A Review of The Alternative Fuels Infrastructure Regulation (AFIR) Proposal
A Review of The Alternative Fuels Infrastructure Regulation (AFIR) Proposal
A Review of The Alternative Fuels Infrastructure Regulation (AFIR) Proposal
MARCH 2022
6.1
6
kilowatts per electric car or van on the roads
5.7 5.7
4.6 4.5
4.3
4.0
4
0
Croatia
Bulgaria
Latvia
Austria
Slovakia
Czech Republic
Netherlands
Hungary
Italy
Estonia
Malta
Belgium
Finland
Luxembourg
Romania
Germany
Portugal
Spain
Cyprus
France
Sweden
Denmark
Ireland
Lithuania
Poland
Greece
Figure 1. Total publicly accessible charging power output (in kW, data from Eco-Movement) per
electric car and van on the roads at the end of 2021 for every European Union Member State
(data not available for Slovenia).
Many countries in the eastern part of the EU (e.g., Bulgaria, Latvia, and Slovakia) are
performing particularly well relative to the AFIR target, and have more public charging
capacity per vehicle than countries in the western and northern parts of Europe (e.g.,
Sweden, Denmark, and France). However, these eastern countries have had lower
electric vehicle uptake and have fewer charge points in absolute terms.
2.1
Publicly accessible power output in
kilowatts (kW) per electric vehicle
2.0
1.6
1.5
1.3
Alternative Fuels Infrastructure
Regulation (AFIR) proposed 1.1
target for battery−electric vehicles 1.0 kW per battery electric vehicle
1.0
0.95
0.75
0.65 kW per plug−in hybrid vehicle
0.55
AFIR proposed target for 0.60
0.5 plug−in hybrid vehicles
Figure 2. Recommended total public power output per BEV (blue) and per PHV (red) depending
on Member States’ electric share of car and van stock.
2 ICCT FACT SHEET | A REVIEW OF THE ALTERNATIVE FUELS INFRASTRUCTURE REGULATION (AFIR) PROPOSAL
Markets with an electric car and van stock share below 5% will require public charging
power output of at least 1.6 kW per BEV and 0.75 kW per PHV. This is currently the
case for all EU Member States but Sweden. In the longer run—once 15% of a Member
States’ car and van stock is electric—the required public charging capacity will be 1
kW per BEV and 0.55 kW per PHV, similar to the AFIR proposal. This level of electric
vehicle uptake is expected for 2028 in the EU as a whole.
HEAVY-DUTY VEHICLES
The AFIR provisions regarding heavy-duty vehicles propose minimum requirements
for the rollout of the charging and hydrogen refueling infrastructure across the core
and comprehensive Trans-European Network for Transport (TEN-T). To assess the
suitability of the targets proposed by the European Commission, the ICCT conducted a
detailed bottom-up assessment of infrastructure needs for zero-emission trucks.
The proposed charging infrastructure rollout targets under the AFIR exceed the needs
of the battery-electric truck fleet in 2025. Nonetheless, it is essential to maintain these
targets because a rapid rollout of the infrastructure for zero-emission trucks is critical
to provide confidence in electric trucks among manufacturers and fleet operators
during the early market uptake phase. On the other hand, the AFIR proposal largely
underestimates the charging infrastructure needs for 2030 by more than 80%
(Figure 3).
The rollout of hydrogen refueling infrastructure resulting from the proposed targets
overestimates the needs of the fleet and would not be needed until 2035. This is
driven by the low expected market uptake for fuel cell trucks relative to battery-electric
trucks. Based on a techno-economic analysis developed by the ICCT, fuel cell trucks
would account for only 9% of the long-haul truck sales by 2050.
The infrastructure rollout must not be homogeneous across Member States but
rather targeted based on traffic volumes along the different segments of the TEN-T
network. This recommendation stems from our analysis of traffic flow data.
Figure 3. Total required installed power as calculated by the ICCT and compared to targets
proposed by the European Commission and by the European Parliament’s rapporteur.
The AFIR targets for heavy-duty vehicles could be amended to align with the ICCT
results regarding the total required charging power and hydrogen refueling stations’
capacity, while giving flexibility to adopt lower targets based on traffic volume across
the different segments of the TEN-T network. By default, Member States should
comply with the highest proposed targets. However, Member States can pursue lower
targets on some roads of their domestic TEN-T network by applying to the European
3 ICCT FACT SHEET | A REVIEW OF THE ALTERNATIVE FUELS INFRASTRUCTURE REGULATION (AFIR) PROPOSAL
Commission for a derogation complete with documentation of the low traffic volumes
along these roads.
Several recommendations can be drawn from the analysis. These are summarized
below and presented in Figure 4:
» For the 2025 targets, increase the charging pool nominal power requirements
across the core TEN-T network to 2,000 kW every 60 km, while allowing the
flexibility to adopt lower targets based on traffic volumes.
» For the 2030 targets, align the charging pool nominal power requirements for the core
and comprehensive networks and increase the nominal power to 9,000 kW every 60
km while allowing the flexibility to adopt lower targets based on traffic volumes.
» For hydrogen refueling stations, eliminate the simultaneous requirement for liquid
and compressed hydrogen and increase the hydrogen refueling station nominal
capacity requirement to 3 tonnes per day every 150 km while allowing the flexibility
to adopt lower targets based on traffic volumes. We also recommend postponing
the implementation of these targets until 2035.
Charging: Core network 2025 (every 60 km) Charging: Core network 2030 (every 60 km)
2.5 12
< 3,000 3,000 6,000 > 9,000 < 3,000 3,000 6,000 > 9,000
Charging pool capacity (MW)
1.4 MW 6
6 MW
1
4 COMMISSION’S PROPOSAL
0.5 0.7 MW 3 MW
2
0.35 MW 1.4 MW
0 0
0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000 0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000
Traffic flow (HDVs/day) Traffic flow (HDVs/day)
Charging: Comprehensive network 2030 (every 60 km) Hydrogen: Trans-European network 2035 (every 150 km)
12 4
Hydrogen station capacity (t/day)
< 3,000 3,000 6,000 > 9,000 < 3,000 3,000 6,000 > 9,000
Charging pool capacity (MW)
to to 3.5 to to
10 6,000 9,000 6,000 9,000 3t/day
3
9 MW COMMISSION’S PROPOSAL for 2030
8
2.5 (liquid + compressed H2)
6 2
6 MW
2t/day
1.5
4
1
3 MW 1t/day
2 COMMISSION’S PROPOSAL
0.5
(every 100 km) 0.5t/day
1.4 MW
0 0
0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000 0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000
Traffic flow (HDVs/day) Traffic flow (HDVs/day)
Figure 4. ICCT’s proposal for traffic-based targets for the rollout of charging and hydrogen
refueling infrastructure along the Trans-European Network for Transport – core and
comprehensive.
4 ICCT FACT SHEET | A REVIEW OF THE ALTERNATIVE FUELS INFRASTRUCTURE REGULATION (AFIR) PROPOSAL
PUBLICATION DETAILS
Title: A review of the AFIR proposal: How much power output is needed for public charging
infrastructure in the European Union?
Authors: Marie Rajon Bernard, Michael Nicholas, Sandra Wappelhorst, and Dale Hall
Download: https://theicct.org/publication/europe-ldv-review-of-afir-proposal-how-much-power-
output-needed-for-public-charging-infrastructure-in-the-eu-mar22
www.theicct.org
Contact: mrajonbernard@theicct.org
communications@theicct.org
Title: A review of the AFIR proposal: Public infrastructure needs to support the transition to a twitter @theicct
zero-emission truck fleet in the European Union.
Authors: Pierre-Louis Ragon, Eamonn Mulholland, Hussein Basma, and Felipe Rodríguez
Download: https://theicct.org/publication/europe-hdv-review-of-afir-proposal-public-
infrastructure-needs-to-support-transition-to-zero-emission-truck-fleet-in-eu-mar22
Contact: p.ragon@theicct.org