A Numerical Model For Segmented Flow in A Microreactor
A Numerical Model For Segmented Flow in A Microreactor
A Numerical Model For Segmented Flow in A Microreactor
www.elsevier.com/locate/ijhmt
a
Laboratory for Applied Microsystems, Cardiff School of Engineering, Cardiff University, QueenÕs Buildings, P.O. Box 689,
Cardiff CF2 3TF, UK
b
Department of Chemical & Process Engineering, University of Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK
Received 6 August 2002
Abstract
A numerical model for segmented flow in a microreactor has been developed. The model is based on computational
fluid dynamics (CFD) which means that the flow field and mass transfer are described by a set of partial differential
equations. A general purpose CFD code was extended in order to predict the internal flow patterns of fluid segments
and the transfer of dissolved chemical species within segments and across fluid segment interfaces. The model has been
validated by comparing predicted data with experimental microreactor titrations.
Ó 2003 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
Nomenclature
(Navier–Stokes equations) and mass and may also in- of Coventor, Inc. [11]. Most commercial CFD codes are
clude equations for the conservation of energy, con- user friendly but vary in the add-on models they provide
centration of chemical species and other scalar variables which may include models for particle tracking or
depending on the flow under investigation. This set of chemical reaction. Codes also vary in the flexibility they
partial differential equations provides continuous data offer for user development.
for the flow domain, however, direct solution of this A numerical model for segmented flow in a micro-
equation set is not possible. The flow domain is divided reactor was developed and validated in this study.
into a mesh of volumes and the partial differential Model development involved extending a CFD code to
equations are discretised over the computational mesh predict the flow field and mass transfer for immiscible
yielding a set of algebraic equations which are then liquid–liquid segmented flow. The numerical predictions
solved by an iterative calculation procedure. Solution of for this study were performed with the CFD code CFX,
the algebraic equation set provides velocity, pressure which is a general purpose commercial code offering a
and scalar (such as, temperature and concentration of range of add-on models appropriate for microfluidic
chemical species) data for each mesh volume in the fluid applications and sufficient access to the source code to
domain. This vast array of solution data is processed to enable user software developments.
provide graphical representations of the solution in the Microreactor experiments carried out at Newcastle
form of speed maps, velocity vectors, streamlines and University provided data which was used to validate the
scalar concentration maps [8]. model [1]. Titration reactions were carried out to dem-
Availability of fast processors, computer memory onstrate the mass transfer performance of segmented
and advanced graphics capabilities at reasonable cost flow. Predicted data was compared with experimental
together with commercially available user friendly CFD titration times and with photographic images of seg-
codes has meant that most areas of fluid engineering mented flow titration.
now use CFD as a design or research tool [8]. A number Development and validation of the model are des-
of commercially available CFD codes exist which are cribed in this paper.
appropriate for microfluidic applications. The majority
of these are general purpose codes, such as CFX,
property of AEA Technology plc. [9], and FLUENT, 2. Segmented flow
property of Fluent Inc. [10]. A small number of avail-
able codes are designed specifically for microfluidic ap- Segmented flow is comprised of alternating aqueous
plications with preset options for microfluidic geometries and organic segments (see Fig. 1). The aqueous phases
and flow regimes, for example, CoventorWare, property do not mix but transfer of momentum (effects of vis-
A Cartesian coordinate system was employed with a The acid/base reaction in Eq. (3) was implemented
no-slip condition applied to the channel walls. The axi- into the segmented flow model:
symmetric nature of the flow allowed a two-dimensional
KOH þ CH3 COOH ¼ CH3 COO Kþ þ H2 O ð3Þ
slice of the channel to be considered. The two-dimen-
sional calculation permitted a high resolution compu- Acid was initialised in the organic segment to represent
tational mesh to be employed for the axial plane. acetic acid in kerosene. Solute is identified in the CFD
The interface between the fluid segments was as- code by its diffusivity in each phase and is initialised by
sumed to be flat. An adjustment factor was applied to concentration. Assisted by the recirculating flow pat-
titration time to compensate for the reduced surface terns within the fluid segments the acid diffuses into the
area resulting from the flat interface model. Alternative aqueous segment. Concentration maps representing the
modelling options for the fluid interface are discussed in distribution of acetic acid as it diffuses across the or-
Section 6. The fluid interface was defined by setting zero ganic/aqueous are presented in Fig. 6.
axial velocity for the mesh cells which form the interface. The recirculating flow patterns act to refresh the acid
This was achieved by setting the source terms for the concentration at the interface of the organic and inor-
v-momentum equation to zero (Eq. (1)––conservation ganic segments. In the aqueous segment, the recirculat-
equation for momentum in the y-coordinate direction ing flow draws the acid away from the interface along
[12]). the centre line. A true representation of movement of
acetic acid from kerosene to water is partitioning 85:1 in
dðqvÞ dq
þ divðquvÞ ¼ divðl grad vÞ þ Sy ð1Þ favour of the water phase. The source terms of the scalar
dt dy equation representing dissolved acid were calculated
to represent the partitioning movement of acetic acid
Diffusion of momentum and mass remained active
across the water/kerosene interface. Fig. 7 illustrates
across these cells. For momentum this is a condition of
how the concentration of acid was recalculated for the
equal stress across the interface (Eq. (2)):
mesh cells either side of the fluid interface. In the dia-
l1 du=dx ¼ l2 du=dx ð2Þ gram a1 and a2 represent the total mass of acid in water
and kerosene respectively. The numerical expressions
In addition to the boundary conditions at the interface below the mesh cell diagram indicate how a1 and a2 were
between the fluid segments in the calculation domain, redefined in the source terms of the scalar equation
diffusion of mass and momentum were defined at the representing dissolved acid.
segment ends which formed connections with segments Partitioning now replaces diffusion of acid at both
outside the calculation domain. Wall velocities were fluid interfaces. Concentration maps representing the
graduated to zero at the segment interfaces in order to distribution of acetic acid as it partitions across the or-
maintain continuity of velocity in mesh cells near the ganic/aqueous interface are represented in Fig. 8.
boundaries. This approximate model for the fluid seg- Solute was initialised in the aqueous segment to
ment interface required a relaxation of viscosity ratio of represent KOH in water. KOH remains in the aqueous
the aqueous and organic phases in order to reach a phase. As acetic acid partitions into the aqueous phase
converged solution with practicable computation times. the acid neutralises the base (Eq. (3)). Source terms for
A viscosity ratio of 1:1 was employed for the validation the scalar equations representing the dissolved acid and
exercise. The calculated flow field is presented as a speed base were calculated to represent the titration reaction.
map with overlaid velocity vectors in Fig. 5. The vector Concentration maps representing diminishing base
map shows the vortex flow patterns within the fluid during titration are presented in Fig. 9.
segments. Also, the wall velocity distribution is shown Most of the problem definition for the segmented
by the speed map. flow model was achieved by Fortran coded subroutines.
Fig. 6. Concentration maps representing the distribution of acetic acid as it diffuses from the organic to the aqueous phase (flow speed
0.1 mm/s). (a) t ¼ 0:1 s, (b) t ¼ 0:5 s, (c) t ¼ 1:0 s, (d) t ¼ 6:0 s.
Fig. 8. Concentration maps representing the distribution of acetic acid as it partitions from the organic to the aqueous phase (flow
speed 0.1 mm/s). (a) t ¼ 0:1 s, (b) t ¼ 0:5 s, (c) t ¼ 2:0 s, (d) t ¼ 6:0 s.
investigated within each set, these varied from 0.55 to The predicted titration times are similar to the ex-
27.0 mm/s. Fluid segment length varied with flow rate perimental values for all three sets of data indicating
with smaller segments being generated at higher speeds. that mass transfer has been predicted well by the model.
Segment lengths were between 1 and 3.8 mm. At different The predicted titration times are all within 30% of the
acid/base concentrations the same flow rates did not experimental times. The majority of predicted titration
produce the same segment length. This can be explained times (80%) are within 20% of the experimental values.
by the dependence of segment length on fluid properties. The base concentration maps in Figs. 13 and 14 show
In order to compare experimental titration times with similar distribution patterns. Fig. 13 is experimentally
predicted values the concentration of base was averaged derived, whilst Fig. 14 is theoretically predicted. The
for the aqueous segment and the endpoint of titration similarity of the concentration maps qualitatively indi-
was taken when 95% of the base had been neutralised. cates that the general pattern of the flow is predicted
well. Fig. 13 is a photographic image indicating the base
distribution in an aqueous segment 4.0 s after slug for-
5. Results mation at 2.8 mm/s. Fig. 14 is a concentration map
representing the predicted base distribution in an aque-
The predicted and experimental titration data were ous segment 4.0 s after the start of titration at 2.8 mm/s.
compared in the form of base concentration maps and Comparison of the titration photograph in Fig. 13 with
titration times. the predicted base map in Fig. 14 shows a similar dis-
Figs. 10–12 graphically present the measured and tribution of base in the aqueous segment as it is neu-
predicted titration times for each base/acid ratio: tralised during titration.
Titration time vs flow speed graphs show similar
(i) titration time vs flow speed; power law profiles for measured and predicted data
(ii) titration time vs segment length; and (Figs. 10–12). This indicates a good prediction by the
(iii) measured vs predicted titration time. model of the influence of flow speed on titration time.
N. Harries et al. / International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 46 (2003) 3313–3322 3319
Fig. 9. Concentration maps representing the distribution of base during titration (flow speed 0.1 mm/s). (a) t ¼ 0:5 s, (b) t ¼ 1:0 s,
(c) t ¼ 5:0 s, (d) t ¼ 9:0 s.
Table 1 6. Discussion
Base/acid concentration ratios employed in the experimental
titrations Although the fluid segment interface was approxi-
Experiment Base (moles/ Acid (moles/ Base/acid ratio mate in terms of both (i) the flat interface, (ii) wall ve-
litre) litre) locities near the interface and (iii) relaxed viscosity ratio
Titration (a) 0.25 NaOH 0.50 acetic 0.50 for the organic and aqueous phases, the overall perfor-
Titration (b) 0.25 KOH 0.68 acetic 0.37 mance of the model in predicting titration times and
Titration (c) 0.40 KOH 0.68 acetic 0.59 base distribution was good. A fine computational mesh
(1–2 lm) was employed for the titration simulations.
This brought the numerical solution data close to mesh
Similarly, titration time vs segment length correlation independence. Finer computational meshes give greater
shows close power law profiles for the measured and solution accuracy but demand greater computational
predicted data (Figs. 10–12) indicating that the influence resources (CPU time, RAM and disk storage). A com-
of segment length on titration time is well predicted. puter capable of running the model with a fine compu-
The influence of base/acid concentration on titration tational mesh would require at least a 400 MHz
time is accurately represented by the model. This can be processor with 1 GB internal memory and 20 GB in-
seen from the close correlation between the simulated ternal disc.
and experimental titration times for each of the base/ The model may be further refined by the implemen-
acid concentration ratios. tation of a free surface model to provide a more accurate
Measured and predicted titration times show a representation of the aqueous/organic segment interface.
high level of correlation (Figs. 10–12). R2 values were Representing the fluid segment interface in this way
0.90, 0.96 and 0.92 for titrations (a), (b) and (c) re- would allow the solution to exhibit finer details of the
spectively. flow field, such as small vortices near the parabolic
3320 N. Harries et al. / International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 46 (2003) 3313–3322
Acknowledgements
Fig. 14. Base concentration map of predicted titration after 4.0 s at 2.8 mm/s.
3322 N. Harries et al. / International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 46 (2003) 3313–3322