Validity Test grp6 2
Validity Test grp6 2
Validity Test grp6 2
COLLEGE OF EDUCATION
CHED CENTER OF DEVELOPMENT IN TEACHER EDUCATION
Dear expert,
We are conducting a research about the Challenges and Coping Strategies of
Social Studies students in Online Learning Amidst Covid-19 Pandemic among 3rd year
and 4th year Social Studies major of Isabela State University Cabagan Campus. This
survey contains six challenges which includes 6 items per-category and five coping
strategies with 6 items per-category for a total of 66 items.
We need your expert judgment on the degree of relevance of each item to the
measured
domains. Please be guided on the use of the following rating scales:
Degree of Relevance:
1-the item is not relevant to the 3-the item is quite relevant to
the measured category measured category
2-the item is somewhat relevant to the 4-the item is highly relevant to
the measured category measured category
Respectfully Yours,
Relevance
Learning
Environment
Expert in
Items Expert 1 Expert 2 Expert 3 Agreemen I-CVI UA
t
1 3 4 4 4
2 3 3 3 3
3 4 4 4 4
4 3 4 4 4
5 4 3 3 4
6 3 3 3 3
Proportion S-CVI Ave= S-CVI
Relevance UA
Ave=
S-CVI Average
based on
Proportion
relevance=
The number of experts and their implications of the cut-off score of CVI
Number of experts Number of accepted CVI Source of
values Recommendation
Two experts
Three to five experts
Instruction
Indicate your level of agreement on each statement. Please read the statement carefully.
Likert Scale used
5-Strongly Agree, 4 – Agree, 3-Neutral, 2- Disagree, 1-Strongly Disagree
CHALLENGES Your assessment
(Household (Kindly check the column which is appropriate for each item)
Responsibilities) Relevance Comments
(1) (2) (3) (4)
No Item is Item is Item is
relevance somewhat quite highly
at all relevant relevant relevant
Relevance
Household
Responsibility
Expert in
Items Expert 1 Expert 2 Expert 3 Agreemen I-CVI UA
t
1 4 4 4 4
2 3 4 4 3
3 4 3 3 4
4 3 3 3 3
5 4 4 3 4
6 4 4 4 4
Proportion S-CVI Ave= S-CVI
Relevance UA
Ave=
S-CVI Average
based on
Proportion
relevance=
The number of experts and their implications of the cut-off score of CVI
Number of experts Number of accepted CVI Source of
values Recommendation
Two experts
Three to five experts
Indicate your level of agreement on each statement. Please read the statement carefully.
Likert Scale used
5-Strongly Agree, 4 – Agree, 3-Neutral, 2- Disagree, 1-Strongly Disagree
CHALLENGES Your assessment
(Internet Connection) (Kindly check the column which is appropriate for each item)
Relevance Comments
(1) (2) (3) (4)
No Item is Item is Item is
relevance somewhat quite highly
at all relevant relevant relevant
Relevance
Internet
Connections
Expert in
Items Expert 1 Expert 2 Expert 3 Agreemen I-CVI UA
t
1 4 4 4 4
2 4 4 4 4
3 3 4 4 3
4 3 3 3 3
5 3 4 3 4
6
Proportion S-CVI S-
Relevance Ave= CVI
UA
Ave=
S-CVI Average
based on
Proportion
relevance=
The number of experts and their implications of the cut-off score of CVI
Number of experts Number of accepted CVI Source of
values Recommendation
Two experts
Three to five experts
Instruction
Indicate your level of agreement on each statement. Please read the statement carefully.
Likert Scale used
5-Strongly Agree, 4 – Agree, 3-Neutral, 2- Disagree, 1-Strongly Disagree
CHALLENGES Your assessment
(Motivations) (Kindly check the column which is appropriate for each item)
Relevance Comments
(1) (2) (3) (4)
No Item is Item is Item is
relevance somewhat quite highly
at all relevant relevant relevant
Relevance
Motivations
Expert in
Items Expert 1 Expert 2 Expert 3 Agreemen I-CVI UA
t
1 4 3 4
2 4 3 3
3 4 4 4
4 3 3 3
5 4 4 4
6 4 4 3
Proportion S-CVI Ave= S-CVI
Relevance UA
Ave=
S-CVI Average
based on
Proportion
relevance=
The number of experts and their implications of the cut-off score of CVI
Number of experts Number of accepted CVI Source of
values Recommendation
Two experts
Three to five experts
Indicate your level of agreement on each statement. Please read the statement carefully.
Likert Scale used
5-Strongly Agree, 4 – Agree, 3-Neutral, 2- Disagree, 1-Strongly Disagree
CHALLENGES Your assessment
(Financial Issues) (Kindly check the column which is appropriate for each item)
Relevance Comments
(1) (2) (3) (4)
No Item is Item is Item is
relevance somewhat quite highly
at all relevant relevant relevant
1.I have difficult in
attending my online
class for having no
enough money and load
due to my financial
status.
2.My family find
difficulty to support my
online class.
3.Lack of resources
hinders me in my online
class.
4.I use my personal
savings to support my
studies.
5.I cope with the
struggles in my studies
despite of financial
issue.
6. I performed well
despite having financial
problem.
Relevance
Financial Issues
Expert in
Items Expert 1 Expert 2 Expert 3 Agreemen I-CVI UA
t
1 4 4 4 4
2 3 4 3 3
3 3 3 4 3
4 3 3 3 3
5 3 3 4 4
6 4 4 4 4
Proportion S-CVI Ave= S-CVI
Relevance UA
Ave=
S-CVI Average
based on
Proportion
relevance=
The number of experts and their implications of the cut-off score of CVI
Number of experts Number of accepted CVI Source of
values Recommendation
Two experts
Three to five experts
Indicate your level of agreement on each statement. Please read the statement carefully.
Likert Scale used
5-Strongly Agree, 4 – Agree, 3-Neutral, 2- Disagree, 1-Strongly Disagree
CHALLENGES Your assessment
(Mental Health Issues) (Kindly check the column which is appropriate for each item)
Relevance Comments
(1) (2) (3) (4)
No Item is Item is Item is
relevance somewhat quite highly
at all relevant relevant relevant
Relevance
Mental Health
Issues
Expert in
Items Expert 1 Expert 2 Expert 3 Agreemen I-CVI UA
t
1 3 4 4 4
2 3 3 3 3
3 4 3 3 3
4 4 4 4 4
5 4 3 3 3
6 3 4 4 4
Proportion S-CVI Ave= S-CVI
Relevance UA
Ave=
S-CVI Average
based on
Proportion
relevance=
The number of experts and their implications of the cut-off score of CVI
Number of experts Number of accepted CVI Source of
values Recommendation
Two experts
Three to five experts
Indicate your level of agreement on each statement. Please read the statement carefully.
Likert Scale used
5-Strongly Agree, 4 – Agree, 3-Neutral, 2- Disagree, 1-Strongly Disagree
COPING Your assessment
STRATEGIES (Kindly check the column which is appropriate for each item)
(Peer-Group Relevance Comments
Discussion) (1) (2) (3) (4)
No Item is Item is Item is
relevance somewhat quite highly
at all relevant relevant relevant
Relevance
Peer-Group
Discussion
Expert in
Items Expert 1 Expert 2 Expert 3 Agreemen I-CVI UA
t
1 3 3 3 3
2 3 4 3 4
3 4 4 4 4
4 4 4 3 4
5 3 4 4 4
6 4 3 3 3
Proportion S-CVI Ave= S-CVI
Relevance UA
Ave=
S-CVI Average
based on
Proportion
relevance=
The number of experts and their implications of the cut-off score of CVI
Number of experts Number of accepted CVI Source of
values Recommendation
Two experts
Three to five experts
Indicate your level of agreement on each statement. Please read the statement carefully.
Likert Scale used
5-Strongly Agree, 4 – Agree, 3-Neutral, 2- Disagree, 1-Strongly Disagree
COPING Your assessment
STRATEGIES (Kindly check the column which is appropriate for each item)
(Emotional Relevance Comments
Intelligence) (1) (2) (3) (4)
No Item is Item is Item is
relevance somewhat quite highly
at all relevant relevant relevant
Relevance
Emotional
Intelligence
Expert in
Items Expert 1 Expert 2 Expert 3 Agreemen I-CVI UA
t
1 3 3 4 4
2 4 4 4 4
3 3 4 3 3
4 4 4 4 3
5 4 3 3 4
6 4 4 4 3
Proportion S-CVI Ave= S-CVI
Relevance UA
Ave=
S-CVI Average
based on
Proportion
relevance=
The number of experts and their implications of the cut-off score of CVI
Number of experts Number of accepted CVI Source of
values Recommendation
Two experts
Three to five experts
Indicate your level of agreement on each statement. Please read the statement carefully.
Likert Scale used
5-Strongly Agree, 4 – Agree, 3-Neutral, 2- Disagree, 1-Strongly Disagree
COPING Your assessment
STRATEGIES (Kindly check the column which is appropriate for each item)
(Maintaining Social Relevance Comments
Connection) (1) (2) (3) (4)
No Item is Item is Item is
relevance somewhat quite highly
at all relevant relevant relevant
Relevance
Maintaining
Social
Connection
Expert in
Items Expert 1 Expert 2 Expert 3 Agreemen I-CVI UA
t
1 4 4 4 4
2 4 3 3 3
3 4 4 4 4
4 3 3 3 3
5 4 4 4 4
6 4 3 4 3
Proportion S-CVI Ave= S-CVI
Relevance UA
Ave=
S-CVI Average
based on
Proportion
relevance=
The number of experts and their implications of the cut-off score of CVI
Number of experts Number of accepted CVI Source of
values Recommendation
Two experts
Three to five experts
Indicate your level of agreement on each statement. Please read the statement carefully.
Likert Scale used
5-Strongly Agree, 4 – Agree, 3-Neutral, 2- Disagree, 1-Strongly Disagree
COPING Your assessment
STRATEGIES (Kindly check the column which is appropriate for each item)
(Developing Routines) Relevance Comments
(1) (2) (3) (4)
No Item is Item is Item is
relevance somewhat quite highly
at all relevant relevant relevant
1.Having a routine
allows me to get back a
sense of control over my
life and my online
study.
2.Building a routine can
help boost my self-
confidence to do school
works.
3. Establishing a daily
routine is important to
best handle the situation
mostly in my online
learning.
4.I need to manage my
time between learning
and my responsibilities.
5.I improve my
knowledge about
technologies needed in
my online study.
6.I try my best to learn
about technologies
needed in my online
study.
Relevance
Developing
Routines
Expert in
Items Expert 1 Expert 2 Expert 3 Agreemen I-CVI UA
t
1 4 4 4 4
2 4 3 4 3
3 4 4 3 4
4 4 4 4 4
5 3 3 4 3
6 3 3 3 3
Proportion S-CVI Ave= S-CVI
Relevance UA
Ave=
S-CVI Average
based on
Proportion
relevance=
The number of experts and their implications of the cut-off score of CVI
Number of experts Number of accepted CVI Source of
values Recommendation
Two experts
Three to five experts
Indicate your level of agreement on each statement. Please read the statement carefully.
Likert Scale used
5-Strongly Agree, 4 – Agree, 3-Neutral, 2- Disagree, 1-Strongly Disagree
COPING Your assessment
STRATEGIES (Kindly check the column which is appropriate for each item)
(Maintaining Good Relevance Comments
Health) (1) (2) (3) (4)
No Item is Item is Item is
relevance somewhat quite highly
at all relevant relevant relevant
Relevance
Maintaining
Good Health
Expert in
Items Expert 1 Expert 2 Expert 3 Agreemen I-CVI UA
t
1 4 4 4 4
2 4 4 4 4
3 3 3 4 3
4 3 4 4 4
5 4 4 4 4
6 3 3 4 3
Proportion S-CVI Ave= S-CVI
Relevance UA
Ave=
S-CVI Average
based on
Proportion
relevance=
The number of experts and their implications of the cut-off score of CVI
Number of experts Number of accepted CVI Source of
values Recommendation
Two experts
Three to five experts