Container Handbook 3
Container Handbook 3
Container Handbook 3
1 Container design
A container user should be aware of the most important structural differences between
containers, so that he/she is in a position to make appropriate prepa rations for packing
and cargo securing and correctly to assess container loading capacity.
Problem-free dispatch has been assisted by the standardization of transport units, such as
containers, while the standardization of certain components and some dim ensions permits
the use of standard handling equipment and means of transport.
We will describe fundamental components and designs first of all with reference to
standard box containers. More detailed information is given under the heading "C ontainer
types".
The load-carrying element of all box containers is a steel framework, consisting of four
corner posts and two bottom side rails, two top side rails, two bottom cross members, a
front top end rail and a door header.
Additional bottom cross members are fitted between the bottom side rails, to serve as
supports for the floor covering.
Side walls End walls
Roof panel
The side and end walls and the roof are the components of a standard box container which
are capable of bearing the least load. To a certain degree, this naturally also depends on
the construction materials used for them.
The following three Figures illustrate the essential components of standard box containers.
Not included by name are, for example, the door bar handles, the locking components
required for sealing, etc. Where necessary, descriptions of and comments about these
components are provided at other points in the Handbook.
Essential components of a container
In the early days of container shipping, the majority of containers were constructed
according to ASA standards, but now the containers used for maritime transport are
almost without exception ISO containers.
They differ both in dimension and in the shape of the corner fittings or "corner castings".
Most ASA containers, i.e. containers like those used by Sealand constructed according to
"American Standards Association" standards, have since been adapted to match ISO
dimensions. To simplify handling, special universal spreaders were used, which could
handle both types without difficulty.
ISO standard 1161 specifies different shapes for top and bottom and mirror images for
right and left.
Cargo handling
Securing on a chassis
On larger container ships, the containers are stowed nine to twelve high in the hold. In
such cases, the containers loaded must either be only partly full or designed to have
greater stackability. The latter is generally the case with modern containers, but it is
possible to use fold-out flaps in the cell guides, which subdivide the stacks.
Irrespective of the material used to build a box container, it is essential for it to be spray-
tight.
In standard box containers, the load-carrying parts are made of steel profiles, i.e. at least
the entire frame including the bottom cross members and possibly also the elements
serving as reinforcements, such as bottom side ra ils in the area of the gooseneck tunnel
etc. Three main types of material are used for the walls and roof:
steel container
aluminum container
plywood container
In steel sheet containers, a wide range of differently profiled corrugated steel sheet may
be used for the outer walls. It is protected against corrosion by painting or similar
processes.
The cost advantages of this type of container have led to its current dominance. Of all the
containers currently in use, a rough estimate would suggest that 85% are made of steel
sheet.
Aluminum containers are built either with a pure aluminum skin or with a plywood inner
lining; they may also either be riveted or with a smooth or lightly riveted finish.
In plywood containers, the outer walls are made of plywood coated with glass fiber -
reinforced plastic (GRP). Plywood is a popular material for "coffee containers".
It is clear from these examples that containers are not generally made from a single
material but various material combinations, here including steel, aluminum and plywood.
The information even covers the type of preservatives used.
Wood treatment
information
Special impregnation against insect or other pests is required for certain regions of
service. Most container floors or wooden parts undergo preventive treatment.
Wood treatment
information
Materials
used for a flatrack
Box containers are predominantly provided with coverings of plywood or textured coated
board mostly 25 mm thick, more rarely 30 mm thick. Although wood is relatively
expensive, it has substantial advantages over other materials: it is strong and resilient,
does not dent, may be easily replaced during repairs and, when appropriately finished,
has an adequate coefficient of friction. The latter does not apply to the virtually new
container in the left-hand Figure, which has a mirror-bright finish.
Cross-section through a
seven-ply plywood board
Planking is preferred for flatracks and other similar platform containers. 20' platforms or
half-height open-top containers often have a floor of steel, e.g. of "tear drop" or otherwise
textured sheet.
The floors of ISO containers have to be capable of bearing the evenly distributed payload,
the emphasis being on "evenly distributed".
The following test criteria apply where ground conveyors have access to container
floors.
Axle load 12,040 lbs / 5,460 kg
Wheel load 2,730 kg
C ontact surface per wheel 142 cm²
Wheel width 180 mm
Wheel gage 760 mm
The wheel contact area of 142 cm² corresponds approximately to the size of a postcard.
Forklift trucks with a load-carrying capacity of 2 metric tons have axle loads of just under
5 metric tons when loaded. Most 2.5 metric ton forklifts are within the admissible range .
However, some electrically operated 2.5 metric ton forklift trucks reach front axle loads of
over 6,000 kg when loaded. It is of course possible for even heavier forklift trucks to drive
into containers, provided they are not fully loaded and the equipme nt and cargo
dimensions allow it. It is essential to note that add-ons reduce the load-carrying capacity
of forklifts, but increase the front axle load. Goods may only be stacked in box containers
using equipment with a suitable telescopic mast. Using equipment with twin tires may
reduce the wheel loads, but it doesn't completely resolve the issue of axle load. It
shouldn't therefore be regarded as a license to use heavier equipment.
The strength of ISO containers is laid down in the relevant DIN standards and/or the
International C onvention for Safe C ontainers:
ISO containers must be capable of absorbing the horizontal forces arising during regular
service at the level of the end frames.
Longitudinal loading
capacity in the floor
area
C ontainers must withstand loads in the lengthwise direction which correspond to external
acceleration of 2 g acting horizontally on the floor fastening elements. This takes into
account loads which are transmitted via twist locks and other vehicle locking elements to
containers. Special railroad container cars with hydraulic shock absorption limit forces to 2
g; examples of these cars are Lgjs, Sgjs and S gjkmmns cars and other cars with a j in
their name, the j indicating high-performance (long-stroke) shock absorbers or buffers.
Since the values for end and side walls are valid only for large -area loads, any point
loading of the walls should be avoided. Because the weight-carrying capacity of many
general purpose containers is not fully utilized, loading is kept below the maximum values
in the case of compact and even packing. However, if the rate of utilization is high and/or
uneven, countermeasures must be taken.
Some containers are fitted with forklift pockets for handling with ground conveyors.
Appropriate regulations relating to the required dimensions may be found in appendix C of
ISO 1496/1. The pockets are cavities formed crosswise in the floor structure and allow
insertion of the forks from the side; the forks must be pushed fully into the pockets. Forks
which are too short must under no circumstances be used for lifting, since they may cause
damage to the floor.
Unmarked forklift
pockets on a box
container.
The forklift pockets generally only allow handling of empty containers. Packed containers
must not be picked up in this way unless specifically permitted. This is not the case here;
hence, the container may only be picked up with forks when empty.
Forklift pockets on a
flatrack marked
EMPTY
For the most part, no marking is provided or no explicit instruction is given to pick up only
empty containers, missing. To rule out errors, marking should be made a requirement.
The containers shown here merely bear the marking "Tare" at the inner forklift pockets.
The outer pairs of pockets lack markings or symbols. It is obvious here that the
arrangement of these pockets also allows handling of the full container by forklift truck,
but one can never be sure. This example shows that there is a need for marking to be
mandatory.
Forklift pockets on a
"tilt" container
With this container, it is even less certain how the forklift pockets are to be used.
Standardized regulations and compliance therewith in practice could help in the avoidance
of many losses resulting from the incorrect use of these components.
Straddle carrier
recess
Some containers have a recess along the longitudinal sides which allows the containers to
be picked up using straddle carrier load suspension devices for transport within cargo
handling facilities. Straddle carriers are specially built (low) van carriers with which loads
may be lifted but not stacked.
Grappler pockets are slots or recesses in the bo ttom side rails of containers or other C TUs,
especially inland containers and swap-bodies. Grapplers slot into them during cargo
handling. Such grapplers may also be used with gantry cranes, if no spreaders are used.
Grappler pockets also allow direct pick -up of the containers with the tongs of a van
carrier.
Many containers have recesses in the bottom of the front end This centrally located recess
is known as a gooseneck tunnel. A large number of C TUs, especially flatracks have them
at both ends. The tunnel does not have any effect on loading space, the inside of the
container floor or the flatrack loading area being flat. This rec ess serves in centering the
container on a gooseneck chassis.
C ontainers with goosenecks can be carried on both normal chassis and gooseneck cha ssis.
C ontainers without goosenecks can only be carried on normal chassis. Depending on the
construction of the chassis, a lower road vehicle overall height may be achieved with
gooseneck chassis. In this way, many articulated trucks can see their height reduced by
approx. 150 mm.
In accordance with the standards, gooseneck tunnels are only provided for 40' containers.
According to DIN ISO 4346 of January 1996, a distinction may be drawn between the
following types:
Further distinctions are drawn within these groups depending on design and principal
characteristics. Information relating to the respective code, the group and type code, is to
be found in Section 3.4 "Size and type codes".
Over the years, expressions have become established which do not always correspond to
the standards or which are used in addition to the standard expre ssions. Some of these
need to be explained.
The term standard container was used for the first containers in their basic form. As
these were closed and were primarily suitable for the loading of general cargo, they
were/are also known as general purpose containers, dry cargo containers or box
containers. The initial height of 8' has already very nearly been consigned to history.
Most box containers have an external height of 8' 6". Unventilated general purpose
containers have openings on either one or both end(s).
The two steel containers of virtually identical construction can be designated standard
containers. Both containers have an external height of 8'6" and no gooseneck tunnel. This
is stated in coding 2210 on the one hand and 22G1 on the other. Both containers have
forklift pockets and straddle carrier recesses.
Vents in a container
C ontainers equipped with such vents also count as unventilated general purpose
containers, although they have small vents in the upper part of the cargo space.
This container too falls into the category of "unventilated general purpose container"
although individual vents are provided all the way along the upper part of the cargo space.
Containers with end doors and side doors occupying the entire length
Another subgroup consists of container with "openings at one or both end(s) plus partial
openings on one or both sides".
The expression high-cube container originally covered all containers higher than 8' 6".
The expression is now used in practice almost only ever for containers which have an
external height of 9' 6". Particular attention needs to be given to possible height
restrictions when these containers are carried by for road and rail. It ma y be necessary to
use special chassis or carrying cars.
Comparison of a high-cube
container (9' 6") with an 8'
6" container
The yellow and black marking on the top edges of the high-cube container serves as a
warning about its height. More details about operational markings are given in Section
3.5.
40'-C ontainers have a larger volume-to-payload ratio than 20' containers, i.e. they are
suitable for goods with a higher cargo stowage factor.
Open-sided containers (OS) have solid end walls and a solid roof panel. The sides may
be closed at the bottom by folding down wooden, aluminum profile or steel sheet side
walls, which may be divided into sections. Roof bow holders and roof bows are provided
for the upper part, which may be covered with tarpaulins. The container is packed from
the side. Open-sided containers also exist which are open only on one side. If bars are
positioned over one open side, the containers can be used for transporting livestock.
Another variant is the "folding side wall" container, a type of inland container.
Open-sided container, here
in the form of a "tilt"
container with end wall
door
As is clear from the pictures, open-sided containers are also available with doors at the
rear of the container.
The statement found in many brochures to the effect that "lateral load securing consists of
planks, which are suspended between the removable central support and the corner
posts" is not to be trusted. It is essential to check what forces these structures can
absorb.
Since it is American transport that gave rise to the 8' wide standard overseas container,
these containers are not suitable for the interchangeable pool pallets used in Europe,
which have dimensions of 800 mm x 1,200 mm. To counter this problem, pallet-
compatible containers 2.50 m in width have been constructed, which must not, however,
be confused with the pre-existing inland containers 2.50 m in width.
Pallet-compatible 40' containers
General purpose containers with special features are intended to make it possible to
transport particular cargoes which could not otherwise be safely transported without
damage. Containers for hanging garments belong to this group: they are equipped
with clothes rails which are attached to special supporting bars. Textiles, hanging on coat -
hangers, can be carried in these containers.
C ontainers with natural ventilation use pressure differences between the internal
and external air for air exchange purposes. Warm air rises in the container and
exits at the top through the roof ventilation strips. C ooler external air then enters
through the floor ventilation strips.
Forced ventilation containers use fans and air ducts and/or ventilation flaps to
achieve the necessary air exchange.
C ontainer vent slots or air openings are often constructed as a labyrinth to prevent the
penetration of spray or precipitation. Often, there are openings in the bottom and top side
rails, which form regular air ducts. Sometimes, only relatively small, perforated areas are
provided at regular intervals in the outer skin.
DIN EN ISO 6346, January 1996, lists ventilated general purpose containers under C ode
V, allocating to them either group code VH or type codes such V0, V2 or V4. A distinction
is drawn between:
C ontainers with non-mechanical ventilation at the lower and upper parts of the
cargo space
Non-mechanical
ventilation at the upper
and lower parts of the
container
General purpose
containers with
mechanical
ventilation installed in the
container
There are plenty of other designs of general purpose container, in addition to those
described above. A more unusual example is the container illustrated below.
Dry bulk containers or bulk containers may be used to transport loose, free-flowing
goods. DIN EN ISO 6346 of January 1996 distinguishes, under C ode B, between the group
codes BU and BK as well as various type codes for non-pressure-resistant dry bulk
containers which are closed or air-tight and dry bulk containers with horizontal or tipping
discharge pressure-resistant at test pressures respectively of 150 kPa and 265 kPa.
Some special dry bulk containers resemble tank containers. In addition to emptying by
gravity, some containers are available which may be emptied by means of compressed
air.
Bulk container
By fitting "inlets" or liner bags, normal general cargo containers may also be used as bulk
containers:
"Inlets" in a general purpose container, for transporting bulk cargo
DIN EN ISO of January 1996 specifies under C ode S and group code SN "named cargo
containers". Examples of these include containers for transporting livestock (type code
S0), containers for transporting automobiles (type code S1) and containers for
transporting live fish (type code S2).
Depending on container quality, the entire outer skin may be appropriately insulated,
thereby reducing the internal dimensions of the container. According to ISO 1496/2, the
internal width must amount to 2200 mm. The container (reefer) floor is generally made of
T-shaped aluminum profiles and is also known as a T-grating. The floor is strong enough
to allow access by forklift trucks. The type code distinguishes between thermal containers
according to type of refrigeration unit and/or coefficients of heat transmission (k values).
The temperature of insulated containers may be controlled by external refrigeration
units.
Mobile refrigeration
unit, for stationary
use
DIN EN ISO 6346, January 1996 lists thermal containers under C ode R, namely:
mechanically refrigerated and heated under group code RT and type code R1
self powered mechanically refrigerated under group code RS and type code R2
and
self powered mechanically refrigerated and heated under group code RS and type
code R3
C ode H of the same standard covers refrigerated and/or heated thermal containers with
removable equipment, with group code HR applying to:
These containers also resemble standard containers externally, but inside they have a
heat-insulating lining, generally of polyurethane foam-based insulating material. Their wall
thickness of 50 - 100 mm reduces stowage space a little compared to normal containers.
The insulation is intended to protect the cargo from over -rapid temperature variations. If
lower temperatures or refrigeration are required, refrigerants may be added. Ice is seldom
used nowadays, since it requires special ice boxes; instead, dry ice is often used. Another
method is to vaporize liquefied gases. Such containers are used for the most part to carry
heat-sensitive cargoes.
Insulated containers and refrigerated containers may also be used without refrige ration or
heating. Since temperature variations in the container are delayed relative to the external
temperature, using such containers can be entirely appropriate for certain goods.
Fixed refrigeration units (integral units) reduce the useful length and payload of
containers.
Clip-on units for temporary fitting to thermal containers
C lip-on units increase the overall length of the containers. These heating/refrigerating
machines are individual units which may be stored on shore or on board and temporarily
attached to the end walls of containers. Each apparatus may be individually adjusted and
does not affect the cargo space atmosphere for other containers. Supply air is input at the
bottom and return air is extracted at the top.
Such containers are also known as "porthole containers", the name arising from the
similarity between these openings and the round ships' windows known as portholes.
Supply device
Thermal container/insulated container with
for a thermal
externally fitted supply device
container - detail
Externally generated cooling or heating air may be supplied via on-shore or on-board
central refrigeration systems. C ontainers supplied by this system also have two openings
in the end wall for the supply and removal of cargo space air subject to artificial
temperature control.
The term Conair container is a brand name often used for "insulated container".
Open-top containers are suitable in general for all types of general cargo but especially for
heavy, overheight cargo. Since their roofs are openable, they may also be packed from
above. They have doors at least at the rear and their roofs are openable or removable.
The roof covering consists either of a tarpaulin supported by roof bows or a solid, fully
removable hard-top. C ontainers with the latter type of roof covering are known as hard-
top open-top containers.
The roof bows of an open-top container serve both to support the tarpaulin and to
stabilize the whole container. Such containers are therefore also mad e wholly of steel, so
that the structure is still sufficiently stiff despite the absence of a roof. If overheight
cargoes are carried, the stabilizing effect of the roof bows is absent. In some cases,
therefore, it would be sensible to investigate whether it would not be equally possible to
use flatracks or indeed whether that would not be the better solution from the point of
view of cargo securing.
Half-height open-top containers are open at the top, as their name suggests. There
are two types in existence: either completely open or with a tarpaulin and roof bows. The
rear door may often be folded down and used as a ramp.
20' and 40' half-height open-top containers, with and without cover
DIN EN ISO 6346, January 1996 lists open-top containers, abbreviated as OT, under C ode
U. The group code for all such containers is UT. The following types are distinguished by
the type codes indicated:
U3 - Opening(s) at one or both end(s) plus opening(s) on one or both sides plus
removable top members
U4 - Opening(s) at one or both end(s) plus opening(s) on one side plus full
openings on the other side
With this container, the rear end wall (at the front in the left-hand picture) can be folded
out and used as an access ramp for forklift trucks. A warning is attached:
Warning about the "ramp" of a half-
height open-top container
The old, but still valid, number combination 4351 would today be replaced by the code
42U3.
Two OTs: each with rear doors and removable top members
Platforms and flatracks are also known in common parlance as open containers.
Although such containers may have special equipment, such stanchions, fold-down end
walls, lashing equipment etc., they are often described in specialist literature as
containers without additional equipment.
Platforms consist of reinforced container floors with sheet steel or planking. A large
number of lashing points are provided for cargo securing; these may be welded -on or
recessed lashing lugs or rings, or lashing bars attached to the outsides of the side rails.
If agreed with the shipping companies, several pla tforms may be combined to form larger
loading areas for carrying oversize goods. Acceptance and delivery then require special
attention and coordination of operations between the ship's command, shipping
companies and terminal operator is recommended. When empty, platforms can be stacked
into piles to save space during transport. Since loaded platforms are not stackable, they
are loaded on board ship as the top layer of a hold or deck stack. If a ship's cell guides are
equipped with flaps, any stowage space can be used. 20' platforms are generally 335 mm
(1'1¼") high, while 40' platforms are generally 610 mm (2') high). There are 40'
platforms with gooseneck tunnels at both ends.
The advantage of collapsible flatracks is that several unloaded flats can be stacked on top
of one another to save space during transport. For cargo securing purposes, the flats are
equipped with lashing bars, lugs or hooks of appropriate strength. Stanchion pockets and
insertable stanchions are often provided. If agreed with the carriers, a number of flatracks
may be combined together so as to be able to transport particularly large items of cargo.
3.1.1.3 Container design and types, Part 3
DIN EN ISO 6346, January 1996 allocates C ode P to platform containers, with this edition
of the standard combining both pure platforms and flatracks under this letter. Pure
platforms bear group code PL or type code P0.
P1 platforms have two complete, fixed end walls, irrespective of how high they are.
Platform containers falling under P2 with corner posts and special load
retainers
P2 platforms have fixed posts, either free -standing or with removable top members. The
containers illustrated here are specially constructed to accommodate stacking boxes. The
boxes are carrying cargo securing materials for securing the containers on board. They are
naturally also ideal for transporting other heavy small pa rts.
Group code PC covers type codes P3 and P4. P3 platforms have folding complete end
walls.
40' platform with
completely folding end
walls - collapsed
P4 platforms have folding posts, either free -standing or with removable top members.
Coil containers are built like flats or flatracks, i.e. they consist of a container floor and
flat or frame-like end walls. The container floor has cargo troughs for accommodating
coils/rolls of steel sheet. C argo securing costs are lower, since less complex lashing and
blocking is required than on/in normal containers. However, when overall transpor t costs,
including the return transport of empty coil containers, are taken into account, normal
carriage without a special container may be more economical. C oil containers could be
included amongst named cargo containers, but they are not covered by the standard.
20' flatracks, with fold-down end walls and coil wells (coil containers)
Tank containers are provided for carrying liquids and gases. The characteristics of the
substances to be carried determine the material of which the tank is made, while the
pressure under which the cargo has to be transported influences its construction. Tank
containers almost always have as their basis a steel frame, into which tanks of various
shapes may be inserted. Various fittings and accessories are incorporated, depending on
type and method of filling and emptying. Temperature -controlled tank containers require
special heating or cooling devices. They may be filled via domes or tubes and emptied
downwards via floor drains or upwards via riser pipes and pressure generators or in an y
other suitable manner. The products to be carried may be any types of liquid, liquefied or
gaseous substance, ranging from harmless to very dangerous.
Tank containers for non-dangerous liquids come under group code TN. Type codes
T0, T1 and T2 distinguish between minimum pressures of 45 kPa, 150 kPa and 265 kPa.
Tank containers intended for liquid foodstuffs must be clearly marked as being intended
for this purpose:
Half-height liquid
container
Tank containers for dangerous liquids come under group code TD. Type codes T3, T4,
T5 and T6 distinguish between minimum pressures of 150 kPa, 265 kPa, 400 kPa and
600 kPa.
Tank containers for
carrying dangerous liquids
Such containers are subject, among other things, to the regulations governing the
carriage of hazardous materials and may also have to be tested for compliance with the
regulations of the Department of Transportation (DOT) or the German Federal Institute for
Materials Research and Testing (BAM).
Tank containers for gases are assigned to group code TG and type codes T7, T8 and
T9. T7 and T8 cover minimum pressures of 910 kPa and 2,200 kPa, while T9 does not as
yet have a pressure assigned to it.
Tank containers must be at least 80% full for safety reasons, so as to prevent dangerous
surging of the liquids in transit. As a rule of thumb, they should not be filled more than
95% full, so as to allow for thermal expansion of the contents.
The phrase design for ease of opening is found in container literature in relation to the
desire for rapid packing and unpacking. It is often used in relation to dry bulk containers
with special openings.
Half-height containers are lower than standard containers. The size codes distinguish
between those 1,295 mm (4'3") high and those of a height less than or equal to
1,219 mm (4'). The containers are specially designed for goods with low stowage factors
and for high-density cargoes, such as heavy barrels, metal sheet etc.
The following needs to be said with regard to special containers: from a technical point
of view, these meet the needs of many forwarders and are desirable with regard to cargo
securing. Their special fittings simplify packing and cargo securing, reducing securing
costs and shipping risks. However, since they are adapted to one product or group of
products to be transported, it is more difficult to use them on all routes, resulting in
higher freight rates than for standard containers due to more frequent carriage of empty
containers. From the point of view of cargo safety, however, special conta iners developed
for a particular product are preferable to conventional containers.
All wooden parts of containers traveling to Australia and New Zealand, including packaging
and securing lumber, must be treated, and proof must be provided in the form of
appropriate wood treatment certificates. The wooden parts of most containers are
impregnated against insect infestation. Australia's and New Zealand's quarantine
regulations require proof in the form of a plate:
The technical requirements placed on containers are enshrined in the respective standards
and in the "International C onvention for Safe C ontainers" or "C SC ".
The aim of the C onvention is to achieve the highest possible level of safety of human life
in the handling, stacking and transporting of containers. The C onvention applies to all
containers used for international transport, except containers developed especially for air
travel.
The C onvention specifies precise requirements which individual components must meet.
Annex II of the C SC gives examples of structural safety requirements and tests. According
to the C SC ,
a container made from any suitable material which satisfactorily performs the
following tests without sustaining any permanent deformation or abnormality
which would render it incapable of being used for its designed purpose, shall be
considered safe. ...
Every contracting state must ensure that effective procedures are put in place to enforce
the regulations in Annex I of the C onvention. This Annex sets out regulations for the
testing, inspection, approval and maintenance of conta iners. However, the text of the
C onvention does allow duly authorized organizations to be entrusted with all these tasks,
other than maintenance. In many countries, the national classification societies are
entrusted with these tasks, e.g. Germanischer Lloyd in Germany.
A Safety Approval Plate must be permanently affixed to every container at a readily visible
place, where it cannot be easily damaged.
CSC plate
The Plate shall contain the following information in at least the English or French
language:
The Safety Approval Plate (...) shall take the form of a permanent, non -corrosive, fire-
proof rectangular plate measuring not less than 200 mm by 100 mm. The words "CSC
Safety Approval" of a minimum letter height of 8 mm and all other words and numbers of
a minimum height of 5 mm shall be stamped into, embossed on or indicated on its surface
in any other permanent and legible way.
Date (month and year) of manufacture is year: 1998 and month: September
(stated according to ISO standard as 98-9).
Allowable stacking weight for 1.8 g (kilograms and lbs). According to ISO
standards, fully loaded containers must be stackable six high. The container given
by way of example may be stacked 192,000 high (192,000 kg ÷ 24,000 kg = 8).
These days, higher permissible loading capacities are practically the rule. On many
containers, this is not only pointed out on the C SC plate but is also highlighted by the
provision of special plates.
Transverse racking test load value.In this instance, this value is 15,240 KGS or
33,600 LBS.
Transverse racking test
The values stated for the racking test are approximately in line with the standard; if the
stated units of mass (kilograms) are converted into newtons, a slight difference remains.
The test must be performed from both sides. The ISO standard requires loading of only 75
kN, Lloyd's Register requires 100 kN and Germanischer Lloyd applies 125 kN in its tests.
Paragraph 2 b) states):
A blank space should be reserved on the Plate for insertion of end and/or side -
wall strength values (factors) in accordance with Regulation 1, paragraph 3 and
Annex II, texts 6 and 7. A blank space should also be reserved on the Plate for
first and subsequent maintenance examination dates (month and year) when
used.
The C SC Safety Approval Plates illustrated above do not carry these details. With good
reason, since the regulations subsequently state:
End Wall Strength to be indicated on plate only if end walls are designed to
withstand a load of less or greater than 0.4 times the maximum permissible
payload, i.e. 0.4 P.
Side Wall Strength to be indicated on plate only if the side walls are designed to
withstand a load of less or greater than 0.6 times the maximum permissible
payload, i.e. 0.6 P.
"A blank space should also be reserved on the CSC Plate for first and subsequent
maintenance examination dates (month and year) when used."
In the example illustrated, this blank space has been left not at the bottom but on the
right of the other required data (see arrow). This is common practice.
In the "International C onvention for Safe C ontainers", Regulation 2 of Annex I deals with
maintenance, and reads as follows:
3. The date (month and year) before which the container shall be re -examined shall
be clearly marked on the container on or as close as practicable to the Safety
Approval Plate and in a manner acceptable to that Contracting Party which
prescribed or approved the particular maintenance procedure involved.
Next examination
date not stated
Correct: Next
examination date
entered
4. The interval from the date of manufacture to the date of the first examination
shall not exceed five years. Subsequent examination of new containers and re -
examination of existing containers shall be at intervals of not more than twenty -
four months. All examinations shall determine whether the container has any
defects which could place any person in danger.
The container was manufactured in 1998. On the C SC Plate, the first re -examination date
is given as being month 09, i.e. September, 2003 (this is difficult to read on the Figure).
5. For the purposes of this Regulation, "the Contracting Party concerned" is the
Contracting Party of the territory in which the owner is domiciled or has his head
office.
For some years now, owners have in most cases been responsible for examining their own
containers. Regulators have provided for this by establishing an "Approved Continuous
Examination Program", in which owners participate. ACEP is a recognized repair and
maintenance system providing for regular examinations and servicing. To participate
actively in this program, it is necessary to register with the competent authori ties.
Registration is indicated on the container. The owner has then to take responsibility for
the necessary inspections and the date for re -examination need no longer be indicated on
the C SC plate.
C hapter II of the "International C onvention for Safe C ontainers" sets out regulations for
approval of new containers by design type, as quoted in detail below:
Regulation 3 - Approval of new containers
To qualify for approval for safety purposes under the present Convention all new
containers shall comply with the requirements set out in Annex II.
Regulation 4 - Design type approval
In the case of containers for which an application for approval has been
submitted, the Administration will examine designs and witness testing of a
prototype container to ensure that the containers will conform with the
requirements set out in Annex II. When satisfied, the Administration shall notify
the applicant in writing that the container meets the requirements of the present
Convention and this notification shall entitle the manufacturer to affix the Safety
Approval Plate to every container of the design type series.
C hapter III of the C SC sets out "Regulations for approval of new containers by individual
approval" and chapter IV sets out "Regulations for approval of existing containers" .
In the case of box containers, the test plate is generally affixed to the left door leaf.
Germanischer Lloyd test plates for approval by design type
The classification societies mentioned above are just a few examples of the many in
existence. Other examples are the Belgian Bureau Veritas, Lloyd's Register in Great
Britain, Nippon Kaiji Kyokai in Japan and Det Norske Veritas in Norway.
The Figures show additional plates affixed to the container and/or markings written
thereon. In the "International C onvention for Safe C ontainers", Regulation 1, Point 4
comments on this issue as follows:
4. The presence of the Safety Approval Plate does not remove the necessity of
displaying such labels or other information as may be required by other
regulations which may be in force.
The various contracting states each recognize one another's national approving bodies.
Although the states are bound by the C SC 's structural safety requirements and tests,
there is nothing to stop them enforcing additional safety requirements for their own
containers.
Type testing involves a wide range of test procedures, covering, for example, lifting from
top corner castings, lifting from bottom corner castings, lifting using other additional
devices on the container such as forklift pockets, grappler arm positions and other
methods. The test procedures also extend to stacking and to concentrated loads on roof
and floor. Transverse racking is another aspect which is subject to testing. Furthermore,
containers must undergo permissible loading capacity tests with regard to longitudinal
restraint, the end walls and the side walls.
The character combination 1AA indicates a 40' long, 8'6" high standard container, while
the letter C here stands for C losed.
This container has also been type tested (yellow arrow). The character combination 1AA
indicates a 40' long ISO container 8'6" high. The abbreviation OT stands for open-top
(green arrow). The container is not subject to an "Approved Container Examination
Program" (AC EP) and the Plate therefore carries the date of its next examination (blue
arrow), fully in accordance with regulations. Since the container was built in 1997, its first
test falls due in 2002, with subsequent examinations at two year intervals.
Owing to their cargo space being closed on all sides, box containers offer good possibilities
for cargo securing by compact loading.
For securing individual items, a tight fit may be achieved using bracing, especially in
corrugated steel containers. On the other hand, the possibilities for lashing are very
limited. Relatively useful lashing lugs or rings are pr ovided in all inland containers.
Problems arise if lashing points are overstowed and are no longer available or reachable.
Their strength also presents a problem: in general, their Maximum Securing Load (MSL) or
Lashing C apacity (LC ) is only 1,000 daN per lashing point.
Lashing points on the
frame parts of a container
The lashing points for containers are not currently covered by standards and may
therefore differ greatly. Not all lashing points may be loaded in all directions.
Lashing points must be attached to the frame parts of a container, since only these
components are adequately capable of absorbing forces.
Lugs fitted in the area of the top side rails and sometimes also the front top end rails can
only be used to a minimal degree for traditional cargo securing by lashing. Lugs are
suitable, indeed almost too strong, for attaching "inlets" or special nonwoven fabric for
catching sweat.
Nonwoven fabric providing
protection against
condensation water
Attaching
nonwoven fabric
In any case, such measures serve to protect the cargo, and therefore to kee p it safe:
nonwoven fabrics provide protection against moisture or wetness dripping from the
container ceiling and "inlets" protect against contact with the container walls. Some
containers have lashing bars halfway up the container walls. In corrugated steel
containers, they are welded in between the corrugations. The maximum securing load of
these bars is not very high and they can only be used to secure relatively light individual
items or small blocks of palletized cargo. The same applies to individual lashing rails fitted
into the wooden linings of aluminum containers.
Platform containers, i.e. the group comprising platforms and flatracks, have a relatively
large number of reasonably strong securing elements.
Stanchion pocket
in a 40' collapsible flatrack
To achieve a tight fit by application of pressure, stanchions or stakes are very often
provided, which may be inserted into corresponding stanchion (or stake) pockets.
Right and left:
Do not attach
lashings to
stanchion
(or stake) pocket
components
Although the stanchion (or stake) pocket closing bar looks suitable for use as a lashing
bar, this is expressly forbidden.
Lashing points
next to stanchion
pockets on flatracks
Flatrack with
lashing rings
Lashing point on the
bottom rail of a flatrack
It is regrettably often the case that no details are given about the strength of lashing
points. Even if information is provided, it is mostly of no practical use because of the
wording chosen. Further explanations relating to this problem are provided in the section
headed Lashing materials, which states:
The maximum securing load (MSL) can be calculated using a rule of thumb, according to
which the diameter of the lashing points is de termined, squared and multiplied by 10; i.e.
diameter x diameter x 10. The result of the calculation is in decanewtons (daN) if the
diameter is stated in millimeters and kilonewtons (kN) if the diameter is stated in
centimeters.
According to the above-stated rule of thumb, the maximum securing load o f the lashing
point is determined as follows:
In decanewtons: 20 · 20 · 10 = 4,000 daN
In kilonewtons: 2 · 2 · 10 = 40 kN
The rule of thumb can only be applied if the weld seams look good and the weld substrate
appears sufficiently strong. If lashing points are welded to excessively thin metal sheet,
the rule of thumb must not be used for calculation.
The rule cannot be applied, either, if the lashing points, e.g.
rings, are held on with pop rivets, thin screws or the like,
despite the rings "looking good".
This flatrack has fixed belt reels, all on one side. The eyelets of the textile belts can be
secured on hooks on the other side. Unfortunately, this securing system is virtually
unusable, because the "tie-down lashing/over-top lashing/friction loop" method has only a
frictional effect, and this only with one-sided, uneven pretension. The belts do not allow a
homogeneous tight fit to be achieved. If four of the total of eight la shing reels were fitted
on each side, appropriate securing could be achieved for many types of goods.
The containers themselves are secured on ships and road and rail vehicles by means of
the container corner castings. Appropriate securing systems, such as rods on board ship,
twist locks or other lock units etc., may be attached in or to the corner castings, which are
also responsible for load transfer if the containers are stacked in ship cell guides.
Occasionally, complaints arise during road-side cargo securing inspections because not all
of the lock units have been firmly tightened, when of course they should be. The C TU
packing guidelines provide advice on this matter. Section 6.4 states, on the subject of
"C TUs on vehicles":
6.4.1 CTUs should be firmly secured on vehicles before the vehicle is moved. The
most appropriate points for fixing containers and swap-bodies are the bottom
corner castings of the unit. Before and during transport, it should be checked that
the unit is properly secured on the vehicle.
6.4.2 For transport on public roads or by rail, containers and swap -bodies should
be secured to the road or rail vehicle by all bottom corner castings, in the absence
of which, appropriate alternative measures should be taken. Th e main forces
during the transport operation should be transferred to the unit through these
bottom corner castings. Some additional forces may be transferred between the
road vehicle chassis or rail-car surface and the unit bottom through load transfer
areas in the unit bottom and in the vehicle surface. The securing devices on the
vehicle may be twist locks, securing cones or securing guides. All such securing
devices should be designed in such a way that the "open" or "locked" position of
such securing devices is readily apparent.
It is very common for problems to arise when containers, loaded in particular on road
vehicles and attached firmly thereto, have to be carried by combined road/ship/road
transport. Only occasionally do the vehicles have the legally prescribed lashing points, and
even if they are present, they tend to be positioned extremely unfavorably or to be
incorrectly or defectively designed. As at 2003, this is true of approx. 80% of all vehicles
which have to be carried by sea.
The current standard which deals with the coding, identification and marking of containers
is DIN EN ISO 6346, dated January 1996. Among other things, this standard specifies that
the previous standards with similar content have equal validity , since a number of older
versions of containers with different markings naturally remain in service alongside the
brand new ones. This Section will provide only certain essential explanations with regard
to the systems used - for more detailed information, the reader should refer to the
corresponding standards and more extensive specialist literature.
The foreword to the standard states, among other things, that it includes not only the
statutory units but also corresponding sizes stated in Anglo -American units. Under the
German Units of Measurement Act, 22nd February 1985, the use of such units nationally
and commercially in Germany is proscribed. Such units may only be quoted to aid
business relationships with countries which still use these units.
Container
identification
marking
The container identification system specified in DIN EN ISO 6346 consists solely of the
elements shown, which can only be used together:
check digit
The owner code must be unique and registered with the International C ontainer Bureau
(BIC - Bureau International des C ontainers - 14, Rue Jean Rey, 75015 Paris), either
directly or through a national registration organization. The German BIC representative is
the Studiengesellschaft für den kombinierten Verkehr e.V., Börsenplatz 1, 60313 Frankfurt
am Main (tel. +49 69 283571 or +49 172 6700597). The SGKV can provide information
and handle applications for registration of an owner code. In the Figures shown, the owner
code consists respectively of the letter combinations SUD and TEX.
The product group code consists of one of the following three capital letters:
U - for all freight containers
J - for detachable freight container-related equipment
Z - for trailers and chassis
The term owner code may also apply to the combination of owner code and product group
code, which is also known as an alpha prefix.
The registration or serial number consists of six digits. In the examples shown, these
numbers are 307007 and 452149. If the container number consists of fe wer than six
digits, it is preceded by enough zeros to make a six -digit number sequence.
The check digit, 9 and 6 respectively in the two examples shown, is always a single -digit
number. It is usually in a box, to make it stand out from the registration number.
The check digit can be used to validate whether the owner code, product group code and
registration number have been accurately transmitted. No freight information system
(FIS), transport information system (TIS) or similar data processing system will accept a
container number, if the result of the automatic checking procedure does not show
agreement with the check digit. The procedure is deliberately designed to ensure that a
number of transmission errors cannot cancel one another out, resulting in the acceptance
of incorrect data. The checking procedure is as follows:
An equivalent numerical value is assigned to each letter of the alphabet, beginning with
10 for the letter A (11 and multiples thereof are omitted):
The individual digits of the registration number keep their everyday value, i.e. 1 = 1, 2 =
2 etc.
The following numerical values are accordingly obtained for the two examples with the
alpha prefixes "SUDU" and "TEXU":
If someone makes a mistake when transmitting a container number and inputs the
alphanumeric sequence TEXU 452149 into a corresponding system instead of TEXU
452159, the program would perform the following calculation:
Since the correct check digit for this container is 6, the system would indicate an error.
The check digit 0 may occur twice, since it arises where the final difference is 0 and where
it is 10. To ensure that this does not happen, the standard recommends that registration
numbers should not be used which produce a final difference of 10. This is the case,
however, with the registration number shown.
Correct identification using check digit
The following photo shows a variant of horizontal marking which additionally includes
country, size and type codes (in accordance with the 1985 version of DIN ISO 6346, use
of which is still permitted):
Appropriate abbreviations are used for the various countries, here US for United States of
America, GB for Great Britain etc.
The first digit of the size code indicates the length of the container, with the number 4
standing for a 40' container. The second digit indicates height and whether or not a
gooseneck tunnel is present. In our example, the number 3 stands for a height of 8 foot 6
inches (8'6") with gooseneck tunnel. The first digit of the type code indicates container
type. Here, 1 means that the container is a closed container with v entilation openings. The
second digit of the type code relates to special features. The 0 used here means opening
at the end.
The corresponding data are laid out underneath. The abbreviation g.n.t. stands for
gooseneck tunnel. A differently laid out size code summary is shown below:
In the type code, the first digit (i.e. the 3rd digit overall) indicates the container type and
the second (i.e. the 4th digit overall) indicates special features. Howev er, there is a
connection between the respective digits, which the following representation is intended to
explain:
Incorrectly marked
platform container
The digit sequence 4364 means: 40' long container 8'6" high with gooseneck tunnel and
folding, free-standing posts. It should carry the digit sequence 4363, since the platform
container has complete, folding end walls.
Here are some examples of marking in accordance with this older standard:
This container is 20' long (2) and 8' 6" high (2). It is a
ventilated standard container (1), with narrow, passive
vents in the upper part (0).
This container is 40' long (4), 8'6" high and has a
gooseneck tunnel (3). It is a ventilated standard
container (1), with narrow, passive vents in the upper
part (0).
According to the old Annex F "size code designations" annexed to DIN ISO 6346 of August
1985, the two containers are 40' long (number 4) and 8'6" high with a gooseneck tunnel
(number 3). According to Annex G "type code designations", both containers are partially
ventilated closed containers, which have passive vents in the upper part of the cargo
space, the total cross-sectional area of the vents being less than 25 cm² per meter of
container length (number combination 10).
However, the coding does not indicate that the green container is 2.50 m wide.
Below:
Warning due to
2.50 m width
The January 1996 edition of the standard bearing the same number includes another "size
code", which has eradicated these inadequacies.
Like the above containers, this container is 40' long,
8½' high and has a gooseneck tunnel (number
sequence 43). The type code 51 states that it is an
open-top container, with openings at one or both end
walls and a removable top member in the end frame.
According to the old country code, RC X stands for C hina (Taiwan). The size code 43 states
that it is a 40' container 8'6" high and with a gooseneck tunnel. The number combination
64 states that it is a platform with folding, free -standing corner posts.
Both containers have a nominal length of 40', but are higher than 8'6" and each have a
gooseneck tunnel (size code number sequence 45). According to type code 10, both
containers are partially ventilated closed containers, which have passive vents in the
upper part of the cargo space, the total cross-sectional area of the vents being less than
25 cm² per meter of container length.
These photos show clearly that the container is a 40' long refrigerated container.
According to the size code, the container height is > 8'6" - this is correct, as the container
is 9½ feet high. The number combination 32, given as the type code, states that the
container may be refrigerated or heated.
The following photo shows a variant of horizontal marking with size and type codes:
The container is 12,192 mm (40') long, 2,438 mm (8') wide and 2,591 mm (8'6") high.
This is a general purpose container without ventilation, but which does have vents in the
upper part of the cargo space.
The current standard, used for this marking, is not limited to numbers but also uses
letters to make marking more precise. In addition, swap-bodies and the like are also
covered by the coding. The superordinate term for both numbers and letters is character.
The introductory country code has been discontinued.
The first character of the size code indicates the length of the receptacle:
In the example, the 4 accordingly stands for a 40' container.
The second character is the code for the height and width of the container.
The standard type code allows identification of container type and other characteristics.
Since this system is not yet complete, the standard recommends use of the group code if
special characteristics of the container type have not yet been fixed or are unknown. T he
highest unassigned code character should be used as a provisional mark when it is
necessary to represent significant characteristics which are not yet included in the Table.
1
) 100 kPa = 1 bar = 105 Pa = 105 N/m² = 14.5 lbf/in² (PSI)
1
) 100 kPa = 1 bar = 105 Pa = 105 N/m² = 14.5 lbf/in² (PSI)
The container is 12,192 mm or 40' long (number 4 of first character of the size code). Its
height is 2,895 mm or 9'6" and its width is greater than 2,438 mm or 8' and is less than
or equal to 2,500 mm (letter E or second character of the size code). As regards type, the
container is a general purpose container without ventilation, whose main characteristic is
that it has vents in the upper part of the cargo space (characters G1 of the type code).
The owner code and product group code are also known as the alpha prefix. The
check digit is often written in a box: .
There now follows a number of examples of marking according to DIN EN ISO 6346,
January 1996:
According to the two character combinations 22 and 42 of the size code, the container
on the left is 6,058 mm or 20' long and the two containers on the right are
12,192 mm or 40' long. All the containers are 2,591 mm or 8'6" high and 2,438 mm
or 8' wide. The type code characters G1 state tha t the container is a general purpose
container without ventilation but with vents in the upper part of the cargo space.
According to the two characters 22 of the size code, the container is 6,058 mm or 20'
long, 2,591 mm or 8' 6" high and 2,438 mm or 8' wide. The type code characters P3 state
that the container is a platform based container with folding complete end walls.
According to the two characters 42 of the size code, According to the two
the container is 12,192 mm or 40' long, 2,591 mm or characters 45 of the size code,
8'6" high and 2,438 mm or 8' wide. The type code the container is 12,192 mm or
characters U1 state that the container is an open-top 40' long, 2,895 mm or 9'6"
container which may additionally be equipped with high and 2,438 mm or 8' wide.
opening(s) at one or both end(s) plus removable top The type code characters G1
door rail in the end frame. state that the container is a
general purpose container
without ventilation but with
vents in the upper part of the
cargo space.
Given the large number of containers available today, it is impossible to tell how long the
current codings will suffice and when more characters will need to be introduced.
The operational markings according to DIN EN ISO standard 6346, January 1996, are
intended to simplify use of the container by providing additional information and warnings.
These markings also include both compulsory and optional markings. Examples of
compulsory markings are those indicating gross weight and tare weight, which naturally
have to agree with those on the C SC Approval Plate.
The standard prescribes the following form and sequence for marking of gross and tare
weights:
On this container, the minimum compulsory marking requirements are fulfilled as far as
the data are concerned, but the sequence is wrong, the English customary values being
given first.
It is also compulsory to affix certain warning symbols. These include pictograms for
air/surface containers, the danger posed by overhead power cables and height markings
for containers which are higher than 2.6 m (8'6").
According to the standard, the symbols should have the following dimensions: aircraft
130 mm (5"), stackability symbols 280 mm (11") high and 260 mm (10") high. The
capital letters should be at least 80 mm (3") high.
All containers equipped with ladders must be provided with a warning symbol, which
indicates the danger posed by overhead power cables.
DIN EN ISO 6346 of January 1996 stipulates that all containers higher than 2.6 m (8'6")
must carry the following compulsory markings:
yellow and black stripes, visible at the top and side, which must be affixed in the
upper part of each side and end. These must start at the corner castings and
extend at least 300 mm (12").
Optional markings, such as mirror images of the height marking at every suitable point
(e.g. end wall), may be affixed.
In mirror image:
9'6" HIGH CAUTION
Optional height marking
It has always been usual to mark high-cube containers with optional markings of various
designs. The upper pair of images show a container marked according to the January
1996 edition of DIN EN ISO 6346, while the lower pair show a container marked according
to the August 1985 edition of DIN ISO 6346.
It is always sensible to emphasize the height of individual containers, even if it does n't
always help.
Height markings do
have to be observed.
One possible optional operational marking which most operators do affix states maximum
payload or net cargo weight, which is the difference between the maximum gross weight
and the tare weight of a container. Although this marking is optional, the standard does
stipulate that the weight labeled NET be given first in kilograms and then in pounds. In
general, the various markings are so arranged that the weight data are followed by
container volume data.
The maximum gross weight may well deviate from the standard values.
Many containers carry instructions about using particular structural elements, which are
intended to serve as warnings.
It is not necessary to be able to read the instructions in the picture. The point is simply
that there are such instructions describing how a collapsible flatrack is to be erected and
collapsed and what points have to be observed.
It should go without saying that inexperienced people should not be trusted with such
activities. In any case, trained personnel also need to heed such instructions.
Statement of compliance
with structural regulations
from Bureau Veritas
Details of owner,
manufacturer and
treatment of plywood
floor in accordance with
Australian requirements
Warnings about
extra-large width
The relevant standard allows for the areas of yellow and black stripes next to the corner
castings to be reduced to a length of 300 mm (12").
It will be noted that the standard does not conform with the regulations in the German
road traffic code and those of other countries, since in the standard the diagonal black and
yellow stripes always run in the same direction.
Only this symmetrical arrangement of the warning plates, as provided for in the
regulations, makes any sense.
It would be a good idea if this were taken into consideration when the standards are
revised.
Top and selective enlargements below:
Optional details are indicated by colored arrows.
The standards allow for optional affixing of size and type codes to the roof and front end
wall (green arrows). The same applies to affixing a data medium for automatic
identification (blue arrow) and to marking of the net cargo weight (yellow arrow).
4.4.1.1 Placards (enlarged labels) (minimum size 250 mm x 250 mm) and, if
applicable for maritime transport, "MARINE POLLUTANT" marks (minimum size of
a side 250 mm) and other signs should be affixed to the exterior surfaces of a
CTU or unit load or overpack to provide a warning that the contents of the unit
are dangerous cargoes and present risks, unless the labels, marks or signs affixed
to the packages are clearly visible from the exterior of the unit. This type of
marking can be omitted on unit loads and overpacks if the hazard labels,
markings or warning symbols are clearly visible from the outside.
The container is loaded with C lass 3 goods, i.e. flammable liquids, which are also marine
pollutants.
The C TU packing guidelines give additional instructions for affixing placards, these being
explained in more detail in the C TU packing guidelines Point 4.4.1.2: This paragraph
reads:
(4.4.1.1 contd.) If possible, the placards, hazard labels, markings or warning
symbols on the outsides of the CTU should not be obscured when the CTU is
opened.
1. a container, one on each side and, in the case of carriage by ocean -going vessel,
also one on each of the ends of the unit;
3. any other CTU, at least one on both sides and on the back of the CTU and, in the
case of a semitrailer, also one on the front of the CTU.
Correct marking of a container for maritime transport according to the
CTU packing guidelines
It has been proposed to mark the roof with a corresponding placard, in order to warn
lifting gear or ground conveyor operators when picking up such a container. However, the
regulations do not as yet contain any such obligation.
Point 4.4.1.3 deals with dangerous cargoes which present several risks:
Whenever dangerous cargoes present several risks, subsidiary risk placards
should be displayed in addition to primary risk placards.
The regulations covering this area were amended in 2002. According to the old
regulations, the primary risk placards had to carry the correct class number, while the
subsidiary risk placard was not supposed to carry any class numbers.
The way this requirement was fulfilled was open to choice and it was of no significance
whether the class numbers were obscured by being painted or stuck over or cut off.
For dangerous cargo containers carrying dangerous goods of only one class, the
regulations in point 4.4.1.6 of the C TU packing guidelines apply:
Consignments of packaged dangerous cargoes of a single commodity, other than
cargoes of class 1, which constitute a full load for the CTU should have the UN
Number for the commodity displayed in black digits not less than 65 mm high
either against a white background in the lower half of the class placard or on an
orange rectangular panel not less than 120 mm high and 300 mm wide, with a 10
mm black border, to be placed immediately adjacent to the placard (see Annex
2). In those cases the UN Number should be displayed immediately adjacent to
the Proper Shipping Name.
According to the IMDG C ode, the regulation applies from a mass of 4,000 kg.
The container contains only one dangerous cargo, i.e. C lass 5.1 oxidizing substances
(agents), which increase the risk and intensity of fire, and are also corrosive. The (yellow)
primary risk placard correctly carries the number 5.1, but the subsidiary risk placard does
not carry the number 8 (also correct according to the old regulations), which has been
obscured. According to the currently applicable regulations, this placard would also have
to carry the class number 8.
Primary and subsidiary risk placards plus UN Number.
The placards have been incorrectly positioned. They are obscured when the door is
opened.
The IMDG C ode recommends the following wording for the "C ontainer Packing C ertificate":
When solid carbon dioxide (CO 2 - dry ice) is used for cooling purposes, the
container/vehicle is externally marked or labelled in a consp icuous place, such as,
at the door end, with the words:
"DANGEROUS CO 2 (DRY ICE) INSIDE.
VENTILATE THOROUGHLY BEFORE ENTERING."
The C TU packing guidelines contain a reminder that cargoes under fumigation may require
special precautions:
4.4.1.10 As CTUs offered for shipment under fumigation may require special
precautions, they should only be accepted with the agreement of the carrier and
they should be identified to him prior to loading. CTUs under fumigation are now
included in class 9 of the IMDG Code.
The intention of this Section was merely to provide so me tips for marking dangerous
cargo containers. In a real packing situation, obviously, the other regulations in the C TU
packing guidelines should be consulted, especially the valid dangerous cargo regulations.
Picture of the warning sign "FUMIGATION WARNING"