Smart Cities Research 3

Measuring levels of
supply and demand

for e-services and
Smart Cities Research Brief
e-government: No.3
a toolkit for cities

1 Document information
1.1 Author(s) and Institution(s)
MEMORI is the research institute of the University College of Mechelen.

MEMORI’s expertise is in the following research fields:
• public communication;
• communication of non-governmental organisations;
• local participatory democracy;
• local e-government.
Elke Van Soom is researcher at Memori since August 2008. She has a
master in Communication Sciences (VUB 1993) and worked from 1993
to 2008 at the Flemish Public Broadcaster VRT as audience researcher,
project leader and policy maker. At Memori she manages research projects
on tourist marketing and e-government.
Memori is engaged in several research projects that are modelling concepts

for advanced, interactive digital communities & provide a framework for
evaluation and development of local e-government policies. This research
brief is based on the project proposals for these research projects.
Each concrete project proposal is customised according to the city’s

wishes and needs, but basing it on a fixed model enables comparison and
benchmarking of the results.
1.2 Intended audience
This document gives some background information for cities/municipalities

who want to align their e-government policies and services with the user’s
wishes and needs.
2 Digital City Development: getting to know your
audience in 5 steps
Most cities offer some kind of e-government services, from a simple e-mail form
to the most sophisticated applications. Often this offer is mainly content- and
technology driven, and not based on the needs and expectations of the different
target groups. In order to develop a well balanced e-government vision and
operation, it has to be more than a (re)organisation of technological platforms.
It has to be founded on the relationship between a government and its different
target groups: citizens, companies, associations.
The best way to map out this relationship is a well balanced survey that looks
at the digital services and information from both a demand perspective (citizen,
local companies and associations) and a supplier’s perspective (municipality and
city services).
Such a survey should:

• Identify the use, needs, areas of interest and priorities of the different target
groups regarding local e-government
• Inventory and analyse the existing digital services
• Evaluate supply and demand, with concrete advice on priorities in digital
development in short, middle and long term.
• Be broad enough to count as a zero base measurement, in order to be able
to realise relevant succession surveys
In order to realise these targets, 5 work packages are usually defined:
1. Supply perspective: inventory and benchmarking
Inventory and evaluate the existing digital services and information provision
and compare it to the product catalogue. Most important in this phase is linking
the digital services catalogue to the city’s general and e-government policy. It
is of vital importance that e-gov services and solutions are embedded in the
municipality’s global and communications policy. E-government is not just about
technology!
When this inventory is made it can be benchmarked against cities of comparable

size and function.
2. Supply and demand perspective: list of indicators
The goal is to develop a set of indicators to

• Map the citizens’ ICT and internet usage
• Map knowledge and use of local e-government services
• Detect barriers and stimuli for use of internet and local e-government
These indicators should answer to the SMART-principle: be Specific, Measurable,

Achievable, Realistic and Timely.
The indicators are used for measuring the city’s current digital status in order to
check the feasibility of new services and opportunities. They need to be objective
and fairly general. Specific data, evaluations and opinions have their place in
work packages 3 and 4.
3. Demand perspective: local e-gov points for attention & citizen’s

priorities
Gain a balanced insight in knowledge and attitude towards and use of digital city
services and information sources. In depth analysis of needs, areas of interest
and evaluation of possible applications.
The best technique to get this in depth view are focus group interviews. Focus
group research is based on facilitating an organized discussion with a group of
individuals selected because they were believed to be representative of some
class. Discussion is used to bring out insights and understandings in ways which
simple questionnaire items may not be able to tap.
4. Demand perspective: develop a representative image of local e-gov

use, take up and priorities
In this work package we set out to establish (in a representative way) how the
population feels about the current and future (possible) local e-government
services.
Goal is to obtain representative numerical data about knowledge, attitude, usage

and appreciation of local website and digital community services and information
sources. Best technique is a broad survey, either written, telephone assisted or
face to face, based on a fixed questionnaire.
5. Integration – indicators and recommendations
Finally all elements from previous work packages should be integrated in a

coherent whole. The result should be a balanced report that levels policy with
user needs (all users, from individuals to companies and local organizations) and
embeds short term recommendations (including quick wins) in a long term vision.
www.smartcities.info
3 Further information
3.1 Contacts with expertise within Smart Cities partnership
Elke Van Soom is researcher at Memori since August 2008. She has a
master in Communication Sciences (VUB 1993) and worked from 1993
to 2008 at the Flemish Public Broadcaster VRT as audience researcher,
project leader and policy maker.
Memori has conducted several of these research projects for Belgian cities
and service providers.
3.2 Document history
Date : 2009.02.25
Version : 1
Author : Elke Van Soom
www.smartcities.info
www.epractice.eu/community/smartcities
The Smart Cities project is creating an innovation network between cities and academic
partners to develop and deliver better e-services to citizens and businesses in the North
Sea Region. Smart Cities is funded by the Interreg IVB North Sea Region Programme of the
European Union.
Smart Cities is PARTLY funded by the Interreg IVB North Sea Region Programme of the
European Union. The North Sea Region Programme 2007-2013 works with regional
development projects around the North Sea. Promoting transnational cooperation, the
Programme aims to make the region a better place to live, work and invest in.
9 781907 576041

Smart Cities Research 3

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Smart Cities Research 3

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Measuring levels of

supply and demand

a toolkit for cities

MEMORI is the research institute of the University College of Mechelen.

Memori is engaged in several research projects that are modelling concepts

Each concrete project proposal is customised according to the city’s

1.2 Intended audience

This document gives some background information for cities/municipalities

Such a survey should:

In order to realise these targets, 5 work packages are usually defined:

1. Supply perspective: inventory and benchmarking

When this inventory is made it can be benchmarked against cities of comparable

2. Supply and demand perspective: list of indicators

The goal is to develop a set of indicators to

These indicators should answer to the SMART-principle: be Specific, Measurable,

3. Demand perspective: local e-gov points for attention & citizen’s

4. Demand perspective: develop a representative image of local e-gov

Goal is to obtain representative numerical data about knowledge, attitude, usage

5. Integration – indicators and recommendations

Finally all elements from previous work packages should be integrated in a

3.2 Document history

You might also like