Catatan Occlusal Adjustment
Catatan Occlusal Adjustment
Catatan Occlusal Adjustment
Chronic periodontitis is the most common form of periodontitis13; Box 5.3 includes the characteristics of this form of
periodontitis. Chronic periodontitis is most prevalent in adults, but it can also be observed in children. Different classiication
schemes have confirmed or discarded the age range of more than 35 years to separate chronic versus aggressive
periodontitis. According to the existing deinition, persons younger than 35 years may exhibit a rate of progression of disease
consistent with the deinition of chronic periodontitis. Nonetheless, epidemiologic evidence supports the suggestion that
persons younger than 25 years at disease onset are likely to exhibit aggressive periodontitis. Intraoral radiographs along with
periodontal charting records are of paramount importance to the documentation of disease onset and rate of progression.
Chronic periodontitis is associated with the accumulation of plaque and calculus. It generally has a slow to moderate rate of
disease progression, but periods of more rapid destruction may also be observed. Increases in the rate of disease progression
may be caused by the impact of local, systemic, or environmental factors that may inluence the normal host–bacteria
interaction. Local factors may inluence plaque accumulation (Box 5.4), whereas systemic diseases (e.g., diabetes mellitus,
HIV) may inluence the host’s defenses, and environmental factors (e.g., cigarette smoking, stress) may influence the
response of the host to plaque accumulation. Chronic periodontitis may occur as a localized disease in which less than 30%
of evaluated teeth demonstrate attachment and bone loss, or it may occur as generalized when more than 30% of teeth are
affected.
Chronic periodontitis can be further classiied on the basis of its extent and severity. The severity of disease has
been traditionally determined as either slight/mild (1 to 2 mm of loss; Fig. 5.15), moderate (3 to 4 mm of loss; Fig. 5.16), or
severe (_5 mm of loss; Fig. 5.17) on the basis of the amount of clinical attachment loss (see Box 5.3). Clinical attachment
levels provide important beneits over probing depth alone to monitor disease progression using the CEJ as a ixed reference
point. In fact, probing depth levels only have poor to moderate sensitivity for predicting attachment level changes overtime.
Nonetheless, clinical experience has revealed that oftentimes measurement of clinical attachment levels in practice may
prove to be erroneous. The most common error occurs in the case of sites without gingival recession, whereby the location of
the gingival margin is coronal to the CEJ. If the clinician in such a case only records the probing depth without charting the
location of the CEJ (often charted as “positive recession” in electronic periodontal charts), the resulting attachment levels
will be erroneously recorded as being equal to the probing depth. To prevent such an overestimate of disease, it has been
suggested that clinicians consider that mild periodontitis be associated with probing depths of <4 mm, moderate periodontitis
with probing depths of 5 to 6 mm, and severe periodontitis with probing depths of _7 mm. However, probing depths alone
should not be used to classify periodontitis without simultaneous consideration of clinical attachment levels and radiographic
bone loss.
Furcation involvements have been classiied as grades I through IV according to the amount of tissue destruction. Grade I
involves incipient bone loss; grade II involves partial bone loss (cul-de-sac); and grade III involves total bone loss with a
through-and-through opening of the furcation, but the opening of the furcation is not visible due to the gingiva, which covers
the oriice. Grade IV is to grade III but includes gingival recession that exposes the furcation to view. (See Chapter 64 for
further discussion on furcation classiication.)
Primary trauma from occlusion occurs if trauma from occlusion is considered the primary etiologic factor in periodontal
destruction and if the only local alteration to which a tooth is subjected is a result of occlusion.
Secondary trauma from occlusion occurs when the adaptive capacity of the tissues to withstand occlusal forces is impaired
by bone loss that results from marginal inflammation. This reduces the periodontal attachment area and alters the leverage on
the remaining tissues. The periodontium becomes more vulnerable to injury, and previously well-tolerated occlusal forces
become traumatic.
Currently, the severity of chronic periodontitis is characterized on a three-tier system based on clinical attachment loss
(CAL): slight = 1 or 2 mm CAL, moderate = 3 or 4 mm CAL, and severe ≥5 mm CAL.
In contrast to schemes based on tooth mortality, Kwok and Caton25 proposed a scheme based on “the probability of obtaining
stability of the periodontal supporting apparatus.” This scheme is based on the probability of disease progression as related
to local and systemic factors (see Box 35.1). Although some of these factors may affect disease progression more than
others, consideration of each factor is important in assigning a prognosis. This scheme is as follows:
Favorable prognosis: Comprehensive periodontal treatment and maintenance will stabilize the status of the tooth. Future
loss of periodontal support is unlikely.
Questionable prognosis: Local or systemic factors inluencing the periodontal status of the tooth may or may not be
controllable. If controlled, the periodontal status can be stabilized with comprehensive periodontal treatment. If not, future
periodontal breakdown may occur.
Unfavorable prognosis: Local or systemic factors inluencing the periodontal status cannot be controlled. Comprehensive
periodont al treatment and maintenance are unlikely to prevent future periodontal breakdown.
Hopeless prognosis: The tooth must be extracted. Because periodontal stability is assessed on a regular basis using clinical
measures, it may be more useful in making treatment decisions and prognosis predictions than in trying to determine the
likelihood that the tooth will be lost.
Occlusal Adjustment
As teeth tighten from consistent use of the appliance, occlusal interferences may become more evident, and greater
discrepancy between the initial dental contact and maximal intercuspation may be observed. Interferences with harmonious
excursive movement of the mandible may also become more obvious. When the clinician conirms that the interferences
correlate with a greater than expecte loss of attachment, direct intervention in the patient’s occlusion is considered. With the
patient’s full understanding and consent, occlusal adjustment or selective reshaping of the occluding surfaces of the teeth can
reduce the magnitude of occlusal interferences or direct the forces to be more compatible with the long axes of the affected
teeth.
Clinical analysis of the occlusion should be combined with a detailed analysis of diagnostic casts mounted in
centric relation on an adjustable articulator. Accurately mounted duplicate models can be used to accomplish a trial occlusal
adjustment to determine safety and eficacy for a patient. 10,28 Scheduling patients so that they leave their appliances on
overnight and in place until they are seated in the dental chair allows assessment of their teeth at maximal irmnes s, when
interferences are most readily identiiable. Teeth usually progressively tighten with continued compliance with the appliance
and repeated careful occlusal adjustment. Other methods that can be employed to alter occlusal relationships include
orthodontics and restorative dentistry. Provisional restoration of teeth is another method of improving occlusal contacts and
stability, and it often simpliies the process of occlusal adjustment and inal restoration.