NCS Core Abilities Z-009-1
NCS Core Abilities Z-009-1
NCS Core Abilities Z-009-1
A
Supplement
to
National Occupational Skill Standard
(NOSS)
This SUPPLEMENT to
National Occupation Skill Standard
was developed in
Collaboration
between
and
The German Government
~ Ministry for Economic Cooperation (BMZ) ~
Under a Program of
Malaysian – German Technical Cooperation
in the field of
Vocational Education and Training
A Supplement to
National Occupational Skill Standard
Table of Content
CORE ABILITIES 2
The Concept of Workplace Competencies 3
The Development of CORE ABILITIES 3
The Characteristics of CORE ABILITIES 4
CORE ABILITIES in CBTE
The Performance-based Model 4
Contextual Learning 5
The Application of CORE ABILITIES in the Development
of Learning Packages 5
CORE ABILITIES and the Development of NOSS 6
Field Testing of CORE ABILITIES 6
Transferability of Competencies 6
Other Aspects for the Application of CORE ABILITIES 6
Panel Members for CORE ABILITIES “DACUM” Workshop 7
Panel Members for CORE ABILITIES Ability Analysis Workshop 8
CORE ABILITIES Profile (Chart) 10
CORE ABILITIES Profile (list format) 14
Sijil Kemahiran Malaysia -SKM -
Classification of Malaysian National Occupational Skill Standard
Level 1s – 5 17
CORE ABILITIES Performance Indicators 18
Appendix 60
Application of Academic and Related Skills
Performance Indicators
CORE ABILITIES
A
Supplement
to
National Occupational Skill Standard
(NOSS)
1
CORE ABILITIES
Recent discussions concerning Technical Education and Skills Training in Malaysia, the
development of National Occupational Skill Standard (NOSS), and the growing acceptance
of Competency-Based
Training and Education
(CBTE) in Malaysia’s
training institutions
have resulted in the
decision to identify
skills or abilities that are
generic to many jobs
and professions within
all areas of industry.
These “generic skills” have be identified as the learning tools or enabling requirements, which
can assist the trainee in the acquiring and applying subject or job specific knowledge skills and
comprehension to his work. Incorporating Core Abilities into training provides realistic outcomes
that can make learning more relevant and add to the trainee’s sense of achievement.
The development of CORE ABILITIES in Malaysia conforms to the global trend towards
Competency-based Training with the similar developments in the following countries:
• Key Competencies (Australia)
• Employability Skills (Canada)
• Core Skills (Great Britain)
• Key Qualifications, Project and Transfer Oriented Training (Germany)
• Essential Skills (New Zealand)
• Workplace Know-How / SCANS Competencies (USA)
1
The word ‘skill’ used in this document is conceived as a composite of three completely interdependent
components:
cognitive, effective and psychomotor behaviour
or in traditional terms: the combination of knowledge, skills and attitude
2
The Concept of Workplace Competencies
The concept of ‘Competency’ focuses on what is expected of an employee in the
workplace, rather than on the learning process; and it facilitates the ability to transfer and
apply skills and knowledge to new situations and environments.
Competency is a broad concept that includes all aspects of work performance and not just
narrow task skills.
Competency Based Training and Education (CBTE) has been introduced into Malaysia’s
vocational education and training with the following objectives:
• to increase the efficiency of Malaysia’s workforce, and
• to focus on what people can do as a result of training.
The decision to develop CORE ABILITIES was also aimed at making vocational education
and training more effective and more directly related to industry needs as CORE
ABILITIES enhance the transfer and application of skills and knowledge to new situations
and working environments.
Information from overseas sources (Australia, Canada, Germany, UK and USA) was used
for supplementary reference and verification purposes.
They focus on capacity to apply knowledge and skills in an integrated way in work
situations. CORE ABILITIES are generic in that they apply to work generally rather than
being specific to work in particular occupations, jobs and industries.
This characteristics means that the CORE ABILITIES are not only essential for effective
participation in work but are also for effective participation in further education and life-long
learning.
3
CORE ABILITIES
• Essential and generic to the world of work:
The set of CORE ABILITIES should be confined to those capabilities that are essential
for young people entering any sector of work, as well as for people already employed,
facing challenges of a changing job environment.
• Cross-curricular:
The set of CORE ABILITIES does not constitute a curriculum or set of subjects, nor do
individual CORE ABILITIES relate only to particular subject areas. Rather, the CORE
ABILITIES can be developed and applied across the range of areas of learning
comprising the curricula of school and training programs.
• Focus on outcomes:
The CORE ABILITIES describe outcomes of learning rather than processes by which
these outcomes may be achieved.
• Focus on application:
Central to the concept of competence is the application of knowledge, skills and
understanding in an integrated way; competencies do not constitute bodies of
knowledge as such.
• Integrated in practice:
The integrated nature of the CORE ABILITIES and the ways in which they are applied
to work activities means that, in practice, they overlap with each other to some extent.
4
Contextual Learning
Theory, process knowledge and practice are elements of learning, which need to be
integrated and put into context when designing training curriculum.
The National Occupational Skill Standard (NOSS) describes the Tasks and the
performance standards for a specific job and job level, which will serve as the guideline for
the identification of WHAT.
The performance assessment activities tell learners how they will demonstrate WHEN they
have mastered specific tasks/competencies. The performance indicators provided are
used as a guideline.
5
In Competency-based Training the course developer does not “think up” test questions,
instead a performance assessment task is designed which is based on the specific
competency or a NOSS Performance Standard.
As such, the provided list should be discussed by the JOB Analysis panel to identify the
respective CORE ABILITIES for the Job.
In this case, the proposed listing of the CORE ABILITIES to SKM levels may be overruled
due to specific Job requirements and industrial settings.
Transferability of Competencies
CORE ABILITIES and job specific competencies are defined so that they are transferable
to new situations.
There is evidence, however that any skill transfer may be limited unless the application of
the skill is taught in multiple contexts and situations over an extended period of time. It is
therefore important to teach learners to apply what they have learned to new and different
situations and to utilize what earlier experience has taught them. This applies to both off-
the-job and on-the-job training scenarios.
6
Panel Member for CORE ABILITIES – “DACUM” Workshop
Mr Richard Lim
Association of Forwarding Agents Port Klang, Port Klang
Mr Thirukesan Patmanathan
Binariang Sdn Bhd, Petaling Jaya
Ms Susan Lee
Institut Bank-Bank Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur
Facilitator
Mr. Reihanrd Sachs
National Vocational Training Council, Kuala Lumpur
7
Panel Member for CORE ABILITIES Analysis Workshop
Mr Michael Ng
Accord Container Line (M) Sdn Bhd, Port Klang
Mr Richard Lim
Association of Forwarding Agents Port Klang, Port Klang
Ms Susan Lee
Institut Bank-Bank Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur
Mr K. Velayutham
Perak Entrepreneur & Skills Development Centre, Pusing
8
Mr Thillainathan
Perak Entrepreneur & Skills Development Centre, Pusing
Facilitator
Mr. Reihanrd Sachs
National Vocational Training Council, Kuala Lumpur
9
CORE ABILITY Profile
GROUP ABILITIES
Locate and Process Identify and gather Document information, Utilize basic IT
Information information procedures or processes applications
01.10 L3 01.11 L3
Prepare brief reports and Read/interpret flowcharts Write memos and letters
checklists using and pictorial information
standard forms
10
CORE ABILITY Profile
GROUP ABILITIES
Utilize Local Area Prepare pictorial and Prepare flowcharts
Network (LAN)/Intranet graphic information
to exchange information
02.10 L3 02.11 L3
Work and Interact with Apply cultural Demonstrate integrity Accept responsibility for
People requirements to the and apply ethical own work and work area
workplace practices
11
CORE ABILITY Profile
GROUP ABILITIES
Develop and maintain Facilitate and coordinate Liase to achieve
team harmony and teams and ideas identified outcomes
resolve conflicts
03.16 L3 03.17 L3
Plan and Organize Work Organize own work Set and revise own Organize and maintain
Activities activities objectives and goals own workplace
04.10 L4
12
CORE ABILITY Profile
GROUP ABILITIES
Manage Resources Implement project/work Inspect and monitor Allocate and record
plans work done and/or in usage of financial and
progress physical resources
05.04 L4 05.05 L4
Work within and with Understand systems Comply with and follow Identify and highlight
Systems chain of command problems
06.07 L3 06.08 L4
Note: The levels (L) indicated in this CORE ABILITY Profile are considered general guidelines, and are
connected to the respective SKM Levels and general job functions. However, different settings
may apply depending on the work environment and industry-specific requirements.
13
CORE ABILITY Profile
02 Exchange/Communicate Information
02.01 Interpret and follow manuals, instructions and SOP’s 1
02.02 Follow telephone/ telecommunication procedures 1
02.03 Communicate clearly 1
02.04 Prepare brief reports and checklists using standard forms 1
02.05 Read/interpret flowcharts and pictorial information 1
02.06 Write memos and letters 2
02.07 Utilize Local Area Network (LAN)/Intranet to exchange information 2
02.08 Prepare pictorial and graphic information 2
02.09 Prepare flowcharts 3
02.10 Prepare reports and instructions 3
02.11 Convey information and ideas to people 3
14
03.07 Resolve interpersonal conflicts 1
03.08 Develop and maintain a cooperation within work group 2
03.09 Manage and improve performance of individuals 3
03.10 Provide consultation and counselling 3
03.11 Monitor and evaluate performance of human resources 3
03.12 Provide coaching/on-the job training 3
03.13 Develop and maintain team harmony and resolve conflicts 3
03.14 Facilitate and coordinate teams and ideas 3
03.15 Liase to achieve identified outcomes 3
03.16 Identify and assess client/customer needs 3
03.17 Identify staff training needs and facilitate access to training 3
05 Manage Resources
05.01 Implement project/work plans 3
05.02 Inspect and monitor work done and/or in progress 3
05.03 Allocate and record usage of financial and physical resources 4
05.04 Delegate responsibilities and/or authority 4
05.05 Coordinate contract and tender activities 4
15
06.07 Develop and maintain networks 3
06.08 Identify and analyse effect of technology on the environment 4
Note: The levels (L) indicated in this CORE ABILITY Profile are considered general guidelines, and are
connected to the respective SKM Levels and general job functions. However, different settings
may apply depending on the work environment and industry-specific requirements.
16
Sijil Kemahiran Malaysia (SKM)
Classification of Malaysian
National Occupation Skill Standard Levels 1 – 5
17
How to Read the CORE ABILITIES Document
Group of
CORE ABILITY No. CORE ABILITIES No.
SN/Z-01.01-1
Released for field testing: August 1999 Version: 1a /first edition 1999
18
SN/Z-01.01-1
Performance Indicators:
• The need for information is established
• The kind of information needed is identified
• A variety of information sources is identified and used as reference (e.g. observation,
people, text, drawings, charts, pictures, database, electronic and non-electronic libraries
and networks)
• Information is located and its appropriateness is determined
• Information is gathered and screened for accuracy and reliability
• Information is compiled and recorded in an appropriate format
Released for field testing: August 1999 Version: 1a/first edition 1999
SN/Z-01.02-1
Performance Indicators:
• The purpose is established
• Information, procedures or processes are examined and screened for relevance and
importance
• The typical format to record/document is identified and applied according to purpose and
target group
• Ethical principal are adhered to (e.g. confidentiality etc.)
• Sources and credits of the information etc. are acknowledged and recorded
• Documents are filed and stored according to established procedures (e.g. filing system,
access rights, etc.)
Released for field testing: August 1999 Version: 1a/first edition 1999
19
SN/Z-01.03-1
Performance Indicators:
• The purpose for the IT application is established
• The operation of computers in a stand-alone (or in a network) environment is demonstrated
• Basic commands of operating system software are applied
• Files and disks are managed
• Suitable software, equipment and tools for the task are selected
• Problems and errors with equipment and software are handled in a measure are systematic
manner
• Computer-virus problems are taken into consideration and counter measures are applied.
• The transfer of concepts, knowledge and skills from one technology to another is carried
out (e.g. paper information to IT- format etc.) according to established formats and quality
standards
• Ethical behaviour in computer use is demonstrated
Released for field testing: August 1999 Version: 1a/first edition 1999
20
SN/Z-01.04-2
Performance Indicators:
• The purpose is established
• The information is observed in systematic manner (e.g. note-taking, skimming, concept
maps, etc.)
• The relevance, importance and reliability is established
• Patterns, interrelationships and trends are identified
• Facts and issues are clarified and established
• Relevant professional, technical and industry standards are met in research methodology
used to examine evidence
• Conclusions are made and are supported by facts
• Findings are recorded and shared with people involved, if necessary
Released for field testing: August 1999 Version: 1a/first edition 1999
SN/Z-01.05-2
Performance Indicators:
• The operation of computer hardware and internet application software is demonstrated
• The information requirements are established
• Appropriate search engines are identified and utilized
• Information is filtered and selected according to requirements
• Safety precautions and virus-protection (e.g. firewall, virus scanning etc.) are adhered to
• Downloaded information is stored in adequate format
• Ethical and legal principles in Internet use are demonstrated
Released for field testing: August 1999 Version: 1a/first edition 1999
21
SN/Z-01.06-2
Performance Indicators:
• Operation of computer in a stand-alone and a network environment is demonstrated
• Files and disks are managed
• Suitable word processing software, equipment and tools for the task are selected
• The format and type of the information is determined
• The transfer of concepts, knowledge and skills from one technology to another is carried
out (e.g. paper information to IT-format, scanning/OCR technology, etc.) according to
established formats and quality standards
• The document is composed, edited and formatted according to the requirements and the
software features (e.g. spell-checking etc.)
• The integration of other software features is demonstrated (e.g. database, spreadsheet,
graphics)
• The document is printed using hardware and software features
• Information is filed/stored, retrieved and back-ups are made according to established
formats and procedures
• Problems and errors with equipment and software are handled in a logical and systematic
manner
• Computer-virus problems are taken into consideration, and counter measures are applied.
• Ethical standards of computer usage are adhered to
Released for field testing: August 1999 Version: 1a/first edition 1999
22
SN/Z-01.07-3
Performance Indicators:
• Operation of computers in a stand-alone and a network environment is demonstrated
• Files and disks are managed
• Suitable database applications, equipment and tools for the task are selected
• The format and type of the information is determined
• The transfer of concepts, knowledge and skills from one technology to another is carried
out (e.g. paper information to IT-format, scanning/OCR technology, etc.) according to
established formats and quality standards
• The information is composed, edited and formatted according to the requirements and the
software features (e.g. filtering, sorting, etc)
• The integration of other software features is demonstrated (e.g. reports, import/export,
spereasheet, graphics)
• The report/database is printed using hardware and software features
• Information is filed/stored, retrieved and back-ups are made according to established
formats and procedures
• Problems and errors with equipment and software are handles in logical and systematic
manner
• Computer-virus problems are taken into consideration, and counter measures are applied
• Ethical standards of computer usage are adhered to
Released for field testing: August 1999 Version: 1a/first edition 1999
23
SN/Z-01.08-3
Performance Indicators:
• Operation of computers in a stand-alone and a network environment is demonstrated
• Files and disks are managed
• Suitable spreadsheet applications, equipment and tools for the task are selected
• The format and type of the information is determined
• The transfer of concepts, knowledge and skills from one technology to another is carried
out (e.g. import of database information, scanning/OCR technology, etc.) according to
established formats and quality standards
• Spreadsheets are composed using mathematical concepts, etc.
• Spreadsheets are tested, edited and formatted according to the requirements, and the
software features (e.g. filtering, sorting, calculations, etc.)
• The integration of other software features is demonstrated (e.g. report, import/export,
database, graphics)
• The spreadsheet is printed using hardware and software features
• Information is filed/stored, retrieved, and back-ups are made according to established
formats and procedures
• Problems and errors with equipment and software are handled in a logical and systematic
manner
• Computer-virus problems are taken into consideration, and counter measures are applied
• Ethical standards of computer usage are adhered to
Released for field testing: August 1999 Version: 1a/first edition 1999
24
SN/Z-01.09-3
Performance Indicators:
• Operation of computers in a stand-alone and a network environment is demonstrated
• Files and disks are managed
• Suitable computer graphics applications, equipment and tools for the task are selected
• The format and type of the graphic information is determined
• The transfer of concepts, knowledge and skills from one technology to another is carried
out ( e.g. import of graphics, scanning technology, etc.) according established formats and
quality standards
• Graphics are composed, edited and formatted according the requirements and the software
features
• The integration of other software features is demonstrated (e.g. import/export, merging with
word processor, desktop publishing etc.)
• The graphics are printed using hardware and software features
• Information is filed/stored, retrieved and back-ups are made according to established
formats and procedures
• Problems and errors with equipment and software are handled in a logical and systematic
manner
• Computer-virus problems are taken into consideration, and counter measures are applied
• Ethical behaviour in computer use is demonstrated
Released for field testing: August 1999 Version: 1a/first edition 1999
25
SN/Z-01.10-3
Performance Indicators:
• The situation that requires mathematics is identified
• Potential mathematical strategies are assessed (including models, geometric
representations of formulas, elementary algebraic equations, descriptive statistical
methods, and mathematical reasoning) for suitability and effectiveness
• The degree of accuracy for the answers is established
• Estimations to answers are made
• Mathematical operations to implement selected strategies are executed
• Appropriate technology and tools are utilized (e.g. calculator, computers, spreadsheets, etc)
• Numerical answers are checked for errors and the appropriate fit between problem and
answers
• The transfer of mathematical strategies from one situation to another is demonstrated.
Released for field testing: August 1999 Version: 1a/first edition 1999
26
SN/Z-01.11-3
Performance Indicators:
• The subject under discussions is clearly identified
• Distinctions between facts and opinion are established
• Inferences and relations to other sources of information are recognized
• A variety of sources is utilized to synthesize information
• Rules or principles underlying relationships between objects are identified and applied to
problem solving
• Alternative solutions, processes or decisions are formulated and its potential consequences
are identified
• Viewpoints/arguments are supported with reasons and evidence and feedback form others
is considered
• The transfer of thinking strategies from one situation to another is demonstrated
• Behaviour is consistent with the ethical standards within and occupation or profession
Released for field testing: August 1999 Version: 1a/first edition 1999
27
SN/Z-02.01-1
Performance Indicators:
• The purpose of information is identified
• The source is identified and required information is obtained (e.g. people, text, drawings,
charts, maps, pictures, database, electronic and non-electronic libraries and networks,
videos, etc.)
• Strategic for reading, listening, observing effectively are demonstrated (note-taking, asking
for clarification, looking up unfamiliar terms, etc.)
• Understanding of the instructions is demonstrated through appropriate actions or
applications
Released for field testing: August 1999 Version: 1a/first edition 1999
SN/Z-02.02-1
Performance Indicators:
• The purpose of the telecommunication is established
• The appropriate medium of telecommunication is selected (e.g.telephone, fax, e-mail,
voice-mail)
• The contact particular are identified (e.g. name, company, telephone/fax etc ) and updated
• Skills in the operation of telecommunication equipment is demonstrated (e.g. special
features, call forwarding, fax polling, etc.)
• Calls are received and screened/forwarded
• Established telephone etiquette is adhered to
• Effective listening and speaking skills are demonstrated using acceptable language
• Information exchanged is clear and accurate with necessary details and clarification
• Message are recorded and forwarded according to established procedure
Released for field testing: August 1999 Version: 1a/first edition 1999
28
SN/Z-02.03-1
Performance Indicators:
• Thoughts and information are expressed clearly and concisely
• The choice of words /jargon is adjusted to meet the needs of others
• Effective listening skills and feedback is demonstrated
• The impact of non-vertical communication and cultural diversity is taken into account (e.g.
body language)
• Options to overcome language difference or difficulties are utilized (e.g. using of signs,
sketching, etc.)
• Appropriate recording methods are utilized (note-taking, recording devices)
Released for field testing: August 1999 Version: 1a/first edition 1999
SN/Z-02.04-1
Performance Indicators:
• The purpose is established
• The appropriate format/standard from is selected according to established procedures
• The necessary information/data is identified, verified and assembled
• Appropriate language/jargon is used
• The information is checked before submission
• Established deadlines for submission are met
Released for field testing: August 1999 Version: 1a/first edition 1999
29
SN/Z-02.05-1
Performance Indicators:
• The purpose of the graphic information is established
• The meaning of symbols and signs is understood and clarified (e.g. making inquiries, using
dictionaries, legends, etc.)
• Strategies to read and observe effectively are demonstrated (note-taking, asking for
clarification, looking up unfamiliar terms/symbols, etc.)
• Understanding of the graphic instructions is demonstrated through appropriate actions and
feedback.
Released for field testing: August 1999 Version: 1a/first edition 1999
30
SN/Z-02.06-2
Performance Indicators:
• The purpose of communication is established
• Information sources are identified (e.g. notes, data, etc )
• Addressee is identified
• Ideas and information are gathered, organized and compiled
• Format is established (handwritten, typed, word processing)
• Appropriate writing tools are utilized. (e.g. word processor)
• A clear and concise language and tone is used
• Standard rules of language and structure (jargon, grammar, spelling, punctuation) are
applied.
• The information is checked before submission
• File copies are produced and filed
• Established deadlines for submissions are met.
Released for field testing: August 1999 Version: 1a/first edition 1999
31
SN/Z-02.07-2
Performance Indicators:
• The source operation of computer hardware and LAN/Intranet application software is
demonstrated
• The information requirements are established
• Access is established according to established procedures (addressee ID, password, ID,
access rights)
• Information is transmitted and received
• Date safely precautions and virus-protection (e.g. firewall, etc) are adhered to
• Information is stored in an adequate format
• Ethical principles in LAN use are demonstrated
Released for field testing: August 1999 Version: 1a/first edition 1999
32
SN/Z-02.08-2
Performance Indicators:
• The purpose is established
• Information sources are identified (e.g. notes, date, observation, etc.)
• Original ideas and information are gathered, organised, compiled and verified
• Appropriate graphic format is selected according to the purpose and suitability for the
reader (complexity, familiarity)
• Appropriate tools and technology are utilized (e.g. computer graphics applications software,
etc.)
• Standard rules of graphic language and structure (symbols, icons, etc.) are applied
• The graphic information is checked for consistency of meaning with the original before
submission
• File copies are produced and filed
• Established deadlines for submission are met
Released for field testing: August 1999 Version: 1a/first edition 1999
33
SN/Z-02.09-3
Performance Indicators:
• The purpose is established
• Information sources are identified (e.g. process data, observations, etc.)
• Original ideas and information are gathered, organized, compiled and verified
• Appropriate flowchart format is selected according to the purpose and suitable to the reader
(complexity, familiarity)
• Appropriate tools and technology are utilized (e.g. computer flowchart applications software
etc.)
• Standard rules of flowchart language and structure (symbols, icons, etc.) are applied.
• The flowchart information is checked for consistency of meaning with the original idea
before submission
• File copies are produced and filed
• Established deadlines for submission are met
Released for field testing: August 1999 Version: 1a/first edition 1999
34
SN/Z-02.10-3
Performance Indicators:
• The purpose is established
• Information sources are identified (e.g. notes, technical data, abservations, etc.)
• Original ideas and information are gathered, organized, compiled and verified.
• Appropriate language and format is selected according to the purpose and suitability for the
reader (complexity, familiarity)
• Appropriate tools and technology are utilized (e.g. computer word processor, graphics
applications software, scanners, etc.)
• A clear and concise language and tone is used
• Standard rules of language and structure (jargon, grammar, spelling, punctuation) are
applied
• Complex structures are re-framed using visual, numerical and symbolic representations
(maps, drawings pictures, charts, etc.)
• The information is checked for consistency of meaning with the original before submission
• File copies are produced and filed
• Established deadlines for submission are met
Released for field testing: August 1999 Version: 1a/first edition 1999
35
SN/Z-02.11-3
Performance Indicators:
• The purpose is established
• Individual and cultural differences are recognized and taken into account
• Information and ideas are presented in a concise, organized way, with clearly stated
objectives and conclusions
• Information and ideas are presented in a way which meets the needs of others and is
expressed in terms suited to them
• Messages are easily understood through use of plain, clear language suited to the receiver
• Complex concepts or arguments are presented effectively through organization of material
(e.g. visuals) and choice of language suited to the receiver
• People are given the opportunity to seek clarification through questions and answers
• Receivers are encouraged to provide feedback.
Released for field testing: August 1999 Version: 1a/first edition 1999
SN/Z-03.01-1
Performance Indicators:
• The beliefs and customs of various ethnic groups are recognized
• An understanding and respect for the sensitivities in various cultural groups is maintained
• Effect of cultural differences within teams is considered
• Cultural, ethnic and gender sensitivity is demonstrated
• Behaviour that reduce tension, social isolation and prejudice are exhibited
Released for field testing: August 1999 Version: 1a/first edition 1999
36
SN/Z-03.02-1
Performance Indicators:
• An understanding of the concept of honesty and integrity is demonstrated
• Commitments to and personal undertakings with clients and colleagues are consistently
honoured
• Official information is used in a way which maintains confidentiality
• Privacy principles are adopted and complied with
• Established standards and codes of practice are adhered to
Released for field testing: August 1999 Version: 1a/first edition 1999
SN/Z-03.03-1
03.03 Ability: Accept responsibility for own work and work Level: 1
area
Performance Indicators:
• The work area is kept clean and safe according to set standards and policies
• Tasks are completed to the standard expected in the workplace
• Work is self monitored according to requirements for job quality, timelines, resources use
and protection of environment
• Appropriate work site locations, facilities and equipment are used to complete assigned
tasks
Released for field testing: August 1999 Version: 1a/first edition 1999
37
SN/Z-03.04-1
Performance Indicators:
• Work performance is discussed on a regular basis with supervisor/team members
• Constructive criticism is accepted
• Strategies for improvement, agreed at feedback meetings with supervisors and others, are
implemented within a determined time frame
• Suggestions for areas of self development are sought from supervisors, staff members and
clients
Released for field testing: August 1999 Version: 1a/first edition 1999
SN/Z-03.05-1
Performance Indicators:
• Work is performed in accord with Occupational Health and Safety policies and rules
• Hazardous chemicals and goods are used, moved, stored and disposed of, in accord with
OH & S policies/rules
• Apparent hazards are reported to supervisor and/or safety officer in a timely and
appropriate way
• Emergency and evacuation procedures are known and workplace can be evacuated with
due regard to safety of people and environment
Released for field testing: August 1999 Version: 1a/first edition 1999
38
SN/Z-03.06-1
Performance Indicators:
• Individual and cultural differences are recognized and taken into account
• Responses are adjusted to meet the needs of others
• Issues and ideas are raised and addressed assertively when interacting with others both
individually and in a group
• Inquiries are referred to other sources when it is appropriate
Released for field testing: August 1999 Version: 1a/first edition 1999
SN/Z-03.07-1
Performance Indicators:
• The nature of the conflict and parties involved are identified
• An attempt is made to maintain communication
• Problems are clarified
• Possible solution are examined, discussed or proposed
• Reasonable compromises are offered/reached
• A win-win situation is sought to resolve disputes
• The impact of assertive, aggressive and passive behaviour is identified in the prevention
and de-fusing of conflicts
• A mediator is involved to interact in deadlock situations when necessary
Released for field testing: August 1999 Version: 1a/first edition 1999
39
SN/Z-03.08-2
Performance Indicators:
• An understanding of the contributions of others to the work group is demonstrated
• Assistance is offered to others in the work group when appropriate
• Assistance is accepted when offered by other team members
• An understanding of individual and cultural differences when working with others in the
work group is displayed
• Constructive suggestions are made in meetings of the work group
• Issues are raised and pursued assertively within the work group
• The requirements and views of others in the work group are considered when solving
problems
• An understanding of how work group decisions are made is demonstrated
• Others are informed of developments affecting their work functions
Released for field testing: August 1999 Version: 1a/first edition 1999
SN/Z-03.09-3
Performance Indicators:
• Regular, constructive feedback on each staff member’s performance is given through both
formal both formal and informal processes, based on mutually agreed performance
expectations
• Performance problems are addressed in a fair, constructive and timely manner in
accordance with relevant guidelines and procedures
• Strategies for the improvement of performance are discussed and implemented (e.g.
training activities)
Released for field testing: August 1999 Version: 1a/first edition 1999
40
SN/Z-03.10-3
Performance Indicators:
• Personal and cultural differences are taken into account when dealing with staff
• Day-to-day supervision and guidance of staff is undertaken in accordance with principles of
equity and non-discrimination using counselling practices
• Counselling skills are used in formal and informal counselling sessions in accordance with
organizational policies
• Standard of professional and ethical behaviour for employees are set by the example of
their superiors
• Work contributions or suggestions from staff are continually sought and encouraged
Released for field testing: August 1999 Version: 1a/first edition 1999
SN/Z-03.11-3
Performance Indicators:
• Performance standards and expectations are established and explained to staff
• Regular, constructive feedback on each staff member’s performance is given through both
formal and informal processes, based on mutually agreed performance expectations
• Constructive feedback on group/team performance is given through both formal and
informal processes
• Performance problems are addressed in a fair, constructive and timely manner in
accordance with relevant guidelines and procedures
• Records of performance evaluation/performance appraisal are updated according to
established procedures
• Proposal to upgrade performance are discussed with candidates or team
Released for field testing: August 1999 Version: 1a/first edition 1999
41
SN/Z-03.12-3
Performance Indicators:
• Training needs of the staff in the area are identified, assessed and recorded
• On-the-job training is provided to the requirement standard
• The application of information concerning the job and it’s relevance to task is explained and
conveyed to relevant parties
• Learning opportunities are provided to allow staff to develop relevant skills
• Staff are encouraged to attend training courses and to take up other development
opportunities
• Work group goals are met by the provision of technical supervision or guidance
• Training is used as a means of resolving problems in the work area
Released for field testing: August 1999 Version: 1a/first edition 1999
SN/Z-03.13-3
Performance Indicators:
• Team goals are established according to company policies and procedures
• Hierarchy and operating procedures are established and understood by team members
• Cooperation in the workplace is actively fostered through appropriate work allocation
• The appreciation of all achievement is demonstrated
• Team members are encouraged to share information, ideas and opinions
• Conflict is identified (e.g. assertive, aggressive or passive behaviour) and resolved with
minimum disruption to work group function
• Cultural differences are taken into account when dealing with conflicts in a cross-cultural
setting
• Active participation of team members in team building and problem solving activities is
fostered
Released for field testing: August 1999 Version: 1a/first edition 1999
42
SN/Z-03.14-3
Performance Indicators:
• Goals and politics are established and explained to team
• Positions and areas of responsibility are established and logically justified
• Credibility and leadership is established through competence and integrity
• Work contributions or suggestions from staff are sought and encouraged
• Suggestions are accepted, or rejected in a constructive manner
• Work flow and practices are established, utilizing the skills of the team members
• Staff are provided with support guidance and supervision necessary to perform work safely
and successfully
• Conflict between staff members is addressed in accordance to personnel practices
Released for field testing: August 1999 Version: 1a/first edition 1999
SN/Z-03.15-3
Performance Indicators:
• The purpose is established
• Contact (peers, bosses, subordinates, clients, period contractors, and/or suppliers) are
identified for formal and informal liaison in relation to the work
• Informal communication channels within and outside the organization are developed and
maintained
• Spoken and written message are easily understood through use of plain, clear language
suited to the receiver
• Complex concepts or arguments are presented affectively through the organization of
material and choice of language which is suited to the receiver
• Issues are negotiated with key parties in a way which works towards an established
outcome
• Outcomes are recorded
Released for field testing: August 1999 Version: 1a/first edition 1999
43
SN/Z-03.16-3
Performance Indicators:
• Client needs and expectations are defined and checked with the client to ensure they are
accurate
• Client needs are assessed against product or service provider’s capacity to meet them
• Feedback from client is sought in regard to his level of satisfaction with services/products
provided
• Problems are resolved without disruption to work and/or brought to the client’s attention
where necessary
• Clients are advised of actions to be taken to facilitate the completion of work
Released for field testing: August 1999 Version: 1a/first edition 1999
SN/Z-03.17-3
Performance Indicators:
• Job profiles are established and discussed with staff
• Competency development requirements are assessed in accordance with established staff
development plans
• Training needs of staff are identified and discussed with relevant staff members
• Training strategies are developed and discussed with parties concerned
• Training needs are referred to training providers (on-the-job and off-the-job training)
• On-the-job training provided to the required standard
• Staff are encouraged to attend training courses and to take advantage of other
development opportunities
• Training is recommended/coordinated in accordance with identified needs, organizational
policy and work flow requirements
• Application of new skills and knowledge in the workplace is encouraged and supported
• The effectiveness of training measures is monitored and recorded
Released for field testing: August 1999 Version: 1a/first edition 1999
44
SN/Z-04.01-2
Performance Indicators:
• The nature of work is assessed
• The desired outcome and constraints are determined
• The appropriate technology or method is identified
• Priorities are set before the work commences in consultation with others
• Effective time management techniques are used to meet priorities on time
• Work deadlines are established and work is completed within a specified time
• Priorities/deadlines are reviewed regularly and work altered according to review
• Responsibility for judgments and decisions is exercised in accordance with the established
level of accountability (*advanced levels only)
• Professional and technical standards of excellence are adhered to
Released for field testing: August 1999 Version: 1a/first edition 1999
SN/Z-04.02-2
04.02 Ability: Set and revise own objectives and goals Level: 2
Performance Indicators:
• Reasonable/realistic work results or client needs are identified
• Objectives/action plans are stated as measurable targets with clear time frames
• The efficient usage of resources (e.g. money, space, technology, time) is established
• The work performance and usage of resources is determined
• Areas for improvement are identified
• Personal training needs to achieve goals are discussed with supervisors
• Action is taken to revise goals and objectives
Released for field testing: August 1999 Version: 1a/first edition 1999
45
SN/Z-04.03-2
Performance Indicators:
• Workplace and equipment are adjusted to suit the ergonomic requirements of the work
environment
• Equipment is used safely in accordance with Occupational Health and Safety standards
and operating guidelines
• Faulty/defective equipment and/or tools are identified and reported to issuing officer/
supervisor
• Good house-keeping standards are established
• Maintenance is carried out in accordance with standard workplace operating procedures
and/or in accordance with manufacturers specifications
Released for field testing: August 1999 Version: 1a/first edition 1999
SN/Z-04.04-2
Performance Indicators:
• Problems as such are identified (i.e. identifying a discrepancy between what is and what
should be)
• Possible reasons for the problem are identified
• Inductive or deductive reasoning is applied to identify the cause of and possible solutions to
problems
• Alternatives and their consequences in relation to the problem are identified
• Possible solutions to the problem are explored using a variety of resources
• Advantages and disadvantages of each solution are determined
• Appropriate action is determined and discussed
• Appropriate action is implemented and its results are evaluated and shared with relevant
parties
Released for field testing: August 1999 Version: 1a/first edition 1999
46
SN/Z-04.05-2
Performance Indicators:
• The task is identified
• Problems or challenges requiring changes in procedures or processes are identified
• Alternative work methods are identified and suggested
• Willingness to take on new tasks is demonstrated
• Work practices are modified to adapt to change
• Possible options are taken into account when following instructions
• Suggestions for improving work practices are communicated to others
• Problems in carrying out instructions or completing work are identified and communicated
to others
Released for field testing: August 1999 Version: 1a/first edition 1999
SN/Z-04.06-3
Performance Indicators:
• Individual work assignments are identified
• Work is allocated so that it can be completed within a specified time and budget
• The requirements to achieve specified quality standards are determined (e.g. ISO 9000)
• Instructions are communicated taking into account the individual differences and skills of
staff
• Feedback and advices is provided to staff about tasks, work methods and performance
standards (time and quality)
Released for field testing: August 1999 Version: 1a/first edition 1999
47
SN/Z-04.07-3
Performance Indicators:
• Objectives and strategies are drafted
• Parties concerned are identified
• Tasks, roles, and responsibility of the parties involved are drafted
• Parties are informed and invited/involved in the planning and implementation processes
• Plans are presented in a format appropriate to the audience and in a way which gains their
support (create win-win situations)
• Reasonable compromises are negotiated
• The results/decisions are incorporated into the planning/implementation process
Released for field testing: August 1999 Version: 1a/first edition 1999
SN/Z-04.08-4
Performance Indicators:
• The nature and complexity of the work is identified
• Particular competency requirements for staff members are identified
• Employees’ skills knowledge and experience are all considered when matching staff
members to tasks
• Staff training and development are considered
• The availability of staff is discussed with the parties involved (e.g. staff, supervisors, HR
department, etc.)
• Job profiles for additional staff are identified and discussed with respective parties
• Occupational Health and Safety matters and hazards that may arise on the job are taken
into account
• Staffing plans are generated and forwarded to parties involved
Released for field testing: August 1999 Version: 1a/first edition 1999
48
SN/Z-04.09-4
Performance Indicators:
• Plans are developed which are consistent with and linked to the company’s objectives
• A timeline for work to progress is established which identifies the methods to be employed
and milestones against which progress can later be checked
• Relevant personnel, including other supervisors and staff, are consulted as part of the
planning process
• Plans are developed in accordance with accepted organization practice and procedures
(e.g. use technology, computers and software, database systems)
• Materials, services and equipment are identified
• Plans reflect an optimum use of available resources over a designated time frame
• Plans and evaluations are communicated to others within the organization as necessary
• Plans are prepared in accordance with relevant legislation, standards and guidelines
• Occupational Health and Safety matters and any special hazards (e.g. environmental
impact, etc.) are identified
Released for field testing: August 1999 Version: 1a/first edition 1999
SN/Z-04.10-4
Performance Indicators:
• Scientific principles in problem-solving and decision-making are identified and applied
• Appropriate application of mathematics to the collection, analysis and use of information is
demonstrated
• Technology and equipment used to analyse, simulate, and solve problems are utilized (e.g.
computers, experts systems, database systems etc.)
• Appropriate application of technology to provide services etc. is demonstrated
Released for field testing: August 1999 Version: 1a/first edition 1999
49
SN/Z-05.01-3
Performance Indicators:
• Details of work plans are communicated to others within organization when required
• Resources are acquired, allocated and used to meet agreed project objectives, according to
plan
• Work methods are designed and organized to meet job, client and staff requirements
• Materials and equipment are provided promptly to employees
• Risk factors are identified and contingency plans for allocation of resources are developed
and maintained
• Safety equipment etc. required for work is acquired and provided to employees
• Work plans are monitored according to regulations
• Work conforms to prior estimates and any variations have been costed
• Monitoring result and evaluations are communicated to others within the organization as
required
Released for field testing: August 1999 Version: 1a/first edition 1999
50
SN/Z-05.02-3
Performance Indicators:
• Work specifications are established
• Work is inspected in accordance with established standards in compliance with quality,
safety, and time/budget requirements
• Work-in-progress and/or completed is checked and recorded accurately for consistency
with original job requirements and any subsequent variations
• Work is certified in accordance with established standards
• Problems and variations to work are identified and promptly communicated to employees
and others in the organization
• Effective solutions are selected and developed to overcome problems, so that remedial
action is taken when necessary
• Verbal and/or written reports on the progress of the work are provided to clients and others
when required
Released for field testing: August 1999 Version: 1a/first edition 1999
51
SN/Z-05.03-4
Performance Indicators:
• Resources and budget are identified and verified
• Resources are acquired and deployed promptly in accordance with relevant guidelines
• Work plans reflect an optimum use of available resources over a designated time frame
• Records of resources allocation and usage are current and are completed according to
relevant guidelines and procedures
• Systems which enable timely collection, management and processing of information are
utilized and maintained
• Potential for overspending is identified and remedial action taken when required
• Expenditure is made within approved budget
• Established prices are reflected on invoices/bills
• Costs associated with work are reported in accordance with organization practices and
procedures
• Established prices paid for services/product are at or below the generally accepted market
price
• Established prices are in line with period contracts or individually negotiated prices
Released for field testing: August 1999 Version: 1a/first edition 1999
52
SN/Z-05.04-4
Performance Indicators:
• Hierarchy and authority is established
• Areas of responsibility and authority for the respective parties are identified
• Existence of individual and cultural differences are recognized and taken into account
• Tasks to be delegated are defined and are within the competence of staff
• Training requirements are identified and access to training is provided in a timely manner
• Delegation of responsibilities is supported by appropriate authority
• Parties concerned with the delegation of responsibilities/ authority are informed
• A monitoring/report system is established
Released for field testing: August 1999 Version: 1a/first edition 1999
SN/Z-05.05-4
Performance Indicators:
• Contracts or tender are called for and approved in accordance with established guidelines
and standards
• Tender specifications and documents are prepared in accordance with established
guidelines
• Bids are received in accordance with contract and tender guidelines
• Bids are processed within specified time and budget constraints
• Applications are evaluated against agreed specifications
• Accepted tender is monitored and assessed against document specifications and permitted
variations are incorporated
• Contract or tender is completed within accepted tender cost and time constraints to the
organization’s or client’s satisfaction
Released for field testing: August 1999 Version: 1a/first edition 1999
53
SN/Z-06.01-1
Performance Indicators:
• Social, organizational and technological systems in the workplace are established
• The relationships between system structures and goals is recognized
• Demands from the systems/organization are recognized and responded to
• The need to operate effectively within social, organizational and technological systems is
accepted and demonstrated
• The acceptance of formal and informal codes of social / organizational systems is
demonstrated
Released for field testing: August 1999 Version: 1a/first edition 1999
SN/Z-06.02-1
Performance Indicators:
• An understanding of hierarchy and authority is demonstrated
• The roles and the contributions of others to the work process is identified
• An understanding of the own role and responsibilities is demonstrated
• Guidance is sought when it is required
• The acceptance of authority is demonstrated
• Information on where to find things/people to get job done is shared with the work team
Released for field testing: August 1999 Version: 1a/first edition 1999
54
SN/Z-06.03-1
Performance Indicators:
• An understanding of established procedures and quality standards is demonstrated
• A monitoring system is established
• Procedures and system performance are monitored
• Discrepancies between reality and expectations are recognized
• Attempts are made to identify the root of the problem and to correct problems within
established guidelines
• Appropriate personnel is informed about situations and problems
Released for field testing: August 1999 Version: 1a/first edition 1999
SN/Z-06.04-1
Performance Indicators:
• Current skills and knowledge or set of competencies are assessed
• Situations are recognized which require adaptation of skills or competencies
• Competencies required for new situation or systems are identified and plans are made to
acquire them
• Goals are established for broadening the scope of competencies for personal and
employment purpose
• Assistance is sought to transfer competencies to new situations if necessary
Released for field testing: August 1999 Version: 1a/first edition 1999
55
SN/Z-06.05-2
Performance Indicators:
• The system is identified and investigated
• The function of different parts of machines or systems is identified
• Interdependencies and interactions with other machines, technologies or systems are
investigated
• A variety of techniques and sources are employed to collect and organize information (e.g.
computers, observations, manuals, charts, SOP, experts, etc.)
• Cause and effect of technical systems is analysed
• Conclusions are discussed and recorded in an appropriate format (e.g. chart, drawings,
reports)
• Verbal and/or written reports are provided to clients and others as needed
Released for field testing: August 1999 Version: 1a/first edition 1999
56
SN/Z-06.06-2
Performance Indicators:
• The technical system is identified and performance criteria are established
• Performance criteria is interpreted and verified
• Performance information is collected using appropriate methods and technology (e.g.
observation, instrumentation, computers, etc)
• Information is converted into an appropriate format for comparison (e.g. charts, graphs,
tables, etc)
• Numerical and/or logical concepts are applied to interpret data and information
(mathematics, statistics, etc)
• Trends in the performance of systems are established
• Conclusions are discussed and recorded
• Effective solutions are selected or developed to overcome problems, and remedial action is
taken where necessary
• Verbal and/or written reports are provided to clients and others as needed
Released for field testing: August 1999 Version: 1a/first edition 1999
57
SN/Z-06.07-3
Performance Indicators:
• The need and purpose for networks (personal contacts) is identified
• Mutual interests or needs are identified
• Contacts (peers, bosses, subordinates, clients, period contractors, and/or suppliers) are
identified for formal and informal liaison in relation to work
• Informal communication channels within and outside the organization are developed and
maintained
• Opportunities to meet and exchange information and ideas are created or utilized (formal
and informal settings, events, Internet, etc)
Released for field testing: August 1999 Version: 1a/first edition 1999
58
SN/Z-06.08-4
Performance Indicators:
• The technology to be applied is identified and investigated
• Environmental protection laws and regulations are identified
• Restrictions for the use of specific technologies or processes are determined
• The effects of technology on the natural and social environment are considered
• A variety of techniques and sources are employed to collect and organize information on
the effects (e.g. computers, observations, manuals, charts, SOP, experts, simulations, etc)
• Cause and effect of technology on natural environment is analysed
• Cause and effect of technology on social environment is analysed
• Any negative impact of technology or system on the environment is identified
• Alternative technologies are investigated to minimize the environmental impact
• Conclusions are discussed and recorded in an appropriate format (e.g. chart, drawings,
reports)
• Verbal and/or written reports are provided to respective parties as needed or required by
law.
Released for field testing: August 1999 Version: 1a/first edition 1999
59
Appendix
Since CORE ABILITIES are connected to all SKM levels, some performance indicators for the
application of academic and related skills are provided for field testing.
• Applied Mathematics
• Locating Information
• Reading for Information
• Applied Technology
• Listening/Speaking
• Writing
• Teamwork
• Problem Solving
Sources:
The “Levels of Work Keys” described in this document are based on American College
Testing (ATC) Work Keys Score Interpretation Guide, modified and adapted to the
Malaysian Skill Certification System SKM Levels 1 – 5.
The definition for “Problem Solving” are adapted from Hay Group, Hay Guide chart for
evaluating Problem Solving.
60
Applied Mathematics
Applied Mathematics measures skill in applying mathematical reasoning to work-related
problems. There are five levels of complexity, 3 through 7, with Level 3 being the least
complex and Level 7 the most complex.
The levels build on each other, each incorporating the skills of the preceding levels.
61
Work Key Level 7 applicable to SKM Level 4 to 5
• Solve problems requiring multiple steps of logic and calculation.
• Solve problems involving more than one unknown, non-linear functions (e.g. rate of
change) and applications of basic statistical concepts (e.g. error of measurement).
• Locate errors in multiple-step calculations.
• Solve problem with unusual content or format or with incomplete or implicit information.
Locating Information
Locating Information measures skill in using information taken from workplace graphics
such as diagrams, blueprints, floor plans, tables, forms, graphs, charts and instrument
gauges.
There are four levels of complexity, 3 through 6, with Level 3 being the least complex and
Level 6 the most complex. The levels build on each other, each incorporating the skills of
the preceding levels.
62
Reading for Information
Reading for Information measures skill in reading and understanding work-related reading
materials. There are five levels of complexity, 3 through 7, with Level 3 being the least
complex and Level 7 the most complex.
Although Level 3 is the least complex, it still represents a level of reading skill well above
“no skill at all”. The levels build on each other, each incorporating the skills of the
preceding levels.
63
Work Key Level 7 applicable to SKM Level 4 to 5
• Recognize the definitions of difficult, uncommon jargon or technical terms from context.
• Generalize from a passage to situations neither described in nor completely similar to
those in a passage.
Applied Technology
Applied Technology measure skills in solving problems of a technological nature, involving
the basic principles of mechanics, electricity, fluid dynamics and thermodynamics as they
apply to machines and equipment found in the workplace. There are four levels of
complexity, 3 through 6, with Level 3 being the least complex and Level 6 the most
complex.
Although Level 3 is the least complex, it still represents a level of applied technology skill
well above “no skill at all”. The levels build on each other, each incorporating the skills of
the preceding levels.
64
• Solve problems involving one or more tools or systems having a wide range of
complexity.
• Apply difficult physical principles.
• Understand and correctly interpret the interaction of several complex systems.
Listening/Speaking/Oral Communications
Listening measures skills in listening to and understanding work-related messages;
receiving information from customers, co-workers, or suppliers; and then writing down the
information to communicate it to someone else. Learners demonstrate their ability to
distinguish and communicate critical information and non-critical information. Critical
information consists of those details that the recipient of the message must have in order
to understand the message or act upon it (e.g. names, phone numbers, addresses, times).
Non-critical information can improve a message by providing details that further explain
the message or its tone, but the absence of this non-critical information does not interfere
with the recipient’s ability to understand and accurately act upon the message. Each
Listening level describes the content and quality of messages learners write to describe
an audio message.
Level 0
• No meaningful information or totally inaccurate information.
Level 1
• Minimal pertinent information; enough context to provide clues as to gist of situation or
source of further information.
65
Work Key Level 5 applicable to SKM Level 4 to 5
• All critical information is present and correct; response conveys insight into situation
through tone and/or subtle details.
Writing
Writing measures skill at writing work-related messages; receiving information from
customers, co-workers, or suppliers; and then writing down the information to
communicate it to someone else. Each Writing level rates the writing mechanics (such as
sentence structure and grammar) and writing style of messages learners write to
describe an audio message.
Level 0
• An attempt is made at the message, but the message is completely garbled with no
recognizable sentence structure.
Level 1
• Message conveyed inadequately; overall lack of proper sentence structure.
66
Teamwork
Teamwork measures skill in choosing behaviour and/or actions that simultaneously
support team inter-relationships and lead towards the accomplishment of work tasks.
There are four levels of complexity, 3 through 6, with Level 3 being the least complex and
Level 6 the most complex.
Although Level 3 is the least complex, it still represents a level of teamwork skill well above
“no skill at all”. The levels build on each other, each incorporating the skills of the
preceding levels.
67
Problem Solving
Problem Solving is the ‘self starting’ thinking required by the job, which is used for
analysing, evaluating, creating, reasoning, arriving at and drawing conclusions. To the
extend that thinking is circumscribed by the standards or covered by procedures, or
referred to others.
Problem Solving has two dimensions:
A. The environment in which thinking takes place
B. The challenge presented by the thinking to be done
68
4) Adaptive: (SKM L 4)
Situations requiring analytical interpretative, and/or constructive thinking and a
significant degree of evaluative judgment.
5) Uncharted: (SKM L 5)
Pathfinding situations requiring creative thinking and the development of new
concepts and approaches contributing significantly to the advancement of
knowledge and thought.
69
REKOD PENILAIAN KUMULITIF (RPK) - TEORI Helaian 1 drp. 1
SIJIL KEMAHIRAN MALAYSIA (SKM): NCS – CORE ABILITIES (TAHAP 1)
Dilantik Sebagai : Pegawai Pengesah Dalaman Pegawai Penilai/Tenaga Pegawai Penilai/Tenaga Pegawai Penilai/Tenaga
Pengajar Pengajar Pengajar
Nama:
Contoh T/Tangan:
Z-009-1(M01) Work Place Safety Z-009-1(M02) Organizational Structure Z-009-1(M03) Work Within System
03.05 Markah Penilaian Teori: 06.02 Markah Penilaian Teori: 06.01 Markah Penilaian Teori:
06.04