FFS Guide

FAO Manual Part I, II, III Prove ARRI impaginato 16/02/12 19.
10 Pagina 1
Farmer Field School

Implementation Guide
FARM FORESTRY AND

LIVELIHOOD DEVELOPMENT
FAO Manual Part I, II, III Prove ARRI impaginato 16/02/12 19.10 Pagina 2
Farmer Field School

Implementation Guide
FARM FORESTRY AND

This guide is based on the experience gained from the Intensified Social Forestry
Project (ISFP) in Semi Arid Areas in Kenya, financed by Japan International
Cooperation Agency (JICA) and implemented by the Kenya Forest Service.
The designations employed and the presentation of material in this publication

do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food
and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) and the Japan
International Cooperation Agency (JICA) concerning the legal or development
status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the
delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The views expressed in this information
product are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of FAO,
JICA or KFS.
All rights reserved. Reproduction and dissemination of material in this publication

for educational or other non commercial purposes are authorized without any
prior written permission from the copyright holders provided the source is fully
acknowledged. Reproduction of material in this information product for resale or
other commercial purposes is prohibited without written permission of the
copyright holders. Applications for such permission should be addressed to FAO.
FAO, JICA, and KFS 2011

Principal Authors:
Takayuki Hagiwara, Natural Resources Management Officer, FAO
Investment Centre
Shinji Ogawa, Farmer Field School Specialist, Former ISFP JICA Expert
Patrick M. Kariuki, Former ISFP Project Manager, Kenya Forest Service
Jane N. Ndeti, Former ISFP Assistant Project Manager, Kenya Forest Service
James M. Kimondo, Former ISFP Co Manager, Kenya Forest Research Institute
Reviewed by:
Arnoud Braun, Director at the Farmer Field School Foundation
Deborah Duveskog, FFS Specialist
Godrick Khisa, FFS Specialist
Roland van Asch, Agricultural Economist
Contact information:
Director, Investment Centre Division
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Viale delle Terme di Caracalla
00153 Rome, Italy
E mail: Investment Centre@fao.org
www.fao.org
www.fao.org/investment
Office of Public Relations

Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA)
Nibancho Center Building 5 25,
Niban cho, Chiyoda ku, Tokyo, Japan 102 8012
E mail: jicagap opinion@jica.go.jp
www.jica.go.jp/english/index.html
Director, Kenya Forest Service (KFS)

KFS Headquarters in Karura, Off Kiambu Road, Opposite CID headquarters
P.O. Box 30513 00100 Nairobi, Kenya
E mail: director@kenyaforestservice.org
www.kenyaforestservice.org
6
Intensified Social Forestry Project

Staff Members
Project Management 11. Charles M. Makau

1. Patrick M. Kariuki, 12. Remmy Manzi
Project Manager 13. Charles Kavithi
2. Jane N. Ndeti, Assistant 14. Paul Musembi
Project Manager 15. J. N. Muiruri
16. Benedict Mainga
District Forest Officers (DFOs) 17. Joseph Ndirangu
1. Paul N. Karanja 18. Christopher A. Kapula
2. James R. Chomba 19. Maina Karimi
3. Joseph M. Njigoya
KEFRI
Assistant District Forest Officer 1. James M. Kimondo, Former
1. Wellington Muli Ndaka KEFRI Kitui Centre DIrector
2. George K. Nduati 2. M. T. E. Mbuvi, KEFRI Kitui
3. Kenneth M. Riungu Centre DIrector
Divisional Forest Extension Officers JICA Experts

1. Elvis K. Fondo 1. Yuichi Sato, Chief Technical
2. Peter O. Aloo Advisor (2004 2006)
3. Kariuki Kooro 2. Shinji Ogawa, Social Forestry
4. Theophilus M. Muasya Extension (2004 2007)
5. Christopher Maina 3. Takanobu Nawashiro, Project
6. Silas Mutea Coordinator (2004 – 2006)
7. Samuel M. Gachagua 4. Yoshiaki Hata, Chief Technical
8. Phineas Rewa Advisor (2006 2009)
9. Benedict N. Kakuku 5. Shinji Abe, Project Coordinator
10. S.M Mbuko (2006 2009)
Table of contents
Foreword 12
Preface 14
Acknowledgement 16
Introduction 19
The Purpose of the Guide 19
Structure of the Guide 20
The ISFP Experience 20
Use of this Guide in Other Projects 21
After FFS: Integration of FFS with RuralInvest 22
Part I: Key Principles of Farmer Field School 25

What is Farmer Field School? 25
What are the core principles of FFS? 27
How does FFS benefit farmers? 29
How does FFS help development agencies? 31
What are the weaknesses of FFS? 34
Part II: FFS Planning and Management 39

Implementation Structure 39
Programme Cost and Fund Disbursement 42
Curriculum Development 45
Capacity Development 48
Expansion Planning 50
Monitoring and Evaluation 52
Part III: Field Manual for Field Facilitators 59

Implementation Processes 59
Implementation Steps 60
Implementation Calendar 61
Step 1: Ground Working and Promotion 63

Step 2: Group Organization 75
Step 3: Selection of Enterprise and Host Farm 97
Step 4: Selection of Host Farm and Learning Site Preparation 109
Step 5: Farm Enterprise Planning 119
Step 6: Establishment of Enterprise Sites 133

Step 7: LFFS Weekly Session 139
Step 8: Tree Nursery Establishment 161
Step 9: Exchange Visit 171
Step 10: Farmer Facilitator Selection 177
Step 11: Participatory Evaluation 181
Step 12: Field Day 205
Step 13: Preparation of Project Proposals with RuralInvest Module 3 213
Step 14: Graduation 222
Annex 1. Enterprise Catalogue 232
Annex 2. Study Guide 260
Annex 3. Repository of Templates 302

3 1. FFS Session Checklist 1 303
3 2. FFS Session Checklist 2 306
3 3. Mobile Phone Weekly FFS Report 308
3 4. Facilitator’s Monthly Report 309
3 5. Problem Report by Facilitators 310
3 6. Empowerment Process Report 311
3 7. Group Location Map 313
3 8. RuralInvest Module 2 Format 314
3 9. Final Session Report 320
3 9 1. Ballot Box Exercise 321
3 9 2. PCE Analysis 322
3 9 3. Result of Cost Benefit Analysis 324
3 9 4. Result of Self Evaluation Session 325
3 9 5. Result of Way Forward Session 331
3 10. RuralInvest Module 3 Format 333
Annex 4. Example of TOF Programme for Extension Facilitators 345
Annex 5. Example of TOF Programme for Farmer Facilitators 349
Reference and Future Reading 351

10
Abbreviations & Acronyms
AESA Agro Ecosystem Analysis

AfDB African Development Bank
ASAL Arid and Semi Arid Areas
CDA Coast Development Authority
CTA Chief Technical Advisor
DCCF Deputy Chief Conservator of Forests
DFO District Forestry Officer
DFEO Divisional Forestry Extension Officer
DM District Manager
FAO Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
FD Forest Department
FFs Farmer Facilitators
FFS Farmer Field School
FFFS Farm Forestry Field School
GOJ Government of Japan
GOK Government of Kenya
ICIPE International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology
IFAD International Fund for Agricultural Development
IGA Income Generating Activities
ILRI International Livestock Research Institute
IPM Integrated Pest Management
ISFP Intensified Social Forestry Project
JICA Japan International Cooperation Agency
KARI Kenya Agricultural Research Institute
Ksh Kenya Shilling
11
LFFS Livelihood Farmer Field School

M&E Monitoring and Evaluation
MENR Ministry of Environment and Natural Resources
MOA Ministry of Agriculture
MOU Memorandum of Understanding
NFE Non Formal Education
NGO Non Governmental Organization
PC Project Coordinator
PCE Participatory Comparative Experiment
PFO Provincial Forestry Officer
PM&E Participatory M&E
PMU Project Management Unit
PTD Participatory Technology Development
Q&A Question and Answer
SFTP Social Forestry Training Project
SLDP Sustainable Livelihood Development Project
SOFEM Social Forestry Extension Model Development Project
SSIS Small Scale Irrigation System
TCP Technical Cooperation Programme
TOF Training of Facilitators
UNDP United Nations Development Programme
12
Foreword
The Government of Kenya and the Japan International Cooperation

Agency (JICA) have a longstanding partnership for the development of
social forestry in the semi arid areas of Kenya. JICA’s initial assistance started
with the Social Forestry Training Project (SFTP) in 1985 for a period of
12 years. The main focus of the project was to develop tree nursery and tree
planting technologies in the semi arid areas as well as to provide social
forestry training for farmers and government staff. The Social Forestry
Extension Model Development Project (SOFEM) started in 1997, following
SFTP’s completion. It aimed to develop an extension model for the
promotion of farm forestry among local residents in semi arid areas
of Kenya. These two projects were implemented jointly by the Kenya Forest
Research Institute (KEFRI) and JICA.
The Intensified Social Forestry Project in semi arid areas of Kenya (ISFP)
commenced in 2004 for a period of five years. The project consolidated
the main lessons learned and key technologies acquired in the previous
two projects. Although the previous two projects achieved their project
goals, both could not reach a substantial number of farmers; for example,
SOFEM worked with only 98 farmers. ISFP was tasked to cover a wider
geographic area and a greater number of beneficiaries as well as
organize delivery of farm forestry extension services whilst empowering
farmers and improving extension service quality. The main purpose of ISFP
thus became to intensify social forestry activities in the target areas. The
Kenya Forest Service (KFS), the key institution responsible for forest
administration and management, became the main implementer of the
project, with close collaboration of KEFRI.
13
Building on past experiences, ISFP brought a new dimension to forestry

extension and created a systematic extension management system. With
assistance from the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
(FAO), the project introduced the Farmer Field School (FFS) methodology,
which had previously mainly been applied for agricultural extension service
delivery in the country. It customised the approach to farm forestry, leading
to the Farm Forestry Field School (FFFS) approach. Currently this approach
has become the standard method for farm forestry extension in KFS and is
widely used in other districts and projects in Kenya. With help from FAO, KFS
has further developed the Livelihood Farmer Field School, which was based
on the FFFS. It is anticipated that this guide will contribute to improved
extension service delivery among project managers and field workers who
are facilitating farmers’ empowerment processes through the FFS approach.
D. K. Mbugua
Director, Kenya Forest Service
14
Preface
This document is based on the manual prepared for the Intensified Social
Forestry Project (ISFP) in semi arid areas of Kenya (2004 – 2009) under the
technical cooperation programme of Japan International Cooperation
Agency (JICA) to the Government of Kenya, more specifically to Kenya
Forest Service (KFS). From the onset of the project, the FAO Investment
Centre was involved in designing of implementing Farm Forestry Farmer
Field Schools and compilation of the manual. The cooperation between
JICA and FAO produced not only the successful results of the ISFP, but also
the preparation of the Support to Community Based Farm Forestry
Enterprises Project funded by the Japan Social Development Fund being
managed by the World Bank. JICA would like to acknowledge the valuable
input of all the KFS staff involved in the ISFP and five JICA experts who
participated in the project. JICA would also like to take this opportunity to
thank the FAO Investment Centre for its efforts to support the ISFP and
making this publication possible. JICA hopes that this guide will improve the
rural livelihoods of the people of Kenya, and elsewhere.
Masaaki Kato
JICA Representative in Kenya
15
16
Acknowledgment
This publication is the result of the work of KFS staff, KEFRI Kitui Centre staff,
Farmer Facilitators and JICA experts over the period 2004 2009 as well as
staff members for the Sustainable Livelihood Development Project funded
by FAO. Valuable advice and support to FFS facilitation training at the early
stage of the ISFP was provided during that period by Mr Titus Mutinda, FFS
master trainer at the Kitui District Office of the Ministry of Agriculture, and Ms
Deborah Duveskog, FAO Kenya.
Special thanks to Mr Aidan Gulliver (Senior Economist at the FAO Investment

Centre) who provided support for writing and reviewing the sections on
RuralInvest. We appreciate Mr Roland van Asch (Agricultural Economist)
and Ilona deBorhegyi (Information officer at the FAO Investment Centre) for
reviewing and commenting on the draft. Mr Kevin Gallagher (FAO Rep in
Pakistan), Mr Tim Stephens (Agricultural Engineer) and Ms Pamela Pozarny
(Rural Sociologist the FAO Investment Centre) provided insightful comments
and contributed to the editing of the FFFS manual used in the ISFP. Thanks
also to Mr Guy Evers (Africa Service Chief, the FAO Investment Centre) and
Ms Alberta Mascaretti (Agricultural Officer), Ms Astrid Agostini (Economist),
Ms Nada Zvekic (Communication Officer), and David Berk (Intern) of the
FAO Investment Centre who provided continuous support to finalize this
work. Many thanks to Ms Lorella Candido (Book Designer) turned the draft
into a very beautiful book. Finally, JICA’s generous support to the ISFP and
KFS is highly appreciated. This document would not have been completed
without consistent JICA support and funding.
Takayuki Hagiwara
FAO Investment Centre
and
Shinji Ogawa
Farmer Field School Specialist
17
19
Introduction
Background of this Guide
This guide builds on the three previous versions of the Farm Forestry
Field School (FFFS) manual prepared by the Intensified Social Forestry
Project in Semi Arid Areas (ISFP) of Kenya. The manual was first
developed in a workshop setting with the participation of Kenya
Forest Service (KFS) staff members and JICA experts at the onset of
the ISFP in 2004. FAO was involved in the workshop providing
technical assistance to design the FFFS implementation process,
facilitate the workshops and compile workshop outputs into the
manual. The ISFP conducted the manual review twice through
workshops. The KFS field staff members who carried out the FFFS
presented the reality of the field and issues faced by farmers. Such
experience sharing enriched the entire project implementation
process and subsequently this publication. FAO was tasked to finalize
the reviews and was asked to carry out an independent external
review in 2007.
Purpose of the Guide
Earlier versions were developed to assist KFS staff and farmer

facilitators (FFs) in implementing activities of the ISFP in Kenya. The
manual was successfully adopted by KFS and other projects
including the Green Zone Project funded by the African
Development Bank (AfDB). However, the manual was specifically
written for the purpose of the ISFP. It was site specific and did not
incorporate different experiences in other parts of Kenya and other
countries.
20 FARMER FIELD SCHOOLS IMPLEMENTATION GUIDE
This version aims to provide an FFS implementation guide for a wider

audience, especially for project designers and managers as well as
field practitioners who intend to use the FFS platform for extension
support to farm forestry or forestry based livelihood development. In
addition to a basic conceptual framework, it provides the know how
for managing effective FFS extension activities, an overview of FFS
with FAO’s RuralInvest toolkit, and describes a mobile phone based
monitoring system.
Structure of the Guide
This guide includes Part I: Basics of FFS, which introduces key principles
of FFS for an understanding of the foundation of the FFS approach1;
Part II: FFS Planning and Management provides an overview and
examples of how FFS was managed and implemented in the ISFP;
and Part III: Field Guide for FFS Facilitators provides a step by step
description of FFS field implementation. It further includes a sequence
of activities as well as lessons learned in the ISFP. It is expected that this
guide will be first introduced to extension workers in “Training of
Facilitators (TOF)” courses and subsequently used during the FFS
implementation cycle.
Examples of templates for use in the FFS implementation are provided

throughout the document and Annexes.2 These are based on the
actual formats for management and M&E that were used in the ISFP.
1. For further in dept

information, users of
The ISFP Experience
this guide are
strongly encouraged
to visit other FFS
The ISFP project, which ended in March 2009, set up more than 300
resource materials at FFFSs involving approximately 5,000 participants and trained more
the FFSnet Database
(http://www.infobrid than 130 farmer facilitators. All facilitators in the project received FFS
ge.org/ffsnet/) facilitation training and backstopping by FFS master trainers in the
2. Contact country. Adoption rates among FFFS participants of technologies
at Investment
Centre@fao.org for related to farm forestry, including tree nursery, fruit orchard, woodlots
and grafting, appeared to be more than 80 percent (FAO, 2007).
the electric version of
the formats included
in this guide.
Introduction 21
The ISFP experience shows that the dedication and commitment to

farmers of government and field officials Divisional Forestry
Extension Officers (DFEOs), District Forest Officers (DFOs), and Farmer
Facilitators (FFs) – was the crucial factor for project success. The
presence of a well focused and able project management team,
and constant backstopping of the facilitators, also ensured high
quality service delivery and smooth flow of funds. Adequate support
to facilitators also proved crucial in carrying out field work including
timely release of funds for fuel and allowances. Prompt delivery of
learning materials (stationery and host farm inputs) was also essential
in ensuring successful and timely implementation of FFS.
Use of this Guide in Other Projects
The positive experience of the ISFP resulted in the adoption within

Kenya of: the FFS technical platform and the FFFS manual by KFS for
its own extension programme using government budget resources;
the Green Zone Project (AfDB); Support to Community Based Farm
Forestry Enterprise Project in Semi Arid Areas in Kenya (the World
Bank); and Livelihood Farmer Field Schools (LFFS) under the FAO
funded Sustainable Livelihood Development Project (SLDP) in the
Mau Forest Complex. In addition, the EU funded FAO implemented
project on Small Scale Irrigation System (SSIS) Farmer Field Schools in
the Philippines uses the framework and material of this guide. A JICA
supported project in Ethiopia, the Belete Gera Participatory Forest
Management Project, also adopted and implemented the
approach using the same concept and guidelines developed in the
ISFP. The project in Ethiopia received support from KFS and Kenyan
FFS master trainers in carrying out TOF. The experience in Ethiopia and
FAO LFFS shows that the ISFP FFS concept is applicable under a
range of circumstances. However, it also shows that different 3. Project for
contexts may require variation in how the approach is implemented. Increasing Rice Yield
and Productivity
For example, poor accessibility within the project area in Ethiopia through the
sometimes required FFS facilitators to walk for more than 10 hours to Promotion of Small
Scale Irrigation and
visit FFS groups and caused problems of maintaining FFS quality. Integrated Crop
Experiences in Ethiopia and KFS’s other projects confirmed that TOF

Management
Systems in Rainfed
Areas
training and provision of a technical manual to FFS facilitators was

not sufficient. It is clear that any FFS must be backstopped by
experienced FFS facilitators in order to maintain quality.
The experience of the projects described above, and elsewhere that

FFS has been successfully applied, clearly demonstrates the
sustainable benefits that can be achieved through farmer level
capacity building. However, the FFS process also provides a
management tool that can increase the capacity and
responsiveness of the institutions that adopt the approach. This
guide also aims to promote the value of FFS as a management tool
(see details in Part II).
After FFS: Integration of FFS with RuralInvest
The experience of ISFP shows that graduated FFS groups have often
disbanded or become dormant because of a lack of appropriate
follow up activities, even though individually the members continue
to apply technologies that they acquired from the FFSs. A weakness
of FFS has been the lack of an institutional framework to support the
scaling up of these learning experiences to generate substantial
income and improved livelihoods. This weakness was recognized by
KFS which in 2007 requested the FAO Investment Centre to formulate
a proposal for the Japan Social Development Fund. The Centre
proposed the integration of FFS with another FAO product called
“RuralInvest” which consists of a multilingual toolkit package of
training modules and software targeted to assist the design and
management of small and medium rural investment projects.
RuralInvest can provide an institutional framework to support FFS as it

helps groups to identify and properly assess opportunities for
investment and scaling up of FFS experiences. With its two modules,
“Profile” and “Project”, RuralInvest can assist FFS members to
4. see http://
www.fao.org/tc/tci/o examine under the profile module whether the potential of
enterprises that they want to develop will justify the further effort
urrole/ruralinvest/en/
for access to
RuralInvest training required to develop them in detail.4 However, the success of
modules and
software RuralInvest depends upon applicants being able to demonstrate
Introduction 23
that they have ideas which would merit investment. Experiences with
both FFS and RuralInvest suggest that the two tools have great
potential for promoting rural development and would have mutual
complementarities; FFS is a tool which can provide critical technical
and planning inputs that enable RuralInvest proposals to be
developed, while RuralInvest provides a framework for FFS graduates
to overcome FFS’s lack of follow on structure. Based on the
experience gained in FAO’s SLDP in the Mau Forest Complex, this
guide demonstrates how RuralInvest can be used together with FFS.
25
Part I: Key principles of

Farmer Field School
1
What is Farmer Field School?
The FFS approach is an innovative, participatory and interactive

learning approach that emphasizes problem solving and discovery
based learning. FFS aims to build farmers’ capacity to analyze their
production systems, identify problems, test possible solutions, and
eventually encourage the participants to adopt the practices most
suitable to their farming systems (FAO, 2003 c). FFS can also provide
an opportunity for farmers to practice and test/evaluate sustainable
land use technologies, and introduce new technologies through
comparing their conventional technologies developed with their
own tradition and culture.
FFS is usually a time bound activity (generally one agricultural

production cycle or a year), involving a group (commonly 20 30) of
farmers. It is facilitated by extension staff or – increasingly – by farmer
facilitators (FFs). The method emphasizes group observation,
discussion, analysis, presentation, and collective decision making
and actions. The basic component of FFS is setting up of a
Participatory Comparative Experiment (PCE), commonly referred to
as Participatory Technology Development (PTD), whereby the
farmers put the FFS concept into practice. A PCE can be developed
using subjects of agriculture, livestock, forestry, agroforestry,
livelihoods and others.
Presentation of PCE findings by participants is a key activity in the

FFS’s learning process. It encourages participants to present their
findings, experiences and knowledge in front of other FFS members
while defending their opinions on findings and decisions made. Such
process builds self confidence, particularly for women, poor
1
household members, or minority group members. Another key
outcome, although it is not an explicit FFS objective, is the
development of leadership. An FFS must have an appointed group
of leaders composed of a Chairperson, Deputy Chairperson,
Secretary, and Treasurer. In addition, the FFS membership is divided
into four to five sub groups and each sub group has a leader.
Through managing the FFS group and sub groups, these appointed
leaders as well as the rest of the members build up skills of group
management and leadership. Furthermore, FFS encourages
cohesiveness among members and develops team work. Although
FFS is a time bound project activity, many FFS groups continue after
the FFS learning cycle is completed for self motivated study of other
subjects, development of collective marketing of agricultural
produce, and to establish cooperatives.
BOX 1 FFS and Increase of Community Coherency
The communities of the SLDP target area in the Mau Forest

Complex were severely disrupted after post election violence in
2008. Examples of SLDP in the Mau Forest Complex demonstrate
that FFS activities can Increase cohesion of a mixed
membership community including several ethnic groups.
Initially, the project was not able to form FFS groups due to its
policy not to favour particular ethnic groups and its aim to bring
different ethnic groups back together. Different ethnic groups
wanted separate groups composed of members of their own
ethnic group. The project held several meetings with such
communities to convince them to form a group including
people from different ethnic groups. The allocation of
leadership posts was another obstacle after forming the FFS
groups. With perseverance the project can now successfully
demonstrate how FFS can alleviate tension between people
from different ethnic groups.
1
What are the Core Principles of FFS?
The following are the core principles and components of the FFS
approach:
The field is the learning place. Learning takes place in the field,
usually on a host farm where a PCE is established and all learning
sessions are held. Participants observe and learn from the field
work instead of from textbooks and lectures from extension
workers. Improved farm practices must be suitable for the local
context, which is usually influenced by local ecological and socio
economic conditions as well as farmers’ preferences.
Facilitation, not teaching. The role of the facilitator is crucial for
successful learning and empowerment because FFS does not
focus on teaching but on guiding FFS members through the
learning process. To foster the learner centred process, the
facilitator remains in the background, listening attentively and
reflectively, asking questions and encouraging participants to
explore more in the field and present their ideas. The facilitator
must stimulate FFS members to think, observe, analyze and
discover answers by themselves.
Hands-on and discovery-based learning. The process of learning
adheres to principles of adult education and “learning by doing”.
Adults tend not to learn and change behaviour by passive
listening, but as a consequence of experience. Through learning by
doing in a discovery based manner, group members cherish
ownership over their knowledge and gain confidence in what they
have learned.
The farmer as expert. The FFS approach recognizes community
members as the experts within their particular contexts, and
considers indigenous and local knowledge an important source of
information to be used within the FFS learning process. Through the
process, FFS members learn how to improve their own abilities to
observe and analyse problems, and to develop practical and
relevant solutions. The approach inspires members to learn
continuously by exploring and educating themselves on issues and
topics that affect their livelihoods.
Equity and no hierarchy. An FFS is designed for all to participate on
an equal basis. FFS supports no hierarchy between farmers and
1
facilitators, group leaders and ordinary members, diploma holders
and those who do not read and write. All are equal partners in the
FFS learning experience.
Integrated and learner-defined curriculum. The FFS curriculum is
defined by the learners and is unique for each group, though
much of learning enterprises are pre designed under the mandate
of FFS implementing agencies. The basic principle for any FFS is
that all topics must be related to what is important to the group
members and aim to fill their particular gaps in knowledge.
Comparative experiments. Knowledge is gained through practical
experiments where different options are compared with each
other. The trials are regularly observed and analyzed. Issues are
discussed as they occur — in reality. This aspect of the approach
dictates the “duration” of an FFS cycle that has to match the life
cycle of the enterprise being studied, i.e. from “(planted) seed to
(harvested) seed”, or from “egg to egg” in the case of poultry.
Agro-ecosystem analysis. The agro ecosystem analysis (AESA) is
one of the cornerstones of the FFS approach. AESA is practiced by
all FFS members through all stages of FFS cycle. It involves
observation, analysis and presentation for synthesis and discussion.
This activity enhances participants’ analyzing skills as well as their
presentation, thereby improving knowledge based decision
making in addition to their communication capabilities.
Special topics. The focus of special topics is decided on by the
group and plays a central role in FFS. Special topics can cover a
wide range of topics and can be multi sectoral. It is part of the FFS
curriculum and learning experiments. The selection of special
topics should be demand driven, usually addressing wider
livelihood issues. These special topics can also be facilitated by
external resource persons rather than by the FFS group facilitator.
Team building and social animation. Aspects of team building,
group dynamics and social animation are important components
of learning sessions. Through song, dance and drama people share
knowledge and culture, build cohesion, and learn communication
and leadership skills. This also creates a platform for dealing with
difficult subjects such as abuse, gender and HIV/AIDS.
Participatory monitoring and evaluation. While preparing the FFS
curriculum, participants develop a plan for monitoring and
1
evaluating progress to later assess whether they are achieving the
agreed objectives.
How does FFS benefit Farmers?
1. Strengthening observation capability and increasing knowledge

ownership through discovery based learning.
FFS does not rely mainly on information and techniques brought by

extension agents and transferred to farmers. Instead, it aims to
encourage farmers’ systematic observation and informed
decision making based on discovery based learning so that new
knowledge and practices are generated by the farmers
themselves. This process stimulates ownership of the learning
process and ensures local adaptation. The main role of extension
workers is to enhance farmers’ skills in practicing new ideas,
discovering their own solutions, and developing coping strategies
to deal with ever changing situations. Technologies practiced
under FFS usually are site specific and suitable to the farmers who
use them because the FFS participants themselves set up learning
sites and put technologies into practice. As a result, adoption rates
are usually high among FFS members. Transfer of knowledge to
neighbors is also common in FFS since learning results are based on
farmers’ experiences applicable to their neighbors.
2. Building self-confidence and enhancing decision-making

capacity.
FFS is not about transferring and teaching knowledge and

techniques, as it is the case in conventional extension. The FFS
approach empowers farmers in various aspects through
confidence building and decision making exercises. Unlike in other
extension approaches, farmers in the FFS approach are facilitated
to take a lead in learning sessions under a participatory manner.
Every FFS session allocates time for presentation of field
observations followed by group discussion. In addition, participants
1
in FFS are divided into sub groups and discussions among sub
group members are encouraged. These exercises involving
tangible field results usually provide a foundation for participants to
“own” the learning process, build their confidence and personal
skills, and thus become empowered in their farming activities and
collaborating with other farmers in finding solutions.
3. Minimizing risks in experimenting with new practices.
It is risky for subsistence farmers to switch from their conventional

land use practices to new ones based only on information or short
training sessions provided by extension workers. They simply cannot
afford crop failures when trying out new systems.
FFS provides farmers with the opportunity to try out new practices
on a group farm where risks are minimal, and potential losses would
be shared by group members. Learning sites are usually very small
in size; sufficient only to test and compare new technologies and
farmers’ own conventional farmers’ practices. They need only to
contribute a half day per week of their time to participate in FFS,
while they can continue working on their own food crops using their
conventional farming methods. FFS does not promote new
methods in isolation from regular farmer practices; rather it provides
an opportunity for the participants to test and compare
alternatives in a relatively risk free environment with measurable
figures for discussion and debate among participating farmers. FFS
is therefore a less risky approach for subsistence farmers compared
to most conventional extension methods.
4. Changing deep-rooted beliefs and practices.
Farmers have a wealth of knowledge, which is usually based on their

experience. It is also true that they are sometime based on
misconceptions. Wrong ideas or false deep rooted impressions
cannot be easily swept aside through short term training or field visits.
FFS provides an analytical structure and season long regular

interactions with the field, facilitators, and other FFS members, which
1
enables participants to learn firsthand the benefits of testing new
technologies in PCE and to understand the behaviour of introduced
crops. The FFS experience can as well assist them to recognize
misunderstandings and avoid errors in farming practices or beliefs.
5. Developing problem-solving capabilities.
A farmer is an agricultural entrepreneur who has to deal with

constantly changing natural and socio economic circumstances. To
be successful, a farmer needs a range of skills including natural
resource management, accounting, marketing, negotiation,
problem solving and conflict management. Without such
capacities, farmers may be unprepared for uncertain events caused
by political and economic unrests as well as climate change.
Any one off training event cannot provide solutions for all farm
related problems, nor can it provide the broad range of skills needed
to support improved productivity at the farm level. However, FFSs
offer integrated learning opportunities for a period of one year in
which participating farmers acquire problem solving capabilities
that can encourage pro active behavior and positive attitude
towards an often uncertain future.
How does FFS help Development Agencies?
The following are some of the reasons for development agencies to

incorporate FFS into extension services.
1. Structured implementation process.
FFS provides a structured extension platform, which makes

implementation and M&E easier as listed below:
Regular meeting days. Regular group meeting days make FFS
easier to monitor. The management team knows when and
where FFSs are carried out. This allows random checking by
managers, whose visits are not announced in advance.
1
Fixed timetable and planned programme. Every FFS session is
conducted according to a fixed timetable and each activity
planned during the pervious group meeting and agreed among
members. This simple standard session format simplifies planning
and preparation for future sessions.
Fixed annual and event schedule. The annual FFS programme
must be fully synchronized with rainfall and other environmental
patterns, with clear benchmarks and key events including
exchange visits, field days and graduation.
Standardized FFS inputs and budget. Inputs for FFS including
learning materials, costs for events and allowances for facilitators
can be standardised under a project. The budget for each FFS
will vary depending on the length of the FFS implementation
period, material to be provided, travel distance of facilitators,
and reporting required from farmers.
2. Facilitating inter-sectoral collaboration.
FFS requires collaboration among various government ministries

for the delivery of ”special topics”, which cover not only
agriculture, livestock and agroforestry related issues, but also life
skills such as prevention of HIV/AIDS, cooking, nutrition, and other
requests according to demand from the FFS participants. Special
topics, which deal with multi sectoral issues, are a crucial
element to keep the group interested and active. This
arrangement requires FFS facilitators to actively search for help
from other government agencies or NGOs which, as a result,
makes FFS a multi sectoral platform.
3. Empowering extension officers.
FFS empowers both farmers and extension officers. Through FFS

implementation extension officers must adapt their normal role of
lecturers to become facilitators. An equal communication platform
requires them to change their attitude to listen more to the farmers.
Clearly identified working targets and a structured approach
ensures they are better prepared and more disciplined. Frequent
communication socializes them to become local coordinators.
1
In addition, tangible field results and respect from farmers increases
their self confidence and job satisfaction.
4. Expanding results effectively.
An overview of the expansion strategy of the FFS approach is

illustrated in Figure 1. FFS employs two types of facilitators;
(i) extension facilitators, who are recruited by the government or
projects and have received the required training as facilitators, and
(ii) farmer facilitators (FFs), who are FFS graduates.
Expansion of FFS is usually constrained by the limited number of

government and/or project paid extension workers who normally
also have other duties to perform. However, the selection and
training of suitable farmer candidates during the initial period of
“extension led FFS” can provide additional locally available human
resources for future expansion of FFS (for details see Part II).
Figure 1. FFS Expansion Strategy

1
5. Joining the global FFS network
By 2009, the FFS approach has been practiced in more than 92

countries (Arnoud Braun, personal communication). A large
knowledge base on the approach is available in the form of
reports, manuals, guides, videos, podcasts and case studies
(largely available in the FFSnet database5). This allows new FFS
projects to benefit from a wide range of project and country
experience, and avoid previous pitfalls. However, the FFS
approach remains to be learned in a training context with the
presence of experienced (master) trainers – it cannot be (easily)
learnt simply by reading resource materials.
What are the Weaknesses of FFS?
There are several key planning and managerial issues in

implementing FFS. The FFS planners must address the following points
in preparing an FFS programme.
1. FSS requires having a group of experienced FFS facilitators.
Experience shows that FFS must be implemented according to its

key principles and can not be applied simply on the basis of
knowledge of extension methods. FFS facilitators must have at least
two weeks of intensive FFS facilitation training TOF delivered by
experienced FFS master trainers, which must be followed up with
continuous backstopping to maintain the quality of FFS during field
application by the trained facilitators.
What happens in an area where there are no master trainers? The

lack of master trainers is the major bottleneck in many FFS
programmes, and undermines the quality of FFS. Contracting
master trainers from another country or area may be expensive,
but there are few options if FFS is to be correctly implemented. The
JICA supported FFS project in Ethiopia arranged for four master
trainers from Kenya to visit the project and conduct the TOF. In the
5. www.infobridge.org/
ffsnet/ Philippines, the Philippine Rice Research Institute (PhilRice) at
1
Nueva Ecija conducts a season long FFS training course. Every year
it produces about 40 to 50 experts, who promote FFS in rice
production. However, the trainees stay at the institution for the
entire one crop (rice production) period and the cost of such
training is high.
In order to cope with the shortage of master trainers in Kenya, FAO

provides a master trainers course with experienced FFS facilitators.
The cost of this programme is approximately USD 35,000 for 13
trainees over a period of 7 months. Each month these trainees
leave their regular work and are trained for a period of one week
including field exercises.6
2. Appropriate fund release mechanism and effective logistics.
FFS is carried out according to the crop cycle, and must start
according to the planting season. An FFS programme must be
carefully planned to ensure that study material and inputs for the
particular FFS activities can be delivered in a timely manner. An
appropriate fund release mechanism is also essential to enable
timely procurement and delivery of materials and inputs. Methods
for procurement of materials in bulk may need to be supplemented
by a cash account (and appropriate procurement processes) for
each FFS for small scale expenditure of essential items. Timely
payment of allowances to facilitators is important to ensure they
remain motivated and are able to purchase fuel for their
motorcycles.
Many unperformed FFS programmes are found under government

programmes that suffer from slow bureaucratic procedures that
delay procurement of learning material and payment of
allowances to facilitators.
3. Quality Control.
FFS requires effective backstopping by experienced FFS facilitators 6. For more detail
to maintain the quality of FFS. In Ethiopia, many FFS sites were information, contact
at Investment
inaccessible by car and in some cases facilitators were required to Centre@fao.org
1
walk for more 10 hours to reach remote FFS locations. As a result,
FFS backstopping became less frequent and the quality of the FFS
process was affected.
4. Cost.
The cost per FFS varies according to the duration of the crop cycle,
accessibility of FFS sites and the allowances paid to facilitators.
Typically the cost ranges from USD 1,000 to 1,700 per FFS per year.
(see details in Part II). This is equivalent to USD 40 to 70 per person
for one FFS cycle assuming 25 members per FFS. In addition,
experience in implementing FFS shows that a monthly meeting
with facilitators, experience sharing workshops, and exposure of
facilitators to new technologies are essential to maintain a
dynamic relationship between the project management,
facilitators and FFS members. Such activities are important to
successful FFS outcomes. If budget is a constraint, it is preferable
to reduce the scope of the programme (i.e. the number of target
FFSs) than to compromise on FFS quality.
5. Monitoring of FFS.
Generally the monitoring of extension activities is difficult to

conduct. However, the FFS platform allows project management
to undertake random spot check monitoring because of the fixed
date and place of FFS activities. Nevertheless, effective
performance monitoring of all FFSs under a programme can be a
challenge. Traditional methods which require facilitators to
provide weekly or monthly reports on FFS performance, have
proved to be difficult to implement effectively; facilitators do not
provide timely reports and/or reports are lost in somewhere along
the chain. Such methods do not effectively monitor the
performance of the facilitators themselves and do not easily allow
for timely project management intervention if required. The use of
phone communications with FFS chairpersons has improved the
detection of management issues, but it tends to be costly.
1
A promising innovation being tested on a number of FAO projects
is the use mobile phones as a monitoring tool. The system is
designed in such a way that FFS data are sent by mobile phone to
a web based database which automatically processes and
aggregates the summary data for presentation through the
project’s website (for details see Part II).
39
Part II: FFS Planning

and Management
2
Implementation Structure
Setting up a Management Structure
Project management of FFS should strive to promote open,

transparent and democratic processes that strongly support the
participation and capacity building of government staff and
beneficiaries in the implementation process. Management of FFS
should preferably be decentralized to the local level with an
appropriate headquarters (HQ) project management structure
providing administrative support. However, any FFS project must have
a field coordinator assigned to the target area to provide
backstopping and technical support needed to maintain the
quality of FFS.
For the ISFP, a project management unit (PMU) was set up in KFS HQ
to handle administrative matters including preparation of plans,
allocation of budget, provision of technical support and capacity
building. However, management responsibility for FFS implementation
was assigned to DFOs of the three project districts.
The FAO LFFS in KFS Kericho district does not have a PMU at the HQ;
instead it has a project coordinator at KFS HQ to provide
administrative support and liaise with FAO, while it has a field
coordinator (DFO) and an assistant field coordinator at district level to
oversee the performance of LFFS and provide backstopping.
2
Typical Structure for Implementing FFS
PMU
Project Manager
HQ
Level
FFS Specialist
Provincial
District Field Coordinator
Level
FFS Facilitators
Municipal
Village
Level
FFS FFS FFS
Identification of Facilitators
FFS has a long history in many countries, and identification of

experienced facilitators may not be an issue in such countries.
However, even in the Philippines where there are many experienced
facilitators available, identification of sufficient number of facilitators
can be a major issue if a project must work with many FFSs over a
short period of time. FFS programme planning must start by
identifying facilitators, determining their availability to be assigned to
each target community, and then assessing their ability to plan a
capacity building programme.
Setting up Logistics
Key issues in FFS logistics are: (i) transportation of facilitators; (ii) timely
delivery of learning material to FFSs; and (iii) payment of facilitator
allowances. As both the ISFP and FAO LFFS targeted remote areas,
they provided a motorcycle to each government staff facilitator to
reach the FFS sites which were usually non accessible by foot from
their offices. If the project budget is limited, the procurement of
Part 2: FFS Planning and Management 41
2
means of transport can be a major issue. To avoid such a major
expenditure, the FFS programme can use Farmers Facilitators (FFs)
from the target communities. However, they are not available in the
first year. It is also important to create a group of experienced FFS
facilitators who can provide technical and process backstopping.
This issue is closely linked with the project expansion planning as
described below, and must be addressed at the early programme
planning stage.
As explained in the weaknesses of FFS, timely delivery of learning

materials to each FFS is a challenge for many FFS programmes. In
many countries, an overly bureaucratic system does not allow timely
funds release to procure learning material, which severely
undermines the ability of FFSs to perform well. Careful planning of
procurement is a must, especially where procurement delays are
apparent. Effective decentralization of procurement to the local
level is highly desirable for timely delivery of learning material.
Finally, support to FFS programmes has not yet been recognized as a

part of the work responsibilities for government extension staff in
many countries. An FFS programme is usually considered to be a
project, and therefore extension staff expect to be paid a facilitation
allowance for their participation. Once agreed, timely payment of
allowances becomes an issue especially if the target area is widely
dispersed and its facilitators are scattered in remote areas. This guide
recommends that an FFS programme must have monthly facilitator
meetings to plan for the coming month and share the experience
among the facilitators. The monthly meetings can be used to make
allowance payments and collect monthly reports.
2 Programme Cost and Fund

Disbursement
FFS Implementation Cost
FFS programme costs vary from place to place and according to the
enterprises to be practiced. A benchmark for planning is around USD
1,000 to 1,700 per FFS as shown in the table below:
No Item Indicative figure

USD/FFS/Yr
1 Stationary 100
2 PCE inputs 300 – 500
3 Allowance + transportation for facilitators 300 – 500
4 Exchange visits 100 – 150
5 Field day 100 – 200
6 Graduation 100 – 250
Total 1000 – 1700
In addition to these direct costs, the following costs must be included

to maintain the quality of FFS:
Monthly meeting transportation cost;
Allowance for lecturers of special topics (once per month per FFS);
and
Backstopping costs.
The cost of constructing a learning site is optional. FFS programmes

are usually carried out during the rainy season and provision of
roofing material may be required.
An intensive (two weeks) FFS TOF is required for inexperienced FFS

facilitators as well as training for all facilitators (one to two weeks) on
the technical aspects of the learning enterprises and PCE. A one
week TOT FFS facilitation course must also be offered to FFs who will
be engaged to work as facilitators.
2
Direct Funding Mechanism vs. Delivery-Based Funding
Mechanism
Funds and materials can be channelled to FFSs by: (i) direct funding
whereby a project advance is paid into a bank account operated
by the FFS; and (ii) delivery- based funding in which the project office
procures all learning materials including stationeries and PCE inputs,
and pays allowances to its facilitators.
Many FFS projects supported by FAO and other donors in Kenya used
the direct funding mechanism. Around USD 600 800 was deposited
into each FFS account as an accountable advance to meet the
cost of eligible FFS expenditures. The merit of this direct funding
mechanism is a considerable reduction in project management
costs since each group is responsible to procure its own learning
materials and pay allowances to their facilitators. This experience
develops each group member’s capacity to manage a bank
account and funds; skills that can be used for income generation
activities (IGAs) after graduation. The direct funding mechanism also
contributes to cost consciousness among farmers and raises
awareness about the cost of extension services.
Improved facilitator performance is a further benefit; they become

directly accountable to the group rather than to project supervisors.
Some FFS groups have refused to pay the field allowance when
members were not satisfied with the facilitator’s performance or
requested the project to change the facilitator because of poor
delivery. This system has many advantages for project management
as well as empowerment of farmers.
Despite these merits, the direct funding mechanism is usually not

permitted in governmental FFS programmes due to accounting
policies. This was the case for the ISFP. The rationale was that direct
funding may undermine the accounting integrity and result in
unaccounted expenditure. For FAO projects, direct fund transfer to
FFSs was carried out under a memorandum of understanding (MOU)
between the project, the counterpart government agency and the
FFSs, whereby each FFS acknowledges its responsibility and
2
accountability in its use of project funds. The FFS was also obliged to
provide an accounting report supported by evidence of
expenditure.
A clear advantage of a delivery based mechanism is that the

project can control procurement and be accountable for the
expenditure. Bulk procurement can also reduce overall costs.
However, this system requires adequate administrative capacity in
management, planning and logistics. Disadvantages of the delivery
based mechanism include complex procurement and delays in
delivery of learning material. The experience of ISFP as well as other
FFS programmes that have used a delivery based mechanism
demonstrates that procurement and delivery can create a major
bottleneck to meeting FFS demands. As a result, some FFSs became
idle due to lack of learning material.
This guide recommends the use of the direct funding mechanism,

but incorporating some aspects of a delivery based funding
mechanism. The FAO funded LFFS procured key stationary items,
such as manila paper and pens that are essential during the early
stage of the FFS. The LFFS also procured initial inputs required for the
first PCE. This arrangement allowed each FFS time to register with the
government and open a bank account. The balance of funds
needed for FFS activities was then deposited into the bank account.
The project supported only 16 FFSs in the first year so this approach
was feasible. However, if there are more than 50 FFSs distributed in
different areas, delivery of FFS materials would be a major task as
was experienced in the SSIS FFSs in the Philippines where
wells/engines/pump sets as well as inputs including fertilizer and
certified seeds were provided to 145 FFSs in five provinces.
Curriculum Development
2
Technical Package: Enterprise Catalogue
This guide does not aim to develop a procedure and facilitation skills
for a site specific enterprise solution as in the process of participatory
comparative experiment (PCE). An open end approach with PCE is
in fact ideal in FFS, which can address the issues that farmers are
currently facing. However, it has its own disadvantages and
limitations such as:
During the initial phase of an FFS programme facilitators may not
have a sufficient level of participatory facilitation skills for an open
end participatory approach;
Every organization has its operational mandate which may limit
the activities that can be supported and the knowledge of its
facilitators may also be limited; and
Many inexperienced facilitators would not be able to design PCE
or identify design parameters for unfamiliar subjects.
Instead, this guide is designed to help inexperienced facilitators and

groups to select enterprises to be practiced, and advise how to
establish and monitor/evaluate the performance of the enterprises
selected by the FFS members. Therefore, any project that adopts this
manual must prepare in advance of project implementation a set of
clear technical enterprise packages described in an Enterprise
Catalogue, to offer to FFSs (see an example in Annex 1) and a Study
Guide (Annex 2) that includes basic enterprise designs and
suggested parameters to be measured in PCE. Preparation of the
Enterprise Catalogue and Study Guide requires a process of
community consultation as well as technical and market knowledge.
The main advantage of preparing and using such a catalogue is to

standardize the fieldwork and allow the project to deliver a
consistent quality of facilitation services. However, such a prescriptive
enterprise catalogue limits the ability of facilitators to respond to
improvised requests and incorporate new ideas from farmers.
2
Thus, enterprise catalogues must be developed with caution, to
reflect real issues that FFS farmers face, allowing flexibility, and the
proposed enterprises should be technically appropriate and
economically feasible for the target farmers.
Period of the FFS Cycle
The climate, local environment and study focus as well as local

people’s preferences should be carefully considered in deciding
how many months are required to help farmers to achieve the
desired project result. Although the length of the study cycle may
vary, this guide recommends a one year FFS programme to foster
farmers’ analytical skills as well as members’ empowerment
processes.
Trees planted in FFS host farms after one year
Introducing Tree Nursery Enterprise
A distinctive feature of this guide is in the tree nursery enterprise

which is a requirement for all FFSs during the dry season or when AESA
becomes routine. This was the key component for promoting crop
diversification and a means for farmers to make effective use of the
season with less labour demand. However, the experience of both
the ISFP and the JICA funded FFS in Ethiopia showed that tree nursery
activities were not popular among farmers as the first field activity.
2
Usually, farmers much prefer agriculture or livestock production
systems that can generate immediate cash income. Therefore, any
FFS that includes tree nursery activities should begin with agricultural
and/or livelihood enterprises and introduce the nursery enterprise
only after the members have become accustomed to the FFS
concept. Tree nursery enterprises can enhance PCE and AESA skills
since seed treatment, observation on germination and initial growth
can be repeated within a short period of time. Grafting of fruit trees,
as an example of IGA, can also provide a good exercise for PCE and
AESA using a comparison procedure.
2 Capacity Development
Training of Facilitators
Training of facilitators (TOF) is crucial in all FFS programmes. FFS

master trainers, who have a vast experience in FFS, usually conduct
TOFs. FFS extension staff who are to become facilitators must
undergo a minimum of a two week TOF course (a typical course
agenda is provided in Annex 4). In addition, they must complete at
least a one week technical training on Enterprise Catalogue related
technologies, including agriculture, livelihood development and
forestry issues. Only after completing the two courses, should trainees
be allowed to conduct FFS.
TOF for Candidate Farmer Facilitators (FFs)
This guide promotes farmer facilitators to support expansion of FFSs

and improve project sustainability. Candidate FFs are selected from
their own groups and provided a week long training to improve their
facilitation skills. The selection of candidate FFs is carried out under
the guidance of the facilitator in consultation with the members
after completing several months in FFS. The candidates are selected
according to criteria approved by group members (see Part III
Step 10 for more details).
The following basic criteria are applied in selecting farmer facilitators:

Level of attendance in FFS sessions;
Level of adoption of practices learnt at the host farm (i.e. PCEs in
2
their own farms);
Willingness to provide their own time to run FFS;
Communication skills;
Physical fitness;
Willing to stay in the community; and
Socially accepted by their community.
After the one week TOF course, these FF candidates were given the
opportunity to facilitate FFS sessions with their own groups under
supervision of their extension facilitator (a typical FF TOF course
agenda is provided in Annex 5). While conducting FFS, they were
backstopped and evaluated by the extension facilitator. Once the
FFs passed evaluation (see Part III Step 10) by the facilitators, they
were tasked to form new FFSs in their neighbourhoods.
2 Expansion Planning
Extension-led and Farmer-led FFS
FFSs supported by an extension facilitator are referred to as

“Extension-led FFS”, and those run by FFs as “Farmer-led FFS”. A FFS
programme must start with Extension led FFS. Each extension worker
is typically expected to manage two FFS sessions per week during
the first year. During the period of the Extension led FFSs, each group
identifies two farmers who can be selected as FFs; though as many
as four or six may be identified.
After graduation from the Extension led FFSs and basic training, FFs
are usually assigned one or two new FFS groups (usually referred to
as child FFS in the neighbourhood of the mother FFS). Such FFs are
also given an allowance per session, but no transportation
allowance is given since they are conducting their FFS sessions near
their own localities.
The chart below demonstrates an example of how the number of FFS

can be expanded within a five year period with Extension led FFSs
and Farmer led FFSs. The following assumptions are made for this
example FFS programme:
There are 10 project extension led facilitators;
Each extension led facilitator has two FFS per week for the first
year but one FFS from the second year in order to provide
backstopping to his/her Farmer led FFSs;
Each Extension led FFS would produce one pair of FFs (two FFs
every year; and
One pair of FFs would conduct two FFSs per year
This guide recommends two FFs would form a team to facilitate one
FFS in order to maintain quality FFS. Farmer led FFS would not
produce any FF.
2
TABLE 1 Indicative Expansion Schedule
No of No of Total
Year Type of FFS Facilitators new FF 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 FFS
1 Extension-led 10 20 20
Extension-led 5 5 5
2 Farmer-led 20 20 20 20
Extension-led 5 5 5
3 Farmer-led 30 10 30 30
Extension-led 5 5 5
4 Farmer-led 40 10 40 40
Extension-led 5 5 5
5 Farmer-led 50 10 50 50
Total 20 25 35 45 55 180
With help from FFs, the project would be able to support 180 FFSs over
five years. Relying solely on its extension facilitators, the project could
cover only 100 FFS (maximum) at a rate of two FFSs per year. This
expansion strategy also promotes sustainability of the project
because it will produce FFs who can become focal persons for
agricultural extension in the target communities. In addition, it is
difficult for government staff to each support two FFSs every year
because of their non FFS workload.
Field Day and Graduation
The “Field Day” (see Part III, Step 12) and the “Graduation” (Step 14)
are important aspects of an FFS expansion strategy. These two
events entail inviting non FFS neighbours to view the results of FFSs.
Frequently the neighbouring farmers who attend these events
request their own FFS and/or copy what they see in the field.
2 Monitoring and Evaluation

Regular Backstopping to Monitor FFS Performance
The backstopping provision of technical and management support

to FFS facilitators by experienced staff, is a major part of progress
monitoring of FFS with an aim to increase FFS quality. Monthly
meetings among facilitators are also useful to share FFS facilitation
and technical skills.
Based on the ISFP and FAO LFFS experience, the most challenging
aspects that backstoppers must pay attention to are:
Concept and methodology for PCE;
AESA session;
Time allocation; and
Mode of facilitation this requires behavioural changes for
facilitators who are used to operating as instructors.
A regional FFS master trainer (left) and a DFO (right) backstopping

FFS groups in ISFP
Backstoppers must recognize that backstopping is provided as

assistance and not as evaluation of facilitators. Backstoppers should
not conduct FFS sessions and should not disrupt FFS sessions
frequently; rather, they should observe and provide members and
facilitators with advice at an appropriate time. Such advice to
facilitators should not be given in front of FFS members; it is important
2
to maintain farmer trust in their facilitator. Backstoppers must
participate in the whole FFS session and check facilitation skills using
a “Session Check List 1 and 2” (see Annex 3 1 and 3 2). The check
lists will then be used for review at a separate meeting with the
facilitator after the session. The first sheet of the check list is more
qualitative and the second sheet more quantitative. It is
recommended that the first sheet be used during the initial period
of the project to provide more detailed advice to the facilitator, and
the second one be used to identify strengths and weaknesses of the
FFS. Either sheet must be used with care when presented to the
facilitators and never shown to the FFS members.
Backstopping teams giving recommendations to facilitators after FFS

sessions
Group Weekly Report/Record
After each FFS session, the members of each FFS group should
prepare a “Weekly FFS Report” to describe the learning sessions of
the FFS. This is not a report for facilitators to complete. The report is
used by the FFS group members to monitor and evaluate the
performance of the FFS and facilitators. In addition, it aims to:
monitor whether the facilitators were present during FFS sessions;
capture how the session was conducted problems, impressions
of members;
check relevance of sessions; and
record the activities.
2
The weekly reports should be made in duplicate using carbon paper;
the original is sent to the field coordinator, and the copy remains with
the FFS. The report is sent to HQ and the facilitator’s allowance paid
on the basis of the report. However, paper based reports have
limitations; they are often time consuming to prepare, must be
physically transported from FFS to HQ, and must be manually
processed. If not submitted and processed in a timely manner their
information is of limited value for monitoring and management.
Mobile phones are beginning to replace paper based reporting

methods. Mobile phone coverage is becoming widely available in
less developed countries and the technology provides a new
dimension for project management, especially in M&E. FAO projects
in Kenya (LFFS) and the Philippines (SSIS FFS) have developed a
Mobile Phone Based Monitoring System, which enables a continuous
recording of performance of FFSs and the FFS facilitators. The system
is designed in such a way that data are sent by mobile phones to a
web based database which automatically processes and
aggregates data for presentation through the project’s website. This 7
system allows the field coordinator and project staff members at the
HQ, or even in the donor HQ offices, to monitor the performance of
the facilitators and FFSs through the internet. Monitoring templates
are structured in a simple format with questions mainly requiring
either a numerical or Yes/No answer (see FFS Mobile Phone Question
7. For details, visit:
Sheet, Annex 3 3). A maximum of 20 questions is advisable. Major
http://mpbms.ats advantages of the Mobile Phone Based Monitoring System are: its
africa.com/index.
php# ease of use (farmers with primary school education can operate the
User name: visitor, mobile phone with minimal training), timely availability of outputs
Password: visitor
(due to immediate transmission and automated processing),
2
widespread accessibility (due to web based application), and ability
to link with electronic funds transfer (for payment of allowances,
transfer of funds for purchase of inputs, payment for sales, repayment
of credit, etc.).
However, paper based reports must still be used to provide a

permanent record at the FFS site. One disadvantage of the Mobile
Phone Based Monitoring System is its limited ability to capture
qualitative information.
Mobile Phone Monitoring System
Both FAO projects provided a mobile phone to each FFS and an FFS
member (usually M&E office of the FFS) was tasked to report weekly
FFS performance by completing the report using the mobile phone
as shown above. The designated operators were given a short
training and the results show that farmers have no problem to use the
mobile phone.
2
Graphs Generated with the Data Provided by Mobile Phones
2
Facilitator’s Monthly Report
Each facilitator must prepare and submit a written monthly report

summarizing his/her FFS sessions (see Annex 3 4). This report is used to
monitor FFS performances and to understand whether the facilitators
are on the right track, if they have requested help from the
coordinator, and how they are handling issues that arise during FFS.
Other Key M&E Templates
There are other reporting templates that may be useful for any FFS
programme. The following were used in the ISFP.
Problem Report by Facilitators.
This report can be used when facilitators have problems that require
intervention from the coordinator (see Annex 3 5).
Empowerment Process Report.
Qualitative assessment of FFS is mainly carried out using the

Empowerment Process Documentation Report (see Annex 3 6). This
template was designed to observe changes and/or signs of
empowerment of each individual and group during the project
implementation. Those changes are documented for management
staff to assess the level of empowerment within the FFS.
59
Part III: Field Manual for
3
FFS Facilitators
Implementation Process
The two diagrams below illustrate the implementation flow and an

indicative calendar for FFS for farm forestry and livelihood development.
The FFS cycle with this guide is divided into 14 steps and each step has
a sequence of actions with clearly defined responsibilities and outputs.
More details on each step are provided in the following sections.
The starting month of the FFS is determined by the planting season.

The critical steps during the early stage of FFS are Step 3: Enterprise
Selection and Step 6: Establishment of the Host Farm. Enterprise
Selection in Step 3 must be conducted in a democratic manner after
the Facilitators introduce the “Profile” tool of RuralInvest to analyze
the feasibility of selected enterprises. All logistical preparations have
to be prepared for Step 6 to ensure timely planting.
Once the host farm is established, AESA sessions start in Step 7.

Nursery establishment should start as soon as possible after members
are accustomed to the AESA routine because nurseries offer many
opportunities for PCE.
Before graduation, FFSs should be given the opportunity to carry out

exchange visits and/or field days. In preparation for field days, the
FFS should complete a participatory evaluation to finalize the
presentation to visitors. Farmer facilitator selection and training
should be conducted about the 7th or 8th month after inception.
Once trained, the FFs should facilitate their own group to accustom
them to run FFSs. These events require several weeks of preparation,
so careful time coordination is required.
3 STEP MAIN ACTIVITY

Implementation Steps
MAIN ACTOR OUTPUTS
1 Ground Working Field Coordinator FFS Groups Selected

Facilitators
Field Coordinator Agreement Register

2 Group Organization
Facilitators sheets
Selection of Enterprise selected

3 Enterprise and
Facilitators
Members
Profile with
Preparation Profiles Rural Invest prepared
Selection of Host Host farmer selected
4 Farm and Learning
Facilitators
Members
Preparation on
Site Preparation learning site
Field comparative
Farm Enterprise
5 Planning
Facilitators
Members
experiment design and
proposals prepared
6 Establishment of
Enterprise Sites
Facilitators
Members
Enterprise site prepared
Weekly reports
7 LFFS Weekly Session
Facilitators
Members Monthly reports
Nursery PCE
Tree Nursery
8 Establishment
Facilitators
Members
design prepared
Nursery establishment
Farmer Facilitator
9 Selection
Facilitators
Members
Farmer Facilitators
10 Exchange Visits
Facilitators
Members
Exchange visit reports
Participatory
11 Participatory
Evaluation
Facilitators
Members Evaluation Reports
12 Field day
Facilitators
Members
Field Day reports
Preparation of Project
13 Proposals with Rural
Facilitators
Members
Project Proposals
Invest Module 3
14 Graduation Facilitators
Members
Farmer Experts
Steps and Indicative Activity Calendar
Step 1st Month 2nd Month 3rd Month 4th Month 5th Month 6th Month 7th Month 8th Month 9th Month 10th Month 11th Month 12th Month
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50
1 Ground Working & Promotion
2 Group Organization
3 Se ection of Enterprise and Preparation of Profi es
4 Se ection of Host Farm and Learning Site Preparation
5 Farm Enterprise P anning

6 Estab ishment of Enterprise Sites
7 FFS Week y Session

Part 3: Field Manual for FFS Facilitators
8 Tree Nursery estab ishment
9 Former Faci itator Se ection and TOF
10 Exchange Visits
11 Participatory Evo ution
12 Fie d Day
13 Preparation of Proposa s
14 Graduation
Note: Weeks 8 to unt 11 are the nd cat ve p ant ng season

61
3
STEP N.1-2-3-4_Prove ARRI impaginato 15/01/12 18.55 Pagina 62
62
63
Step 1 Ground Work and

FFS Promotion
3
STEP 1
Purpose Identify farmers who are willing to participate in FFS and

share knowledge with their neighbours.
Identify constraints and opportunities for FFS implementation.
Share FFS concepts and implementation methods with
potential groups and/or farmers.
Main Outputs 1. FFS Groups selected

2. Constraints and Opportunities identified
Time Estimate One to four visits within two weeks
Important Points 1. Briefing.

FFS programme should ensure that provincial/district
administrations are well informed about the programme
and seek their support for FFS activities.
2. Member Selection.
Member selection should be transparent and based on
the agreed selection criteria.
Never make an arbitrary choice. This would likely cause
social and political problems at a later stage, and affects
the ability of the FFS to continue.
Field Coordinator must carefully manage the situation
when local government officials and politicians want to
become directly involved in the selection processes. It is
important that the selection process is based on the
objectives of the programme and FSS.
Use a ballot system to select members if there are more
than 30 qualified applicants.
3. Location of FFS.
Physical access to the FFS host farm should be thoroughly
analyzed.
3
continued
Select easy access communities during the early years of
the programme.
STEP 1 Consider the merits and demerits of group distribution
(some examples are shown below).
MERITS DISADVANTAGES
A Impacts are visible. Remote communities tend
Easy to manage and to be left out.
monitor. The programme would
Easy to form FFS receive complaints from
network after non FFS communities.
graduation. The programme may not
have enough facilitators
to support those
communities with limited
access.
B Benefits will be High transportation costs.

equally distributed High backstopping costs.
among remote
communities. Difficult to monitor.
Extension workers are Difficult to make impacts
usually assigned to visible.
cover a wider area.
A: Concentration of groups within a few communities.

B: Dispersed selection of groups among different communities.
Sequence of 1. Briefing for Provincial/District Administration, and other

Activities relevant agencies by Field Coordinators.
Introduce the FFS programme to the provincial/district
administration, other key stakeholders including NGOs
and private sector companies.
Agree to conduct special topics that would require
support from different institutions.
2. Meeting with Community Leaders.

Meet with community leaders to introduce the
programme and call a meeting to select FFS members.
Part 3: Field Manual for FFS Facilitators 65
3. Community Meeting and FFS Member Selection.

Introduce FFS methodology, benefits and responsibilities of
3
FFS members. STEP 1
Conduct a Mini-FFS and Q&A session (see below).
Select FFS members according to the selection criteria.
4. Preparation of Group Location maps.

Prepare sketch maps in relation to the nearest market
centre (see Annex 3-7).
5. Registration of FFS as a legal entity.

Register each FFS at the appropriate government office to
make it a legal entity. Registration is usually needed
before opening a group bank account.
Priority Selection Every FFS programme should develop selection criteria

Criteria according to the policy of the programme. At least 30 to 40
percent of FFS members should be women. People who have
participated in similar activities and/or received support from
similar programmes should be excluded. The following are
example criteria used in the FAO-LFFSs: Members should be
Willing to participate weekly FFS sessions for a period of
one year.
Willing to work in a group and share knowledge with the
neighbours.
Women-headed households.
Families belonging to vulnerable groups (low income,
handicapped, ethnic minority etc.).
Lessons Learned 1. Meeting with Community Leaders.

It is recommended to provide a leaflet (see below, an
example used in FAO-LFFS) that describes the FFS
programme to the community leaders when arranging a
community meeting to select FFS members.
2. During Community Meetings and Selection.

Selection should not be conducted by a single facilitator.
3
continued
The field coordinator or other facilitators should support
the community meetings and selection process.
STEP 1 Often only a few community members answer the
questions raised by the FFS programme. It is important to
involve the whole group by using facilitation skills such as
“Talk Ball (see Step 2)”.
Facilitators need to use the Q&A session effectively using
the “Frequently Asked Questions” guide attached.
When national level staff from HQ are present at the
selection, their interventions in the selection process
should be minimal and avoid undermining the authority
of the facilitator. After all, it is the facilitators’ responsibility
to organize the FFSs.
The judgement of facilitators on the selection process
should be respected, as long as the selection criteria are
applied.
After the selection, each member should be provided
with the FFS leaflet.
It may not be possible to complete selection of all
members in one day. Do not rush the selection. It is
important that the community understands the
requirements of the FFS programme and selection
criteria.
3. Facilitators are New in the Area.

If a facilitator is new to his/her assigned geographic
area, local extension officers from other institutions
should be asked to accompany the facilitator to initial
meetings. Community members may be suspicious of
unknown facilitators who visiting their community without
proper introduction.
Graduations:
Members who have regularly and continuously
3
attended will be qualified and awarded the Beneficiary Selection Criteria
Sustainable Livelihood
Development Project STEP 1
certificate during the graduation ceremony.
Applicants who want to join the project must in the Mau Complex
be CFA members, be willing to work in a group
Farmer Field Schools

and attend LFFS sessions once a week for a
period of around 8 months. Only LFFS
graduates will be eligible to apply for the SLDF.
Each LFFS will have approximately 25 members
and at least 40 percent of LFFS members
overall must be women. The key priority criteria
are as follows:
Residential CFA officials within the forest

border communities;
Women headed households;
Families with handicapped members;
Family living within 3 km of the protected
Sustainable Livelihood Development Fund forest areas;
Families with more than 5 children;
Families among the vulnerable of CFA
members;
The SLDF aims to support those who graduated
Families living in remote upland areas, with
from LFFS to scale up successful livelihood
relatively limited external access;
activities through the use of revolving loans to
small groups. Once the group repays the loan, CFA members who are willing to start saving
for future investment; and
the funds can then be used to support others.
CFA members who have not received
support from other donors/NGOs.
Target Beneficiary and Project Area

The project intends to bring benefits to both male
Sustainable Livelihood Development and women CFA members who participate in Important Aspects of
Project in the Mau Complex conservation and management within the Farmer Field Schools
following eight forest stations of Mau Forest
Complex:
Sorget; Londiani; Makutano; Maragat; Tendano;
Kericho; Keresoi; and Masaita.
Livelihood Farmer Field Schools (LFFS)
Weekly Sessions:
Project Goal Learning subjects are selected and decided by
This project aims to enable community members the participants. Both enterprise related (crops,
living adjacent to forests to develop sustainable, forestry, livestock, horticulture, etc.) and non-
environmentally positive alternatives to related (health, home economics, leadership
destructive forest exploitation though etc.) learning sessions are organized by facilitator
Farmer Field Schools (FFS) are an experience-
and conducted during FFS every week.
Testing and demonstrating feasible approaches based, innovative, participatory and interactive
to livelihood improvement for forest-adjacent way of learning, and have the following general
communities; objectives:
Creating a revolving fund to help groups adopt To build the farmer's capacity to analyze their
promising sustainable livelihoods; and farming systems and to identify their main
Contributing to renewed community capacity constraints,
building through re-engaging in CFAs and To test possible solutions suitable for their
developing CFA capacities. farming system by using simple comparative
This project goal will be achieved through experiments which build on existing knowledge,
providing opportunities to develop livelihood To enable farmers to adapt existing
development skills in Livelihood Farmer Field technologies, or to adopt new technologies so
School (LFFS) and access to the Sustainable that they become “experts” who are more
Livelihood Development Fund (SLDF). capable and responsive to changing conditions.
3 Promotion: Mini – FFS
STEP 1 In communities where FFS is new, it is vital that the first contact makes
STEP 1 a clear impression about FFS and shows the community members
what they can expect in FFS sessions by giving them some FFS
experience.
Materials: A4 Papers, Pens, one or more tick specimens (insects).
Time: Around 45 minutes
Steps
1. Ask a few volunteers

to draw a tick or any
other common
insect/pest
2. Collect the drawings

& displays them
to all.
3. Ask how many legs

the ticks (or other
insect) in the
drawings have and
the participants look,
count and share
what they see.
3
4. If the number of legs differs from drawing to drawing, the facilitator
mentions that people have different ideas on the number of legs of
the tick and asks “Which is correct?”
5. After some discussion, facilitator brings out a tick and asks them to STEP 1
look and count how many legs the tick has. (Be careful not make
fun of or humiliate those who provided the wrong information.)
6. Confirm the number of legs.
Key Messages for the farmers:

Knowledge and technologies are not always something brought by
outsiders such as extension workers. Farmers can develop their own
capacity. FFS helps farmers to identify what they know, and what
they do not know, and to understand what they do know may not
always be correct. Through observation and discussion, we are
able to know our misconceptions; our knowledge on something we
previously thought that we knew very well is not always correct. FFS
provides an opportunity for participating farmers to confirm what is
right to them through collective observation and discussion. So say
to the farmers “You can develop your own solutions with FFS” and
“Let’s observe the fields together with your farmer colleagues
without prejudice”.
3 Frequently asked questions

General Questions about FFS
STEP 1
Q1. What is FFS?
A: FFS is often described as a school without walls for improving

farmers’ decision-making capacity and stimulating local
innovations for sustainable agriculture or forestry. It is a
participatory approach, which gives farmers an opportunity to
make a choice in methods of production through discovery-
based learning tools.
Q2. What will we receive from FFS?
A: Little in terms of materials and money. However, we will provide

you with opportunities for you to gain important knowledge that
will eventually lead to improvement of your livelihood.
Q3. How do you improve our livelihood?
A: FFS would not directly improve your livelihood. It is like a school.

After graduating from FFS, we expect that you will be able to
improve your livelihood by yourself by using knowledge you
gained and/or learned during FFS.
Input material
Q4. Why does one FFS allocate only a small amount of learning inputs
per group?
A: FFS provides a method of learning and developing capacity; it

is not a project to provide material to groups or individuals. FFS
encourages you so that each individual learns from the field and
replicates the learning experience on their own farms. It is
important to use small quantities of material inputs so that many
farmers can afford to do the same using their own initiative.
3
Q5. Will FFS directly provide benefit to individuals?
A: FFS is a school. Each individual is benefiting from building

knowledge in the school. No, FFS will not provide direct material
inputs to individuals. It will not provide, for example, seeds and STEP 1
seedlings to each individual. However, it is up to the members
to decide how to use the produce from agricultural crops and
seedlings grown at the group learning sites.
Q6. What happens to the balance of learning inputs (funds) if any

after FFS?
A: Groups are advised to commit all their FFS group fund before
graduation. If groups still have some money left, they could start
another field comparative experiment.
Q7. Can FFS assist in borehole sinking and bridge construction or assist
the resource poor.
A: We understand the situation of the farmers. But at the same

time, we have our own limits and cannot provide all that the
farmers ask for. It is important for us to extend out our efforts to
as many farmers as possible with our limited funds in promoting
sustainable land use.
Income Generation Combined with RuralInvest and

Investment Fund
- If an FFS project has a scope for scaling-up activities-
Based on the experience of FAO-LFFS, farmers were very interested to

obtain information of the loan and its conditions. It is usually difficult
for an FFS programme to be fully informed on all loan conditions and
terms at the inception of the project. Explain clearly what is known
and not known at the time of the meeting. Some of questions raised
during the FAO-LFFS promotion are provided in the following.
3
Q8. Can the FFS be given additional money?
A: Yes. It is anticipated that the participating farmers would

continue what they learned at the FFS in their own farms. There
STEP 1 are many ways that small investments could improve activities
on your farmlands. It may be possible for a small investment
fund to assist you to scale-up the enterprises you learned.
Q9. Can everybody apply for investment loan?
A: Only FFS graduates are eligible for the loan.
Q10. Can an individual borrow money?
A: No. The loan will be given either to FFS or clusters (small groups
of 5 to 10 members) under the FFS.
Q11. What would be the procedure for getting the loan?
A: All FFS or clusters will be required to prepare a proposal with

assistance from facilitators and RuralInvest. The proposal will be
submitted to the programme where we analyze the feasibility.
3
STEP 1
74
75
Step 2 Group Organization
3
STEP 2
Purpose Level expectations with a clear understanding of what the

FFS programme can and cannot provide.
Establish the basic agreement with the group to start
FFS activities.
Register group members.
Establish group norms.
Decide the stationary to be purchased and delivered by
the programme.
Conduct a baseline survey.
Main Outputs 1. Group agreements.

2. Stationery delivery notes.
3. Member registration sheets.
4. Group bank account.
Time Estimate Two Weeks
Importan Points 1. Levelling farmers’ expectations (see page 81).

Avoid raising false expectations of FFS among
group members.
Farmers must understand that FFS’s low inputs for
activities are important for them when it comes to
replication at their own plots. People may hesitate to
replicate technologies from FFS after graduation if the
learning materials / inputs are too expensive. Even if a
programme has investment funds to support FFS
graduates, it is important to stress the wise use of locally
available material.
2. Confirmation of acceptance.
Facilitators should not convince group members to take
an immediate decision on starting FFS. The group
3
continued
members need to have a clear overview of what FFS can
offer before deciding to participate.
Signing of the agreement should be carried out only
STEP 2
after giving one week for the members to understand its
contents. The facilitator should not hurry the signing
process.
3. Weekly reports.
If a mobile phone monitoring system is available, explain
the system and elect one Monitoring Officer who is
capable to use a mobile phone.
If such technology is not available, the use of the weekly
reporting template has to be explained to the members.
The weekly report should be completed by members, not
by the facilitator, at the end of every FFS session.
4. Formation of sub-groups.
Make sure that each sub-group includes a literate person.
5. Stationery.
In ISFP, all stationary was procured and delivered by the
project. The FAO-LFFS uses a combination of project
procurement and FFS procurement. It is recommended
that FFS members should provide whatever materials are
available in their locality such as wall clock or cloth tape
measure.
Depending on the programme policy of fund
disbursement and material delivery, the programme and
FFS members must agree what is to be purchased and
delivered by the programme.
6. Baseline survey.
All members must be surveyed to allow the impact of the
FFS programme to be measured.
There are many methodologies available for baseline
survey and impact assessment. Thus, an appropriate
method needs to be selected.
Sequence of
Activities
1. FFS orientation.
Provide clear guidance on FFS activities.
3
An example of a timetable for orientation is provided STEP 2
below.
2. Confirmation to become FFS members.

Confirm selected members wish to participate in the FFS
as a group.
3. Selection of FFS leaders.

Select and appoint the following group officials:
. Chairperson;
. Vice chairperson;
. Secretary;
. Treasurer;
. Time keeper; and
. Monitoring officer.
4. Formation of sub-groups (see page 82).

Divide members into four or five groups.
Prepare agreed group objectives (slogans) and select the

leader of each sub-group.
3
continued
5. Assigning the host team (see page 84).
Explain the role of the host team.
STEP 2 Select one sub-group and assign the role of host team.
6. Deciding the FFS meeting day.

Decide the FFS meeting day.
7. Participatory Introduction.
Conduct pair-wise interviews (see page 86).
8. Group agreement (see page 87).

Undertake a Q&A session on the agreement.
Agree on obligations/responsibilities of both the project
and the group.
Group officials sign the agreement.
9. Registration of members (see page 88).

Before starting each regular FFS session, record which
members are present using the “roll call”.
10. Stationery.
Agree on what is to be provided by either the project or
the FFS, using “A Standard List of Stationary and
Procurement Responsibility” (see page 91).
Deliver basic stationary necessary to conduct FFS sessions
for the initial steps.
Upon delivering the agreed stationary items, get
“Stationary Delivery Note” signed by the Chairperson (see

page 91).
3
STEP 2
11. Group norm agreement.
All members must agree on the group’s rules including
learning attitudes, participation etc.
Examples of Group Norms:
. Do not bring politics to FFS.
. No smoking in the class.
. Do not come drunk to the session venue.
. Respect other peoples opinions.
. Conflicts to be solved democratically.
. Every participant and facilitator to keep to the timetable.
. Late comers pay designated fines.
12. Baseline Survey.

Carry out a baseline survey with the Form (see page 92).
Lessons Learned 1. Deciding the meeting day.

Avoid market day when deciding the group meeting day.
Avoid Monday for the FFS meeting day. The FFS
programme needs a day for facilitator meeting and
event preparation.
2. FFS orientation.
FFS orientation is the key to make participants understand
the FFS properly.
It takes time for the many group members to understand
the whole concept of FFS. Thus, do not hurry.
FFS orientation contents should be well understood by
facilitators. It should be introduced during the TOF seminar.
3. Dealing with high expectations of the farmers.

At the start of FFS, group members will not have a clear
concept of FFS. Many people tend to expect a
government/ NGO programme to provide immediate
3
continued
and tangible benefits (donations). When they find there
is nothing other than learning, some may wish to
STEP 2 withdraw from the FFS. It is important, however, not to
convince those people to remain at the FFS. It is difficult
to change such people’s attitude and they might create
unrest during later stages.
4. Talk Ball
Make and use a talk ball to avoid dominance of a few
members and improve the level of participation among
people who are inactive in discussions (see page 93).
Proposed Time Table for FFS Orientation

Time Topic
8:30 - 8:35 am Opening Prayer
8:35 - 9:00 am Project Background & Activities
9:00 - 9:30 am What is a Farmer Field School (FFS)
9:30 - 9:45 am Project Inputs
9:45 - 10:00 am Self-introduction of FFS Members
10:00 - 10:30 am Important Aspects of FFS (Host farm, PTD, AESA)
10:30 - 10:45 am Q & A and General Discussions
10:45 - 11:00 am Confirmation of Acceptance
11:00 - 11:30 am Deciding the FFS meeting day
11:30 - 12:00 pm Election of Group Officials
12:00 - 12:30 pm Formation of Sub-groups and Role of Host Team
12:30 - 13:00 pm Registration of Members

Levelling of Expectations
3
If you feel that some group members have not properly understood STEP 2
the FFS concept, you can conduct a “Levelling of Expectation”
session.
The general objectives of the session are:

to find out participants’ expectations for the FFS sessions;
to identify farmers’ expectations that do not match with the FFS
framework; and
to identify participants’ key areas of interest.
The session can be conducted by asking following key questions:

What do you hope to gain from FFS?
What do you expect from the facilitators?
What do you expect from the project?
What do you think that the facilitators expect from you?
What do you think that the project expects from you?
Initially, it is difficult for group members to clearly understand what the

FFS programme can provide; many people tend to think that any
project would bring material benefits or cash to them. Repeat the
process if expectations do not match the FFS concept. Facilitators
should conduct “Levelling of Expectation” at the start of FFS to make
clear both responsibilities and limitations of the project as well as those
of the participants. Use the “Frequently Asked Question” section of
this manual as a reference in explaining to the participants.
3 Formation of Sub-group
Sub-grouping is an activity designed to divide the participants into
STEP 2
smaller groups to maximise their participation and to increase the
effectiveness of activities. Each sub-group is responsible for a
treatment or plot in the field comparative study and takes turn to
host FFS sessions.
The following are some of the merits of having sub-groups in FFS:

it is difficult to work with big groups;
sub-grouping provides an opportunity for all members of the group
to participate actively;
it increases each individual’s responsibility;
it enhances a sense of ownership in the learning process; and
small groups encourage people to pay more attention to
the sessions.
Often only a few group opinion leaders will dominate discussions

when the whole group participates in a group discussion. Such
situation would not benefit the other group members. Dividing a
group of 20 to 30 participants into small groups will increase the
chance for relatively shy participants to participate proactively in
the sessions. Each sub-group will also be given time to work together
in field activities and present findings, which provides every
participant with an opportunity to express their ideas and opinions in
front of people.
Important Consideration in Sub-Grouping.

The number of sub-groups in an FFS will depend on the number of
the members. In practice 4 (not less) to 5 sub-groups are
appropriate. However, it is important to make sure that each sub-
group includes at least one literate person who would be able to
help other people in conducting FFS. The following characteristics
should be taken into consideration:
3
Gender balance;
Number of illiterate persons;
Age distribution; and
Talent/Profession/Capacities (some people may happen to be
former teachers and/or government employees). STEP 2
3 Assignment of Host Team
STEP 2 A host team is a sub-group that is in charge of all of the activities of

a particular FFS session. Every week, one sub-group is assigned the
role of the host team, on a rotational basis. This provides an
opportunity for all members to take on managerial roles during the
FFS sessions.
The following are some of roles the host team is expected to perform
during the FFS session:
Arrange the venue and keep the learning site clean;
Check the attendance of members;
Facilitate the recapitulation session (to be done by previous
host team);
Introduce the resource person/guest speaker;
Facilitate the members to follow the programme;
Serve as time keeper;
Distribute training materials and any other materials as necessary;
Assist with necessary logistics;
Facilitate and lead energisers and group dynamics;
Carry out other functions assigned by the facilitator; and
Hand over the host team duties to the next host team
(sub-group) at the end of session.
Host team sitting together (at centre behind)

- Roll Call at the beginning of the FFS session -
3
Duties within the host team also rotate, and one person should not
repeat the same duty during the next host team assignment.
Bad examples of host team practice.

The followings are examples of bad Host Team practice: STEP 2
Only a few members in the host team are active and leading the
session (other sub-group members are not an effective part of the
host team);
Sub-group members do not work together; and
Some host team members are absent.
3 Pair-wise Interview
STEP 2 The pair-wise interview is a participatory facilitation method to “break

the ice” among participants at the start of FFS. This helps participants
to get to know each other better and provides a relaxed atmosphere.
Materials: a piece of paper and a pen for those members who can
write (illiterate members should use their memory).
Time: Around 45 to 60 min (Time depends on the number

of participants).
Steps
1. Divide the participants into pairs by combining persons who

do not know each other well.
2. Ask each member to interview their partner by focusing on

questions such as:
. What is your name?
. What is your favourite food?
. Which hobbies do you practice?
. Other important information about oneself that people
should know (5 min.)
3. Each member
introduces the partner
to all participants in
2 min, summarizing the
information obtained
during the interview.
3
Extension-led-FFS Agreement
STEP 2
3 Roll Call
STEP 2 The main purpose of the roll call is to assess attendance by members.
It is the key criterion to determine which members are entitled to
graduate and to receive the FFS certificate from the project. In ISFP,
FFS members who were absent from more than 25% of meetings
were not entitled to graduate.
Attendance is also an indicator of how the members perceive the

quality of the FFS and facilitators. FFSs that have good quality
facilitators tend to have higher attendance rates. Most FFSs face a
decline in attendance at the early stages when people realise that FFS
does not provide “quick money and donations”. However, those who
remain become the core members and their performance generally
tends to be good. If the number of members in each sub-group
becomes unbalanced, rearrange the subgroups into equal numbers.
Attendance Register.
Each FFS should be provided with a record book for the role call. It is
important to check members’ attendance seriously and mark
appropriately. If the roll call procedure is not respected, the
members tend not to take FFS seriously.
Record attendance during the roll call as follows:

If the members are present at the opening, Check “/”
If the members are not present at the opening, Check “O”
3
If the members are present at the end, Check “\”
If the members are not present at the end, Check “O”
So members:
Who were present for the whole session get “X” STEP 2
Who came late get “O\”
Who excused themselves early get “/O”
Who were absent for the whole session get “OO”
3 A Standard List of Stationary and Procurement Responsibility
Item Quantity
Responsibility
Group Project
Total
STEP 2 Newsprint (Pack by ½) 0.5
Felt Pens (Black, Blue, Green & Red) 12
Refill ink (Black, Blue, Green & Red) 4
Ruler (30cm) 3
Crayons (12 colours) 3
Counter book 2Q 1
Mark book 1
Receipt book 1
Cash books 2Q 1
Spring file PVC 1
A4 loose leaf 1
Carbon paper 6
Masking tapes (1”) 2
Steel tape measure (5m) 3
Clothe Tape measure (3m) 3
Wall clock 1
Group weekly report 1
Iron storage boxes 1
Plastic sheet 1
Total
3
Stationery Delivery Note
STEP 2
3
Baseline Survey Form (Sample)
STEP 2
STEP 1
Group Practice: Talk Ball

3
There are always shy people who do not express their ideas in front
STEP 2
of other people. The “Talk Ball” facilitates shy people to speak up.
STEP 1
This method also helps to improve the level of participation.
How to make a Talk Ball:

1. Use two to three newsprint papers and tapes to make a ball.
When to use it:

Whenever only a few members are contributing to a discussion. To
get an opinion from all members one by one, throw the ball to the
person whom you would like to speak. Only the person holding
the ball is allowed to speak and the person who received the ball
must give his/her opinion.
After expressing an opinion, the ball will be thrown to other people
who have not contributed.
3
STEP 2
Key considerations.
Throw the ball equally among the members;
Throw the ball intentionally to members who have been inactive in
the discussions;
Do not through the ball to members who have already contributed
to the discussion; and
The person who received the ball should pass it on to other
members (there is no need to return the ball to the facilitator).
3
STEP 2
96
97
Step 3 Selection of Enterprise

and Preparation of
Profile with RuralInvest
3
STEP 3
Purpose Identify enterprise.

Prepare profile of selected enterprises with RuralInvest.
Main Outputs 1. Enterprise selected

2. Profile of selected enterprises prepared using RuralInvest
Time Estimate Three weeks:

1st week: Discussion
2nd week: Selection and Profile Definition
3rd week: Profile Completion
Important Points 1. Review of enterprises.

Facilitators should not advise on which enterprises to
select. The group might fail if the local environment is not
suitable for the selected enterprises. Make sure that the
selection of the group enterprise is part of the learning
process of FFS.
The facilitators also need to make sure that the selection
is based on the merits of collective learning, and not for
the benefit of the host farmer or opinion leaders.
2. Selection of enterprises.
Start with a simple and easy enterprise which appears to
offer potential for improved incomes for participants.
If members try to select more than two enterprises, you
should facilitate them to reduce the total number of
enterprises to avoid future confusion in AESA.
If a collective decision on the selection of enterprise
proves difficult, facilitators should advise the group to
hold a ballot (10 stones method – see page 102) to
promote democratic decisions.
3
continued
Sequence of 1. Review of enterprises.
Activities Review the enterprise catalogue and/or seek other
enterprise options available.
STEP 3
Discuss the following aspects of each proposed
enterprise including:
. purpose of each enterprise;
. size of the learning site;
. budget; and
. expected benefits.
Discuss in subgroups followed by plenary discussions.
Conduct a Q&A session to clarify the issues to be
addressed in FFS and members’ questions about
the enterprises.
Carry out expectation analysis: recommended for
members to understand better their own expectations.
2. Selection of enterprises.
Select enterprises using open discussion and making use
of the “Ten Stone” tool (see page 102).
3. Preparation of profile with RuralInvest module 2.

Using RuralInvest Module 2 (see Annex 3-8), prepare a Profile
of each potential livelihood enterprise and forestry
enterprise.
Lead Questions . What do you expect from this enterprise?

for Expectation . What do you know of this enterprise?
Analysis . What kind or benefits will you get from this enterprise?
. What is the expected cost of this enterprise?
. What kind of local materials are available for this enterprise?
. When do you expect to have the first crop from this
enterprise?
. What kind of pests and diseases do you have locally that
may affect the enterprise?
. What kind of problems have you encountered in your
farm activities?
. What kind of limitations do you face in carrying out

this enterprise?
3
. Is there an available market for the products produced in STEP 3
this enterprise?
Make sure that the selected enterprise provides possible
solutions for identified problems.
Lessons Learned 1. Enterprise selection.

Ensure that all members, especially those who are
illiterate, understand the purpose, merits and costs of
each enterprise.
Groups are not homogenous in their problems and
interests. Therefore, it takes time for a group to select an
enterprise. Give them sufficient time (a week or so) if
time permits.
Suggested A suggested timetable up to AESA follows. Allow

Timetable approximately two and a half hours for the main activities of
AESA Taking the day.
Time Activity Responsible
08:00-08:05 Prayer, Roll Call Host team
08:05-08:10 Brief Recap Host team
08:10-10:30 Main Activity of the day Facilitator

(AESA at later stage)
10:10-10:30 Group Dynamics Host team
10:30-11:30 Special Topic Facilitator
11:30-11:35 Review of the day’s Host team

activities
11:35-11:45 Planning for Next week Host team
11:45-11:50 Announcements Host team
11:50-11:55 Roll Call, Prayer Host team

3
continued
RuralInvest 1. RuralInvest: Module 2 - Profiling.
Profile FFS facilitators who will use RuralInvest should receive
STEP 3 preparation RuralInvest Training prior to using this tool. Module 2
manual includes the formats to be used in the profile
preparation. However, proper use of the formats for
Profile preparation requires 3 days training. For further
inquiries on RuralInvest training, contact: Investment-
Centre@fao.org
Module 2 provides a simplified methodology and
approach to facilitate the conversion of general ideas
into specific investment profiles. Drawn up in the field
with the direct participation of the FFS members, it helps
them to better understand the reality of the enterprises
that they want to practice - in terms of resources, costs
and outputs.
Profiling allows both FFS members and programme
management to assess the apparent feasibility of the
identified enterprise before putting it into practice.
Facilitators who assist FFS members to prepare profiles of
enterprises need to understand the key concepts of
Module 2 (see Annex 3-8).
2. Implementation of module 2.
Usually it takes two half day sessions, with data collection
by members of the group between the two sessions, to
complete the profiling of a selected enterprise.
The purpose of the first session is to finalize the selection
of the enterprise(s) to be considered and define in detail
the cost, income and other aspects for which additional
information will be needed. This is achieved by studying
the RuralInvest formats and deciding what information is
needed to complete each profile. In most cases, group
members will need to obtain additional information from
equipment suppliers, technical staff and other experts.
In the second session, the RuralInvest formats will be
completed and the group must then determine whether
the proposed enterprise is worthwhile or, if there is more

than one potential enterprise, select the preferred one.
3
Facilitators should not use the attached templates in the STEP 3
exercise with the FFS members. Instead, they need to
work with the group on large sheets of manila paper or a
blackboard so that everyone can clearly see the
information.
Once a group decision has been made, the facilitator

should submit the completed proposal to the field
coordinator who will then enter the data into the
RuralInvest program on the computer.
3 Group Practice: Ten Stones

The “ten stones” exercise is a participatory method to capture
STEP 3
STEP 1 participants’ preferences. The method is appropriate when selecting
multiple options including prioritizing issues and testing participants’
preferences before further discussions. It is recommended to
conduct the “Ten Stones” exercise when selecting group enterprises.
Procedure.
1. Use newsprint paper (Manila paper) and list the choices from
which the selection will be made;
2. Lay the papers on the floor;
3. Ask all members to fetch 10 stones; and
4. Ask the members to vote according to their preferences,
weighing their value with numbers of stones.
Rule.
Everybody has 10 stones each. Each participant must decide how
many of the 10 stones to put on their favourite enterprises. For
example, one can vote all ten stones on one enterprise if he/she
thinks that choice must be selected. If the participant prefers, they
can divide their stones between multiple enterprises (5 – 5 to two
choices or weighted 8 – 2 to two choices, or 4-3-3 for three
enterprises). It is recommended not to conclude the selection with
this voting. Further discussion may be required. All participants should
feel comfortable with the final selection, even though the ballot
provides a democratic result.
Review of the results and repeat of voting.

After the ballot exercise, analyze/discuss the results with group
members. The participants may not have captured well the rules of
10 stones ballot the first time. If they are not happy with the first
result, it can be done a second time. If so, explain the rules again.
After each ballot discuss the results of the voting before asking for
a decision.
3
STEP 3
STEP 1
3 Financial and Economic Terms

For RuralInvest Module 2
STEP 3
HELPING APPLICANTS TRANSFORM INVESTMENT CONCEPTS INTO REAL

PROJECTS
• General Information.
• Investment Costs.
• Operating Costs.
• Fixed Costs.
• Output (income, users, benefits).
• Profitability or Cost per Beneficiary.
WHAT IS A PROJECT?
The expenditure of resources in the present to generate benefits in
the future.
WHY PREPARE PROFILES?

• Ensure that the applicants understand what the project will involve.
• Avoid expending time and resources on FFS programmes for ideas
that are not feasible.
• Increase the ownership of the project on the part of the applicants.
• Identify weaknesses early enough to modify the project
successfully.
MAIN STAGES IN PREPARING AND USING A PROFILE

• Identify the project type that will achieve the given objectives.
• Define and prepare the project profile.
• Undertake the preliminary assessment.
• Revise the profile if necessary.
KEY SIMPLIFICATIONS USED IN PROFILES

• A profile looks at only a single point in time (when the project is fully
operational).
• Instead of replacing assets when they pass their economic life
span, a profile.
calculates an annual investment replacement allowance (or cost).
3
• A profile does not take into account financing costs (if credit is
eventually to be used).
• Cost estimates may be approximate and are often not detailed.
• Associated costs (training, TA, systems etc.) are rarely included.
• Only limited attention is given to project organization, markets and STEP 3
environmental impact.
KEY FACTORS TO REMEMBER WHEN PREPARING AND ASSESSING A

PROFILE
• The importance of demand.
• The availability of supply.
• Defining what operations will take place:
- Who are the beneficiaries?
- What will be the units of production?
- What will be the production cycle?
- What are the sales or output units?
• Categorizing the costs:
- Investment costs.
- Production or Operating Costs.
- Fixed or General Costs.
• Environmental Impact.
MEASURES OF FEASIBILITY
Income Generating Projects:
• Net Income per Year (income less costs).
• Number of years required to repay the initial investment.
• Net income per year after including the annual investment
replacement allowance.
Non Income Generating Projects:
• Total investment cost per beneficiary.
• Community contribution and donation per beneficiary.
• Annual operating costs per beneficiary.
• Annual fixed and variable costs per beneficiary.
• Paying for upkeep and maintenance.
3 Key Terms Used

in RuralInvest Module 2
STEP 3
UNIT OF PRODUCTION
• Unit used to measure the volume and cost of production (e.g.
hectares, boats, production lines, kg.).
PRODUCTION CYCLE
• The period during which production occurs (in months to a max.
of one year).
ECONOMIC LIFE
• Number of years of use before an item is replaced.
MAINTENANCE
• The cost incurred in order to maintain an item in working order
(not operating costs).
SALVAGE VALUE
• The value of an item at the end of its economic life.
EXTERNAL RESOURCES
• Resources provided by the supporting fund or project (as loan or
grant).
OWN RESOURCES
• Resources provided by the beneficiaries (community or group
applying for assistance).
INVESTMENT COST
• Cost of establishing the project, repeated only when the item
reaches the end of its economic life.
OPERATING COST
• Periodic cost which depends upon the level of activity or scale of
output (e.g. packaging, raw materials, water usage).
3
FIXED OR GENERAL COST
• Periodic cost which does not change as the level of activity or
output changes (e.g. management, land tax, office expenses).
DIRECT BENEFICIARY STEP 3

• Supplier, employee or client of a project and its services or pro-
ducts.
SALES UNIT
• Unit of measurement used for sales (kg, box, each, etc.).
TRANSPORT COST
• Cost of transporting one unit of input to the point of use, or one
unit of output to the point of sale.
109
Step 4 Selection of Host

Farm and Preparation
of Learning Site
3
Purpose Select a host farmer.
3
S TEP 4
STEP 1
Prepare a learning site.
Main Outputs 1. Host farmer selected

2. Preparation of learning site started
Time Estimate One to two weeks
Important Points 1. Nomination of host farmers.

Read aloud the “Host Farmer Agreement” and the
selection criteria to the members.
Do not rush the selection of the host farmer; facilitators
should provide a week for the group to find good
candidates for the selected enterprises and the
learning sites.
Host farmers may want to provide poor quality (waste)
land. Make sure that the land is suitable for developing
a PCE.
2. Selection of host farmer.

Always carry out site visits to compare possible sites and
examine feasibility, and prepare site designs for the
selected enterprises as well as for the learning site.
Check the soil and land characteristics. If these are
identified as too poor to support the selected enterprise,
advise farmers not to select the land as the host farm.
Select the host farmer in a democratic way to avoid
unnecessary group conflicts in the future.
Identify farmers who live in an area with easy access for
the majority of the group members; this helps to
maintain group activities.
3
continued
3. Host farm and learning site.
If possible, locate the learning site in the same place
as the enterprise site for ease of carrying out
STEP 4
learning activities.
4. Size of host farms.

Do not make a host farm too big. The cost of the
establishment should not be too high; if it is too
expensive, members may think that they could not copy
the enterprises in their own farm without help from other
sources.
5. Seating material.
The groups should be advised to use locally available
materials as much as possible in preparing the
learning site.
6. Provision of shelter.
Advise groups to construct a temporary roof or establish
suitable seating under a tree to avoid rain and direct
sunlight.
7. Physical problems for learning sites.

The most common problems of leaning sites are the
lack of a flat area and shade. They are often covered
with bushes; good sites are often already allocated for

agricultural activities.
3
STEP 4
8. Unwillingness to use local available material.
Some groups are unwilling to use local materials. They
often think that implementing agencies should bring
modern materials.
Sequence of 1. Nomination of host farmers.

Activities Review of the “Host Farmer Agreement” and criteria for
the selection of a Host Farmer to provide clear guidance
on responsibilities of being a host farmer.
Provide poor examples of host farmers.
Nominate host farmer candidates who are well accepted
by community members.
2. Identification of the potential enterprise site and learning site.

Visit proposed sites to confirm availability of the land and
suitability of size and shape for the selected enterprises
and learning site.
3. Selection of host farmers.

Review the criteria again.
Select the Host Farmer.
4. Design of leaning site.

Prepare a design for the learning site.
The actual preparation of the Learning Site is done after the

session as homework for the groups before the following
sessions.
3
continued
STEP 4
Lessons Learned
Typical Layout of FFS learning site
5. Host farmer agreement.

Signing of agreement between the host farmer and
the group.
1. Characteristics of good host farm.

Site suitable for the selected enterprise;
Site with good security so that crops are not stolen or
destroyed (presence of host farmers at the host farm to
provide security);
Free access guaranteed for the members by the
agreement and bylaws;
Water availability for tree nursery;
Enough space for holding FFS sessions; and
Host farmer:
. Respected by community members; and
. Willing to hold field day for other community members.
. What do you expect from this enterprise?
. What do you expect from this enterprise?
. What do you know about this enterprise?
. What kind of benefits will you get out of this enterprise?
. What is the expected cost of this enterprise?
. What kind of local materials are available for this enterprise?
. When do you expect to have the first crop from this
enterprise?
. What kind of pests and diseases do you have locally?

. What kind of problems have you encountered in your
3
farm activities? STEP 4
. What limitations do you face in carrying out this enterprise?
. Is there a market available for the products produced in
this enterprise?
1. Dealing with jealousy toward host farmers.

Sometime, facilitators may encounter conflicts among
members due to jealousy toward host farmers.
Establishment of multiple host farmers could be advised
only if:
. the group selects two to three enterprises at the same
time; and,
. the location of the second/third enterprise sites are close
to the learning site.
Do not allow members to get the impression that they are
working for the host farmers.
Stress the responsibility of being the host farmer.
2. Selection of host farmer.

Make sure the selection is carried out based on the merits
of collective learning, and not for the benefit of the host
farmer.
Host Farmer selection is different from the selection of
enterprises. Facilitators should provide to the groups as
much advice as needed.
The process of selecting an appropriate host farmer also
helps groups to establish equal partnerships among
members, which ultimately would undermine any attempt
at dominance by the group leader.
3. Gender and Host Farmers.

Land ownership: there are cases where a woman may not
be in a position to decide on providing land for the group
host farm.
3
continued
4. Learning site.
Farmers can be very innovative in preparing learning
sites; encourage the use of local material.
STEP 4
Home Work 1. Preparation of the leaning site.

Clearing of bushes.
Ground levelling.
Arrange comfortable seating arrangements: e.g.
benches (where applicable).
Preparation of two stand frames for presentations and
display of the timetable.
Construction of temporary shade or roof.
Learning site preparation might take more than a day,

especially preparing the seating arrangement and roofing.
These constructions should be undertaken in parallel with
other activities.
Learning Site
3
Seating Arrangement
STEP 4
STEP 1
Temporary Roofing Structure

3
Necessary Items
for Learning Site
STEP 4
Prepare or find locally the following items to allow FFS sessions to run
properly.
A Large Board for pinning Flip Charts, News Print and the Timetable.
A table turned on its side can also be used.
A Clock is needed for effective time management during FFS sessions

since many members do not have watches.
Many FFS groups meet under

a big tree
3
Sample for Host Farmer Agreement
STEP 4
STEP N.5-6-7-8 Prove ARRI impaginato 15/01/12 10.45 Pagina 118
119
Step 5 Farm Enterprise

Planning
3
STEP 5
Purpose A FFS participatory planning process where the group

members learn the skills of designing enterprises and
prepare a proposal for the selected enterprises.
Main Outputs 1. Participatory comparative experiment (PCE) design.

2. Enterprise and PCE proposal.
Time Estimate 1st week: PCE design and site clearing.

2nd week: Layout and adjustment of the PCE design.
3rd week: Preparation and submission of Enterprise proposal.
Important 1. PCE design.

Points The PCE designs in the enterprise catalogue are just
examples. FFS and Facilitators could modify them or
develop new ones according to local conditions.
Members’ interests vary, but there should be a focus on
the issues identified in the PCE design and discussions.
Make sure that at least one person in each sub group
understands the concept of PCE and ask them to share
with members who are not clear about the concept.
Use the local language as much as possible in
explaining the concept of the PCE design.
Reduce costs by promoting the use of local materials.
Enhance members’ planning skills.
Consider the size and cost of each enterprise; the higher
the cost, the less it might be replicated by the FFS
members, if investment funds are not made available by
the project.
Identify existing traditional technologies and include
them in the PCE.
3
continued
2. Adjustment of PCE design.
Adjust the prepared PCE design according to land size
and characteristics before preparing the Enterprise and
STEP 5
PCE proposal.
3. Availability of materials.
High quality seedlings, especially fruit seedlings, may not
be available at the time of planting. Therefore, it is
important for the project management to estimate the
number of seedlings required for the year and procure
enough seedlings prior to receiving the PCE proposals.
Varieties of agricultural seeds necessary for the enterprise
trial may not be available in local towns. In addition,
some crop varieties recommended by agricultural
officers may not be available in small quantities. Thus,
facilitators must conduct market research to find out the
availability of seed varieties.
4. Timing of delivery.
The rain may not start when expected before planting.
As a precaution, seedlings should be delivered to one of
the members’ homesteads (preferably host farmer) so
that they will be taken care of until they are planted.
5. Other problems.
Some varieties available in local markets, especially fruit
tree seedlings such as grafted mangoes, may not have the
name of the varieties. Facilitators need to ensure that the
varieties used in the PCE are identified prior to purchasing.
Facilitators must ensure that all materials are correctly
labelled, and delivered in both quality and quantity.
Sequence of The purpose of FFS is not only to study the potential enterprise.
Activities It involves comparative experiments between technologies
that the project considers appropriate and those
technologies practiced by farmers based on their experience
and traditional knowledge.
Therefore, the enterprises selected by the FFS must be designed

to measure differences between the two technologies.
3
STEP 5
1. Group exercise: stones and buckets (see page 128).
Members’ exposure to the basic concept of PCE design.
2. PCE design.
Discuss on the PCE design and group contribution.
Conduct participatory soil and topography survey.
Identify existing affordable technologies.
Develop a PCE Design with “Host Farm Design”.
Prepare and submit “Enterprise & PCE Proposal”.
An example of a PCE design

Melia intercropping with Maize
3. Site clearing.
Discuss of the site clearing.
4. Layout of host farm.

Boundary marking at the host farm.
3
continued
5. Adjustment of PCE design.
Review and adjust PCE to reflect the measurement in the
STEP 5 host farm design to the PCE proposal.
6. Discussion of ploughing.
Discuss on ploughing. If the group decides to plough the
site, ask them to identify owners of oxen to plough the
host farm.
7. Development of enterprise and PCE proposal

Prepare the enterprise and PCE Proposal under group
members’ collaborative efforts.
8. Submission of enterprise and PCE proposal (see page 130).

Submit the proposal to the field coordinator.
Review the proposal in relation to the preliminary
procurement plans. Facilitators should make sure that all
material necessary for the enterprise establishment is
procured and delivered before the planting season starts.
9. Procurement of enterprise learning material.

Cross check the design with the PCE Proposal;
facilitators/ group leaders procure materials to be used
in the FFS.
10. Delivery of materials (see page 131).

Confirm delivery of material with the signature of the
chairperson on the delivery note.
Lessons Learned 1. PCE design.

Farmers are knowledgeable. Do not underestimate them
in designing the PCE.
Farmers have their own coping strategies against natural
hazards and disasters, which should be incorporated into
the PCE design.
The facilitator should be well conversant with the
methodology of the PCE Design and host farm design;

the facilitators should continue to study subjects that are
3
frequently asked by their FFS members. STEP 5
2. Site preparation.
Site preparation could take several weeks depending on
the condition of the host farm. It is recommended that
the site clearing should start as early as possible and
continue as homework for the FFS.
3. Late delivery.
Late delivery is a serious setback for FFS activities.
Therefore, careful planning is always required and
procurement should start as early as possible.
Bulky seedlings such as mangoes could be difficult for
facilitators to transport. It is important to organize logistics
for the successful delivery of material needed for PCE.
3 Participatory Comparative
Experiments
STEP 5
What is participatory comparative experiment?
A Participatory Comparative Experiment (PCE) is a way to examine

issues related to agro ecology and interactions of plants with the
environment, including pests and diseases, through a simple
comparative study. It aims to facilitate farmers in learning principles
of experimentation, the design of a field study, and M&E methods for
analysis of experimental results. It is expected that through the
practices of monitoring the PCE would also enhance farmers’
capacity in observational and analytical skills in their farm practice.
The development of farmers’ capacity in planning and assessing
experiments for new ideas and technologies would also be
anticipated in the PCE design.
Why does a comparative study help farmers?
PCE tries to make visible the results of experiments by comparing two

sets of treatments – improved and traditional. It is usually difficult for
farmers to recognize differences or advantages of a recommended
or research proven method when there is no visual comparison. It
becomes clearer if different treatments (practice options) are laid out
side by side and compared for the performance of growth in case of
introducing, for example, a new variety or type of crop husbandry.
The same approach can be applied for other subjects such as tree
growth performance, e.g. with and without treatment of seeds.
3
STEP 5
Important principles in PCE experiment.

PCE experiments should be simple but give reliable results;
Experiments should compare one parameter at a time;
PCE should be managed and evaluated by farmers themselves;
Benefits from the PCE should be for all FFS members and not only
for one or a few members;
PCE should be designed with no risks involved for the
participants; and
Facilitators should consult with local researchers or colleagues to
seek advice on the facilitation in designing a PCE.
Steps in developing the PCE.

Once all principles are well understood and accepted by the FFS
members, and a type of PCE is identified, the following steps can be
taken to design the PCE:
Identify and prioritise the problems to be addressed;
Identify possible solutions with locally available technology;
Identify treatments;
Design a simple experiment with a defined time frame;
Identify materials required and identify local suppliers; and
Develop a budget.
3
Comparative study in PCE.
When comparing new technologies, you should set a conventional
method as a control, which will provide a gauge to measure what is
“Improved” in the new technologies – between “Farmer Practice”
STEP 5 vs. “Improved Practice”. The following are typical comparative
design elements:
Treated seeds vs. Not treated (control);

Traditional ways vs. New technology;
Conventional vs. Facilitator recommended; and
Common variety vs. New variety.
PCE Proposal Preparation

Upon concluding the discussions on PCE, ideas generated by FFS
3
members will be translated into an “Enterprise & Learning Proposal” STEP 5
and “Host Farm Design” (see the following templates). The purpose of
the enterprise & learning proposal is to plan for procurement and
delivery of learning material. The proposal must specify items in
quantity, types and cost. The members should be clear about the PCE
experiment that they will conduct at the host farm and the design of
the experiment.
Each group should assess the total cost with the assistance of the
facilitator. The FFS group should contribute in providing locally
available material to lower the enterprise total cost. In this way
participating farmers can replicate the same activities with lower cost
by using local material on their own farms. Saving of funds would also
benefit the members because they could try more PCE within the limits
of the allocated budget.
Learning material listed in the proposal will be submitted to the field

coordinator for approval. The FFS should coordinate with the field
coordinator if any items to be procured require vehicle transportation.
A copy of the proposal will be retained by the group for verification
when the learning materials are delivered. In case a proposal is found
to be inappropriate or not clear, it will be sent back to the group for
adjustment and re submission.
3 Group Exercise: Stones

& Buckets
STEP 5
Objectives.
To learn the importance of some basic principles of
experimentation;
To relate the practice to PCE; and
To acquire basics techniques for improved planning, design,
mplementation, and M&E of PCE.
Materials.
Six buckets: four of the same (medium) size, two of different sizes
(one big, one small); and
40 stones.
Procedure.
First throw:
Ask for four volunteers: one per sub group and explain that
these people represent four things that you want to compare;
Give each sub group 10 stones each;
Explain to the groups that the objective is to find out who is the
best at throwing stones in a bucket;
Assign one person with the big bucket, one person with the
small bucket and two persons with the medium size buckets;
Ask them to throw the stones into the assigned buckets from the
same distance; and
3
The one who gets the most stones in the buckets wins the game.
Discussion:
Ask the members whether the game is fair?
If the answer is “Not Fair” ask why not? STEP 5
Second throw:
Re distribute the stones;
Assign everybody with the same size buckets;
Ask them to throw the stones into the buckets;
The one who gets the most stones in the buckets wins the game;
Repeat the game once or twice more to show that people
don't always have the same scores; and
Calculate the average score for each person and then declare
the winner.
Key Lessons of this practice.

Simple treatment
. While you plan to compare something in an experiment,
always think whether other factors/parameters are equal, e.g.
size of the farm plot, Number of trees, soil type, slope,
presence of water or runoff channels etc.
No measurement = No analysis
. You cannot analyze the result of the PCE Experiment without
measuring: growth, yield, duration, etc. (the PCE is monitored
by taking crop/tree measurements through weekly
AESA sessions).
Preparation of PCE design
. Do not put many parameters in one experiment. One
parameter (or two at most) in an experiment is appropriate.
More parameters are too complicated for participants
to analyse.
3
STEP 5
Cost covered by the Project Ksh
Cost covered by the Group Ksh
Total cost for enterprise Ksh

DELIVERY NOTE 3
STEP 5
Name of the Group ………………………………………...........................................................
Please, receive the following goods in good order and condition.
ITEM QUANTITY Price (Ksh)
Delivered by………………………..…………………………..…………………………..…...........
Received the above goods in good order and condition.
Received by ………………………..… Signature …………………………………….
Designation …………………………… Date …………………………………………...

133
Step 6 Enterprise
Establishment
3
STEP 6
Purpose Preparation of sites for group activities.
Main Outputs Prepared enterprise site
Time Estimate Two weeks
Important Points 1. Land preparation.

It takes time to prepare land. Careful planning is
therefore important.
Land preparation should be completed before the
planting season begins.
2. Difficult terrain.
In case of difficult terrain at the host farm, start
preparation well in advance to ensure preparation is
completed in time.
Plots on sloping areas might require terracing.
3. Use of water in preparing holes.

When the top soil is too hard to dig, water the area the
night before to make hole digging easier.
4. Participation.
Full participation of members is crucial.
5. Material.
Planting materials need to be provided. But ask the
members to bring their own tools. Farmers often
demand new tools to establish enterprises.
6. Knowledge.
Proper spacing knowledge for agricultural crops and
trees is required.
3
continued
Facilitators should have proper knowledge on
species selection.
STEP 6
Sequence of Sequence of enterprise preparation will be different in each

Activities PCE design. The following is a typical farm forest enterprise site
preparation.
1. Land levelling and measurement.

Measure the land based on the PCE design.
2. Ploughing.
Plough if necessary.
3. Staking out.
Staking out the plot boundaries will be done according
3
to the spacing indicated in the Host Farm Design. Stakes STEP 6
and tape measures should be made available.
4. Pitting.
Size of pits for trees varies depending on the type of trees
to be planted; i.e. larger water harvesting structures for
fruit trees.
Pits will be refilled later with soil (mix with manure if it
is possible).
3
continued
5. Construction of structure for a PCE.
A PCE can be applied to measure any variable. An
STEP 6 example below is a chicken coop to measure the
differences between improved variety and traditional
chickens in terms of number of eggs produced and
growth rates.
Lessons Learned 1. Host farm land preparation.

Land preparation for a host farm could take several
weeks depending on the condition of the site. Careful
planning is required to avoid time conflicts. Remember
that the time of a FFS session is very short (3 4
hours/week) so FFS groups should continue to prepare
the site as homework, outside of the regular group
sessions.
Keep in mind that the role of facilitator is not to work
together with the members; they should focus on
providing technical inputs.
Fencing for the protection of planted seedlings
Farm enterprises should be designed with protective hedges. For

3
example pigeon peas lines can be planted around the plot; this
STEP 6
temporary “live fence” protects the enterprise in the plots from
animal grazing until the crop is harvested. Post harvest grazing
can cause a lot of damage to the enterprise and it is thus
important to ensure protection at all times. Whole farm or
individual tree fencing must be constructed before the plot
becomes open to animal grazing, especially in the dry season.
Protective line planting by pigeon peas (left)

and live fence for whole plots
Individual fencing of trees showing firm structure and no

disturbance for tree development
139
Step 7 FFS Weekly Session
3
STEP 7
Purpose Accumulation of experience by participating farmers

through analysis of comparative studies involving
different topics.
Main Outputs 1. Weekly report prepared by both the group and facilitator
2. Monthly report prepared by the facilitator
Important Points 1. Timetable.

The FFS weekly session timetable should not change
frequently. Once the timetable is agreed upon, it should
be followed and respected until the harvest of crops.
The timetable must be displayed every session and a
clock provided for timekeeping. The timetable should
be separately displayed in front of the FFS members. It
should not be put over the AESA presentation board.
2. Participation.
Full participation of members is a “must”. Facilitators
ensure that sub group leaders encourage their
members to participate proactively.
3. Facilitation material for special topics.

Facilitators must prepare enough facilitation materials
for weekly special topics.
Special topics should be prepared based on requests by
3
continued
group members, or the facilitator may have a topic that
s/he would wish to introduce for the benefit of the group.
STEP 7
4. Arrangement of resource persons.
If the budget permits, facilitators are requested to look for
local resource persons to cover some of the special topics.
5. Reporting.
Reporting by facilitators and the group is the key for
monitoring progress and identifying problems. Payment
of allowances to facilitators should be tied to timely
delivery of reports by them.
Sequence of 1. Weekly FFS group activities.

Activities A typical example of a FFS session timetable is as below.
TIME ACTIVITY RESPONSIBLE

PERSONS
08:00 08:05 Prayer, Roll Call Host team
08:05 08:10 Brief Recap Host team
08:10 08:40 AESA Taking All
09:10 09:40 AESA Processing All
09:40 10:10 AESA Presentation All/Host team
10:10 10:30 Group Dynamics Host team
10:30 11:30 Today’s Topic/ Facilitator

Special Topic
11:30 11:35 Review of the Host team

day’s activities
11:35 11:45 Planning of Next week Host team
11:45 11:50 Announcements Host team
11:50 11:55 Roll Call, Prayer Host team
The members meet on an agreed day and usually

conduct a 3 4 hour learning session. Like a regular
school, FFS has its own schedule and timetable. The

timetable must be agreed among the members. It also
3
identifies the person who is responsible for each activity. STEP 7
Lessons Learned 1. AESA.

AESA is the key activity in FFS and thereforethe
management must make sure that AESA is
properly conducted.
At the end of AESA presentations by the subgroups, the
facilitator should wrap up, summarising each
presentation and help members to draw more
accurate conclusions.
AESA for food crops should be done weekly, but AESA for
trees can be done bi weekly or monthly since trees grow
more slowly and changes on a weekly basis may not
be significant.
2. Recap.
Before starting the activities of the day, a recap session
should be held to review the previous week session. Every
week the role of Host Team rotates. The previous week’s
Host Team should review the session and summarize key
findings according to the timetable.
The host team can summarise step by step following the
items on the timetable from the previous week. The
recap should not take more than 5 minutes.
3. Literacy.
At least one or two people in each sub group should be
literate. Sub group formation should thus be well
managed to distribute literate persons to each group.
If literacy level is low, group members could take a long
time to write and understand reports without assistance.
Use more drawings than words on the AESA sheet for
these situations.
Use the local language, dynamics and songs to express
3
continued
difficult concepts and to help illiterate people
understand them better.
STEP 7
4. General.
Facilitators should not hurry the groups to make progress.
When members encounter problems facilitators should
guide them in a way that encourages self discovery
among members. Facilitators should avoid giving direct
answers and opinions as this undermines the learning
process. It is critical to let farmers understand by
themselves. It is OK to have a repeat session in the next
week FFS.
There is always a reason for any decline in membership.
The field coordinator should visit such groups and consult
members early enough to find out the reasons and take
action if needed. If the members are inclined to stop
their participation in FFS, the facilitators and field
coordinators should respect their decision; it is not
desirable to convince them to continue in the FFS.
Facilitators must arrive at the FFS learning site prior to the
time of FFS session. It has been observed that FFS groups
whose facilitators are not punctual have more problems
in members’ participation.
Agro-Ecosystem Analysis:
AESA 3
STEP 7
AESA is a comprehensive on farm monitoring and evaluation

method for crops/trees and it is the cornerstone of the FFS. It involves:
Regular (weekly/biweekly) observations of the crops/trees;

Data collection for growth assessment and analysis of
comparative experiments;
Close observation of the interaction between tree/crops and
other biotic/a biotic factors coexisting in the field;
Critical analysis of field observations; and
Decision making by farmers through collective discussion.
The AESA process can be tedious work for the members and requires
concentration. If both members and the facilitators are not
committed, it would result in poor quality FFS and not help farmers.
The members need to receive encouragement from facilitators until
they are used to the activities.
Even without AESA FFS will be able to show how to grow crops. When
conducted without AESA, however, farmers may not acquire skills of
monitoring the farm regularly, observing the crops systematically, and
practicing critical analysis. As a result of failure to build AESA skills, they
would not be able to build their capacity for informed decision making.
Furthermore, the field observation during AESA leads to presentation
during FFS. Absence of AESA also means that FFS members lose the
opportunity to develop self confidence in presenting their ideas and
findings in front of other people, and making decisions for the next step
as well as selecting solutions collectively.
Thus, the absence of AESA can lead to poor capacity building and
reduced potential for empowerment of the farmers. AESA is thus a
necessary practice and must be conducted at every FFS session until
crop harvest. AESA is the way for the farmers to become Farmer
Experts “No AESA, No Farmer Expert”.
3
Every AESA session as a weekly activity has four steps:
a. AESA taking (field data collection);
b. AESA processing (data analysis);
c. AESA presentation (sharing observations and findings with the
STEP 7 larger group); and
d. AESA synthesis (discussion and decision making).
Sampling of plants.
Two or three plants in each plot/treatment need to be selected as
the sample plants for measurement and observation. The samples
should be marked and monitored until the end of FFS. If the selected
plants become damaged, resample other plants using the same
methods. There are several ways of sampling:
Random sampling by throwing stones backwards (see the

picture below).
Selection with a pre determined number: randomly pick a
number and count plants from the corner of a block. If the
randomly selected number is “4” for example, every “4th” plant is
selected.
Selective sampling from good, medium and low performance
populations: e.g. one from upper part of good growth, one from
lower part of low growth and one from mid part.
Random sampling method by throwing stones backwards

(Somali Land, by T. K. Mutinda)
3
AESA taking.
The sub groups carry out AESA taking. Field observation and data
collection are conducted during the AESA taking. At the early
stages, facilitator should introduce and emphasise AESA taking
methods until someone in a sub group understands what is required. STEP 7
It is important that all members of the sub group participate. Lack of
sub groups would result in a situation where some members have
nothing to do and eventually reduce the level of participation.
The host team or the facilitator assigns each sub group a plot based
on the PCE design. Each sub group then goes to the field and
records measurements, field observations and results including:
Growth measurement of the plants;

Pests and friendly insects & their populations;
Weeds & their coverage;
Disease / pests & their significance;
Soil conditions: dry, moist, wet, etc.;
Weather: sunny, windy, rainy, cloudy, etc.; and
Overall plant health for the particular stage.
It is recommended that each sub group carries a small notebook to

record the above mentioned data in the field. Every week, each
group should be assigned different plots to measure so that all
members are exposed to the different plots (PCEs).
AESA taking on agriculture crops (Maize)

and fruits trees (Mango)
3
STEP 7
AESA taking on tree seedlings in nursery enterprises
AESA taking on forest tree enterprises: Melia volkensii (left) and

Eucalyptus spp. (right)
It is common that some sub groups may want to skip the AESA
taking, saying “there is no point in measuring plants and we just want
to see the growth of plants.” Keep in mind that the objective of
taking measurements in AESA is not only data collection. The
following are some of the reasons to advocate in taking the
measurements of plants:
To compare growth between the different treatments;

To understand the growth process of the plants; and
To observe the plants closely.
3
Often members find pests and diseases as well as friendly insects
while they are measuring plants.
It is also important that the members do not mix this activity with
other farm activities: e.g. weeding, and watering, while taking AESA. STEP 7
Farm work should be decided through the AESA presentation session,
after which members share what is happening in the host farm and
agree what they have to do prior to such actions.
Timekeeping is very important during AESA taking because members

may forget the time as they concentrate on observation and
measurement.
AESA Processing.
Field observation data are analyzed and compiled on the AESA
chart for presentation, discussions and informed decision making. All
sub group members who collected field data should sit together
during AESA processing to reflect on their findings and opinions. The
AESA chart has eight sections as shown below.
1. Introduction: introductory information including the name of

FFS, name of sub group, AESA number, week number, date;
2. General Information: Species/varieties, methods of
establishment, treatment, date of sowing/planting, weather,
time of observation, etc.;
3. AESA Data: Measuring parameters including height,
circumference, width of leaves, length of leaves, number of
branches, etc. as agreed with members:
4. Plant drawings;
5. Pests;
6. Friendly insects;
7. Observations; and
8. Recommendations.
3 General
Introduction
AESA Data
information
STEP 7
Plant Friendly
Pests Drawings Inserts
Observation Recommendations
Structure of AESA Chart (Left). Mango trees (Right) showing newly

sprouted leaves with light green colour without any verbal or written
descriptions.
The AESA chart can be simplified according to members’ literacy

level. If many members have problems in writing, more time may be
needed to prepare. A change of the structure is allowed to, for
example, include more drawings than text. However, new facilitators
should ask experienced facilitators what to omit or change.
AESA charts are better to be visual with fewer words which are
easier for everyone to understand. It is also possible to put live
specimens on the chart and use colours/crayons for drawing. Visual
AESA charts can help illiterate members to increase their
participation in the discussion.
Members’ proactive participation (Left). Illiterate members (behind

left) are not integrated in the AESA processing (right)
3
Illiterate members tend to sit at the back and do not participate in the
AESA processing. Even if they cannot write, illiterate members may be
able to draw pictures and they can also comment on the drawing.
STEP 7
A FFS facilitator asking illiterate members’ opinions to integrate into

AESA chart (Ethiopia)
When facilitators observe poor integration of members in AESA

taking and processing, they should act swiftly and facilitate sub
group members to work together suggesting some roles for illiterate
people including drawing pictures, preparing live specimens,
contributing to discussions and preparing recommendations.
Timekeeping is also important during AESA processing. Some sub

groups may take a longer time in the preparation and must learn to
process activities within a set time. It is recommended to refer to
previous AESA exercises, but copying previous AESA charts is not
permitted.
3
Simplified AESA Chart
STEP 7
AESA Presentation.
After compiling field information into an AESA chart, the Host Team
facilitates the AESA presentations session and discussion to agree
further actions on the PCE. Each representative of every sub group
presents their findings displayed on the AESA chart. Every week, the
presenter is rotated within the sub group. Women and illiterate
members are usually shy and may not want to present. However,
these people should be encouraged to do so because presentation
of the AESA is as an opportunity for them to build self confidence.
After each presentation, a Q&A session follows.
AESA presentations by the representatives of the week for each

sub-group
3
AESA Synthesis.
After sub groups presentations, the facilitator conducts a discussion
session. If some action is required such as eliminating pests, applying
chemicals, etc, the facilitator leads the discussion and asks members
to decide on actions required. Then, the facilitator wraps up the STEP 7
discussion and summarises the lessons learnt and decisions made. The
Host Team must be aware that the learning/discussion and major
decisions of the week will be presented during the following week’s
recap session. The AESA processes should be concluded within the
same day. AESA is not only for observation and data collection but
also involves farm condition analysis and immediate action planning
for farm management. It must end with decisions related to farm
management for the day.
Finally, the presented AESA charts should be stored securely for future
use and analysis. The data will be used at the time of the PCE analysis
as well as for presentation on field days or graduation ceremonies.
3 Group Dynamics
STEP 7
FFS involves certain team building activities known as group
dynamics. Most folk media and other communication methods can
be used as group dynamics. Types of common dynamics usually
observed in FFS sessions are:
Clapping
Songs
Poems
Dances
Proverbs/Parables
Riddles
Stories
Drama/Role Play
Taking Tea or Coffee
Others
“Clapping” is commonly used in FFS sessions to get the attention of

the participants.
Songs (left) and dances (right) in Group Dynamics

3
STEP 7
Riddles (left) and story telling (right)
Milk tea (Kenya) and Coffee with salt (Ethiopia)

during Group Dynamics time
As shown in the typical timetable above, there is an item in the

programme allocated for group dynamics. Many people enjoy this
time to relax and it increases the coherence of group. The type and
content of the dynamics will vary from group to group; it depends on
the creativity of members and their respective talents. Innovation for
the dynamics or diversification of existing ones should be encouraged.
In creating group dynamics it is important to add messages that

reflect FFS learning. In most FFS groups there is an FFS song that
includes messages containing the FFS principles (See Part I). Story
telling and drama also contribute to sharing important learning
experiences. Group dynamics also help illiterate people to
understand key learning experience and concepts.
3 Today’s Topic (Special Topics)
STEP 7
The “Topic of the Day” is a session designed to provide members with
knowledge and technical input. It is also referred to as “Special
Topic”, because it introduces many different topics not necessarily
related to FFS and may include health, social and cultural topics.
Usually a special topic session lasts for 30 minutes to one hour. In order
to make it more participatory, facilitators are encouraged to use
sub group discussions and other facilitation skills.
FFS encourages “learning by doing” and “discovery based learning”

where new knowledge is acquired through observation and hands
on experience. However, there is a limitation of the knowledge
members can acquire during FFS; subjects that are not related to
PCE would not normally be discussed unless such subjects are
presented to the members. Special topic sessions aim to reduce such
gaps by introducing the basics of many different learning subjects.
There are two categories for special topics: (i) enterprise related
topics, and (ii) non enterprise related topics.
1. Enterprise Related: Related to Implementation of On-going

Enterprises.
The Today’s Topic is usually related to enterprises including forestry
and agricultural production systems. It can cover land
preparation, nursery development, seed sowing, etc. For example,
if a group is practising transplanting of seedlings, facilitators may
want to discuss the subject prior to the day of the practise. Timely
introduction of a new concept during special topic sessions one
week before the actual practise session in FFS is encouraged in
order to familiarize the members with the subject.
Furthermore, members may encounter problems in their

enterprises. In order to facilitate their discussion and provide
basic knowledge related to the problems, facilitators may want
to use special topic sessions for such issues. If a problem is
3
beyond knowledge of the facilitator, the FFS can invite a
specialist in the subject, if resources are available.
2. Non Enterprise Related: Needs of members.

Any subject can be introduced depending on the interests of the STEP 7
members. The aim is to provide the members with opportunities to
learn about different subjects, which could help them in their
livelihood and production systems.
3 Other Key Activities during

Weekly Sessions
STEP 7
Review of the day’s activities.

Review and summarise the session at the end of the day to refresh FFS
learning. This helps members to gain the correct perspective of the
learning process for the day and contributes to capacity building.
Planning for next week and homework.

It is crucial to plan the activities for the next week’s session.
Sometimes actual farm activities including watering, weeding,
tending may not be practiced during the FFS session. If something
must be done in the field an assignment is given to selected
members. It has to be discussed and agreed by the members.
Announcements.
Announcements including arrival of guests or communal events can
be introduced at the end of each session. This will contribute to the
better planning of FFS activities.
Weekly report.
After each FFS session, the FFS group should prepare a “Group
Weekly Report”. It is the members’ joint responsibility to describe the
contents of the day’s activities in the report. The report will be used
for M&E of FFS and facilitators’ performance by the FFS
management and therefore facilitators should not fill the report. In
addition, it aims to:
monitor the visit by facilitators;

capture how the session was conducted: problems, impressions
of members;
check relevance of sessions; and
record the activities.
If the mobile phone monitoring system is not available, the Weekly

Report must be carbon copied; the original to be collected from the
3
group by the field coordinator during routine backstopping visit and
sent to the FFS management and a copy remains with the FFS (see
the next section). Allowances paid to facilitators are recorded by
members in the report which allows the group to appreciate the cost
of extension service. STEP 7
3 FFS check sheet
STEP 7 Does your Group perform the following main FFS

Activities?
1. AESA
AESA Taking AESA Processing AESA Presentation
2. Group dynamics 3. Special topic
Are there FFS Is the special topic

messages in the based on group
group dynamics? members’ request?
Are sub-groups working well?

1. All FFS members are divided into sub-groups?
2. Does the total number of PCE match with the total number
of Sub-groups?
- Is each sub-group responsible for a PCE?
3. Does the FFS have the Host Team?
Are they participating in AESA?

Why are they looking at their colleagues?
Are AESA sheets prepared properly?

Incorrect AESA Preparation Basic AESA Format 3
STEP 7
Why are these considered as

incorrect?
How can you improve these?
Do you have appropriate PCE?
Examples of nursery PCE Farm Forestry PCE
Germination PCE Seedling growth PCE PCE on Timber

A. Hot water Different sized species planting in
pre treatment poly tubes agricultural crop
B. Control A. 4×6 cm, B. 5×8 cm, plots
(no treatment) C. 6×9 cm
Grafting PCE Fodder Bank PCE
A B
A. Scion with protection

B. Scion without protection Performation of Spp. A and B
161
Step 8 Tree Nursery

Enterprise Planning
and Establishment 3
STEP 8
Purpose Group members learn planning, designing and

establishment of a nursery enterprise.
Main Outputs 1. Nursery PCE designs prepared

2. Nursery established
Time Estimate 1. Establishment: two weeks

2. Operation of nursery: until the end of FFS
Important Points 1. Setting up rules for nursery maintenance.

Watering seeds and seedlings is the most important
activity in maintaining the nursery. The facilitators should
assist the members to make rules for maintenance of
their tree nursery.
2. Availability of water.
The availability of water is an essential criterion when
selecting the host farmer.
3. Proper planning in seedling production.

Facilitators must provide a clear schedule to group
members on the timing of seedling production.
4. Clear objective setting.

Facilitators must discuss with the members to agree on
the objectives of the tree nursery enterprise.
5. Dealing with high expectation to produce as many

seedlings as possible.
When group members have high expectations for the
tree nursery, they tend to focus on producing as many
seedlings as possible. Facilitators should differentiate
3
continued
between the learning process (involving PCE and AESA)
and group income generation. The material given to
FFSs would not be sufficient to allow for sales. The two
STEP 8
objectives should be balanced.
If the nursery has a ready market, plan carefully for the
level of the production. Then the cost of inputs should be
shared among the members.
6. Responsibility of host farmer.

FFS members are permitted to have free access to the
tree nursery during the learning period.
Community members are accepted to visit the farm to
see the result of comparative study e.g. during Field Day.
FFS members share tree nursery products including
scions for grafting.
Sequences of After AESA on crops/trees as well as other livelihood

Activities development enterprises becomes routine, a tree nursery
enterprise can be started as the second/third FFS enterprise.
1. Expectation analysis: levelling members’ expectation.

Expectation session with leading questions (below)
enables group members to identify issues and problems
in carrying out the nursery enterprise.
• What do you expect from the nursery enterprise?

• What do you know of nursery enterprises?
• What benefits will you get out of the nursery enterprise?
• What is the expected cost of the nursery enterprise?
• What local materials are available for the nursery
enterprise?
• When do you expect to have first seedlings from this
enterprise?
• What pests and diseases do you have locally for small
scale nurseries?
Host farmer
consents that:
• How many members have nurseries and what problems
3
- FFS members have you encountered previously?
are permitted to
STEP 8
• What limitations do you face in carrying out nursery
have free access
to the tree enterprises?
nursery during • Why have you not started a nursery before?
the learning
period; • Is there an available market for the seedlings
- community produced in this group nursery?
members are
accepted to visit
the farm to see
the result
of comparative 2. Host farm and tree nursery site selection.
study e.g. during Discuss in general suitable sites for tree nurseries.
Field Day.
- FFS members
Identify basic requirements for a suitable nursery site which
share tree nursery should have easy access to water and a fence to protect
products
against animal browsing (homework for the group).
including scions
for grafting. Visit previously identified nursery sites.
Select a site and host farm for the group.
Examples of Nursery
Materials: Sign site agreement forms between host farmer and the
• Regular soil group.
• Forest soil
• Manure/
Compost 3. Watering rules.
• Sand
• Farm Establish watering rules (timing and amount) and
Implements for
Nursery rotation of groups to care for seedlings.
• Spades
• Hoes
• Soil Sieve 4. PCE design.
• Sack or buckets Discuss PCE design.
to carry soils
• Rake Discuss group contributions.
• Machetes
• Poly-tubes
Identify existing affordable technologies.
• Local material Develop PCE design
• Cans or plastic
containers for
watering 5. Preparation of nursery site.
seedlings
• Poly-bag or lear the bushes and uproot stumps.
wasted
containers to
Level the ground.
subsidize Poly- Construct a fence resistant to animals (if not already in
tubes for
seedlings place).
3
continued
6. Site design layout.
Prepare nursery layout design.
STEP 8
7. Preparation of enterprise and PCE proposal.

With “A Standard List of Nursery Material and
Procurement Responsibility” (see page 166), identify
material to be provided by the group and procured by
the project.
Prepare and complete the “Enterprise and PCE
Proposal” provided on page 167.
8. Purchase and delivery of nursery materials.

Facilitators and the field coordinator confirm all
3
materials are ready to be purchased and delivered in a
STEP 8
timely manner to their respective groups.
Prepare delivery notes according to the proposal
submitted by the groups.
Group’s members confirm receipt of materials to the
group. The chairperson signs the delivery note.
9. Construction of tree nursery.

Prepare and complete the Enterprise and PCE Proposal.
Lessons Learned 1. Submission of proposal.

Timely action in the planning and preparation of the
nursery enterprise is necessary to ensure that nursery
materials are acquired on time.
2. Group nursery and IGA.

If markets are identified, IGAs, through the selling of
seedlings, should be promoted in the nursery enterprise.
This will encourage members’ proactive learning.
3 A Standard List of Nursery Material and

STEP 8 Procurement Responsibility
Responsibility
Item Quantity Total
Group Project
Regular soil
Forest soil
Manure/compost
Sand
Farm implements for nursery
Spades
Hoes
Soil Sieve
Sack or buckets to carry soil
Rake
Machetes
Poly tubes
Local material
Cans or plastic containers for
watering seedlings
Poly bag or wasted containers to
subsidize poly tubes for seedlings
Total
3
STEP 8
3
STEP 8 Delivery Note
Name of the Group ……………………………………………….........................................................
List of following goods to be delivered in good order and condition.
Item Quantity Price (Ksh)
Delivered by …………………………………………………………………………………………………...
Received the above goods in good order and condition.
Received by ………………………..… Signature …………………………………………….
Designation …………………………… Date …………………………………………….….…

3
STEP 8
STEP 9-10-11-12-13-14 Prove ARRI impaginato 15/01/12 10.25 Pagina 170
171
Step 9 Exchange Visits
3
STEP 9
Purposes Know the activities and performance of other FFS groups

and facilitators.
Provide opportunity for members to undertake self
evaluation compared to the host FFS.
Exchange ideas, techniques and methodologies between
FFS groups and facilitators.
Assist participants to think in new ways.
Main Outputs 1. Exchange Visit report.
Time Estimate Four weeks in total

- 1-3 sessions for preparation including budget
- One session for implementation
- One session for reviewing the visits
Important Points 1. Timing.

The timing of exchange visits must be carefully planned.
If the group organization is weak, earlier timing of an
exchange visit is recommended.
The date of visit should coincide with the day of routine
session for the host FFS.
It is difficult to carry out exchange visits during the rainy
season. Where possible arrange the timing of exchange
visits for drier months.
Based on experience the best timing is when the food
crop has not yet been harvested.
2. Transportation.
The facilitator should make transportation arrangements
well in advance – if necessary.
3
continued
3. Cancellation.
Due to unpredictable events, sometimes planned
STEP 9 exchange visits may be cancelled; e.g. very bad
weather, or a social event such as a funeral affecting the
group that will host the visit.
Communicate well with the host FFS for cancellation and
decide an alternative date if necessary.
4. Arrangement by the Host Groups.

Careful arrangement by the host FFS is necessary to
ensure the exchange visit is successful.
The host group should be ready to receive the group
and proceed with the day’s programme.
Have open time for discussion to exchange ideas and
opinions between the groups.
5. Cost.
Exchange visits can be carried out at low cost by visiting
neighbouring FFSs. Encourage frequent visits to
neighbouring FFSs.
Sequence of 1. Identification of the group to be visited.

Activities Share preliminary agreement/conditions of the project
among members for exchange visits.
Identify an FFS group and date to visit through
group discussion.
2. Preparation of preliminary budget plan and transportation

arrangement.
Facilitators and group leaders prepare budgets.
Submit the budget plan to the project.
Arrange transport – if necessary.
3. Preparation of Exchange Visit Plan (see page 174).

Prepare detailed visit plans including time for departure
and transportation if necessary.
Communicate with the group to be visited either verbally

or in writing.
3
STEP 9
4. Implementation of Exchange Visits.
Implement exchange visits.
5. Review of Exchange Visit (see page 175).

Review the exchange visit and summarise the experience
into the Exchange Visit Report.
Lessons Learned 1. Earlier Planning of Exchange Visits.

The facilitators should initiate early planning to ensure
adequate time for preparation.
2. Voluntary-basis Exchange Visit.

Where possible, exchange visits should be carried out on
a voluntary basis (without financial assistance from the
project) by visiting neighbouring FFSs.
3
STEP 9
3
STEP 9
177
Step 10 Farmer Facilitator

Selection
3
STEP 10
Purposes Select farmer facilitators.
Main Outputs Farmer Facilitators (FFs)
Time Estimate Three weeks: One week for nomination

One week for selection
Training of Facilitator: One week
Important Points 1. Clear explanation of the role.

Facilitators must provide a clear description of the role of
farmer facilitators.
2. Do not select candidates because he/she is

a leader.
Knowledge and facilitation skill is the most important
attribute for being a FF. Therefore, facilitators should
make sure that their group does not select farmer
facilitators simply because they are leaders of the group.
3. Criteria for selection of farmer facilitators.

Level of attendance in FFS;
Level of adoption of PCE in their own farms;
Willingness to contribute their time to run FFS;
Communication skills;
Physical fitness;
Willingness to stay in the community;
Socially accepted by the community; and
Reasonable level of basic literacy.
Sequence of 1. Briefing session for FFs.

Activities Role of Farmer Facilitators and their specific tasks.
3
continued
2. Nomination of candidate.
Nominate several candidates, usually in pair(s).
STEP 10
3. Approval of Groups.
Candidates approved by FFS members.
4. TOF seminar.
A week long Training of Facilitators (TOF).
Written test to evaluate the candidates’ basic level of
FFS knowledge.
5. FFS by Farmer Facilitators.

On the completion of TOF seminar, candidate FF should
facilitate FFS sessions in their mother groups.
6. Farmer Facilitator Evaluation (see page 179).

Evaluation of FFs by facilitators or project staff towards
the end of the FFS (before the graduation).
Those who pass the evaluation will be selected as FFs.
3
STEP 10
181
Step 11 Participatory
Evaluation
3
STEP 11
Purpose Check the progress of members’ learning.

Improve facilitators’ performance and group activities.
Main Outputs 1. Ballot Box exercise report

2. PCE analysis
3. Revised RuralInvest Module 2
4. Cost and benefit analysis report
5. Farm self analysis report
6. Self evaluation report
7. Way forward report
Time Estimate Three to four weeks
Sequence of 1. Ballot Box.

Activities Special topic on ballot box exercise.
Prepare questions (at least 15) on manila papers and
ballot boxes.
Prepare ballot papers according to the number of
members.
Set up appropriate polling stations.
Prepare a ballot box result sheet.
Review questions together after the exercise.
A group member helping an illiterate member to read questions

3
continued
Conduct the ballot box exercise at the beginning of the FFS in
order to measure the knowledge level of FFS members.
STEP 11
2. PCE analysis.
Set up criteria for PCE Analysis.
Implement PCE Analysis by sub groups.
Select best options for their individual farms.
3. Review of RuralInvest Module 2 Profile.

Review the RuralInvest Module 2 Profile based on FFS
experiences and findings to prepare for the following
cost and benefit analysis.
4. Cost and Benefit analysis.

Agree on the plot size to be used in the analysis.
Set up appropriate units, e.g acres, kg, bags, etc.
List inputs and cost.
Extrapolate yields in units.
Reach consensus on the farm gate prices.
Calculate profits / loss per plot.
Rank the plots against profits.
Prepare a report.
5. Farm self-analysis report.

Distribute the report format to the members in order to
have a better understanding of questions.
Sub group discussion.
FFS group discussion.
Compile the report.
6. Self-evaluation report.
Prepare the report.
7. Way-forward report.
3
STEP 11
Prepare the report.
3 What is Participatory
Evaluation?
STEP 11
Participatory Evaluation (PE) entails the active involvement of FFS
members including facilitators in the process of assessing change and
impact. The table below summarizes some of the differences between
conventional evaluation and PE.
Differences between Conventional and Participatory Evaluation
Conventional Participatory
Who External Farmers, Facilitators,

experts. Project staff.
What Predetermined Farmers identify own
indicators. indicators.
How Focus on scientific Self evaluation using
objectivity. simple methods adapted
to local culture.
When Upon completion or Frequent small scale
mid ter. assessment & evaluations.
Why Accountability to To empower local people
funding agencies. to initiate, control and
take corrective action.
The PE helps farmers to increase ownership as a result of activities and

reflect on their performance for progressive improvement. When you
conduct a PE, use Final Session Report (Annex 3 9).
Possible challenges in particpatory evaluation.

PE relies mainly on self evaluation and group discussion. It does not
provide an exact assessment or numerical answer. There are limitations
in the accuracy of data used. In most cases data collection is
retrospective and must be interpreted with caution if used for formal
external analyses. The importance of PE lies in the fact that it facilitates
an evaluation process by the FFS members themselves. It develops
their analytical processes and judgement.
The following are some potential problems, which a facilitator may

experience while conducting a PE:
Farmers may not remember figures well;
3
Farmers tend to overestimate figures; STEP 11
There might be data loss;
Loss of plant or products through pests and animals;
Consumption of the crops before harvesting;
Data analysis can be tedious especially for the first time; and
Illiterate members would require more time.
Participatory evaluation that can be used in FFS.

1. Ballot box exercise report.
2. PCE analysis and field day proposal.
3. RuralInvest Module 2 revised.
4. Cost and benefit analysis report.
5. Farm self analysis report.
6. Self evaluation report.
7. Way forward report.
3 Ballot Box Exercise
STEP 11 Objectives.
Assess whether necessary knowledge and techniques are
effectively transferred to the FFS members through the FFS
sessions; and
Measure FFS members’ level of knowledge before and after
training.
Note for Illiterate People.

Participants do not need to know how to read and/or write to be
able to participate in this activity. Where some participants cannot
read, the facilitator must walk with the illiterates and read out the
questions, preferably in the local language.
Materials.
Manila paper or cardboard;
A whistle;
Marker pens, paper bags, masking
tape, rubber bands, etc.; and
Plastic bags, live, dead or preserved
specimens.
Cut manila papers and prepare the ballot “strings” as below. The
number indicates the ID of each FFS member. For example, if there
are 18 participants, prepare 18 paper ballot strings. Each string
should have one ballot for each question; if there are 15 questions,
each string should be divided into 15 ballots.
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17
18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18
3
Preparation:
1. Prepare 15 to 20 questions focused
on important knowledge and
techniques in regard to the FFS
enterprises and curriculum (see STEP 11
examples of questions below).
2. Prepare ballot boxes with
questions. Try to simplify and use the
least possible number of letters/words. Prepare three pockets
below the question and mark them with multiple choice answers.
The pockets are the ballot boxes into which the FFS members cast
their “ballot” – in the form of their ID number.
3. Display specimens next to the question. This makes the question
clearer, especially for illiterates.
4. Place the questions around the host
farm using poles or by fixing on trees.
Implementation:
1. Assign each participant an ID number
and provide them the ballot string with
this number. Record each participant’s
ID number.
2. Explain to the participants that each
board has a question with three
answers but only one answer is correct.
On each question board they should put their ID number ballot in
the pocket showing their selected answer.
3. Each participant answers separately at each question. Blow the
whistle when the allocated time (1 or 2 minutes per ballot station)
has been reached. Continue the exercise until all participants
have answered every question.
4. Discuss with illiterate members one week before to find a most
comfortable way to help them to undertake this exercise.
Evaluation:
1. After finishing the session, the facilitator will hold a plenary session
with the group asking questions such as:
• How do you feel about this activity?
• What have you learnt from the exercise?
3
• How can we improve the session?
• Did you like to analyse each question?
2. Review the answers for each question while the questions are still
mounted on the board.
STEP 11 3. Analyse the result in the office, evaluate the participants’
performance and prepare a report (Annex 3 9 1).
Notes for Facilitators.

1. The facilitator should prepare the questions at home/office. The
questions must be practical and based on the availability of the
specimens and materials. They should not be formulated from
textbooks.
2. The samples should be fresh/live and maintaining their colours,
with evident symptoms and characteristics.
3. The facilitators should arrive earlier to prepare and collect
specimens on the day of this exercise.
4. If possible, ask for help from a colleague or a farmer facilitator in
undertaking the session.
5. Take care when disclosing the results of the ballot. Do not disclose
to those members who do not want to know the results.
3
Example of Ballot Box Exercise
Cropping Techniques
Which is the proper spacing Who caused this harm STEP 11
for maize? (Drawing/Specimen)
a. 1 X 1 ft a. Stalk Borer
b. 1 X 3 ft b. Lady Bug
c. 3 X 3 ft c. Cut Worm
Fruit Orchard
Which is proper spacing Which is Apple mango?
for mangoes? a. (Specimen) Kent
a. 2 X 2 m b. (Specimen) Apple
b. 5 X 5 m c. (Specimen) Vandyke
c. 7 X 7 m
Grafted mango should be planted:
a b c
Tree Species
Which tree has a lot of branches? Which tree is not termite resistant?
a. Grevillea a. Mukau
b. Senna siamea b. Senna siamea
c. Eucalyptus c. Eucalyptus
Which tree does not coppice? Which fruits are not edible for man?
a. Grevillea a. Bula (Vitex doniana)
b. Eucalyptus b. Mukau
c. Mukau c. Tamerindo
Which tree is not eaten by cattle? Which tree is not eaten by goats?
a. Mukau
a. Mulberry
b. Grevillea
b. Calliandra
c. Eucalyptus
c. Cypress
What is the problem of Mukau?

a. Germination
b. Termites
c. Kukauka rahisi
3
Example of Ballot Box Exercise
Tree Management
STEP 11 Mukau should be planted: If you see buds in Mukau,

what will you do?
a. Toa
b. Acha ikue
a b c c. Piga dawa
Nursery Techniques
Which tree is better for seed
How often do you water
collection?
nursery seedlings?
a. Daily
b. Weekly
c. Monthly
a b c
What is bad for Mango seeds? Which is good for Grevillea Seed?
a. Soak a. Sow dry
b. Cut the seed coat b. Soak
c. Boiling in the water c. Boil in water
How often should you Which is wedge grafting?

do root pruning?
a. Daily
b. Weekly
c. Monthly
a b c
Pest & Diseases
Which one is a pest? Which one is a beneficial insect?
a. Stalk borer a. Grasshopper
b. Bee b. Weevils
c. Earthworm c. Black ants
PTD & AESA

What is not true? PCE is: Which is not true? AESA is:
a. To compare techniques a. To assess development of crop
b. To make better decision b. To find disease and pest
c. To increase workload c. To show the officers
PCE Analysis Session

3
Objectives. STEP 11
To assess and evaluate the result of PCE at the final stage of an
enterprise and enhance members’ capacity to analyse at the end
of FFS. Emphasise:
What has been observed between the plots?
Which one looks better for your farm?
Why do you think so?
Procedure.
PCE analysis sessions should be conducted for each enterprise. This
session can be made in two steps, first identify criteria to evaluate
PCE and secondly do the detailed analysis when the PCE is in the
final stage of development (growth).
Question 1: What difference has been observed between the plots?
Step 1.
Ask each sub group to define their on criteria to evaluate the results
(treated/new technique and control/ traditional) by comparison. Try
not to interfere in the definition of those criteria. Those criteria are
then put in a matrix as below.
Evaluation Criteria/Comparative (Examples)
• Labour
• Farm inputs/chemicals
• Total expense
• No. of plants dried/survival rate
• Health of plants / vitality
• Level of pest / termite attack
• Total yield
• Value of product
• Profit
• Quality of the product
etc.
3
Step 2.
Once each group has their identified criteria, record the analysis for
the plots as shown in the following matrix:
Evaluation Plot 1 Plot 2 Plot 3 Comment

STEP 11 Criteria
Yield
Manure
Fertiliser
etc.
Step 3.
Finally present in the plenary session and let the participants identify
advantages and disadvantages of each plot and treatment. Each
criterion must be analysed and noted in the column for comment.
Discuss among the group why those results came about, and the
benefit and disadvantage of each practice applied in the plots.
Question 2: Which one seems more suitable for your farm?
Question 3: Why do you think so?
Step 4:
Finally discuss how PCE and AESA are contributing to analysis and
decision making.
Question 4: How has PCE contributed to your conclusions?
Question 5: How has AESA contributed to your conclusions?
Note to facilitators:
1. Prepare and conduct the visual (drawings) session together with
the matrix, so that the analysis can be more visual and less
quantitative. Fewer letters and numbers but more drawings are
the key for good understanding for the benefit of farmers.
2. Define which parameters of comparison will be used in the
picture: whether it is number or size. Try not to mix parameters,
which may confuse farmers.
3
3. Prepare matrix paper, cards or materials before a session.
4. For this session you must review all materials developed by the
farmers with regard to the target enterprise (PCE and AESA).
Apart from existing data, you can add other criteria or
observation such as health of trees or water contamination etc., if STEP 11
appropriate.
5. Be present throughout the session since at the end of the session
farmers must be convinced which application of the criteria and
principles of FFS will help them to manage their crop better.
6. Prepare PCE Analysis report (Annex 3 9 2).
3 Cost Benefit Analysis Session
STEP 11 Objectives.
To help members to be aware of the cost implication of enterprises
and to understand the importance of analysing expenditure and
profit through simplified calculation exercises (reporting format is
available in Annex 3 9 3).
Considerations.
Analysis should be made enterprise by enterprise. You can prepare
the matrices on newsprint in advance of the session.
Procedure A. Summarising Yield and Profit.

Calculate input and output of the enterprise in a simplified way,
using figures from the PCE.
Step 1: Calculation of total expenditure.

Try to calculate how much you spend on each plot.
Plot 1 Plot 2 Plot 3
Seeds Ksh. Ksh. Ksh.
Manure Ksh. Ksh. Ksh.
Fertiliser Ksh. Ksh. Ksh.
Other farm input Ksh. Ksh. Ksh.
Labour Cost* Ksh. Ksh. Ksh.
Total Ksh. Ksh. Ksh.
*Note: Calculation of the labour cost is important but also complicated. If the
difference in labour requirement between the plots is very small then it is
better to neglect calculation of labour costs. If there is a significant difference
in labour requirements then first estimate the number of labour days for each
plot and then multiply by the local daily wage cost – even if the labour is
provided by the farmer or his family without cost. This allows a value to be
assigned to any extra labour inputs.
3
Step 2: Calculation of the yield
Measure how much yield you have got from each plot.
Yield Bags Bags Bags STEP 11
Step 3: Calculation of Gross benefit

Calculate the total value of the products.
Yield: from Step 2 Bags Bags Bags

Price per Bag* Ksh. Ksh. Ksh.
Total Value: Gross profit
(No. of Bags X Price/Bag) Ksh. Ksh. Ksh.
*Use the market price even if farmers do not sell the product.
Step 4: Calculation of Net profit

Calculate net profit subtracting total expenditure from gross profit.
Total Value: from Step 3

(Bags X Price: Gross profit) Ksh. Ksh. Ksh.
Total Expenditure:
from Step 1 Ksh. Ksh. Ksh.
Profit: Net Profit
(Gross Profit Expenditure) Ksh. Ksh. Ksh.
Concluding Questions:
Question 1: Which treatment needed more input?
Question 2: Which plot had the higher yield?
Question 3: Which plot resulted in the highest profit?
Question 4: Did the plots have any other advantages other than yield and profit?
Mention some:
Question 5: Overall, which treatment option seems more suitable for
your own farms?
3
Procedure B. Quantification of Yield and Profit.
If you think the members are capable and have enough time to
conduct the session, then try to quantify the cost per acre/ha on the
basis of each plot as follows:
STEP 11
Step 1: Calculation of Plot Area.
Calculate the total host farm area excluding protection area, and
divide by the number of the plots. If farm size was 30 m X 20 m and
you divided it in 3, so the area of one plot is 200 m2.
LENGTH X WIDTH = TOTAL PLOT AREA / NUMBER OF PLOT = PLOT AREA
e.g. 30 m X 20 m = 600 m2 / 3 plot = 200 m2
Step 2: Find a coefficient for acreage.

You can calculate a coefficient for acreage by calculating how
many plots are able to fit within an acre.
e.g. 4,000 m2 (1 acre) / 200 m2 (plot size) = 20 times
Step 3: Quantification of input and yield by acreage

If you multiply any figure drawn from your plot calculation such as
input, yield, value or profit by the above coefficient, you can get the
quantified figure on a per acre basis.
FIGURE PER PLOT x COEFFICIENT = FIGURE PER ACRE

e.g. KSH. 1,200 (Input/plot) x 20 = KSH. 24,000 (Input/acre)
KSH. 3,000 (Value/plot) x 20 = KSH. 60,000 (Input/acre)
Yield Bags Bags Bags

Quantified Yield per acre
(Yield x Coefficient) Bags Bags Bags
Total Product Value Ksh. Ksh. Ksh.
Quantified Value per acre
(Value x Coefficient) Ksh. Ksh. Ksh.
Cost/Expenditure Ksh. Ksh. Ksh.
Quantified Cost per acre
(Cost x Coefficient) Ksh. Ksh. Ksh.
Profit Ksh. Ksh. Ksh.
Quantified Profit per acre
(Profit x Coefficient) Ksh. Ksh. Ksh.
Farm Self-Assessment Session

3
Objectives. STEP 11
To help group members to evaluate themselves through the
changes that have occurred in their fields such as the number of
seedlings produced, trees planted and yields. Project management
and facilitators can check their adoption level and
viable/appropriate techniques as well.
1. Seedlings Production.
Question 1: How many & what kind of seedlings were produced by

the GROUP before and after FFS?
Tree Species No. of Seedlings No. of Seedlings

produced produced
Before FFS During FFS
Avocado (Root Stock) 0 250
Avocado (Grafted) 0 30
Eucalyptus 0 50
Question 2: How many & what kind of seedlings were PRODUCED by

EACH MEMBER before and after FFS?
Who Tree Species No. of Seedlings No. of Seedlings

produced produced
Tom Avocado (Root Stock) 0 50
Avocado (Grafted) 0 40
Josephina Caliandra 0 250
Muvesi 0 25
Mukau 0 10
Ali Grevillea 20 120
Eucalyptus 20 120
3
2. Tree Planting on Farm.
Question 3: How many & what kind of trees were planted on YOUR
(EACH MEMBER’S) lands before and after FFS?
STEP 11
Who Tree Species No. of Trees No. of Trees
Planted Planted
Peter Mukau 0 20
Mango (grafted) 0 36
Mariam Caliandra 0 120
Marverry 0 80
Mukau 0 5
Idi Cordia 0 10
Grevillea 20 80
3. Crop Yield.
Question 4: How has CROP YIELD in YOUR (EACH MEMBER’S)

agricultural lands been increased/decreased after FFS?
Who Tree Species Before FFS During FFS

Yield Area Yield Area
(bags) (Acre) (bags) (Acre)
Paul Maize 4 1 5 1
Beans 2 1 3 1
Joseph Maize 6 2 14 2
Pigeon Peas 1 1 2 1
Sorghum 3 1 3 1
James Millet 2 1 4 1
Green Gram 1 1 1.5 1

3
4. Changes in the Farm.
Question 5: What differences can you observe in YOUR (EACH

MEMBER’S) farm lands before and after FFS?
STEP 11
Changes Before FFS During FFS
Maize At random We put line before

Planting (No proper spacing) planting and plant 3
feet X 3 feet
Fertilizer Never used because We apply one
we thought it will teaspoonful to each
destroy the soil seed
Manure Just broadcast Spot application
application when we sow the
seeds
Farm Approx. once per Almost every
observation month 3 days
Protection from Free grazing after Fenced and
livestock harvesting protected whole year
Appearance of Nobody cares Neighbours start
the farm in your asking what I am
community trying
3 Self Evaluation Session
STEP 11 Objectives.
In order to evaluate the level of empowerment and weakness, this
session tries to help participants become aware and conscious of
what they have gained throughout the FFS process and from FFS
(reporting format is available in Annex 3 9 4).
Question 1: What was your most exciting finding/experience in FFS?

Ask each member’s personal impression of what they found most
useful or interesting in FFS. e.g. “mango grafting would improve my
farm”, “I was really surprised how fast trees grow!” etc. and separate
them into several categories on the newsprint.
Most exciting experiences
1.
#
Question 2: What was your most disappointing experience in FFS?

Some people might be too shy to talk openly about their negative
feeling about the FFS. You can ask members to write on cards and
collect them for later discussion.
Most disappointing experiences
1.
#
Question 3: Which kind of change have you observed in YOUR

GROUP before and after FFS?
Changes Before FFS After FFS
1.
#
3
Question 4: Which kind of change can you observe in YOURSELF
before and after FFS?
Changes Before FFS After FFS
1.
STEP 11
#
Question 5: How do you evaluate FFS compared with previous

extension services?
Finally, ask members for an overall impression of Livelihood Farmer

Field School and to evaluate the services through FFS in comparison
to previous extension services (Very Good, Good, Fair, Bad, Very Bad)
and report the result to HQ.
3 Way Forward Session

STEP 11 Objective.
To help a group become aware of the need for planning for self
reliance activities and to promote continuous group activities with
PCE/FFS/IGA after graduation (reporting format is available in
Annex 3 9 5).
Procedure.
The facilitator should facilitate the group to conduct sub group
sessions for the following four key issues and to discuss the way
forward among themselves.
Use the questions below as the guide for facilitation.
1. PCE/AESA
Do you feel it is necessary to continue PCE and AESA? And WHY
do you feel so?
Are there any topics not yet covered or that need to be
reinforced among the enterprises learnt?
Do you have other enterprises that you would like to learn and try?
Can you continue with PCE and AESA in your own farm?
How will you manage to get the inputs for those PCE?
2. Income Generation Activities (IGA)

Will you continue with existing IGAs such as a tree nursery for fund
raising?
Do you feel that is enough?
Do you want to start a new IGA such as poultry or goat keeping?
How will you learn about that?
Will you need some technical assistance or inputs?
How can you get that technical support and who will pay for it?
3. FFS
Do you think it is necessary to continue with FFS sessions for PCE
and IGA as conducted before?
3
Why do you feel so?
How will you organise your group? Same members? Same
by laws? Will you meet weekly as it was before?
How can you get a specialist for a special topic? How often will
you ask them to come? STEP 11
How much will it cost?
Will you pay for it?
How do you finance those activities? By yourself or finding other
sources of funds?
How do you procure the materials and inputs?
4. Other activities.
Do you have other ideas for group activities other than
PCE/AESA/IGA/FFS?
5. Preparation of Action Plan.

After presentations by all sub groups, hold a group discussion to
come up with a plan for the way forward after graduation and future
proposals for action. Commitments by the participants are also
important since the plan should be implemented.
6. Comments & Recommendations.

Finally provide the members with some suggestions and
recommendation in relation to the plan for the way forward.
205
Step 12 Field Day
3
STEP 12
Purpose Provide the FFS members with an opportunity to display

and share the results of their PCE and other experiences.
Motivate neighbouring non member farmers with the result
of new technologies demonstrated in the host farm and
also empower/build self esteem of the group members by
showing their good efforts.
Reinforce cohesion among group members and raise
awareness among other community members, the
government and other organisations in the area in
promoting FFS and receiving support.
Main Outputs 1. Field Day Reports
Time Estimate Three to five weeks
Important Points 1. Timing.

Should be done when the PCE results are available for
demonstration.
Should be done as an FFS activity (one FFS day will be
converted to a field day).
2. Contents.
Facilitators should confirm:
. Group should be confident and willing to show their
result of FFS to the neighbours.
. FFS must believe “There is something we want to show.”
. Facilitators must confirm “There is something to be
shown.”
3. Lack of Clear conscious of field day.

Many members may find it difficult to understand the
importance of field days. Explain clearly the purpose of
3
continued
a field day e.g. exposure to neighbours and improve of
presentation skills of the members.
STEP 12
4. Lack of Clear conscious of Field Day
Many members may find it difficult to understand the
importance of field days. Explain clearly the purpose of
a field day e.g. exposure to neighbours and
improvement of presentation skills of the members.
Sequence of 1st week

Activities 1. Planning (see page 210).
Preparation of a Field Day activity proposal.
Initiate invitation for guests and publicity.
2nd week
2. Procurement.
Purchase of required materials.
3. Site preparation.
Allocation of duties and rehearsals.
3rd week
4. Field day.
Implementation of Field Day.
Typical Field Day Programme is as follows:
. Arrival of visitors & registration
. Host farm visit & demonstration
. Assemble/prayer
. Introduction
. Presentation of learning result
. Folk media/group dynamics
. Speeches
. Vote of thanks
. Prayer
. Refreshment/lunch
. Departure
3
STEP 12
4th week
5. Compilation of the field day report.
Preparation of Field Day Report through sharing
experiences.
Special Topic 1. Prior to the field Day.

What is a Field Day?
2. After the field Day.

Experience sharing.
Lessons Learned 1. Number of community participants.

Invite government officials including the village chief
who can officially to announce the event.
2. Mobilisation of resources
Funds needed to carry out a field day must be disbursed
immediately after the planning is completed.
3. Interests from community participants.

After the field day, there are always people who wish to
join FFS. It is recommended for them to form a group
and wait for the next round of FFS.
New members would not be accepted to join an ongoing
FFS. They should undertake the full cycle of an FFS.
3
continued
STEP 12
4. Poor attendance.
Poor attendance is usually due to improper
announcement and publicity.
Interference from unexpected social events such as
funeral and rains.
5. Preparation.
Preparation of field days is not easy for the members.
Facilitators need to support FFS members as much as possible.
Experience Sharing & Evaluation of Field Day
A wrap up discussion should be held after the Field Day

either the same day or in the following FFS session. This is
a good opportunity for experience sharing on the
findings. Reflect on the Field Day experiences and ask
“What was good and what was bad” for analysis of the
Field Day. Evaluate the Field Day using the Field Day
Report format below.
3
STEP 12
3
Names of Key Persons to be Invited
STEP 12
No Name Institution Responsible
3
STEP 12
213
Step 13 Preparing Project

proposals with
RuralInvest Module 3 3
STEP 13
Purpose Prepare project proposals with RuralInvest Module 3.
Main Outputs 1. Project Proposals

2. Memorandum of understanding between the project and
farmer groups or loan agreements between a bank and
farmer groups
Time Estimate 3 to 8 weeks
Important Points 1. Skip this step if the project does not have RuralInvest
Capacity.
This step should be skipped if the project does not have
RuralInvest capacity or offer support to FFS groups in
preparing investment project proposals.
2. Need to have a RuralInvest Technical Support Unit.

Experience with RuralInvest has shown that the definition
of ‘Blocks’ is often difficult for both farmers and
facilitators. All projects using RuralInvest must have a
RuralInvest Technical Support Unit (TSU) which can
provide guidance and assistance as necessary to
facilitators.
3. Do not rush but provide constant backstopping to FFS groups

in proposal preparation.
The process of project proposal preparation can take a
long time, depending on the amount of information
which needs to be gathered. It might not be completed
before the FFS graduation (Step 14).
Facilitators would need to provide backstopping and
advice to groups preparing proposals with RuralInvest
Module 3.
3
continued
4. Farmers should play the central role in preparing and
reviewing the proposal.
Farmers can and should be involved in investigating and
STEP 13
defining costs, prices, activities and other aspects of the
proposed enterprise. Howevr, the actual calculation of
enterprise feasibility will require the use of a computer,
and would normally occur at the local office of the
parent project (or the home base of the facilitator if not
a project employee). It is then the responsibility of the
facilitator to print out and discuss the results of the
analysis with the applicant group.
5. Investment projects need to be linked with private sector.

This manual recommends that if groups are interested in
income generation enterprises, it would be appropriate to
provide them with loans rather than grants.
It is often useful to develop financing mechanisms with
private sector financing agencies under a Public Private
sector Partnership (PPP).
6. Scale-up of enterprises mean increasing risks of failures.

Investment for enterprise development is different from
the FFS itself, which is conducted under a protected and
minimum risk environment. Therefore, facilitators should
respect the decisions of farmers in the selection of
enterprises for investment – after all, it is farmers’
responsibility. However, facilitators should provide as
much advice and support in enterprise development
investment as possible using the results of FFS.
7. Composition and organization of groups for enterprise

development.
Normally, FFS members will need to form several groups
or clusters for enterprise development, as enterprise
management becomes difficult with many participants.
The composition and organization of a group to carry

out enterprise development has a major impact on the
3
success of an enterprise. Thus, facilitators should not
STEP 13
interfere in the composition/distribution of members.

Activities 1. Review of results of the participatory evaluation and
selection of the Group Project.
Compare results of the participatory evaluation with the
Profile that was prepared in Step 3 (RuralInvest Module 2).
Each group must decide on the type of enterprise to be
developed and discuss the both the project objective
and potential markets.
Look at the RuralInvest Module 3 Data Gathering Formats
(Annex 3 10) and exchange views on what is to be
described in each format.
Remember, the Module 3 formats are used only for
collecting and organizing information; the actual
calculations and analysis will have to be done on a
computer by someone fully trained in Module 3.
2nd week
2. Proposal Preparation with RuralInvest Module 3 Format.
Discuss and fill in the Beneficiary/Group Analysis and
qualitative analysis sections. These may need to be
modified again after all price, cost and other data has
been collected.
3rd week
3. Identification of investment and general costs.
Discuss and identify the items required for the
investment itself and the expected general costs of the
enterprise.
Identify the group members responsible for investigating
the unit cost of each investment item.
3
continued
4th week
4. Completion of Investment and general costs.
Complete the “Investment Costs” and “General Costs”
STEP 13
formats.
Review the total investment costs and determine whether
the group would likely to be able to re pay the total
investment amount if the capital is borrowed from a bank.
Consider whether some purchased materials and items
can be substituted by cheaper locally produced
materials.
Review whether the level of ‘own resources’ that the
group would contribute to the project is too little
compared to the total investment amount. For an income
generating investment, it should be more than 20%.
5th week and onward

5. Preparation of full proposals.
It may also be appropriate that the TSU review the
estimates made by the groups and assist the facilitators to
prepare the final analysis. Until all parties (farmers,
facilitator and, if involved, TSU) agree, the proposal details
may need to be revisited several times.
6. Submission of proposals to the project.

Once approved by the applicants, the facilitator and
the TSU, the proposal should be formally submitted for
final review and approval at central level.
Those proposals not supported by the project (TSU at the
central level) would be returned to the group for further
revision, until all comments from the TSU at the central
level are reflected.
7. Finalizing of Module 3 proposals.

Depending on the types of projects – whether the
parent project itself directly finances the group project
or whether the parent project just facilitates the groups
in accessing loans from banks, the accepted project

proposals would be passed to the next step of preparing
3
financing agreements.
STEP 13
If the parent project finances the individual group projects
using internal funds, a Memorandum of Understanding
(MOU) would be prepared and signed (a sample is
attached below).
Proposals that were approved by the parent project but
still required further modifications from the project
partner bank would need to be revised again
according to the comments from the bank.
The groups that are getting loans from the bank would
fill out a “Loan Application”.
3
STEP 13
3
Attachment 1. List of Group Members
STEP 13
No Name Sex Bank Account No Signature

3
STEP 13
Attachment 2. List of Procurement Items
No Item Unit Cost No Total
Total
3
STEP 13
223
Step 14 Graduation
3
STEP 14
Purpose To mark the end of the successful FFS learning cycle.

To motivate the members to practice the knowledge they
have acquired on their own individual farms.
To celebrate the farmers achievements and acknowledge
time taken by farmers.
Main Outputs 1. Farmer as experts

2. Award of certificates
3. Graduation report
Time Estimate Four weeks
Important Points 1. Graduation budget.

Transport
Lunch
2. T-shirts.
Under the ISFP, the FFS members were encouraged to
organize themselves to purchase T shirts with their
contributions as mementos of FFS and graduation.
3. Logistics.
Logistics is the most complex exercise. If the project
organizes a collective graduation ceremony by inviting
neighbouring FFSs to a designated venue facilitators
may have to organize transport for the group members.
Print the certificates and carefully verify the names of
graduates.
4. Arrangement & Preparation by group.

Prepare:
Presentation materials on learning results (Posters, AESA
3
continued
charts, Result Analysis, etc.);
Folk Media/Dynamics;
Graduation clothing (T shirts, caps) (optional);
STEP 14
Presentation and Folk Media/Dynamics;
The venue (by the host group);
Tents and arrange chairs; and
Refreshment or lunch using the graduation budget
allocated to each group.
5. Sharing of experiences.
The FFS graduation is not just a ceremony but also an
opportunity for experience sharing.
Visitors should be guided by a host member to share the
experiences as much as possible.
6. Promotion of FFS groups.

Use the event for promotion of the FFS groups since
village officials and many stakeholders are also invited
to attend.
Follow up activities may be proposed by other donors,
NGOs or key stakeholders.
7. Participatory evaluation (final sessions) reports.

Prior to the graduation ceremony, the group must
complete a Participatory Evaluation (Final Sessions) so
they can present their achievements during the
graduation.

Activities 1. Evaluation and confirmation of qualification.
Confirm eligibility to graduate from the attendance list.
Members who have failed to attend 70% of all sessions
would not qualify for graduation.
2nd week
2. Planning for graduation.
Confirm fund availability.
Date setting for graduation.

Identify graduation venue.
3
Notify the graduates.
STEP 14
Prepare a graduation programme.
Invite guests.
3rd week
3. Preparation.
Set the venue (by the host group).
Prepare a list of graduates.
4th week
4. Graduation.
See “Proposed Time Table for FFS Graduation”
Complete the graduation report.
3
continued
Organizing the Graduation Ceremony
STEP 14
A graduation marks the end of a successful FFS learning
cycle. Unlike many other extension approaches, FFS has a
very clear end to the programme. This leads to the farmers’
conscious change to become self reliant. Through well
managed FFS sessions, dependency is often no longer an
issue for many graduates.
The graduation ceremony is usually organised by the

farmers, facilitators and the coordinating offices, not by the
field coordinator. It is also a forum to pass on the lessons
learnt during the FFS to the public; similar to the field days.
The harvest obtained from PCE will be displayed, and FFS
participants dramatise (using folk media) all lessons learnt
at the FFS. Participants are awarded a certificate by the
supporting agency/programme. At the same time, other
community members will be attracted and may develop
an interest to join the next planned FFS in their locality.
3
Visiting the Host Farm
STEP 14
Presentation of Learning Results
Presentation of Group Dynamics/Folk Media

3 Proposed Time Table for FFS Graduation

STEP 14
Time Topic
9:00 FFS Groups Assemble
9:15 Registration
10:00 Opening
10:00 Prayers
10:05 Visiting Host Farm
10:15 Presentations of Groups
11:00 Group Dynamics
11:15 Speech
FFS Representative
District representative
Provincial representative
Project team representative
11:45 Guest Speech
Local leaders: Chief, Councillors, District officers,

District commissioner etc
Chief Guest
12:15 Presentation of Certificates
12:30 Vote of Thanks
12:45 Refreshments
13:00 Prayers
13:15 Departure
3
STEP 14
3
Example of Graduation Certificate
STEP 14
3
STEP 14
Final Annexes Prove ARRI impaginato 16/02/12 19.29 Pagina 232
Annex 1. Enterprise Catalogue

233
Livelihood Farmer Field Schools

Enterprise Catalogue
SUSTAINABLE LIVELIHOOD DEVELOPMENT

PROJECT IN THE MAU FOREST COMPLEX
234
About this Enterprise
This catalogue has been prepared for Livelihood Farmer Field Schools
(LFFS) under TCP Sustainable Livelihood Development in the Mau Forest
Complex. Each menu represents a learning enterprise package, which
consists of the benefit, cost estimate, remarks, period for establishment
and management, possible layout with illustrations and some pictorial
images. Most of the learning options are designed in combination with
income generating or livelihood support activities to attract farmers’
interest in participation.
The group members are expected to select their LFFS learning enterprise
from this Activity Catalogue and develop a learning plan after
conducting the “Learning Expectation Session”. Please read the
enterprises carefully and discuss among the members which option
might be the most appropriate in your area and worth trying through
LFFS. This catalogue may help the members to learn some possible
solutions for livelihood improvement and environment conservation
which they can practice on their own farms in parallel to the learning
process.
11th March, 2010
James M. Kimondo
& Shinji Ogawa
235
Contents
About This Activity Catalogue 2

How to select the Learning Options 3
1. Wood Lots for Timber 4
2. Wood Lots for Poles & Firewood 5
3. Fruit Orchards 6
4. Fodder Bank for Livestock 7
5. Bamboo Planting 8
6. Tree Nurseries 9
7. Home Garden 10
8. Beekeeping 11
9. Fish Farming 12
10. Poultry Keeping 13
11. Dairy Animal Management
(only in case the group can provide animals) 14
236
237
How to select Learning

Enterprises
Step 1
Select Forestry Select Tree

Related Enterprise Nurseries
From the options
1
2 3 6
Since you need

seedlings
4 5
Step 2
Select Livelihood
Improvement
Enterprise
From the options 7
8 9 Identify Your
Learning Enterprise
for LFFS
10 11
238
1. Wood Lots for Timber
Grevillea wood lot
Cost Estimate (an example)

Requirement Quantity Unit Price (Ksh.) Total
Seedlings of Species1 9 + (1)* 10/seedling 100
Seedlings of Species 2 9 + (1)* 10/seedling 100
Option 1 (Fertiliser Testing)
Seed of Food Crop (Common) 1.2 kg 50 60
Fertilizer 5 kg 50 250
Manure 15 debes Local collection
Option 2 (Variety Testing)
Seed of Food Crop (Improved) 0.6 kg 250 150
Total with Option 1 510
Total with Option 2 380
*for replacement
239
Benefit
• Provision of timber after 12 20 years for domestic use and income
generation.
• Soil is continuously covered and protected against erosion.
• Farmers could produce food crops for one to two years until trees
cover the land.
• Provision of firewood from pruning and thinning from woodlot.
• Provision of fodder by some species like Grevillea.
Remarks
• Seedlings can be produced in nurseries, if the nursery enterprise
has been selected by the group.
• No more intercropping two to three years after the establishment
of wood lot.
• After tree establishment there is no income up to the time the
trees are harvested.
Possible PTD Design

Species Testing with Crop Experiment
Establishment & Management Period

Activities Duration
Planning & Designing 1 day
Land marking & preparation 1 2 days
Planting 1 days
Monitoring Every 4 weeks
Tinning After 5 6 Years
Harvesting After 12 20 Years
240
2. Wood Lots for Poles &

Firewood
Eucalyptus tree planting

Seedlings of Eucalyptus 9 + 36 + (5)* 10/ seedling 500
Total 650
*for replacement
241
Benefit
• Provision of construction poles and firewood for household use or
sale to the existing market.
• Generation of income within a short period (3 to 5 years) if the
products are sold to the market.
• Farmers could produce food crops for the first year if trees are
planted in wider spacing.
• Stumps will protect the land continuously if coppicing species like
Eucalyptus are planted.
Remarks
• Seedlings can be produced in the nurseries, if the nursery
enterprise has been selected by the group.
• After one year, the tree crowns will interfere with crop production
– no more crops planting.
Possible PTD Design

Species Testing with Crop Experiment

Activities Duration
Land marking & preparation 1 2 days
Planting 1 days
242
3. Fruits Orchard

Fruit Seedlings (Variety 1) 3 + (1)* 150 600
Manure 4.5 bags Local Collection
Option 1 (Fertiliser Testing)
Fertilizer 15 kg 50 750
Manure 455 debes Local collection
Option 2 (Variety Testing)
Total with Option 1 2,730
Total with Option 2 2,340
*for replacement
243
Benefit
• Provision of fruits within a short period (2 3 years) if the fruit trees
are grafted.
• Distribution of income throughout the year if there are several
varieties planted.
• Provides nutrients and vitamins to the household from the fruits.
• Combined crops provide food at same time.
• Provision of scions for grafting to expand orchard.
Remarks
• Fencing of Fruits Orchard is necessary for protection against
animals.
• They require intensive care for pests and diseases and require
fungicides and pesticides especially during flowering and fruiting.
• Spacing of trees varies depending on the species (Consult a
Specialist).
. Possible PTD Design

Variety Testing Species Testing

Activities Duration
Land marking & preparation 1 days
Planting 1 days
244
4. Fodder Bank for Livestock
Mulberry trees planted along boundary of a farm
Provision of fodder Silk worm production

Fodder Tree Seedlings (Species 1) 30 10 / seedling 300
Fodder Tree Cuttings (Species 2) 30 10 / seedling 300
Fence 36 m Local material
Total 600
245
Benefit
• Provision of fodder for livestock in dry season after 2 to 3 years.
• Protection of slopes, river banks or farm boundaries with fodder
tree species.
• In case mulberry trees were planted, provision of feed for silk
worm for silk production in future (Comprehensive training
necessary).
Remarks
• Fodder tree seedlings such as Mulberry, Calliandra, Sesbania,
Leucaena can be produced in the nurseries.
• Mulberry seedling can be produced vegetatively from cuttings.
• Trees planted must be fenced permanently but more especially in
early stage of establishment.
• In case of Sesbania, trees have to be replanted after 3 4 years.
Possible PTD Design

Species Testing

Activities Duration
Land marking & preparation 1 days
Planting 1 days
246
5. Bamboo Planting
Bamboo planting after three years
Bamboo Seedlings Bamboo baskets

Native Bamboo Seedlings 8 100 800
Exotic Bamboo Seedlings 8 100 800
Manure 2 bags Local Collection
Total 1,650
247
Benefit
• Production of bamboo materials for both domestic and industrial
use after 4 to 8 years.
• Soil and land conservation in steep areas.
• Production of fodder in dry period when the bamboos are well
established.
• Employing appropriate harvesting method, replanting will not be
necessary for a very long period.
Remarks
• Seedling can be produced in the nursery, if the nursery enterprise
has been selected by the group.
• Fencing of the bamboo planted area is crucial since they are very
palatable to animals.
Possible PTD Design

Species Testing

Activities Duration
Land marking & preparation 1 day
Planting 1 day
248
6. Tree Nurseries

Seeds of various tree species 1,500
Polythene tubes (small) 2,000 0.4 800
Polythene tubes (big) 500 0.6 300
Nursery Soil 32 bags Local Collection
Forest Soil 12 bags Local Collection
Compost Manure 8 bags Local Collection
Sand 12 bags Local Collection
Jembe * 2 180 360
Spade * 2 250 500
Panga * 2 150 300
Soil sieve 2m 200/m 400
Watering Can 2 300 600
Funggicide 200g 350 350
Insecticide 200ml Herbal Medicine
Secateurs 2 500 1,000
Knife 5 Local material
Scion 350 5 1,750
Total 7,860
* Use existing farm implements as much as possible to reduce the cost.

249
Benefit
Whichever forestry related enterprise you take, tree seedlings will need
to be produced. Although a small scale nursery requires daily care
and constant supply of water, it is easy to start and manage, and has
the following advantages:
• Members can raise the required species.
• It may supply seedlings at low cost and close to the planting sites
• It may act as an income generating activity if the seedlings
are sold.
The table on the left, which estimates nursery materials may help
members to calculate the total amount of required fund for
establishment.
Possible Layout
250
7. Home Garden
Home garden with several types of vegetables
Cabbage Snow Pea

Seeds of Vegetable 1 50 g 500/250g 100
Seeds of Vegetable 2 50 g 750/250g 150
Seeds of Vegetable 3 1 Kg 50/Kg 50
Seeds of Vegetable 4 2 Kg 50/Kg 100
Manure 4 bags Local Collection
Fungicide 200g 350 350
Insecticide 200ml Herbal Medicine
Total 750
251
Benefit
• It can be started on a very small piece of land.
• It provides food (vegetables, tubers, fruits, herbs, spices, etc.) and
improves nutrition.
• Generation of income within a short period (3 to 8 months) if
harvest is sold to the market.
Remarks
• They require intensive care to control pests and diseases
sometimes through use of fungicides and pesticides.
• Fencing of all of the planted area is necessary.
• It is also good to conduct a market price survey.
Possible PTD Design

Activities Duration
Land marking & preparation 1 day
Planting 1 day
Monitoring Every week
Harvesting After 3 8 months
252
8. Beekeeping
A FFS apiary with several types of hives

Langstroth Beehive 1 4,000 4,000
Kenya Top Bar Hive or Box Hive 1 2,500 2,500
Local Beehive 2 500 1,000
Wire mesh (Queen Excluder) 1m 200 200
Hanging Wire 10 m 20 200
Treated Posts 3 200 600
Suits 1 4,000 4,000
Smoker 1 1,000 1,000
Beehive Tool 1 350 350
Gum Boots 3 900 2,700
Torch 1 200 200
Total 16,750
253
Benefit
• Provides honey for consumption and sale.
• Requires little labour input after installation.
• Gives quick returns on investment.
• Improves cross pollination of surrounding plants and crops thus
increasing production.
Remarks
• Initial cost of establishment and accessories is high.
• Requires enough experience in proper management of bees,
apiary and honey harvesting and processing.
Possible PTD Design
Improved log hive with

queen excluder
Langstroth & Box type Bee hives Snow Pea

Activities Duration
Land preparation 1 days
Hive setting 1 days
254
9. Fish Farming
Small fish pond prepared for fish farming

Fingerlings of Tilapia 80 3 240
Fingerlings of Catfish 8 5 40
Feeds (Initial) 50 Kg 30 1,500
Fish Net 4 200 800
Total 2,580
If you employ manual labour for digging the fish pond, it will cost around
12 man/day (12 MD x 300 = Ksh. 3,600)
255
Benefit
• Provision of food and source of protein.
• Generation of income within a short period (8 to 12 months) if the
product is sold in the market.
• Requires little labour input after installation.
• Fish can feed on larvae of harmful insects like mosquitoes.
Remarks
• In case of porous soil, use of plastic sheet at the bottom and sides
of the ponds is recommended.
• Fingerlings have to be carefully sourced.
• It is recommended that fingerlings from other sources be added
after 2 years to revitalise productivity.
Possible PTD Design

• Compare size of different fish species if their fingerlings are
available.
• Compare different feeding practices (Traditional and
Concentrated).

Activities Duration
Land marking & preparation of ponds 3 days
Releasing 1 day
256
10. Poultry Keeping
semi-caged Free

Day old chick (Grade) 20 70 1,400
Chick (Local) 20 30 600
Housing Material 500
Wire mesh 8m 200 1,600
Feeders 2 200 400
Drinker 2 200 400
Drugs & Vaccines 1,200
Feed (Initial) 70 kg 50 3,500
Total 9,600
257
Benefit
• Provides meat/eggs for consumption and sale.
• Requires little labour input.
• Gives quick returns on investment.
• Poultry manure provides good fertilizer and animal feed.
Remarks
• Diseases eg NCD, Typhoid & coccidiosis have to be taken care of.
• Requires daily monitoring for feeding, watering and collection of
eggs, thus a full time assignment of members.
Possible PTD Design

• Compare the period until initial egg production between Local
and Grade chicken.
• Compare the production of eggs between free, semi caged and
fully caged chicken.
• Compare the two different types of feeds on both Local and
Grade chicken.
• Compare the frequency of egg production and price of eggs
from Local and Grade chicken.

Activities Duration
Preparation 2 days
Production After 6 8 months
258

(only in case the group provides animals)

Cuttings of Napier Grass 216 5 1,080
Seeds of Rhodes Grass 2 kg 600 1,200
Fertilizers 6 kg 50 300
Housing Material Host farmer’s Cost
Drugs, Mineral licks,
Vaccines, Acaricides Host farmer’s Cost
Total 2,580
259
Benefit
• Better milk production in quantity and quality.
• Zero grazing allows use of limited space.
• Good source of manure for crops and fodder production.
• Animal is confined hence no need to roam around.
Remarks
• Use member’s existing livestock as host animals.
• Use existing livestock keeping structure or construct small
paddocks or zero grazing unit if required.
• Fodder bank should be established nearby (with Napier Grass
or/and Rhodes grass).
• Simple silage practice can be introduced to ensure availability of
animal feed during dry period.
• Need to have adequate water nearby and hygiene is of outmost
importance.
• Highly labour intensive.
Possible PTD Design

• Compare the milk production before and after start of feeding
animals with cut and carry fodder grass.
• Compare health of animals before and after feeding animals with
cut and carry fodder grass.
• Compare the workload or labour needed before and after start
feeding with cut and carry fodder grass.

Activities Duration
Preparation 1 day
Planting 1 day
Annex 2. Study Guide

261
Livelihood Farmer Field Schools

Enterprise Study Guide
SUSTAINABLE LIVELIHOOD DEVELOPMENT

PROJECT IN THE MAU FOREST COMPLEX
262
About this study guide
This Study Guide has been prepared for Livelihood Farmer Field Schools
(LFFS) under TCP Sustainable Livelihood Development in the Mau Forest
Complex. Each activity or enterprise represents a learning package,
which consists of the objectives, materials, possible layout, procedure
and questions to discuss.
Most of the learning options are designed in combination with income

generating or livelihood supporting activities to attract farmers’ interest in
participation.
The group members are expected to select their LFFS learning enterprise
from the Enterprise Catalogue and develop learning plan after
conducting “Learning Expectation Session”. Please, read the menu of
enterprises carefully and discuss among the members which option
might be most appropriate enterprises in your area and worth trying
through LFFS. The catalogue is supposed to help members to discover
some possible solutions for livelihood improvement and environment
conservation.
The emphasis of this guideline is on self guiding as it is written in simple

straight forward language for both technical staff as well as the farmer
facilitators. The implementation of this guideline will improve the
performance of different groups and provides a diversity of options for
the farmer field schools not only in the project area but in other areas
as well.
11th March, 2010
James M. Kimondo
& Shinji Ogawa
263
Contents
About This Study Guide i

Contents ii
1. Wood Lots for Timber 1
2. Wood Lots for Poles and Firewood 3
3. Fruit Orchards 5
4. Fodder Bank for Livestock 7
5. Bamboo Planting 9
6. Tree Nurseries 11
a. Seed pre treatment using water 11
b. Species germination performance 12
c. Difference between direct and indirect seed sowing 13
d. Potting media effect on seedling growth 14
e. Species performance 15
f. Shade effect 16
g. Types of seedling beds 17
h. Different techniques of grafting 17
i. Post grafting management of seedlings 18
j. Effect of age of root stock on rate of grafting success 19
k. Effect of position of a seedling in a seedling bed 20
l. Effect of fertilizer and manure on seedling growth 21
m. Watering frequency 22
n. Effect of root pruning on seedlings growth 23
7. Home Garden 24
8. Beekeeping 26
9. Fish Farming 30
10. Poultry Keeping 32
11. Dairy Animal Management 34
264
265
1. Wood Lots for Timber

Objectives
In this trial you will compare the performance of two timber species
planted with agricultural crops at a moderate spacing and crop yields
during the first one or two years.
Material
Implements for land preparation and cultivation, supply of
maize/sorghum/millet seeds, seedlings of species 1and species 2 as chosen
by the group, sticks, tape measure, ruler, string, note books and pencil.
Layout
Implements for land preparation and cultivation, supply of
maize/sorghum/millet seeds, seedlings of species 1and species 2 as chosen
by the group, sticks, tape measure, ruler, string, note books and pencil.
Procedures
1. Select a piece of land measuring 24m by 12m with relatively uniform

soil characteristics on a flat or gently sloping area. This land should be
provided by one member of the group – the “host farmer”.
2. Prepare the land by clearing of bushes and shrubs before the rain
season starts. The land should also be ripped using an oxen plough
to increase infiltration of rainwater.
266
3. Divide the plot into two equal plots of 12m by 12m for the two (2) tree
species before the rains start as shown in the layout above.
4. At the same time, divide the plot perpendicular to the first division into
two equal plots of 24m by 6m for agriculture crop testing: you can
compare a new variety of maize against local variety; one crop variety
with manure and without; or one crop variety with fertilizer and without.
5. Stake out the two plots at a spacing of 4m by 4m before the rains start.
6. Dig tree planting holes measuring at least 30cm by 30cm wide and
30cm deep.
7. Before the onset of the rains, identify a source of seedlings of the
selected species, purchase and deliver them near the planting site.
8. Construct fences surrounding the plot. This is done to ensure that the
whole plot is protected from animals even after harvesting of crops.
9. After the onset of the rains, plant the tree seedlings of the two
selected species as early as possible so that they can take
advantage of the rains for a long period.
10. Plant the agricultural crop for the trial selected. Use the
recommended by agriculture extension officers in your area for
spacing between rows, and seeds in a row.
11. Weed the plot according to normal farming practice. Oxen ploughs
should be used to plough the land between crops to improve water
infiltration and its subsequent conservation.
10. At regular intervals during the season, monitor crop and tree growth
i.e. tree survival, tree damage, tree height, crop length, number of
live and dead leaves and record the observations of at least three
(3) maize plants in each of the four plots of 12m by 6m. Observe pests
and diseases both in trees and crops.
13. When the crops are ready, the group should meet and agree on the
day to harvest.
14. From each of the four plots of 12m by 6m harvest carefully each plot
separately and measure the yields from each plot and compare
the yields.
15. Compare the survival and height of the two tree species selected.
Questions to discuss
• Was there a crop yield difference between the different plots?

• Was there any difference in tree height growth and survival
between the two selected species in year one and year two?
• Were there any advantages and/or disadvantages of
intercropping each tree species with food crops?
• What were some of the problems encountered in the
establishment and management of the woodlot?
267
2. Wood Lots for Poles and

Firewood
Objectives
In this trial, you will compare the performance of a wood fuel species
planted at two different spacings. Agricultural crops like beans can be
planted in both plots at different spacing to compare the yields during
the first year.
Material
Implements for land preparation and cultivation, supply of beans,
seedlings of wood fuel species as chosen by the group, sticks, string, tape
measure, ruler, pencil and note books
Layout
Procedures
1. Select a piece of land measuring 12m by 6m with relatively uniform

soil characteristics on a flat or gently sloping area. This land should be
provided by one member of the group – the “host farmer”.
2. Prepare the land by clearing the bushes and shrubs before the rainy
season starts. The land should also be ripped using an oxen plough
to increase infiltration of rainwater.
268
3. Divide the plot into two equal plots of 6m by 6m for two (2) tree
species before the rains start as shown in the layout above.
4. At the same time, divide the plot into two equal plots of 6m by 6m for
agriculture crop testing, you may compare: a new variety of maize
against local variety; one crop variety with manure against without;
or one crop variety with fertilizer against without.
5. Stake out one plot at a spacing of 2m by 2m and the other at 1m by
1m before the rains start.
6. Dig tree planting holes measuring at least 30cm by 30cm wide and
30cm deep.
7. Before the onset of the rains, identify where seedlings of the selected
species are available, purchase and deliver them near the planting site.
8. Construct fences surrounding the plot. This will be done to ensure that
the whole plot is protected from animals for a long period after
harvesting of crops.
9. After the onset of the rains, plant the tree seedlings of the two
selected species as early as possible so that they can take
advantage of the rains for a long period.
11. At regular intervals during the growing season, monitor crop and tree
growth i.e. tree survival, tree damage, tree height, crop height,
number of live and dead leaves and record the observations of at
least three (3) maize plants in each plot of 24m by 6m. Observe pest
and disease both in trees and crops.
day to harvest.
13. From each of the two plots of 6m by 6m, harvest carefully each plot
separately, measure the yields from each of the plot and compare
the yields.
14. Compare the survival and height of the two tree species selected.
• Was there a crop yield difference between the two plots?

• Was there any difference in tree height and survival between
species 1 and species 2 after one and two years?
• What were some the problems encountered in the establishment
and management of the woodlot?
• Were there any advantages and/or disadvantages of
intercropping each tree species with food crop?
269
3. Fruit Orchards
Objectives
In this trial you shall test the performance of different varieties of fruits e.g.
avocadoes or citrus in terms of size and quality of fruits, the flowering and
fruiting time, and pest and drought resistance.
Material
Implements to prepare the land and undertake cultivation, seedlings of
different grafted avocado varieties, maize/sorghum/millet and bean/green
gram seeds, notebooks, pencils and measuring tapes to be obtained.
Layout
Procedures
1. Select a relatively flat field of 22 by 22 metres.

2. 2. Before the start of the rains, clear the land of bushes and shrubs.
This should also be ripped using an oxen plough to increase
infiltration of rainwater.
3. Mark the planting points at a spacing of 7m by 7m in 21m by 21m

plot so that the plot has 9 fruit trees. Dig holes of 90cm by 90cm by
90 cm for the planting of the fruit tree seedlings. This is only
applicable for avocadoes; for the other fruit tree seedlings, use 60cm
by 60cm by 60cm as shown in the layout above.
270
4. At the same time, divide the plot into two equal plots of 21m by
10.5m for agriculture crop testing. You may compare: a new variety
of maize against local variety; one crop variety with manure against
without, or one crop variety with fertilizer against without.
5. In each fruit seedling planting hole, put a third of a 90kg bag of
animal manure. Mix it with the topsoil to fill the hole.
6. Select three appropriate fruit varieties (Avocado: Hass, Fuerte, Gwen,
Bacon, Pinkerton, Reed, Lamb Hass and Zutano among others.)
7. Before the onset of the rains, identify where the selected varieties of
Avocado fruit seedlings are available, purchase and deliver them
near the planting site.
8. Plant the agriculture crops between the rows of fruit trees using the
spacing recommended by agriculturists for the area.
9. Plant pigeon peas in the outer strip of 2.5m width surrounding the
plot. This will be done to ensure that the whole plot is protected from
animals for a long period.
10. Immediately after the onset of rains, plant the three different varieties
of Avocado fruit tree seedlings each in its own row of three trees.
11. Weed the plot according to normal farming practice. Oxen plough
12. During the growing season, monitor the crop growth rate, count the
number of leaves, number of cobs, and record other observations of
three (3) maize plants in each plot of 21m by 10.5m. Also monitor
pests and diseases.
13. At regular intervals, monitor the fruit seedling survival, height and
count the number of branches and branchlets of the fruit trees, any
pest and disease problems and monitor the time of flowering for
each fruit tree species.
day to harvest.
15. From each of the two (2) plots of 21m by 10.5m carefully harvest each
plot separately and measure the yields from each of the sub plots.
• At what time did the different fruit varieties start flowering and fruiting?
• Is there any difference in crop yield in the first and second year?
What is the probable cause?
• Which variety among the three fruit varieties performed best?
• What are the advantages and disadvantages of having different
varieties of fruit trees?
271
4. Fodder Bank for Livestock

Objectives
In this trial you shall discover the benefits of growing fodder trees on the
farm for feeding livestock. Fodder is green vegetation from trees that is
harvested and fed to animals without allowing the animals to feed
directly on them. Manual harvesting of fodder helps to ensure the
availability of animal feed during the dry season.
Material
Implements for land preparation and weeding, supply of
seedlings/cuttings of the two selected species and beans/green gram,
sticks, notebooks, pencil, ruler and tape measure.
Layout
Procedures
1. Select a field with relatively uniform soil characteristic on a flat or

gently sloping land.
2. The land should be at least 6m by 12m so that two species may be
tried on plots of 3m by 12m each.
3. Before the rainy season, clear the bushes and shrubs. The plot should
also be ripped using an oxen plough to increase infiltration of
rainwater.
272
4. Stake the plots for the planting spots at a spacing of 1.50m by 0.75m.
Dig holes of 30cm by 30cm by 30 cm for the planting of the fodder
tree species seedlings as shown in the layout above.
5. Before the onset of the rains, identify where seedlings of the selected
two species are available, purchase and deliver them near the
planting site.
6. Plant beans/green gram between the rows of trees in the two plots
uniformly using the spacing recommended by agriculturists for
the area.
7. Construct fences surrounding the plot. This will be done to ensure that
the whole plot is protected from animals for a long period after
harvesting of crops.
8. After the onset of the rains, plant the fodder tree seedlings as early as
possible so that they can take advantage of the rains for a long period.
9. Weed the plots according to normal farming practice. Oxen ploughs
10. At regular intervals during the year, monitor the following in all the plots:
height growth of the planted trees, survival of the trees and the number
of branches. Monitor pests and diseases on both trees and crops.
11. Harvest the crops from each plot separately and record the yields.
12. When the fodder is ready for harvesting, measure the weight of the
fodder harvested in each plot every time in kilograms. Feed the
same amount to a specific number of animals and compare the
result with the common animal feeds.
13. Do a cost benefit analysis to evaluate the advantages and
disadvantages of growing the two different fodder tree species
together with agricultural crops.
• Is there any difference in yield i.e. weight of material cut from the
two fodder tree species; what do you think was the reason?
• What are the advantages and/or disadvantages of cutting and
carrying the feed to the animals?
• Was there a noticeable change in health and milk production
among the animals fed on the fodder?
• Was there any fodder species preference among the livestock?
• Were there any problems encountered while introducing the
animals to the fodder?
273
5. Bamboo Planting
Objectives
In this trial you shall discover the benefits of growing fodder trees on the
farm for feeding livestock. Fodder is green vegetation from trees that is
harvested and fed to animals without allowing the animals to feed
directly on them. Manual harvesting of fodder helps to ensure the
availability of animal feed during the dry season.
Material
Implements for land preparation and weeding, supply of
seedlings/cuttings of the two selected species and beans/green gram,
sticks, notebooks, pencil, ruler and tape measure.
Layout
Procedures
1. Select a relatively flat field of 16 by 16 metres.

2. Before the start of the rains, clear the land of bushes and shrubs. This
should also be ripped using an oxen plough to increase infiltration
of rainwater.
3. Mark the planting points at a spacing of 4m by 4m in the 16m by 16m

plot so that the plot can take 16 bamboos. Dig holes of 30cm by
30cm by 30 cm for the planting of the bamboo tree seedlings.
274
4. At the same time, divide the plot into two equal plots of 16m by 8m
for agriculture crop testing: you may compare one crop variety
(maize) with fertilizer against without.
5. Select two bamboo varieties (Indigenous/Local and Exotic).
6. Before the onset of the rains, identify where the selected varieties of
bamboo seedlings are available, purchase and deliver them near
the planting site.
7. Plant the agriculture crops between the rows of bamboo using the
recommended spacing by agriculturists for the area.
8. Construct a fence surrounding the plot. This will be done to ensure
that the whole plot is protected from animals for a long period.
9. Immediately after the onset of rains, plant the two varieties of
bamboo seedlings each in a 16m by 8m plot as shown in diagram
above.
11. During the growing season, monitor the crop growth rate, count the
number of leaves, number of cobs, and record other observations of
three (3) maize plants in each plot of 8m by 8m. Also monitor pests
and diseases.
12. At regular intervals, monitor the bamboo seedling survival, height
and count the number of new shoots and any pest and disease
problems for each bamboo variety.
day to harvest.
14. From each of the four (4) plots of 8m by 8m carefully harvest each
plot separately and measure the yields from each of the sub plots.
15. Crops can be planted in the second year in the same manner.
• How was the yield difference between the crops planted with
fertilizer/manure and without?
• Is there any difference in crop yield between the first and second
year? What is the probable cause?
• Which variety of bamboo performed better in terms of survival
and growth?
275
6. Tree Nurseries
a. Seed pre-treatment using water
The process of germination starts once the seeds have obtained an
adequate amount of water thus initiating the development of the young
embryo. The intake of this water varies with species depending on the
prevailing condition. In this trial, you are to learn through comparison
whether pre treating seeds with hot water or soaking them in cold water
overnight will improve their germination.
Treatments
• Soak seeds in cold water overnight
• Pre treat seeds with hot water
• Control (do not soak)
Duration
1 Month.
Procedures
1. Select a tree species for trial and obtain some seed of the same.
Divide randomly some 300 seeds into three equal portions of 100
seeds each. Subject one portion to hot water pre treatment; soak
one portion in cold water overnight while you leave the other portion
untreated. Sow the three portions under similar conditions. Check
daily and water the seedbed when it is dry.
2. When germination starts, count germinated seedlings from each

treatment on a daily basis and prick out.
AESA parameters
Number of germinated seedlings and time taken.
276
Summary table
Total no. of Germination Remarks

Germination (no. of seedlings by day)
seedlings %
Treatment 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13............
............24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
Hot water
Cold water
Control
• How many seedlings germinated in each seedbed?
• How many days did it take for the seed to start germinating in
each treatment?
• How long did it take for germination to end in each treatment?
• Apart from the time of germination, is/are there any other
difference(s) in the characteristics of seedlings?
• What were the advantages and disadvantages of the two
different pre treatments in terms of germination and health of the
seedlings?
b. Species germination performance

After sowing of seeds of different species, some will germinate
immediately while others will take some time. While delay in germination
is not a negative effect, it is necessary for you to know for planning
purposes which species germinate fast and those that are slow. This shall
therefore guide in the future planning of nursery activities so that
seedlings are retained in the nursery for as little time as is necessary to
produce a healthy and sturdy stock.
Treatments
The various commonly sown species in the locality shall be divided in two
general groups. These are the slow growing and the fast growing species.
They shall be sown under similar conditions in specific parts of a seedbed.
Duration
1 Month
Procedure
A seedbed shall be prepared and divided into four sections. In each
section 100 seeds of a single species shall be sown. The whole bed shall
have the same soil media, watering regime and cover for shade if applied.
The germinated seedling shall be counted and pricked out into the pots.
277
Slow growing species shall be germinated between May and June while
the fast ones shall be sown between December and January.
AESA parameters
Number of germinated seedlings.
Summary table
Number of seedlings Germinated Total no. of Germination Remarks

by day seedlings %
Species 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13............
............24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
c. Difference between direct and indirect seed sowing

Seeds can be sown either directly into poly bags where they are
maintained until they are ready to plant out in the field or they can be
sown in seedbeds and later pricked out into bags. Normally the
procedure used depends on the size of the seed; for very small sized
seeds, it is advised that the same are sown in seed beds while the big
sized ones can be sown using either method. The objective of this trial is
to determine the most appropriate sowing method for large sized seed.
Treatments
Direct and indirect sowing of seed.
Duration
2 months
Procedure
Take 200 big size seeds of the same species and divide them into two sets
of 100 seeds each. Sow 100 into individual pots and sow the remaining
100 into a seedbed. Subject the seeds to similar watering and shade if
any is provided. Give time for germination to take place as observations
are made regularly.
AESA parameters
• Numbers of germinated seed
• The period taken to germinate and
• Number of seedlings established.
278
d. Difference between direct and indirect seed sowing

In this trial you will learn through comparison the best soil mixture to use in
raising seedlings. Some soils have adequate plant nutrients while others
are deficient in a number of plant nutrients. As a result some soils shall
greatly improve with addition of either manure or fertilizers but others will
register minimal growth improvement. You will therefore compare the
growth performance of seedlings in the usual soil on the farm with
seedlings of the same species grown in the same soil mixed with: manure,
sand, fertilizer or a combination of the same.
Treatments
These are application of a mixture of:
• Soil, manure, sand and fertilizer
• Soil, manure and sand
• Soil and manure
• Soil only
Procedure
Assemble the materials at the nursery i.e. soil, sand, manure and fertilizer.
Mix them into proper proportions. From each mixture, pot 100 containers
of equal size. Transplant one hundred seedlings of the same species
and size into each of the four different batches of containers. The
pricking out should be done on the same day. All the seedlings should
be given the same treatment thereafter as part of the management.
279
Arrange each treatment in one block for easy identification. Monitor the
growth performance of the seedlings in each treatment every week and
record the observation. Measure the height of five (5) randomly selected
seedlings in each treatment once a week.
Duration
2 to 3 months
AESA parameters
Height of seedlings and the girth
• Which kind of problems have you observed in each treatment?
• Are there any advantages and/or disadvantages of using sand,
fertilizer or manure in the potting soil?
e. Species performance
Different tree species grow at different rates under similar conditions.
However, while many species are suitable for timber production, their
growth rates are quite different. As a result some provide the products at
an early age than the others.
The objective of this trial is to determine the growth rates of timber

producing species at the nursery stage.
Treatments
The species are Cypress, Pine, Eucalyptus and Grevillea.
Procedure
Assemble 50 young seedlings of relatively uniform size and age of each
of the four species: Cypress, Pine, Eucalyptus and Grevillea. Subject them
to similar growing conditions but specifically ensuring no water logging
conditions prevail at any time. Sample 5 seedlings randomly of each
species during AESA taking every two weeks.
Duration
3 months
AESA parameters
Height of seedlings and the girth
f. Shade effect
In this trial you shall test the effect of shade on the growth development
of different species to determine those species that may require shade
280
and those that can be raised in the open. You shall compare the growth
development of seedlings of each species both under shade and in the
open sun. The seedlings shall be tested both during the wet season and
the dry season. The other nursery treatments for the seedlings such as
watering, soil mixture or weeding shall be maintained the same so that
the only difference is the application of shade.
Seedlings in the open Seedlings under shade
Procedure
Stage 1: shading after pricking out for 2 months

Place ten seedlings of a specific species under shade and ten in an open
area. Observe for one week and conclude the result.
Stage 2: shading during the dry season

Place ten seedlings of the same species as in stage 1 above under shade
and ten in an open area. Water adequately to keep both treatments
under the same moisture condition since the trial is to compare seedlings
in the sun and those under shade and not watering frequency (obviously
in open area, the seedlings may require more frequent watering).
AESA parameters
Stage 1: Survival rate
Stage 2: Height, girth, number of leaves, survival and a statement of their

growth vigour
As these trials take a short period, the FFS may decide to try several
species, one at a time to gain knowledge on the different species they
encounter in their locality.
g. Types of seedling beds

There are numerous types of seedling beds in use. However, some are
more appropriate for use in different climatic zones than others. In this
281
trial, you are expected to learn the different types of bed to use in your
area. Two types of beds shall be considered: these are the sunken beds
and the raised beds. The other nursery conditions shall be maintained the
same, which is, the species, age of seedlings, spacing, size of pots and
the watering regime.
Raised seedling bed Sunken seedling bed
Procedure
Immediately after pricking out, put 50 seedlings into each of these
two beds.
Duration
1 month
It is possible to conclude this test even within a shorter period depending
on the growth rate of the species.
AESA parameters
Height, girth, survival of seedlings, number of leaves.
h. Different techniques of grafting

In this trial, you are expected to learn the different grafting techniques for
mangoes. The main question shall be; which among the various grafting
techniques is more appropriate than the others? Two grafting techniques
shall be compared; these are the side or splice grafting and the top, cleft
or wedge grafting. The other conditions including the size of rootstock,
the source and size of scion and the general management of the grafts
shall be maintained as similar as possible. For mangoes, the best season
for this practice is May. The grafts shall be observed for a period of four
(4) weeks.
282
Side grafting Cleft grafting Budding
Procedure
Select 50 rootstock of relatively the same size for two grafting treatments.
Acquire 60 scions also of equal size as the root stock from a common
source for mangoes. Prepare and graft 25 root stocks using top grafting
and the other 25 using side grafting. Observe weekly and record the
number of success.
To ensure the person responsible for grafting does not get tired doing one
technique and do the other rather badly, the 2 techniques should be
implemented simultaneously and the same person(s) should do both.
AESA parameters
Number of successful grafts, number of branches developed, girth.
• Which method was more difficult and why?
• Which method was more successful and why?
• What were the advantages and disadvantages of both grafting
techniques?
i. Post grafting management of seedlings

In this trial you are expected to learn through comparisons the most
appropriate technique for successful grafting in as far as the covering of
the grafts is concerned. The key question shall then be: do we need to
cover the newly grafted seedlings with a polyethylene bag?
The treatments in this trial shall be: newly grafted seedlings covered with
polyethylene bags and others not covered. The other management
practices shall be maintained as similar as possible including the variety
of fruits, the grafting technique and all other nursery practices.
283
Covered grafts Not covered
Duration
21 days
Procedure
Graft 50 seedlings of mangoes of the same variety and cover each
seedling with a polyethylene bag. Graft another 50 seedlings using the
same batch of scions and root stock and leave them uncovered. Put all
the grafted seedlings close together such that they are tended together
at all times including during watering.
AESA parameters
Number of successful grafts.
j. Effect of age of root stock on rate of grafting success

While undertaking grafting, it is often that the required rootstocks are not
available in the nursery. These are consequently obtained from other
nurseries, where they are normally remnants from the previous year’s
stock (which are generally old) or the newly raised stock, which are often
very young and tender. The objective of this trial is to establish which is
the most appropriate rootstock to use for grafting in such situations?
Treatment
Two types of rootstocks of the same species shall be obtained: old and
young. These shall be grafted with scions from the same source and grafted
using the same technique. For each batch, 20 grafted seedlings shall be
prepared. All of them shall be subjected to similar nursery practices.
Duration
21 days
Procedure
Graft 20 old seedlings of mangoes and another 20 young ones using the
same batch of scions. Put all the grafted seedlings together but in a
284
manner that is easy to identify each of them. Give the grafted seedlings
similar nursery management practices.
To ensure the person responsible for grafting does not get tired doing one
rootstock and do the other rather badly, the 2 rootstocks should be
implemented simultaneously and the same person(s) should do both.
AESA parameters
Number of successful grafts.
k. Effect of position of a seedling in a seedling bed

This trial presupposes that the position of a seedling in a bed has some
bearing on the tending and therefore the health of the seedling. The key
question then is; does the position of the seedling in a bed affect its
growth performance?
Treatment
A total of 144 seedlings of the same species shall be pricked out on the
same day into polyethylene tubes/bags of the same size filled with the
same soil medium. These shall be arranged in a 12 by 12 arrangement in
a bed. The seedlings shall then be subjected to similar tending practices
Duration
3 months
Procedure
After pricking out, arrange the seedlings in rows of 12 until the 12th row.
Seedlings in the outer 2 rows on all 4 sides shall be considered as being in
the periphery while those in the inner 8 by 8 rows shall be considered to
be in the middle. Therefore, 80 seedlings are in the periphery while 64 are
in the middle.
285
AESA parameters
Survival, height growth, girth.
l. Effect of fertilizer and manure on seedling growth

The soil in our farms is normally deficient in plant nutrients due to
continuous cultivation . However, this is the only soil available on the farm
for raising the forest trees before planting them in the field.
While the growth rate may be negatively affected by lack of or limited

plant nutrients, addition of fertilizer and/or manure may improve the
growth rate and therefore shorten the nursery duration. The key question
in this trial therefore is: is there any effect on the growth rate of seedlings
as a result of adding either fertilizers or manure?
Treatment
Select 300 young seedlings of the same species, age and in similar
containers. Divide them into 3 batches of 100 seedlings each. In batch
1 add fertilizer (approximately 5 gm per seedling). In batch 2 add manure
(2 handfuls per seedling) and then mix thoroughly with the soil and water
heavily. Batch 3 shall be left as the control.
Fertilizer Manure Control
Duration
3 months
Procedure
Put 300 seedlings of relatively the same size in 3 batches of 100 seedlings
each. Among the first batch of 100 seedlings, add fertilizer at the rate of
1 teaspoonful per seedling. In the second batch add manure at the rate
of one handful per seedling while the third batch shall be left as it is.
Subsequently give similar nursery management treatments to the

3 batches.
AESA parameters
Height growth, girth.
286
m. Watering frequency
The common believe among tree growers, is that watering must be
carried out twice daily at all times to produce healthy vigorously growing
seedlings. As a result there is a general tendency of over watering of
seedlings in some situations, such as during cold period thus causing
retarded growth or death of seedlings. This is especially so among pine
seedlings. Consequently as tree growers, you need to know how
frequently you should water the seedlings of different species.
Treatment
Treatments involving different watering frequency shall be applied. These are:
• Water once daily
• Water twice daily and
• Water once every other day
Once per day Twice per day Once every other day
Duration
4 months
Procedure
Select 150 seedlings of the same species that are relatively young and of
the same size. Divide them into 3 batches of 50 seedlings each.
Seedlings in batch 1 are to be watered once daily, batch 2 to be

watered twice a day while batch 3 shall be watered after every other
day. All other nursery practices should be maintained the same for all
three batches. For example you shall use the same water source,
seedlings put in pots of same size and watering must be done properly
and at the same time (either evening or morning for all seedlings
whenever it is done).
AESA parameters
Height growth, girth, survival.
287
n. Effect of root pruning on seedlings growth

Root pruning involves the cutting back of roots of seedlings that normally
develop beyond the confines of the container. It is done to ensure that
the seedlings do not get established in the nursery. Therefore it remains
easy to shift seedlings in the nursery from one point to the other including
taking them to the field during planting. However, this operation
interferes with the normal growth of the seedlings. Consequently,
considering that it is essential that sturdy seedlings of the right size must
be raised in the nursery, the key question is, is it necessary to root prune?
Treatment
After pricking out 100 seedlings into polyethylene bags, divide randomly
into two groups of 50 seedlings. One batch of 50 seedlings shall be
subjected to root pruning whenever the roots develop beyond the
confines of the container while the other batch of 50 seedlings shall be
left with no disturbance. Other nursery operations shall be maintained in
a similar manner as much as is practical. During weeding of seedlings,
the ones not to be root pruned should not be lifted, as this causes the
roots to be severed.
Seedlings not root pruned Root pruned seedlings
Duration
4 months
AESA parameters
In the nursery: Height, girth.
In the field: Survival, height growth.
288
7. Home Garden
Objectives
In this trial, you will test the four main species or varieties of vegetables,
root crops, herbs/medicinal plants or spices, in the traditional home
garden. You shall practice the propagation and management, monitor
the performances and compare the production and cost effectiveness.
Material
Implements for land preparation and cultivation, seeds of several
vegetables, small fruits, root crops, herbs/medicinal plants/spices, locally
available organic manure, fertilizer, chemicals, tape measure, ruler, sticks,
string, notebooks and pencil.
Layout
289
Procedures
1. In each sub group select one favourable species to try. If there are
many sub groups intending to try the same species, it may be
necessary to differentiate the subgroups by assigning different
varieties of the same species and compare their performance. The
facilitator shall, while respecting the members preferences, guide
them not to select inappropriate species, which are unlikely adapt to
the environmental conditions of the particular location.
2. Select a piece of land measuring 8m by 8m with relatively uniform soil
characteristics on a flat or gently sloping area near the homestead.
This land should be provided by one member of the group – the
“Host Farmer”.
3. Members shall also enter into an agreement with the host farmer on
the sharing of the product after harvesting.
4. Prepare the land by clearing and hoeing before the sowing.
5. Mark and stake out the plot (8m by8 m) with sticks or poles in four
small planting ridge of 1m by 4m as shown in the layout. The ridges
should be along the contour.
6. Divide each row into two and agree on which side to apply
manure/fertilizer and which side to be left as the control (see the
layout figure). Apply manure/fertilizer into the side of the row agreed
by the group.
7. Construct a fence to protect from livestock including chicken.
8. Develop the seedbed separately for the species, which require it.
Transplant to the rows developed. If the species do not require a
seedbed and the planting materials are big enough, plant directly
into the rows.
9. Develop the ridges and plant the seed/seedling/planting materials.
Spacing and height of rows will depend on the species selected. If
you are not sure consult an agriculturalist. Each species shall be
planted at the spacing recommended.
10. The group can reduce the cost of chemicals by using tobacco,
Datura, hot pepper, Neem or other herbal extract, etc.
11. Weed the plot according to normal farming practice.
12. At regular intervals during the season, monitor crop growth
performance i.e. height, circumference, number, width and length
of leaves; number and size of corns, and record the observation of
at least three plants in each plot of 4m by 1m. Observe pest and
disease both in crops also.
290
13. When the vegetables/root crops/herbs/medicinal plants/spices are

ready, the group should meet and agree on the day to harvest.
14. During harvesting, record the yields and if the produce is sold, record
also the income from each side of 1m by 4m ridge and each of the
four vegetable species or varieties for further cost benefit analysis.
• Was there any yield difference between the half ridge with
fertilizer/manure or mixture of fertilizer and manure, and the control
(the half row without manure or fertilizer)?
• What measures has the group put in place to ensure harvesting is
done well?
• Were there any advantages and disadvantages of using fertilizer or
manure on the yields?
• What were some of the problems encountered in the
establishment and management of the garden?
291
8. Beekeeping
Objectives
Beekeeping generates income in the short term through production of
honey, beeswax and other products (2 to 3 times a year depending on
season and environmental conditions). For learning purposes, in this trial
you will compare the performance of several types of bee hives:
Langstroth hive, Box hive (similar to Langstroth type but without an inner
frame), Traditional log hive, Improved log hive with queen excluder and
Kenya Top Bar hive(KTBH) to determine the most appropriate type for
the members.
Material
Langstroth Beehive, Kenya Top Bar Hive or Box Hive, Local Beehive, Wire
mesh (Queen Excluder), Hanging Wire, Treated Posts, Bee Suits, Smoker,
Hive Tools, Gum Boots, Torch..
Layout
2 to 3 types of hives can be selected depending on the provided
learning budget.
292
Procedures
1. At the beginning of the enterprise, you can ask members to list all
flowering plants around the site including crops and weeds e.g.
Acacia, Eucalyptus, Beans, Sun flower so that they can understand
the existing vegetations or resources which will benefit the bees.
Since nectar and pollen are the principal diet for bees, farmers
should understand which kinds of flowering plants are available in
the area. Through long term AESA observations on flowers, farmers
may realize and appreciate the importance of existing vegetation
especially forest resources.
2. Start preparing in February or August. March and September are
good months for accumulation of honey by bees because the
intensity of sunlight is high during these months. March is also a
flowering season for many acacia trees.
3. Site selection and Preparation: The site for an apiary should be far
from human activity such as homesteads and grazing areas. The site
should have shade for hives and free from weeds and bushes, which
will attract ants or other bee enemies.
4. Colonization: Initially start with only the Brood Box (without Super Box)
in the apiary. When bee swarms in the area start (usually end of
March), hang or put the hives on the trees at the height of 2 to 3 m,
the usual height the traditional hives are hung. This is because swarms
of bees usually fly at that height. If natural forest is close to your place,
you can hang the box temporarily in the forest to catch bees.
5. Transferring the colonised hive to permanent site and first inspection:
After 2 weeks, put down the hives at the apiary and conduct the first
practical/open hive inspection. If the colony has developed in less
than 4 frames out of 10 to11, you can conclude that it is a weak
colony. In this case release the queen and hang hive again to catch
another swarm. If more than 5 frames are occupied, you can
conclude it is a strong colony and you can continue with the colony.
[Whether a colony is strong or weak will depend on the queen’s
capacity but if you keep weak colonies for a long time, this will attract
wax moth which eventually destroys them].
6. Weekly AESA observation (Visual Inspection): Visual observations
should be conducted during weekly AESA sessions. The following
parameters are important to be considered.
General Site Observations:
• Cleanliness or sanitary condition: Weeds/grasses around the apiary
• Activeness of bees: Whether bees are flying in and out actively
• Pests and Enemies around: are there ants or beetles getting into
the hive?
• Ants (Preventable by hanging hive with wire smeared with
grease)
• Big Beetles (Reduce the size of entrance holes in hive)
293
Others Surrounding Environment Analysis:

• Availability of Flowers: Flowering Plants, Species, Quantity
• Availability of Water: Source (Rivers, Ponds, Others), Distance
Information on which month different kind of flowers are
available in the area or the phenological data of the different
tree species collected by the groups will be a very good source
of information for new farmers who want to start beekeeping
and even for researchers.
An example of AESA sheet is shown in next page:
7. Monthly inspection: Conduct practical open hive inspection
monthly. Wear bee suits properly, use smoker to reduce
aggressiveness of bees. Open hives to inspect pests and diseases,
count how many frames are occupied by the colony. For monthly
AESA, both visual & practical open hive inspection data should be
recorded. Practical AESA parameters are as follows:
Colony assessment:
• Number of frames occupied
• Pests and enemies in the Hive
• Diseases
8. If you find that all frames in the brood box are fully occupied during
monthly inspection and there are many flowers around, put queen
excluder and super box on the top of brood box. Only honey will be
stored in the super box since the queen will not able to lay eggs in
the super box. If you find all the frames in the first super box are
occupied and again there are still many flowers around, you could
add a second super box for increased honey production.
9. The amount of honey, that is, weight produced and the prices sold
from each hive will be recorded for each hive separately. The data
will be summed and analysed after 6 months or one year to
compare the performance of each hive in terms of quantity of
honey produced and income generated.
294
295
• How many Kilograms of honey have been produced from each
type of hive (calculate per year); which type produced more
honey?
• Which hive produced better quality honey?
• From the different types of hives, are there any other products
rather than honey that you may get in future?
• Which type of hive is easier to manage?
• Compare the cost of each hive and the quantity of honey
harvested. Which is the most cost effective type?
296
9. Fish Farming
Objectives
In this trial you will introduce a comparative experiment either between
sole species and combined species of fish in the pond.
Material
Fingerlings of Tilapia, Catfish, Fish Feeds (Initial), Fish Net.
Layout
Procedures
1. Select a relatively flat site where there is permanent water at all
times. Clayish soil is better.
2. Construct two fish ponds. The commercial size of fish pond should be
200 to 300m3 but for FFS practice and experiment, 4m x 4m x 1m
(16m3) will be applicable. If the ponds are constructed close to each
other, it will be easy to connect them together after the experiment.
The depth of the pond should not be more than 1m.
3. In case the area has poromeric (porous) soil, use plastic sheet at the
bottom and sides to maintain water in the pond.
297
4. Consult your fishery officer to get advice especially in construction

design of the appropriate pond.
5. Put fresh water into the pond. Appropriate depth will be 70 80 cm.
Refill the water after the initial soaking, to the 70 80 cm depth. Leave
for a few days to warm the water. For Tilapia, 24 30°C is a favourable
temperature.
6. Find and purchase fingerlings of Tilapia (Oreochromis niliticus) and
Catfish (Clarias gariepinus) and release into the ponds according to
the plan of experiment (in case of two 4 x 4m pond, 40 Tilapia
fingerlings in each pond and 8 of fingerlings of Catfish in one of the
ponds. Feed them with same quantity of concentrated feed several
times per day or as instructed by the fishery officers in the area.
7. If two species of fingerlings are not available, release the same
number of Tilapia fingerling into both ponds (in case of two 4m x 4m
pond, 40 Tilapia fingerlings in each pond). Feed one pond with
concentrated feed and the other with traditional feed.
8. Monitor fish and water condition every week. Sample some fish and
measure them on a monthly basis.
9. After 10 to 12 months, capture all fishes and measure their weight
and evaluate the results of both ponds.
• In which pond was the growth of Tilapia better? Is there any
advantage of combining tilapia with catfish in the same pond?
• In which pond was the growth of Tilapia is better when fed with
different feeds? Is there any advantage in using concentrated
feed over the traditional feed?
• Among the male and female fish, which grew faster? What kind of
growth strategy can be taken to improve fish growth?
• In your opinion, is fish farming really profitable considering the cost
and work load involved?
298
10. Poultry Keeping

Objectives
In this trial you will introduce a comparative experiment either between
local and grade chicken or the difference in growth of same class of
chickens under traditional and modern feeding system.
Material
Day old chick (Grade layer), Chick (Local breed), Housing Material, Wire
mesh, Nails, Feeders, Drinkers, Drugs & Vaccines, Feed (Initial).
Procedures 1. Different types of chicken

1. Agree among members on which type of chicken rearing method;
free range, semi caged or full caged the group is going to use.
2. Construct two appropriate sized cages as agreed among the
members.
3. Procure same number of local and grade chick e.g. 20 local chick
and 20 grade ones.
4. Feed both of them with the same chick feed using the same quantity
and frequency as recommended by the livestock officer of the area.
5. At regular weekly intervals during the year, monitor the size and
health condition among the local and grade chicken.
6. When they start laying eggs, record the number produced daily for
one month.
7. Summarise the production among local and grade chicken and
analyse the result and conclude.
Procedures 2. Different methods of chicken rearing

1. Agree among members on the type of chicken the group is going to
raise and how many.
2. Agree among members on the husbandry methods; free range,
semi caged and full caged, the group is going to compare.
3. Purchase agreed number (e.g. 40) of agreed type of chicken and
divide into two populations (e.g. 20 + 20).
4. One group may be reared semi caged while the other is left free
ranging.
5. Feed both of them using the same diet with equal quantity of feed
at the frequency recommended by the livestock officer of the area.
299
6. At regular weekly intervals during the year, monitor the size and
health condition in both groups of chicken.
7. When they start laying eggs, record the number of egg produced
daily for one month by each group.
8. Summarise the production under both husbandry and analyse the
results and conclude.
Procedures 3. Different types of feed

1. Agree among members on which types of chicken the group is
going to raise and how many.
2. Agree among members on which type of chicken rearing method;
free range, semi caged and full caged the group is going to use.
3. Purchase the agreed number (e.g. 40) of agreed type of chicken
and divide into two populations (e.g.20 + 20).
4. Feed one population with the diet recommended by the livestock
officer while the other is reared through traditional or conventional
practice.
5. At regular weekly interval during the year, monitor the size and health
condition in both groups of chicken.
6. When they start laying eggs, record the number of egg produced
daily for one month.
7. Summarise the production from both groups of chicken, analyse the
result and conclude.
• Was there any difference in the period before initial egg
production between local and grade chicken?
• Was there any difference in the production of eggs between free
range, semi caged and full caged chicken?
• Was there any difference between the two different types of feeds
on both local and grade chicken?
• Was there any difference in the frequency of egg production and
price of eggs from local and grade chicken?
300

Objectives
In this trial you will introduce and experiment with cut and carry fodder
grass for dairy animal feeding and evaluate the change in milk
production, health condition of animals and general workload before
and after introduction of the system.
Material
Napier Grass Cuttings, Fertilizers, Housing Material for making paddocks
or zero grazing unit, Nails, Drugs, Mineral licks, Vaccines, Acaricides.
Layout
Procedures
1. Select a field with relatively uniform soil characteristic on a flat or

gently sloping land. The land should be at least 12m by 18m.
2. Before the rainy season, clear the land of bushes and shrubs.
This should also be ripped using an oxen plough to increase
infiltration of rainwater.
301
3. Before the onset of the rains, identify where the cuttings of Napier
Grass are available.
4. After the onset of the rains, purchase and deliver Napier Grass
cuttings to the planting site.
5. Mark the planting spots in the plots and dig planting holes at a
spacing of 1m by 1m. Plant Napier Grass cuttings as early as possible
so that they can take advantage of the rains for a long period.
6. Construct a fence surrounding the plot. This will be done to ensure
that the whole plot is protected from animals at all times.
7. Weed the plot according to normal farming practice. An oxen
plough should be used to plough the land between crops to improve
water infiltration and its subsequent conservation.
8. At regular weekly intervals during the year, monitor the following in
the plot: height growth of the planted grass, milk production and the
health condition of the animal.
9. When the fodder grass has been established, harvest and weigh
fodder and start feeding the animals.
10. Record milk production daily and health condition of the animals weekly.
11. Evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of feeding Napier
grass to milking animals.
• Was there any difference in milk production before and after
feeding animals with “cut and carry” fodder grass.
• Was there any difference in the health of animals before and after
feeding animals with “cut and carry” fodder grass.
• Was there any difference in the workload or labour requirement
before and after starting to feed the animals with “cut and carry”
fodder grass?
Annex 3. Repository of Templates

303
Annex 3-1. FFS Session Checklist 1
District Division Date
Group
name Membership
Facilitator No. of Sessions

Name carried out so far
Check Item Observations/Problems
Group performance
in general
Attendance of Attendance at Attendance

members the particular day general until date
(Check Register Book.
Is it recorded
properly?)
Schedule/Time Table
(Existing, Are they
followed, Flow of
activities, Starting
time & Ending time?)
Time keeping?
Learning Norms
(Existing? How? Are
they followed?)
Learning site general

(Location, seating
facilities, etc.)
Use of stationary
(Check proper use
and use of colors in
AESA Chart)
Are they enough?

Is there lack or
shortage of any
learning material?
Need addition of any?
304
Sub-groups
(Existing? Name?
Motto? Number?
Role? Active?)
The Host team

Existing?
Role?
Active?
The Role of the

Facilitator
Mode of Facilitation
How?
Enterprises
How is host Farm

Establishment?
Progress so far?
PTD
Is it relevant?
Well addressed to
farmers needs?
Need to modify or
change?
AESA taking, Date Started: No. of AESA to date

Processing &
Presentation
(Stage of crops,
AESA sheet)
NB: If no AESA that day, ask for last AESA taken and
get the details
Special Topics
Existing?
Which topic covered?
Was it relevant?
Mode of Presentation:
(Teaching or
Facilitating?)
305
Group Dynamics
Which type?
Level of
Participation?
Is the message clear?
Is it relevant?
Record Keeping
Existing?
Which type of
records?
Weekly Report
Was it written
properly?
Is input and extension
cost well calculated?
Monitoring by other
officers
Who visited?
Partial visit or full
backstopping?
Level of
Empowerment Equity
among members?
Transparency?
Full Participation?
Confidence?
Knowledge/
Techniques, etc.
Other IGAs
Level of funding
Other Remarks:
306
Annex 3 2. FFS Session Checklist 2
Backstopping Facilitator
Officer Name
FFS Name District
Date Attendance M: F:
Group Performance Check Items
1 Punctuality
Starting Time Good, Fair, Poor 2 Punctuality
Farmers
of
Good, Fair, Poor
Display of
3 Timetable Good, Fair, Poor 4 Sub groups Good, Fair, Poor
5 Participation
Host Team
of
Good, Fair, Poor 6 Time Keeper Good, Fair, Poor
7 Equal Participation
in AESA Taking Good, Fair, Poor 8 Appropriateness
AESA Measurement
of
Good, Fair, Poor
9 AESA Note Taking Good, Fair, Poor 10 Time Allocation for

AESA Taking Good, Fair, Poor
Equal Participation
11 Use of Colour in AESA
Preparation Good, Fair, Poor 12 in AESA Processing Good, Fair, Poor
13 Time Allocation for

AESA Processing Good, Fair, Poor 14 Use of Pointer Good, Fair, Poor
Appropriateness of Use of Talk Ball

15 Today’s Topic Good, Fair, Poor 16 Coherence of group Good, Fair, Poor
Maintenance of Stationary (group Organization)
Coherence of Group
17 Appropriateness
learning site
of
Good, Fair, Poor 18 (Group Organization) Good, Fair, Poor
19 Appropriateness
Learning Site
of
Good, Fair, Poor 20 Sitting Arrangement Good, Fair, Poor
21 Closeness of Learning Attendance

Site to PTD sites
Good, Fair, Poor 22 general till date Good, Fair, Poor
General Attendance
23 Attendance at the
Particular Day
Good, Fair, Poor 24 until date Good, Fair, Poor
How have the Norms

25 Proper
Keeping
Roll Call Book
Good, Fair, Poor 26 been followed? Good, Fair, Poor
Facilitation Skill Check Item
27 Confidence
Facilitation
in
Good, Fair, Poor 28 Facilitation
VS Teaching Good, Fair, Poor
Plainness of
29 Tone of Voice Good, Fair, Poor 30 Language Good, Fair, Poor
Facilitation Skills in Sensitivity for Socially

31 Encouraging Equal Good, Fair, Poor 32 Vulnerable Groups Good, Fair, Poor
Participation
307
Facilitation Skill Check Item

Knowledge and
33 Wrap up Skills after
AESA Presentation Good, Fair, Poor 34 preparation of Good, Fair, Poor
Today’s Topic
35 NOT Taking Lead

(Dominance) Good, Fair, Poor
Neutralism in
36 Facilitation Good, Fair, Poor
37 Punctuality Good, Fair, Poor 38 Use of Sub groups Good, Fair, Poor
39 Use of Local
Knowledge Good, Fair, Poor 40 Flexibility Good, Fair, Poor
41 Understanding
Enterprises
of Good, Fair, Poor 42 Respects to Farmers Good, Fair, Poor
Gender & Illiterate Consideration Check Item
43 Attendance of
Women Members Good, Fair, Poor 44 Seating Position of
Women Members Good, Fair, Poor
Women’s participation in AESA Presentation by

45 Sub Group Activity Good, Fair, Poor 46 Women Good, Fair, Poor
Women’s participation Women’s

47 in Discussion Good, Fair, Poor 48 Participation in Good, Fair, Poor
Dynamics
Overall Interest by
49 Women Members Good, Fair, Poor 50 Talk Ball to Women Good, Fair, Poor
Equal rights and Equal overload to

51 Responsibility between Good, Fair, Poor 52 Women Good, Fair, Poor
Men and Women
Participation of Arrangement/Support
53 Illiterates in Good, Fair, Poor 54 for non literate Good, Fair, Poor
Sub Group Activity Members
Remarks of the Backstopper
Remarks of FFS Facilitator
FFS Facilitator: Sign: Date:
Backstopper: Signed: Date:

308
Annex 3-3. Mobile Phone Weekly FFS Report
Questions Reporting Value
1. Code of FFS
2. Date
3. Starting time
4. End time
5. No FFS Members attended on time
6. No of FFS Members came late
7. No of FFS Members left earlier
8. No of FFS Members absent
9. Did Facilitator come to the Session? Yes / No
10. Did Facilitator come on time? Yes / No
11. Performance of Facilitator Excellent/Good/Fair/Poor/Bad
12. Performance of FFS Members Excellent/Good/Fair/Poor/Bad
13. Issue to discuss with PMU? Yes / No
14. Do you authorize payment to Facilitator? Yes / No
15. Total Saving up today. Ksh.
16. Balance of Group Learning Fund Ksh.
Issues to be discuss with PMU:
Observations
Annex 3-4. Facilitator’s Monthly Report
1.
Name of
Date
Faci itator Enterprise(s) 2.
Name of FFS 3. District
AESA Attendance Host Group

Week Date Fie d Activities Specia Topics Remarks
No. W M T Team Dynamics
Observation(s) Group Prob em(s) Recommendation(s)
Conc uding Remarks:

309
310
Annex 3-5. Problem Report by Facilitators
Faci itator Name District FFS Date
Prob em Action taken/ Suggestions by Recommendation by

Countermeasures the Faci itator HQ

Annex 3-6. Empowerment Process Report
Group District Division Month
Individuals Members
Examples of Change No. Name Changes Observed Background/Remarks
• Participation in group
activity improved
• Became confident in 1
presentation
• Became less shy in front
of others
• Became more social
to others
2
• Become better in
self-explanation
• Tried new ideas by
him/herself
• Taught what he/she
learnt to others 3
• Realized own hidden talent
• Became respected
by others
• Became disciplined
• Attend to other functions
4
• Started to go to a formal
school/studying
• Got employment
• Got more income
• Got more time to try other
new things 5
• More diversified farm/ GA
activities
311
312
Group
Examples of Change No. Changes Observed Background/Remarks
• New bylaw/reinforced
existing bylaw
• Time management 1
improved
• More cohesive
• Full participation by
all members
• More participation
indecision making 2
• Less dominance of
group officials
• mproved leadership skill
• Started new group
activities/ GAs
3
• ncrease of group fund
• Applied/Acquired
fund/assistance
• More transparent in fund

management
• Group fund accounting
improved
• Less disparity among the
members
• Participated in community
events
• Became popu ar with the
neighbors
• ncrease of members
• Re ated to the formation
of new group
Note & Report when the changes were observed

313
Annex 3-7. Group Location Map

314
Annex 3-8. RuralInvest Module 2 Form

315
316
317
318
319
320
3-9. Final Session Report
Name of FFS Group:
District:
Division:
Name of Facilitators:
321
3-9-1. Ballot Box Exercise

No of Members
No Questions Correct Wrong
1
2
3
4
5
6
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
Result of Discussion/Observation/Recommendation:
322
3-9-2. PCE Analysis: Enterprise 1:
Result of Discussion 1: Differences observed between the plots
Evaluation Criteria Plot 1 Plot 2 Plot 3 Comment

323
Result of Discussion 2: Which one seems more suitable for your farm?
Result of Discussion 3: And why do you think so?
Result of Discussion 4: Advantage of PCE
Result of Discussion 5: Advantage of AESA
Other Observation/Recommendation:
324
3-9-3. Result of Cost Benefit Analysis

325
3-9-4. Result of Self Evaluation Session
Question 1: Most EXCITING experiences by the members:
Most exciting experiences
1
2
3
4
5
6
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
326
Question 2: Most disappointing experiences by the members:
Most disappointing experiences
1
2
3
4
5
6
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
327
Question 3: Changes in the Group:
Changed Where? Before FFS After FFS

328
Question 4: Changes in the FFS Members:

329
Question 5: Changes in the MEMBERS’ FARM:
Observation/ Comments/ Recommendations:

330
Question 6: Overall evaluation of the Livelihood Farmer Field School
5. Very Good 4. Good 3. Fair 2. Bad 1. Very bad
Observation/ Comments/ Recommendations:

331
3-9-5. Result of Way Forward Session
1. PCE/AESA
2. IGA
3. FFS
332
4. Other activities
5. Proposed Action Plan and the Level of Group Commitment
6. Observations/Recommendations/Comments by Facilitator:
333
Annex 3-10. RuralInvest Module 3 Format

334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
Annex 4. Example of TOF programme for Extension Facilitators
DAY TIMES TOPIC FACILITATOR
SUNDAY ARRIVAL
8.00-10.00 Welcome address

Outline of course programme
Overview of the project and
workshop objectives
Overview FFS in forest extension
Official opening
10.00-10.30 BREAK
10.30-1.00 Participatory introduction of
participants
Leveling of expectation
Setting of learning norms
Monday Participants grouping and class
Functions of host team
Ballot box exercise
1.00-2.00 LUNCH
2.00-4.00 Introduction to FFS methodology
(background to FFS)
What is FFS
Objective of FFS
Principles of FFS
4.00-4.20 BREAK
4.20-6.00 Key characteristics of FFS approach
Group dynamic activity
(Nine dot game)
8.00-8.20 Recapitulation Host team

8.20-10.00 Concept of ecosystem
Field work on ecosystem concept
10.00-10.30 BREAK Host team
10.30-1.00 Presentation and discussion of
field work
Concept of what is this/what is that?
Tuesday Field exercise
Field work presentation
1.00-2.00 LUNCH Host team
2.00-4.00 Concept of AESA
Steps of conducting AESA
Field activity on AESA
Field work processing
4.20-6.00 Presentation of field work
346

8.20-10.00 Participatory discussion on forest
policy
10.30-1.00 Principles of experimentation
Introduction to Participatory
Technology Development (PTD)
Wednesday Steps in establishing PTD in FFS sites
2.00-4.00 Field Exercise on PTDs
Field work processing and
presentation
4.20-6.00 Examples of Forestry PTDs &
Livelihoods PTD (Activity catalogue)

8.20-10.00 Participatory discussion on group
dynamics
10.30-1.00 Participatory discussion on special
topics concept
Concept of participation
Thursday 1.00-2.00 LUNCH Host team
2.00-4.00 Conflict management
Lessons learnt on FFS and
experience-sharing
Video show on FFS
4.20-6.00 Brief on FFS Field Visit

8.20 -1.00 Field visit: All
(i) Subuku FFS
(ii) Ogligei FFS
Friday 1.00-2.00 LUNCH Host team
2.00-4.00 Processing of data from field activity All
4.00- 4.20 BREAK Host team
4.20- 6.00 Presentation of feedback from All
field visit

8.00- 8.20 Recapitulation Host team
8.20 - 10.00 Introduction to non-formal
education methods
Saturday 10.00-10.30 BREAK Host team
10.30- 1.00 HIV and AIDS
Gender
1.00- 2.00 LUNCH Host team
FREE
347

8.20-10.00 Steps in conducting FFS
implementation
• Classical approach
• Steps in Livelihood FFS
approach
10.30-1.00 Ground working
• Village Immersion
(“Do-it-yourself-in-the-Village”)
Monday • Formation of new groups
• Selection from existing groups
Selection of participants
Site and host farmer selection
Learning site preparations &
stationeries
2.00-4.00 FFS curriculum
Field school schedule
4.20-6.00 Drug and substance abuse

8.20-10.00 Participatory discussion on
• Communication skills
• Folk media
10.30-1.00 Participatory Discussion on
• Facilitation Skills
• Leadership skills
Tuesday
2.00-4.00 LFFS management formats
Participatory Monitoring and
Evaluation (P.M. &E)
4.20-6.00 P.M. & E continued
Ballot Box Exercise
Brief on FFS Field Visit

8.20 -1.00 Field visit: All
(i) Thairira FFS
(ii) Kikapu FFS
Wednesday 1.00-2.00 LUNCH Host team
2.00-4.00 Processing of data from All
field activity
4.00- 4.20 BREAK Host team
4.20- 6.00 Presentation of feedback from All
field visit
348

8.20-10.00 Participatory Discussion on
• Entrepreneurship
10.30-1.00 Participatory discussion on FFS -
• Field days
• Graduation
• Post graduation activities
• Networking & collaboration
Thursday in FFS
2.00-4.00 Participatory discussion on
• Grant Proposal writing
• Finalization of FFS curriculum
and action plan
4.20-6.00 Way forward/Development
of action plan
Rehearsal of Mini FFS

Presentation of action plans
10.30-1.00 Implementation framework
Friday Course Evaluation
1.00-2.00 LUNCH ALL
2.00-4.00 Presentation of folk media &
mini FFS by participants
Awarding of certificates
Official closing
SATURDAY DEPARTURE
349
Annex 5. Example of TOF Programme for Farmer Facilitators

8:00-10:15 Official opening ARGO Head
Overview of TOF programme
Introduction of participants
Leveling of expectation
Setting of learning norms
Sub-groups & function of
host team
Overview of the FFS approach
Monday 10:15-10:30 BREAK Host team
10:30-12:30 FFS Time table
FFS learning site
Host farm
12:30-14:00 LUNCH Host team
14:00-15:30 Facilitation
What is this what is that?
15:30-15:45 BREAK Host team
15:45-17:00 Concept & Importance of AESA

08:00-08:15 Recapitulation Host team
08:15-10:15 AESA practical session
Principle of experimentation
10:30-12:30 Case study on experimental
design
Examples of experimental design
Tuesday 12:30-14:00 LUNCH Host team
14:00-15:30 Participatory discussion on
agricultural & forestry enterprises
15:45-17:00 Result analysis
Field visit briefings
Recapitulation

06:30 Departure to FFS site Host team
09:00-12:30 Visit FFS group
Wednesday 12:30-14:00 LUNCH Host team
14:00-17:00 Feedback of FFS activities
Experience sharing
350

08:15-10:15 Farming as business
Income Generating Activities
Cost Benefit Analysis
10:30-12:30 Record keeping
Learning Proposal
Tuesday Weekly Report
12:30-14:00 LUNCH Host team
14:00-15:30 Group dynamics / Folk Media
Exchange Visit
15:45-17:00 Field day
Evaluation of FFS

08:15-10:15 Graduation
Event Calendar
Participatory Discussions on Post
graduation activities
10:30-11:00 Question & Answer Session
Friday 11:00-14:00 LUNCH Host team
14:00-15:30 Preparation of Facilitation Plan
Presentation of Facilitation Plan
15:45-17:00 Course evaluation
Presentation of Folk Media
Official closing
351
Reference and Future Reading
Bishop Sambrook, C. (2003) Labour saving technologies and

practices for farming and household activities in Eastern and
Southern Africa. Rome, IFAD.
Bishop Sambrook, C. et al. (2004) Conservation agriculture as

labour saving practice for vulnerable households. Rome, FAO/IFAD.
Family Health International (2005) Youth participation guide:

assessment, planning, and implementation.
FAO & International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (2004). Manual

on integrated soil management and conservation practices.
FAO Links Project (2005) Building on gender, agrobiodiversity and

local knowledge: a training manual.
FAO (1996) Integrated pest management (IPM), Field guide on

gender and IPM.
FAO (1997) A training of trainers course for IPM farmer trainers.
FAO (1999) A manual to facilitate participatory planning activities

for community IPM.
FAO (2000) Guidelines and reference material on integrated soil

and nutrient management and conservation for Farmer Field
Schools.
FAO (2000) Manual on integrated soil management and

conservation practices. FAO Land and Water Bulletin No. 8.
FAO (2000) Small ponds make a big difference, integrating fish with
crop and livestock farming.
FAO (2001) Future forests book and Teachers’ guide.
FAO (2001) Participatory training in farmers’ water management.

Training manuals.
FAO (2003, a) HIV/AIDS and the livestock sector. (fact sheet).

352
FAO (2006, b) HIV/AIDS extension fact sheets.
FAO (2003, c) Optimizing soil moisture for plant production, the

significance of soil porosity. FAO Soils Bulletin No. 79. Includes
companion CD ROM.
FAO (2004) Addressing HIV/AIDS through agriculture and natural

resource sectors: a guide for extension workers.
FAO (2004) Family nutrition guide.
FAO (2004) SEAGA guide for extension workers.
FAO (2006) Impact Assessment Report, FAO JICA, Rome.
FAO/UNDP (2002) The empowerment of Farmer Life Schools.
FAO/UNDP/World Education (2004) Farmer Life School Manual.
IIRR (1992) Crops and Cropping Systems. Metrol Manila, Philippines.
IIRR (1992) Livestock and Poultry Production. Metrol Manila,

Philippines.
IIRR (1992) Related Agroforestry Livelihood Technologies. Metrol

Manila, Philippines.
IIRR (1992) Seeds and Plant Propagation. Metrol Manila, Philippines.
IIRR (1992) Soil and Water Conservation (SWC) Technologies and

Agroforestry Systems. Metrol Manila, Philippines.
IIRR (1992) Trees and Their Management. Metrol Manila, Philippines
IIRR (1998) Sustainable Agriculture Extension Manual for Eastern &

Southern Africa. Africa Regional Office, Nairobi, Kenya.
IIRR (2002) Managing Dryland Resources, A manual for Eastern and

Southern Africa. Africa Regional Office, Nairobi, Kenya
International Potato Center (1999) Farmer Field School for

Integrated Crop Management of Sweet potato.
353
Kenya/Japan Social Forestry Training Project (1991) Social Forestry

Techniques. Kitui, Kenya.
Kim Groeneweg, Gertrude Buyu, Danne Romney and Bruno

Minjauw (2006) Livestock Farmer Field Schools, Guidelines for
Facilitation and Technical Manual. Wolvenstraat 72, 3512 CH
Utrecht, Netherlands, ILRI, Nairobi, Kenya.
Peace Corps (2000) Life skills manual.
The Farm Level Applied Research Methods for East and Southern
Africa GCP/RAF/334/SWE (2001) A Study Guide for Farmer Field
Schools, Water harvesting and Soil Moisture Retention. Ministry of
Agriculture and Rural Development, Kenya. FARMESA, Harare,
Zimbabwe.
UNICEF & Department of Health South Africa (2001) South African

National Guidelines for People Living with TB, HIV/AIDS, and other
Chronic Debilitating Conditions.
WFP (2000) WFP Guide to Participatory Techniques and Tools.
World Bank (2003) Education and HIV/AIDS: a sourcebook of

HIV/AIDS prevention programmes.
World Vision International (2004) ADP toolkit for HIV/AIDS

programming.
FFS Manual cover_Layout 1 11/01/12 12.54 Pagina 3
FFS Manual cover_Layout 1 11/01/12 12.54 Pagina 1
The positive experience in implementing the Intensified Social Forestry

Project in Semi-Arid Areas in Kenya has resulted in the adoption of the
Farmer Field School (FFS) platform by Kenya and other countries for their
extension programmes as a management tool that can increase the
capacity and responsiveness of both the farmers and the institutions that
utilize the approach.
Farmer Field School

This FFS guide was developed for project designers and managers, as well
as field practitioners who intend to use the FFS platform for extension and
management support to farm forestry or forestry-based livelihood
development. In addition to a basic conceptual framework, the guide
provides the know-how for managing effective FFS extension activities, Implementation Guide
and integration of the FAO RuralInvest toolkit and a mobile-phone based
monitoring system in the FFS platform.
FARM FORESTRY AND

FFS Guide

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

FFS Guide

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

FFS Guide

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

FAO Manual Part I, II, III Prove ARRI impaginato 16/02/12 19.

Farmer Field School

FARM FORESTRY AND

Farmer Field School

FARM FORESTRY AND

The designations employed and the presentation of material in this publication

All rights reserved. Reproduction and dissemination of material in this publication

FAO, JICA, and KFS 2011

Office of Public Relations

Director, Kenya Forest Service (KFS)

Intensified Social Forestry Project

Project Management 11. Charles M. Makau

Divisional Forest Extension Officers JICA Experts

Part I: Key Principles of Farmer Field School 25

Part II: FFS Planning and Management 39

Part III: Field Manual for Field Facilitators 59

Step 1: Ground Working and Promotion 63

Step 6: Establishment of Enterprise Sites 133

Annex 1. Enterprise Catalogue 232

Annex 2. Study Guide 260

Annex 3. Repository of Templates 302

Annex 4. Example of TOF Programme for Extension Facilitators 345

Annex 5. Example of TOF Programme for Farmer Facilitators 349

Reference and Future Reading 351

Abbreviations & Acronyms

AESA Agro Ecosystem Analysis

LFFS Livelihood Farmer Field School

The Government of Kenya and the Japan International Cooperation

Building on past experiences, ISFP brought a new dimension to forestry

Special thanks to Mr Aidan Gulliver (Senior Economist at the FAO Investment

Background of this Guide

Purpose of the Guide

Earlier versions were developed to assist KFS staff and farmer

20 FARMER FIELD SCHOOLS IMPLEMENTATION GUIDE

This version aims to provide an FFS implementation guide for a wider

Structure of the Guide

Examples of templates for use in the FFS implementation are provided

1. For further in dept

The ISFP experience shows that the dedication and commitment to

Use of this Guide in Other Projects

The positive experience of the ISFP resulted in the adoption within

Experiences in Ethiopia and KFS’s other projects confirmed that TOF

22 FARMER FIELD SCHOOLS IMPLEMENTATION GUIDE

training and provision of a technical manual to FFS facilitators was

The experience of the projects described above, and elsewhere that

After FFS: Integration of FFS with RuralInvest

RuralInvest can provide an institutional framework to support FFS as it

Part I: Key principles of

What is Farmer Field School?

The FFS approach is an innovative, participatory and interactive

FFS is usually a time bound activity (generally one agricultural

Presentation of PCE findings by participants is a key activity in the

26 FARMER FIELD SCHOOLS IMPLEMENTATION GUIDE

BOX 1 FFS and Increase of Community Coherency

The communities of the SLDP target area in the Mau Forest

Part I: Key Principles of Farmer Field School 27

28 FARMER FIELD SCHOOLS IMPLEMENTATION GUIDE

Part I: Key Principles of Farmer Field School 29

How does FFS benefit Farmers?