PSM Course 2014 Day 1
PSM Course 2014 Day 1
PSM Course 2014 Day 1
• Industrial Processes
• Operations Management
• Commitment to Process Safety
• Understand Hazards and Risks
• Manage Risks
• Learn from Experience
Day 1
• Aluminium Production
*) Center For Chemical Process Safety, “The Business Case for Process Safety”, 2nd Edition, 2006
Business Case For Process Safety
• Corporate Responsibility
• Business Flexibility
• Risk Reduction
• Sustained Value
Arnold Allemang
Vice President, Global Manufacturing
The Dow Chemical Company
*) Center For Chemical Process Safety, “The Business Case for Process Safety”, 2nd Edition, 2006
Corporate Responsibility
*) Center For Chemical Process Safety, “The Business Case for Process Safety”, 2nd Edition, 2006
Business Flexibility
*) Center For Chemical Process Safety, “The Business Case for Process Safety”, 2nd Edition, 2006
Risk Reduction
*) Center For Chemical Process Safety, “The Business Case for Process Safety”, 2nd Edition, 2006
Sustained Value
*) Center For Chemical Process Safety, “The Business Case for Process Safety”, 2nd Edition, 2006
“Increased Productivity”
*) Center For Chemical Process Safety, “The Business Case for Process Safety”, 2nd Edition, 2006
“Production Cost Reduction”
• Improvement in yields
• Lower costs for material rework (quality)
• Lower costs for waste stream disposal
• Prevention of hazards and operability issues
• More efficient staffing requiring less supervision
• Engaged employees participating in continuous improvement
*) Center For Chemical Process Safety, “The Business Case for Process Safety”, 2nd Edition, 2006
“Maintenance Cost Reduction”
*) Center For Chemical Process Safety, “The Business Case for Process Safety”, 2nd Edition, 2006
“Capital Budget Reduction”
*) Center For Chemical Process Safety, “The Business Case for Process Safety”, 2nd Edition, 2006
“Insurance Cost Reduction”
*) Center For Chemical Process Safety, “The Business Case for Process Safety”, 2nd Edition, 2006
Process Safety Management
*) Center For Chemical Process Safety, “Risk Based Process Safety – An Overview”, San Antonio, April 28, 2013
Process Safety Management
*) Center For Chemical Process Safety, *) Sepeda, L.A., “Understanding Process Safety Management”, American
“Guidelines for Risk Based Process Safety”, Institute of Chemical Engineering, August 2010
2007
Commit to Process Safety
*) Center For Chemical Process Safety, “Guidelines for Risk Based Process Safety”, 2007
Understand Hazards and Risks
*) Center For Chemical Process Safety, “Guidelines for Risk Based Process Safety”, 2007
Manage Risks
*) Center For Chemical Process Safety, “Guidelines for Risk Based Process Safety”, 2007
Learn from Experience
*) Center For Chemical Process Safety, “Guidelines for Risk Based Process Safety”, 2007
Operational Excellence
X1
X2 X4
→ Y
X → Y
X3 X5
t1 t2
• System
• Interdependence
• Steady State
• Knowledge about Variation
• Common Cause versus Special Cause
• Stable and Unstable States Type of Variation Characteristics
Characteristics
?
Material
Men Primary Outputs
Methods Process
Machine
Control
Lean Manufacturing: Principles
Inventory
Motion Waiting
Over
Production
Transport
Extra
“The more inventory a company has, …the
less likely they will have what they
need.”
T. Ohno
Toyota Production System
Flow
Value Stream Mapping (1)
Value Stream Mapping (2)
Example
Other Tools
Poka-Yoke
“Error proof”
Jidoka
“Stop the line”
Example: 10 steps/decisions
Process σ
Scatter Plots Regression DOE
Pilot
Wk 1 Wk 2 Wk 3 Wk 4 Wk 5 Wk 6 Wk 7 Wk 8 Wk 9 Wk 10 Wk 11 Wk 12
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I Documenting Response Plan
J
Different Methods
PDCA 7 STEPS “DMAIC”
Plan 1 Charter/Theme Define
Do 4 Solution Improve
Planning And
Implementation
Check 5 Confirming
Solution Works
6 Standardization Control
Closing Start
Control and 1 Define problem and goal
sustain by 6
standardisation
Go/no go Go/no go
S
?
TIP Q42006
Pareto
Implement 5 2 Measure facts
100%
improvements
M M
No jumping to
Go/no go M M
by Review
solutions!
4 3 Analyse the
Generate facts
improvements
Go/no go
Process Variation
Process
Performance
SIGMA SIGMA
After Before
Abnormality Detection
Expert Systems
25 30%
AlF3
20 20%
Al2O3
CUSUM Ratio Al2O3 [%]
Soft Sensors
15 10%
CUSUM AlF3 [kg]
10 0%
5 -10%
0 -20%
1-Feb-06 11-Feb-06 21-Feb-06 3-Mar-06 13-Mar-06 23-Mar-06 2-Apr-06 12-Apr-06
-5 -30%
-10 -40%
Date [m /d]
Root Cause Analysis Techniques
Control Objective (1)
Data Analysis
Heater
Measurements Action
Explanation
Common Cell for Process Control
Behaviour Variation Actions Window open
and heater on
• Traditional Methods
• Trial on a Group of Cells
• Trial Group
• Start Test on t=t0
• Evaluation of Results after t=tend
*) S. Rutledge, “Statistical Methods for Use in the Aluminium Smelting Industry”, Light Metals, 2008, pp. 325-327
Experimental Design
*) www.iso.org
Swimlanes
Organizational Structure
Site Manager
Human
QHSE Controlling Production Technology Maintenance
Resource
Workshop – Define Ambition
• 5 Groups
• 1 Representative, 5 Minutes Presentation, Less than 50 Words