Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 57 views

    Science Inquiry Rubric

    Uploaded by

    Pasheena Ramathas
    The rubric evaluates student science investigations across several criteria from "Meets Standard" to "Beginning to Meet Standard" to "Doesn't Yet Meet Standard". It assesses how well students form testable questions, make predictions, design experiments, collect and analyze data, draw conclusions, and communicate their process and findings. Key aspects examined include identifying variables, developing logical hypotheses, conducting systematic tests with accurate measurements, using evidence to analyze results, and explaining outcomes with proper scientific language and resources.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Science Inquiry Rubric

    Uploaded by

    Pasheena Ramathas
    57 views1 page
    The rubric evaluates student science investigations across several criteria from "Meets Standard" to "Beginning to Meet Standard" to "Doesn't Yet Meet Standard". It assesses how well students form testable questions, make predictions, design experiments, collect and analyze data, draw conclusions, and communicate their process and findings. Key aspects examined include identifying variables, developing logical hypotheses, conducting systematic tests with accurate measurements, using evidence to analyze results, and explaining outcomes with proper scientific language and resources.

    Original Description:

    Loved this rubric as it may help teachers to feedback on student's level of investigation skills.

    Original Title

    Science-Inquiry-rubric

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The rubric evaluates student science investigations across several criteria from "Meets Standard" to "Beginning to Meet Standard" to "Doesn't Yet Meet Standard". It assesses how well students form testable questions, make predictions, design experiments, collect and analyze data, draw conclusions, and communicate their process and findings. Key aspects examined include identifying variables, developing logical hypotheses, conducting systematic tests with accurate measurements, using evidence to analyze results, and explaining outcomes with proper scientific language and resources.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    57 views1 page

    Science Inquiry Rubric

    Uploaded by

    Pasheena Ramathas
    The rubric evaluates student science investigations across several criteria from "Meets Standard" to "Beginning to Meet Standard" to "Doesn't Yet Meet Standard". It assesses how well students form testable questions, make predictions, design experiments, collect and analyze data, draw conclusions, and communicate their process and findings. Key aspects examined include identifying variables, developing logical hypotheses, conducting systematic tests with accurate measurements, using evidence to analyze results, and explaining outcomes with proper scientific language and resources.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 1

    Science Inquiry/Investigation Rubric

    Criteria Meets Standard Beginning to Meet Standard Doesn’t Yet Meet Standard
    Asks “testable” questions Poses questions based on Asks questions that may or may
    based on observations; re- observations. Identifies one not relate to observations. Does
    states untestable questions. Variable. Does not consistently not identify a variable. Does not
    Identifies variables. distinguish between questions distinguish between questions
    Questioning Distinguishes between that can be answered through that can be answered through
    questions that can be observation, experiments, and observation, experiments, and
    answered through research. research.
    observation, experiments,
    and research.
    Uses logical inferences to Uses logic to make a prediction Not yet able to generate a
    predict what may happen or but does not relate it to evidence. hypothesis or logical prediction.
    Predicting &
    be observed or provides a
    Hypothesizing
    reasonable hypothesis
    related to evidence.
    Student can create a plan Student can develop a fair test Student cannot yet develop a
    for a fair test that identifies that includes some of the fair test.
    what they will observe and elements of a fair test.
    Designing an
    measure, includes a
    Experiment/
    materials list and sequential
    Investigation
    steps, and describes
    variables and how all but
    one will be kept constant.
    Follows a plan for the Follows a plan for the Does not follow the plan for the
    investigation. Records all investigation. Records some data investigation. Records some
    data systematically and but not always systematically or data, but not systematically or
    accurately. Records accurately. Records observations accurately. Records some
    observations of similarities but not always similarities and observations. Does not always
    Investigating and differences. Chooses differences. Chooses appropriate choose appropriate
    appropriate measurements measurements but doesn’t always measurements. Draws
    and measures accurately. measure accurately. Draws scientifically, but not with many
    Draws scientifically with scientifically with proper details.
    proper perspective and with perspective and with details as
    details as necessary. necessary.
    Represents data using Represents data using graphs, Does not represent data in an
    graphs, charts, and tables. charts and tables, but may not organized manner. Analyzes
    Analyzes data based on have chosen appropriate ones. data but does not base analysis
    Analyzing and evidence and results of the Analyzes data based on evidence on results/evidence. Explains
    Explaining Data, investigation. Explains data and results of the investigation. data but does not use scientific
    Drawing using scientific terminology. Explains data using some terminology. Does not use
    Conclusions Uses resources to support scientific terminology. Uses resources to support
    explanation. Identifies resources to support explanation. explanation. Cannot identify
    problems/flaws with the Cannot identify problems/flaws problems/flaws with the
    experimental design. with the experimental design. experimental design.
    Considers audience in Communicates a general Communication about
    selecting what and how to description of their plan and investigation lacks key
    communicate. findings, but omits details about components, clarity, and detail.
    Communicating Communicates questions, the data collection and analysis
    Investigations investigation plan, data process. Is challenged to critique
    and Results collection and analysis, and investigation.
    conclusions with accuracy
    and clarity. Critiques own
    investigation and others.

    Adapted from a rubric created for the “Journey North” website, Annenberg Media 1997 -2007

    You might also like