Article
Article
Article
case, that we think the spheriiles in the latter case may certainly be
regarded as a form of Russell’s fuchsine bodies. We say advisedly
‘‘ a form of,” because it is possible that Russell’s “ fuchsine bodies ” are
not all exactly identical with each other.
It follows from all this that the spherules found in Weber’s
multiple myeloma case, to which we have already alluded, though
present in extraordinary abundance both in clumps within the cells
(sometimes in the form of mulberry cells) and scattered free in the
tissues, must likewise be regarded as probably forms of Russell’s
fuchsine bodies, in spite of the fact that they were never tested by
Russell’s fuchsine and iodine-green method of staining.
The importance of this conclusion lies partly, we believe, in the
fact that, since fuchsine bodies are now regarded by almost all
observers merely as products of cell degeneration,’ they are not likely
to possess any special pathological diagnostic significance in regard to
multiple myeloma, and it is unlikely that they are more closely con-
nected with multiple myeloma (and Bence-Jones’ albumosuria) than
with other conditions in which they have been found present. This
is confirmed by the fact that their presence has not been recorded in
most other published cases of multiple myeloma.