Quality Control: Lucila B. Rabuco, PHD
Quality Control: Lucila B. Rabuco, PHD
Primary Goal
the production of high quality data through measurement instruments measurement techniques that are accurate, reliable, & adequate for its intended purpose
Should be accomplished in a cost effective manner under a laboratory quality assurance program with the following objectives:
Objectives:
1. To measure the accuracy and precision of results within and between laboratories. 2. To continuously assess the reliability of data generated by the laboratory. 3. To detect training needs of the laboratory staff.
5. To provide a permanent record of instrument performance as a basis for validating data and projecting repair or replacement needs. 6. To upgrade the overall quality of laboratory performances. 7. To improve record keeping and report generation. 8. To ensure the integrity of the samples submitted to the laboratory. 9. To help ensure that the laboratory results will withstand legal scrutiny in regulatory actions.
5. Durability
6. Serviceability 7. Perceive quality 8. Aesthetics
DEFINITIONS OF QUALITY
1. Quality is a distinctive inherent feature. 2. Quality is a distinguished attribute.
13. Quality is the opposing force to lower cost and higher productivity.
14. Quality is the loss imparted to society by products.
QUALITY CONTROL
Definition Process of monitoring laboratory analyses to ensure accuracy of results.
Quality Assurance Encompasses every aspect of the laboratory operation from patient identification, sample acquisition to the clear reporting of the final laboratory result.
Specificity A measurement of the incidence of negative results in persons known to be free of disease (true negative)
Specificity =
TN
x 100
Sensitivity
A measure of the incidence of positive results in persons known to have a condition ( true positive )
Sensitivity =
TP ( TP + FN )
x 100
Basic quality control involves the analysis of specific control fluids (serum, urine, CSF) at the same time patient samples are analyzed for the constituents of interest
Accuracy
An indication of how close the answer obtained to the true value
Precision
Indicates how close the single values are to one another
marketed commercially or may be prepared in the laboratory; Freeze-dried for long term stability 2 levels : normal range
abnormal range may be obtained either assayed or nonassayed
A set of criteria developed to improve quality of monitoring, decrease subjectivity in data analysis, and provide some help in troubleshooting.
1. (2S) 2. (3S) One control value exceeds
3. 2 (2S) Two consecutive control values exceed the same limit, either 2sd
4. R (4S) The numerical difference between two control values within the same run exceeds 4sd 5. 4 (1S) Four consecutive values (control) exceed either 1sd 6. 10 (x) Ten consecutive results all lie on the same side of the mean
Westgard rules
Definitions (1)
Quality Control - QC refers to the measures that must be included during each assay run to verify that the test is working properly. Quality Assurance - QA is defined as the overall program that ensures that the final results reported by the laboratory are correct. The aim of quality control is simply to ensure that the results generated by the test are correct. However, quality assurance is concerned with much more: that the right test is carried out on the right specimen, and that the right result and right interpretation is delivered to the right person at the right time
Definitions (2)
Quality Assessment - quality assessment (also known as proficiency testing) is a means to determine the quality of the results generated by the laboratory. Quality assessment is a challenge to the effectiveness of the QA and QC programs. Quality Assessment may be external or internal, examples of external programs include NEQAS, HKMTA, and Qprobes.
The educational background and training of the laboratory personnel The condition of the specimens The controls used in the test runs Reagents Equipment The interpretation of the results The transcription of results The reporting of results
Errors in measurement
Accepted true value - the value approximating the true value, the difference between the two values is negligible.
Error - the discrepancy between the result of a measurement and the true (or accepted true value).
Sources of error
Input data required - such as standards used, calibration values, and values of physical constants. Inherent characteristics of the quantity being measured - e.g. CFT and HAI titre. Instruments used - accuracy, repeatability. Observer fallibility - reading errors, blunders, equipment selection, analysis and computation errors.
Environment - any external influences affecting the measurement. Theory assumed - validity of mathematical methods and approximations.
Random Error
An error which varies in an unpredictable manner, in magnitude and sign, when a large number of measurements of the same quantity are made under effectively identical conditions.
Random errors create a characteristic spread of results for any test method and cannot be accounted for by applying corrections. Random errors are difficult to eliminate but repetition reduces the influences of random errors. Examples of random errors include errors in pipetting and changes in incubation period. Random errors can be minimized by training, supervision and adherence to standard operating procedures.
Random Errors
x
x x True Value x x x x x x x x x x x
Systematic Error
An error which, in the course of a number of measurements of the same value of a given quantity, remains constant when measurements are made under the same conditions, or varies according to a definite law when conditions change. Systematic errors create a characteristic bias in the test results and can be accounted for by applying a correction. Systematic errors may be induced by factors such as variations in incubation temperature, blockage of plate washer, change in the reagent batch or modifications in testing method.
Systematic Errors
x x True Value x x x x x x x
Put up the IQC specimen for at least 20 or more assay runs and record down the O.D./cut-off value or antibody titre (whichever is applicable).
Westgard rules
The formulation of Westgard rules were based on statistical methods. Westgard rules are commonly used to analyse data in Shewhart control charts. Westgard rules are used to define specific performance limits for a particular assay and can be use to detect both random and systematic errors. There are six commonly used Westgard rules of which three are warning rules and the other three mandatory rules. The violation of warning rules should trigger a review of test procedures, reagent performance and equipment calibration. The violation of mandatory rules should result in the rejection of the results obtained with patients serum samples in that assay.
Shewhart Chart
100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Antibody Units
+3 sd +2 sd +1 sd
Target value
-1 sd -2 sd -3 sd
16
Warning rules
Warning 12SD : It is violated if the IQC value exceeds the mean by 2SD. It is an event likely to occur normally in less than 5% of cases. Warning 22SD : It detects systematic errors and is violated when two consecutive IQC values exceed the mean on the same side of the mean by 2SD.
Warning 41SD : It is violated if four consecutive IQC values exceed the same limit (mean 1SD) and this may indicate the need to perform instrument maintenance or reagent calibration.
Mandatory rules
Mandatory 13SD : It is violated when the IQC value exceeds the mean by 3SD. The assay run is regarded as out of control.
Mandatory R4SD : It is only applied when the IQC is tested in duplicate. This rule is violated when the difference in SD between the duplicates exceeds 4SD.
Mandatory 10x : This rule is violated when the last 10 consecutive IQC values are on the same side of the mean or target value.
Antibody Units
+3 sd +2 sd +1 sd
Target value
-1 sd -2 sd -3 sd
16
Antibody Units
+3 sd +2 sd +1 sd
Target value
-1 sd -2 sd -3 sd
16
Accept the test run in its entirety - this usually applies when only a warning rule is violated. Reject the whole test run - this applies only when a mandatory rule is violated. Enlarge the greyzone and thus re-test range for that particular assay run - this option can be considered in the event of a violation of either a warning or mandatory rule.