Distance Students - Question Bank
Distance Students - Question Bank
Distance Students - Question Bank
[BUSINESS STATISTICS B]
[ABA3692]
Note 𝛿𝑥̅ is called standard error of mean or Standard deviation of the sampling distribution of
𝑥̅ .
𝑁−𝑛
Note: The finite population correction factor√𝑁−1 , which is required when the population is
𝒏
finite and the sample size is more than 5% of the population size, i.e. > 𝟎. 𝟎𝟓. else the
𝑵
𝒏
correction factors is not necessary if ≤ 𝟎. 𝟎𝟓, were N stands for population size, while n is
𝑵
the sample size
Note the smaller the sample size the bigger the standard error.
variance 𝝈𝟐 is unknown else use Z even if n < 30 (but Using t for all small samples is still fine).
Unknown/ not known variance (means when you only have a sample variance (s2) )
Critical Statistic 𝑡𝛼 or 𝑡𝛼 is the value to be located using the the t-table this is a value of is
2
fount at at 𝑡𝛼, (𝑛−1)𝑑𝑓 .
Parameters Population Sample
Mean 𝝁 ̅
𝒙
Variance 𝝈𝟐 s2
Standard deviation 𝝈 s
1. A population has mean of 300 and a standard deviation of 75. A simple random sample of size
150 will be taken and the sample mean will be used to estimate the population mean.
Solution
a. This is an infinite case because the population size is not indicated only the sample size of 75 is
indicated
𝜎
b. Standard error of mean = 𝜎𝑥̅ = and we do not need the correction factor
√𝑛
𝜎 75
. 𝜎𝑥̅ = = = 6.12
√𝑛 √150
2. To estimate the mean duration of employment in the XPZ Company, a population of 3000 employees,
a simple random sample of 1000 employees is selected with a standard dev of 10.
a. a. Is this a finite or infinite case
b. What is the standard error of mean?
c. What is the standard error of mean if the sample was 50?
d. What is the standard error of mean if the sample was 50 using correction factor?
e. Comment on the answers of c and d
Solution
𝑛 50 𝑛
c. Standard error of mean = 𝜎𝑥̅ since . = = 0.017 means ≤ 0.05. than
𝑁 3000 𝑁
we do not need the correction factor
𝜎 10
. 𝜎𝑥̅ = ( ) = ( ) = 1.41
√𝑛 √50
𝑛 50 𝑛
d. Standard error of mean = 𝜎𝑥̅ since . = = 0.017 means ≤ 0.05. than
𝑁 3000 𝑁
we do not need the correction factor but applying the the correction factor
𝑁−𝑛 𝜎 3000−50 10 2950 10
. 𝜎𝑥̅ = √ ( ) = √ 3000−1 ( ) = √2999 ( ) = 1.40
𝑁−1 √𝑛 √50 √50
e. There seem to be no significant difference between the standard error of mean in c and in d. That
𝑛
is why answer in c because = 0.017 and ≤ 0.05 that is why there is no need for
𝑁
𝑛
correction factor if ≤ 0.05.
𝑁
3. Assume that the following random sample of 12 random sample of mean average scores
received by participants of Ms Namibia Pageant as rated judges are normal population
9,11,10; 8; 12; 14; 13; 11; 7; 8. 7,12
d. Assume that the point estimate of mean and standard deviation are equal to the population mean
and standard deviation. Compute the probability that a pageant receives a mean score is more
than 11 draw the distribution area.
Solution
Sum 𝑥̅
𝑥𝑖 9 11 10 8 12 14 13 11 7 8 7 12 122 10.17
- - -
-1.17 0.83 1.83 3.83 2.83 0.83 -3.17 -3.17 1.83 0
(𝑥𝑖 -𝑥̅ ) 0.17 2.17 2.17
(𝑥𝑖 -𝑥̅ )2 1.37 0.69 0.03 4.71 3.35 14.67 8.01 0.69 10.05 4.71 10.05 3.35 61.68
∑𝑥𝑖 61.68
(a) Point estimate of population mean = (𝑥̅ ) = 𝑛
= 12
= 10.17
∑(𝑥𝑖−𝑥
̅̅̅ )2 61.68
(b) Point estimate of population standard deviation = 𝑠 = √ 𝑛−1
= √ 12
= 𝟐. 𝟑𝟕
𝛿 2.37
(c) Standard error of mean = 𝛿𝑥̅ = = = 𝟎. 𝟔𝟖𝟒
√𝑛 √12
𝑥̅ −𝜇 11−10.17 0.83
(d) For 𝑥̅ = 11 scores, → 𝑧 = = = = 1.21 The probability at Z = 1.21 give p =
𝜎𝑥̅ 𝟎.𝟔𝟖𝟒 𝟎.𝟔𝟖𝟒
0.3869
4. Employees at Kambwa Trading spend an average of 4 weeks job leave during the 2017
operation. Assume that 4 weeks is the population with a population standard deviation
of 1.581. Using a sample of 27 employees.
Solution
c. P (5.5 ≤ 𝜇 ≤6.5) weeks (Note although the sample is less than 30 which means we should [5]
have used (t- distribution) but we cannot use t- distribution because variance 𝝈𝟐 is
known we and there is no 𝜶 (𝒂𝒍𝒑𝒉𝒂) or confidence level given in the question. Therefore
we use Z- distribution.
𝑥̅ −𝜇 5.5−4 1.5
For 𝑥̅ = 6.5 weeks, → 𝑧 = 𝜎𝑥̅
= 0.304
= 0.304 = 4.93
𝑥̅ −𝜇 6.5−4 2.5
and for 𝑥̅ = 9.5 𝑤𝑒𝑒𝑘𝑠 → 𝑧 = 𝜎𝑥̅
= 0.304 = 0.304 = 8.23
The Z table goes up 3.09, therefore, the highest probability at both 4.93 and 8.23 = 0.4990,
Therefore, the probability is 0.4990 - 0.4990 = 0.00
f. What is the probability that mean leave is less or equal 2.5 weeks [5]
𝑥̅ −𝜇 2.5−4 −1.5
For 𝑥̅ = 6.5 weeks, → 𝑧 = 𝜎𝑥̅
= 0.304
= 0.304 = −𝟒. Note the Z- table goes only up 3.09,
then we use the highest probability of 0.4990, Hence P ( 𝜇 ≤ 2.5) = 0.5 − 0.4990 = 𝟎. 𝟎𝟎𝟏.
5. A total 350 Business statistics students out of a sample 600 who set for exams in
the first semester passed the course.
a. What is the point estimate of the proportion of the population of students who passed
the course?
b. What is the point estimate of the proportion standard deviation of students who
passed the course?
c. Assume that the point estimate in (a) is equal to the population proportion. What is
the probability that proportion of the population of students who passed the course is
more than 55%
d Draw shape of the sampling distribution of p¯ in (c)
Solution
a. Point estimate of p.
350
𝐸(𝑝̅) = 600 = 0.58
c. What is the probability that the proportion of dissatisfied employees is more than 0.35
𝑝̅ −𝑝 0.55−0.58 −0.03
.𝑧 = = = 0.0201 = −1.49
𝜎𝑝
̅ 0.0201
𝜎
E = 𝑧𝛼 𝜎𝑥̅ = 𝑧𝛼 is called the Merging of error mean
2 2 √𝑛
𝑝(1−𝑝)
E = 𝑧𝛼 𝜎𝑝̅ = 𝑧𝛼 √ is called the Merging of error proportion
2 2 𝑛
2
(𝑧𝛼/2 ) 𝜎2
. 𝑛= sample size for the population mean
𝐸2
2
(𝑧𝛼 ) 𝑝(1−𝑝)
2
.𝑛 = = Sample size of the population proportion
𝐸2
𝝈
Confidence interval for the population mean = 𝐱̅ ∓ 𝒛𝜶
𝟐 √𝒏
̅(𝟏−𝒑
𝒑 ̅)
̅ ∓ 𝒛𝜶 √
Confidence interval for the population proportion = 𝒑
𝟐 𝒏
6. Rhino park hospital in Windhoek collected user profile data that showed that 30% of
the users were men. Assume that this percentage was based on a sample of 700 users.
a. What is the margin of error associated with the estimated proportion of users who are men at 95%
confidence level ?
b. Construct 95% confidence interval for the population proportion of the users who are men?
c. Construct 98% confidence interval for the population proportion of the users who are men?
d. With a .95 probability, what size of sample should be taken if the desired margin of error is 3%?
Solution
𝛼
a) α = 1 - 0.95 = 0.05 and = 0.025, n = 700, 𝑝̅ = 0.30
2
𝛼
Z = Z0.025 → 0.5-0.025= 0.475 in the table = 1.96, therefore
2
𝑝(1−𝑝) (0.3)(0.70)
∴ 𝐸 = 𝑧𝛼 √ = 1.96√ = 𝟎. 𝟎𝟑
2 𝑛 700
𝑝̅ (1−𝑝̅ )
b) The 95% confidence interval is 𝑝̅ ∓ 𝑧𝛼 √ = 𝑝̅ ∓ 0.03
2 𝑛
𝑝̅ (1−𝑝̅ )
c) The 98% confidence interval is = 𝑝̅ ∓ 𝑧𝛼 √
2 𝑛
𝛼
α = 1 - 0.98 = 0.02 and = 0.01
2
𝛼
Z 2 = Z0.01 → 0.5-0.01= 0.490 in the table = 2.33,
𝑝(1−𝑝) (0.30)(0.70)
∴ 𝐸 = 𝑧𝛼 √ = 2.33√ = 𝟎. 𝟎𝟒
2 𝑛 700
𝑝̅ (1−𝑝̅ )
= 𝑝̅ ∓ 𝑧𝛼 √ = 𝑝̅ ∓ .0.04 and since 𝑝̅ = 0.30 𝑝̅ ∓ .0.04
2 𝑛
7. A sample of 144 dogs showed an average weight of 16 kg. The Variance of the population is
known to be 1.96 kg.
Solution
𝝈 𝟏.𝟒
a. Standard error of mean = 𝝈𝒙̅ = = = 0.12 kg
√𝒏 √𝟏𝟒𝟒
Because the higher the confidence percentage level the wider the confidence interval.
e. With a 0.95 probability, the a sample size to provide a margin of error of 0.16 kg?
𝛼 𝛼
Not at P =0.95, α = 1 - 0.95 = 0.05 and 2 = 0.025, n = 144 and Z 2 = Z0.025 → 0.5-
0.025= 0.475 in the table = 1.96.
2
(𝑧𝛼/2 ) 𝜎2 (1.96)2 (1.4)2
Sample size = 𝑛 = = = 294.12 ≅ 𝟐𝟗𝟓 𝒅𝒐𝒈𝒔
𝐸2 0.162
b. Construct a 75% confidence interval for the true average amount of time customers
spent in the restaurant. Because Variance 𝝈𝟐 is unknown we use t-distribution
even though n is more than 30
c. Construct a 90% confidence interval for the true average amount of time customers
spent in the restaurant.
d Discuss why the answers in Parts (a) and (b) are different
The higher the confidence percentage levels the wider the confidence interval. In this case the
confidence interval at 90% is 8.86 minutes wider compare to 6.84 at 75% confidence interval.
e. With a .95 probability, how large of a sample would have to be taken to provide a
margin of error of 3 minutes or less?
𝛼 𝛼
Not at P =0.95, α = 1 - 0.95 = 0.05 and 2 = 0.025, and Z 2 = Z0.025 → 0.5-0.025=
0.475 in the table = 1.96.
2
(𝑧𝛼 ) 𝑠2
2 (1.96)2 (14)2
Hence the population size = 𝑛 = 𝐸2
= 32
= 83.66 ≅ 𝟖𝟒
Note
Critical value approach for larger samples takes the hypotheses test decision by
𝑥̅ −𝜇𝑜
comparing test statics = Zc = 𝜎 and critical statistic
√𝑛
𝑍𝛼 (𝟐 𝒔𝒊𝒅𝒆𝒅 𝒄𝒂𝒔𝒆)𝑜𝑟 𝑍𝛼 (𝒐𝒏𝒆 − 𝒔𝒊𝒅𝒆𝒅 𝒄𝒂𝒔𝒆) is the value to be located using the the
2
Z table this is a value of Z at p = 0.5 – 𝛼 . Note Z is used when population variance
𝝈𝟐 is known else use t-distribution even if n ≥ 30 (but Using Z fall large sample is still
be fine).
Critical value approach for small samples (n < 30)takes the hypotheses test decision by
𝑥̅ −𝜇𝑜
comparing test statics = tc & critical statistic = tα, were tc = 𝜎 and
√𝑛
𝑡𝛼 (𝟐 𝒔𝒊𝒅𝒆𝒅 𝒄𝒂𝒔𝒆) 𝑜𝑟 𝑡𝛼 (𝟐 𝒔𝒊𝒅𝒆𝒅 𝒄𝒂𝒔𝒆) is the value to be located using the t-table at
2
𝑡𝛼,(𝑛−1)𝑑𝑓 . Note t- distribution is used when population variance 𝝈𝟐 is unknown else
use Z even if n < 30 (but Using t for all small samples is still be fine). Unknown/ not
known variance (means when you only have a sample variance (s2) )
ρ value approach takes the hypotheses test decision by comparing p value at α against
the p value = 0.5- (probability at Zc in Z the table) for one sided test. Multiply p-value by
two for two sided case
Let μo denote the specific numerical value being considered in the null and alternative
hypotheses. In general, a hypothesis test about the values of a population mean μ must
take one of the following forms.
Ho : μ ≥ μ o Ho : : μ ≤ μ o H0 : μ = μ 0
Ho : μ < Ho Ha : μ > μ o Ha : μ ≠ μ o
The choice of Ho and Ha is in many situations not so obvious and judgement is necessary to select
the proper form. However, as the preceding forms show, the equality part of the expression
(either ≥, ≤, or = always appears in the null hypothesisand < or > or ≠ μ0 appears in the
alternative hypothesis).
• We uses a Z test for the samples(n ≥30) and only when variance 𝝈𝟐 is known else use
t-distribution even if n ≥ 30
• We use T- test for samples (n < 30) to determine whether x̅ deviates significantly to
justify rejecting the null hypothesis
9. It is known that the mean filing quantity for Chloride containers at Windhoek
Chemicals is 5 mg with the population standard deviation is 𝝈 = 𝟎. 𝟏𝟖 ; sample of 26
containers provided the mean of 4.92 mg.
Solution
a. 𝐻𝑜 : 𝜇 ≥ 5
𝐻𝑎 : 𝜇 < 5
b. Test null hypothesis at the 1% level of significance, using the critical value approach
We are using z- distribution because variance 𝝈𝟐 is known even though n is less than
30. Note This is a one sided lower tail test
2.32+2.33
Also then since, Zα = Z0.01 = = - 2.325
2
c. Test null hypothesis at the 1% level of significance , using the P- value approach
d. Using both the p value and critical value approach. We have rejected the H0, hence the population
mean is less than 5mg.
10. The Clicks cosmetics company believes it has a 35 percent share of the market in skin
care products in the country. This claim is questioned by a competitor, the Edgars
cosmetics saying Clicks cosmetics’ market share is less than as report. Edgars
consequently undertook a market research to survey females who use skin care
products. The market research sampled 400 females who used skin care products of
who 120 indicated that they used the Clicks cosmetic exclusively.
Solution
b. Ho :𝑝 ≥ 0.35
Ha: 𝑝 < 0.35
120
c. Note α = 0.05 , 𝑝̅ = = 0.30, and this is a one sided lower tail test .
400
Reject Ho if Zc < Zα and since, Zα = Z0.05 → 0.5-0.05= 0.495 in the table Zα at
2.57+2.58
P=0.495, lies between 0.4949 and 0.4951 = hence Zα = = 2.575
2
𝑝̅ −𝑝 0.30−0.35 −0.05
𝑧= = = 0.0239 = −2.09 ∴ Since 𝑍𝑐 > 𝑍𝛼 𝑎𝑠 − 2.09 > −2.575, We
𝜎𝑝
̅ 0.0239
d. We conclude that the market share for Clicks cosmetics at least 35% hey have reported
11. Mean monthly basic salary for UNAM employees is 𝝁 = 𝟏𝟖, 𝟔𝟖𝟖 and NANTU claims
that mean salary is not what UNAM says. A sample of 400 UNAM employees shows a
sample mean salary of $16,860 and a standard deviation of $14,624?
Solution
a. 𝐻𝑜 : 𝜇 = 18.688
𝐻𝑎 : 𝜇 ≠ 18.688
Reject Ho if P ≤ α = 0.05
𝑥̅ −𝜇𝑜 16.860−18.688 −1.828
Zc = 𝑠 = 14.624 = = -2.5
0.7312
√𝑛 √400
When Formulate hypotheses about a population variance we uses a Chi-square test statistics to
determine whether 𝜎 2 deviates significantly to justify rejecting the null hypothesis
2
One-sided 𝒖𝒑𝒑𝒆𝒓 𝒕𝒂𝒊𝒍 𝒕𝒆𝒔𝒕 use 𝜒𝛼,(𝑛−1)𝑑𝑓 as the Chi-square Critic statistics when
formulating your rejection region
2
i.e Reject 𝐻𝑜 if 𝜒 2 > 𝜒𝛼,(𝑛−1)𝑑𝑓 or simply Reject 𝐻𝑜 𝜒 2 > 𝜒𝛼2
(𝑛−1)𝑠2 (𝑛−1)𝑠2
Interval for Variance = 2 ≤ 𝜎2 ≤ ,
𝜒𝛼/2 𝜒2 𝛼
(1− )
2
(𝑛−1)𝑠2 (𝑛−1)𝑠2
Interval for Standard deviation = √ 2 ≤ 𝜎2 ≤ ,
𝜒𝛼 𝜒2 𝛼
2 (1− )
2
Note the difference between the lower and upper bound denominators of the confidence interval
and the one-sided lower and upper tail Chi-square Critic statistics
12. Pupkewitz MadgeTech reported that the MadgeTech production variance of process is
less or equal to 25. A sample of 31 production process was tested and variance of 28.
Solution
a. 50% confidence intervals for the variance. 𝑆𝑖𝑛𝑐𝑒 𝜎 2 = 25 since 𝑠 2 = 28 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑛 = 31
α = 0.5
(𝑛−1)𝑠2 (𝑛−1)𝑠2
2 ≤ 𝜎2 ≤ , and from the chi-square distribution table with 30 degrees of
𝜒𝛼/2 𝜒2 𝛼
(1− )
2
Since standard dev = 𝜎 = √𝜎 2 hence, confidence intervals for the standard deviation is
(𝑛−1)𝑠2 (𝑛−1)𝑠2 (30)(28) (30)(28) 840 840
√ 2 ≤ 𝜎2 ≤ ,= √ ≤ 𝜎2 ≤ = √46.9792 ≤ 𝜎 2 ≤ 16.7907
𝜒𝛼 𝜒2 𝛼 2
𝜒0.025 2
𝜒0.975
(1− )
2 2
= √17.88 ≤ 𝜎 2 ≤ 50.03 = 𝟒. 𝟐𝟑 ≤ 𝝈 ≤ 𝟕. 𝟎𝟕
13. Namibia Elite Provident Fund (NEPF) is known to have a variance of 35% in annual returns.
An Economic Research Society claims that the variance of NEPF returns is not true. A ample
of 12 annual returns was found to have a standard deviation 5%.
Solution
a. Null and alternative hypotheses to be tested
𝐻𝑜 : 𝜇 = 35%
𝐻𝑎 : 𝜇 ≠ 35%
Hence 𝜒2 𝛼 = 2
𝜒0.95, 11 𝑑𝑓 = 4.57481 and 𝜒 2𝛼 (𝑛 − 1) = 2
𝜒0.05, 11 𝑑𝑓 = 19.67514
(1− )(𝑛−1) ( )
2 2
(𝑛−1)𝑠2 (11)25 275
And 𝜒 2 = 𝜎𝑜2
= 35
= 35
= 7.86
Since 𝜒 2 > 𝜒 2 𝛼 or 𝜒 2 < 𝜒(2𝛼) .as 7.86> 4.57481, and 7.86 < 19.67514 ∴ we fail to reject
(1− ) 2
2
the Ho
d. 95% confidence intervals for standard deviation is, 𝑆𝑖𝑛𝑐𝑒 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑛 𝜎 2 = 35 since s = 7 then
𝑠 2 = 52 = 25 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑛 = 12 and α = 0.05
(𝑛−1)𝑠2 (𝑛−1)𝑠2
Population standard deviation =√ 2
𝜒𝛼/2
≤ 𝜎 ≤ √ 𝜒2 , and from the chi-square distribution
𝛼
(1− 2 )
𝜒2 𝛼
2
= 𝜒0.975, 11 𝑑𝑓 = 3.81575
(1− )
2
14. CODEL claims that the standard deviation of the study guide delivery time to
distance students less than 8 days after registration. A sample of 30 studded
was taken and a standard deviation 10 days delivery time was recorded.
Solution
2
At α = 0.05 Reject Ho if 𝜒 2 < 𝜒(1−𝛼) , this is a one sided lower tail test
2 2
hence 𝜒1−𝛼 = 𝜒0,95 and from the chi-square distribution table with 29 degrees of
2 (𝑛−1)𝑠2 (29)100 2900
freedom𝜒0,95, 29 𝑑𝑓 = 17.7083, and 𝜒 2 = = = = 45.31
𝜎𝑜2 64 64
2
Since 𝜒 2 > 𝜒(1−𝛼) as 45.31> 17.7083, ∴ we do not reject the Ho or we accept the Ho
the variance of delivery time is higher than 64 days
(𝑛−1)𝑠2 (𝑛−1)𝑠2
Population standard deviation =√ 2 ≤ 𝜎 ≤ √ 𝜒2 , and from the chi-square
𝜒𝛼/2 𝛼
(1− )
2
2 2
𝜒(1− 𝛼 = 𝜒0.95, 26 𝑑𝑓 = 17.7083
)
2
15. The size of space allocated to groups or individual exhibitors at Katima trade fair was
allocated as follows: the space size per member is based on a number of members in a
group
Solution
x y x2 xy ̂ = 𝟑𝟎. 𝟑𝟑 − 𝟏. 𝟖𝟕𝟕𝒙.
𝒚 ̂ 𝒊 )𝟐
(𝒚𝒊 − 𝒚 ̅𝒊 )𝟐
(𝒚𝒊 − 𝒚 (𝒚 ̅ 𝒊 )𝟐
̂𝒊 − 𝒚
2 25 4 50 26.6 2.5 3.2 11.4
3 25 9 75 24.7 0.1 3.2 2.2
5 20 25 100 20.9 0.9 10.2 5.1
1 30 1 30 28.5 2.4 46.2 27.6
8 16 64 128 15.3 0.5 51.8 62.2
19 116 103 383 6.3 114.8 108.5
𝑥̅ 3.8 𝑺𝑺𝑬 𝑺𝑺𝑻 𝑺𝑺𝑹
𝑦̅ 23.2
a) 𝑦̂ = 𝑏0 + 𝑏1 𝑥 ,
(∑ 𝑥𝑖 ∑ 𝑦𝑖 ) (19)(116)
∑ 𝑥𝑖 𝑦 𝑖 − 383− 383−440.8 102.8
𝑏1 = 𝑛
2 = 5
(19)2
= = = −1.877
2 (∑ 𝑥𝑖 ) 103− 103−72.2 30.8
∑ 𝑥𝑖 − 5
𝑛
̂ = 𝟑𝟎. 𝟑𝟑 − 𝟏𝟖𝟕𝟕𝒙.
∴𝒚
b) 𝑆𝑆𝐸 = ∑(𝑦𝑖 − 𝑦̂𝑖 )2 = 6.33, 𝑆𝑆𝑇 = ∑(𝑦𝑖 − 𝑦̅𝑖 )2 = 𝟏𝟏𝟒. 𝟖 and 𝑆𝑆𝑅 = ∑(𝑦̂𝑖 − 𝑦̅𝑖 )2 =
𝟏𝟎𝟖. 𝟓
𝑆𝑆𝑅 108.86
c) 𝑟 2 = = = .948
𝑆𝑆𝑇 114.8
d) The coefficient of determination of 0.948 means that 94.8% of the variability in the data
is explained by using the estimated regression equation (model) and only 5.2% which is
not captured by these model.
f) Since the value of r is close to -1, this means there is a very strong negative leaner
relationship number of members (x) and space size (y).
16. Below you are given information on a woman's age and her annual expenditure on
purchase of books.
Solution
x y x2 xy ̂ = 𝟓𝟒. 𝟕𝟒 + 𝟕. 𝟓𝟒𝒙.
𝒚 ̂𝒊 )𝟐
(𝒚𝒊 − 𝒚 ̅𝒊 )𝟐
(𝒚𝒊 − 𝒚 (𝒚 ̅𝒊 )𝟐
̂𝒊 − 𝒚
18 210 324 3780 190.46 382.2025 156.25 1027.20
22 180 484 3960 220.62 1649.1721 1806.25 3.57
21 220 441 4620 213.08 48.0249 6.25 88.92
28 280 784 7840 265.86 200.2225 3306.25 1879.22
89 890 2033 20200 2279.62 5275 2998.92
𝑥̅ 22.25 SSE SST SSR
𝑦̅ 222.5
a. y the expenditure is the depended variable which depends on x the age of a woman
which is the independent variable.
(∑ 𝑥𝑖 ∑ 𝑦𝑖 ) (89)(890)
∑ 𝑥𝑖 𝑦 𝑖 − 20200−
̂ = 𝒃𝟎 + 𝒃𝟏 𝒙 , since 𝑏1 =
𝒚 𝑛
2 = 4
(89)2
= 7.54 and
2 (∑ 𝑥𝑖 ) 2033−
∑ 𝑥𝑖 − 4
𝑛
̂ = 𝟓𝟒. 𝟕𝟒 + 𝟕. 𝟓𝟒𝒙.
∴𝒚
d. Coefficient of determination.
𝑆𝑆𝑅
= 𝑟 2 = 𝑆𝑆𝑇 , note ̂𝒊 )𝟐 = 2279.62, 𝑺𝑺𝑻 = ∑(𝒚𝒊 − 𝒚
since 𝑺𝑺𝑬 = ∑(𝒚𝒊 − 𝒚 ̅𝒊 )𝟐 = 𝟓𝟐𝟕𝟓 and
𝑆𝑆𝑅 2998.92
𝑆𝑆𝑅 = ∑(𝑦̂𝑖 − 𝑦̅𝑖 )2 = 𝟐𝟗𝟗𝟖. 𝟗𝟐 and hence = 𝑟 2 = 𝑆𝑆𝑇 = = 𝟎. 𝟓𝟕
5275
f. Since the value of r is close to 1, this means there is a very strong positive leaner relationship between age
(x) of a woman and annual book purchase expenditure (y).
.
17. An Old Mutual client’s portfolio of shares and their prices in 2012 and 2017 are listed
in the table below. Use 2012 as base year.
(275)(400)+(185)(250)+(2515)(150) (125)(300)+(235)(300)+(1865)(100)
=(125)(400)+(235)(250)+(1865)(150) ∗ 100 =(125)(400)+(235)(250)+(1865)(150) ∗ 100
533500 294500
=388500 ∗ 100 = 137.32 =388500 ∗ 100 = 75.80
b. Interpretation The share price have increased by 37.32% Based on the current share prices the quanity
over the period from 2012 to 2017 that can be purchased has decreased 25 % over
the period from 2012 to 2017
𝑃 𝑄 𝑃 𝑄
c. Paasche 𝐼2017 = ∑ 𝑃1 𝑄1 (100) 𝐼2017 = ∑ 𝑃1 𝑄1(100)
indexes 𝑜 1 1 0
(275)(300)+(185)(300)+(2515)(100) (275)(300)+(185)(300)+(2515)(100)
=(125)(300)+(235)(300)+(1865)(100) ∗ 100 =(275)(400)+(185)(250)+(2515)(150) ∗ 100
389500 389500
=294500 ∗ 100 = 132.25 =533500 ∗ 100 = 73.01
d. Interpretation The share price have increased by 32.25% Based on the current share prices the quanity
over the period from 2012 to 2017 that can be purchased has decreased 26.9 %
over the period from 2012 to 2017
18. The flowing table contain prices and quantities of Bread, Milk, Sugar, Apple Juice and
Orange Juice products of Spar Shopping for the years 2008, 2011 and 2015.
Price Quantity
Product 2011 2014 2018 2011 2014 2018
Apple juice (500mil) 8 12 18 4 4 3
Orange Juice (500mil) 9 14 21 4 4 3
Butter (500g) 6 8 12 5 6 5
Milk(1litre) 7 15 22 5 3 3
sugar (2kg) 14 20 27 5 4 2
a. Compute the Paasche price and quantity indexes for 2015 using 2008 as the base year.
b. Provide interpretations of the Paasche price and quantity indexes in (a)
c. Compute the Paasche price and quantity indexes for 2015 using 2011 as the base year.
d. Provide interpretations of the Paasche price and quantity indexes in (c)
e. Compute the Laspeyres price and quantity indexes for 2015 using 2008 as the base year.
f. Provide interpretations of the Laspeyres price and quantity indexes in (e)
g. Compute the Laspeyres price and quantity indexes for 2015 using 2011 as the base year.
i. Provide interpretations of the Laspeyres price and quantity indexes in (g)
i. Comment on the results of Laspeyres comparison to Paasche indexes
b. Interpretation The product prices have increased by 128.46% over Based on the current prices the quanity that can be
the period from 2008 to 2015 purchased has decreased 35.57% over the period
from 2008 to 2015
𝑃 𝑄 𝑃 𝑄
c. Paasche price 𝐼2017 = ∑ 𝑃1 𝑄1 (100) 𝐼2017 = ∑ 𝑃1 𝑄1(100)
and quantity 𝑜 1 1 0
d. Interpretation The product prices have increased by 46.31% over the Based on the current prices the quanity that can be
period from 2011 to 2015 purchased has decreased 26.11 % over the period
from 2011 to 2015
𝑃 𝑄 𝑃 𝑄
e. Laspeyres 𝐼2018 = ∑ 𝑃1 𝑄0 (100) 𝐼2018 = ∑ 𝑃0 𝑄1 (100)
indexes 2015 𝑜 0 𝑜 0
461 130
=203 ∗ 100 = 227.09 =203 ∗ 100 = 64.04
f. Interpretation The product prices have increased by 127.09% over Based on the current prices the quanity that can be
the period from 2008 to 2015 purchased has decreased 35.96 % over the period
from 2008 to 2015
𝑃 𝑄 𝑃 𝑄
g. Laspeyres 𝐼2018 = ∑ 𝑃1 𝑄0 (100) 𝐼2018 = ∑ 𝑃0 𝑄1 (100)
indexes 2018 𝑜 0 𝑜 0
402 203
=277 ∗ 100 = 145.13 = ∗ 100 = 73.29
277
h. Interpretation The product prices have increased by 45.13% over the Based on the current prices the quanity that can be
period from 2011 to 2015 purchased has decreased 26.71 % over the period
from 2011 to 2015
Both Laspeyres and Paasche indexes have shown the same trend in terms of price increase of the given period and
the reduction in quantise that can be purchased.