Nahzatul Shima Binti Abu Sahid Namaf5A 2022519651
Nahzatul Shima Binti Abu Sahid Namaf5A 2022519651
Nahzatul Shima Binti Abu Sahid Namaf5A 2022519651
NAMAF5A
2022519651
Question 1
Hackman (2002) states that one squad is most likely becomes effective when the
following conditions are present. According to Hackman (2002), the effectiveness of
the troops is measured by providing products or customer solemn hope, a growing
army ability from time to time, and meet the needs of team members.
Hackman (2002) goes on to describe five the necessary conditions for the
effectiveness. Hackman suggests evaluating team effectiveness on three criteria:
output, collaborative ability, and individual member development. We find that these
criteria are commonly used and recommend that leaders use them to calibrate their
teams from time to time.
To be successful, the team must have all the talent, knowledge, organizational
influence, experience and technical know-how needed to complete the task. An
effective team consists of people who will collectively bring all competencies forward.
Any weak or missing competence undermines the team's goals. In this case, teams
must strengthen weaknesses or recruit missing competencies - something successful
teams learn as they move forward.
First team essentials is Clear shared goals – with performance metrics: Have you ever
been part of a project team or group that didn't have a clear idea or goal? If anything,
you might understand why groups like this rarely succeed. It is nearly impossible to
succeed when team members cannot articulate clear and shared goals. Team goals
are usually handed down to higher management, who envision a problem or
opportunity and want the team to address it. Ideally, management identifies the goal
but leaves the means to the team. However, team members must share an
understanding of the goals. Otherwise, they will go in different directions, wasting
energy and resources. Conflicts and misunderstandings are guaranteed. Once they
reach a shared understanding of the goals, team members who are aligned with
management, must define them in terms of performance metrics.
Conflict is when two people or groups disagree, and disagreements cause friction.
One party has to feel that the opposite party's views will have a negative impact on
the ultimate decision. for instance, Amin might adore junk campaigns because he's
done some with great results. Nurul probably feels television is that the thanks to go
because nobody reads their letters anymore—they just get thrown away! Each of them
may feel that the opposite approach could be a waste of promoting budget and
therefore the company won't get pleasure from it. Amin will jump in and stop Nurul
from trying to pursue her goal of a television commercial, and Nurul will do the identical
for Amin. Several factors are known to facilitate organizational conflict in certain
circumstances.
Finally, various individual differences, like personal abilities, traits, and skills, can affect
the character of interpersonal relationships. Individual dominance, aggressiveness,
authoritarianism, and tolerance of ambiguity all appear to influence how individuals
pander to potential conflicts. Indeed, those characteristics can determine whether a
conflict is made or not.
Question 3
Organizational socialization is the process by which people learn about, adapt to, and
change the knowledge, skills, attitudes, expectations, and behaviors required for new
or changing organizational roles. Thus, organizational socialization focuses on
organizational membership, which includes how people move from outsiders to
insiders and how people move between organizational roles within and across
organizations over time. To date, research has focused on how occupational
organizations encourage new entrants to align with existing role expectations through
tactics that promote assimilation. However, organizational socialization is a dynamic
process that influences each other. Individuals can also influence and shape
organizations to align with their desires, through personalization tactics. Thus,
organizational socialization describes the process by which an individual takes on a
new role or changes in a way that meets the needs of the organization and the
individual.