Becoming Strong
Becoming Strong
Becoming Strong
I
n March, China’s top diplomat, in every single domain. China rejects
Yang Jiechi, made headlines when U.S. leadership on some issues, but as a
he told U.S. officials at a summit in developing country, it will limit compe-
Alaska that they did “not have the tition to areas in which it feels it has an
qualification . . . to speak to China from a advantage, such as the fight against
position of strength.” Even after years of COVID-19, poverty reduction, trade,
heightened tensions between Beijing and international infrastructure and devel-
Washington, the remark seemed unusu- opment, digital payment systems, and
ally harsh, especially coming from a 5G technologies, among others. Across
seasoned diplomat. The setting, too, was the board, however, a post-pandemic
noteworthy: Yang was speaking at the first China will make its voice heard with
high-level diplomatic meeting between greater determination than before and
China and the United States since U.S. will push back forcefully against any
President Joe Biden entered the White attempts to contain it.
House. It seemed like an unmistakable
warning to the new administration. CHINA’S DUAL IDENTITY
At home, Yang’s comment circulated To be the world’s “largest developing
widely on social media, resonating with country” (a popular moniker in Beijing)
the belief of many Chinese that their once meant that China’s capabilities
country has found its voice on the surpassed those of its immediate peers.
global stage. International media read Nowadays, it means the country’s power
the statement as reflective of a post- is second only to that of the United
pandemic China: ambitious and outspo- States. Consider the sharp contrast
ken in its claim to global leadership. between Chinese success and American
Yang’s statement did, indeed, reflect a failure in the fight against COVID-19:
paradigm shift underway in Beijing: China suffered the least among all major
China believes that its rise to great- powers during the pandemic and is the
power status entitles it to a new role in only major economy to have grown over
world affairs—one that cannot be the past year. By the end of 2020, its
reconciled with unquestioned U.S. GDP had reached 71 percent of U.S. GDP,
up from 66 percent in 2019, and Chi-
nese policymakers are confident that
YAN XUETONG is a Distinguished Professor
and Dean of the Institute of International they will close the remaining gap in the
Relations at Tsinghua University. coming decade. In their eyes, China has
40 F O R E I G N A F FA I R S
July/August 2021 41
Yan Xuetong
gone through the stages of standing up speech, “forever belong to the family of
and getting rich and is now advancing to developing countries.”
the stage of becoming strong. The This dual identity will color all
U.S.-led unipolar order is fading away, aspects of China’s post-pandemic foreign
its demise hastened by China’s rise and policy. As a developing country, China
the United States’ relative decline. In its still lacks the resources required of a
place will come a multipolar order, with true world leader, with globe-spanning
U.S.-Chinese relations at its core. responsibilities, especially in the mili-
Until recently, Beijing viewed this tary realm. As a great power, however, it
once-in-a-century shift with unalloyed will not follow the United States’ lead,
optimism, predicting a “bright future for and on some issues, competition with
Chinese national rejuvenation.” The Washington will be inevitable.
turmoil of the Trump years—especially Take the issue of ideological rivalry.
Washington’s decision in 2017 to label On the one hand, China is anxious not
China a “strategic competitor”—caused to frame relations with the West as a
Chinese officials to dial down their new Cold War: leaders in Beijing
enthusiasm. China’s most recent five- believe that Soviet-style ideological
year plan strikes a more sober tone, expansionism could trigger a backlash
listing opportunities in the realm of that might hinder their country’s
technology and development and continued growth, and they do not
warning of the instability fueled by expect their ideology to become as
“unilateralism, protectionism, and popular as Western liberalism is to-
hegemonism.” Yet the bottom line, in day—hence their insistence that China
Beijing’s eyes, remains the same: China is a developing country “with Chinese
has become a global power that can meet characteristics,” a phrase meant to
the rest of the world on an equal footing. imply that its political system and
China’s global reach still has its governance model cannot merely be
limits. Despite being a major power, exported to other countries.
China also thinks of itself as a develop- On the other hand, China will try to
ing country—and rightly so, consider- shape an ideological environment
ing that its GDP per capita remains far favorable to its rise, pushing back
behind those of advanced economies. against the notion that Western politi-
(The International Monetary Fund puts cal values have universal appeal and
China’s 2020 GDP per capita at only validity. The United States defines
$10,484, compared with $40,146 for democracy and freedom in terms of
Japan, $45,733 for Germany, and electoral politics and individual expres-
$63,416 for the United States.) The sion, for example, whereas China
“developing country” label is also meant defines them in terms of social security
to signal Beijing’s geopolitical align- and economic development. Washing-
ment: even if China catches up with the ton will have to accept these diver-
West economically, the thinking goes, gences of opinion rather than try to
its loyalties will still lie firmly with the impose its own views on others.
developing world—it will, as Chinese The same conviction will animate
President Xi Jinping put it in a 2018 China’s post-pandemic diplomatic
42 F O R E I G N A F FA I R S
strategy. Contrary to the common
perception, Beijing does not reject
multilateral rules and institutions out of
hand. It will not, however, accept rules
that the United Sates makes without
consultation with China. Instead,
Beijing’s objective is for international
norms to rest on a truly inclusive multi-
lateralism. Such is the idea behind the
China-based multilateral forums that
Beijing has been building with a host of
states and regions, such as its coopera-
tion forums with African, Arab, Latin
American, Pacific island, and Southeast
Asian states. From other major powers,
meanwhile, Beijing expects treatment
based on equality and mutual respect, as
illustrated by its assertive retaliatory
sanctions strategy. When the Trump
administration imposed sanctions on 14
high-ranking Chinese officials over the
disqualification of some Hong Kong law-
makers, China took revenge with sanc-
tions on 28 American officials, including
then Secretary of State Mike Pompeo.
Likewise, Beijing quickly retaliated
against British and EU sanctions over the
Xinjiang issue. On both of these matters,
the Chinese government considers any
sanctions or criticism of its policies as
interference in its internal affairs.
China’s economic policies are shift-
ing, too, impelled both by the pandemic,
which revealed the vulnerability of
global supply chains, and by U.S.
attempts at economic decoupling. In
fact, the Chinese government believes
that protectionism, a slowing world
economy, and shrinking global markets
will outlast the pandemic. Under a new
“dual circulation” strategy, which was
unveiled at a high-profile Chinese
Communist Party meeting in May
2020, Beijing therefore aims to lessen
July/August 2021 43
Yan Xuetong
44 F O R E I G N A F FA I R S
Becoming Strong
July/August 2021 45
Yan Xuetong
46 F O R E I G N A F FA I R S
Becoming Strong
tions led by Washington and others led shifting domestic and foreign circum-
by Beijing will be a less trustworthy stances, following Deng Xiaoping’s
partner for both powers. It could also approach of “crossing the river by
become common for members of the feeling the stones.” The coming era will
same coalition to punish one another be no different: achievements and
for actions required by their member- failures will inform China’s path and
ship in other clubs. For instance, both choices. The backdrop to these adjust-
Australia and China are members of the ments, however, will be a radically
Regional Comprehensive Economic altered global landscape, in which
Partnership, a trade agreement among a unilateral decisions by Washington and
dozen states in the Asia-Pacific, yet the various alliances and issue-specific
disputes over human rights recently led coalitions it leads will no longer be as
Australia to cancel its BRI deal with viable as they once were. As many
China, which responded by suspending states prepare for a return to life after
an economic dialogue between the two the pandemic, they should come to
countries. Likewise, eastern European terms with this new reality.∂
states have often told Chinese diplo-
mats that their membership in the EU
forces them to side against China on
political matters. The same countries,
however, cooperate with China on
infrastructure investment and technol-
ogy, at the risk of violating EU regula-
tions, citing their participation in the
Cooperation Between China and
Central and Eastern European Coun-
tries, a diplomatic forum in the region
initiated by China.
Such conflicts are likely to heighten
political instability and accelerate the
trend toward deglobalization in the
decade ahead, but they are preferable to
a world split into rigid geopolitical
blocs. As long as individual states
remain members of clubs on both sides
of the divide, it will not be in their
interest to throw in their lot with one
side only. This bipolar configuration
will cause some tension, but on the
whole, it will be far less dangerous than
all-out, Cold War–style competition.
China’s post-pandemic foreign policy
is just beginning to take shape. Beijing
has always adjusted its policies to
July/August 2021 47