Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 20 views

    Comparative Study of Septic Tank, Anaerobic Filter, and Anaerobic Baffled Reactor For Treating Domestic Wastewater

    Uploaded by

    Rathborey Chan
    This study compares the performance of septic tanks, anaerobic baffled reactors, and anaerobic filters for treating domestic wastewater. The experiment tested these systems over different hydraulic retention times (24-48 hours) and sludge concentrations (10-20 g/L). Septic tanks achieved 71% COD and 65% TSS removal on average. Anaerobic baffled reactors attained 83% COD and 73% TSS removal, while anaerobic filters obtained 85% COD and 76% TSS removal. Increasing the hydraulic retention time from 24 to 48 hours significantly improved COD removal but had little effect on TSS removal for all systems. Anaerobic filters performed best overall

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Comparative Study of Septic Tank, Anaerobic Filter, and Anaerobic Baffled Reactor For Treating Domestic Wastewater

    Uploaded by

    Rathborey Chan
    20 views1 page
    This study compares the performance of septic tanks, anaerobic baffled reactors, and anaerobic filters for treating domestic wastewater. The experiment tested these systems over different hydraulic retention times (24-48 hours) and sludge concentrations (10-20 g/L). Septic tanks achieved 71% COD and 65% TSS removal on average. Anaerobic baffled reactors attained 83% COD and 73% TSS removal, while anaerobic filters obtained 85% COD and 76% TSS removal. Increasing the hydraulic retention time from 24 to 48 hours significantly improved COD removal but had little effect on TSS removal for all systems. Anaerobic filters performed best overall

    Original Title

    4. pro

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This study compares the performance of septic tanks, anaerobic baffled reactors, and anaerobic filters for treating domestic wastewater. The experiment tested these systems over different hydraulic retention times (24-48 hours) and sludge concentrations (10-20 g/L). Septic tanks achieved 71% COD and 65% TSS removal on average. Anaerobic baffled reactors attained 83% COD and 73% TSS removal, while anaerobic filters obtained 85% COD and 76% TSS removal. Increasing the hydraulic retention time from 24 to 48 hours significantly improved COD removal but had little effect on TSS removal for all systems. Anaerobic filters performed best overall

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    20 views1 page

    Comparative Study of Septic Tank, Anaerobic Filter, and Anaerobic Baffled Reactor For Treating Domestic Wastewater

    Uploaded by

    Rathborey Chan
    This study compares the performance of septic tanks, anaerobic baffled reactors, and anaerobic filters for treating domestic wastewater. The experiment tested these systems over different hydraulic retention times (24-48 hours) and sludge concentrations (10-20 g/L). Septic tanks achieved 71% COD and 65% TSS removal on average. Anaerobic baffled reactors attained 83% COD and 73% TSS removal, while anaerobic filters obtained 85% COD and 76% TSS removal. Increasing the hydraulic retention time from 24 to 48 hours significantly improved COD removal but had little effect on TSS removal for all systems. Anaerobic filters performed best overall

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 1

    វេទិកាស្រាេស្រាេថ្នាក់ាតិ វ ក

    ើ ទី៣
    ការពង្ររឹ ង្រព័ន្អធ េកូឡសូ ៊ី សង្ារ់ការង្ាវង្ាវអៅឧត្តមសិកា

    Title: Comparative Study of Septic Tank, Anaerobic Filter, and Anaerobic


    Baffled Reactor for Treating Domestic Wastewater

    Name of Authors: Borin Heang1,2, Saret Bun1, Rathborey Chan1,3, Phaly Ham1,3

    1
    Affiliation: Faculty of Hydrology and Water Resources Engineering, Institute of Technology of Cambodia,
    Phnom Penh, Cambodia

    2
    Water and Environmental Engineering, Graduate School, Institute of Technology of Cambodia,
    Phnom Penh, Cambodia

    3
    Water and Environment Research Unit, Research and Innovation Center, Institute of Technology
    of Cambodia, Phnom Penh, Cambodia

    Description: Since it is presently impossible to compare the performance of different anaerobic


    treatment systems under the same operating conditions, this study aims to provide a comprehensive
    performance analysis of septic tank (ST), anaerobic baffled reactor (ABR), and anaerobic filter
    (AF) limited to total suspended solids (TSS) and chemical oxygen demand (COD) removal
    efficiency on medium-strength wastewater condition. The experiment was conducted over 4
    conditions with combined variation of hydraulic retention time (HRT) of 24 – 48 hr as well as
    sludge concentration of 10 – 20 g/L of MLSS, while sponge filter media (25 ppi) is selected for
    AF system. ST provided overall COD and TSS removal efficiencies approximate 71 ± 9% and 65
    ± 20%, respectively. ABR achieved 83 ± 5% of COD and 73 ± 15% of TSS, whereas AF reactor
    attained 85 ± 4% and 76 ± 11%, respectively. Extended HRT from 24 hr to 48 hr enhances COD
    removal greatly but has low effect TSS removal to all systems. AF provided best result among the
    three options followed by ABR then ST, while both AF and ABR provided considerably high
    treatment efficiency with HRT of 24 hr. In term of COD removal, ST follows far behind and still
    see increase with prolong HRT, a clear indication of HRT for 48 hr or longer is recommended or
    required. The concentration of approximately 10 g/L of MLSS in system (first compartment) could
    probably high enough for all three system to provide satisfied treatment efficiency in terms of
    COD while higher concentration would only further increase TSS removal efficiency.

    Keywords: septic tank, anaerobic baffled reactor, anaerobic filter

    ថ្ងៃទ៊ី០២ - ០៣ ខែធ្នូ ឆ្នាំ២០២១


    តាមរយៈង្រព័ន្េធ ន្ឡាញ

    You might also like