Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Autocrats Versus Activists in

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 16

The Rise of Kleptocracy

Autocrats versus Activists


in Africa
Brett L. Carter

Brett L. Carter is assistant professor in the School of International Re-


lations at the University of Southern California. His essay “The Strug-
gle over Term Limits in Africa: How International Pressure Can Help”
appeared in the July 2016 issue of the Journal of Democracy.

The Central African region is experiencing a crisis greater than any


since the “third wave” of democratization reached Africa nearly three
decades ago. In the Republic of Congo, President Denis Sassou-Ngues-
so confronts a debt-to-GDP ratio approaching 120 percent and a hu-
manitarian crisis in Pool, the region that lies around Brazzaville, the
national capital. In Gabon, President Ali Ben Bongo faces a domestic
opposition that refuses to accept the fraudulent August 2016 presidential
election, as well as a diaspora that has been shining a spotlight on his
government’s violence in the election’s wake. In Cameroon, President
Paul Biya’s violent response to calls for political reform in the English-
speaking region of the country is fostering demands for secession. In
Chad, President Idriss Déby has suspended elections until further notice,
rousing the ire of civil society groups. In the Democratic Republic of
Congo (DRC), President Joseph Kabila has set an election for December
2018, with pressure building on him to step down rather than run for a
third term. And in the small West African country of Togo, President
Faure Gnassingbé confronts an opposition newly energized by massive
protests that swept the nation in August and September 2017.
The falling world price of oil (a commodity on whose export the re-
gion heavily depends), clear violations of democratic norms, and the
positive example provided by neighbors such as the Gambia, where a
dictator was peacefully turned out of power in early 2017, have all played
a role in driving events. In order fully to grasp what is happening, how-
ever, one must understand how the struggle for political reform is being
waged across the region.
This essay makes three central points. First, as Western governments

Journal of Democracy Volume 29, Number 1 January 2018


© 2018 National Endowment for Democracy and Johns Hopkins University Press
Brett L. Carter 55

have become more willing over the years to impose sanctions in response
to human-rights abuses, the region’s autocrats are anxious to inoculate
themselves from Western pressure. They do so, in part, by using their
financial resources to compel policy makers abroad to ignore persistent
human-rights abuses. Second, citizens and diaspora communities are re-
sponding by turning to international judicial institutions to apply pressure
on Central Africa’s autocrats. Third, these autocrats have responded by
fine-tuning the tools of modern autocracy. These include professional “im-
age-laundering” campaigns, an attempt to remove Africa from the juris-
diction of the International Criminal Court (ICC), and recourse to private
financial institutions that enable more sophisticated money laundering.
Today, many of Africa’s autocrats have enough disposable income
(even after paying for domestic quiescence) to create powerful constitu-
encies abroad. These constituencies, in turn, have vested financial inter-
ests in the survival of autocratic regimes. Scholars have long sought to
understand how external forces—often international creditors, but also
transnational NGOs using “name-and-shame” campaigns—constrain the
domestic autonomy of the world’s autocrats. As Central Africa’s autocrats
attempt to loosen those constraints, citizens and diaspora communities
have turned to international courts in hopes of imposing new constraints.
The struggle over political reform in Central Africa has gone global.
The origins of massive, state-sanctioned corruption in Central Af-
rica lie about a half-century ago, in the years following decolonization.
French president Charles de Gaulle, eager to rebuild an economy that
had been devastated by World War II, sought to give France a major
energy industry. To do this, he created a pair of companies, one of which
would focus on the Middle East and North Africa while the other dealt
with sub-Saharan Africa. That second company, Essence et Lubrifiants
de France (or Elf) was “under full state control to support [de Gaulle’s]
African policies. Elf was . . . a parallel diplomacy to control certain
African states, above all at the key moment of decolonization. Opaque
operations were organized to keep certain countries stable.”1
The system’s centerpiece was Gabon. This tiny, thinly populated
country located where the Equator meets Africa’s west coast was one
of the continent’s first major oil producers. Until 1960, it had been a
French colony. The arrangement was simple: When Omar Bongo be-
came president in 1967, he sold Gabon’s crude oil to Elf at well below
market prices, and then transferred a share of oil revenue from Gabonese
coffers back to France to fund Gaullist election campaigns.2 In return,
the French government made Bongo one of the richest men in the world.
For every barrel of crude oil that Gabon sold to Elf, the company re-
ceived 57 percent of the proceeds, the Gabonese state treasury received
25 percent, and Bongo himself received 18 percent.3
These proceeds paid for, among other things, a vast portfolio of
French real estate that included at least 33 properties, with three man-
56 Journal of Democracy

sions in Paris alone and a villa on the Riviera.4 Underpinning the system
were the French Intercontinental Bank (FIBA), created in 1975 to make
paying African presidents easier, and a French military base in Libre-
ville that featured a tunnel linking it to Bongo’s presidential palace.5
The system was created by the French right, but the left soon joined.
President François Mitterrand of the Socialist Party (PS), elected in
1981 after 25 years of Gaullist rule, vowed a new era of transparency.
Bongo responded with a threat: “Do you want me to give my oil to the
Americans?”6 Mitterrand relented, leaving the Elf system intact. Soon
Central Africa’s autocrats were sluicing campaign funds to the PS as
well as the Gaullists. “Am I of the right, the left, or the center?” Bongo
once mused. “No, I have friends everywhere.”7 Before he died in 2009,
Bongo had effectively captured the entire French political class.
This system persists. In 2011, Robert Bourgi revealed that he had been
the bagman linking former French president Jacques Chirac and his lieu-
tenant, former premier Dominique de Villepin, with Central Africa’s au-
tocrats. Between 1997 and 2005, Bourgi claimed, he had delivered some
US$20 million, roughly half of which had gone to Chirac’s 2002 reelection
campaign. “There was never less than 5 million francs,” but the amount
per suitcase “could go up to 15 million.”8 Jean-François Probst, another
Chirac aide, later said that Nicolas Sarkozy continued the practice during
his own presidency (2007–12), reportedly receiving a billion CFA (Central
African) francs from Bongo in 2007.9 In July 2015, Sarkozy reportedly
collected about 100,000 euros for giving a single speech in Brazzaville.10
Allegations of financial improprieties plagued the campaign period
leading up to the 2017 French presidential election. Prime Minister Manuel
Valls was the frontrunner for the Socialist nomination until March 2016,
when the French press revealed that Denis Sassou-Nguesso had been fund-
ing a chamber orchestra run by Valls’s wife. Jean-Yves Ollivier, suspected
of trafficking illicit diamonds in Central Africa,11 was the reported money
conduit; in 2015, Valls made Ollivier a member of the French Legion of
Honor.12 In March 2017, Marine Le Pen of the right-wing National Front
(FN) visited Chad’s President Idriss Déby just weeks before the election.
The trip’s timing—as well as Le Pen’s remarks—raised suspicions. By
her own account, she told Déby that she was a “defender of state sover-
eignty.”13 In Central Africa, “sovereignty” has become code for letting au-
tocrats do what they want domestically without concern for human rights.
Many observers regarded Le Pen’s comment as a fundraising pitch.
In 2011, Bourgi was quite clear about what Central Africa’s autocrats
received for their campaign contributions: “France would close its eyes
to certain excesses of power in Africa.”14 This was evident in October
2015, when French president François Hollande (like Mitterrand, a So-
cialist) lent his support to Sassou-Nguesso’s efforts to hold a constitu-
tional referendum designed to let him to stay in office for a third term.15
Central Africa’s autocrats have exploited their financial resources to cap-
Brett L. Carter 57

ture politicians elsewhere. In 2014, Sassou-Nguesso’s government owed


Brazil $280 million,16 implying a debt-service burden high enough to con-
strain the Congolese president’s ability to buy domestic support. Eager for
relief, Sassou-Nguesso’s government seems to have relied on procurement
contracts that it had been extending to Asperbras, a Brazilian firm with
close ties to former presidents Luiz Inácio “Lula” da Silva and Dilma Rous-
seff. Sassou-Nguesso’s debt-relief bill, wrote reporter José Casado, passed
the Brazilian Congress “in record time and without debate in the Senate.”17
Sassou-Nguesso had been giving such contracts to Asperbras since 2012.
That year, the company began work on the Maloukou Industrial and Com-
mercial Zone, a project worth $500 million. It also won a $200 million con-
tract from Sassou-Nguesso’s government for “geological mapping and min-
ing prospecting.” In 2013, Asperbras was contracted to drill four-thousand
wells across the Republic of Congo. In 2014, the French weekly Le Canard
Enchaîné reported that these well-drilling contracts cost Congo five to seven
times more than comparable work in the (much drier) Sahel. To support these
cost-inflated projects, the company created Asperbras Congo, a subsidiary that
was fronted by a sports agent and convicted tax evader named José Veiga.18
On two other occasions, Sassou-Nguesso has sought to secure debt
relief by influencing policy makers abroad. In 2004, his country had the
world’s highest per capita debt, so he sought relief from the IMF and
World Bank under their Heavily Indebted Poor Countries (HIPC) initia-
tive. Between 2006 and 2010, Sassou-Nguesso allowed quarterly audits
of the state oil company and fired his son, Denis Christel, as head of oil
marketing. The president also reportedly persuaded the IMF’s country di-
rector for Congo, Yaya Moussa, who oversaw debt-relief talks until 2009,
to falsify oil-revenue data.19 In 2011, two years after Moussa resigned and
a year after debt relief was granted, he resurfaced as founder and CEO of
Kontinent LLC, which markets Congolese oil. In 2013, Moussa became
a director of the Banque Africaine pour l’Industrie et Commerce (BAIC).
His fellow directors included Veiga and Jean-Philippe Amvame Ndong,
the head of another known Sassou-Nguesso front company.20
Currently, Sassou-Nguesso is facing yet another financial crisis. Al-
though Congo’s debt was forgiven in 2010, by mid-2017 the country’s
debt-to-GDP ratio had risen to roughly 120 percent, well above the 77
percent that Sassou-Nguesso had acknowledged during a March 2017 IMF
visit.21 As of April 2017, Congo was also technically in default to major
oil traders.22 Out of cash and again in need of IMF help, Sassou-Nguesso
engaged Dominique Strauss-Kahn, the French Socialist politician who had
once been France’s finance minister and later headed the IMF.23
Central Africa’s autocrats also routinely try to influence U.S. poli-
cy makers, often by hiring Washington, D.C., lobbyists. The Foreign
Agents’ Registration Act (FARA) requires foreign agents to disclose
their activities on behalf of foreign governments: every dollar they re-
ceive, every call they make or email they send, every meeting they ar-
58 Journal of Democracy

range, and every political campaign to which they contribute. As a re-


sult, there is a great deal of data about foreign influence in D.C.
The FARA-mandated lobbying disclosures show that Sassou-Ngues-
so turns to lobbyists when he faces political crises at home.24 The first of
these came in 1990, as he was losing power. There was another around
Congo’s 2002 presidential election, and then came his government’s
debt troubles and resulting campaign for HIPC relief between 2006 and
2010. One of this campaign’s major goals was to render Congolese af-
fairs as opaque as possible to “vulture funds”—private-equity firms that
buy distressed sovereign debt in secondary markets, then sue govern-
ments to pay it back. Such funds use private investigators to uncover
corruption as a strategy to make defaulting governments more likely
to pay up. By uncovering evidence of Sassou-Nguesso’s massive graft,
these private-equity firms jeopardized his campaign for debt relief.
In 2008 alone—at the midpoint of his campaign—Sassou-Nguesso spent
nearly $4 million to advance his debt-relief bid. He hired four lobbying
firms: the Livingston Group, Trout Cacheris, Chlopak Leonard Schechter
and Associates (now known as CLS Strategies), and the Loeffler Group. Ac-
cording to the Sunlight Foundation, lobbyists for Congo “met with members
of Congress, their staff, and executive branch officials about 1500 times.”25
The lobbying effort helped to secure the June 2009 reintroduction in Con-
gress of a bill, the “Stop VULTURE Funds Act” (H.R. 2932).26 This bill,
in its own words, vowed to prevent equity firms from “speculating in and
profiteering from defaulted sovereign debt at the expense of both the impov-
erished citizens of the poor nations and the taxpayers of the world who have
participated in international debt relief.” Put less pejoratively, the bill would
have deprived U.S. citizens of the ability to seek debt repayment in courts.
Sassou-Nguesso’s lobbyists never secured passage of the bill. Yet the
effort cost the Congolese autocrat little. The nearly $4 million he spent in
2008 represented a mere fraction of the amount of oil revenue that went
missing from the Congolese treasury each year during the early 2000s.27

The Diasporas Weigh In


Reflecting the magnitude of the ongoing challenges that autocrats face,
the list of political prisoners in Central Africa is growing. In Congo, Sas-
sou-Nguesso’s two chief opponents in the March 2016 presidential elec-
tion remain in prison, as do several prominent journalists. In Cameroon,
Biya imprisoned dozens of English-speaking activists. In 2017, Gabonese
security services used tear gas against students, teachers, oil-company
employees, and opposition activists, and they jailed dozens of citizens.
As state repression has made domestic opposition costlier, Central
Africans living outside the region have become central to the struggle
for political reform. The Gabonese diaspora in Paris has been protesting
every Saturday since 3 September 2016, just after the 27 August 2016
Brett L. Carter 59

presidential-election results were announced and President Ali Bongo


(Omar Bongo’s son) launched an assault on opposition headquarters in
a bid to crush citizens’ protests over obvious electoral fraud. The Gabo-
nese diaspora also protests visits by Bongo aides to Paris and New York,
hoping to draw attention to human-rights violations. The Congolese di-
aspora in Paris, led by Andréa Ngombet’s SassouFit Collective—Sas-
souFit is a phonetic play on ça suffit (“that’s enough”)—launched a so-
cial-media campaign to block the IMF bailout in 2017. In Washington,
a diaspora group called the Cameroon American Council has worked
with members of Congress to request a State Department inquiry into
whether U.S. support for the Biya government violates the Leahy Law,
which prohibits military aid to known human-rights violators.
These campaigns have shifted the balance of power between Central
Africa’s autocrats and their citizens. Again, the Gabonese diaspora has
been prominent. Their weekly protests in Paris attracted the attention of
the European Parliament. Led by Jo Leinen, a member from Germany, the
European Parliament has passed resolutions calling for “consultations”
under the Cotonou Agreement, an accord between the EU and developing
countries passed in 2000 that in part “aims to safeguard and promote hu-
man rights, democratic principles and the rule of law . . . through political
dialogue.” The European Council last invoked the Cotonou Agreement
in December 2015 in response to state repression in Burundi; Brussels
cut financial aid to President Pierre Nkurunziza’s government just four
months later. Leinen has called for eventual sanctions against Bongo and
senior regime officials. “Ali Bongo is not a legitimate president, and . . .
it’s unacceptable for us to do nothing.”28
Over the past decade, diaspora activists have opted to take the fight
for reform to institutions far harder for autocrats to control: foreign
courts of law. Their efforts began in March 2007, when Paris-based
NGOs filed a criminal complaint against five then-presidents: Bongo
and Sassou-Nguesso, plus Burkina Faso’s Blaise Compaoré, Equatorial
Guinea’s Teodoro Obiang, and Angola’s José Eduardo dos Santos. The
complaint alleged that their assets in France were grossly incompatible
with their official salaries, and hence must have been obtained with
laundered money. Known as the biens mal acquis (ill-gotten gains) af-
fair, it soon focused on Bongo, Obiang, and Sassou-Nguesso.
All three have tried repeatedly to block the proceedings. Each has pri-
vately petitioned successive French presidents, all of whom demurred in
the face of media attention. In June 2017, French prosecutors brought
President Obiang’s son Teodorin to trial. The verdict was announced on 27
October 2017. It was three years in jail and a fine of 30 million euros, both
suspended, and so they will only be enforced if Teodorin is found to have
reoffended. French prosecutors will likely turn next to the Sassou-Nguesso
family. Several of the latter’s relatives—including a nephew and a daugh-
ter—have already been indicted and a range of assets seized.29
60 Journal of Democracy

Legal proceedings adverse to the autocrats and those close to them


have also taken place in the United States, Canada, Italy, Portugal, and
Switzerland. In late 2016, presidential nephew Wilfrid Nguesso was
barred from Canadian residency after the Federal Court of Canada ruled
that he likely belonged to a “criminal organization.”30 Earlier that year, in
June, First Lady Antoinette Sassou-Nguesso was served with a subpoena
in Washington, compelling her to give a deposition in the Commisimpex
affair, a legal dispute over an unpaid government debt from the 1980s. In
2015, two U.S. federal courts had ruled that the Sassou-Nguesso govern-
ment owes Commisimpex more than $1 billion. Sassou-Nguesso’s finance
minister was served with a subpoena related to the case in October 2016. 31
Foreign nationals who launder money for Central Africa’s autocrats
have also been taken to court. In February 2016, Portuguese authorities
arrested José Veiga of Asperbras Congo and charged him with money
laundering. In July 2016, José Mauricio Caldeira, Asperbras’s finance
director, was arrested in Argentina and extradited to Portugal.32 In No-
vember 2016, Roberto Colnaghi, Asperbras’s CEO, was arrested in
Portugal for public corruption.33 In January 2017, Philippe Chironi was
convicted of laundering some 83 million euros between 2006 and 2011
on behalf of the Sassou-Nguesso family via San Marino’s Banque Com-
merciale.34 Most recently, in September 2017, the U.S. government an-
nounced that it planned to file charges against Joseph Szlavik, Bongo’s
lobbyist, as part of a longstanding money-laundering probe.35
The French judicial system is now prosecuting Central African autocrats
for activities that the French political class long fostered. With these and
other high-profile court cases, media scrutiny has made the autocrats vir-
tual pariahs in Europe and North America and rendered them more vulner-
able to international sanctions. Collecting aid and debt relief has become
harder for these autocrats. So has making allies among other African heads
of state, who help to chart African Union (AU) policy and occasionally
rubber-stamp obviously fraudulent elections. In response, Central Africa’s
autocrats have begun investing heavily in propaganda beyond their own
nations’ borders in hopes of laundering their damaged personal reputations.
Again, Sassou-Nguesso is a leader. The weekly Forbes Afrique has
emerged as a mainstay publication for Africa’s emerging upper middle
class, especially its technology entrepreneurs. The magazine is also
among Sassou-Nguesso’s chief political instruments. Founded in 2011
by Lucien Ebata, who has been implicated in Sassou-Nguesso’s money-
laundering apparatus,36 Forbes Afrique has been exceptionally kind to
Sassou-Nguesso. Its first issue led with this: “Congo-Brazzaville: The
New Era. . . . [Since 1997, Sassou Nguesso] has worked tirelessly to
bring back hope for life to 3.5 million compatriots.”37
Forbes Afrique routinely holds conferences in Brazzaville that are
briefly attended by leading French politicians in exchange for honoraria
as high as 100,000 euros.38 Forbes Afrique is not alone, and perhaps
Brett L. Carter 61

not even the most influential. In 2016, the multilingual news service
Euronews expanded to the African continent via its subsidiary, Afri-
canews. A partner was needed, and Sassou-Nguesso eagerly sought the
role, promising to build the service a headquarters in Brazzaville.39
Like Forbes Afrique, Africanews provides favorable coverage to Sas-
sou-Nguesso, if only by omission: It has been virtually silent about the
atrocities that Sassou-Nguesso’s military has committed in the Pool region
since April 2016.40 Other Central African autocrats control major pan-Af-
rican news outlets. Biya and Obiang, for instance, jointly own Africa 24.
Jeune Afrique, the most prominent current-affairs magazine in
French-speaking Africa, has long had a reputation for selling favorable
political coverage to Central African autocrats. The magazine carefully
guards its finances, but in 2005 a leaked document revealed which gov-
ernments pay for positive coverage. The list included Bongo, Obiang,
and Rwandan President Paul Kagame.41 Sassou-Nguesso maintains a
close relationship with Jeune Afrique as well. The wife of its editorial
director, François Soudan, is a longtime friend and, since 2015, has been
Sassou-Nguesso’s tourism minister. Jeune Afrique routinely publishes
puff pieces, such as this headline from June 2017: “How Denis Sassou
Nguesso Became a Notable [Village Elder] at 10 Years Old.”42
Sassou-Nguesso also has ties to the most influential French daily
newspapers. His domestic-propaganda apparatus is operated by Jean-
Paul Pigasse, a Frenchman who in 2002 was implicated in Sassou-
Nguesso’s money-laundering operation.43 Pigasse ostensibly owns the
company that publishes Les Dép^eches de Brazzaville, Sassou-Nguesso’s
propaganda newspaper. Pigasse’s nephew is Matthieu Pigasse, the bank-
er who purchased two of France’s leading newspapers, Le Monde and Le
Nouvel Observateur, in 2013. Some in Central Africa suspect that part
of the capital for the purchase may have come from Congo.44
Paid lobbyists are a key part of African autocrats’ image-laundering
campaigns. In October 2015, with the 2016 presidential election less than
a year away, Bongo signed a $1.38 million lobbying contract with the
Atlanta-based Bryan Cave law firm to burnish his reputation.45 One of
Bongo’s favorite tactics has been to depict himself before Western audi-
ences as a champion of conservationism and environmental protections.
In 2009, Obiang hired the D.C.-based Qorvis Communications/MSL-
Group to conduct an extensive public-relations campaign. For a $60,000
monthly retainer, Qorvis issued press releases trumpeting Obiang’s eco-
nomic and human-rights records, and staged interviews with Obiang
lieutenants that it then posted on YouTube as if they were legitimate
news programs. In one, a Qorvis employee asks Equatorial Guinea’s
ambassador to the United States what advice he would give other Af-
rican countries about how to foster democracy and economic growth.46
Paid advocates for Central African dictators have drawn at least one
trusted D.C. think tank, the Atlantic Council, into their image-laundering
62 Journal of Democracy

efforts. Two of Bongo’s frequent advocates—Madison Avenue public-re-


lations operative Richard Attias and D.C. lobbyist Joseph Szlavik—have
also been donors to the Atlantic Council. In 2015, according to the Coun-
cil’s own annual report for that year (which lists donations in ranges),
the total that the two (taken together) gave was not less than $55,000 and
could have been as high as $109,998.47 In 2016, the Council nominated
Bongo for its “Global Citizen Award,” a shocking move given his impli-
cation in the biens mal acquis affair and his government’s widespread
reputation as one of the most corrupt in Africa. (In fact, he could not
attend the Council’s New York awards gala owing to the strife that had
broken out in his capital following the fraudulent 2016 presidential elec-
tion.) The Council later claimed that it had “received no contribution from
any corporate or individual funder with investments or interests in Gabon
in relationship to this award nomination or any work we do on Gabon.”48
It is hard to see how that statement can be squared with the donations
that the Atlantic Council has taken from Szlavik, a registered Bongo lob-
byist, and Attias, who has been paid by the Bongo government to orga-
nize a PR event in Libreville. The Atlantic Council has been implicated
in other image-laundering campaigns as well. In 2012, the Council held a
conference that the New Republic described as “essentially a love poem”
to the authoritarian president of Kazakhstan, Nursultan Nazarbayev.49 And
in June 2016, Bronwyn Bruton, the deputy director of the Council’s Africa
Center, wrote a New York Times column in which she acknowledged the
“frightful” human-rights situation in Eritrea, but knocked a UN report on
abuses in the country as “shoddy.”50 Bruton’s article did not include a dis-
closure that the Atlantic Council accepts money from Nevsun Resources,
the Canadian mining firm implicated in Eritrea’s forced-labor scandal.51
To go with their reputation laundering, Central Africa’s autocrats
have also sought to weaken international legal institutions that might
pose a threat to them. The main target has been the ICC. However
flawed it may be, there is strong evidence that the ICC has constrained
human-rights violations in Africa. The ICC is also currently investigat-
ing the Bongo government for its attack on opposition headquarters fol-
lowing the August 2016 presidential election. The autocrats would love
to withdraw their countries from the ICC, but doing so (or even talking
about doing so) would seal their international-pariah status.
What to do, then? The autocrats’ preferred workaround was to try
to get the African Union as a whole to pull out of the ICC all at once.
A unified withdrawal, the autocrats calculated, would let them take
cover behind Africa’s democracies. The autocrats prepared the ground
as best they could, striving to create the impression that African citi-
zens were demanding withdrawal. In November 2016, Sassou-Nguesso
even staged a youth march in Brazzaville, which Jeune Afrique and Af-
ricanews dutifully reported.52 In January 2017, a vote on the matter was
taken in closed session at the AU’s summit in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Brett L. Carter 63

But there was no agreement on anything beyond a nonbinding call to


withdraw from the ICC, which left the autocrats with their underlying
problem unsolved.53 The ICC and its jurisdiction remain threats.

Be the Bank
Central Africa’s dictators have a long history as players in banking,
dating from Elf’s creation of the FIBA bank more than four decades
ago. In recent years, the autocrats’ engagement in international finance
seems to have grown. In 2000, amid a French public-corruption scan-
dal involving Elf, FIBA was effectively rebranded as the Gabonese and
French International Bank (BGFI). Its senior leadership remained the
same. In Brazzaville, BGFI even occupied the same building as the de-
funct FIBA.54 BGFI has since grown into the largest financial-services
firm in Central Africa, with assets in excess of $4 billion as of December
2010. Headquartered, as FIBA had been, in Libreville, BGFI now has
subsidiaries in Abidjan, Antananarivo, Brazzaville, Cotonou, Kinshasa,
Malabo, and Paris. The Brazzaville, Kinshasa, and Libreville branches
are effectively controlled, respectively, by Sassou-Nguesso, Kabila, and
Bongo.
Doubts have arisen about the integrity of these banks. To give one
example, the Swiss NGO Berne Declaration (now known as Public Eye)
has reported on BGFI Brazzaville’s role in what the NGO has called
the “highly questionable business relationship” between a Swiss oil-
trading concern called Philia and the Congolese state oil refinery, which
was being run at the time (2013) by the president’s son, Denis Christel
Sassou-Nguesso. Philia, though based in Switzerland, is controlled by
Jean-Philippe Amvame Ndong, who, along with Yaya Moussa and José
Veiga, was a director of the BAIC in Cotonou.55 In Brazzaville, BGFI
is run by Jean-Dominique Okemba, a Sassou-Nguesso nephew who also
heads the National Security Service, his uncle’s domestic-surveillance
agency. Congo’s leading bank, in other words, is overseen by the coun-
try’s top secret policeman.
The Kinshasa subsidiary of BGFI has only been around since 2010, but
even in that short time it has been repeatedly implicated in Joseph Kabila’s
money-laundering operations. Kabila’s younger sister, Gloria Mteyu, holds
a 35 percent stake, while his adoptive brother, Francis Selemani Mtwale,
is the bank’s CEO. In 2016, a former BGFI Kinshasa employee named
Jean-Jacques Lumumba turned over documents to the Belgian newspaper
Le Soir.56 Based on these, the paper reported that the DRC central bank had
deposited $43 million in a BGFI account owned by a food-processing com-
pany chaired by Albert Yuma, who also heads the state mining company.
The money was never repaid.57 The story led DRC democracy activists
and the Belgian foreign minister to demand an immediate investigation.58
In 2017, Global Witness described Yuma as a “commercial front” for
64 Journal of Democracy

Kabila. In 2015, Gécamines, the state mining company, instructed BGFI to


withdraw $8 million in cash, supposedly for “advance tax payments” to be
sent to the DRC’s central bank. A Yuma associate seems to have withdrawn
the funds, but it has proven impossible to verify whether they were ever actu-
ally deposited at the central bank. One “well-placed source” has called the
transaction an “embezzlement operation.”59 There have been other sugges-
tions of financial improprieties, including when, in 2016, the government’s
electoral commission paid BGFI $2.4 million in “overdraft fees.”60
The struggle for political reform in Central Africa has gone glob-
al. To push back against international constraints on what they can get
away with at home, the region’s autocrats have sought to purchase pol-
icy makers abroad. Citizens and diaspora communities have answered
with legal cases, for courts are far harder to capture. The resulting inves-
tigations, in turn, have led the autocrats to invest in image laundering,
to look for ways to undermine international legal institutions, and to
expand their involvement in private banking.
The implications of these changes are not well understood. Autocrats
around the world spend hundreds of millions of dollars a year on D.C.
lobbyists, but it remains unclear whether this spending yields results.
Though autocrats’ image-laundering campaigns are increasingly sophis-
ticated, no one has yet determined how extensive they are, or what ef-
fects they have. The implications of the move by Central Africa’s auto-
crats into financial services are unclear as well.
Social scientists have long characterized autocratic politics as a struggle
between rulers and ruled. It is. But the contest has now been internation-
alized. To fight back, the international community must understand how
autocrats are reaching beyond their borders to influence politics globally.

NOTES

1. Lo¦k Le Floch-Prigent, Affaire Elf, Affaire d’État (Paris: Cherche Midi, 2001).

2. John Ghazvinian, Untapped: The Scramble for Africa’s Oil (New York: Harcourt,
2007); Nicholas Shaxson, Poisoned Wells: The Dirty Politics of African Oil (New York:
Palgrave Macmillan, 2007).

3. See the investigation by Complement d’Enqu^ete at www.youtube.com/


watch?v=YBlx6WSz5jg.

4. Philippe Bernard, “Le patrimoine des chefs d’Etat africains en France,” Le Monde,
31 January 2008, www.lemonde.fr/societe/article/2008/01/31/le-patrimoine-des-chefs-d-
etat-africains-en-france_1005944_3224.html. Jean-Michel Décugis, “Biens mal acquis:
Les secrets du trésor des Bongo,” Le Parisien, 5 September 2017, www.leparisien.fr/faits-
divers/biens-mal-acquis-les-secrets-du-tresor-des-bongo-05-09-2017-7235712.php.

5. Shaxson, Poisoned Wells.

6. K. Martial Frindéthé, Globalization and the Seduction of Africa’s Ruling Class: An


Argument for a New Philosophy of Development (New York: McFarland, 2010), 72.
Brett L. Carter 65

7. Gitau Warigi, “Betrayed by the Mother Country,” East African, 15 June 2009, www.
theeastafrican.co.ke/magazine/434746-610644-ea9mif/index.html.

8. Laurent Valdiguié, “Bourgi: J’ai vu Chirac et Villepin compter les billets,” Le Jour-
nal du Dimanche, 11 September 2011, www.lejdd.fr/Politique/Actualite/L-avocat-Robert-
Bourgi-raconte-comment-il-a-convoye-jusqu-a-l-Elysee-les-millions-des-chefs-d-Etat-
africains-interview-387001.

9. Henry Samuel, “Nicolas Sarkozy Received Cash from West African Leaders,”
Telegraph, 12 September 2011, www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/nicolas-sar-
kozy/8758267/Nicolas-Sarkozy-received-cash-from-West-African-leaders.html.

10. Thierry de Cabarrus, “Sarkozy, le dictateur congolais et la conférence `a 100.000


euros: un scandale de plus,” Le Nouvel Observateur, 26 July 2014, http://leplus.nou-
velobs.com/contribution/1227189-sarkozy-le-dictateur-congolais-et-la-conference-a-
100-000-euros-un-scandale-de-plus.html.

11. Gail Wannenburg, Africa’s Pablos and Political Entrepreneurs (Johannesburg:


South African Institute of International Affairs, 2006); UN Security Council, “Report of
the Panel of Experts on the Illegal Exploitation of Natural Resources and Other Forms of
Wealth of DR Congo,” 12 April 2001, https://reliefweb.int/report/democratic-republic-
congo/report-panel-experts-illegal-exploitation-natural-resources-and.

12. Henry Samuel, “French Prime Minister Red-Faced over Wife’s Orchestral Ties
to African Autocrat,” Telegraph, 31 March 2016, www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/03/31/
french-prime-minister-red-faced-over-wifes-orchestral-ties-to-af.

13. Romain Herreros, “Pourquoi Marine Le Pen tire un double bénéfice de son voyage
au Tchad,” Huffington Post, 21 March 2017, www.huffingtonpost.fr/2017/03/21/pourquoi-
marine-le-pen-tire-un-double-benefice-de-son-voyage-au-tchad_a_21904476.

14. Bourgi made this remark in an interview with Radio France International on 12
September 2011. A transcript can be found at www.rfi.fr/afrique/20110912-robert-bourgi. 

15. Elise Barthet, “Congo: la presse africaine dénonce le soutien ‘complice’ de Fran-
çois Hollande au président Sassou-Nguesso,” Le Monde, 22 October 2015, www.lemonde.
fr/afrique/article/2015/10/22/congo-la-presse-africaine-denonce-le-soutien-complice-de-
francois-hollande-au-president-sassou-nguesso_4795198_3212.html.

16. José Casado, “Na rota do Atlântico,” O Globo (Rio de Janeiro), 16 February 2016,
http://oglobo.globo.com/opiniao/na-rota-do-atlantico-18679836.

17. Casado, “Na rota do Atlântico.”

18. Gunvor in Congo—Oil, Cash and Misappropriation: The Adventures of a Swiss


Trader in Brazzaville (Lausanne: Public Eye, September 2017), www.publiceye.ch/filead-
min/files/documents/Rohstoffe/PublicEye_Gunvor-in-Congo_report_2017_68p.pdf.

19. This was reported by Elie Smith, a prominent journalist in Central Africa, and con-
firmed to me by a former senior minister in the Sassou-Nguesso government.

20. Philia’s Refined Ventures in Brazzaville: How Swiss Traders Misappropriate Con-
golese Oil Rents (Lausanne: Berne Declaration, February 2015), www.publiceye.ch/filead-
min/files/documents/Rohstoffe/BD-2015-Investigation-Philias_s_refined_ventures.pdf.

21. “Dette cachée du Congo-Brazzaville: le pouvoir fragilisé face au FMI,” Radio


France International, 7 August 2017, www.rfi.fr/afrique/20170807-dette-cachee-congo-
brazzaville-le-pouvoir-fragilise-face-fmi-sassou-nguesso.
66 Journal of Democracy

22. Author’s interview with senior figure in the Congolese oil sector, 2017. Name,
location, and precise date withheld by request.

23. David Bensoussan, “Dominique Strauss-Kahn au chevet du président congolais


Denis Sassou-Nguesso,” MSN Finance, 30 August 2017, www.msn.com/fr-fr/finance/
other/dominique-strauss-kahn-au-chevet-du-pr%C3%A9sident-congolais-denis-sassou-
nguesso/ar-AAr0kai.

24. I have charted the FARA disclosures as they relate to the Republic of Congo on a
graph at www.journalofdemocracy.org/articles/supplemental-material.

25. Anu Narayanswamy, “Corruption Charges Prompt Congo to Lobby Congress,”


Sunlight Foundation, 25 September 2009, https://sunlightfoundation.com/2009/09/25/
corruption-charges-prompt-congo-to-lobby-congress.

26. Carol D. Leonnig, “Congo Republic’s Heavy Use of D.C. Lobbyists Prompts Ques-
tions,” Washington Post, 25 August 2010, www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/ar-
ticle/2010/08/25/AR2010082505238.html.

27. The Riddle of the Sphynx: Where Has Congo’s Oil Money Gone? (London: Global
Witness, December 2005), 10, www.globalwitness.org/en/campaigns/oil-gas-and-mining/
riddle-sphynx-where-has-congos-oil-money-gone.

28. Aria Starck, “Présidentielle 2016: Jo Leinen pour des sanctions contre BOA,”
Echos du Nord, 15 December 2016, http://echosdunord.com/presidentielle-2016-jo-lein-
en-pour-des-sanctions-contre-boa; Elsa Buchanan, “EU Resolution: Gabon May Face
Sanctions If Bloc Not Satisfied with Responses to Alleged Rights Abuse,” International
Business Times, 3 February 2017, www.ibtimes.co.uk/eu-resolution-gabon-may-face-
sanctions-if-bloc-not-satisfied-response-alleged-rights-abuse-1604628.

29. “Biens mal acquis: La fille et le gendre de Denis Sassou-Nguesso mis en examen,”
Radio France International, 25 June 2017, http://www.rfi.fr/afrique/20170625-biens-mal-
acquis-julienne-denis-sassou-nguesso-mis-examen-guy-johnson; Jean-Michel Décugis,
“Biens mal acquis: Un neveu du président du Congo, Sassou-Nguesso, mis en examen,” Le
Parisien, 11 July 2017, http://www.leparisien.fr/faits-divers/biens-mal-acquis-un-neveu-
du-president-du-congo-sassou-nguesso-mis-en-examen-11-07-2017-7126623.php.

30. Vincent Larouche, “Des millions détournés par la famille du président blanchis
`a Montréal,” La Presse (Montreal), 3 December 2016, http://plus.lapresse.ca/screens/
e8b71f3c-eb06-43a6-a1c2-d3641355b332%7C_0.html.

31. “First Lady of Congo, Antoinette Sassou-Nguesso, Served Subpoena in Washing-


ton, D.C.,” PR Newswire, 10 June 2016, www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/first-lady-of-
congo-antoinette-sassou-nguesso-served-subpoena-in-washington-dc-300282994.html; “Fi-
nance Minister of the Republic of Congo Served Subpoena While Visiting Washington, D.C.,
PR Newswire, 11 October 2016, www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/finance-minister-of-
the-republic-of-congo-served-subpoena-while-visiting-washington-dc-300342804.html.

32. Public Eye, Gunvor in Congo, 40; Miguel Alexandre Ganh~ao, “Sócio de José Veiga no
Brasil já está detido em Portugal,” Correio de Manh~a (Lisbon), 21 July 2016, www.cmjornal.
pt/portugal/detalhe/socio_de_jose_veiga_no_brasil_ja_esta_detido_em_portugal.

33. José Casado, “Surpresa em Lisboa,” O Globo (Rio de Janeiro), 29 November 2016,
http://noblat.oglobo.globo.com/geral/noticia/2016/11/surpresa-em-lisboa.html.

34. Luca Salvatori, “Riciclaggio dal Congo Brazzaville: condanne pesanti per Chi-
roni e Bertozzi,” RTV San Marino, 30 January 2017, www.smtvsanmarino.sm/crona-
ca/2017/01/30/san-marino-condannati-chironi-bertozzi-riciclaggio.

35. Sarah N. Lynch, “U.S. Says It Plans to Criminally Charge Gabonese President’s
Brett L. Carter 67

American Lobbyist,” Reuters, 13 September 2017, www.reuters.com/article/usa-court-


moneylaundering/u-s-says-it-plans-to-criminally-charge-gabonese-presidents-american-lob-
byist-idUSL2N1LU1KG; Joe Palazzolo and Drew Hinshaw, “U.S. Seizes Assets from Lob-
byist with Alleged Ties to Gabon’s Leader,” Wall Street Journal, 11 May 2017, www.wsj.
com/articles/u-s-seizes-assets-from-lobbyist-with-alleged-ties-to-gabons-leader-1494534147.

36. Joan Tilouine, “Panama papers: comment le pétrole congolais s’évapore dans les
paradis fiscaux,” Le Monde, 7 April 2016, www.lemonde.fr/afrique/article/2016/04/07/
panama-papers-comment-le-petrole-congolais-s-evapore-dans-les-paradis-fis-
caux_4898082_3212.html; Berne Declaration, Philia’s Refined Ventures in Brazzaville, 8.

37. “Forbes Afrique ou Forbes Sassou?” La Lettre du Continent, 30 August, 2012,


www.africaintelligence.fr/lc-/premier-cercle/2012/08/30/forbes-afrique-ou-forbes-
sassou,106974521-art.

38. De Cabarrus, “Sarkozy, le dictateur congolais, et la conférence `a 100.000 euros.”

39. Geraud Bosman-Delzons. “Africanews, une nouvelle ‘voix’ médiatique sur le con-
tinent africain,” Radio France International, 20 April 2016, www.rfi.fr/afrique/20160420-
africanews-voix-your-voice-media-congo-brazzaville-pointe-noire-peters-naguib-sawir.

40. Brett L. Carter, “Republic of Congo Government Blames Non-Existent Militia


for Attack, Wages War on Citizens,” African Arguments, 19 April 2016, http://africanar-
guments.org/2016/04/19/republic-of-congo-government-blames-non-existent-militia-for-
attack-wages-war-on-citizens.

41. Nicolas Beau, “Rwanda, lorsque Paul Kagamé achetait ‘Jeune Afrique’ en 2004,”
MondAfrique, 4 November 2015, https://mondafrique.com/rwanda-lorsque-paul-kagame-
achetait-jeune-afrique-en-2004/amp.

42. Stéphane Ballong, “Comment Denis Sassou Nguesso est devenu notable `a 10 ans,”
Jeune Afrique, 21 June 2017, www.jeuneafrique.com/mag/446551/politique/denis-sassou-
nguesso-devenu-notable-a-10-ans.

43. “La justice enqu^ete sur l’ami du président congolais,” Le Parisien, 24 April
2002, www.leparisien.fr/faits-divers/la-justice-enquete-sur-l-ami-du-president-congo-
lais-24-04-2002-2003011721.php.

44. Author’s interview with journalist, June 2017, name and location withheld by request.

45. Isaac Arnsdorf and Brianna Gurciullo, “Bryan Cave for Gabon, Mirijanian for Ma-
laysia,” Politico, 20 June 2016, www.politico.com/tipsheets/politico-influence/2016/06/
bryan-cave-for-gabon-mirijanian-for-malaysia-214913.

46. Eli Clifton, “Qorvis Communication Helps Whitewash Equatorial Guinea’s Human
Rights Violations,” Think Progress, 9 March 2012, https://thinkprogress.org/qorvis-com-
munications-helps-whitewash-equatorial-guineas-human-rights-violations-1b930a8a-
b8a0/. See, for example, “Equatorial Guinea Prioritizes Economic and Social Transforma-
tion Through Human Capital Development and Inclusive and Sustainable Growth,” PR
Newswire, 22 September 2016, www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/equatorial-guinea-
prioritizes-economic-and-social-transformation-through-human-capital-development-
and-inclusive-and-sustainable-growth-300333123.html; Focus Washington, “Equatorial
Guinea Is Investing in Improving Lives and Creating Opportunities,” YouTube, 19 May
2014, www.youtube.com/watch?v=iEj1XKD_Cw0&feature=youtu.be.

47. See page 72 (titled “2015 Honor Roll of Contributors”) at www.atlanticcouncil.


org/images/publications/Atlantic_Council_Annual_Report_0513.pdf. Attias Associates is
listed as having within one year donated between $50,000 and $99,999 to the Council,
while Scribe Strategies and Advisors, Szlavik’s firm, gave between $5,000 and $9,999.
68 Journal of Democracy

48. Frederick Kempe, “The Atlantic Council Did Not Give a Global Citizen Award
to Gabonese President Ali Bongo Ondimba,” Foreign Policy, 30 September 2016, http://
foreignpolicy.com/2016/09/30/the-atlantic-council-did-not-give-a-global-citizen-award-
to-gabonese-president-ali-bongo-ondimba-africa-gabon-elections-think-tanks.

49. Ken Silverstein and Brooke Williams, “Chuck Hagel’s Think Tank, Its Donors, and
Intellectual Independence,” New Republic, 12 February 2013, https://newrepublic.com/
article/112398/chuck-hagels-atlantic-council-foreign-donors-and-independence.

50. Thor Halvorssen and Alex Gladstein, “The Atlantic Council’s Questionable Relation-
ship with Gabon’s Leader,” The Hill, 26 October 2016, http://origin-nyi.thehill.com/blogs/
pundits-blog/lobbying-world/303016-the-atlantic-council-questionable-relationship-with-
gabons; Bronwyn Bruton, “It’s Bad in Eritrea, but Not That Bad,” New York Times, 23 June
2016, www.nytimes.com/2016/06/24/opinion/its-bad-in-eritrea-but-not-that-bad.html?_r=0.

51. Nevsun operates the open-pit Bisha Mine, Eritrea’s only working mine. The com-
pany appears on the Atlantic Council’s “Honor Roll of Contributors” at www.atlantic-
council.org/support/supporters. Nevsun’s 2016 donation is listed there as having totaled
between $100,000 and $249,000.

52. Carole Kouassi, “Congo-Brazzaville: Des jeunes appellent `a un retrait de la CPI,”


Africanews, 3 November 2016, http://fr.africanews.com/2016/11/03/congo-brazzaville-des-
jeunes-appellent-a-un-retrait-de-la-cpi/; “Congo-Brazzaville: Des jeunes de la majorité
manifestent pour que le pays quitte la CPI,” Jeune Afrique, 4 November 2016, http://www.
jeuneafrique.com/371411/politique/congo-brazzaville-jeunes-manifestent-pays-quitte-cpi/.

53. Elise Keppler, “AU’s ‘ICC Withdrawal Strategy’ Less Than Meets the Eye,” Hu-
man Rights Watch, 1 February 2017, www.hrw.org/news/2017/02/01/aus-icc-withdrawal-
strategy-less-meets-eye.

54. “2000–2001 Les Premiers développements `a l’International sous l’appellation BG-


FIBANK,” BGFI Bank, http://groupebgfibank.com/en/histoire/premiers-developpements-
a-linternational-lappellation-bgfibank.

55. Berne Declaration, Philia’s Refined Ventures in Brazzaville, 14.

56. Xavier Monnier, “Jean-Jacques Lumumba, banquier congolais exilé et dénoncia-


teur du syst`eme Kabila,” Le Monde Afrique, 22 December 2016, www.lemonde.fr/afrique/
article/2016/12/22/jean-jacques-lumumba-banquier-congolais-exile-et-denonciateur-du-
systeme-kabila_5053068_3212.html; “Corruption au Congo: les preuves qui accablent le ré-
gime Kabila,” Le Soir (Brussels), 29 October 2016, www.lesoir.be/archive/recup/1354761/
article/actualite/monde/2016-10-29/corruption-au-congo-preuves-qui-accablent-regime-
kabila. See also http://lumumbapapers.info for Mteyu’s stake and Mtwale’s role.

57. Wiliam Clowes, “DRC: Kabila Critics Want Probe into Ties Between Family-
Run Bank, Electoral Commission,” Voice of America, 3 November 2016, www.voanews.
com/a/drc-congo-kabila-election-commission-bgfi-bank-ties/3579560.html.

58. Aaron Ross, “Belgium, Congo Activists Urge Probe into Congo Corruption
Claims, 9News Nigeria,” 1 November 2016, www.9newsng.com/belgium-congo-activists-
urge-probe-into-congo-corruption-claims.

59. Global Witness, Regime Cash Machine: How the Democratic Republic of Congo’s
Booming Mining Exports Are Failing to Benefit Its People (London: Global Witness, July
2017), 18, www.globalwitness.org/documents/19146/Regime_Cash_Machine_Report_Fi-
nal_Single_pages_BXObnIm.pdf.

60. Franz Wild, Michael Kavanagh, and Thomas Wilson, “Congo Election Body Said to
Pay Millions to Kabila-Tied Bank,” Bloomberg, 2 November 2016, www.bloomberg.com/
news/articles/2016-11-01/congo-election-body-said-to-pay-millions-to-kabila-linked-bank.
Reproduced with permission of copyright owner. Further
reproduction prohibited without permission.

You might also like