s2 Wireless Communication
s2 Wireless Communication
s2 Wireless Communication
TECHNOLOGY
By-
Dr. Pinku Ranjan
Assistant Professor
ABV-IIITM GWALIOR, INDIA
ABV-IIITM GWALIOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY Dr. Pinku Ranjan
WIRELESS COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY Dr. Pinku Ranjan
Example
• Assume a spectrum of 120 kHz is allocated
ABV-IIITM GWALIOR
3
WIRELESS COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY Dr. Pinku Ranjan
4
WIRELESS COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY Dr. Pinku Ranjan
5
WIRELESS COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY Dr. Pinku Ranjan
Typical Frequencies
• FM Radio ~ 88 MHz
ABV-IIITM GWALIOR
6
WIRELESS COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY Dr. Pinku Ranjan
Why Wireless?
• Benefits
– Mobility: Ability to communicate anywhere!!
– Easier configuration, set up and lower installation cost
ABV-IIITM GWALIOR
• Difficulties
– Communication medium: Free space
• Noisy and unpredictable channel
• Broadcast channel, more user ->less BW per user
– Higher equipment cost
– Usually regulated spectrum and limited BW
• Techno-politic
– Need backbone systems in order to function properly
7
WIRELESS COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY Dr. Pinku Ranjan
Challenges
• Efficient Hardware
ABV-IIITM GWALIOR
8
WIRELESS COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY Dr. Pinku Ranjan
Challenges
• Network support for user mobility (mobile
ABV-IIITM GWALIOR
scenarios)
– Location identification, Handoffs,..
• Maintaining quality of service over unreliable
links.
• Connectivity and coverage (internetworking)
• Cost efficiency
9
WIRELESS COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY Dr. Pinku Ranjan
Challenges
• Fading
ABV-IIITM GWALIOR
• Multipath
• Higher probability of data corruption
– Hence, need for stronger channel codes
• Need for stronger security mechanisms
– Privacy, Authentication.
10
Evolution of Mobile Radio
Communications
Major Mobile Radio Systems
1934 - Police Radio uses conventional AM mobile communication system.
1935 - Edwin Armstrong demonstrate FM
1946 - First public mobile telephone service - push-to-talk
1960 - Improved Mobile Telephone Service, IMTS - full duplex
1960 - Bell Lab introduce the concept of Cellular mobile system
1968 - AT&T propose the concept of Cellular mobile system to FCC.
1976 - Bell Mobile Phone service, poor service due to call blocking
1983 - Advanced Mobile Phone System (AMPS), FDMA, FM
1991 - Global System for Mobile (GSM), TDMA, GMSK
1991 - U.S. Digital Cellular (USDC) IS-54, TDMA, DQPSK
1993 - IS-95, CDMA, QPSK, BPSK
Example of Mobile Radio
Systems
• Examples
– Cordless phone
– Remote controller
– Hand-held walkie-talkies
– Pagers
– Cellular telephone
– Wireless LAN
• Mobile - any radio terminal that could be moves during operation
• Portable - hand-held and used at walking speed
• Subscriber - mobile or portable user
12
• Classification of mobile radio transmission system
– Simplex: communication in only one direction
– Half-duplex: same radio channel for both transmission and
reception (push-to-talk)
– Full-duplex: simultaneous radio transmission and reception (FDD,
TDD)
• Frequency division duplexing uses two radio channel
– Forward channel: base station to mobile user
– Reverse channel: mobile user to base station
13
Paging Systems
• Conventional paging system send brief messages to a
subscriber
• Modern paging system: news headline, stock quotations, faxes,
etc.
• Simultaneously broadcast paging message from each base
station (simulcasting)
• Large transmission power to cover wide area.
17
Cellular Technology: Evolution
First generation:
Based on analog technology, uses a single base station to
communicate with a single portable terminal.(e.g., Advance Mobile
Phone Services - AMPS)
Second generation:
Based on digital modulation and advanced call processing
capabilities . (e.g., Global System for Mobile - GSM , IS-95 and
Cordless Telephone - CT2).
Third generation:
To provide a single set of standards that can meet a wide range of
wireless applications (Multimedia) and provide universal access
throughout the world.(e.g., WCDMA, CDMA-2000, etc.)
Fourth generation:
To enable usage over IP platform – packet switching based (e.g.,
Long Term Evolution-Advanced (LTE-A), Mobile WiMAX)
18
Source : Wireless Communications: Principles and Practice, Theodore S. Rappaport,
19
pp10.
Timing diagram illustrating how a call to a mobile user initiated by a landline subscriber is
established.
Source : Wireless Communications: Principles and Practice, Theodore S. Rappaport, pp16.
20
Timing diagram illustrating how a call initiated by a mobile is established
Source : Wireless Communications: Principles and Practice, Theodore S. Rappaport, pp17.
21
WIRELESS COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY Dr. Pinku Ranjan
22
WIRELESS COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY Dr. Pinku Ranjan
23
WIRELESS COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY Dr. Pinku Ranjan
Cellular Concept
• used by service providers to improve the efficiency of a cellular
network and to serve millions of subscribers using a limited radio
spectrum
ABV-IIITM GWALIOR
24
WIRELESS COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY Dr. Pinku Ranjan
Frequency Reuse
• The design process of selecting and allocating
channel groups for all of the cellular base
stations within a system is called frequency
ABV-IIITM GWALIOR
Frequency Reuse
Hexagonal cell shape is conceptual & is a simplistic model of radio coverage for
each base station.
As the radiation from antenna is circular, thus there is fading on the edges of
triangle & Square.
ABV-IIITM GWALIOR
27
WIRELESS COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY Dr. Pinku Ranjan
Frequency Reuse
The design process of selecting & allocating channel groups for all the cellular
base stations with in a system is called Frequency Reuse or Frequency
Planning.
Frequency Reuse Distance : Minimum distance b/w co-channel cells required
to keep co-channel interference below certain threshold.
ABV-IIITM GWALIOR
Frequency Reuse factor of a cellular system is = 1/N (since each cell within a
cluster is only assigned 1/N of total available channels in the system)
N = Cluster size is given by : N = i2 + j2 + i.j (i & j are integers)
For i=1, j=1, then N = 3. i.e. one cluster has 3 cells.
N may be = 1, 3, 4, 7, 9, 12, 13, 16, 19 etc.
d = distance b/w centre of two adjacent cells, R = Radius of cell
D = Minimum distance b/w centre of cells that use same channels or
frequency band (co-channels)
Frequency reuse distance: D2 = 3R2 (i2 + j2 + i.j)
D2 = 3R2 .N
D = (3N)1/2. R or D/R = (3N)1/2
As d = 31/2 .R D/d = (N)1/2 30
WIRELESS COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY Dr. Pinku Ranjan
Locating co-channel Cell
To find the nearest co-channel neighbors of a particular cell, one must do the
following:
available channels
In most of the upcoming networks, frequency reuse
factor is 1.
32
ABV-IIITM GWALIOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONProblem
TECHNOLOGY Dr. Pinku Ranjan
33
Channel Assignment Strategies (CAS)
• Frequency reuse scheme
– increases capacity
– minimize interference
35
WIRELESS COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY Dr. Pinku Ranjan
Dynamic Channel Assignment (DCA)
• Voice channels are not allocated to different cells permanently.
• Each time a call request is made, the BS request a channel
from the MSC.
ABV-IIITM GWALIOR
In this case, BSC controlling the cell makes the decision to perform
handover.
40
WIRELESS COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY Dr. Pinku Ranjan
Types of Handoff
2) Inter-cell-Intra BSC Handover :
The subscriber moves from cell1 to cell 2 but within BSC.
In this case, the handover process is carried out by the BSC.
Traffic connection with cell 1 is released when the connection with cell 2 is
ABV-IIITM GWALIOR
setup successfully.
41
WIRELESS COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY Dr. Pinku Ranjan
Types of Handoff
3) Inter-cell-Inter BSC Handover :
The subscriber moves from cell1 to cell 2 which is served by another BSC.
In this case, handover
process is carried out by
ABV-IIITM GWALIOR
42
WIRELESS COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY Dr. Pinku Ranjan
Types of Handoff
4) Inter MSC Handover :
The subscriber moves from cell1 to cell 2 which is served by another MSC.
In this case, handover
process is carried out by
ABV-IIITM GWALIOR
the GMSC.
Traffic connection
with the first BTS-BSC-MSC
is released when the
connection with the new
BTS-BSC-MSC is setup
successfully.
43
WIRELESS COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY Dr. Pinku Ranjan
Classification of Handoff
Handoff can be classified as:
1) Hard Handoff
2) Soft Handoff
1) Hard Handoff :
ABV-IIITM GWALIOR
44
WIRELESS COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY Dr. Pinku Ranjan
Classification of Handoff
2) Soft Handoff :
Also known as Make Before Break.
It is one in which the channel in the source cell is retained & used for a
while in parallel with the channel in target cell.
Thus the connection to the target is established before the connection to
ABV-IIITM GWALIOR
45
WIRELESS COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY Dr. Pinku Ranjan
Strategies of Handoff
1) Network Assisted Handoff
2) Mobile Assisted Handoff
1) Network Assisted Handoff :
Used by 1G Analog cellular system.
ABV-IIITM GWALIOR
46
WIRELESS COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY Dr. Pinku Ranjan
Strategies of Handoff
2) Mobile Assisted Handoff : (MAHO)
In this Handoff, every Mobile station measures the received power from
surrounding base stations & continuously reports the result to serving base
station.
ABV-IIITM GWALIOR
A handoff is initiated when the power received from a base station of the
neighboring cell begin to exceed the power received from current base
station by the certain level or for a certain period of time.
MAHO method enables the calls to be handed over b/w the base station at a
much faster rate than 1G system.
Since handoff measurements are made by each mobile & the MSC no longer
constantly monitors signal strength, therefore burden on the MSC is reduced.
MAHO is particularly suited for micro-cellular environment where handoffs
are more frequently.
47
WIRELESS COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY Dr. Pinku Ranjan
Here some of the channels of total available channels is reserved for handoff
request from on-going calls which may be handed-off into the cell.
Guard channels however offer efficient spectrum utilization when dynamic
ABV-IIITM GWALIOR
48
WIRELESS COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY Dr. Pinku Ranjan
Practical Handoff Considerations
• Problems occur because of a large range of mobile velocities
– pedestrian vs. vehicle user
– A pedestrian never requires handoff during the call, but if high speed user
passes constantly b/w very small cells, MSC gets burdened quickly.
ABV-IIITM GWALIOR
49
WIRELESS COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY Dr. Pinku Ranjan
Umbrella Cells
ABV-IIITM GWALIOR
51
Interference & System Capacity
Source of interference :
Another mobile in the same cell.
A call in progress in a neighboring cell.
Other base stations operating in the same frequency band.
Any non-cellular system which inadvertently leaks energy into cellular
frequency band.
WIRELESS COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY Dr. Pinku Ranjan
Effects of Interference
• Interference in voice channels causes
– Crosstalk
ABV-IIITM GWALIOR
– Noise in background
• Interference in control channels causes
– Error in digital signaling, which causes
• Missed calls
• Blocked calls
• Dropped calls
53
Interference & System Capacity
Co-Channel Interference & System Capacity :
Frequency reuse implies that in a given coverage area there are several cells
that use the same set of frequencies. These cells are called Co-Channel cells &
interference b/w signals from these cells is called Co-Channel Interference.
Unlike, thermal noise which can be overcome by increasing the SNR (signal-
to-noise ratio), Co-Channel interference can not be combated by simply
increasing the carrier power of a transmitter, because an increase in carrier
transmit power increases the interference to neighboring co-channel cells.
To reduce co-channel interference, co-channel cells must be physically
separated by a minimum distance to provide sufficient isolation due to
propagation.
R Radius of a cell
D distance b/w centers of the nearest
co-channel cells.
Therefore by increasing the ratio D/R, separation
b/w co-channel cells relative to the coverage distance of a cell is increased.
Thus interference is reduced.
Interference & System Capacity
Q Co-Channel Reuse ratio, is related to cluster size shown in table. For
Hexagonal geometry
Table Source : Wireless Communications: Principles and Practice, Theodore S. Rappaport, pp 69.
A small value of Q provides larger capacity, Since the cluster size N is small.
A large value of Q improves the Transmission Quality, Due to smaller level
of co-channel interference.
Therefore a Trade-off must be made b/w these two objectives in actual
cellular design.
Interference & System Capacity
Let io be the number of co-channel interfering cells.
Then, the signal-to-interference ratio (S/I or SIR) for a mobile receiver which
monitors a forward channel can be expressed as:
where S is the desired signal power from the desired base station & I is the
interference power caused by the ith interfering co-channel cell base station.
Average Power Received Pr at a distance d from the transmitting antenna is
approximated by:
where Po is the power received at a close-in reference point in the far field
region of the antenna at a small distance do from the transmitting antenna & n
is the path loss exponent.
Interference & System Capacity
Now consider the forward link where the desired signal is the serving base
station & where the interference is due to co-channel base station.
If Di is the distance of the
ith interfere from the mobile,
the received power at a given
mobile due to the ith interfering
cell will be proportional to
(Di)-n .
When transmit power of each
base station is equal & the path
Loss exponent is the same
throughout the coverage area,
S/I for a mobile can be approximated as:
---------(A)
Source : Wireless Communications: Principles and
Practice, Theodore S. Rappaport, pp 71.
Interference & System Capacity
If the interfering base stations are equidistant from the desired base station &
if this distance is equal to the distance D b/w cell centers, then
S/I relates to the cluster size N, which in turns determine the capacity of the
system. From equation C= M.K.N.
For US, AMPS cellular system which uses FM & 30 kHz channels, subjective
tests indicate that sufficient voice quality is provided when S/I is greater than or
equal to 18dB.
In order to meet this requirement, the cluster size N should be at least 6.49
(=7), assuming path loss exponent n=4.
For a seven cell cluster, with the mobile unit at the cell boundary, the mobile is
a distance D-R from the two nearest co-channel interfering cell & is exactly
D+R/2, D, D-R/2 and D+R from the other interfering cells in the first tier.
S/I ratio for the worst case can be closely approximated as (n=4)
Interference & System Capacity
-------(B)
For N=7, the co-channel reuse ratio Q is 4.6 and the worst case S/I is
approximated as 49.56 (17dB) using equation (B), where as an exact solution
using equation (A) yields 17.8dB. Hence for a seven-cell cluster, the S/I ratio is
slightly less than 18dB for the worst case. To design the cellular system,
WIRELESS COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY Dr. Pinku Ranjan
Problem
ABV-IIITM GWALIOR
61
WIRELESS COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY Dr. Pinku Ranjan
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1011 121314
freq
2
ABV-IIITM GWALIOR
B9
4 5
G 11 C 12
1
A8
6 7
F 13 D14
3
E10
62
WIRELESS COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY Dr. Pinku Ranjan
Learning Objectives
• Concept of Trunking
ABV-IIITM GWALIOR
63
WIRELESS COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY Dr. Pinku Ranjan
64
WIRELESS COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY Dr. Pinku Ranjan
Key Definitions
• Setup Time: Time required to allocate a radio channel to a
requesting user
• Blocked Call: Call which cannot be completed at the time of
request, due to congestion(lost call)
ABV-IIITM GWALIOR
65
WIRELESS COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY Dr. Pinku Ranjan
Erlang-a unit of traffic
• The fundamentals of trunking theory were developed by Erlang, a
Danish mathematician, the unit bears his name.
• An Erlang is a unit of telecommunications traffic measurement.
ABV-IIITM GWALIOR
66
WIRELESS COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY Dr. Pinku Ranjan
follows:
67
WIRELESS COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY Dr. Pinku Ranjan
Traffic Concepts
• Traffic Intensity offered by each user(Au): Equals average call arrival
rate multiplied by the holding time(service time)
Au=λH(Erlangs)
ABV-IIITM GWALIOR
68
WIRELESS COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY Dr. Pinku Ranjan
Trunking & Grade of Service
• In a TRS, when a particular user requests service and all the
available radio channels are already in use , the user is blocked or
denied access to the system. In some systems a queue may be used
ABV-IIITM GWALIOR
69
WIRELESS COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY Dr. Pinku Ranjan
70
WIRELESS COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY Dr. Pinku Ranjan
• The user does not receive service, but is free to try again later
71
WIRELESS COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY Dr. Pinku Ranjan
– Call requests are memory less ,implying that all users, including blocked users,
may request a channel at any time
– All free channels are fully available for servicing calls until all channels are
occupied
– The probability of a user occupying a channel(called service time) is
exponentially distributed. Longer calls are less likely to happen
– There are a finite number of channels available in the trunking pool.
– Inter-arrival times of call requests are independent of each other
72
WIRELESS COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY Dr. Pinku Ranjan
73
WIRELESS COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY Dr. Pinku Ranjan
Erlang B
ABV-IIITM GWALIOR
Example 3.4
• How many users can be supported for 0.5% blocking probability for
the following number of trunked channels in a BCC system? (a) 5,
(b) 10,(c)=20. Assumed that each user generates 0.1 Erlangs of
traffic.
ABV-IIITM GWALIOR
• Solution
• Given C=5, GOS=0.005, Au=0.1,
From graph/Table using C=5 and GOS=0.005,A=1.13
Total Number of users U=A/Au=1.13/0.1=11 users
• Given C=10, GOS=0.005, Au=0.1,
From graph/Table using C=5 and GOS=0.005,A=3.96
Total Number of users U=A/Au=3.96/0.1=39 users
• Given C=20, GOS=0.005, Au=0.1,
From graph/Table using C=20 and GOS=0.005,A=11.10
Total Number of users U=A/Au=11.10/0.1=110 users
75
WIRELESS COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY Dr. Pinku Ranjan
equal to 60.
• Solution 1:
System is an Erlang B
Au = 0.2 Erlangs
Pr [Blocking] = 0.001
C = 60 Channels
From the Erlang B figure, we see that
A ≈ 40 Erlangs
Therefore U=A/Au=40/0.02=2000users.
77
WIRELESS COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY Dr. Pinku Ranjan
Blocked Call Delayed(BCD) Systems
• Queues are used to hold call requests that are initially blocked
• When a user attempts a call and a channel is not immediately
available, the call request may be delayed until a channel becomes
ABV-IIITM GWALIOR
available
• Mathematical modeling of such systems is done by Erlang C formula
• The Erlang C model is based on following assumptions :
• Similar to those of Erlang B
• Additionally, if offered call cannot be assigned a channel, it is placed
in a queue of infinite length
• Each call is then serviced in the order of its arrival
78
WIRELESS COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY Dr. Pinku Ranjan
79
WIRELESS COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY Dr. Pinku Ranjan
Erlang C
ABV-IIITM GWALIOR
• Mathematically;
Pr[delay>t] = Pr [delay>0] Pr [delay>t| delay>0]
• Where P[delay>t| delay>0]= e(-(C-A)t/H)
Pr[delay>t] = Pr [delay>0] e(-(C-A)t/H)
– where C = total number of channels, t =delay time of interest, H=average
duration of call
81
WIRELESS COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY Dr. Pinku Ranjan
Trunking Efficiency
• Trunking efficiency is a measure of the number of users which can
be offered a particular GOS with a particular configuration of fixed
channels.
• The way in which channels are grouped can substantially alter the
ABV-IIITM GWALIOR
82
Improving Coverage & Capacity in Cellular system
As number of users increases, number of channel assigned to a cell become insufficient to
support large number of users. Therefore Cellular design techniques are required.
The cellular design techniques which are required to provide more channels per unit
coverage area are:
1) Cell Splitting
2) Sectoring
3) Microcell Zone Concept
1) Cell Splitting :
The process of subdividing a congested cell into smaller
cells, each with its own base station & a corresponding
reduction in antenna height & transmitted power.
Cell splitting Reduces the transmitted power.
The original base station A is surrounded by 6 new microcell.
The smallest cells are added as to preserve the frequency reuse plan. Now G is placed
halfway b/w the 2 larger stations utilizing same channel set G.
Cell splitting increases the capacity of a cellular system:
• It increases the number of times that channel are reused. By defining new cells which
have a smaller radius than original cells & by installing smaller cell.
•Due to additional number of channels per unit area.
Figure Source : Wireless Communications: Principles and Practice, Theodore S. Rappaport, pp 87.
WIRELESS COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY Dr. Pinku Ranjan
Improving Coverage & Capacity in Cellular system
Area of bigger cell = A o = πR2
Area of smaller cell = AN = π (R/2)2 = πR2/4
4 AN = A o or AN = A o /4
Therefore New Area is ¼ of the older area.
ABV-IIITM GWALIOR
84
Source : Wireless Communications: Principles and Practice, Theodore S. Rappaport, pp 89.
WIRELESS COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY Dr. Pinku Ranjan
Improving Coverage & Capacity in Cellular system
As New Area is ¼ of the older area (now one bigger cell include
approximately 4 smaller cell), therefore the capacity of system is increased
by 4 times.
Before Cell splitting :
Total BW available = 25MHz
ABV-IIITM GWALIOR
The base station simply switches the channel to a different zone site.
Advantages:
1)Interference is reduced, as a given channel is active only in the particular
zone in which mobile is travelling.
2) Increase in capacity, without degradation in trunking efficiency caused by
sectoring.
3) While the cell maintains a particular coverage radius, the co-channel
interference in the cellular system is reduced since a large central base
station is replaced by several low powered transmitters on the edges of the
cell.
4)Decreased co-channel interference improves the signal quality.