JAKO201512359858231
JAKO201512359858231
JAKO201512359858231
1)
[ Abstract ]
Sittaung-Thanlwin region in Lower Myanmar is an ecological
niche for human settlement. Evidences of human activities
in the region are seen through various archaeological sites
or settlements along the coastal area between the rivers
Sittaung and Thanlwin (Salween). In Lower Myanmar, scholar,
U Aung Myint, discovered one major site Kyaikkatha and
other small scale sites, namely, Sittaung, Kawhtin, Kadaikgyi,
Kadaikkalay, Katkadit, Kelatha (little Zothoke), Ayetthama,
Winka, Zothoke (big Zothoke), Lagonbyi (Sampannago), Wagaru,
Laming and Ye in present day Mon State. In 1980, U Aung
Myint undertook an exploration program at Kyaikkatha. After
the exploration, an excavation team conducted systematic
digging at Kyaikkatha in March 1986. Excavation continued
occasionally at Kyaikkatha throughout the years between
1995 and 2000. It is known that Kyaikkatha, the old city,
reveals a kind of monumental civilization exposing four
religious structures (a stupa and three monasteries). This
essay looks into the distribution of features within Kyaikkatha
and infers on its social, political, and religious organization.
157
SUVANNABHUMI Vol. 7 No. 1 (June 2015) 157-186.
Ⅰ. Introduction
158
❙ A Study on Kyaikkatha ❙
159
SUVANNABHUMI Vol. 7 No. 1 (June 2015) 157-186.
160
❙ A Study on Kyaikkatha ❙
Ⅱ. Background History
161
SUVANNABHUMI Vol. 7 No. 1 (June 2015) 157-186.
162
❙ A Study on Kyaikkatha ❙
1) The name Kyaikkatha comes from Mon words KyākAssa; (Kyāk= pagoda; Assa:=a
legendary hero of Hanthawaddy – Bago Mon Kingdom) meaning the Pagoda of
Prince Assa who was born and who had grown up in the frontier area between
Bago and Muttama (Martaban). There is an ancient Pagoda (ceti) called KyākAssa
at the South-west corner of the old-town, which suggests why the town was
named Assa; this still exists in Mon; village in Mon. Later the new Myanmar
settlers called it in their language as Kyaikkatha. In the list of Hanthawaddy
32 Myos (town sites), it is mentioned as Katha-SittaungMyo, adjoining a
nearby town site located on the east bank of River Sittaung.
163
SUVANNABHUMI Vol. 7 No. 1 (June 2015) 157-186.
164
❙ A Study on Kyaikkatha ❙
Tun 2001: 17-18). That explains why they had put up scattered
forts on the north, east and south of this city.
Typologically, Kyaikkatha and Thaton are the biggest ones
in the region, Zothoke (by combing the bigger Zokthoke and the
smaller Zokthoke-Kyaikhtisaung), Sanpanango, Sittaung and Ye are
medium in size. The rest are smaller. Their patterns are also
varied; they may be built in circular form, or may be in oblong
with rounded corners - sometimes, one is bigger than another,
some rectangular in shapes. This rectangular shape may be seen
in the middle part of the bigger oblong ones.
< Figure 4> Comparison Kyaikkatha Old City Plan with Others
Neighboring Town Sites
165
SUVANNABHUMI Vol. 7 No. 1 (June 2015) 157-186.
166
❙ A Study on Kyaikkatha ❙
[Kyaikkatha] [Pyu]
[U – Thoung]
Source: After San Win 2000 (A report on visit to U Thoung Suphanburi Province)
167
SUVANNABHUMI Vol. 7 No. 1 (June 2015) 157-186.
2.2 Topography
2) F.M.B is Finger Marked Brick. F.M.B here means artifact which is marking on the
burnt brick.
168
❙ A Study on Kyaikkatha ❙
Ⅲ. Archaeological Observation
3.1 Exploration
In recent years archaeologists have become increasingly aware
that a whole process of cultural formation shaped both the way
finds came to be buried and what happened to them after they
were buried. They also tried to distinguish between process of
cultural formation and non-cultural or natural formation processes
and their transformations. In discovering archaeological sites and
features, they used the Reconnaissance Survey Method in locating
sites and in reconstructing the full human use of the landscape.
They sought to study settlement patterns and the distribution of
sites across the landscape within a given region. This entailed
the exploration of the whole region, involving a survey program
(Renfrew and Bahn 2004: 56-78). In the last few decades, surveys
have developed from being simply a preliminary stage in field
work (for instance, in looking for appropriate sites to excavate) to
a more or less independent kind of inquiry, an area of research
in its own right which can produce information quite different
from that achieved by digging. In some cases excavation may not
take place at all, for example, due to permit issues, or because
of the lack of time or funds excavation. Survey is cheap, quick,
relatively nondestructive, and requires only maps, compasses, and
tapes. Usually, however, archaeologists deliberately choose a surface
approach as a source of regional data in order to investigate
specific questions that interest them which excavations could not
reveal (Renfrew and Bahn 2004: 78-82).
Reconnaissance survey encompasses a broad range of
techniques: it no longer just offers the identification of sites and
the recording or collection of surface artifacts, but also enables
the study of spatial distribution of human activities, variation between
regions, changes in population through time, and relationships
between people, land, and resources (Renfrew and Bahn 2004:
82). Since surface survey has vital place in archaeological work,
and continues to grow in importance, it is usually supplemented (and
often preceded) by reconnaissance from the air, one of the most
important advances made by archaeology this century. The
169
SUVANNABHUMI Vol. 7 No. 1 (June 2015) 157-186.
170
❙ A Study on Kyaikkatha ❙
171
SUVANNABHUMI Vol. 7 No. 1 (June 2015) 157-186.
3) According to San Win, the original carving of the four faces was covered with
modern cement by villagers and made it look like a modern monk’s faces.
172
❙ A Study on Kyaikkatha ❙
173
SUVANNABHUMI Vol. 7 No. 1 (June 2015) 157-186.
old city has no village but a bare laterite high ground where
laterite quarry pits are numerous. On one of their exploration
trips U Aung Myint and his colleagues found two small
sculptures; one made of terracotta and another one made of
stone. Both represented horse-riding. The terracotta carving, is a
fragment, and has a fully-dressed man riding a horse. He wore a
princely garment (San Win 1986: 74-76) (See Figure 10).
<Figure 10> Fragment of Terracotta Carving Found at Kyaikkatha,
Depicting a Man Riding a Horse
174
❙ A Study on Kyaikkatha ❙
3.3 Excavation
The Department of Archaeology has conducted excavation at
seven sites (K.K.T-1 to 7) within Kyaikkatha.Kyaikkatha excavated
mound K.K.T.1 is a rectangular brick structure, with three big
rooms and nine small rooms, measuring (100 feet x 50 feet) (See
Figure 12).
175
SUVANNABHUMI Vol. 7 No. 1 (June 2015) 157-186.
A big room (hall no.1) measures 27½ feet x 13½ feet, while
the small rooms average to 12 feet x 10 feet. The burnt bricks
are large, 18" x 9" x 3" in sizes, while the small ones measures
12" x 6½" x 2". Most of the bricks have finger-marked lines
indicating that this structure may be traced to the pre-Bagan or
Pyu period. In some part of the brick courses use laterite bricks
at the base level, while some laterite bricks are shaped like the
Kalasa pot. Small terracotta votive tablets (four complete, six
broken and 13 incomplete) are unearthed from this brick structure
(K.K.T.1). The four complete votive tablets are comparable to that
of U Mya's votive tablets part 1 figures 58 , 59 and 112 showing
a type of Buddha-gaya with a sikhara mounted on top of the
sitting Buddha (See Figure 13). Another religious artifact is a
torso of terracotta Buddha sitting on a low pedestal. The left arm
of this statue is also broken. The body measures two feet and
one inch in height and similar to Bagan period’s Buddha statues,
176
❙ A Study on Kyaikkatha ❙
177
SUVANNABHUMI Vol. 7 No. 1 (June 2015) 157-186.
4) The excavation were conducted by U Myo Min Kyaw for the first half of the
season. Daw Ngwe Ngwe Soe handled the second half of the season.
178
❙ A Study on Kyaikkatha ❙
179
SUVANNABHUMI Vol. 7 No. 1 (June 2015) 157-186.
180
❙ A Study on Kyaikkatha ❙
181
SUVANNABHUMI Vol. 7 No. 1 (June 2015) 157-186.
5) Except for K.K.T-4 and 5 which are of testing pits. Another brick structure (K.K.T-6)
is not mentioned in the excavation reports.
182
❙ A Study on Kyaikkatha ❙
183
SUVANNABHUMI Vol. 7 No. 1 (June 2015) 157-186.
Ⅳ. Conclusion
184
❙ A Study on Kyaikkatha ❙
References
185
SUVANNABHUMI Vol. 7 No. 1 (June 2015) 157-186.
Received: Mar. 30, 2015; Reviewed: June. 23 2015; Accepted: June 25, 2015
186