Edgescience 46

Edge Science
Number 46 June 2021
Current Research and Insights
Past-Life Memories in
Near-Death Experiences
UFOs, Psychical Research, and Religion
Interview with Garret Moddel
Wonder in Science
A publication of the
EdgeScience #46
June 2021
EdgeScience is a quarterly magazine.
Print copies are available from
edgescience.magcloud.com.
CONTENTS
For further information, see edgescience.org.
3
Email: edgescience@scientificexploration.org
THE OBSERVATORY
Why EdgeScience? Because, contrary to public Wonder in Science
perception, scientific knowledge is still full of unknowns.
By Vlad Glaveanu
What remains to be discovered — what we don’t
know — very likely dwarfs what we do know. And
what we think we know may not be entirely correct
or fully understood. Anomalies, which researchers
tend to sweep under the rug, should be actively pursued
as clues to potential breakthroughs and new directions
in science.
PUBLISHER: The Society for Scientific Exploration

EDITOR: Patrick Huyghe FEATURE
5
ASSOCIATE EDITOR: P.D. Moncrief Jr.
CONTRIBUTORS: Vlad Glaveanu, Bruce Greyson, Claims of
Michael Grosso, Gayle Kimball
DESIGN: Smythtype Design Past-Life Memories
in Near-Death
The Society for Scientific Exploration (SSE) is a Experiences
professional organization of scientists and scholars
By Bruce Greyson
who study unusual and unexplained phenomena. The
primary goal of the Society is to provide a professional
forum for presentations, criticism, and debate
concerning topics which are for various reasons
ignored or studied inadequately within mainstream
science. A secondary goal is to promote improved
understanding of those factors that unnecessarily limit
THE INTERVIEW
10
the scope of scientific inquiry, such as sociological
constraints, restrictive world views, hidden theoretical Garret Moddel on
assumptions, and the temptation to convert Experiments in Psi and
prevailing theory into prevailing dogma. Topics under
investigation cover a wide spectrum. At one end are
New Energy Technologies
apparent anomalies in well established disciplines. By Gayle H. Kimball
At the other, we find paradoxical phenomena that
belong to no established discipline and therefore may
offer the greatest potential for scientific advancement
and the expansion of human knowledge. The SSE
was founded in 1982 and has approximately 800
17
members in 45 countries worldwide. The Society
also publishes the peer-reviewed Journal of Scientific
Exploration, and holds annual meetings in the U.S. and REFERENCE POINT
biennial meetings in Europe. Associate and student The New Story: UFOs, Psychical Research, and Religion
memberships are available to the public. To join the By Michael Grosso
Society, or for more information, visit the website at
scientificexploration.org.
Editor’s Note: The subjects we deal with in EdgeScience are often difficult
PRESIDENT: William Bengston, St. Joseph’s College to illustrate without using cliché images. So this time we have decided to use
VICE PRESIDENT: Garret Moddel, University of Colorado, some abstract art that, in our view at least, reflect the subjects at hand. The
Boulder interior images this issue are courtesy Phillip Wang who used a Generative
SECRETARY: Mark Urban-Lurain, Michigan State
Adversarial Network (GAN) to create images of artwork that don’t actually
University
exist. These images appeared on the site This Artwork Does Not Exist:
TREASURER: York Dobyns
thisartworkdoesnotexist.com. For more information, see “You can be the first
EDUCATION OFFICER: Chantal Toporow
EUROPEAN COORDINATOR: Anders Rydberg (and) only person to see these works of art,” by Popkin, Boing Boing, May 8, 2021.
Copyright © 2021 Society for Scientific Exploration

The authors, artists, and photographers retain copyright to their work. Cover: Vizerskaya/iStock
ISSN 2330-4545 (Print)
ISSN 2330-4553 (Online)
EDGESCIENCE
EDGESCIENCE
#31 • SEPTEMBER
#46 • JUNE 2021
2017 / 3
❛ THE OBSERVATORY ❜
Vlad P. Glăveanu
Wonder in Science
I t is hardly surprising that scientific work is eminently cre-
ative. Using the “traditional,” product-based definition of
creativity,1 the theories and findings of science demonstrate
both novelty and originality, on the one hand, and a certain
degree of effectiveness in solving problems (even when these
problems are primarily conceptual), on the other. However,
scientific work itself cannot be reduced to its outcomes, for as
creative and valuable as these are. In order to fully understand
what makes science creative—and, I would argue, what makes
science science—we need to delve deeper into the nature of
the creative process of scientists. From the start, we are faced
with the realization that there is no single way of being creative
in science (and any other domain of human activity for this
matter), 2 just as the products of scientists show a high level of
variety both between and within disciplines. However, where
there is variability there are also patterns, and here I will argue
that, maybe surprisingly for some, the kernel of creative science
takes us back to the mundane phenomenon of wonder and the
universal, human experience of wondering.
Phillip Wang
A simple route to argue for this position reminds us of
Socrates and his well-known argument that philosophy is born
in wonder.3 Since science finds its earliest roots in philosophi-
cal pondering, then, by extension, it is born in wonder as well.
Or we can notice that, in the accounts of scientists themselves, however, is that these are not distinct stages of a longer process
there is a clear sense that scientific discovery often takes “flight but can and do take place simultaneously. These are the unique
from wonder.”4 But there is also a deeper way to argue for the moments in which scientists are struck by the discrepancy
centrality of wondering in scientific work and this concerns the between two theories, two empirical realities or, most often,
nature of wonder itself. the gap between theory and reality, and are actively envision-
While used in daily life as largely synonymous with thinking multiple possible explanations for this disconnect. They do
ing, wondering reflects a special mode of thought and, beyond not know or understand something, and yet, the prospect of
this, a special mode of being in the world. The dictionary defi- gaining valid knowledge is unclear; what is clear is an intuition
nition of the term leads us to concepts that are already com- that something, yet unknown, will emerge.
monly associated with science such as doubt, questioning, And this is where we can make a clear distinction between
curiosity, and knowledge. But, at the same time, it includes curiosity and wonder, similar to how other scholars thought
references that are more reminiscent of the arts, for instance about them across history.7 In simple terms, curiosity is a tran-
admiration, amazement, beauty, and being in awe. In this sient state, prompted by the discovery of an unusual event,
sense, beyond its connection to philosophy, wonder is one of aimed at understanding it better, and, in doing so, at pass-
the phenomena that reveals the multiple intersections between ing from a state of not knowing to one of knowing, as fast as
art and science and can help us challenge further their separa- possible. This is why curiosity can be “satisfied” whenever we
tion.5 In fact, wonder as a phenomenon reflects well the very (think we) have the answer to our question; it can certainly be
idea of the union of opposites or of seeming opposites. For a reignited later on, but its path will always go from the unfamil-
long time, it has been acknowledged that wonder is based on iar to the familiar. Wonder tends to follow a different trajectory,
the dynamic integration of “wondering at,” or the surprise felt opposite in fact: from the familiar to the unfamiliar. This is
when experiencing the unfamiliar, and “wondering about,” because it helps us question what we believe we already know,
or the active exploration of the unfamiliar and the unknown.6 challenge the taken-for-granted, and, ultimately, rediscover
These two directions of wondering are clearly represented in reality in a completely different light. In this way, the process
scientific work that usually starts from a practical challenge, of wonder doesn’t necessarily have to end in knowledge but in
lack of knowledge, or unique question (what scientists wonder new questions.
at) and moves towards the systematic exploration of possibilities So one can immediately see how wondering would be the
associated with it (the wondering about part). What looking natural state of mind for a philosopher and maybe for an art-
at scientific creativity through the lenses of wonder shows us, ist as well—but for a scientist? Aren’t scientists driven more by
4 / EDGESCIENCE #46 • JUNE 2021
curiosity and its rather linear path from question to answer? develop science that starts from wonderous not knowing rather
There is certainly an important place for curiosity in science, than the incessant quest for absolute knowledge—and this is
including in the development of creative scientific research, no small wonder, after all!
but this doesn’t exclude the fact that some of the deepest and
most motivating explorations scientists engage in are based on VLAD GLĂVEANU, PhD, is
enduring forms of wonder rather than fleeing moments of curi- Associate Professor and Head
osity. The history of science is full of examples of scientists who of the Department of Psycholo-
had overarching, consuming types of questions that led them gy and Counselling at Webster
to problematize much of what we, collectively, think we know University Geneva, Associate
about ourselves and about the world (for a detailed analysis of Professor at the University of
such a project, see Gruber’s Darwin on Man 8). And, beyond Bergen, Director of the Web-
revolutionary scientific discoveries, the mundane practice of ster Center for Creativity and
science does oftentimes connect scientists back to the “big Innovation (WCCI) and Presi-
questions,” questions that, by definition, don’t have simple or dent of the Possibility Stud-
even single answers. ies Network (PSN). His work
And this is how a focus on wonder in scientific work can focuses on creativity, imagina-
truly transform our understanding of science and help us tion, culture, collaboration, and societal challenges. He edited
appreciate its creative nature the Palgrave Handbook of Creativity and Culture (2016) and
and its potential. The study the Oxford Creativity Reader (2018), and co-edited the Cam-
of wonder, since its early days, bridge Handbook of Creativity Across Domains (2017) and
has been about knowledge, the Oxford Handbook of Imagination and Culture (2017). He is
especially its lack. Socrates the author of The Possible: A Sociocultural Theory (2020) and
fa mously decla red t hat a l l Creativity: A Very Short Introduction (2021), with Oxford Univer-
he knows is that he doesn’t sity Press, and Wonder: The Extraordinary Power of an Ordinary
know anything, a statement Experience (2020), with Bloomsbury. Vlad received, in 2018, the
that might pass as intellec- Berlyne Award from the American Psychological Association for
tual humility but, in fact, goes outstanding early career contributions to the field of aesthetics,
much deeper than that. It cap- creativity, and the arts.
tures the workings of wonder
which invite us to uniquely
turn “not knowing” into a REFERENCES
productive, valuable state, one 1. Runco, M. A., & Jaeger, G. J. (2012). The standard definition
that shouldn’t always and rap- of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 92-96.
Phillip Wang idly be surpassed through the 2. Kaufman, J. C., Glăveanu, V. P. & Baer, J. (Eds.) (2017).
acquisition of knowledge.9 In The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity across Domains.
fact, wonder helps scientists dwell longer into the unknown, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
to use a Heideggerian phrase, stops them from quickly closing 3. Plato (1903). Theaetetus. In Platonis Opera, Edited by John
down the process of reflection and from assuming that abso- Burnet. Oxford University Press. Perseus Digital Library.
lute answers are easily within one’s grasp. The creative process 4. Rothenberg, A. (2014). Flight from wonder: An investigation
thrives, across domains, whenever we enter a mindset like the of scientific creativity. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
one described here,10 when we are able to understand the prob- 5. Dewey, J. (1934). Art as experience. New York, NY: Penguin.
lem at hand from multiple perspectives at once and place these 6. Parsons, H. L. (1969). A philosophy of wonder. Philosophy
perspectives in dialogue with each other. and Phenomenological Research, 30(1), 84–101.
Wonder opens up new spaces of possibility for the thinking 7. Heidegger, M. (1994). Basic questions of philosophy. Translated
of a scientist, and, while it might not be sustained for long peri- by R Rojcewicz & A. Schuwer. Bloomington: Indiana
ods of time, at least continuously, it is the ever-present compan- University Press.
ion of those projects that transform the world and the scien- 8. Gruber, H. E. (1981). Darwin on man: A psychological study
tist through their relationship. Teaching science, then, should of scientific creativity (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: University of
not be reduced to teaching “what is” the case but constantly Chicago Press.
inviting questions about “what could be,” “what might have 9. Gl ăveanu, V. P. (2020). Wonder: The extraordinary power of
been,” and even “what could never be.” The linear path from an ordinary experience. London: Bloomsbury Press.
hypothesis to research finding might be disrupted by what if, 10. Gl ăveanu, V. P. (2019). Creativity and wonder. Journal of
as if, and what else thinking, but it is also radically transformed Creative Behavior, 53(2), 171–177.
by it. In the end, cultivating wonder in science education is one 11. Hadzigeorgiou, Y. P. (2012). Fostering a sense of wonder in
of the safest ways to develop young minds that will continue to the science classroom. Research in Science Education, 42(5),
marvel at the world and explore it, resisting easy conclusions 985–1005.
and enduring the frustration of uncertainty.11 This way, we help
EDGESCIENCE #46 • JUNE 2021 / 5
Bruce Greyson
Claims of Past-Life Memories

in Near-Death Experiences
F or the past half century, the Division of Perceptual Studies
(DOPS) at the University of Virginia has been investigat-
ing phenomena that challenge mainstream scientific para-
Research into Claims of Past-Life Memories
Reincarnation is a central idea in many Asian religions, and a
national survey by the Pew Research Center found that a third
digms regarding the nature of the mind/brain relationship. of all Americans—even a third of Mainline Protestants and a
Researchers at DOPS have focused on studying phenomena third of Roman Catholics—believe that we may at some point
related to consciousness functioning beyond the confines of after death return to live another life here on Earth.1 But is
the physical body, and phenomena that suggest continuation there any objective evidence that we can live more than one
of consciousness after physical death, through objective docu- life? Researchers at DOPS and at other universities around
mentation and rigorous analysis of empirical data. Among the the globe have studied more than two thousand cases of very
human experiences studied at DOPS are young children’s young children—before they were of school age—who claimed
claimed memories of past lives and accounts of near-death to recall details of a past life. 2 In about half of those cases,
experiences. Both of these phenomena have been controversial they’ve been able to identify the person the child claimed to
topics in academia, as they challenge contemporary models have been in that past life. And in many cases, the child’s mem-
of the mind-brain relationship and may be open to multiple ories match specific details of the claimed past life.
interpretations. Some scholars are willing to accept one of Ian Stevenson, the psychiatrist who pioneered this research
these phenomena but not the other, but are the two linked in starting in the 1960s, limited his investigation to very young
some way? Both bear on the question of postmortem survival children, generally between the ages of 2 and 5, before they
of consciousness. Can data from the two phenomena comple- had learned to read, in order to avoid claimed past-life memo-
ment each other and form a bridge to a new understanding of ries that were likely to be contaminated by things the child may
mind and brain and of the survival question? have read or seen. He also limited his studies to memories that
came to the children spontaneously. He particularly avoided
memories recovered in hypnotic past-life regression because
of the increased suggestibility of people when they’re hypno-
tized. The purported past lives recalled under hypnosis may be
extremely plausible and convincing to the person having the
experience. But experiments have shown how easily suggestions
given by a hypnotist can influence the features of the purported
past life to conform to these suggestions.3 It’s not that infor-
mation acquired under hypnosis can’t ever be right, but rather
that it’s not reliable enough to be trusted as scientific evidence.
The young children that Ian Stevenson and other research-
ers have investigated not only have memories of a past life, but
often show behaviors, such as phobias or preferences, that are
unusual within the context of their own family and can’t be
explained by any current life events. These unexplained behav-
iors are usually consistent with the child’s statements about a
previous life. For example, a young child who remembers a life
that ended in drowning may show an unnatural fear of water,
or a young child in a Hindu family who remembers a life as a
devout Muslim may refuse to eat food not prepared according
to Islamic law. Some of these children have birthmarks and
birth defects that correspond to wounds or other marks on the
deceased person whose life the child claims to remember.4 In
many cases of this type, autopsy reports have confirmed these
Phillip Wang correspondences.
Problematic Features of Past-Life Memories

I think these cases are too strong to be written off as fantasy
and wish fulfillment, but I’m not sure that our current ideas
about reincarnation are the best explanation for them—and
neither was Ian Stevenson. All this evidence may be taken
as supporting a belief in reincarnation. There are, however,
some cases in the University of Virginia collection that sug-
gest that the matter is not straightforward. For example, in
a few cases, we have two or more children who recall the
same past life.
Anthropologist Antonia Mills described several cases
of this type among the Gitxsan tribe in British Columbia.5
Susan Albert died of a stroke in her late 70s, but before she
died, she said she wanted to come back as her granddaugh-
ter’s child. Within three months, that granddaughter gave
birth to a baby girl, Rhonda Mead. The baby was physically
and behaviorally precocious, and when she was 15 months
old, she was taken to visit relatives in a town 750 miles away.
When she saw her uncle sitting in an easy chair, she tried to
Phillip Wang
push him out of it, yelling, “That’s my chair!” and according
to her mother, “She just screamed bloody murder if anybody
sat in her chair.” She also insisted on sitting in one particular
chair at the dinner table, claiming it was hers, although she
was so small she could barely see over the edge of the table the mind-brain relationship and on the question of survival,
while sitting on it. She also identified pieces of jewelry and can the findings from near-death research contribute anything
other objects of Susan Albert’s as hers, and mentioned by to our understanding of reincarnation?
name her great-grandmother’s dog, who had died before she Near-death experiences (NDEs) are intensely vivid and
was born. Furthermore, she had an oddly shaped scar on her often life-transforming experiences, many of which occur
right arm that resembled a tattoo her great-grandmother had under extreme physiological conditions such as trauma, ceasing
on that arm, and she expressed likes and dislikes that were the of brain activity, deep general anesthesia, or cardiac arrest, in
same as Susan Albert’s. which no awareness or sensory experiences of any kind should
Around the same time of Rhonda’s birth, two other baby be possible, according to the prevailing views in neuroscience.
girls, Sheila and Susan Richards, were born to the extended Researchers at DOPS have focused particularly on NDEs that
family, both of whom also claimed to have been Susan Albert may bear on the question of whether the mind can function
in their past life. outside the physical body, and on whether we may survive
Antonia Mills has investigated other cases of multiple chil- bodily death. For example, some experiencers report seeing
dren who claim to remember the same person among several events going on at some distant location, such as another
of the Pacific Northwest tribes, and Ian Stevenson has noted room of the hospital; or an experiencer might meet a deceased
such cases among the Inuit in Alaska and among the Igbo in loved one who then communicates verifiable information the
Nigeria.6 experiencer had not known. In other NDEs, the experiencer’s
In other cases, a child will remember the past lives of two mental functioning seems to be enhanced despite physiological
people who lived at the same time. And in some cases, the evidence that the brain is impaired.
person whose life the child remembers died after the child Can the data from NDEs give us new insight into reincar-
was born. Such cases raise questions about how to interpret nation? Researchers have reported anecdotally that near-death
the children’s knowledge of someone else’s life. Because of experiencers became more open to the idea of reincarnation
these inconsistencies, Ian Stevenson, who initiated this line after their NDEs.8 Amber Wells, an undergraduate student of
of research, never claimed that these cases were proof of rein- psychologist and near-death researcher Kenneth Ring, carried
carnation. Instead, he referred to them as “cases suggestive of out a survey comparing near-death experiencers and non-expe-
reincarnation” and “cases of the reincarnation type.”7 riencers who were interested in NDEs.9 She found that belief
in reincarnation was equally strong in the experiencers and in
the comparison group of non-experiencers.
Contribution of Near-Death Research to the Study of Among more than 200 near-death experiencers who have
Claimed Past-Life Memories participated in the research at DOPS, one third said they
The typical claims of children who recall past lives are challeng- believe that after death we will be recycled and reincarnated
ing enough to our understanding of mind and brain, but these or reborn in the physical world. And another third think that
problematic cases introduce additional complications in their reincarnation is “possible.” That’s the same percent of belief in
interpretation. Given that near-death experiences also bear on reincarnation that the Pew Research Center found among the
American population as a whole. However, some near-death

experiencers relate their belief to specific events in their NDEs. “These past-life
How do young children’s descriptions of past-life memo-
ries correspond to descriptions of NDEs? Medical student memories that occur
Poonam Sharma and child psychiatrist Jim Tucker examined
cases of Asian children who claimed to remember not only
a past life, but also the period between the past life and this
during NDEs would
one.10 They found striking similarities between what these chil-
dren say about the environment between lives and what Asian
seem to support a belief
near-death experiencers say about the world of the NDE. That
would seem to support the belief that these past-life memories in reincarnation . . .”
may be real memories of another incarnation.
In addition to that corroborating evidence, there are some I was very protective towards him. This life I was now
NDEs that include apparent memories of past lives. perceiving with my brother seemed to take place in an
underdeveloped rural setting, in a time and location
I couldn’t identify. We were living in a sparsely fur-
Past-Life Memories Occurring Within nished mud hut, and I looked after him while our par-
Near-Death Experiences ents went out to work in the fields. I suddenly became
After struggling with lymphoma for four years, Anita Moorjani aware he was on the plane to come and see me, and
fell into a coma.11 Her husband rushed her to hospital, where felt, “I can’t do this to him, can’t let him come and see
her oncologist ordered a full-body scan. They found lemon- me dead.” Then I also saw how my husband’s purpose
sized tumors throughout her body, and her vital organs seemed was linked to mine, and how we decided to come and
to have shut down. Her brain and lungs were filled with fluid, experience this life together. . . .
and liquid oozed from lesions on her skin. The doctors told
her husband she would not make it through the night. But I was made to understand that, as tests had been
although she had no use of her physical senses, Anita would taken for my organ functions and the results were
later tell me that she was more acutely aware of all that was not out yet, that if I chose life, the results would
going on around her than she’d ever been in her normal physi- show that my organs were functioning normally. If
cal state: I chose death, the result would show organ failure as
the cause of death, due to cancer. I made my choice,
I was drifting in and out of consciousness during this and as I started to wake up in a very confused state,
time and could feel my spirit actually leaving my body. as I could not at that time tell which side of the veil I
I saw and heard conversations between my husband was on, the doctors came rushing into the room with
and the doctors taking place outside my room, about big smiles on their faces, saying to my family, “Good
40 feet away down a hallway. I was later able to ver- news: we got the results and her organs are function-
ify this conversation to my shocked husband. Then I ing; we can’t believe it! Her body really did seem like
actually “crossed over” to another dimension, where it had shut down!”
I was engulfed in a total feeling of love. I also expe-
rienced extreme clarity of why I had the cancer, why For Anita Moorjani, the life review in her NDE was not
I had come into this life in the first place, what role limited to this lifetime, but included images and insights from
everyone in my family played in my life in the grand a past life.
scheme of things, and generally how life works. . . .
I know I was drifting in and out between the two Veridical Past-Life Memories Occurring Within
worlds, but every time I drifted into the “other side,” Near-Death Experiences
I was shown more and more scenes. There was one The f lashes of a past life in Anita Moorjani’s life review
which showed how my life had touched all the people included no specific details that could be corroborated by
in it; it was sort of like a tapestry and showed how objective investigation. That was not the case, however, with
I affected everyone’s lives around me. There was David Moquin’s NDE, when he was hospitalized with double
another which showed my brother on a plane, hav- pneumonia at age 48. He described for me these visions as he
ing heard the news I was dying, coming to see me. was in and out of coma for several days:
This was verified to me as, when I started to come
round, my brother was there, having just got off a During that time, I experienced at least two events
plane. I then saw a glimpse of my brother and me and that felt like past lifetimes. The one that has haunted
somehow seemed to understand it was a previous life, me for the past 24 years was that of burning to death
where I was much older than he and was like a mother in an airplane crash. I kept seeing myself on fire and
to him. In this life, he is older than I. I saw in that life trying to reach a field just past a line of trees and
a barbed-wire-type fence. I crashed, hit my head, that suggest an understanding of claimed past-life memories is
and tried to crawl out as I was engulfed in fire and not straightforward.
couldn’t breathe. In an apparent contradiction to the idea of reincarnation,
many near-death experiencers report meeting deceased loved
Many years later a psychic told me that in my last life- ones in some seemingly otherworldly environment in their
time I died landing a fighter plane on an odd single NDEs. How is it possible for deceased people both to continue
digit day in November 1944. I was born December existing in some otherworldly realm after death, and also to be
21, 1944. My daughter, hearing the recording of the reborn into a new Earthly life? Is it possible that different peo-
reading, googled and found that Captain Fryer was ple have different afterlife scenarios, some being reincarnated
the only pilot that died on an odd single digit day that and others remaining in an otherworldly realm? It is possible
November, and that he died trying to land his burning that one person can have several different afterlife scenarios?
P-51 Mustang. My favorite plane has always been the If we take seriously the claim of many near-death experiencers
P-51. The model sits on my desk. My daughter asked that time as we know it doesn’t exist in the other world,12 then
me questions and I seemed to know the names of my is it possible both to continue in some otherworldly realm and
wing commander, squadron commander, mother, to be reborn on Earth?
and father. We get a hint of this kind of ambiguity in Anita Moorjani’s
account of her NDE. She told me that her experience gave her
a more nuanced understanding of reincarnation than her tra-
ditional Hindu background suggested:
Time felt different in that realm, too, and I felt all

moments at once. I was aware of everything that
pertained to me—past present, and future—simul-
taneously. I became conscious of what seemed to be
simultaneous lives playing out. As I was experiencing
the sensations associated with being a protective older
sister, ensuring that there was enough for us to eat and
we were safe from any undesirable external elements,
it didn’t feel like a past life. Even though the scene
appeared historical, in that realm, it still felt as though
it were happening here and now.
Before my NDE, probably because of my culture,

I use to think that the purpose of life was. . . . to
evolve beyond the reincarnation cycle of birth and
death . . . But after my NDE, I feel differently. This
is primarily because the concept of reincarnation in
its conventional form of a progression of lifetimes,
Phillip Wang
running sequentially one after the other, wasn’t

supported by my NDE. I realized that time doesn’t
move in a linear fashion unless we’re using the fil-
ter of our bodies and minds. Once we’re no longer
Unlike Anita Moorjani’s apparent memories of a past life, limited by our earthly senses, every moment exists
David Moquin’s included verifiable details that were subse- simultaneously. I’ve come to think that the concept
quently corroborated as true for a particular person who died of reincarnation is really just an interpretation, a way
a month before David was born. Are David Moquin’s memo- for our intellect to make sense of all existence hap-
ries from his NDE—and those of young children that seem to pening at once. . . .
be accurate accounts of the life of someone from the past—
compelling evidence that we live more than once? In the NDE state, I was aware of my brother on a
plane coming to see me and of conversations the doc-
tors were having outside my room and down the hall.
Toward a More Nuanced Understanding Purported I understood many aspects of my future life, as they
Past-Life Memories would be panning out. This showed me that time,
These past-life memories that occur during NDEs would space, and solid matter don’t always exist as we nor-
seem to support a belief in reincarnation and strengthen our mally think of them. During my NDE, I felt that I
confidence in the claims of young children to recall past lives. could focus on any point in time that I needed to
However, there are some findings from near-death research access. . . .
It’s as though our earthly minds convert what hap- ENDNOTES

pens around us into a sequence; but in actuality, when 1. Gecewicz, Claire, “‘New Age’ beliefs common among
we’re not expressing through our bodies, everything both religious and nonreligious Americans,” Pew Research
occurs simultaneously, whether past, present, or Center, October 1, 2018, w w w.pewresearch.org/fact-
future. tank/2018/10/01/new-age-beliefs-common-among-both-
religious-and-nonreligious-americans.
Although being able to perceive all points of time 2. Tucker, J. (2012). Before: Children’s Memories of Previous
simultaneously lent to the atmosphere a clarity in that Lives. New York: St. Martin’s Essentials; Stevenson, I.
realm, recalling it and writing about it creates confu- (2001). Children Who Remember Previous Lives: A Question
sion. The sequence isn’t obvious when there’s no lin- of Reincarnation (rev. ed.). Jefferson, NC: McFarland.
ear time, making the retelling sound clumsy. 3. Baker, R. A. (1982). “The effect of suggestion on past-lives
regression,” American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 25,
It seems as though our five senses limit us to focus 71–76; Spanos, N. P., Menary, E., Gabora, N. J., DuBreuil, S.
on one point in time at any given moment, and we C., & Dewhirst, B. (1991). “Secondary identity enactments
string these together to create an illusion of linear during hypnotic past-life regression: A sociocognitive perspec-
reality. . . . Because of this, I believe that when some- tive,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 308–
one has a glimpse of what have previously been inter- 320, 1991; Zolik, E. (1962). “‘Reincarnation’ phenomena
preted as “past lives,” they’re actually accessing paral- in hypnotic states,” International Journal of Parapsychology,
lel or simultaneous existences, because all time exists 4(3), 66 –78; K ampman, R , & H ir venoja, R . (1978).
at once. “Dynamic relation of the secondary personality induced by
hypnosis to the present personality.” In F. H. Frankel & H.
In this description by Anita Moorjani, as in many features S. Zamansky (Eds.), Hypnosis at Its Bicentennial. New York:
of NDEs, we’re faced with a phenomenon that near-death Plenum Press, pp. 183–188.
experiencers describe as crystal clear in their NDE, but that 4. Stevenson, I. (1997). Reincarnation and Biology: A
can’t be described adequately with words, making it difficult Contribution to the Etiology of Birthmarks and Birth Defects,
to find agreement among experiencers as to how they describe Volumes I and II. Westport, CT: Praeger.
that after-death state. So what do NDEs tell us about reincar- 5. Mills, A. (1988). “A preliminary investigation of cases of
nation? They contain tantalizing hints of an explanation, but reincarnation among the Beaver and Gitksan Indians,”
little so far that can be considered scientific evidence. At this Anthropologica, 30, 23–59.
point it appears that the question of reincarnation is a matter 6. Stevenson, I. (1969). “The belief in reincarnation and related
for which NDEs provide few definitive answers, but rather sug- cases among the Eskimos of A laska,” Proceedings of the
gest intriguing directions for further research Parapsychological Association, 6, 53–55; Stevenson, I. (1985).
“The belief in reincarnation among the Igbo of Nigeria,”
B RU CE G RE YS O N i s t h e Journal of Asian and African Studies, 20, 13–30; Stevenson,
Chester F. Carlson Profes- I. (1986). “Characteristics of cases of the reincarnation type
sor Emeritus of Psychiatry & among the Igbo of Nigeria,” Journal of Asian and African
Neurobehavioral Sciences and Studies, 21, 204–216.
Director Emeritus of the Divi- 7. Stevenson, I. (1966). Twenty Cases Suggestive of Reincarnation.
sion of Perceptual Studies at Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia Press; Stevenson, I.
the University of Virginia. He (2003). European Cases of the Reincarnation Type. Jefferson,
was one of the founders of the NC: McFarland.
International Association for 8. Ring, K. (1980). Life at Death: A Scientific Investigation of
Near-Death Studies, and for the Near-Death Experience. New York: Coward, McCann &
27 years edited the Journal Geoghegan; Sutherland, C. (1992). Transformed by the Light:
of Near-Death Studies. Grey- Life After Near-Death Experiences. New York: Bantam.
son’s research for the past four 9. Wells, A. (1993). “Reincarnation beliefs among near-death
decades has focused on near- experiencers,” Journal of Near-Death Studies, 12, 17–34.
death experiences, and their 10. Sharma, P., & Tucker, J. (2004). “Cases of the reincarnation
aftereffects and implications. type with memories from the intermission between lives.”
He is co-editor of The Near- Journal of Near-Death Studies, 23, 101–118.
Death Experience: Problems, Prospects, Perspectives (1984) 11. Moorjani, A. (2014). Dying To Be Me: My Journey from
and of The Handbook of Near-Death Experiences: Thirty Years Cancer, to Near Death, to True Healing. Carlsbad, CA: Hay
of Investigation (2009); co-author of Irreducible Mind: Toward a House.
Psychology for the 21st Century (2007); and author of After: A 12. Greyson, B. (2021). After: A Doctor Explores What Near-
Doctor Explores What Near-Death Experiences Reveal about Death Experiences Reveal about Life and Beyond. New York:
Life and Beyond (2021). St. Martin’s Essentials.
❛THE INTERVIEW❜
Gayle H Kimball
Garret Moddel on Experiments

in Psi and New Energy
Technologies
G arret Moddel was born in Dublin, Ireland, in February of
1954. His family moved to Southern California when he
was four. Garret studied electrical engineering at Stanford
University and applied physics at Harvard, and now teaches
at the University of Colorado, Boulder, in the Department
of Electrical, Computer & Energy Engineering. He was the
president of the Society for Scientific Exploration from 2007
to 2010.
What led you to study engineering at Stanford?

When I was about five years old, I went to my brother’s high
school open house. I remember going into his physics class-
room, where the instructor had a big Van de Graaff genera-
tor and he let me hold a lightbulb up to it. It glowed, which
I thought was really fascinating. Later, when we moved on to
other parts of the classroom, I went back and turned on the
generator again. I’ve just always been curious and fascinated
by how things work. When I went to college, I was interested
in a number of different majors, but ended up in Electrical
Engineering because that’s the part of engineering where
you’re really involved in the process of how something works—
if you look at semiconductor devices and technologies like that.
Mulu Moddel
That, to me, was an amalgam of basic science and applications.
I suppose that I approach life as an adventure and try to use
basic principles to invent something that works.
You have patents; you invent things. the people who have invented them and then men in black
Yes, I have patents in a number of different things. I’ve been suits take them away and destroy their invention. What is
working (originally in industry and then at the University of happening with this?
Colorado) in energy conversion devices such as solar cells, and I am going to say something that probably a lot of people won’t
other sorts of technologies that are a lot more exotic like try- like. I’ve worked quite a bit with low-energy nuclear reactions,
ing to harvest zero-point energy. Surprisingly to even me, I with Ph.D. students working on it; one who just recently earned
have a patent on that, and four more in the pipeline. Recently, her Ph.D. I worked with a local company that has probably car-
my lab has been working on an alternative technology to solar ried out the most rigorous types of low-energy nuclear cold
cells that harvests light as waves rather than as photons—it’s reaction experiments anywhere, looking at a lot of different
a different way to go. It’s still going to be a while before it’s technologies from a lot of different people and I don’t think
entirely practical. Most recently, my lab has gone back to har- that it’s been proven. I think it’s due to the misinterpretation of
vesting zero-point energy, but in an entirely new way that measurements and overall problems with the experiments. For
actually works. example, there are two main types of low-energy nuclear reac-
tions. One type—the Pons-Fleischmann experiment—consists
There’s a lot of mystique about cold fusion, now called of heavy water, a type of water that’s reactive in a nuclear way for
low-energy nuclear reactions. I’ve heard wild stories about harvesting energy, with palladium electrodes in water. Another
approach uses gas-based low-energy nuclear reaction, where deu-

terium gas is absorbed in palladium that presumably produces
excess heat, which is the low-energy nuclear reaction. There are
a lot of experiments on that, and in fact, when you infuse pal-
ladium with deuterium, it does produce excess heat. But it turns
out that that excess heat is due to a chemical reaction.
I’m interested because this could change the whole planet.

Right, it could if it worked. So, the deuterium takes the place
of hydrogen in water in these cells and that turns out to be an
exothermic reaction that produces heat. If you just look at it
casually, you would think that you just had a nuclear reaction
that produced that heat. However, if you look at it more closely, Concept for producing electricity by radiating thermal energy from
you’ll find that it is in fact a chemical reaction that produced Earth into space.
that heat and that you can reverse it. If you reverse it, instead of
exothermic, it becomes endothermic and it cools down. Olga
Dmitriyeva, my former PhD student, demonstrated this very
rigorously; it just is not a nuclear reaction. We also took a look psychic phenomenon. Before that, I just assumed that this con-
at some other types of cold fusion experiments, and in particu- cept was due to fuzzy thinking and soft minds. As I learned
lar this company that I mentioned looked at it in more detail about it, it was absolutely fascinating. I had to get into this and
than my lab did. Over and over, they looked at it and got the try to understand it. Part of that fascination is that we really
same results as my lab did and found that it was in fact due to don’t understand it but it impacts so much of our lives in so
measurement errors. It turns out that measuring heat is not an many ways.
easy thing to do; it’s very easy to fool yourself.
The key word that underlines all of the psi work is con-
If you were in charge of a global low-cost high-ecological sciousness. How would you define it?
value energy system, would it be solar? With great difficulty. It really does depend upon the discipline
Recently I got a patent for a technology to harvest radiant that you’re in as to how you would define it. I’d like to narrow
energy at night. The big problem with solar cells is that the sun it to discuss conscious interaction because it’s something that’s
doesn’t shine at night. Solar cells are very good, very efficient, pervasive and affects everything. I’ve come to that conclusion
and quite low cost. The big problem now is energy storage. If kicking and screaming. Other people were far more advanced
you could generate energy at night, as well as in the day, that in that conclusion for many years. I thought for a long time
would solve the storage problem. And now, as it turns out, that we could understand these psychic phenomena based
there is a way to do that. The sun radiates onto the earth at purely upon physical models, but I’ve come to the conclusion
about a kilowatt per square meter, which is used by solar cells. that really there is a fundamental nature of consciousness in
The earth in turn radiates heat at roughly 300 watts per square this universe and that maybe at some point we’ll be able to
meter. If you could convert that to electricity, then you’d really understand it in physics terms, but not with the models that
have a nice technology. we have now.
The problem is, to really convert heat into electricity, you
not only need a hot source, but a cold sink as well. It’s the dif- You’ve said that to understand consciousness we must
ference in temperature between the hot source and the cold include psi phenomena.
sink that ultimately determines how efficient a conversion tech- With non-locality (as when two photons are entangled, after
nology is. If the earth is the hot source, then what is the cold they’re separated and the spin of one is constrained, the other
sink going to be? Everything around us is the temperature of one instantaneously responds), it’s very tempting to say there’s
the earth, but deep space is cold. If you can absorb from the some kind of quantum information field. My understanding is
earth and radiate into deep space, then you have the technol- that you cannot say that. Yes, it’s very tempting to use quan-
ogy that could generate electricity at night. My patent describes tum physics models to explain psi phenomena but really, we
a method for doing that. It is not going to be a very efficient just don’t know. Quantum mechanics does have interactions at
technology, at least not initially, but it’s a feasible way to gen- a distance, and so does psi. Quantum does involve effects due
erate electricity at night. I would love to see something like to not just the past, but also the future and the present and so
this develop. does psi. It’s very tempting to say that one is due to the other.
If we had lived at the time of Franz Mesmer (1734 to 1815),
You were on sabbatical when you were exposed to a psi when magnetism was being developed, we’d say, “Magnetic
library that got you interested in psi. Tell us how that fields give interactions at a distance and magnetic fields are
evolved. mysterious and invisible. So maybe, it’s animal magnetism
This was around 2000. I accidentally came across a physicist’s that is the underlying physics that makes this work.” In every
library and was blown away to discover there was a science of generation, there is a fashionable new concept that we try to
“I’ve been trying to system. You can make a bigger system which is detecting what
the detector detects, so that the bigger system won’t have made
an observation until it detects the detector. You can keep on
think of a way to going, and ask, “Where does this expansion of detection stop?”
They said that it only stops at consciousness and it’s the con-
get rid of any living scious observer doing the observation that is necessary to actu-
ally collapse the wave function to a well-defined state. This is a
beings to design
minority view in physics, and there are some quantum models
that I like which don’t even need an observer at all. I’m not
sure that we actually need an observer, or an observer effect.
an experiment that Other theories that explain quantum phenomena, such as sto-
chastic electrodynamics, and other quantum mechanics inter-
involves just machines pretations, such as John Cramer’s Transactional Interpretation,

don’t require any sort of an observer. On the other hand, the
observer effect model has been applied successfully to various
to demonstrate psi.” physics and psi experiments. One of the first people to do this
was Helmut Schmidt. He did a wonderful set of experiments in
which he showed that only after something was observed, did it
go into a well-defined state. In fact, he could affect what state
apply to whatever is unknown. Right now, we’re doing that it went into even days after the process occurred by observing
with quantum mechanics and psi phenomena. Maybe there’s a the history.
connection, maybe there’s not.
Why would a businessperson care about psi research?
What’s an experiment that demonstrated to you that it There are actually a number of businesses that use psi advisors
does exist? of one sort or another. In some cases, it’s something like astrol-
Lots of them! Dean Radin had a number of experiments in ogy. In other cases, there are various sorts of remote viewing
which people looked at a screen on which an image that was (RV) and other techniques applied to making business deci-
either disturbing or calming was shown to them. They showed sions. I think this extends a lot farther, to human interactions
an emotional reaction in advance to the disturbing images as in a work environment. It extends to following our hunches.
measured by various sorts of instruments. The cleanest experi- Taking this out of the realm of urban legend and putting it
ment that I really like is one that was initially done by James onto a firm scientific foundation will allow people with various
Spottiswoode and Ed May, in which they took their poor sub- disciplines to say, “I actually have observed these effects; they
jects and put a horn against them that blasted at a random time, are useful and I will continue to work with them.”
at a time determined by an electronic random number genera-
tor (RNG). They found that the subject who was exposed to In terms of applied psi, you and your students did some
a randomly timed horn had a surge, as you might expect, in work with Associate Remote Viewing to predict the stock
their galvanic skin response. This is a very sensitive measure market. You did it with symbols, which the viewer didn’t
of the emotional state that went haywire after the horn went even know what they meant. Seven out of seven times, you
off. The fascinating part is that the response began about two got it right.
seconds prior to the horn going off. It was a very nice, clean This was taught to us by Paul Smith, who’s one of the Stargate
experiment. trained remote viewers. He used a technique that was originally
suggested by Stephan Schwartz called associative remote viewing
Another principle that applies from quantum mechanics to (ARV). Let’s say that you are tasking people to do some remote
psi is the observer effect. People are becoming more aware viewing and draw pictures of an image. When you task that in
that it’s very hard to separate the intention and belief of the your mind, you associate two images with a future event. For
experimenter even if they’re not in the room. example, a picture of an orange might be associated with the
Right, according to quantum mechanics, a particular quantum Dow Jones Industrial Average going up tomorrow while a pic-
wave function is in a superposition of all possible states. It can ture of a pencil might be associated with it going down.
collapse into one final state after it’s observed. It becomes par- You don’t say anything to the people whom you’re task-
ticle-like after it collapses. The thought experiment explaining ing, other than asking them to draw a picture of what you will
this idea is Schrödinger’s cat, in which the cat is in an indeter- show them at the end of the next day. The judges take a look at
minate state until it’s observed. There are different perspectives the images and ask if they’re more orange-like or more pencil-
on what observation means. Most physicists think that observa- like. That’s actually a fairly easy judgment to make because the
tion means simply that is registered by a detector or anything two options are so distinct. In this class, based upon whether
else. John von Neumann and Eugene Wigner had a different the majority saw it was a pencil or an orange (we actually used
view. They questioned how one can separate the detector from a variety of other images), we decided that the stock market
the experiment that it’s detecting because it’s all part of a was either going to go up or down the following day and we
invested accordingly using options trading. Then, at the end was to be shut off, it started producing more zeroes than ones.
of the day, we sold, and based upon whether the market did go We did this again and again and ended up with a few thousand
up or did go down, we showed the people the image associated samples in which the odds against chance of its being a random
with the actual outcome to close the loop. effect were millions to one.
We did this seven times, and seven times out of seven, we We were terribly excited because we finally had a way to get
got it right, and made a fair bit of money. The problem is that as rid of these sentient sacks of saltwater and were able to just use
with most psi phenomenon, there’s beginners’ luck. It works for the electronic RNGs. Then, we went about testing different bit
a while and then there’s a decline effect. Whether that decline rates and changed the scheme a little bit. It didn’t work the way
effect is psychological or something deeper, I don’t know. A that it did when we originally did it. After about two weeks, we
number of people have tried to find techniques to avoid it, with went back and replicated the original experiment with the same
very little success. You can beat the odds, you can do better than software and hardware and got no effect whatsoever. At that
50/50, but you can’t get anywhere close to 100%. point I realized that this was not the machine producing a pre-
cognitive effect—it was us, our intention. We had imbued the
You also wanted to see if you could have that kind of effect machine with our intention. It finally dawned on me: Garret,
without any human beings, by having an RNG connected stop trying to create such effect with just machines. There’s
to a computer. something about consciousness that’s a lot more profound here.
For years, I’ve been trying to think of a way to get rid of I don’t want to go to the spiritual realm, but I’m sort of being
any living beings to design an experiment that involves just nudged that way by our experiments.
machines to demonstrate psi. Finally, I thought of a way to
do it. Essentially, it would be an inanimate replica of that What about your experiment where the Zener cards were
Spottiswoode and May experiment. A controller RNG that drawn by a human remote viewer and a machine?
could shut off a subject RNG while it was spewing out ran- In a RV experiment a tasker asks an RVer to draw an image of
dom bits, which would be recorded by a computer—zeroes something that they will observe later or it’s associated with
and ones. The question was: Could the subject RNG anticipate a number or a name or something the tasker gives the viewer.
its own demise by putting out a non-random set of numbers Or just what’s inside of an envelope. A student of mine at the
before it was shut off? A graduate student in my lab, James Zhu, time, Erik Maddocks, set up an experiment that I’d been want-
worked hard on this to develop the software, and Adam Curry, ing to do for a long time. We had an envelope which contained
who at the time worked at Psyleron (the company that makes one of five Zener cards. We know the Zener cards from hav-
the Mind Lamp), built the physical apparatus for this. Finally, ing watched Ghostbusters: a wiggly line, circle, cross, square,
we set it up in my lab. James and I were so excited; we were and star. The tasker tasked the RVer to draw what was in this
tickled to finally be able to do this. We ran a few hundred runs, envelope. The viewer didn’t even know that it was Zener cards.
and low and behold, about one second before the subject RNG Unbeknownst to the RVer, in the room we also had an
RNG that was spewing out bits which were
being recorded by the computer. Then, after
the remote viewing was done, Erik had a
Judges Score program that took those bits and created a
raster scan image based upon them. Ones
Star Square Circle Wavy Lines Cross
consisted of black dots and zeroes consisted
5 3 2 4 1 of spaces. We had a series of dots creating
an image based on the output of the com-
puter, fed by this electronic R NG. Then,
the judges examined the image to deter-
mine which of the five Zener cards the RVer
had drawn. They had two different images
to judge—one was what was drawn by a
person and another one drawn by the com-
puter. It turned out that in both cases, the
RVer was able to get a statistically significant
result in getting the right image. But actu-
ally the computer-drawn images were more
accurate than what the RVer had drawn.
We call it “machine-mediated remote view-
ing,” where you get the machine to draw
These dots were produced by the raster scanned image from a the remote images. This was an initial set of
machine-mediated remote viewing session. The judges’ decided trial experiments. I would love to repeat it
that the dots represented a star. and refine this. It would be good to improve
this by having the computer do grayscale
and various sorts of image enhancement. We just did a very anything that is nonmaterial, such as consciousness, is just soft
simple grid. thinking. It’s very hard to get away from that.
In support of people who are skeptical about these experi-
What about psibotics? ments and these results—we don’t have a good model to sup-
That has a lot of implications for health and other applications. port it. There are a lot of ideas about consciousness being fun-
How does it work? The basic idea behind psibotics is to use psi, damental in a multidimensional universe with entanglement
i.e., your intention, to program a machine that has some sort of objects over large distances and times, but none of them
of a random process in it and thereby use that machine to pro- are useful at this point. We need clear and precise models that
vide a desirable function. We’ve already described two psibotic can be tested. According to Karl Popper, if a theory can’t be
machines—the one where we had two RNGs, one of which tested and falsified if incorrect then it has no value. If we had
shut off another, which was used to predict the future. That is a good model that we could verify, it would be easier for peo-
a psibotic machine because we were using our intention to get ple to jump in and say, “Yes, I accept this.” But, as it is right
the second RNG to respond to the first RNG. If we had set it now, self-respecting mainstream scientists, and psychologists
up to look at what was going to happen a few seconds hence, in particular, refuse to accept psi publicly—privately, they may.
we would have been able to predict the near-term future using Something has got to happen differently for people to shift
that machine. The other psibotic machine was when we used their view. Maybe somebody starts a company and makes a lot
an electronic RNG with remote viewing, where the machine of money using psi phenomenon—that tends to shift people’s
mediated the remote viewing by the electronic RNG through view. I’d like to see us develop models that make a lot of sense
the image rather than having a human do it. Those are two and apply those models for psi phenomena.
examples of psibotic systems.
I proposed this whole notion of psibotics because it would Do you find that you have more synchronicity and intuitive
be wonderful if we could actually use this. I’m not the first one flashes because you’re thinking about these kinds of things?
to do this; other people have used little robots controlled by Before I uncovered the literature on psi phenomena, I thought
electronic RNGs to perform various functions. The question that this was all rubbish. Since I’ve come to read about it and
is, can we do this reliably enough to provide some useful func- perform experiments, yes, I am seeing these effects around me
tion due to the two big problems with psi experiments—the fairly often. I think that once one becomes sensitive to it, it’s
decline effect and the experimenter effect. That is, things tend no longer an abstract phenomenon but an everyday real thing.
to decline in time although they may build back up. Also, it’s
very hard to know who’s controlling what, because everything What’s an example?
has an influence on the machine. What can we do, both psycho- I was taking a hike with my brother in Ireland, and in the mid-
logically and physically, to our systems to enable them to work dle of hiking up a mountain in the Burren, he said, “Garret,
in a more reliable fashion? I don’t know the answer. I’ve got a call home.” I asked him why, and he said, “I don’t know, just
few ideas, but we really need to work them out. call home.” So, I called home, and found that my department
chair and several other people had desperately been trying to
What’s interesting to me is that Dean Radin’s research, reach me, as there was a new institute being set up and they
your research, and others have effect sizes that are thou- wanted to know whether I would be the director. They had
sands of times beyond chance, yet they’re still dismissed. tried everything and didn’t know how to reach me. The wife
So, is it human nature that we oppose a new paradigm, or of the Chair had actually broken into my house to try to find
is it something about psi that makes people so reactive? some phone numbers where I could be reached. My brother has
Certainly it is human nature to not want to change our never said something like that before that, or after that. What
minds once we get a particular worldview. I taught a course was that due to? I don’t know.
called “Science Court,” in which students chose one of two
sides of an argument to debate. We used courtroom proce- Excerpt adapted with permission from The Mysteries of Reality:
dures, along with a judge, jury, cross-examination, and so Dialogues with Visionary Scientists by Gayle Kimball, published
on, to look at issues that were scientific questions of public by Iff Books, 2021.
interest.
It turned out that the science court was a failure, in the GAYLE KIMBALL, Ph.D., is the Nau-
sense that the people who were better at arguing won, rather tilus award-winning author and edi-
than the side that was more correct. I tried changing this by tor of over 20 books, a teacher and
having people change sides partway through the argument and professor most of her adult life, and
using some sort of mediation technique to get a consensus. I traveler to 25 countries. Her Ph.D. is in
found that once somebody had argued for a particular side, Religious Studies from the University
they would not let go of their original opinion. Everything else of California. Her new book, Mysteries
that they observed and saw was formed around confirmation of Reality, is part of a trilogy along with
bias. It’s really hard to get people to change their minds. We, Mysteries of Healing and Mysteries of
in the last few hundred years, are living in a materialistic era in Knowledge Beyond Our Senses. She
which we believe that everything that is, is material and that lives in Chico, California.
❛REFERENCE POINT❜
Michael Grosso
The New Story:

UFOs, Psychical Research, and Religion
time and space) popped into existence 13.8 billion years ago,
to the consternation of Einstein and others who had assumed
a steady-state universe, not one apparently exploding out of
nothing and looking suspiciously like some kind of creation.
(No surprise that Pope Pius XII hailed the new scientific dis-
covery with glee.)
So the new story is flanked by mysteries. But there are
also progressive elements and new meanings to engage with,
not just puzzlement and gasps of wonder. At least two novel
features mark the new story that wants to be told: one, a
decided leap upward in mental and physical capacity; and two,
an enlarged perception of a real but unknown intelligence that
seems to originate from outside our physical world. Its opera-
tions are not just visible in space but sometimes reportedly they
interact with us.
Our Superpowers
Grant Morrison, author of Supergods, writes: “In a secular, sci-
Phillip Wang
entific, rational culture lacking in any convincing spiritual lead-

ership, superhero stories speak loudly and boldly to our greatest
fears, deepest longings, and highest aspirations.” Superman,
the 1938 comic creation of Jerry Siegel and Joseph Shuster, is
We hear it from many nowadays: the need for a “new a superhero and Christlike savior of everyday people, “who”
story.” The need, it seems, is for a more inclusive picture of promptly became famous around the world—a really good guy
what there is and what it means to be a human being. The with super powers. Superman and all the superheroes that fol-
newness of the new story takes full account of the importance lowed, from Batman to Wonder Woman, have for decades been
and the varieties of extraordinary human experience. It is a sheer magic for audiences, but most of all, for those in the busi-
worldview, a paradigm renewed, driven by an expanded idea of ness of making super money. (But not for Siegel and Shuster
mind and consciousness. who sold the rights of their Superman creation for $130 and
Here are some of the motifs that seem to have a place in died in relative obscurity.)
the new story. (This is, I confess, a mere sketch.) The stress is Morrison’s book is brilliantly written but in the end I am
on phenomena that challenge the old story: accounts of UFO left with a wistful curiosity about superpowers. The issue of real
phenomena; of paranormal, mystical, and visionary experiences; superpowers is never quite raised; there is no entry in the index
and of new conceptions and facts from quantum mechanics, for “superpower.” This is a recurrent problem I keep noticing,
animal psychology, and cosmology. In the new story, as it may an eagerness to flirt with the fantastic without the spirit to con-
be seen, the chief character (and seeming upstart) is mind-and- front the real McCoy.
consciousness; and this, in opposition to the old story, whose Another example is Serinity Young’s thoughtful study:
chief agent and narrative star is mindless, measurable matter. Women Who Fly: Goddesses, Witches, Mystics, and Other
A second point about the new story: it’s shrouded in mys- Airborne Females. The book is about power and sexual-
tery. This induces in us a certain mood of humility. To focus ity but never seriously broaches the issue of actual levita-
on mind and consciousness is to focus on mystery, the most tion. St. Teresa, whom she deploys, was a fairly frequent flier
obvious and most universal mystery. But now, in honor of our (though a tyro compared to the irrepressible mystic, Joseph
ignorance, we may ask: Why is there something rather than of Copertino). In the new story, we want to know if any of
nothing? What science tells us is that the universe (along with these women did in fact fly.
Kenneth Woodward’s The Book of Miracles is an account but it also becomes agitprop for teleology—specifically, for the
of the “meaning” of miracle stories in the great religions. completion of human evolution. Needless to say, we’re a long
But Woodward states he’s not going to address the reality way from the Omega Point.
status of miracles. The entire question is safely tucked away The similarity between NDEs and UFO contact is under-
in parentheses. I open at random to a page titled “Jesus Stills stood. In both, the individual’s consciousness is torn from
a Storm” where a passage is cited (Mark 4:35-41) describing absorption in everyday life. But the wound is also an opening,
Jesus in a boat with his disciples about to be “swamped” by allowing the influx from the subliminal treasure-trove. Ring
a sudden windstorm. Jesus says to the sea: “Peace! Be still!” offers a precious hint as to why some folk are more receptive to
“Then the wind ceased, and there was a dead calm.” We are those high-powered near-death inspirations and UFO encoun-
told by Woodward that the sea is a symbol of chaos and that ters that transform lives. Being wounded, shocked, riven, may,
the message of this miracle story is “that Jesus does what only in the end, enable access to more exotic spiritual influences.
God can do.” My reaction is a bored shrug. I would like to The point seems to be: be glad when life dumps on you; it may
know if Jesus did in fact paranormally influence the weather; be a setup for great times ahead.
in fact, there are credible reports of weather control in mod- At the heart of this new story is the idea of Mind at Large
ern times by, for example, Black Elk, Padre Pio, and Sai Baba. (phrase borrowed from A. Huxley)—the notion that our seem-
If Jesus did not perform all the paranormal deeds the Gospels ingly individual and isolated minds are in fact grounded in a
allege he performed, I doubt he would have attracted the fol- greater, deeper one mind. Individuals and traditions keep dis-
lowers he did. The question of the possibility of real miracles covering and rediscovering the great mind, naming, engag-
should at least be open for discussion, especially in light of ing and disengaging from it. The present world, bewitched by
the existing literature. When it comes to persuasive power, science and technology, seems at a low point of living contact
a miracle is always more effective than a moral precept. The with the Mind at Large. The new story is full of rebirth pangs,
sight of some portion of reality transmogrified is a powerfully the sounds of breaking up and breaking through, the strange
convincing argument music of the paradox that near death is near life’s renewal.
Accounts of extraordinary phenomena in ancient docu-
ments, in modern comics and entertainment venues—images
of super-humanity—charm the imagination. But the empiri- An Unknown Intelligence
cal reality of real super-ordinary phenomena have been mar- R ing’s effort to bring NDEs and UFOs into comparative
ginalized and pushed into the shadows. The new story will be study bore fruit belatedly with the publication in 2018 of a
formed out of information that has been ignored, distorted, massive, 800-page tome titled Beyond UFOs: The Science of
and largely crushed out of contemporary culture. Consciousness and Contact with Non-Human Intelligence, a
The drift of it is to move beyond physicalist reductionism product of the Edgar Mitchell Foundation for Research into
toward a form of creative idealism. So we are on the lookout Extraterrestrial and Extraordinary Experience (FREE), edited
for reports of the higher powers of the mind. One step in this by Rey Hernandez, experiencer and lawyer by profession; Jon
direction is to combine into one discipline the explorations of
ufology and psychical research. The ur document for this is a
book by the psychologist Kenneth Ring, The Omega Project:
Near-Death Experiences, UFO Encounters, and Mind at Large.
Before I describe the content of R ing’s book, I want
to mention another of his contributions, also “new story”
worthy—Mindsight: Near-Death and Out-of-Body Experiences
in the Blind, a book studying cases of congenitally blind people
who had near-death experiences. These were people who never
saw the light of day before, but during their near-death epiph-
any beheld the light and color of the world for the first time in
their lives. Something to wonder at! And so theoretically pro-
vocative. Another motif to be woven into the new story.
In The Omega Project, Ring reveals that people who had
near-death encounters and people who had unidentified aer-
ial encounters shared an “encounter prone personality,” the
result of childhood traumas that made them prone to creative
dissociation. There were other close similarities; for example,
psychophysical changes after the encounter and, above all, pro-
found changes of beliefs and values. The drift of these shared
phenomenologies suggested to Ring the presence of a goal-
oriented evolutionary process that Teilhard de Chardin called
Phillip Wang
the Omega Point. That is a rather startling idea. The new story
is not just about a growing awareness of the universal mind
“The revelation, now Soon after receiving Beyond UFOs I received a phone
call from the book’s editor, Rey Hernandez. It turned out to
finally coming to be a highly animated exchange. Rey is a lawyer, then living
in Florida, and he told me that before his first experience he
light after decades had zero interest in anything to do with UFOs or the para-
normal. That experience altered his sense of reality. In short,
one day a totally unknown light-energy entity entered Rey’s
of torturous secrecy, home through locked doors and caused his wife and gravely
ill dog to vanish before his eyes. When they returned after a
is that we are in short time, the dying dog was healed and lived on for several
years. There is a veterinarian’s testimony documenting the
dog’s illness and sudden healing. His wife believed the entity
contact with unearthly was an angel. Needless to say, the experience blew Rey’s law-
yer-logical mind. He felt driven to study such extraordinary
intelligence and super- phenomena, and formed a friendship with Dr. Edgar Mitchell,
the Apollo 14 astronaut who had similar interests. His focus
was on the various altered modalities of consciousness that
technical power. But make us privy to the wider universe of human potential. His
research produced Beyond UFOs, to be followed shortly by
what, who, and why new volumes on theory and experience that cover the whole
spectrum of extraordinary experiences being reported today.
I can’t imagine a closer kind of encounter with an otherworld
nobody knows.” event than to witness your wife and your dying dog vanish
before your eyes—and when they return, the dog is healed.
By my definition, that’s a bona fide miracle.
The new story features agents of intelligence with strange
Klimo, consciousness scholar; and Rudy Schild, astrophysi- powers to penetrate matter (enter your house), make people
cist. What is extraordinary about this book is the abundance disappear, and perform miraculous healing, unless we wish to
of reports from all walks of life of all manner of strange life- believe that a sane, down-to-earth lawyer went crazy and paid
changing encounters with agents of unknown origins. And all his vet to lie and pretend his dog was healed. The truth is that
this proliferation of strangeness had been piling up in the first Rey Hernandez’s story is one among countless inexplicable
two decades of the fateful 21st century. Meandering among reports of high strangeness.
the metaphysical wilds of this book, I had to fight off waves of Encounters with strange aerial phenomena have been
ontological vertigo. known to vast numbers of people (including myself ), for
The reports form a bridge between ufology and psychical many decades, if not all history; the truth is finally coming
research. The massive collection includes accounts of near-death out directly from government agencies. An article in The New
experiences (NDEs) alien visitations, galactic tours, angels, great York Times appeared on December 17, 2017, that confirmed
dreams, visions, meeting dead relatives on spaceships, out-of- that the Pentagon had secretly been studying UFOs: “A
body states, abductions, and mystical raptures. These are all 2009 Pentagon briefing summary of the program [Advance
viewed as using alternate modalities of perception, all avenues Aerospace Threat Identification Program] prepared by its
to extraordinary modes of consciousness and being. The NDE director at the time asserted that ‘what was considered sci-
often awakens and signals the acquisition of healing and other ence fiction is now science fact.’” Articles on the subject have
extended mental powers. The new story and the new science will appeared in the New Yorker and other mainstream publica-
surely double down on research into our extraordinary healing tions, and on the CBS newsmagazine 60 Minutes, where Luis
potential, beginning with studies of the placebo effect and the Elizondo, the former director of the secret Pentagon pro-
healing miracles of saints, mystics, yogis, and shamans. gram, stated: “Imagine a technology that can do 6-to-700
In many cases, people having near-death experiences g-forces, that can fly at 13,000 miles an hour, that can evade
become receptive to extraterrestrial and ultradimensional con- radar and that can fly through air and water and possibly
tact; a connection we might predict in light of Ring’s com- space. And oh, by the way, has no obvious signs of propul-
parative study. The FREE researchers are focused on delving sion, no wings, no control surfaces and yet still can defy the
into the mysteries of consciousness and bringing in experienc- natural effects of Earth’s gravity. That’s precisely what we’re
ers of all types, academics, scientists, and folks without much seeing.” The emotional tonality of the 60 Minutes segment
formal education. All this seems to be a sign of the widespread was more anxious than amazed; more paranoid about pos-
pouring out of strange experiences that upset our assumptions sible danger than thrilled by a great scientific challenge. And
about ordinary reality. People everywhere are having experi- perhaps most shocking, the officials gave a clear impression
ences whose main effect is to break open the ontological boxes that the Unidentified Aerial Phenomena were showing up
they’re normally locked down in. everywhere and every day.
Another book just published, Making Contact, edited unknown force and intelligence is present and active in our
by Alan Steinfeld, speaks with force to the need for a new world: “I must admit to being a bit perverse for, as a psy-
story. The subtitle is timely: Preparing for the New Realities chiatrist, I believe that anything that can be a big blow to
of Extraterrestrial Existence. This is a book on UFOs, as was the human ego can only be a good thing in terms of our
Beyond UFOs, at a time when we know we are at last talking collective development. Such shocks can perhaps help us to
about a reality that seems quite beyond us as to what, why, and grow as a species.” Grant Cameron’s chapter, titled “The
how any of it is happening. Alan Steinfeld’s introduction would Theory of WOW,” hits the same theme, explaining that all
awaken us to something truly epochal. Finally, the U. S. gov- the strange encounters, so varied and unpredictable, have
ernment (since around 2017) seems to admit of the reality of an one overall purpose, to wake us up, to prepare us, to dilate
unknown, supertechnical intelligence in our midst. The book’s our personalities.
roster of authors, including Whitley Strieber and John Mack, Steinfeld shows how the mainstream and government are
are all seasoned explorers of a zone of being whose reality sta- opening up to a truth known by millions: the reality of uniden-
tus is being affirmed by public officials, a reality whose nature tified intelligences on our planet. The perspectives on the phe-
and origin, whether deep within or beyond us, remains unclear. nomenon are understood to be multiple. Two big assertions
The revelation, now finally coming to light after decades may be gleaned from this book; the reports of the unidenti-
of torturous secrecy, is that we are in contact with unearthly fied and the physically inexplicable intrusion into our space are
intelligence and super-technical power. But what, who, and true. But who they are, where they are from, and why they are
why nobody knows. Each essay in the book contributes to mak- here is unknown. We are faced with a very unusual challenge:
ing this momentous claim about the presence of alien other- forming a relationship to the unknown that will be, we of
ness and higher forms of power in our world. George Noory, course hope, to our advantage. With official affirmation from
host of Coast to Coast AM, begins with a statement about his the U.S. government, we have entered a new epoch of human
years of listening to UFO stories, and Alan Steinfeld’s excellent history. A highly advanced but thoroughly obscure and evasive
introduction provides a detailed account of the latest disclo- intelligence is in our midst, and we are being told by Steinfeld
sures from the U.S. government as when The New York Times and company in Making Contact, it is something we had bet-
reported that the astrophysics consultant to the Pentagon’s ter prepare for.
AATIP program, Eric W. Davis, gave a series of classified brief-
ings to members of the Senate Armed Services Committee, the
Intelligence Committees, and the Defense Department about Psi Phenomena
“crashed retrievals of unexplained off-world vehicles not made The new story, as I see it emerging, would incorporate the data
on this earth.” of psychical research. There are many ways this might be done,
I can’t resist at this point quoting John Mack, the theoretically and practically. I’ll mention three categories of
late Harvard psychiatrist who was nearly crucified for con- psi phenomena and try to imagine how they would transform
cluding, after years of investigating experiencers, that an our mode of being in the world. Call it an exercise in active
imagination.
Consider, for example, telepathy. Frederic W. H. Myers,
the British poet, classicist, philologist, and a founder of the
Society for Psychical Research, linked telepathy to the power of
love, and to what we call empathy, the ability to enter into the
subjectivity of the other—and not just humans. Imagine for a
moment the human species newly endowed with a more robust
and reliable faculty of telepathy and empathy. That additional
factor alone would, in my opinion, be a major step toward the
revival of nature and the joys of civilization. In any concept of a
new higher education, this would figure as a major concern, the
higher education of social intelligence. What we’re imagining is
a time when paranormal telepathy evolves into normal empathy.
Now consider a comparable increase of another extraor-
dinary human potential: psychokinesis, PK, (aka telekinesis).
The data demonstrates various ways that our mental powers
can be physically expressed. One set of capacities would gravely
impact the transportation industries, supposing at one point we
learn to levitate, bilocate, and teleport ourselves around. In a
more radical vein, imagine the impact on the health industries
if our amazing healing potentials were fully awakened, acti-
vated, and diffused through the whole population. In a more
Phillip Wang
evolved society, every individual would be the chief custodian

of her/his own health.
One more example will serve to illustrate. Again, we fabric of everyday life. For purely empirical reasons, I believe
have the data to justify this futuristic meditation. How the extraordinary is possible; the seed of creative evolution is
would human beings react to the discovery that, quite apart alive in us all. I can imagine this leap of spirit happening in
from religion, science has made the case for the reality of two ways: one by means of a new higher education, designed
postmortem consciousness? In other words, when our bod- to liberate our extraordinary potentials. The other, more grim
ies die, our inner, subjective, interior selves, not made of possibility is that it happens spontaneously, as we descend into
material cloth to begin with, survives, continues, according a long global near-death experience, which in the end sparks
to reports, even flourishes as never before. This, were it a the greatest renaissance of all history.
truth laid bare for all to see, would make a dramatic differ-
ence living the new story. MICHAEL GROSSO studied
classics and received his Ph.D.
in philosophy from Columbia
The New Human Species University. He has taught phi-
All the changes that would arise from evolving the powers we losophy and the humanities
already possess we could describe as our potential evolution- at New Jersey City University,
ary future, realizing the gifts we have in germ to grow to full CUNY (City University of New
completion. This then we might describe as a model of a new York), and Kennedy University,
human species. CA. His recent books include
Many UFO contactees and abductees have messages about Smile of the Universe: Miracles
the need to get on with human evolution. The higher beings, in an Age of Disbelief; The Man
we’re told, are here to speed up the process. They are concerned Who Could Fly: St. Joseph of
Frank Pasciuti
about our future, especially after we began exploding atomic Copertino and the Mystery of
bombs (see Robert Hastings, UFOs and Nukes). So this is part Levitation; The Final Choice:
of the needed new story: an agent, in whatever way possible, Death or Transcendence?; Ex-
to move us toward collective transformation. We need to avoid periencing the Next World Now.
nuclear suicide and climate apocalypse. And the message seems Grosso’s focus is on the science of extraordinary human
to be: evolve or die! So the question becomes: How do we free experience and the creative implications of altered states of
up our latent psychospiritual potentials? consciousness. See his blog: consciousnessunbound.blogspot.
Recall that Alfred Russel Wallace co-discovered the basic com. He is also a painter who works at the interface of art and
principles of modern evolution with Charles Darwin. But in the paranormal. See his art site: paintingthepsyche.com.
contrast to Darwin, Wallace studied and experimented with
mediumship and was converted to a spiritualist philosophy of
consciousness, entirely due to his own empirical observations. REFERENCES
(He tried to get Darwin interested, but failed.) He gives an Becker, Ernest. The Denial of Death, Souvenir Press, 2011.
account of his research, reasoning, and devastating criticisms Hastings, Robert. UFOs and Nukes: Extraordinary Encounters at
of the irrational incredulity of fellow scientists who refuse to Nuclear Weapons Sites, AuthorHouse, 2008.
face facts that contradict their most beloved beliefs. Wallace is Hernandez, Rey, (ed). Beyond UFOs: The Science of Consciousness
emphatic about facts, and describes how he once couldn’t bear and Contact with Non-Human Intelligence, F.R.E.E., 2018.
the term “spirits” but that “facts” forced him to embrace the Morrison, Grant. Supergods: What Masked Vigilantes, Miraculous
term (which in Greek just means wind). His book, Miracles Mutants, and a Sun God from Smallville Can Teach Us About
and Modern Spiritualism (1878), lays out evidence and argu- Being Human, Random House, 2012.
ments for his case with the verve and clarity of a master scien- Steinfeld, Alan, (ed). Making Contact: Preparing for the New
tist. This leads to my concluding comment on what the new Realities of Extraterrestrial Existence, St. Martin’s Essentials,
story will feature: It will be informed by a powerful blend of 2021.
science, religion, and art. R i ng, Ken net h. Mindsight: Near-Death and Out-of-Body
One can imagine how paranormal evolution of the per- Experiences in the Blind, iUniverse, 2008.
sonality could bring about improvements in our general mode Ring, Kenneth. The Omega Project: Near-Death Experiences, UFO
of being on Earth. Suppose, for example, our telepathic sen- Encounters, and Mind at Large, Morrow, 1992.
sibilities were enhanced, which would entail an expansion Woodward, Kenneth. The Book of Miracles: The Meaning of the
of empathic capacity; surely, a change with much practical Miracle Stories in Christianity, Judaism, Buddhism, Hinduism
potential. (Given the paucity of the stuff in a world of raging and Islam, Simon & Schuster, 2001.
hatreds.) It would improve human relations, as well as our rela- Young, Serinity. Women Who Fly: Goddesses, Witches, Mystics, and
tions with other sentient beings, and with the living earth we Other Airborne Females, Oxford University Press, 2018.
are all nestled in. Empathy for the Earth! An essential item of
the New Story.
Finally, we can imagine that our mystical sense begins
to unfold and we know joy, love, and freedom as part of the
Noteworthy Books
After: A Doctor Explores What Near-Death Wonder: The Extraordinary Power of an

Experiences Reveal about Life and Beyond Ordinary Experience
by Bruce Greyson by Vlad Glaveanu
ST. MARTIN’S ESSENTIALS, 2021 BLOOMSBURY ACADEMIC, 2020
Smile of the Universe: The Mysteries of Reality:

Miracles in an Age of Disbelief Dialogues with Visionary Scientists
by Michael Grosso by Gayle Kimball
ANOMALIST BOOKS, 2020 IFF BOOKS, 2021

Edgescience 46

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Edgescience 46

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Edgescience 46

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Edge Science

Number 46 June 2021

Current Research and Insights

PUBLISHER: The Society for Scientific Exploration

Copyright © 2021 Society for Scientific Exploration

Claims of Past-Life Memories

Problematic Features of Past-Life Memories

American population as a whole. However, some near-death

Time felt different in that realm, too, and I felt all

Before my NDE, probably because of my culture,

running sequentially one after the other, wasn’t

It’s as though our earthly minds convert what hap- ENDNOTES

Garret Moddel on Experiments

What led you to study engineering at Stanford?

approach uses gas-based low-energy nuclear reaction, where deu-

I’m interested because this could change the whole planet.

involves just machines pretations, such as John Cramer’s Transactional Interpretation,

The New Story:

entific, rational culture lacking in any convincing spiritual lead-

evolved society, every individual would be the chief custodian

After: A Doctor Explores What Near-Death Wonder: The Extraordinary Power of an

Smile of the Universe: The Mysteries of Reality:

You might also like