Nitronic 50 Steel
Nitronic 50 Steel
Nitronic 50 Steel
ISSN 1301-4048 | e-ISSN 2147-835X | Period Bimonthly | Founded: 1997 | Publisher Sakarya University |
http://www.saujs.sakarya.edu.tr/en/
How to cite
Ersan MERTGENÇ; (2020), Examination of Wear and Rockwell-C Adhesion Properties
of Nitronic 50 Steel Coated with Pack Boriding Method. Sakarya University
Journal of Science, 24(3), 521-530, DOI:
https://doi.org/10.16984/saufenbilder.659782
Access link
http://www.saujs.sakarya.edu.tr/en/issue/52472/659782
Ersan MERTGENÇ*1
Abstract
The Nitronic 50 steel is a nitrogen containing stainless steel, which has a high corrosion
resistance, and high strength but its surface resistance against wear is low, making it extremely
limited to use in areas subject to wear. In this study, in order to improve the material surface
and to investigate its effect on tribological properties, boronizing process was carried out by
used pack boriding method at 850 ° C, 900 ° C and 950 ° C for 4 hours. As a result of coating
process, the boride layer has a smooth and flat structure in SEM investigations, the coating
thickness varies between 9 µm and 36 µm and the boride layer thickness increases with
increasing temperature. While the hardness of the uncoated material was around 250 HV0.05,
the surface hardness of the material reached up to 1.712 HV0.05 with the coating process and
increased about 7 times. According to XRD analysis, the surface of the coating layer consisted
of phases FeB, CrB, Ni3B, Fe2B, Cr2B and MnB. Wear behavior was performed by ball-on-disk
wear test in dry environment. The friction coefficient and wear rate decreases with increasing
temperature, while the wear resistance is increased by 20 times compared to unboronized
sample. When the wear tracks were examined, the uncoated Nitronic 50 had an adhesive wear
mechanism, on the other hand the boronized samples had an adhesive and abrasive wear
mechanism together. The Rockwell-C adhesion test was carried out under a load of 1.471 N
and the resulting surface damages were evaluated according to the quality map. Boronized steel
at 850 °C is defined as HF3 type, at 900 °C and 950 °C at boronized steel it is defined as HF4
type and adhesion is acceptable.
*
Corresponding Author: ersanmertgenc@hotmail.com
1
Department of Railway Systems, Afyon Vocational High School, Afyon Kocatepe University, Afyonkarahisar,
Turkey. ORCID: 0000-0001-8247-2922
Ersan MERTGENÇ
Examination of Wear and Rockwell-C Adhesion Properties of Nitronic 50 Steel Coated with Pack Boriding...
850 °C 13 µm, 900 °C 29 µm and 950 °C 36 µm. According to xrd analysis, FeB, CrB, Ni3B, Fe2B,
It is observed that an increase in the boride layer Cr2B and MnB phases were formed on the surface
thickness is caused by the change in the process of the material depending on the process
temperature for a treatment time of 4 h. This is temperature. FeB and CrB phases increase with
due to the fact that the substrate material has high increasing temperature in boronizing treatment.
alloying elements, especially chromium and The reason for this is that the diffusion process is
nickel. accelerated with increasing temperature and the
layer thickness increases. Due to the high amount
of alloying elements such as Mn, Mo, Cr and Ni
in Nitronic 50 steel, different phases were
obtained due to these elements. The
microstructure and the mechanical properties of
the boronized material depend largely on the
chemical composition of the material, the
boriding temperature and the boriding time [38].
It is the reason why chromium based phases settle
in dominant peaks due to the chemical
composition of the material. On the other hand,
the presence of FeB phase as the dominant peak
Figure 3. Zones of the coating layer of boronized in iron-based peaks is close to the surface, while
Nitronic-50 steel for 950 ° C and 4 hours Fe2B phase settles between FeB phase and matrix
[35, 39, 40]. The coexistence of the CrB and FeB
When the figure 3 is examined, it is seen that there peaks is due to the fact that these phases are very
are 3 zones in coated Nitronic 50 steel; zone 1: difficult to distinguish due to their similar
coating layer FeB/CrB and composed of rich Fe, structure [41].
B, Cr, Ni alloys, zone 2: diffusion zone with
higher hardness than matrix but lower hardness 3.3. Hardness of Boride Layer
than boride layer, zone 3: steel matrix free of
boron [36, 37]. Micro-hardness measurements were performed
from cross-sectional area from surface to matrix
3.2. X-Ray Diffraction Analysis
(figure 5).
sample, while abrasive wear is seen in both the boring at 850 °C (figure 7 (a)) and it is compatible
adhesive and abrasive wear by boring samples with HF3 according to the quality map. In
repeatedly cutting the coating surface by friction samples boronized at 900 °C (figure 7 (b)) and
pairs. The width of the wear tracks ranges from 950 °C (figure 7 (c)), delamination occurs along
1.400 µm to 320 µm and when the tracks are with radial cracks around the indentation craters
examined, it is seen that the largest wear tracks and the amount of delemination increases with
and damages such as smearing (plastic increasing boronizing temperature. This is due to
deformation) in the wear direction are non- the increase at the process temperature and the
boronized specimen (figure 6 (a)) and the depth of the hard and brittle structure FeB phase.
narrowest wear tracks are boronized at 950 °C However, the images of samples according to the
(figure 6 (d)), the highest temperature used for 4 quality test were identified as HF4 and represent
hours in the experiment. With the reduction of sufficient adhesion.
boride layer thickness, wear marks become more
deeper [53]. 4. CONCLUSIONS
adhesive and abrasive wear types are seen stainless steel,” Wear, vol. 267, pp. 99-103,
together. 2009.
• In the Rockwell-C adhesion test, the [6] A. M. Ritter and M. F. Henry, “Phase
boronized sample at 850 °C represents HF3 transformations during aging of a nitrogen-
according to the quality map, while the 900 °C strengthened austenitic stainless steel,”
and 950 °C samples were damaged in the HF4 Metallurgical Transactions A, vol. 16,
type. Adhesion for coating is acceptable. pp.1759–1771, 1985.
characterization of DLC coating by in-situ Coatings Technology, vol. 193, pp. 309– 313,
duplex plasma nitriding and arc ion plating,” 2015.
Diamond & Related Materials, vol. 98, pp.
107473, 2019. [21] E. Mertgenc, O. F. Kesici and Y. Kayali,
“Investigation of wear properties of borided
[14] E. Marin, A. Lanzutti, M. Nakamura, M. austenitic stainless-steel different
Zanocco, W. Zhu, G. Pezzotti and F. temperatures and times,” Materials Research
Andreatta, “Corrosion and scratch resistance Express, vol. 6, pp. 076420, 2019.
of DLC coatings applied on chromium
molybdenum steel,” Surface and Coatings [22] İ. Türkmen, E. Yalamaç and M. Keddam,
Technology, vol. 378, pp. 124944, 2019. “Investigation of tribological behaviour and
diffusion model of Fe2B layer formed by
[15] H. Cicek, “Wear behaviors of pack-boriding on SAE 1020 steel,” Surface
TiN/TiCN/DLC composite coatings in and Coatings Technology, vol. 377, pp.
different environments,” Ceramics 124888, 2019.
International, vol. 44, pp. 4853–4858, 2018.
[23] J. Ballinger, S. A. Catledge, “Metal-boride
[16] H. Kovacı, O. Baran, A. F. Yetim, Y. B. interlayers for chemical vapor deposited
Bozkurt, L. Kara and A. Çelik, “The friction nanostructured NSD films on 316 and 440C
and wear performance of DLC coatings stainless steel,” Surface & Coatings
deposited on plasma nitrided AISI 4140 steel Technology, vol. 261, pp. 244–252, 2015.
by magnetron sputtering under air and
vacuum conditions,” Surface & Coatings [24] A. Bartkowska, A. Pertek, M. Kulka and L.
Technology, vol. 349, pp. 969–979, 2018. Klimek, “Laser surface modification of
boronickelized medium carbon steel,” Optics
[17] C. Jaoul, C. Dublanche-Tixier, O, Jarry, P. & Laser Technology, vol. 74, pp. 145–157,
Tristant, J. P. Lavoute, L. Kilman, M. Colas, 2015.
E. Laborde and H. Ageorges, “Tribological
properties of hard a-C:H:F coatings,” Surface [25] O. Torun, “Boriding of nickel aluminide,”
& Coatings Technology, vol. 237, pp. 328– Surface & Coatings Technology, vol. 202,
332, 2013. pp. 3549–3554, 2008.
[19] S. Li, S. Hu, A. C. Hee and Y. Zhao, “Surface [27] O. Ozdemir, M. A. Omar, M. Usta, S. Zeytin,
modification of a Ti2AlC soft ceramic by C. Bindal and A. H. Ucisik, “An investigation
plasma nitriding treatment,” Surface and on boriding kinetics of AISI 316 stainless
Coatings Technology, vol. 281, pp. 164–168, steel,” Vacuum, vol. 83, pp. 175–179, 2009.
2015.
[28] N. Vidakis, A. Antoniadis and N. Bilalis,
[20] M. Tsujikawa, N. Yamauchi, N. Ueda, T. “The VDI 3198 indentation test evaluation of
Sone and Y. Hirose, “Behavior of carbon in a reliable qualitative control for layered
low temperature plasma nitriding layer of compounds,” Journal of Materials Processing
austenitic stainless steel,” Surface & Technology, vol. 143–144, pp. 481–485,
2003.