 8.
FIGURE 8. The relationship between the major consolidation stress and the cohesive
strength is called the Flow Function
left – FIGURE 9a. The flow factor (ff) is the ratio of the arch stress to the major consolidation stress and depends on the effective angle of in
the hopper geometry, the hopper angle, and the wall friction angle. The above diagram gives flow factors for conical hoppers, δ = 50 deg
right – FIGURE 9b. The diagram shown here gives flow factors for hoppers with flat walls and slotted outlets, δ = 50 deg
Once a material’s Flow Function has been determined, the minimum outlet width or diameter that will prevent
cohesive arching can be calculated, using the hopper’s flow factor (ff). Jenike defined the flow factor using
Equation (1):
(1)
The flow factor is a function of the powder’s effective angle of internal friction, the hopper angle, and the wall
friction angle. Charts that provide flow factors for conical and wedge-shaped hoppers are given in Jenike [1];
Examples are shown in Figures 9a and 9b. Typical values of the flow factor range between 1.1 and 1.7.
Superimposing the material’s Flow Function and flow factor on the same graph allows the cohesive strength
and arch stress to be compared. The flow factor is constructed by drawing a line having a slope equal to 1/ff
through the origin.
There are three possibilities:
The Flow Function lies below the flow factor, and the two curves do not intersect. When this is the case,
the stress imparted on the arch is always greater than the material’s cohesive strength, and there is no
minimum outlet dimension requirement to prevent cohesive arching
The Flow Function lies above the flow factor and the curves do not intersect. The bulk solid will not flow
due to gravity alone, and another means of discharging the powder must be employed
The Flow Function and flow factor intersect, as shown in Figure 10. At the point where the two lines
intersect, the arch stress and the cohesive strength of the bulk solid are the same and equal to the critical
stress (σcrit)
FIGURE 10. The critical stress σcrit is determined from the intersection of the Flow
Function and flow factor. At the point where the two lines intersect, the arch stress and
the cohesive strength of the bulk solid are the same, and equal to the critical stress
The minimum outlet diameter or width to prevent a cohesive arch from developing, Bmin, can then be
calculated from Equation (2):
(2)
The function H (θ’) is shown in Figure 11. For funnel flow hoppers, the outlet must be large enough to prevent a
cohesive arch and stable rathole from developing. To prevent the formation of a stable rathole, the hopper
outlet diagonal should equal or exceed the critical rathole diameter, DF. The critical rathole diameter is
calculated by first determining the major consolidating pressure, σ1, on the powder. In some cases, the
consolidating load can be estimated by the Janssen equation (Equation (3)):
FIGURE 11. Functions H(θ’) and G(Φ). are used to determine outlet dimensions that prevent a cohesive arch or stable rathole from developin
(3)
The critical rathole dimension is then calculated using Equation (4):
(4)
In Equation (4), f C is the cohesive strength of the powder at the calculated consolidation pressure.
For wedge-shaped and pyramidal hoppers, stable ratholes will not form if the diagonal of the outlet is equal to
D F or greater. The diameter of the outlet of a conical funnel-flow hopper should not be less than the critical
rathole dimension.
If a hopper with a circular outlet is designed with an opening large enough to prevent the development of a
stable rathole, cohesive arching will not occur. For wedge-shaped hoppers, the width of the slotted outlet must
be large enough to prevent a cohesive arch from developing. The same procedure that is used to determine the
minimum outlet width to prevent arching in a wedge-shaped mass–flow hopper is followed, except that a flow
factor of 1.7 is used.
Note that these analyses assume continuous handling of the powder. If the powder is to be stored at rest for a
period of time, time tests should be conducted. Time tests are described in ASTM D-6128 and D-6773 [ 2, 3 ].
FEEDER CONSIDERATIONS
Feeders can also be a source of hopper flow problems if the incorrect devices are used or if they are improperly
designed. This is especially true for hoppers with slotted outlets, where feeders should be designed to draw
uniformly along the entire cross-section of the outlet in order for mass flow to occur. However, even hoppers
with round outlets can have uneven flow if a proper interface is not utilized.
Rotary valves are often used beneath hoppers with round outlets. They are particularly useful for applications
where a seal must be provided to prevent air from flowing out of or into the hopper outlet. If a rotary valve is
used, a short vertical spool section should be installed between the hopper outlet and valve inlet. Otherwise,
material may flow preferentially from the upside of the valve and affect the flow pattern inside the vessel. This
is shown in Figure 12.
FIGURE 12. A hopper with a rotary valve should have a spool section above the valve inlet (left); otherwise, preferential flow may occur
on one side of the hopper (right)
Screw feeders are primarily used to control the discharge of powders from hoppers with slotted outlets. A screw
is comprised of a series of flights wound around one or more shafts. A screw that has a constant pitch and
diameter (and a constant shaft diameter) will give rise to the formation of a flow channel at the back of the
hopper over the first flight of the screw. As shown in Figure 13, this channel will draw material from the top
surface into the flow channel until a stable rathole forms and the channel empties. The rathole will then
periodically fail as the base of the material falls above the screw. This will continue to broaden the flow
channel, and this cyclic fail-flow-empty cycle will continue until the hopper empties.
FIGURE 13. A screw feeder with a constant diameter and a constant pitch screw results in funnel flow. A mass-flow screw feeder where the s
has a tapered shaft and increasing pitch sections ensures that all material will flow when discharged
A mass flow screw feeder, comprised of a tapered section followed by a section with increasing pitch, ensures
that the capacity of the feeder increases in the direction of flow (see Figure 13). The length of the cone and the
pitch schedule are chosen such that the capacity of the screw increases linearly along the hopper length. The
length of the screw must be between three and six times the width of the hopper to meet fabrication tolerances,
and the screw diameter is equal to the hopper width.
DISCHARGE RATE
For coarse powders, the maximum discharge rate from a mass flow hopper can be calculated using Equation
(5):
(5)
The parameter m is equal to 0 for slotted outlets, and is equal to 1 for round or square outlets. The mass
discharge rate is equal to the product of the velocity, outlet cross-sectional area, and the material’s bulk
density at the outlet.
The maximum flowrate of a fine powder can be several orders-of- magnitude lower than that of coarser
materials, due to an adverse gas-pressure gradient that forms. Because of vacuum that naturally develops
above a hopper outlet when the voids in fine powders expand as the material discharges, the resulting counter
flow of gas will hinder the solids flow. A limiting condition occurs when the compaction in the cylinder section
forces too much gas out through the material’s top surface.
At a critical solids-discharge rate, the solids-contact pressure drops to zero, and efforts to exceed this limiting
discharge rate will result in erratic flow. Permeability testing is required to determine the outlet size required to
achieve a desired discharge rate for fine powders. The limiting discharge rate from a mass-flow hopper for fine
powders can be calculated using Equation (6):
(6)
The magnitude of the pressure gradient depends on the bulk density and the permeability of the powder. Note
that because of the vacuum that develops above the hopper outlet, the pressure gradient, dP/dz, is negative. See
Schulze [4] for a discussion of the challenges of accurately predicting the pressure gradient.
FINAL REMARKS
Compared to liquids and gases, chemical engineers’ training in bulk-solids handling is often lacking. By
understanding the fundamental principles and conducting proper flow properties tests, a chemical engineer
can design reliable systems for storing and handling bulk solids. Knowing the relationship between a material’s
cohesive strength and consolidation stress allows the engineer to calculate hopper-outlet dimensions that will
prevent flow obstructions from developing. Similarly, wall-friction test results allow engineers to determine
hopper geometries that are required to promote mass flow. Permeability tests are required to calculate limiting
mass-flow discharge rates.
Edited by Suzanne Shelley
References
1. Jenike, A.W., Storage and Flow of Solids, Bulletin 123, University of Utah Engineering Station,
1964 (revised, 1976).
2. ASTM D-6128, Standard Test Method for Shear Testing of Bulk Solids Using the Jenike Shear
Cell, ASTM International, 2006.
3. ASTM D-6773, Standard Shear Test Method for Bulk Solids Using the Schulze Ring Shear Tester,
ASTM International, 2008.
4. Schulze, D., “Powders and Bulk Solids – Behavior, Characterization, Storage, and Flow,”
Springer, New York, 2007.
Author
Greg Mehos is a senior project engineer with Jenike & Johanson, Inc. (400 Business Park Dr.,
Tyngsboro, Mass.; Phone: 978-649-3300; Email: gmehos@jenike.com), and an adjunct
professor at the University of Rhode Island. Mehos has been involved in a wide range of bulk-
solids handling projects, including designs of hoppers, dryers, gasifiers and moving-bed
reactors, as well as analyses of purge and conditioning columns. He received his B.S. and Ph.D. in
chemical engineering from the University of Colorado and an M.S.Ch.E. from the University of
Delaware. He is a registered professional engineer in Colorado and Massachusetts and a member of AIChE. He
served on the executive board of AIChE’s Particle Technology Forum and is a past chair of the Boston AIChE
section.
David S. Morgan is a senior consultant at Jenike & Johanson (3485 Empresa Dr., San Luis Obispo,
CA 93401; Phone: 805-541-0901; Email: dmorgan@ jenike.com). He has more than 40 years
experience as a consultant specializing in the storage and flow of granular bulk material. Morgan
has published several technical papers, participated in various international conferences, and
presented numerous short courses in the field of bulk solids flow. He holds a B.Sc. (Eng.) from the
University of Natal, South Africa.
Related Content
FACTS AT YOUR FINGERTIPS: HOPPER OUTLET GEOMETRY AND ARCHING
When transferring stored bulk-solids materials from hoppers, bins and silos, flow stoppage can occur
because of bridging or arching at…
PEMA AND KANSAS ST. UNIVERSITY BULK SOLIDS INNOVATION CENTER FORM PARTNERSHIP
The Process Equipment Manufacturers’ Association (PEMA; Falls Church, Va.; www.pemanet.org) and the
Bulk Solids Innovation Center (BSIC; bulk-solids.k-state.edu) at Kansas…
PRINCIPLES OF AGGLOMERATION: PELLETIZING PROCESSES
Pelletizing, a tumble-growth agglomeration process, offers many potential benefits to processors

handling bulk solid materials. This article provides an overview…
FACTS AT YOUR FINGERTIPS: AGGLOMERATION PROCESSES
Agglomeration converts fine powder particles into larger ones by introducing external forces. Major
benefits for solids processors include dust reduction,…

FACTS AT YOUR FINGERTIPS: SOLIDS FRICTION IN BINS AND HOPPERS
To avoid problems with solids flow in bins and hoppers, the friction between the equipment walls and the
flowing solids…
SEARCH...
BREAKTHROUGH TECHNOLOGIES
ANTI-BIOFOULING COATING FOR DESALINATION MEMBRANES EXTENDS LIFETIMES
PILOTING A PROCESS THAT MAKES HYDROGEN AND CARBON FROM METHANE
LOW-ENERGY HYDROGENATION WITHOUT H2 GAS
RECOVERING CARBON BLACK FROM WASTE TIRES
SUSTAINABLE MINING OF RAW MATERIALS FROM THERMAL SPRINGS
COLLECT MORE SOLAR ENERGY AND WASTE HEAT FOR PROCESS WATER HEATING
A PROJECT TO FURTHER DEVELOP SOLAR-THERMAL-ENERGY STORAGE TECHNOLOGY
THIS SUSTAINABLE, SUPERCHARGED CATALYST CLEANS UP MOLD
CHEMENTATOR BRIEFS
Chemical Engineering publishes FREE eletters that bring our original content to our readers in an easily accessible email
format about once a week.
Subscribe Now
FLOWSIC100 Flare-XT: Ultrasonic flare gas measurement

(https://www.chemengonline.com/videos/flowsic100-flare-xt-ultrasonic-
flare-gas-measurement-sick-ag/)
Partner Videos
More from GEA 

(/videos/?tag=gea)
White Biotech – safeguarding the future of generations

(https://www.chemengonline.com/videos/white-biotech-safeguarding-the-future-of-generations/)
Crystal clear - ultrapure chemicals

(https://www.chemengonline.com/videos/crystal-clear-ultrapure-chemicals/)
More from GEA 
(/videos/?tag=gea)
View All Videos »

(/videos/)
What is this?
Steel Belt Units for Medical Membranes
Upstream Oil & Gas: Automation intelligence from wellhead to distribution
Video - CoriolisMaster
Video - Do you really need a thermowell?
The influence of IIoT in the dewatering process step of pigment production
View More
Home
Magazine
Account
Subscribe
Jobs
Sitemap
Buyers' Guide
Archives
Upcoming Show Previews
Connect
Webinars
Sponsored Content
Events & Announcements
White Papers
Advertising & Media Kit
Networking & Discussion Groups
Career Tools
Editorial Submissions and Upcomings
About
About Us
Awards
Privacy Policy
FAQs
Contact
Editor's Comments
Copyright Policy & Permissions
Diversity Inclusion & Equity
This publication contains text, graphics, images, and other content (collectively "Content"), which are for informational purposes only. Certain articles contain
the author's personal recommendations only.
RELIANCE ON ANY INFORMATION SUPPLIED IN THIS PUBLICATION IS SOLELY AT YOUR OWN RISK.
©2021, Access Intelligence, LLC. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy | Diversity Inclusion & Equity

Hopper Design Principles - Chemical Engineering

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Hopper Design Principles - Chemical Engineering

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Hopper Design Principles - Chemical Engineering

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

8/14/2021 Hopper Design Principles - Chemical Engineering

COMPETING FLOW PATTERNS

HOPPER ANGLE FOR MASS FLOW

FIGURE 3. The angle of wall friction (φ’) is determined by drawing a

MINIMUM OUTLET DIMENSION

There are three possibilities:

The critical rathole dimension is then calculated using Equation (4):

Edited by Suzanne Shelley

Pelletizing, a tumble-growth agglomeration process, offers many potential benefits to processors

benefits for solids processors include dust reduction,…

ANTI-BIOFOULING COATING FOR DESALINATION MEMBRANES EXTENDS LIFETIMES

PILOTING A PROCESS THAT MAKES HYDROGEN AND CARBON FROM METHANE

LOW-ENERGY HYDROGENATION WITHOUT H2 GAS

RECOVERING CARBON BLACK FROM WASTE TIRES

SUSTAINABLE MINING OF RAW MATERIALS FROM THERMAL SPRINGS

A PROJECT TO FURTHER DEVELOP SOLAR-THERMAL-ENERGY STORAGE TECHNOLOGY

THIS SUSTAINABLE, SUPERCHARGED CATALYST CLEANS UP MOLD

FLOWSIC100 Flare-XT: Ultrasonic flare gas measurement

More from GEA 

White Biotech – safeguarding the future of generations

Crystal clear - ultrapure chemicals

View All Videos »

Steel Belt Units for Medical Membranes

Upstream Oil & Gas: Automation intelligence from wellhead to distribution

Video - Do you really need a thermowell?

The influence of IIoT in the dewatering process step of pigment production

You might also like