(Asce) MT 1943-5533 0004420
(Asce) MT 1943-5533 0004420
(Asce) MT 1943-5533 0004420
Abstract: This paper investigates the viability of recycling construction and demolition waste as aggregate in porous asphalt pavement for
Downloaded from ascelibrary.org by K L University on 09/26/22. Copyright ASCE. For personal use only; all rights reserved.
stormwater runoff management. The influence of granulometric composition, recycled aggregate content (0%, 12.5%, 25%, and 37.5%), and
binder content (4% to 6%) was investigated. A comprehensive characterization to identify the minimum binder content that might ensure a
suitable hydraulic conductivity with minimum influence in the mechanical properties and moisture-induced damage was performed. The
tested mixtures presented suitable particle loss, tensile strength, moisture-induced damage, and hydraulic conductivity for application as
porous asphalt mixture for urban stormwater runoff management. The use of recycled aggregate resulted in acceptable air voids content
only in mixtures produced with a binder content of 4.5%. The porous asphalt mixture produced with granulometric composition GC3,
25% recycled aggregate, and 4.5% asphalt binder could be potentially used for the intended application in stormwater runoff management.
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0004420. © 2022 American Society of Civil Engineers.
Author keywords: Permeable asphalt pavement; Water runoff; Recycled aggregate; Circular economy.
particle loss, indirect tensile strength, moisture susceptibility, and Porous Asphalt Concrete Mixtures
hydraulic conductivity. The experimental program included four
The porous asphalt mix design involves determining aggregate
main stages: (1) natural and recycled aggregate characterization; properties, selecting aggregate gradation, and determining the op-
(2) production of porous asphalt mixtures; (3) preliminary assess-
timum binder content (trials in 0.5% increments) considering the
ment of the porous asphalt mixtures; and (4) comprehensive char- chosen granulometric composition. Table 2 presents the porous as-
acterization of the most suitable granulometric composition and
phalt mixtures prepared with up to 37.5% recycled aggregate, 4%
optimum binder content.
to 6% binder content, and 2% filler to improve the aggregate–
The proposed porous asphalt pavement produced with recycled
binder adhesivity. Based on previous studies reported in the liter-
aggregates applicable to sidewalks and low-traffic areas for urban
ature (Brasileiro 2013; Silva 2009), a maximum recycled aggregate
stormwater runoff management might partially obey the pervious
content of 37.5% was defined to avoid excessive particle loss.
concrete and the porous/open-graded asphalt concrete concepts.
The binder content of 4% to 6% complies with the requirements
It differs from the pervious concrete definition (Table 1) due to
of DNER-ES 386/99 for porous-layer asphalt-polymer concrete
the use of asphalt binder but matches the water percolation re-
(IPR 1999). The porous asphalt mixtures were prepared by heating
quirements related to permeable pavement applied to low-traffic
the binder and the aggregate based on the viscosity flow curve and
zones. On the other hand, it does not fully match the definitions
mixing the materials according to proportions presented in Table 2
for open-graded friction course asphalt and porous-layer asphalt-
(IPR 1995). Cylindrical Marshall specimens (ϕ 100 mm and
polymer concrete (Table 1) because it might not be applicable as
63.5 mm height) were then compacted with a Marshall hammer
an overlay to dense-graded asphalt or used under high volumes
by applying 50 blows to each face (IPR 1995).
of traffic. Thus, because there is relatively little guidance for
the design of mixtures used for porous asphalt pavements for Asphalt Binder
stormwater runoff management (Putman and Kline 2012), the The asphalt binder FLEXPAVE 60=85 is a styrene-butadiene-
mechanical and hydraulic conductivity characterization of the styrene (SBS) polymer-modified asphalt binder that follows the
mixtures proposed in this paper were performed based on the rec- Brazilian National Department of Infrastructure and Transport
ommendations of ASTM D7064/D7064M (ASTM 2013) for (IPR 2010) requirements presented in Table 3.
open-graded friction course asphalt mixtures, American Concrete
Institute (ACI) 522R-10 [ACI Committee 522 (ACI 2010)] Granulometric Composition Ranges
for pervious concrete pavements, and the National Highway Porous asphalt mixtures are produced with high-quality open-
Department-Service Specification DNER-ES 386/99 (IPR graded aggregate to obtain a coarse granular skeleton that develops
1999), for porous asphalt-polymer concrete applied in pavement stone-on-stone contact and a high interconnected air voids content,
overlay and NBR 16416 (ABNT 2015) for permeable pavements. guaranteed by the discontinuity of the granulometric composition
A statistical analysis data has been performed for the results ob- (Alvarez et al. 2011; National Academies of Sciences, Engineering,
tained in this experimental program using two-way ANOVA and and Medicine 2018). In this sense, three granulometric composi-
Student t-test with α 0.05. Thus, three samples of each porous as- tions used in the porous asphalt mixtures, presented in Fig. 3.
phalt concrete mixture were produced to perform each test GC1, GC2, and GC3 were selected based on previous studies re-
described in the following sections. ported in the literature:
Aggregates
The recycled aggregate was provided by a local recycling plant that
processes construction and demolition waste to produce coarse re-
cycled aggregate No. 0 (ϕ 4.8–9.5 mm), No. 1 (ϕ 9.5–19 mm), and
No. 3 (ϕ 19–25 mm). The recycled aggregate used in this experi-
mental program consisted mainly of concrete, mortar, and red
Fig. 3. Granulometric composition ranges. ceramic waste (Table 4 and Fig. 4).
The natural aggregates used to produce the reference porous
asphalt mixture were coarse granitic aggregate (Nos. 0 and 1),
crushed stone dust, and fine aggregate, with the properties pre-
sented in Table 5. The apparent specific gravity and cubicity of re-
Table 4. Recycled aggregate gravimetric composition cycled coarse aggregate correspond to 68% and 75% of that of
natural coarse aggregate. Only the natural coarse aggregate com-
Recycled Recycled
plies with the minimum shape factor of 0.50 and maximum 30%
aggregate aggregate
Group no. 0 no. 1
abrasion for application in porous-layer asphalt-polymer concrete
(IPR 1999) and 30% abrasion for open-graded friction course as-
Concrete/mortar (%) 60.4 54.5 phalt mixtures (ASTM 2013). The durability test showed that the
Ceramic brick (%) 23.7 19.3 mass loss of recycled aggregate was higher than that of natural ag-
Rocks/granite/marble (%) 9.8 17.1
gregate, reflecting a large amount of red ceramic in the recycled
Ceramic tile (%) 3.6 3.9
Othersa (%) 2.5 2.2 aggregate composition. The coarse aggregate durability index for ap-
a
plication in porous-layer asphalt-polymer concrete might be lower
Maximum 3% of others (i.e., wood, plastic, and steel) for application as than 12% (IPR 1999).
recycled aggregate according to Brazilian Standard NBR 15116 (ABNT Natural and recycled aggregates showed good aggregate–
2004).
binder adhesivity after 72 h of water immersion at 40°C without
any signal of asphalt binder detachment (IPR 1994a), as shown in
Fig. 5. The aggregate–binder adhesivity influences the internal
• GC1: specified at grading envelope Range V as per DNER ES friction that prevents particle loss and contributes to a stable mac-
386/99 (IPR 1999) of the Brazilian National Highway Depart- rotexture with adequate interlocking (Dumke 2005).
ment for porous-layer asphalt-polymer concrete [100% passing
the 1.9 cm (¾-in.) sieve, 70%–100% passing the 1.27 cm
Mechanical Strength and Hydraulic Conductivity
(1=2-in:) sieve, 50%–80% passing the 0.951 cm (3=8-in:) sieve,
Characterization
18%–30% passing the 0.476 cm (No. 4 sieve), 10%–22% pass-
ing the 0.2 cm (No. 10 sieve), 6%–13% passing the 0.042 cm The porous asphalt mixtures presented in Table 1 were prelimi-
(No. 40 sieve), and 3%–6% passing the 0.0074 cm (No. 200 narily assessed through voids characterization and particle loss.
sieve)] previously assessed for application in draining asphalt Additional characterization tests (maximum and bulk specific
concrete (Oliveira 2003). gravity, indirect tensile strength, moisture-induced damage, and
Fig. 4. Recycled aggregate composition: (a) concrete/mortar; (b) ceramic brick; (c) rock/granite/marble; (d) ceramic tile; and (e) other.
concrete (IPR 1999) is 18% to 25%. ASTM D7064/D7064M results are presented in Table S1. The granulometric composition
(ASTM 2013) for open-graded friction course asphalt mixture, significantly influenced the air void percentage regardless of the
on the other hand, requires a percentage of air voids higher than recycled aggregate content. The binder content did not significantly
18%. The mixtures produced without recycled aggregate and influence the air voids percentage in mixtures produced with 0%
GC2 and GC3 complied with the required air voids percentage and 12.5% recycled aggregate. For both recycled aggregate con-
for 4.0%, 4.5%, and 5.0% binder contents. Regarding the mixtures tents, two group means were identified for the granulometric com-
produced with 12.5% recycled aggregate, only GC3 with a 4.5% position (GC1a , GC2b , and GC3b ). For the 25% recycled content,
binder content complied with the required air voids percentage. three group means were identified for the granulometric compo-
Considering the mixtures produced with 25% recycled aggre- sition (GC1a , GC2b , and GC3c ) and two for binder content (4.5%a ,
gate, only those produced with GC3 and 4.5% and 5.0% binder 5%a , and 5.5%b ). Regarding the 37.5% recycled aggregate con-
content complied with the required air voids percentage. For mix- tent, two group means were identified for granulometric compo-
tures produced with 37.5% of recycled content, only that produced sition (GC1a , GC2a;b , and GC3b ) and binder content (5%a , 5.5%a ,
with GC3 and 5% binder content complied with the required air and 6%b ).
voids percentage. The scatter in the air voids content results pre- The air void content alone does not allow a proper hydraulic
sented in Fig. 8 occurred because the air voids content in a permeable conductivity assessment. The air voids’ quality, capillaries’ dimen-
pavement is highly dependent on several factors, including aggregate sions, and interconnected air voids also need to be considered in
texture, aggregate gradation, binder content, and compactive effort porous asphalt pavements (Poulikakos et al. 2006a). Thus, the in-
[ACI Committee 522 (ACI 2010)]. ternal structure characterized by the interconnected air voids con-
The influence of binder content and granulometric composition tent is one of the main mix design and evaluation parameters for
on the air voids content was verified through the ANOVA, whose porous asphalt mixtures (Alvarez et al. 2011; Poulikakos et al.
2006b). The equilibrium density should lead to a total and inter- For 12.5% recycled aggregate content, two mean groups were iden-
connected air voids contents higher than the minimum to guarantee tified for granulometric composition (GC1a , GC2a , and GC3b ) and
the expected functionality but smaller than the maximum that can three for binder content (4%a , 4.5%b , and 5%c ). For 25% recycled
lead to durability problems (Alvarez et al. 2011). aggregate content, two group means were identified for granulo-
Fig. 9 shows that the interconnected air voids content decreased metric composition (GC1a , GC2b , and GC3b ) and two for binder
with higher binder content, which is related to the binder content content (4.5%a , 5%a , and 5.5%b ).
filling empty spaces between the granulates and preventing water The particle loss of porous asphalt mixtures tended to increase
percolation. A minimum of 10% interconnected air voids content with higher recycled aggregate content (Fig. 10). The Brazilian
might not compromise the hydraulic conductivity of the porous as- standard for porous-layer asphalt-polymer concrete (IPR 1999)
phalt concrete mixtures tested in the present paper. Some more specifies a maximum mass loss of 25%, whereas D7064/
restrictive standards requirements might suggest minimum air D7064M (ASTM 2013) for open-graded friction course asphalt
voids and interconnected air voids contents of 22% and 15% for mixture requires a maximum abrasion of 20% for unaged speci-
surface and base courses and 17% and 11% for drainage courses mens. The porous asphalt mixtures complied with the requirements
(Poulikakos et al. 2006a). ACI 522R-10 [ACI Committee 522 (ACI of the Brazilian standard. However, the mixtures produced with
2010)] mentioned that pervious concrete with 20% to 35% of in- 12.5% recycled aggregate, GC1 and GC3, 4% binder content
terconnected voids allows for the rapid passage of water through and 25% recycled aggregate, GC3, and 4.5% binder content did
the body of concrete. not meet the ASTM standard requirements.
The porous asphalt mixtures presented interconnected air voids The porous asphalt mixtures presented mass losses between
between 4.1% and 15.3%. Only mixtures produced with 0% and 5.1% and 23.2%, and for most of the mixtures, the mass loss de-
12.5% of recycled aggregate had more than 10% interconnected creased with higher binder content. The lower mass loss resistance
air voids, regardless of granulometric composition and binder con- of mixtures produced with GC3 was related to the higher percent-
tent. The combination of granulometric composition GC3, 12.5% age of air voids and interconnected air voids.
of recycled aggregate, and 4% binder content presented the highest The influence of binder content and granulometric composition
interconnected air voids percentage (15.3%). The granulometric on the mass loss was verified through the ANOVA, whose results
compositions GC2 and GC3 complied with the minimum of 10% are presented in Table S3. The granulometric composition did not
for recycled aggregate contents of 0%, 12.5%, and 25%, and binder significantly influence the mass losses for 0% and 37.5% recycled
content up to 5%. The granulometric composition GC1 did not aggregate. On the other hand, the binder content influenced the
reach 10% of interconnected air voids for recycled aggregate con- mass loss regardless of the recycled aggregate content. For 0%
tents of 25% and 37.5%. Only the granulometric composition GC3 and 37.5% recycled aggregate contents, two group means were
with a binder ratio of 5% reached the minimum of 10% intercon- identified for binder content (4%a , 4.5%a , and 5%b for 0%; and
nected air voids for 37% of recycled aggregate. 5%a , 5.5%b , and 6%b for 37.5%). For 12.5% recycled aggregate
The influence of binder content and granulometric composition content, two group means were identified for granulometric com-
on the interconnected air voids content was verified through the position (GC1a , GC2a , and GC3b ) and binder content (4%a , 4.5%b ,
ANOVA, whose results are presented in Table S2. The granulomet- and 5%b ). For 25% recycled aggregate content, two group means
ric composition significantly influenced the interconnected air were identified for granulometric composition (GC1a , GC2a , and
voids percentage, except for mixtures produced with 37.5% re- GC3b ) and binder content (4.5%a , 5%b , and 5.5%b ).
cycled aggregate content, whose binder presented two group means Based on the results presented in Figs. 6–10, a comprehensive
(5%a , 5.5%a , and 6%b ). The binder content significantly influenced characterization was performed for the most suitable granulometric
the interconnected air voids content regardless of the recycled ag- composition and optimum binder content determined considering a
gregate content. For 0% recycled aggregate content, two group minimum of 18% air voids and 10% interconnected air voids and a
means were identified for granulometric composition (GC1a , maximum of 25% particle loss. Thus, the full characterization for
GC2b , and GC3b ) and binder content (4%a , 4.5%a , and 5%b ). porous asphalt concrete mixtures produced with granulometric
composition GC3 and binder contents of 4.5% 0.5% (for 0% and The influence of binder and recycled aggregate contents on the
12.5% of recycled aggregate) and 5% 0.5% (for 25% of recycled air voids content was verified through the ANOVA, whose results
aggregate) are presented in Figs. 11–14 and discussed next. The are presented in Table S4. Both binder and recycled aggregate con-
main purpose of the comprehensive characterization was to identify tents significantly influenced the air voids content. Two mean
the minimum binder content that might ensure a suitable hydraulic groups were found for recycled aggregate (0%a , 12.5%a;b , and
conductivity with minimum influence on the mechanical properties 25%b ) and binder (4%a , 4.5%a , 5%a , and 5.5%b ) contents.
and moisture-induced damage (Dumke 2005). The interconnected air voids percentage decreased by increasing
The maximum specific gravity tended to decrease with higher the asphalt binder content. Mixtures with 0% and 12.5% recycled
recycled aggregate content and binder content, as shown in Fig. 11. aggregate presented similar interconnected air voids percentages.
The bulk specific gravity (between 2.01 and 2.09 g=cm3 ) decreased The mixture produced with 25% recycled aggregate and 5.5%
for the intermediate binder content, regardless of the recycled binder content did not reach the reference value of 10%, considered
aggregate content. These results were used to estimate the air voids suitable for not compromising the hydraulic conductivity of the
content, shown in Fig. 12. porous asphalt concrete mixtures.
The air voids results presented in Fig. 12 suggest an optimum The influence of binder and recycled aggregate contents on the
binder content of 4.5% for the porous asphalt mixtures. The higher interconnected air voids content was verified through the ANOVA,
binder content of the mixture produced with 25% recycled concrete whose results are presented in Table S5. The binder and recycled
negatively impacted the percentage of the air voids. A proper aggregate contents significantly influence the interconnected air
binder content might ensure a sufficient film thickness to guarantee voids content. Two mean groups were found for recycled aggregate
porous asphalt durability throughout the pavement lifetime (Chen (0%a , 12.5%a;b , and 25%b ) and binder (4%a , 4.5%a;b , 5%b , and
and Yang 2020). 5.5%c ) contents.
Fig. 13 shows that the particle loss decreases with higher binder strength, as shown in Fig. 14. All tested mixtures attained the mini-
content due to the lower percentage of air voids and the higher mum of 5.50 MPa required for application as porous-layer asphalt-
binder content, resulting in lower susceptibility to disaggregation. polymer concrete (IPR 1999).
On the other hand, the higher particle loss of mixtures produced The influence of binder and recycled aggregate contents on the
with recycled aggregate is related to the low abrasion resistance indirect tensile strength was verified through ANOVA, whose re-
of recycled aggregates. sults are presented in Table S7. Only the recycled aggregate content
The influence of binder and recycled aggregate contents on the significantly influenced the indirect tensile strength. Two mean
particle loss was verified through the ANOVA, whose results are groups were found for the recycled aggregate content (0%a ,
presented in Table S6. The binder and recycled aggregate contents 12.5%b , and 25%b ).
significantly influenced the particle loss. The retained tensile strength results, presented in Fig. 14, reflect
Two mean groups were found for the recycled aggregate content the ability of porous asphalt mixtures to resist moisture-induced
(0%a , 12.5%b , and 25%b ) and three for binder content (4%a , 4.5%a , damage. Due to the large air voids existing in porous asphalt mix-
5%b , and 5.5%c ). tures, the water passing through the pavement surface frequently
The results presented in Fig. 14 demonstrate the influence of air leads to water-related distress (Chen and Wong 2015). The mois-
voids content (Fig. 12) on the indirect tensile strength. The opti- ture susceptibility results indicated possible problems related to
mum binder content of 4.5% resulted in lower indirect tensile aggregate–binder adhesivity that affect pavement performance and,
strength for all tested mixtures. The higher air voids content might therefore, its lifetime. All tested mixtures complied with the mini-
reduce the contact area between aggregate particles, reducing the mum of 80% required by the ASTM standard for open-graded fric-
indirect tensile strength (Hamzah et al. 2010). The increase of tion courses (ASTM 2013). The results presented in Fig. 14 show
recycled aggregate content also decreased the indirect tensile that the retained tensile strength reduced by increasing the recycled
aggregate content.
The influence of binder and recycled aggregate contents on the
retained tensile strength was verified through the ANOVA, whose
results are presented in Table S8. Neither binder nor recycled
aggregate content significantly influenced the retained tensile
strength.
The hydraulic conductivity results indicate how easily water
percolates through the porous asphalt pavement and depends on
the specific application for the mix. If the porous asphalt pavement
will receive runoff from adjacent impervious land cover, the hy-
draulic conductivity needs to be high enough to accommodate
the infiltration requirements. However, if only rainfall and no addi-
tional runoff are considered, the requirements for that particular
mix can be reduced (Putman and Kline 2012). A proper drainage
assessment and an adequate binder content are vital points to im-
proving porous asphalt pavement performance (Chen and Yang
2020).
The results presented in Fig. 15 show that the hydraulic conduc-
tivity of all tested mixtures decreased with the increase of recycled
aggregate and binder content. Apart from the hydraulic conduc-
tivity of the mixture produced with 25% of recycled aggregate
Fig. 13. Particle loss.
and 5.5% of binder content (1.03 mm=s), the results complied with
recommendations of ASTM [1.15 mm=s (ASTM 2013)], ACI tensile strength suggest that the durability of porous asphalt mixtures
{1.35 to 12 mm=s [ACI Committee 522 (ACI 2010)]}, and the depended upon the thickness of the binder film surrounding the ag-
Brazilian standard for permeable pavements [1 mm=s (ABNT gregate particles. However, as the binder content increased and oc-
2015)] mentioned in the section “Hydraulic Conductivity.” Recom- cupied air voids, the hydraulic conductivity reduced (Putman and
mended hydraulic conductivity for urban drainage reported in the Kline 2012). The optimum binder content definition must combine
literature was between 0.01 and 10 mm=s (Bentarzi et al. 2013). a minimum binder content to avoid excessive particle loss and a
The influence of binder and recycled aggregate contents on the maximum binder content to avoid the risk of asphalt draindown
hydraulic conductivity was verified through the ANOVA, whose (Chen and Yang 2020).
results are presented in Table S9. The hydraulic conductivity was In summary, the results show that the tested mixtures presented
significantly affected by the recycled aggregate and binder con- suitable particle loss, tensile strength, and moisture-induced dam-
tents. Three mean groups were found for recycled aggregate (0%a , age for application as porous asphalt mixture for urban stormwater
12.5%b , and 25%c ), and four mean groups were found for binder management. The use of recycled aggregate resulted in acceptable
content (4%a , 4.5%b , 5%c , and 5.5%d ). air voids content only in mixtures produced with 4.5% binder con-
The viability of porous asphalt mixtures for urban stormwater tent. The mixture produced with 25% recycled aggregate and 5.5%
management depends on the equilibrium between functionality binder content did not reach 10% of interconnected air voids and
(hydraulic conductivity and interconnected air voids) and durability presented the lowest hydraulic conductivity (interconnected air
(mass loss and moisture-induced damage) (Putman and Kline voids of 9.54% and hydraulic conductivity of 1.03 mm=s). The re-
2012). Results presented in Figs. 13 and 14 show that as the sults suggest that the porous asphalt mixture produced with gran-
durability increased (high retained tensile strength and low particle ulometric composition GC3, 25% recycled aggregate, and 4.5%
loss), the hydraulic conductivity and the percentage of intercon- asphalt binder could potentially be used for the intended applica-
nected air voids decreased. The results of particle loss and retained tion in stormwater runoff management.
Future studies regarding stone-on-stone contact, aging, dynamic
creep, skid, and rutting resistance (Chen and Wong 2015) might
confirm these findings and attest to the viability of real-scale ap-
plications of porous asphalt with recycled aggregate even for
high-traffic zones. In this context, because permeable pavements
may suffer from several performance issues (Li et al. 2017) due
to the high porosity (concrete loose, pore-clogging, lower strength
and durability, and difficulty in maintenance), future studies might
also include these topics. Finally, investigations about the environ-
mental and cost benefits of permeable pavements, sound energy
dissipation (Afonso et al. 2017), and the ability to combat urban
heat islands (Afonso et al. 2019; Chen and Yang 2020) that occur
in urban areas might also be interesting.
the findings of the present paper contributing to consolidating the PA: ASTM.
Bentarzi, Y., A. Ghenaim, A. Terfous, A. Wanko, F. Feugeas, J. B. Poulet,
use of recycled aggregate as a strategy to implement a circular
and R. Mosé. 2016. “Hydrodynamic behaviour of a new permeable
economy from a sustainable infrastructure perspective. pavement material under high rainfall conditions.” Urban Water J.
13 (7): 687–696. https://doi.org/10.1080/1573062X.2015.1024688.
Bentarzi, Y., A. Terfous, A. Ghenaim, A. Wanko, F. Hlawka, and J. B.
Data Availability Statement Poulet. 2013. “Hydrodynamic characteristics of a new permeable pave-
ment material produced from recycled concrete and organic matter.”
The data supporting the paper findings are available within the Urban Water J. 10 (4): 260–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/1573062X
paper and supplementary file. .2012.727835.
Brasileiro, L. L. 2013. Utilização de agregados reciclados provenientes
de RCD em substituição ao agregado natural no concreto asfáltico.
Acknowledgments Teresina, Brazil: Nature Science Center.
Cantero, B., I. F. Sáez del Bosque, A. Matías, M. I. Sánchez de Rojas, and
This project was partially funded by the National Council for C. Medina. 2019. “Inclusion of construction and demolition waste as a
Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) and CAPES coarse aggregate and a cement addition in structural concrete design.”
Foundation. Arch. Civ. Mech. Eng. 19 (4): 1338–1352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j
.acme.2019.08.004.
Castillo-Rodríguez, J. T., I. Andrés-Doménech, M. Martín, I. Escuder-
Supplemental Materials Bueno, S. Perales-Momparler, and J. Mira-Peidro. 2021. “Quantifying
the impact on stormwater management of an innovative ceramic per-
Tables S1–S9 are available online in the ASCE Library (www meable pavement solution.” Water Resour. Manage. 35 (4): 1251–
1271. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-021-02778-7.
.ascelibrary.org).
Chen, J. S., and C. H. Yang. 2020. “Porous asphalt concrete: A review of
design, construction, performance and maintenance.” Int. J. Pavement Res.
Technol. 13 (6): 601–612. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42947-020-0039-7.
References
Chen, M. J., and Y. D. Wong. 2015. “Porous asphalt mixture with a combi-
AASHTO. 2018. Resistance of compacted asphalt mixtures to moisture- nation of solid waste aggregates.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 27 (6): 04014194.
induced damage. AASHTO T 283. Washington, DC: AASHTO. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001154.
AASHTO. 2021. Theoretical maximum specific gravity (Gmm) and density De Paula Junior, A. C. 2019. Estudo do potencial de aplicação de resíduo
of asphalt mixtures. AASHTO T 209. Washington, DC: AASHTO. de concreto em substituição ao agregado graúdo para concretos
ABNT (Acronym for Brazilian Association for Technical Standards). 2015. permeáveis. Juiz de Fora, Brazil: Dept. of Civil Engineering.
Pavimentos permeáveis de concreto—Requisitos e procedimentos. Dumke, M. P. 2005. Concreto Asfáltico Drenante Com Fibras De Celulose,
NBR 16416. São Paulo, Brazil: ABNT. Ligante Modificado Por Polímero E Asfalto-Borracha. Florianópolis,
ABNT (Associacao Brasileira De Normas Tecnicas). 2004. Agregados Brazil: Dept. of Civil Engineering.
reciclados de resíduos sólidos da construção civil—Utilização em Frigio, F., E. Pasquini, M. N. Partl, and F. Canestrari. 2015. “Use of
pavimentação e preparo de concreto sem função estrutural—Requisitos. reclaimed asphalt in porous asphalt mixtures: Laboratory and field
NBR 15116. São Paulo, Brazil: ABNT. evaluations.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 27 (7): 04014211. https://doi.org/10
ABRELPE (Associação Brasileira de Empresas de Limpeza Pública e .1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001182.
Resíduos Especiais). 2020. Panorama dos resíduos sólidos no Brasil Gautam, P. K., P. Kalla, R. Nagar, and A. S. Jethoo. 2018. “Laboratory
2019. São Paulo, Brazil: ABRELPE. investigation on use of quarry waste in open graded friction course.”
ACI (American Concrete Institute). 2010. Pervious concrete. ACI 522R-10. Resour. Policy 59 (Sep): 62–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol
Farmington Hills, MI: ACI. .2018.02.009.
AFNOR (Association Française de Normalisation). 1993. Mesure de pro- Ghisellini, P., M. Ripa, and S. Ulgiati. 2018. “Exploring environmental and
priétés liées à la perméabilité des matériaux des mélanges economic costs and benefits of a circular economy approach to the con-
hydrocarbonés—Partie 2 : Détermination du pourcentage de vides struction and demolition sector. A literature review.” J. Cleaner Prod.
communicants des matériaux liés. NF P98-254-2. Paris: AFNOR. 178 (Mar): 618–643. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.207.
Afonso, M. L., M. Dinis-Almeida, and C. S. Fael. 2017. “Study of the Guimarães, J. M. F. 2012. Concreto asfáltico drenante em asfaltos mod-
porous asphalt performance with cellulosic fibres.” Constr. Build. Mater. ificados por polímero SBS e borracha moída de pneus. Florianópolis,
135 (Mar): 104–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.12.222. Brazil: Dept. of Civil Engineering.
Afonso, M. L., T. S. Santos, C. S. Fael, and M. Dinis-Almeida. 2019. Hammes, G., L. P. Thives, and E. Ghisi. 2018. “Application of stormwater
“Hydraulic conductivity of the permeable asphalt pavement—Laboratory collected from porous asphalt pavements for non-potable uses in
vs in situ test.” IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 471 (2): 022023. https:// buildings.” J. Environ. Manage. 222 (May): 338–347. https://doi
doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/471/2/022023. .org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.05.094.