FIN302 Report PDF
FIN302 Report PDF
FIN302 Report PDF
Section: 01
Report on
Portfolio Analysis
Date: 09th December 2021
Submitted to:
Mr. Mohammad Fahad Noor
Faculty, Business Finance II (FIN 302)
School of Business, Independent University, Bangladesh (IUB)
Submitted by:
Names ID
Sayeda Tanzila Shabazi (1810088)
1|Page
Letter of Transmittal
Subject: Assignment on Portfolio Analysis of five same Industry and five different Industry.
Dear sir,
With due respect we, the under singed students of IUB have prepared this report on analysis on
2 portfolios of 10 stocks from yahoo finance. The assignment has been completed by the
knowledge that we have gathered from this course that we have learned from you. We also have
taken help from YouTube videos that you provided.
We, also, would like to draw your attention that we tried our level best to complete this assignment
correctly, and gather appropriate information as much as possible. We have tried our upmost to
live up to your standard. May we, therefore, wish and hope that you would be cordial enough to
our hard work and obligation.
Sincerely your
2|Page
Acknowledgement
We would like to express our deepest gratitude to the course coordinator of Independent
University, Bangladesh (IUB) School of Business Department for providing such a professional
yet learning platform for exposing our talents and potentials in the field of FIN.
Our eternal respect towards our Business Finance II (FIN 302), Faculty, Mr. Mohammad Fahad
Noor
We are eternally grateful to him for sharing valuable and incalculable knowledge and guiding us
through all the way in making a successful, neat and clean FIN302 report. Our journey with him
in this course has been truly a worthwhile learning experience.
At the same time, we acknowledge and value the efforts of the team members who have put their
dedication and sincerity upon successfully completing this report work, without their
contributions it would have been an incredibly difficult job to accomplish. We, the group
members have spent considerable amount of time and put effort into designing this very Business
Finance II report. We hope and firmly believe that our faculty will be pleased with the work we
are presenting with.
3|Page
Contents
• Letter of Transmittal ........................................................................................................ 2
• Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 5
• Average Return ................................................................................................................. 6
• Variance ............................................................................................................................. 7
• Standard Deviation ........................................................................................................... 7
• Covariance ......................................................................................................................... 8
• Correlation....................................................................................................................... 10
• Beta ................................................................................................................................... 11
• Variance Covariance Matrix ......................................................................................... 12
• Portfolio Return, Portfolio Variance and Portfolio & Standard Deviation ...................... 15
• Portfolio Beta ................................................................................................................... 16
• Comparison Between two Portfolios ............................................................................. 17
• Evaluation of Optimal Portfolios ................................................................................... 18
• Z Score ............................................................................................................................. 19
• References ........................................................................................................................ 22
4|Page
Introduction
In this assignment, we have analyzed two different types of portfolios. One of them consists of
stocks from the same Industry and another one consists of stocks from different industries. We
have collected our data from Yahoo Finance – Stock Market. For conducting the calculation, we
have taken the monthly closing price of each stock from year 2011-2020. We have done all the
calculation by using MS Excel. Here is ours selected stocks:
Same Industry:
• BHP Group
• Netflix, Inc.
• Walmart Inc.
• American Tower Corporation
• Apple Inc.
5|Page
Average Return
Return in finance is defined as the change in the value of an investment or a stock over time. It can
take the shape of a price change or a percentage change. Investors typically expect a positive return,
which shows a profit or gain on investment. On the contrary, the term "negative return value"
refers to a loss on investment. We had to do the following to achieve the average return:
Calculate the market return on each of the company's closing stock prices individually. The
An investor or analyst can understand the trendline of a company's or a portfolio's return over time.
Then, in Excel, we utilized the formulas below to calculate the average return
Here, United Health Group Incorporated is in lead on average return compared to the other
companies in the same industry.
There is no negative return indicating loss. Netflix Inc has the highest return among these 5
companies.
6|Page
Variance
The term "variance" refers to the calculation of the spread between numbers in a data set. It
calculates the deviation of each number in the set from the mean. The lower the variance, the less
the stock varies widely. In Excel, we used the following formula:
All the company in this portfolio also shows healthy volatility, except for Netflix Inc. Netflix,
Inc stock varies widely.
Standard Deviation
The standard deviation of an investment is a measure of its risk. By determining the variation
between each data point relative to the mean, it is determined as the square root of variance. In
Excel, we used the following formulas:
=SQRT(Variance)
7|Page
Standard Deviation for Portfolio 1
Details Johnson & Pfizer Sanofi Eli Lilly and Company UnitedHealth
Johnson Inc Inc Group
Incorporated
United Health Group Incorporated has a higher standard deviation of 0.132908182 in percentage
it comes around 7.28%. The unpredictability is higher for that company.
Netflix Inc has a higher standard deviation of 15.18%. The unpredictability is higher for that
company.
Covariance
The directional link between the returns of two variables or assets is measured statistically as
covariance. It is used to minimize a portfolio's overall risk by increasing the portfolio's
diversification. A positive covariance suggests that the variables have a tendency to move in the
same direction.
A positive covariance indicated that they tend to move in the same direction, while a negative
suggested that they tend to travel in opposite directions. In addition, the Covariance can have
values ranging from negative infinity to positive infinity.
The formula we used in MS Excel, to calculate the covariance of two stocks was,
8|Page
Covariance For Portfolio 1
Companies covariance
Johnson & Johnson,pfizer inc 0.001261278
Johnson & Johnson,Sanofi Inc 0.001357093
Johnson & Johnson,Eli Lilly and Company 0.001262739
Johnson & Johnson,UnitedHealth Group 0.001211857
Incorporated
Pfizer inc,Sanofi Inc 0.001666053
Pfizer inc,Eli Lilly and Company 0.001306868
Pfizer Inc, UnitedHealth Group Incorporated 0.001919088
Sanofi Inc, Eli Lilly and Company 0.001161972
Sanofi Inc, UnitedHealth Group Incorporated 0.001676153
Eli Lilly and Company, UnitedHealth Group 0.001426507
Incorporated
In this case, all covariances are positive, differences between the values of covariance between
stocks are quite low. All the companies are moving in the same direction, the covariances are all
positive.
9|Page
For portfolio 2, the difference in covariances between the companies are not that high. But
covariance between Netflix inc, and Walmart is negative. This indicates that the companies move
in different direction.
Correlation
The correlation coefficient is a statistical technique that is used to determine how strong a linear
relationship between two securities is. The numbers might be anything between -1 and +1. When
the correlation is positive, the two stocks are traveling in the same direction; when the correlation
is negative, the securities are moving in opposite ways. When the value is 0, it indicates that the
two securities have no linear relationship.
All the correlation values are positive indicating the stocks move in the same direction.
10 | P a g e
Correlation For Portfolio 2
Companies correlation
BHP Group,Netflix, Inc. 0.159463422
BHP Group,Walmart Inc. 0.067877915
BHP Group,American Tower Corporation 0.326558617
BHP Group,Apple Inc. 0.364194663
Netflix, Inc.,Walmart Inc. -0.016558295
Netflix, Inc.,American Tower Corporation 0.080176318
Netflix, Inc.,Apple Inc. 0.129295
Walmart Inc.,American Tower Corporation 0.115862148
Walmart Inc.,Apple Inc. 0.109569013
American Tower Corporation,Apple Inc. 0.40148938
There is one negative correlation between Netflix inc, and Walmart. This further indicates that the
companies move in different directions. Another point to be noted is that the correlation values are
much lower than portfolio 1.
Beta
The beta is a measure of a stock's volatility or sensitivity in relation to the stock market's overall
ups and downs. The beta coefficient can be expressed as follows:
For calculating the beta of the individual stocks, the individual return of each stock was used and
the corresponding return of the market price indexes.
11 | P a g e
Beta For Portfolio 1
Details Johnson & Pfizer Sanofi Eli Lilly and UnitedHealt
Johnson Inc Inc Company h Group
Incorporate
d
Beta 0.78% 3.69% 2.28% 2.80% 1.98%
For portfolio 1, all the stocks moved in the same direction as the market but, Pfizer, Sanofi Inc,
Eli Lilly and Company, and United Health Group incorporated were more volatile than the market.
For portfolio 2, all the stock moved in the same direction as the market but the stock for BHP
group, Netflix inc, Walmart Inc, and American Tower Corporation were more volatile than the
market.
The variance-covariance matrix is a square matrix that contains a network of all variance and
covariance values for the portfolio's variables. The variances of the variables or stocks are
represented by the diagonal values of the matrix, while the covariance between all possible pairings
of stocks are represented by the off-diagonal values of the matrix.
12 | P a g e
Variance Covariance Matrix for Portfolio 1
Variance and
Covariance Matrix
Pfizer Sanofi Inc Eli Lilly United
Johnso Inc and Health Group
n& Company Incorporated
Johnso
n
Johnson & 0.18% 0.13% 0.14% 0.13% 0.12%
Johnson
Pfizer Inc 0.13% 0.35% 0.17% 0.13% 0.19%
Sanofi Inc 0.14% 0.17% 0.35% 0.12% 0.17%
Eli Lilly and 0.13% 0.13% 0.12% 0.36% 0.14%
Company
UnitedHealt 0.12% 0.19% 0.17% 0.14% 0.53%
h Group
Incorporate
d
13 | P a g e
Optimal Portfolios
For calculating the optimal portfolio, we have used the solver function from excel to calculate the
optimal weights automatically by using certain variables where the constraint is that the SUM of
weight shouldn't exceed the value of 1.
JNJ 0.580131829
Total= 1
Total= 1
14 | P a g e
Portfolio Return, Portfolio Variance and Portfolio & Standard Deviation
For calculating portfolio return, portfolio variance and portfolio standard deviation, we have
used the portfolio optimal weights from the previous step.
We have used the formula of
Portfolio 1
Portfolio return 0.006519484
Portfolio SD 0.040030895
Portfolio 2
Portfolio return 0.011099724
Portfolio SD 0.37233457
15 | P a g e
Portfolio Beta
For calculating Beta, we have multiplied the weights with the individual Beta of the
company’s stocks.
Portfolio Beta 2:
Industries Portfolio
Beta
Portfolio Beta 1 :
Industries Portfolio
Beta
JNJ 0.0078
16 | P a g e
Comparison Between two Portfolios
The solver function has helped us to generate optimal weights automatically for these two
portfolios. Based on this, we have calculated the portfolio return, portfolio variance, portfolio
standard deviation and portfolio beta.
Comparison: Among description of these two Portfolio that we describe above, we have come
into a conclusion that portfolio 2 is better. We know that a beta value >1 indicates that the
portfolio will be more volatile than the market. It tells about the portfolio will increase more than
market. That indicates this type of portfolio will increase the portfolio’s risk, but it may also
increase its expected return, positive sign and same direction. That’s why we can say that portfolio
2 is better than portfolio 1. The return of portfolio 2 is also higher. So, Portfolio 2 is more
acceptable.
17 | P a g e
Evaluation of Optimal Portfolios
The gain or loss realized by an investor for an investment in a portfolio including a variety of
assets is referred to as Portfolio Return. When comparing the portfolio returns for the two optimal
portfolios, Optimal Portfolio 1 had a higher return of 0.006519484 and Optimal Portfolio 2 had a
return of 0.011099724. By comparing these two, we can tell that Optimal Portfolio 2 (Different
Industry) is better in terms or return of portfolio as the return for Portfolio 2 is 1.7 times higher
than that of Optimal Portfolio 1 (Same Industry).
Portfolio variance and portfolio standard deviation: Portfolio variance is a measure of a portfolio's
return dispersion, while portfolio standard deviation is a measure of how far an investment return
deviates from the mean of the probability distribution. Optimal Portfolio 1 has the variance of
0.001602473 (0.16%) and standard deviation of 0.040030895 (4%). Optimal Portfolio 2 has the
variance of 0.00138633 (0.1%) and the standard deviation of 0.037233457 (3.72%). By
comparing these values of Optimal Portfolio 1 and Optimal Portfolio 2 we see that Portfolio 1
has higher variance and standard deviation than Portfolio 2. This means the data in Optimal
Portfolio 1 indicates riskier investment as their values are more spread out, but they are still pretty
close.
The relative sensitivity or volatility of a portfolio investment is measured by portfolio beta. A
portfolio with a higher beta carries a higher risk, but it also has a larger return. The portfolio beta
for Optimal Portfolio 1 was 0.016317687 and for Optimal Portfolio 2 was 0.0796807077. We can
see that neither of the portfolios have a high beta meaning they are not as risky and volatile.
However, Optimal Portfolio 2 still has a slightly higher portfolio beta by 0.063 than Portfolio 1,
indicating that it is ever so slightly riskier, but has higher earning potential.
So, in terms of overall performance Optimal Portfolio 2 is performing better than Optimal
Portfolio 1 as it has more expected return. Both portfolios’ performance is pretty close as
suggested by standard deviation and variance. But by comparing the Portfolio Beta, Optimal
Portfolio 2 is riskier. So, for an investor who is risk-averse Optimal Portfolio 1 is the better choice
and for an investor who is a risk taker Optimal Portfolio 2 is the better portfolio as it brings much
higher returns.
18 | P a g e
Z Score
• JNJ 2020
• Pfizer Inc.
=3.3*(8946000000/154229000000) +1.2*(9147000000/154229000000)
+1.0*(41908000000/154229000000+0.6*(304454700000/90756000000) +1.4*(96770000000
/154229000000)
=4,42>2.99
This is indicated that the Z score of Pfizer Inc. is greater than 2.99 that’s why the company
will not be bankrupt.
• Sanofi Inc.
3.3*(14240000000/114529000000) +1.2*(14,50,60,00,000/114529000000)
+1*(37369000000/114529000000) +0.6*(1,18,14,57,00,000/51,38,20,00,000)
+1.4*(51,38,20,00,000/114529000000)
=2.27<2.99
19 | P a g e
This is indicated that the Z score value of Sanofi Inc. is less than 2.99 but greater than 1.81. We
can say that the company is in gray area. We are not sure the company will be bankrupt
or not.
This is indicated that the Z score of Eli Lilly and Company is greater than 2.99 that’s why the
company will not be bankrupt.
• BHP Group
20 | P a g e
• Netflix Inc
=3.3(4585289000/39280359000) +1.2(1,95,57,95,000/39280359000)
+1(24996056000/39280359000) +.6(2,77,10,06,61,000/28,21,51,19,000)
+1.4(7573144000/39280359000)
=7.24>2.99
The value of Z score of Netflix Inc greater than 2.99. So, we can say that this company will not
be bankrupt.
• Walmart Inc
=3.3(22879000000/252496000000) +1.2(2,57,80,00,000.00/ 252496000000) +1($
5,59,15,10,00,000/252496000000) +.6(5,98,53,60,00,000/1,64,96,50,00,000)
+1.4*(88763000000/252496000000)
=5.17>2.99
The value of Z score of Walmart Inc greater than 2.99. So, we can say that this company will not
be bankrupt.
Conclusion
To summarize, we have explained the positions of two distinct Portfolios (each with five firms)
and compared them to the market in this report. The 10 companies with whom we worked ranged
from five that were in the same industry domain, healthcare and others that were in a wide range
of industrial domains. The given individual return, average return, individual risk, market and
portfolio return and risk, and finally, optimal portfolio analysis would give stakeholders and
associated parties with better clarity. We also calculated Z-scores for all of the companies to
evaluate their credit strength and bankruptcy risk. Simply put, this report can serve as a roadmap
for analyzing the financial status of all of the firms on which we worked, as well as assisting
investors in making informed judgments. We created this research in the hopes of assisting
investors who are interested in investing in the following markets and to gain a better
understanding of how these companies' shares or investments differ from the market portfolio.
This study will undoubtedly provide further leverage to a rational investor before investing in
these two stocks. (Yahoo Finance, 2021)
21 | P a g e
References
22 | P a g e