Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

PD Pump Sizing

Download as xls, pdf, or txt
Download as xls, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 11

Pumping System Pressure Estimate v. 1.4 579451833.

xls
1 of 11
rev. 1.4 1.4
Project Number & Name
Atmospheric Pressure 14.7 psia
Equipment Number & Name
Fluid Liq SO3
Case SS316
Preparer & Date Rohan Verma
Checker & Date

Suction, Discharge, Parallel, or Overall Suction Discharge Overall

Flow 400 gpm 400 gpm 400 gpm


Temperature 99 F 99 F 99 F
Density 120.0 lb/ft3 120.0 lb/ft3 120.0 lb/ft3
Viscosity 1.75 cP 1.75 cP 1.75 cP
Vapor Pressure 5.4 psia 5.4 psia

Total Pressure -798.2 ± 119.7 psig 0.0 ± 0.0 psig 798.2 ± 119.7 psi

Usable Pressure 398.4 psig 0.0 psig -398.4 psi


Elevation of Source or Destination above Pump 393.7 ft 328.1 psi ft 0.0 psi -328.1 psi
Pressure at Source or Destination 66 psig 66.0 psig psig 0.0 psig -66.0 psi
Velocity Pressure 4.3 psi 0.0 psi -4.3 psi
Diameter of Source or Destination Vessel or Branch 3 in in

Friction Pressure 1196.5 ± 119.7 psi 0.0 ± 0.0 psi 1196.5 ± 119.7 psi
Equipment, Instruments, and Piping Specialties 0.0 psi 0.0 psi 0.0 psi
Sizing Basis Flow 400 gpm 400 gpm
Sizing Basis Pressure Drop psi psi
Sizing Basis Density 120 lb/ft3 120 lb/ft3
Straight Pipe 1196.5 ± 119.7 psi 0.0 ± 0.0 psi 1196.5 ± 119.7 psi
Nominal Size 3 in 3 in
Schedule 5S, 10S, 40S, 80S, 160, PP, PTFE, Tube, or - 40S 40S
Diameter 3.068 in 3.068 in
Corroded or Like New
Roughness 0.0250 mm 0.0250 mm
Relative Roughness 0.00032 0.00032
Velocity 17.4 ft/s 17.4 ft/s
Reynolds Number 452,856 452,856
Fanning Friction Factor 0.0041 0.0041
Length 4724 ft ft
Fittings and Valves 4% 0.0 ± 0.0 psi 0.0 ± 0.0 psi 0.0 ± 0.0 psi
Complexity Factor .3-.5 Simple, 1 Normal, 2-4 Complex 0.0
Flanged or Welded, or Threaded
Elbows
Long Radius, r/D=1.5
Standard Radius, r/D=1
Entrance ki .5 Flush, 1 Dip Pipe
Exit Pipe Diameter if Exiting Velocity Pressure Is Lost in
Increasers
Inlet Diameter 3.068 in 3.068 in
Outlet Diameter 3.068 in 3.068 in
Inlet Relative Roughness 0.00032 0.00032
Inlet Velocity 17.4 ft/s 17.4 ft/s
Inlet Reynolds Number 452,856 452,856
Inlet Fanning Friction Factor 0.0041 0.0041
Reducers
Inlet Diameter 3.068 in 3.068 in
Outlet Diameter 3.068 in 3.068 in
Inlet Velocity 17.4 ft/s 17.4 ft/s
Inlet Reynolds Number 452,856 452,856
Tees
Branch-Flow
1.4 Run-Through
Valves
Ball
Butterfly
Check, Swing Type
Diaphragm
Gate
Globe
Other Fitting or Valve k Value

Available Suction Total Pressure -788.9 ± 119.7 psia

Brake Horsepower 232.8 ± 34.9 hp


Pumping Power 186.2 ± 27.9 hp
Pump Efficiency 80%

Energy Cost Present Value 516,689 ± 77,455 $


Fraction of Time at Design Conditions 97%
Motor Efficiency 90%
Power Cost 0.0445 $/kWh
Facility Design Life 9.5 yr
Real Interest Rate 6% 1/yr
Pumping System Pressure Estimate v. 1.4 579451833.xls
2 of 11
1.4

Perry 1997 page 6-16

Karassik 1998 page 422, Perry 1997 page 10-22

Perry 1997 page 10-22


"
"
"

"
Perry 1997 page 6-16

Perry 1997 pages 6-9 and 6-10, HI 1990 page 25

Idel'Chik 1994 pages 105-109

Perry 1997 page 6-10


Chen 1979, 1980, Churchill 1977

Brown 1987, Perry 1997 pages 6-10, 6-16

Darby 2001, Hooper 1981, HI 1990 page 79


Darby 2001, HI 1990 page 79
Hooper 1981

Hooper 1988, Chen 1979, 1980, HI 1990 page 79

Perry 1997 page 6-10


Chen 1979, 1980, Churchill 1977
Hooper 1988, Chen 1979, 1980, HI 1990 page 79

Perry 1997 page 6-10

Darby 2001, HI 1990 page 79


Darby 2001, Darby 2008, HI 1990 page 79

Darby 2001, HI 1990 page 79 gate valve


Hooper 1981, HI 1990 page 79 gate valve
Darby 2001, HI 1990 page 79
Darby 2001, HI 1990 page 79 gate valve
Darby 2001, HI 1990 page 79
"

Perry 1997 pages 10-23, 10-22

Perry 1997 page 9-13


Lenz 1970
NEMA 2001, Perry 1997 page 29-4
U.S. Census Bureau 2002
IRS 2002
Siegel 2002
Pumping System Pressure Estimate v. 1.4 579451833.xls
3 of 11
rev.
Project Number & Name
Atmospheric Pressure 14.7 psia
Equipment Number & Name
Fluid Liq SO3
Case
Preparer & Date Rohan Verma
Checker & Date

Suction, Discharge, Parallel, or Overall Suction Discharge Overall

1.3 Flow 0 gpm 0 gpm 0 gpm


Temperature 0 F 0 F 0 F
Density 0.0 lb/ft3 0.0 lb/ft3 0.0 lb/ft3
Viscosity 0 cP 0 cP 0 cP
Vapor Pressure 0.0 psia 0.0 psia

Total Pressure 0.0 ± 0.0 psig 0.0 ± 0.0 psig 0.0 ± 0.0 psi

Usable Pressure 0.0 psig 0.0 psig 0.0 psi


Elevation of Source or Destination above Pump 0.0 ft 0.0 psi 0.0 ft 0.0 psi 0.0 psi
Pressure at Source or Destination 0.0 psig 0.0 psig 0.0 psig 0.0 psig 0.0 psi
Velocity Pressure 0.0 psi 0.0 psi 0.0 psi
Diameter of Source or Destination Vessel or Branch 0.0 in 0.0 in

Friction Pressure 0.0 ± 0.0 psi 0.0 ± 0.0 psi 0.0 ± 0.0 psi
Equipment, Instruments, and Piping Specialties 0.0 psi 0.0 psi 0.0 psi
Sizing Basis Flow
Sizing Basis Pressure Drop
Sizing Basis Density
Straight Pipe 0.0 ± 0.0 psi 0.0 ± 0.0 psi 0.0 ± 0.0 psi
Nominal Size 0 in 0 in
Schedule 5S, 10S, 40S, 80S, 160, PP, PTFE, Tube, or - 0 0
Diameter 0.000 in 0.000 in
Corroded or Like New 0 0
Roughness 0.0000 mm 0.0000 mm
Relative Roughness 0.00000 0.00000
Velocity 0.0 ft/s 0.0 ft/s
Reynolds Number 0 0
Fanning Friction Factor 0.0000 0.0000
Length 0 ft 0 ft
Fittings and Valves 0.0 ± 0.0 psi 0.0 ± 0.0 psi 0.0 ± 0.0 psi
Complexity Factor .3-.5 Simple, 1 Normal, 2-4 Complex
Flanged or Welded, or Threaded 0 0
Elbows
1.2 Long Radius, r/D=1.5
Standard Radius, r/D=1
Entrance ki .5 Flush, 1 Dip Pipe
Exit Pipe Diameter if Exiting Velocity Pressure Is Lost
Increasers
Inlet Diameter
Outlet Diameter
Inlet Relative Roughness
Inlet Velocity
Inlet Reynolds Number
Inlet Fanning Friction Factor
Reducers
Inlet Diameter
Outlet Diameter
Inlet Velocity
Inlet Reynolds Number
Tees
Branch-Flow
Run-Through
Valves
Ball
Butterfly
Check, Swing Type
Diaphragm
Gate
Globe
Other Fitting or Valve k Value

Available Suction Total Pressure 14.7 ± 0.0 psia

Brake Horsepower ± hp
Pumping Power ± hp
Pump Efficiency 80%

Energy Cost Present Value ± $


Fraction of Time at Design Conditions 97%
Motor Efficiency 90%
Power Cost 0.0445 $/kWh
Facility Design Life 9.5 yr
Real Interest Rate 6% 1/yr
Pumping System Pressure Estimate v. 1.4 579451833.xls
4 of 11

Perry 1997 page 6-16

Karassik 1998 page 422, Perry 1997 page 10-22

Perry 1997 page 10-22


"
"
"

"

Idel'Chik 1994 pages 105-109

Perry 1997 page 6-10


Chen 1979, 1980, Churchill 1977

Brown 1987, Perry 1997 pages 6-10, 6-16

HI 1990 page 79
"

"

Perry 1997 page 6-10


Chen 1979, 1980, Churchill 1977
HI 1990 page 79

Perry 1997 page 6-10

HI 1990 page 79
"

"
"
"
"
"
"

Perry 1997 pages 10-23, 10-22

Perry 1997 page 9-13


Lenz 1970
NEMA 2001, Perry 1997 page 29-4
U.S. Census Bureau 2002
IRS 2002
Siegel 2002
Pumping System Pressure Estimate v. 1.4 579451833.xls
5 of 11
rev. 1.4 1.4 1.4

Pipeline Number and Description


Suction, Discharge, Parallel, or Overall

Flow gpm gpm gpm


Temperature F F F
Density lb/ft3 lb/ft3 lb/ft3
Viscosity cP cP cP
Vapor Pressure psia psia psia

Total Pressure Contributions 0.0 ± 0.0 psi 0.0 ± 0.0 psi 0.0 ± 0.0 psi

Usable Pressure 0.0 psi 0.0 psi 0.0 psi


Elevation of Source or Destination above Pump ft 0.0 psi ft 0.0 psi ft 0.0 psi
Pressure at Source or Destination psig 0.0 psi psig 0.0 psi psig 0.0 psi
Velocity Pressure 0.0 psi 0.0 psi 0.0 psi
Diameter of Source or Destination Vessel or Branch in in in

Friction Pressure 0.0 ± 0.0 psi 0.0 ± 0.0 psi 0.0 ± 0.0 psi
Equipment, Instrument, or Piping Specialty 0.0 psi 0.0 psi 0.0 psi
Sizing Basis Flow gpm gpm gpm
Sizing Basis Pressure Drop psi psi psi
Sizing Basis Density lb/ft3 lb/ft3 lb/ft3
Straight Pipe 0.0 ± 0.0 psi 0.0 ± 0.0 psi 0.0 ± 0.0 psi
Nominal Size in in in
Schedule 5S, 10S, 40S, 80S, 160, PP, PTFE, Tube, or -
Diameter 0.000 in 0.000 in 0.000 in
Corroded or Like New
Roughness 0.0000 mm 0.0000 mm 0.0000 mm
Relative Roughness 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000
Velocity 0.0 ft/s 0.0 ft/s 0.0 ft/s
Reynolds Number 0 0 0
Fanning Friction Factor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Length ft ft ft
Fittings and Valves 0.0 ± 0.0 psi 0.0 ± 0.0 psi 0.0 ± 0.0 psi
Complexity Factor .3-.5 Simple, 1 Normal, 2-4 Complex
Flanged or Welded, or Threaded
Elbows
Long Radius, r/D=1.5
Standard Radius, r/D=1
Entrance ki .5 Flush, 1 Dip Pipe
Exit Pipe Diameter if Exiting Velocity Pressure Is Lost in in in
Increasers
Inlet Diameter 0 in 0 in 0 in
Outlet Diameter 0 in 0 in 0 in
Inlet Relative Roughness 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000
Inlet Velocity 0.0 ft/s 0.0 ft/s 0.0 ft/s
Inlet Reynolds Number 0 0 0
Inlet Fanning Friction Factor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Reducers
Inlet Diameter 0.000 in 0.000 in 0.000 in
Outlet Diameter 0.000 in 0.000 in 0.000 in
Inlet Velocity 0.0 ft/s 0.0 ft/s 0.0 ft/s
Inlet Reynolds Number 0 0 0
Tees
Branch-Flow
1.4 Run-Through
Valves
Ball
Butterfly
Check, Swing Type
Diaphragm
Gate
Globe
Other Fitting or Valve k Value
Pumping System Pressure Estimate v. 1.4 579451833.xls
6 of 11
1.4 1.4 1.2 1.4

gpm gpm gpm


F F F
lb/ft3 lb/ft3 lb/ft3
cP cP cP
psia psia psia

0.0 ± 0.0 psi 0.0 ± 0.0 psi 0.0 ± 0.0 psi

0.0 psi 0.0 psi 0.0 psi


ft 0.0 psi ft 0.0 psi ft 0.0 psi
psig 0.0 psi psig 0.0 psi psig 0.0 psi
0.0 psi 0.0 psi 0.0 psi
in in in

0.0 ± 0.0 psi 0.0 ± 0.0 psi 0.0 ± 0.0 psi


0.0 psi 0.0 psi 0.0 psi
gpm gpm gpm
psi psi psi
lb/ft3 lb/ft3 lb/ft3
0.0 ± 0.0 psi 0.0 ± 0.0 psi 0.0 ± 0.0 psi
in in in

0.000 in 0.000 in 0.000 in

0.0000 mm 0.0000 mm 0.0000 mm


0.00000 0.00000 0.00000
0.0 ft/s 0.0 ft/s 0.0 ft/s
0 0 0
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
ft ft ft
0.0 ± 0.0 psi 0.0 ± 0.0 psi 0.0 ± 0.0 psi

in in in

0 in 0 in 0 in
0 in 0 in 0 in
0.00000 0.00000 0.00000
0.0 ft/s 0.0 ft/s 0.0 ft/s
0 0 0
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.000 in 0.000 in 0.000 in


0.000 in 0.000 in 0.000 in
0.0 ft/s 0.0 ft/s 0.0 ft/s
0 0 0
Pumping System Pressure Estimate v. 1.4 579451833.xls
7 of 11
1.4 1.4 1.4

gpm gpm gpm


F F F
lb/ft3 lb/ft3 lb/ft3
cP cP cP
psia psia psia

0.0 ± 0.0 psi 0.0 ± 0.0 psi 0.0 ± 0.0 psi

0.0 psi 0.0 psi 0.0 psi


ft 0.0 psi ft 0.0 psi ft 0.0 psi
psig 0.0 psi psig 0.0 psi psig 0.0 psi
0.0 psi 0.0 psi 0.0 psi
in in in

0.0 ± 0.0 psi 0.0 ± 0.0 psi 0.0 ± 0.0 psi


0.0 psi 0.0 psi 0.0 psi
gpm gpm gpm
psi psi psi
lb/ft3 lb/ft3 lb/ft3
0.0 ± 0.0 psi 0.0 ± 0.0 psi 0.0 ± 0.0 psi
in in in

0.000 in 0.000 in 0.000 in

0.0000 mm 0.0000 mm 0.0000 mm


0.00000 0.00000 0.00000
0.0 ft/s 0.0 ft/s 0.0 ft/s
0 0 0
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
ft ft ft
0.0 ± 0.0 psi 0.0 ± 0.0 psi 0.0 ± 0.0 psi

in in in

0 in 0 in 0 in
0 in 0 in 0 in
0.00000 0.00000 0.00000
0.0 ft/s 0.0 ft/s 0.0 ft/s
0 0 0
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.000 in 0.000 in 0.000 in


0.000 in 0.000 in 0.000 in
0.0 ft/s 0.0 ft/s 0.0 ft/s
0 0 0
Pumping System Pressure Estimate v. 1.4 579451833.xls
8 of 11
1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4

gpm gpm gpm


F F F
lb/ft3 lb/ft3 lb/ft3
cP cP cP
psia psia psia Perry 1997 page 6-16

0.0 ± 0.0 psi 0.0 ± 0.0 psi 0.0 ± 0.0 psi Karassik 1998 page 422, Perry 1997 page 10-22

0.0 psi 0.0 psi 0.0 psi Perry 1997 page 10-22
ft 0.0 psi ft 0.0 psi ft 0.0 psi "
psig 0.0 psi psig 0.0 psi psig 0.0 psi "
0.0 psi 0.0 psi 0.0 psi "
in in in

0.0 ± 0.0 psi 0.0 ± 0.0 psi 0.0 ± 0.0 psi "
0.0 psi 0.0 psi 0.0 psi Perry 1997 page 6-16
gpm gpm gpm
psi psi psi
lb/ft3 lb/ft3 lb/ft3
0.0 ± 0.0 psi 0.0 ± 0.0 psi 0.0 ± 0.0 psi Perry 1997 pages 6-9 and 6-10, HI 1990 page 25
in in in

0.000 in 0.000 in 0.000 in

0.0000 mm 0.0000 mm 0.0000 mm Idel'Chik 1994 pages 105-109


0.00000 0.00000 0.00000
0.0 ft/s 0.0 ft/s 0.0 ft/s
0 0 0 Perry 1997 page 6-10
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Chen 1979, 1980, Churchill 1977
ft ft ft
0.0 ± 0.0 psi 0.0 ± 0.0 psi 0.0 ± 0.0 psi
Brown 1987, Perry 1997 pages 6-10, 6-16

Darby 2001, Hooper 1981, HI 1990 page 79


Darby 2001, HI 1990 page 79
Hooper 1981
in in in
Hooper 1988, Chen 1979, 1980, HI 1990 page 79
0 in 0 in 0 in
0 in 0 in 0 in
0.00000 0.00000 0.00000
0.0 ft/s 0.0 ft/s 0.0 ft/s
0 0 0 Perry 1997 page 6-10
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Chen 1979, 1980, Churchill 1977
Hooper 1988, Chen 1979, 1980, HI 1990 page 79
0.000 in 0.000 in 0.000 in
0.000 in 0.000 in 0.000 in
0.0 ft/s 0.0 ft/s 0.0 ft/s
0 0 0 Perry 1997 page 6-10

Darby 2001, HI 1990 page 79


Darby 2001, Darby 2008, HI 1990 page 79

Darby 2001, HI 1990 page 79 gate valve


Hooper 1981, HI 1990 page 79 gate valve
Darby 2001, HI 1990 page 79
Darby 2001, HI 1990 page 79 gate valve
Darby 2001, HI 1990 page 79
"
Pumping System Pressure Estimate v. 1.4 579451833.xls
9 of 11
rev.
Sch Roughness Size
mm in

- 0.0250 Miller 1990 1 0.5 0.75 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 4 6 8 10 12 16 20 24


5S 0.0250 " 2 0.710 0.920 1.185 1.770 2.245 2.709 3.334 4.334 6.407 8.407 10.482 12.438 15.670 19.624 23.564 Perry 1997 pages 10-72 to 10-74
10S 0.0250 " 3 0.674 0.884 1.097 1.682 2.157 2.635 3.260 4.260 6.357 8.329 10.420 12.390 15.624 19.564 23.500 "
40S 0.0250 " 4 0.622 0.824 1.049 1.610 2.067 2.469 3.068 4.026 6.065 7.981 10.020 12.000 "
80S 0.0250 " 5 0.546 0.742 0.957 1.500 1.939 2.323 2.900 3.826 5.761 7.625 9.750 11.750 "
160 0.0250 " 6 0.464 0.612 0.815 1.338 1.687 2.125 2.624 3.438 5.187 6.813 8.500 10.126 12.812 16.062 19.312 "
PP 0.0000 Resistoflex 2002 7 0.74 1.27 1.72 2.12 2.70 3.64 5.62 7.62 9.56 11.41 Resistoflex 2002
PTFE 0.0000 " 8 0.78 1.31 1.82 2.80 3.76 5.61 7.46 9.73 11.69 "
Tube 0.0025 Miller 1990 9 0.902 1.402 1.870 2.370 2.870 3.834 HI 1990 page 47
Pumping System Pressure Estimate v. 1.4 579451833.xls
10 of 11
rev. 1.4
References

General Anthony, James, Pumping System Head Estimation, Chemical Engineering Progress, February 2005

Abrams 1997 Abrams, Jack, Quickly Estimate Pipe Sizing with 'Jack's Cube', Chemical Engineering Progress 93(12), pp. 55-58, Dec 1997
Branan 1994 Branan, Carl, Rules of Thumb for Chemical Engineers, Gulf Publishing, Houston, Texas, pp. 4-6, 1994
Brown 1987 Brown, Grant S., How to predict pressure drop before designing the piping, Chemical Engineering 94(4), pp. 85-86, March 16, 1987
Crane 1988 Crane Valve, Flow of Fluids through Valves, Fittings, and Pipe, Technical Paper No. 410, p. A-29, 1988
Chen 1980 Chen, Ning Hsing, Comments on: An Explicit Equation for Friction Factor in Pipe, Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Fundamentals 19, pp. 228-
Chen 1979 230,
Chen,1980
Ning Hsing, An Explicit Equation for Friction Factor in Pipe, Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Fundamentals 18(3), pp. 296-297, 1979
Churchill 1977 Churchill, Stuart W., Friction-factor equation spans all fluid-flow regimes," Chemical Engineering 84(24), pp. 91-92, November 7, 1977
1.4 Darby 2008 Darby, Ron, Errata, Fluid Mechanics for Chemical Engineers, Second Edition - Second Printing, November 17, 2008
Darby 2001 Darby, Ron, Correlate Pressure Drops Through Fittings, Chemical Engineering 108(4), pp. 127-130, Apr 2001; 108(12), pp. 8-10, Nov 2001
Durand 1999 Durand, Alejandro Anaya, et al, Updated Rules for Pipe Sizing, Chemical Engineering, 106(5), pp. 153-156, May 1999
Goulds 2001 Goulds Pumps, B-3 Piping Design, http://www.gouldspumps.com/cat_technews.ihtml?pid=76&step=4, 2001
HI 1990 Hydraulic Institute, Hydraulic Institute Engineering Data Book, 2nd ed., Hydraulic Institute, Cleveland, OH, pp. 25, 47, 79, 1990
Hooper 1988 Hooper, William B., Calculate head loss caused by change in pipe size, Chemical Engineering, pp. 89-92, November 7, 1988
Hooper 1981 Hooper, William B., The two-K method predicts head losses in pipe fittings, Chemical Engineering, pp. 96-100, August 24, 1981
Idel'Chik 1994 Idel'Chik, I. E., Handbook of Hydraulic Resistance - 3rd ed., CRC, Boca Raton, Florida, pp. 105-109, 1994
IRS 2002 Internal Revenue Service, How To Depreciate Property, Publication 946, Cal. No. 13081F, http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/p946.pdf, pp. 93-102,
Karassik 1998 2002
Karassik, Igor J., and McGuire, J. T., Centrifugal pumps: selection, operation, and maintenance, Chapman & Hall, New York, p. 422, 1998
Karassik 1976 Karassik, Igor J., Pump Handbook, McGraw-Hill, pp. 11-14 to 11-19, 1976
Lenz 1970 Lenz, R. E., Reliability Design in Process Plants, Chemical Engineering Progress 66(12), pp. 42-44, December 1970
McPherson 2000 McPherson, T., Improve CPVC Piping Reliability, Hydrocarbon Processing 79(1), pp. 65-68, Jan 2000
Miller 1990 Miller, Donald S., Internal flow systems - 2nd ed., BHRA, Cranfield, UK, pp. 190-191, 1990
NEMA 2001 NEMA, Energy Management Guide for Selection and Use of Fixed Frequency Medium AC Squirrel-Cage Polyphase Induction Motors, MG 10-
2001, http://www.nema.org/DocUploads/57D634E6-FF3C-4492-B3D73108C1E4F02D/MG10.pdf, p. 9, 2001
Perry 1997 Perry, Robert H., Green, Don W., and Maloney, James O'Hara, Perry's chemical engineers' handbook. - 7th ed., McGraw-Hill, New York, pp. 6-9,
6-10, 6-16, 9-13, 10-22, 10-23, 10-72 to 10-74, and 29-4, 1997
Resistoflex 2002 Resistoflex, Plastic-Lined Pipe Dimensions & Liner Thickness, http://www.resistoflex.com/pdf/thickness.pdf, 2002
Siegel 2002 Siegel, Jeremy, The Rise in Stock Values and Future Equity Returns, The Journal of Management Consulting, 7/1/2002
Stewart 1996 Stewart, Jesse C., and Seiberling, Dale, Clean in Place, Chemical Engineering 103(1), pp. 72-79, Jan 1996
U.S. Census Bureau 2002 U.S. Census Bureau, Statistical Abstract of the United States, http://www.census.gov/prod/2003pubs/02statab/energy.pdf, p. 572, 2002
Weast 1978 Weast, Robert C., Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 59th Edition, Chemical Rubber Company, West Palm Beach, Florida, p. E-47, 1978
Pumping System Pressure Estimate v. 1.4 579451833.xls
11 of 11
rev.
Version Description Prepared Checked Approved

1.0 Initial Issue James M. Anthony, P.E.


janthony@lg.com
314 919-3208
Copyright 2004

1.1 Updated to match 02CEP_P revision level. James M. Anthony, P.E.


10/02/2005

1.2 Corrected Multi sheet discharge column long radius elbows summary. James M. Anthony, P.E.
10/02/2005

1.3 Made Multi sheet discharge flow equal Multi sheet suction flow. James M. Anthony, P.E.
09/04/2007

1.4 Updated Ki for flanged run-through tees. James M. Anthony, P.E.


01/12/2008

You might also like