2022 ENR Top 500
2022 ENR Top 500
2022 ENR Top 500
47
Revenue by Owner Type p. 47 // Domestic and International Staff Hiring p. 47 // International Market Analysis p. 48
Past Decade’s Design Revenue p. 48 // Harry W. Nice Bridge Replacement p. 49 // Top 500 Dialogue pp. 50, 59
Top 20 Design Firms by Sector pp. 52-56 // East Midtown Greenway p. 60 // Top 50 Designers in International Markets p. 60
Top 100 Pure Designers p. 63 // Miami Signature Bridge Pour p. 64 // DEI in Design p. 66 // How To Read the Tables p. 66
Top 500 Design Firms List pp. 68-77 // Where To Find the Top 500 p. 78-79
ELEVATE
NUMBER 107
2021-22 at a Glance
TOTAL
DOMESTIC
NUMBER OF FIRMS VOLUME REVENUE
$107.1
NUMBER OF FIRMS
PROFITS REPORTING PROFITABILITY $ BILLIONS
REPORTING
416 SIZE OF BACKLOG
DOMESTIC HIGHER
REVENUE 356
$89.2
INTERNATIONAL
PROFITS
76 INTERNATIONAL
REVENUE
DOMESTIC INTERNATIONAL $17.9
LOSSES LOSSES
10 3 SAME
64
LOWER
34
COMPARING THE
ENR May 2/9, 2022 enr.com
46 DECADE’S
PAST
DESIGN REVENUE $
90.24 $
92.69 $
92.31 $
91.81 92.84
$ $
93.90 $
101.16 $
103.24 $
104.77 $
107.11
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
$ BILLIONS
SOURCE: ENR
0502_Top500_Overview.indd 46 4/26/22 6:33 PM
JACOBS has been selected by the
Markets’ Share of
Total Revenue
25.3%
BUILDING
$27,134.0
24.7%
TRANSPORTATION
$26,467.9
$ MILLIONS
9.0%
HAZARDOUS
8.9%
WASTE
$9,620.8
POWER
7.1%
$9,583.0
5.8% 6.7% WATER
SEWER PETROLEUM $7,614.5
5.0% AND WASTE $7,150.2
2.2%
INDUSTRIAL $6,210.8
MANUFACTURING 2.9% $5,359.9
$2,326.4 2.4% OTHER
TELECOM $3,099.8
$2,540.0
PROFESSIONAL (MEASURED IN
PROFESSIONAL 300 INCREASE 50 FIRMS REPORTING)
DOMESTICtheir profit margins last year, and gross rev- INTERNATIONAL
465
increased 8
STAFF HIRING 56
enue rose 11.1%, on average.
DECREASE PERCENT SHARE OF TOTAL REVENUE
STAFF HIRING
92 costs, firms are finding
Faced with rising inflation
STAYED THE SAME BY OWNER TYPE
23 SOURCE: ENR
team committed to serving clients to help them meet 70.1% STATE/LOCAL 24.7%
TRANSPORTATION
their goals,” says Kevin McNutt, director of engineer- of firms report 37.9% $26,467.9
ing at BSA LifeStructures. A team must be “open and revenue rose
flexible to the unexpected along the way,” he adds. between 2020
$ MILLIONS
How firms go about creating these teams seems to PRIVATE
and 2021.
be as diverse as the firms themselves. 48% 9.0%
HAZARDOUS
Data-Driven Decisions $39.6 8.9%
POWER $9,620.8
WASTE
As part of scaling up the breadth of its design services, million: median 7.1% cyber and data-management technologies for clients
$9,583.0
5.8% 6.7% WATER
Jacobs says the company is thinking far “beyond tra- SEWER revenue
across all of its design markets.
among$7,614.5
PETROLEUM
ditional scope,
2.2%
schedule and budget” to meet
5.0% demands
AND WASTEarchitecture
$7,150.2 “This move recognizes the significant progress
INDUSTRIAL $6,210.8
of the market and changing client
MANUFACTURING 2.9% needs. The
$5,359.9
firm has firms. we’ve made,” says Steve Arnette, president of its Crit-
held the$2,326.4
No. 1 position
2.4% on theOTHER
Top 500 list since 2018. ical Mission Solutions unit.
TELECOM $3,099.8
On March 3, Jacobs
$2,540.0
announced the creation of a “More than that,” Arnette adds, “it acknowledges
new data solutions accelerator that will integrate cloud, the importance of embracing disruption and innova-
PROFESSIONAL (MEASURED IN
PROFESSIONAL 300 INCREASE 50 FIRMS REPORTING)
DOMESTIC INTERNATIONAL
STAFF HIRING 56 DECREASE STAFF HIRING 8
92 STAYED THE SAME 23 SOURCE: ENR
tion to drive solutions horizontally across the company tech to develop data centers around the world,” he
and create value for our clients.” says. “Our data center, architecture, engineering and
For Burns & McDonnell, moving company opera- construction teams have grown significantly to meet
tions to cloud-based platforms has allowed for better these needs.”
resilience, availability, cost management and security, To help the firm better calculate operational and
says chairman and CEO Ray Kowalik. “Our clients financial risks long before shovels hit the dirt, Kiewit
continue to move toward more integrated delivery Corp. has also rolled out major investments in data
technology, says vice president and operations control-
ler Dave Freeman.
“We’ve placed greater emphasis on capturing the
NUMBER“There
OF FIRMS is a positive
right data to drive better analysis and operational im-
TOTAL
VOLUME REVENUE
provements,”
NUMBER OF FIRMS
he says.
DOMESTIC
PROFITS shift
REPORTING in the company
PROFITABILITY to $107.1
REPORTING
In addition to changes to the company’s overall data
ensure data of all types
$ BILLIONS
416 SIZE OF BACKLOG
management processes and structure, Kiewit has added
is treated as a core,
DOMESTIC
REVENUE data stewards for “monitoring data use to ensure
HIGHER
356 ac-
crucial
INTERNATIONAL
asset.” $89.2
countability,” Freeman points out.
PROFITS
Dave “There is a positive shift in the company to ensure
76 Freeman, VP, operations controller, Kiewit
INTERNATIONAL
data of all types is treated as a core, crucial asset to
REVENUE
DOMESTIC INTERNATIONAL $17.9 better estimate our work at the right price, build work
LOSSES LOSSES
10 3 at the lowest cost, and manage our SAME
people and assets,”
models,” he says. “They are increasingly wanting one Freeman adds. 64
entity to handle their project safely, on schedule and LOWER
on budget,” Kowalik says, which makes protection of Putting Technology34 to Work
client data even more paramount. In the last several years, Hargrove Engineers + Con-
“Cloud computing has been an area of explosive structors has made what it says are significant invest-
growth, and we are working with the biggest names in ments in its in-house laser-scanning team, with numer-
COMPARING THE
PAST DECADE’S
DESIGN REVENUE $
90.24 $
92.69 $
92.31 $
91.81 $
92.84 $
93.90 $
101.16 $
103.24 $
104.77 107.11
$
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
$ BILLIONS
SOURCE: ENR
ous technologies, including drones, laser scanners, shooting, optimizing real-time process controls, and
ground-penetrating radar and electromagnetic detec- predictive maintenance,” says Hargrove. “Expected
tion systems. Team members receive Federal Aviation client benefits include increased throughput and qual-
Authority certification to operate drones. ity, lower operating costs and increased equipment
“This equipment can maximize the data collected uptime.”
and minimize the number of trips to client facilities,” Barr Engineering says the company is continually
says President and CEO Ralph A. Hargrove. “This learning by experimenting with technology applica-
team is also able to incorporate [virtual reality] ele- tions, including integrating 3D scan data with simula-
ments to our client-facing materials in the design tion and augmented reality. The firm recently acquired
phases of a project, making communication clearer and an augmented reality platform that allows it to view
more precise.” and interact with GIS and 3D designs overlayed on
Additionally, Hargrove finds more clients are ex- real-world data and imagery.
pecting digital-twin technology and process modeling “We’ve been piloting the platform for the past few
packaged as value-added services. “Examples of ser- months and will be using it for an upcoming client
vices offered include equipment analysis and trouble- project,” says Ward Swanson, president and CEO.
KCI Technologies (No. 48) is providing construction management and inspection services on the replacement of the Governor Harry W. Nice
Memorial/Senator Thomas ‘Mac’ Middleton Bridge over the Potomac River between Maryland and Virginia. Built north of the existing bridge,
the new structure will double available lanes from two to four, and enable tall ships to pass beneath. Upon completion of the new bridge, the
existing structure will be demolished and materials will be used to create an artificial fish reef in the Chesapeake Bay watershed.
#268
on the
#32
on the
Top 500 List Top 500 List
We encourage staff to propose initiatives in support of When you are reasonably satisfied with your
continual improvement. Going back 12 years, a group of retention numbers, this is the time to double down.
women started a Women of CO employee group to Don’t get complacent. Talk to your current
provide mentorship and professional advancement employees, do a company-wide survey, find out
among our female staff. We’re more than 50% female. what is important and work on it.
#10
on the
#261
on the
Top 500 List Top 500 List
We are seeing a definitive uptick in business with Because of how inclusive it is, once funding starts, it will
localities and regional and state agencies, all of be imperative that we are staffed appropriately to meet
which are exhibiting confidence in their infrastruc- the needs of our clients. We foresee a bit of a juggling
ture programs and asking for increasing assistance act—achieving parity where tactical utilization offsets
in delivering them. anticipatory preparation.
In the areas of AI and data science, the firm is de- Adding DEI to Design Services
veloping what it refers to as a “Data Science Pipeline” As much as COVID-19 has put a focus on digital in-
to streamline its ability to perform advanced analysis novation, firms are also finding themselves having
on project data. deeper discussions with clients about long-term design
“We’ve seen a large increase in the size of data packages that help cut carbon emissions, execute ESG
we are collecting, recently moving from billions of goals and meet diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI)
markers for stakeholders.
Steinberg Hart President and CEO David Hart says
the firm’s focus on DEI has been its biggest success.
“We understand that our “I think it’s the path to even greater successes for
our firm in the future,” says Hart. “We’re having real
work has lasting impacts conversations with our clients and actively pursuing
on people's lives, so the ways to improve processes and outcomes on our proj-
center ensures every WSP ects. It’s a long-term plan.
project integrates equity.” “This has always been something we strived for, but
the pandemic really pushed us to the next level,” he adds.
Lou Cornell, CEO, WSP
Recognizing how infrastructure spending could
transform communities and leave others behind, WSP
USA recently formed the Equity Center of Excellence
records to a project requiring us to collect over a to “drive the transformation of infrastructure to full
trillion records during the lifetime of the project,” and equitable access for underserved, marginalized and
says Swanson, explaining that he foresees projects disinvested communities,” says CEO Lou Cornell.
evolving to “require a deeper understanding of Equity has become a measure of progress tied to
what normally occurs through typical data analysis many infrastructure developments as a vital lifeline for
and visualization.” communities, he notes.
52 ENR May 2/9, 2022 enr.com
“We understand that our work has lasting impacts Hurd. “While services and experience are a key aspect
on people’s lives, so the center ensures that every of selecting BKF, we are seeing more owners inter-
WSP project integrates equity into its processes, from ested in our culture and how we incorporate DEI into
planning to resourcing to implementation and use,” our design philosophy.”
Cornell explains. Design firms that are engineering diversity, equity and
Clients measuring a design firm’s culture, values inclusion philosophy into projects is another way they
and DEI programs against their own quickly are be- can add more to their scope of services with minimal risk,
coming the norm, says Greg Hurd, president and says Huckabee CEO Christopher M. Huckabee.
CEO of BKF Engineers. “For many clients, we are developing COVID-19
“When selecting consultants, owners are seem- market impact statements that are tailored to their
ingly more interested in working with firms that am- community and based on research and our experi-
plify diversity and align with their own cultures and ence,” says Huckabee.
values, rather than the portfolio of our services,” says In the education market, Huckabee helps clients
communicate with stakeholders on project impacts.
It’s an opportunity for the firm to provide wrap-
around services, such as communication strategy, but
“We are seeing more also serve as a voice in the industry, says Huckabee.
owners interested in our More than a project consultant, clients are looking
culture and how we for a partner that will help them navigate the fluctu-
incoporate DEI into our ating construction market, he says.
“Huckabee works with our educational partners
design philosophy.” to develop strategies that involve prototype design,
Greg Hurd, President and CEO, early design packages pre-bond, shorter duration in
BKF Engineers between bonds and different construction delivery
methods,” says Huckabee.
54 ENR May 2/9, 2022 enr.com
THE TOP 500 DESIGN FIRMS #16 Mario Azar as the company’s new
chairman and CEO, succeeding Steve
Edwards, who retires after 44 years.
#398
on the
#338
on the
Top 500 List Top 500 List
We have ventured into the energy market, specifically Conventional transportation, bridge, transit, civil and facilities
natural gas, because all of this rapid development with storage capacity and residential work are proving to be hot
needs new utilities and relocations, including gas. This markets due to an influx of consumer and infrastructure
has been very lucrative for us, and we have seen 25% spending. We are expanding our portfolio to include private
revenue gains year after year for the last five years. sector work to supplement our public infrastructure work.
#383
on the
#130
on the
Top 500 List Top 500 List
To accelerate our organization’s digital transformation Besides accelerating our ability to truly work
over the last two years, we have focused on collecting anywhere, we feel increased cross-company
pertinent data to drive business decisions, proactively communications during the pandemic have only
automate strategy and better position the organization improved our ability to connect efficiently and
to increase positive business outcomes. effectively with each other and our clients.
THE TOP 500 DESIGN FIRMS #57 Nations Global Compact, the world’s
largest corporate sustainability
initiative.
sitions as part of an expansion program implemented gies. The company recently entered the transporta-
in 2017. On the tion design services market as a result of its acquisi-
“We set out to build and grow a culture-focused Web tions, he adds.
firm with the driving philosophy centered around At CMTA, recent mergers and acquisitions have
providing opportunities for our employees and ex- enabled the company to implement significant geo-
ceptional service to our clients,” says CEO Ernesto graphical expansion. The company became a port-
Aguilar. “This foundation has guided us in expand- For expanded folio firm for equity investor Blackstone in 2021.
content on
ing existing services and territories, as well as pen- “Within our family of companies, we can now
ENR’s Top
etrating new markets and geographies.” Lists, see ENR. help our clients create and raise funds for projects,
Ardurra’s strategic plan sets goals for acquisitive com/toplists. provide them with high performance-based engi-
growth at 20% and organic growth at about 15% neering design, and provide solutions to design,
per year, says Aguilar, and tactics to achieve goals build, lease, operate and guarantee performance,
must align with its market share expansion strate- including systems installation and construction man-
enr.com May 2/9, 2022 ENR 63
Universal Engineering Sciences (No. 42) was part of the team that placed 5,000 cu yd of 8,000-psi concrete into what will be the center pier
of the Miami Signature Bridge. The pour took 33 hours, and featured 1.7 million lb of rebar. The center pier will be the principle foundation for
the bridge’s six arches, the tallest of which is 330 ft. The bridge is part of the broader I-395/SR836/I-95 project. More than 30 acres of
community space will be created under the bridge when completed.
agement,” explains Tony Hands, electrical engineer being local —understanding local dynamics to get
and vice president. work done effectively,” the group says. The group
Outside of ENR’s Top 10, other factors are con- defines ENR firms 11-100 as large and firms 101-
tributing to a growth in market share for firms. 500 as midsized. Firms not on the Top 500 list are
A study group of industry veterans from Gerry defined as small.
Salontai of Verdantas, Rod Hoffman of Smith Hoff- They add that the largest firms also may be turn-
man Consulting, Colvin Matheson of Matheson Fi- ing their attention to larger, programmatic contracts
nancial Partners and Paul Chinowsky, professor of “that generate revenue over a period of years rather
civil engineering at the University of Colorado, than months.” The group also sees the largest firms
PHOTO COURTESY OF UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES
Boulder, has been tracking the trend over the last focusing their efforts outside of the U.S., as well as
four years, using data from the ENR Top 500, the moving towards a more “transactional and econom-
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Sector Eco- ically driven approach.”
nomic Statistics and interviews with over 150 C-
suite executives. People as a Priority
“What we have found through interviews is that A major part of the IIJA is navigating its stipulations
the very large/large and mid-sized are preferred by for funding. The moment Congress passed the act,
clients due to being part of their community and many firms found a need for scaling up their staffing
64 ENR May 2/9, 2022 enr.com
market category and rounding. NA-Not available. Power comprises thermal and hydroelectric power
How To Read the Tables
PHOTOS COURTESY OF VIRGINIA TECH (LEFT) AND WAIA THINK TANK (RIGHT)
General Building as a category includes commercial plants, waste-to-energy plants, transmission lines,
KEY TO TYPE OF FIRM buildings, offices, stores, educational facilities, government substations, cogeneration plants, etc.
A architect, E engineer, EC engineer-contractor, buildings, hospitals, medical facilities, hotels, apartments, Sewerage / Solid Waste includes sanitary and storm
AE architect-engineer, EA engineer-architect, ENV housing, etc. sewers, treatment plants, pumping plants, incinerators,
environmental, GE geotechnical engineer, L landscape Hazardous Waste includes chemical and nuclear waste industrial waste facilities, etc.
architect, P planner and O other. Other combinations are treatment, asbestos and lead abatement, etc. Telecommunications comprises transmission lines and
possible. Firms classified themselves.
Industrial Process comprises pulp and paper mills, steel cabling, towers and antennae, data centers, etc.
Companies are ranked according to revenue for mills, nonferrous metal refineries, pharmaceutical plants, Transportation includes airports, bridges, roads, canals,
design services performed in 2021 in $ millions (*). chemical plants, food and other processing plants, etc. locks, dredging, marine facilities, piers, railroads,
Those with subsidiaries are indicated by (†). For
Manufacturing includes auto, electronic assembly, tunnels, etc.
information on subsidiaries and where each firm
worked outside of the U.S., see www.enr.com. textile plants, etc. Water Supply includes dams, reservoirs, transmission
**Firms not ranked last year. Some markets may not add Petroleum includes refineries, petrochemical plants, pipelines, distribution mains, irrigation canals, desalination
up to 100% due to omission of “other” miscellaneous offshore facilities, pipelines, etc. and potability treatment plants, pumping stations, etc.
TE
G
LEU
ILDIN
WA S
G
ATIO
TE
RIN
TRO
LY
WA S
UPP
L BU
CTU
OUS
O RT
/ PE
M
ER S
ER /
UFA
ARD
ERA
NSP
ECO
ER
US.
RANK FIRM 2021 REVENUE $ MIL.
MAN
POW
SEW
WAT
GEN
HAZ
TRA
TEL
IND
2022 2021 FIRM TYPE TOTAL INT’L
TE
G
LEU
ILDIN
WA S
G
ATIO
TE
RIN
TRO
LY
WA S
UPP
L BU
CTU
OUS
O RT
/ PE
M
ER S
ER /
UFA
ARD
ERA
NSP
ECO
ER
US.
RANK FIRM 2021 REVENUE $ MIL.
MAN
POW
SEW
WAT
GEN
HAZ
TRA
TEL
IND
2022 2021 FIRM TYPE TOTAL INT’L
TE
G
LEU
ILDIN
WA S
G
ATIO
TE
RIN
TRO
LY
WA S
UPP
L BU
CTU
OUS
O RT
/ PE
M
ER S
ER /
UFA
ARD
ERA
NSP
ECO
ER
US.
RANK FIRM 2021 REVENUE $ MIL.
MAN
POW
SEW
WAT
GEN
HAZ
TRA
TEL
IND
2022 2021 FIRM TYPE TOTAL INT’L
101 96 CIVIL & ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS INC., Pittsburgh, Pa. E 196.3 0.0 28 0 7 3 18 22 1 17 0
102 106 GARVER, North Little Rock, Ark. E 195.8 0.0 6 0 0 13 21 0 58 0 0
103 98 SAM LLC, Austin, Texas † E 195.0 0.0 6 0 38 3 1 19 30 0 3
104 104 FREESE AND NICHOLS INC., Fort Worth, Texas E 195.0 0.0 3 0 0 37 36 2 15 0 0
105 116 BGE INC., Houston, Texas E 190.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 16 0 22 0 0
106 110 BARR ENGINEERING CO., Minneapolis, Minn. E 187.4 15.5 0 4 19 17 0 11 2 18 0
107 100 POPULOUS, Kansas City, Mo. A 186.4 67.3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
108 114 BRAUN INTERTEC CORP., Minneapolis, Minn. † GE 184.5 0.0 41 0 4 3 1 23 25 0 0
109 122 WESTWOOD PROFESSIONAL SERVICES, Minneapolis, Minn. E 177.8 0.0 36 0 56 3 1 0 4 0 0
110 130 HALEY & ALDRICH INC., Burlington, Mass. † E 176.8 0.0 23 0 5 0 0 0 12 60 0
111 79 KOHN PEDERSEN FOX ASSOCIATES PC, New York, N.Y. A 176.2 129.7 99 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
112 107 WHITMAN REQUARDT AND ASSOCIATES LLP, Baltimore, Md. EA 175.7 0.0 23 0 0 10 7 0 57 0 2
113 113 MERRICK & CO., Greenwood Village, Colo. † EA 175.3 10.9 31 42 8 8 0 1 1 0 0
114 190 ARDURRA GROUP INC., Tampa, Fla. † E 172.7 0.0 8 0 0 34 32 0 25 0 0
115 115 WISS JANNEY ELSTNER ASSOCIATES, Northbrook, Ill. EA 172.5 7.7 78 0 1 1 0 2 14 0 0
116 94 HGA, Minneapolis, Minn. AE 172.0 1.5 96 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0
117 131 PAPE-DAWSON ENGINEERS INC., San Antonio, Texas E 170.8 0.0 72 4 0 7 2 0 13 0 0
118 144 BOWMAN CONSULTING GROUP, Reston, Va. E 170.1 0.0 42 0 13 7 6 10 14 0 6
119 121 AFFILIATED ENGINEERS INC., Madison, Wis. E 165.6 1.3 76 2 13 0 0 7 0 0 3
120 124 S&ME INC., Raleigh, N.C. E 163.8 0.0 34 3 14 3 1 12 29 1 1
121 135 TOWER ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS, Raleigh, N.C. E 156.9 12.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100
122 127 SSOE GROUP, Toledo, Ohio EA 156.2 14.9 16 54 3 0 0 28 0 0 0
123 111 PBK, Houston, Texas AE 155.2 0.0
100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
124 139 ULTEIG ENGINEERS INC., Fargo, N.D. † E 152.9 2.5 0 0 85 0 1 0 12 0 0
125 128 H.W. LOCHNER INC., Chicago, Ill. E 151.7 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0
126 125 SWCA ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS, Phoenix, Ariz. ENV 151.5 0.0 8 0 51 5 1 20 6 1 0
127 129 SIMPSON GUMPERTZ & HEGER, Waltham, Mass. E 151.4 12.4 70 2 7 3 1 3 13 0 0
128 134 MORRISON HERSHFIELD, Atlanta, Ga. † EA 151.3 106.3 32 0 1 2 4 0 35 0 25
129 140 HENDERSON ENGINEERS INC., Lenexa, Kan. † E 149.4 0.0 99 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
130 126 GZA, Norwood, Mass. † ENV 149.3 0.0 28 16 7 9 1 5 10 10 0
131 142 WESTON & SAMPSON, Reading, Mass. † E 146.4 0.0 0 0 5 24 33 2 11 9 0
132 150 BOLTON & MENK INC., Mankato, Minn. † E 144.8 0.0 14 0 0 9 10 0 32 0 0
133 120 EA ENGINEERING SCIENCE AND TECH. INC., Hunt Valley, Md. ENV 144.7 0.0 0 0 8 8 18 15 6 45 0
134 157 AMERICAN STRUCTUREPOINT, Indianapolis, Ind. EA 144.4 0.0 21 5 0 6 9 0 57 0 2
135 163 LABELLA ASSOCIATES DPC, Rochester, N.Y. † EA 143.8 2.3 14 0 8 13 25 6 10 24 0
136 141 NORR, Chicago, Ill. † AE 142.4 76.2 94 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0
137 151 TIMMONS GROUP, Richmond, Va. E 135.5 0.0 64 2 15 2 3 0 11 0 2
138 143 MESA ASSOCIATES INC., Madison, Ala. E 135.0 0.0 0 0 96 0 0 4 0 0 0
139 133 SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON INC. (SEH), St. Paul, Minn. EA 134.8 0.0 25 0 0 8 11 0 55 0 0
140 138 PARAMETRIX, Seattle, Wash. E 134.7 0.0 6 0 0 8 12 1 64 1 4
141 137 DLZ CORP., Columbus, Ohio † EA 134.2 12.6 16 1 11 12 15 9 33 2 0
142 165 FLAD ARCHITECTS, Madison, Wis. † AE 132.8 0.0
100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
143 156 QUIDDITY ENGINEERING, Bellaire, Texas E 132.5 0.0 49 0 0 10 17 0 16 0 0
144 136 PSOMAS, Culver City, Calif. E 129.8 0.0 27 0 1 12 7 6 44 2 0
145 146 GAI CONSULTANTS INC., Homestead, Pa. † E 129.3 0.0 11 0 50 2 1 2 33 1 0
146 215 CONGRUEX , Boulder, Colo. † E 129.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100
147 132 WALTER P MOORE, Houston, Texas E 127.1 3.3 72 0 0 7 2 0 20 0 0
148 145 EYP ARCHITECTURE & ENGINEERING, Albany, N.Y. AE 126.5 0.0 98 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
149 168 ELECTRICAL CONSULTANTS INC., Billings, Mont. † E 125.4 0.0 0 0 90 0 0 1 0 0 0
150 160 HARDESTY & HANOVER LLC, New York, N.Y. E 124.8 1.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0
TE
G
LEU
ILDIN
WA S
G
ATIO
TE
RIN
TRO
LY
WA S
UPP
L BU
CTU
OUS
O RT
/ PE
M
ER S
ER /
UFA
ARD
ERA
NSP
ECO
ER
US.
RANK FIRM 2021 REVENUE $ MIL.
MAN
POW
SEW
WAT
GEN
HAZ
TRA
TEL
IND
2022 2021 FIRM TYPE TOTAL INT’L
TE
G
LEU
ILDIN
WA S
G
ATIO
TE
RIN
TRO
LY
WA S
UPP
L BU
CTU
OUS
O RT
/ PE
M
ER S
ER /
UFA
ARD
ERA
NSP
ECO
ER
US.
RANK FIRM 2021 REVENUE $ MIL.
MAN
POW
SEW
WAT
GEN
HAZ
TRA
TEL
IND
2022 2021 FIRM TYPE TOTAL INT’L
TE
G
LEU
ILDIN
WA S
G
ATIO
TE
RIN
TRO
LY
WA S
UPP
L BU
CTU
OUS
O RT
/ PE
M
ER S
ER /
UFA
ARD
ERA
NSP
ECO
ER
US.
RANK FIRM 2021 REVENUE $ MIL.
MAN
POW
SEW
WAT
GEN
HAZ
TRA
TEL
IND
2022 2021 FIRM TYPE TOTAL INT’L
TE
G
LEU
ILDIN
WA S
G
ATIO
TE
RIN
TRO
LY
WA S
UPP
L BU
CTU
OUS
O RT
/ PE
M
ER S
ER /
UFA
ARD
ERA
NSP
ECO
ER
US.
RANK FIRM 2021 REVENUE $ MIL.
MAN
POW
SEW
WAT
GEN
HAZ
TRA
TEL
IND
2022 2021 FIRM TYPE TOTAL INT’L
TE
G
LEU
ILDIN
WA S
G
ATIO
TE
RIN
TRO
LY
WA S
UPP
L BU
CTU
OUS
O RT
/ PE
M
ER S
ER /
UFA
ARD
ERA
NSP
ECO
ER
US.
RANK FIRM 2021 REVENUE $ MIL.
MAN
POW
SEW
WAT
GEN
HAZ
TRA
TEL
IND
2022 2021 FIRM TYPE TOTAL INT’L
351 351 PBS ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL INC., Portland, Ore. E 45.4 0.0 33 4 2 3 8 1 22 24 0
352 326 I. C. THOMASSON ASSOCIATES INC., Nashville, Tenn. † E 45.2 0.0 75 1 6 1 0 13 3 0 0
353 354 BSA LIFESTRUCTURES, Indianapolis, Ind. AE 45.1 0.0
100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
354 334 MCLAREN ENGINEERING GROUP, Woodcliff Lake, N.J. E 44.8 0.0 40 0 5 0 0 0 55 0 0
355 350 SUNRISE ENGINEERING INC., Fillmore, Utah E 44.8 0.0 23 0 1 22 8 20 14 0 0
356 357 KAPUR & ASSOCIATES INC., Milwaukee, Wis. E 44.7 0.0 6 0 35 1 1 4 51 1 0
357 295 LMN ARCHITECTS, Seattle, Wash. A 44.7 0.0 96 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0
358 332 THE BECK GROUP, Dallas, Texas A 44.5 1.7 98 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0
359 408 NILES BOLTON ASSOCIATES, Atlanta, Ga. A 44.2 0.0
100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
360 360 HERBERT ROWLAND & GRUBIC INC., Harrisburg, Pa. E 43.7 0.0 19 0 0 17 21 0 24 0 0
361 368 M&S ENGINEERING LLC, Spring Branch, Texas E 43.5 0.0 5 0 85 5 0 0 5 0 0
362 362 BOHANNAN HUSTON INC., Albuquerque, N.M. E 43.4 0.0 19 10 0 12 11 0 24 0 0
363 367 STEINBERG HART, Los Angeles, Calif. A 43.3 0.0
100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
364 239 EXYTE AMERICAS HOLDING INC., Plano, Texas † EC 43.2 0.0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
365 ** STELLAR, Jacksonville, Fla. E 43.1 4.8 6 0 0 0 0 94 0 0 0
366 442 THE VERTEX COS. INC., Weymouth, Mass. † E 42.8 0.0 41 5 5 0 0 10 30 10 0
367 359 HUBBELL ROTH & CLARK INC., Bloomfield Hills, Mich. EA 42.8 0.0 4 0 1 14 26 6 46 0 0
368 340 FFKR ARCHITECTS, Salt Lake City, Utah A 42.5 0.0
100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
369 366 GRAEF, Milwaukee, Wis. EA 42.2 0.0 40 12 1 6 8 5 28 0 0
370 263 V3 COS., Woodridge, Ill. † E 42.2 2.7 42 0 17 5 0 0 33 0 0
371 344 LIONAKIS, Sacramento, Calif. AE 41.9 0.0
100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
372 393 BWBR, Saint Paul, Minn. A 41.6 0.0 91 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
373 355 HOUSTON ENGINEERING INC., Fargo, N.D. E 41.3 0.0 0 0 0 8 4 0 14 0 0
374 371 BOSWELL ENGINEERING INC., South Hackensack, N.J. E 41.3 0.0 4 0 20 4 5 0 65 2 0
375 342 KIRKSEY ARCHITECTS INC., Houston, Texas A 40.5 0.0 90 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10
376 356 TAIT, Santa Ana, Calif. EA 40.4 0.0 56 0 6 0 1 8 8 2 18
377 413 PRIMERA ENGINEERS LTD., Chicago, Ill. EA 40.3 0.0 13 0 60 0 0 0 27 0 0
378 363 RDG PLANNING & DESIGN, Des Moines, Iowa A 40.0 0.0 92 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
379 392 KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES, Clovis, Calif. E 39.7 0.0 61 3 4 5 1 4 13 6 3
380 374 LANDRUM & BROWN INC., Cincinnati, Ohio † O 39.7 14.3 2 0 0 0 0 0 98 0 0
381 ** SGA, Boston, Mass. † A 39.6 0.0
100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
382 390 THE LIRO GROUP, Syosset, N.Y. † EA 39.5 0.0 50 0 0 0 0 0 19 13 17
383 463 MILHOUSE ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION INC., Chicago, Ill. † EC 39.5 0.0 30 0 34 0 1 0 29 0 5
384 372 RRC POWER & ENERGY LLC, Round Rock, Texas O 39.4 0.0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0
385 349 TPG ARCHITECTURE LLP, New York, N.Y. A 39.0 3.5
100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
386 410 LEIGHTON GROUP INC., Irvine, Calif. † GE 39.0 0.0 62 0 0 8 0 3 23 3 3
387 427 MATRIX TECHNOLOGIES INC., Maumee, Ohio EA 38.9 0.0 0 84 0 0 0 16 0 0 0
388 373 FENTRESS ARCHITECTS, Denver, Colo. A 38.9 0.0 48 0 0 0 0 0 52 0 0
389 395 ZYSCOVICH ARCHITECTS, Miami, Fla. A 38.8 0.0 94 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0
390 ** GALLOWAY & CO. INC., Greenwood Village, Colo. EA 38.8 0.0
100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
391 379 MAZZETTI, San Francisco, Calif. E 38.7 0.0 15 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 2
392 388 MACGREGOR ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS INC., Atlanta, Ga. A 38.6 0.0
100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
393 ** WALLACE DESIGN COLLECTIVE, Tulsa, Okla. E 38.6 0.0 91 0 0 0 3 6 0 0 0
394 430 SANBORN HEAD & ASSOCIATES INC., Concord, N.H. E 38.5 6.2 34 0 9 0 22 0 0 36 0
395 439 SHEEHAN NAGLE HARTRAY ARCHITECTS LTD., Chicago, Ill. † A 38.4 8.1 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 89
396 407 TREANORHL, Lawrence, Kan. A 38.2 0.0 73 0 0 0 0 7 2 0 0
397 383 CTL ENGINEERING INC., Columbus, Ohio † EA 37.9 0.0 40 5 4 6 3 3 38 0 1
398 396 WK DICKSON & CO. INC., Charlotte, N.C. E 37.9 0.0 0 0 0 20 24 10 29 0 0
399 414 JLG ARCHITECTS, Minneapolis, Minn. A 37.5 0.0
100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
400 412 THE OSBORN ENGINEERING CO., Cleveland, Ohio † EA 37.2 0.0 41 7 3 6 11 7 17 0 9
TE
G
LEU
ILDIN
WA S
G
ATIO
TE
RIN
TRO
LY
WA S
UPP
L BU
CTU
OUS
O RT
/ PE
M
ER S
ER /
UFA
ARD
ERA
NSP
ECO
ER
US.
RANK FIRM 2021 REVENUE $ MIL.
MAN
POW
SEW
WAT
GEN
HAZ
TRA
TEL
IND
2022 2021 FIRM TYPE TOTAL INT’L
401 ** BRIDGEFARMER & ASSOCIATES INC., Dallas, Texas E 37.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0
402 428 JCJ ARCHITECTURE, Hartford, Conn. A 36.6 0.0
100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
403 394 NEWCOMB & BOYD, Atlanta, Ga. E 36.6 0.0 85 1 0 0 0 0 6 0 7
404 397 GFF INC., Dallas, Texas A 36.6 0.0
100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
405 433 CRAFTON TULL, Rogers, Ark. EA 36.5 0.0 39 2 1 1 5 11 23 0 0
406 448 VOCON, Cleveland, Ohio A 36.3 0.0
100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
407 320 LOCHMUELLER GROUP INC., Evansville, Ind. † E 36.3 0.0 0 0 0 0 26 0 64 0 0
408 464 SEPI, Raleigh, N.C. E 36.0 0.0 18 0 0 0 0 0 82 0 0
409 ** FSB ARCHITECTS + ENGINEERS, Oklahoma City, Okla. AE 36.0 0.0
100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
410 456 PLUMMER ASSOCIATES INC., Fort Worth, Texas E 35.9 0.0 0 0 0 48 41 0 0 0 11
411 404 RJN GROUP INC., Wheaton, Ill. E 35.9 0.0 0 0 0 4 96 0 0 0 0
412 361 CPH INC., Sanford, Fla. EA 35.8 1.3 34 0 0 15 23 0 10 0 0
413 ** ROWE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CO., Flint, Mich. E 35.6 0.0 0 0 0 3 3 14 61 0 0
414 435 KENDALL/HEATON ASSOCIATES INC., Houston, Texas A 35.5 0.0
100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
415 424 MCCLURE ENGINEERING, Clive, Iowa E 35.5 0.0 34 0 0 17 9 0 25 0 0
416 386 DEKKER/PERICH/SABATINI LTD., Albuquerque, N.M. AE 35.5 0.0
100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
417 421 CTL|THOMPSON INC., Centennial, Colo. † E 35.4 0.0 25 3 0 1 0 0 4 0 0
418 402 KS ENGINEERS PC, Newark, N.J. E 35.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0
419 378 D&B ENGINEERS AND ARCHITECTS DPC, Woodbury, N.Y. EA 34.9 0.0 0 0 0 33 44 0 9 14 0
420 365 BHDP ARCHITECTURE, Cincinnati, Ohio A 34.8 0.0 81 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
421 451 HIGHLAND ASSOCIATES, New York, N.Y. AE 34.6 0.0 30 3 0 0 0 9 0 0 47
422 465 MBH ARCHITECTS, Alameda, Calif. A 33.9 4.6
100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
423 453 JONES EDMUNDS & ASSOCIATES INC., Gainesville, Fla. † E 33.7 0.0 5 0 0 23 44 0 22 0 0
424 420 WENDEL, Williamsville, N.Y. † AE 33.5 0.0 39 1 0 3 6 0 10 0 0
425 418 REBEL DESIGN+GROUP, Marina Del Rey, Calif. † A 33.2 16.5 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
426 459 MG ENGINEERING DPC, New York, N.Y. E 33.1 0.0
100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
427 445 DAHLIN GROUP ARCHITECTURE PLANNING, Pleasanton, Calif. A 33.1 0.0
100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
428 479 THERMALTECH ENGINEERING INC., Cincinnati, Ohio E 33.0 0.0 6 63 0 0 0 31 0 0 0
429 398 WHITNEY BAILEY COX & MAGNANI LLC, Baltimore, Md. EA 32.9 0.0 26 0 0 2 0 3 68 0 0
430 ** POWERS BROWN ARCHITECTURE, Houston, Texas A 32.9 1.3 63 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
431 385 ERDMAN ANTHONY, Rochester, N.Y. E 32.9 0.0 21 0 0 11 0 0 68 0 0
432 ** LJB INC., Miamisburg, Ohio EA 32.8 0.0 30 3 0 5 0 9 23 0 0
433 409 GROUP 70 INTERNATIONAL INC. DBA G70, Honolulu, Hawaii O 32.8 1.5
100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
434 438 KAHLER SLATER, Milwaukee, Wis. A 32.6 0.0
100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
435 425 RRMM ARCHITECTS, Chesapeake, Va. A 32.4 0.0
100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
436 458 DONOHUE & ASSOCIATES INC., Sheboygan, Wis. E 32.1 0.0 0 0 0 21 79 0 0 0 0
437 470 TOWERPINKSTER, Kalamazoo, Mich. AE 32.1 0.0 97 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0
438 ** THE GATEWAY ENGINEERS INC., Pittsburgh, Pa. † E 32.0 0.0 35 0 0 6 19 26 3 0 0
439 450 TRAFFIC PLANNING AND DESIGN INC., Pottstown, Pa. E 31.8 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0
440 415 GBBN, Cincinnati, Ohio A 31.8 3.7
100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
441 454 MCMAHON ASSOCIATES INC., Neenah, Wis. † AE 31.5 0.0 16 10 1 11 48 3 10 0 0
442 307 DAY & ZIMMERMANN, Philadelphia, Pa. † AE 31.4 14.3 84 4 0 0 0 0 1 0 11
443 469 THE EADS GROUP INC., Altoona, Pa. EA 31.4 0.0 5 0 0 12 22 22 25 0 0
444 461 DATTNER ARCHITECTS, New York, N.Y. A 31.3 0.0 93 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0
445 496 ARRAY ARCHITECTS, Conshohocken, Pa. A 31.3 0.0
100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
446 487 LORING CONSULTING ENGINEERS INC., New York, N.Y. E 31.3 1.3 74 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
447 403 INTEGRUS ARCHITECTURE PS, Spokane, Wash. AE 31.2 0.0
100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
448 434 RDC-S111, Long Beach, Calif. A 31.2 0.0
100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
449 480 RTM ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS LLC, Schaumburg, Ill. E 31.1 0.0 86 5 0 0 0 5 0 0 5
450 490 DUNHAM ASSOCIATES, Minneapolis, Minn. E 31.1 0.0
100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TE
G
LEU
ILDIN
WA S
G
ATIO
TE
RIN
TRO
LY
WA S
UPP
L BU
CTU
OUS
O RT
/ PE
M
ER S
ER /
UFA
ARD
ERA
NSP
ECO
ER
US.
RANK FIRM 2021 REVENUE $ MIL.
MAN
POW
SEW
WAT
GEN
HAZ
TRA
TEL
IND
2022 2021 FIRM TYPE TOTAL INT’L
A CDG Inc.
CDI Engineering Solutions
461
255
EnSafe Inc.
EUA (Eppstein Uhen Architects Inc.)
243
266
Hazen and Sawyer
HBK Engineering LLC
54
166
AECOM2 CDM Smith 23 Erdman Anthony 431 HDR5
Affiliated Engineers Inc. 119 CESO Inc. 234 ESG Architecture & Design 470 HEAPY346
AHL484 CHA Consulting Inc. (CHA) 61 ESP Associates Inc. 258 Henderson Engineers Inc. 129
AI Engineers Inc. 338 Civil & Environmental Consultants Inc. 101 David Evans Enterprises Inc. 99 Herbert Rowland & Grubic Inc. 360
AKF Group 283 Clark Nexsen 202 EwingCole194 HGA116
AKRF Inc. 244 CMTA Inc. 177 EXP26 Highland Associates 421
AlfaTech Consulting Engineers Inc. 276 CO Architects 268 Exyte Americas Holding Inc. 364 Hillis-Carnes Engineering Associates Inc. 329
Alliiance451 Cobb Fendley & Associates Inc. 184 EYP Architecture & Engineering 148 HKS43
American Structurepoint 134 Coffman Engineers Inc. 157 HLW304
Anvil Corp. 254 Colliers Engineering & Design 85 F HMC Architects 208
Arcadis North America/Callison RTKL 14 Collins Engineers Inc. 308 HNTB Cos. 11
Farnsworth Group Inc. 220
AO Architects 192 Congruex 146 HOK41
Francis Cauffman Architects 483
Ardurra Group Inc. 114 CONSOR Engineers 76 Hord Coplan Macht 217
Fehr & Peers 264
ARM Group Enterprises Inc. 350 Cooper Carry 233 Houston Engineering Inc. 373
Fehr Graham - Engineering & Environmental 494
Arora Engineers Inc. 487 Core States Group 230 Hubbell Roth & Clark Inc. 367
Fentress Architects 388
Array Architects 445 Corgan94 Huckabee212
FFKR Architects 368
Arup38 COWI North America 198 Huitt-Zollars Inc. 160
FGM Architects Inc. 454
ATCS PLC 345 CPH Inc. 412 Humphreys & Partners Architects 305
Fishbeck190
Atwell LLC 81 CPL256 Hunt Guillot & Associates LLC 309
Flad Architects 142
Ayers Saint Gross 311 Crafton Tull 405 Hussey Gay Bell 486
Fluor3
Ayres318 Crawford Murphy & Tilly Inc. 219
CRB67
Foth68
I
B CSO469
FSB Architects + Engineers
Freese and Nichols Inc.
409
104 IBI Group Inc. 39
Cushing Terrell 218
Michael Baker International 28 French & Parrello Associates 464 IMEG Corp. 71
CTL Engineering Inc. 397
Bala Consulting Engineers 344 Fugro USA 66 Infrastructure Consulting & Engineering PLLC 216
CTL|Thompson Inc. 417
Ballinger235 Fuss & O’Neill Inc. 328 Integral Group 199
CUBE 3 482
Barge Design Solutions 171 FXCollaborative480 Integrus Architecture PS 447
Cuningham274
Barr Engineering Co. 106 Intertek-PSI22
Barry-Wehmiller Design Group 90
D G IPS-Integrated Project Services LLC 89
Bartlett & West Inc. 295 ISG250
Group 70 International Inc. dba G70 433
Barton & Loguidice DPC 285 D&B Engineers and Architects DPC 419
Baxter & Woodman Inc. 267 D’Amato Conversano Inc. dba DCI Engineers 307
GAI Consultants Inc.
Galloway & Co. Inc.
145
390 J
BCC Engineering Inc. 215 Dahlin Group Architecture Planning 427
Gannett Fleming 29 J-U-B Engineers Inc. 240
Beam Longest & Neff 154 LEO A DALY 168 Garver102 Jacobs1
Bechtel25 DE Corp. 339 The Gateway Engineers Inc. 438 Jaros Baum & Bolles 263
The Beck Group 358 Dattner Architects 444 GBA (George Butler Associates) 293 JCJ Architecture 402
Alfred Benesch & Co. 100 Davis Partnership Architects 337 GBBN440 Jensen Hughes 80
BETA Group Inc. 463 Day & Zimmermann 442 GEI Consultants Inc. 93 JLG Architects 399
BGE Inc. 105 DCCM174 Genesis AEC 248 Johnson Mirmiran & Thompson Inc. (JMT) 60
BHDP Architecture 420 Degenkolb Engineers 321 Gensler13 Jones Edmunds & Associates Inc. 423
BKF Engineers 156 Dekker/Perich/Sabatini Ltd. 416 Geo-Logic Associates Inc. 253 Jordan & Skala Engineers 349
BL Cos. Inc. 155 Dennis Group 180 Geocon326
Black & Veatch
Bohannan Huston Inc.
16
362
DeSimone Consulting Engineers
Devcon Construction Inc.
296
495
GeoEngineers Inc.
Geosyntec Consultants
222
40
K
Bolton & Menk Inc. 132 Dewberry36 GFF Inc. 404 Kahler Slater 434
Borton-Lawson466 DGA planning | architecture | interiors 196 Ghafari Associates LLC 153 Kapur & Associates Inc. 356
Boswell Engineering Inc. 374 WK Dickson & Co. Inc. 398 GHD Inc. 27 KCI Technologies Inc. 48
Bowman Consulting Group 118 DLR Group 72 GMB Architecture + Engineering 462 Kendall/Heaton Associates Inc. 414
Braun Intertec Corp. 108 DLZ Corp. 141 Goodwyn Mills and Cawood Inc. 193 Kennedy/Jenks Consultants Inc. 223
Bridgefarmer & Associates Inc. 401 Dokken Engineering 468 GPD Group 152 Kier & Wright 327
Brown and Caldwell 37 Donohue & Associates Inc. 436 GRAEF369 Kiewit Corp. 18
BRPH Cos. Inc. 257 DOWL204 Greeley and Hansen 201 Kimley-Horn10
BSA LifeStructures 353 Draper Aden Associates Inc. 315 HR Green Inc. 162 Kirksey Architects Inc. 375
BSC Group 496 DRMP Inc. 228 Greenman-Pedersen Inc. (GPI) 70 Kisinger Campo & Associates Corp. 299
BSI Engineering 314 Dunham Associates 450 Gresham Smith 84 Kleinfelder45
Building & Earth Sciences Inc. 474 GZA130 KLJ207
Burgess & Niple Inc. 205 E Kohn Pedersen Fox Associates PC 111
The Burke Group Ltd. 163
E4H Environments for Health Architecture 282
H KPFF Consulting Engineers 86
Burns & McDonnell 8 Krazan & Associates 379
EA Engineering Science and Tech. Inc. 133 H2M architects + engineers 209
Burns Engineering Inc. 241 KS Engineers PC 418
The EADS Group Inc. 443 Haley & Aldrich Inc. 110
Burrow Global LLC 298 KSA Engineers Inc. 459
Engineering Consulting Services (ECS) 64 Halff Associates Inc. 97
BWBR372 KTGY Architecture + Planning 185
Environmental Design and Research (EDR) 478 Hanson Professional Services Inc. 169
KZF Design 467
C Electrical Consultants Inc. 149 Hardesty & Hanover LLC 150
15 Parsons Corp.
3 Fluor Parsons Environment & Infrastructure
Fluor Constructors International Inc. Parsons Government Services
Fluor Enterprises Inc. Parsons Transportation
12 Worley
Advisian
1
2022 Top 500 Design Firms – Subsidiaries by Rank
58 EN Engineering LLC
48 KCI Technologies Inc. CNA LLC
KCI Communications Infrastructure ESC Engineering
KCI Environmental Technologies and Energy Initiatives Group LLC
Construction G2 Integrated Solutions LLC
Kestrel Power Engineering LLC
Kestrel Power Engineering Ltd
49 RS&H Inc.
QC Data LLC
RS&H Architects-Engineers-Planners, Inc.
Spectrum Engineering LLC
RS&H Commercial Realty, Inc.
Texas Utility Engineering LLC
RS&H Michigan, Inc.
59 SCS Engineers
51 Woolpert Inc.
SCS Energy
AAM
SCS Engineers
CivilTech Engineering
SCS Field Services
Data Cloud Solutions
Jviation
Optimal Geo 60 Johnson Mirmiran & Thompson Inc.
Southern Mapping Company JMT of New York, Inc
Woolpert Canada Vaughn & Melton
eTrac
81 Atwell LLC
RVi Planning and Landscape Architecture
6
2022 Top 500 Design Firms – Subsidiaries by Rank
7
2022 Top 500 Design Firms – Subsidiaries by Rank
8
2022 Top 500 Design Firms – Subsidiaries by Rank
9
2022 Top 500 Design Firms – Subsidiaries by Rank
12
2022 Top 500 Design Firms – Subsidiaries by Rank
382 The LiRo Group 423 Jones Edmunds & Associates Inc.
DiGiorgio Associates, Inc JEACES
James LaSala & Associates, LLP
LiRo Architects + Planners, PC
LiRo Engineers, Inc 424 Wendel
LiRo GIS, Inc Wendel Architectural Resources, Inc.
LiRo Program and Construction Management Wendel Construction, Inc.
PE, PC Wendel Consulting Services, LLC
Wendel Energy Services, LLC
Wendel Engineering Resources, Inc.
383 Milhouse Engineering & Wendel Engineering, PC
Construction Inc. Wendel WD Architecture, Engineering,
Surveying & Landscape Architecture, PC
Milhouse Construction
Milhouse Snow
425 Rebel Design+Group
386 Leighton Group Inc. REBEL BRANDING
REBEL MEDIA
Leighton Consulting, Inc.
REBEL PROCUR
Leighton and Associates, Inc.
395 Sheehan Nagle Hartray Architects 438 The Gateway Engineers Inc.
Gateway Engineers
Sheehan Nagle Hartray Associates, Limited
13
2022 Top 500 Design Firms – Subsidiaries by Rank
481 SB Architects
SB Architects
14
Where the 2022 Top 500 Design Firms Worked
1
Where the 2022 Top 500 Design Firms Worked
2
Where the 2022 Top 500 Design Firms Worked
3
Where the 2022 Top 500 Design Firms Worked
4
Where the 2022 Top 500 Design Firms Worked
5
Where the 2022 Top 500 Design Firms Worked
6
Where the 2022 Top 500 Design Firms Worked
7
Where the 2022 Top 500 Design Firms Worked
8
Where the 2022 Top 500 Design Firms Worked
9
Where the 2022 Top 500 Design Firms Worked
10
Where the 2022 Top 500 Design Firms Worked
11
Where the 2022 Top 500 Design Firms Worked
12
Where the 2022 Top 500 Design Firms Worked
13
Where the 2022 Top 500 Design Firms Worked
14
Where the 2022 Top 500 Design Firms Worked
15
Where the 2022 Top 500 Design Firms Worked
16
Where the 2022 Top 500 Design Firms Worked
17
Where the 2022 Top 500 Design Firms Worked
18
Where the 2022 Top 500 Design Firms Worked
19
Where the 2022 Top 500 Design Firms Worked
20
Where the 2022 Top 500 Design Firms Worked
21
Where the 2022 Top 500 Design Firms Worked
22
Where the 2022 Top 500 Design Firms Worked
23
Where the 2022 Top 500 Design Firms Worked
24
Where the 2022 Top 500 Design Firms Worked
25
Where the 2022 Top 500 Design Firms Worked
26
Where the 2022 Top 500 Design Firms Worked
Malaysia Nepal
AO Architects CDM Smith
Arcadis North America/Callison RTKL Jensen Hughes
Black & Veatch LANGAN
Corgan Magnusson Klemencic Associates
Fluor Otak Inc.
Gensler Simpson Gumpertz & Heger
Geosyntec Consultants
HDR Philippines
HOK AO Architects
Haskell Arcadis North America/Callison RTKL
Jacobs Black & Veatch
Jensen Hughes Burns & McDonnell
Kohn Pedersen Fox Associates PC Fluor
LANGAN Gensler
Landrum & Brown Inc. Ghafari Associates LLC
MBH Architects HOK
Moody Nolan Haskell
NV5 Global Inc. Jacobs
Newcomb & Boyd Jensen Hughes
Perkins Eastman KPFF Consulting Engineers
Sargent & Lundy LANGAN
Sasaki Landrum & Brown Inc.
Skidmore Owings & Merrill Leidos
T.Y. Lin International Magnusson Klemencic Associates
TRC Cos. Inc. Moffatt & Nichol
Thornton Tomasetti Populous
WATG Ross & Baruzzini Inc.
27
Where the 2022 Top 500 Design Firms Worked
28
Where the 2022 Top 500 Design Firms Worked
Tajikistan Vietnam
Sasaki Arcadis North America/Callison RTKL
Bechtel
Thailand
Black & Veatch
AO Architects CDM Smith
BRPH Cos. Inc. Cardno Inc.
Bechtel Day & Zimmermann
Black & Veatch EYP Architecture & Engineering
CHA Consulting Inc. (CHA) Gensler
Fluor HOK
Gensler Jensen Hughes
HOK KPFF Consulting Engineers
Hart Howerton Kohn Pedersen Fox Associates PC
Jacobs LANGAN
Jensen Hughes MBH Architects
KPFF Consulting Engineers Moffatt & Nichol
Kohn Pedersen Fox Associates PC Page
LANGAN Perkins Eastman
Leidos SB Architects
MBH Architects Sasaki
Moffatt & Nichol Skidmore Owings & Merrill
Moody Nolan T.Y. Lin International
Page TRC Cos. Inc.
Perkins Eastman Thornton Tomasetti
Populous WATG
Rebel Design+Group
Simpson Gumpertz & Heger
Skidmore Owings & Merrill G. AUSTRALIA/OCEANIA
Stanley Consultants
TRC Cos. Inc. Australia
Thornton Tomasetti Arcadis North America/Callison RTKL
WATG BRPH Cos. Inc.
Bechtel
29
Where the 2022 Top 500 Design Firms Worked
30
Where the 2022 Top 500 Design Firms Worked
Algeria Libya
Arcadis North America/Callison RTKL Perkins Eastman
HOK
Perkins Eastman Morocco
Arcadis North America/Callison RTKL
Egypt Barr Engineering Co.
Ayers Saint Gross Black & Veatch
Bechtel Day & Zimmermann
Black & Veatch Gensler
Burns & McDonnell HKS
CDM Smith IPS-Integrated Project Services LLC
Fluor Jacobs
Gensler Jensen Hughes
HKS LANGAN
HOK Magnusson Klemencic Associates
Jacobs Moffatt & Nichol
Jensen Hughes Perkins Eastman
LANGAN Rebel Design+Group
Magnusson Klemencic Associates STUDIOS architecture
NORR Sargent & Lundy
Parsons Corp. Tetra Tech Inc.
Perkins Eastman Thornton Tomasetti
Perkins&Will WATG
SB Architects Wiss Janney Elstner Associates
Sargent & Lundy Worley
Sasaki
31
Where the 2022 Top 500 Design Firms Worked
32
Where the 2022 Top 500 Design Firms Worked
33
Where the 2022 Top 500 Design Firms Worked
34