Triune God 1
Triune God 1
Triune God 1
C oncerning the knowledge of the Triune God revealed that if we would know the true God both in outward, ob-
in the Word of God, the New Testament contains a jective knowledge and according to the inward, subjective
prayer, a promise, a provision, and a proclamation. The consciousness of the divine life within us as genuine chil-
prayer is recorded in Ephesians 1:17, where Paul invokes dren of God begotten of Him, we must fulfill certain
“the God of our Lord Jesus Christ, the Father of glory” to requirements, or prerequisites. Actually, these prerequi-
give us “a spirit of wisdom and revelation in the full knowl- sites are the ways in which we come to know the Triune
edge of Him.” Paul expressed a similar desire in Colossians God. In a two-part article we will endeavor to present the
1:9-10, where he prayed that we would “be filled with the crucial requirements for knowing the full truth regarding
full knowledge of His will in the Triune God unveiled and
all spiritual wisdom and un- unfolded in the Word of
derstanding” and grow “by the God. These numerous re-
full knowledge of God.” The If we would know quirements, which can be
promise is given in Hebrews covered here only in an in-
8:11: “They shall by no means the Triune God, troductory and elementary
each teach his fellow citizen way, fall into three basic cate-
and each his brother, saying, we need to rely not gories: the Bible, the Triune
Know the Lord; for all will God, and our person. Know-
know Me from the little one to on traditional terms, ing God therefore entails a
the great one among them.” dynamic triangular interac-
The provision is mentioned in teachings, and expressions tion among the Word of
John 17:3: “This is eternal life, God, the Triune God, and
that they may know You, the but on the pure the person of those who ear-
only true God, and Him nestly seek the truth of God
whom You have sent, Jesus word of the Bible. and the God of truth. In ad-
Christ.” The proclamation is dition, we will see that this
made in 1 John 5:20: “We triangular interaction takes
know that the Son of God has come and has given us an place in a very particular context—the reality of the Body
understanding that we might know Him who is true; and of Christ.
we are in Him who is true, in His Son Jesus Christ. This is
the true God and eternal life.” With these and other verses The Pure Word and the Complete Truth
as the basis, we may be assured that, as believers in Christ,
we can know the true and living Triune God—the Father, God has spoken, and the Triune God’s speaking has be-
the Son, and the Spirit. come His written word—the Holy Scriptures. Apart from
God’s word, His speaking, we cannot know God, for His
The Bible further shows us, in various and sundry ways, word is His expression, definition, and explanation. We
If we would know the Triune God revealed in the Word leaven of human opinion, concept, and tradition, or, at
of God, we need to rely not on traditional terms, teach- least, distinguish between it and the divine revelation em-
ings, and expressions but on the pure word of the Bible. bodied in and conveyed through the Bible.
We must honor the Word of God in its intrinsic purity,
not mixing it with human opinion or speculation. This As we consider the revelation of the Triune God in the Bi-
means that our stand with respect to the Trinity should ble, we wish to uphold the purity of God’s word and not
be the Holy Scriptures, not according to traditional inter- blindly adhere to traditional terms, concepts, systems, and
pretations but according to the pure word of God. “Every theological formulations. Although, due to the poverty of
word of God is pure… Add thou not unto his words, lest our language, we need to use certain terms, we must be on
he reprove thee, and thou be found a liar” (Prov. 30:5a, 6, guard not to equate them with, much less allow them to
KJV). Adding to God’s word is most serious and is replace, the word of the Bible. We would do well to heed
strictly proscribed in Deuteronomy 4:2 and 12:32 and in the words of E. W. Bullinger: “If we confine ourselves to
Revelation 22:18. the Word of God, and that alone, both the writer and
reader may, and will, all learn together what God has re-
What does it mean, in a practical way, to add to the vealed concerning Himself ” (Selected Writings, p. 45).
Word of God? The Lord Jesus provides a clear answer
when He says to His disciples: “Watch and beware of the In order to know the truth concerning the Triune God in
leaven of the Pharisees and Sadducees” (Matt. 16:6). a full, complete, and balanced way and to maintain a tes-
Leaven is something added to dough to produce fermen- timony faithful to the whole truth of God’s revelation in
tation (cf. Matt. 13:33). Since the disciples were unable the Scriptures, we need to see the principle of the
to understand His word, the Lord Jesus went on to ask twofoldness of divine truth. As a help in understanding
them: “How is it that you do not understand that it was this principle, let us quote several portions from The
not about bread that I spoke to you? But beware of the Twofoldness of Divine Truth, a booklet by Robert Govett, a
leaven of the Pharisees and Sadducees” (Matt. 16:11). meticulous and perceptive student of the Word of God.
His further word must have made them clear, for the next Govett says:
verse reads: “Then they understood that He did not say
to beware of the leaven of bread, but of the teaching of The twofoldness of truth as offered to our view in Holy
the Pharisees and Sadducees.” The Lord Jesus Himself Writ is one strong argument of its not being the work of
likens the teachings (i.e., the doctrines taught) of the man. It is the glory of man’s intellect to produce oneness.
Pharisees and the Sadducees to leaven. In Matthew 15:6 His aim is to trace different results to one principle, to
He told the scribes and Pharisees: “You have deprived clear it of ambiguities, to show how, through varied ap-
the word of God of its authority because of your tradi- pearances, one law holds. Anything that stands in the way
tion.” Therefore, quoting Isaiah, He could say: “In vain of the completeness of this, he eludes or denies (p. 3).
do they worship Me, teaching as teachings the command-
ments of men” (v. 9). When we put all these verses “But,” as Govett continues, “it is not so with God. In na-
together, we see that the leaven of the Pharisees is the tra- ture He is continually acting with two seemingly opposed
ditional teachings and commandments of men. According principles” (p. 3). Therefore, Govett says, “It is not then
to the Lord Jesus if these are added to the word of God, to be wondered at, if two seemingly opposed principles
or held equal to it, God’s word is deprived of its author- are found placed side by side in the Scripture. ‘Unity in
ity. As those who would honor God’s word in its purity plurality, plurality in unity’ is the main principle on which
and receive it in faith and obedience, we must reject the both the world and the Scripture are constructed” (p. 4).
January 1996 13
Regarding the apparently irreconcilable statements in Note Govett’s statement that this “master-truth…takes its
God’s Word, Govett remarks: “It is not necessary to rec- rise in the nature of the Godhead.” In other words, God’s
oncile them before we are bound to receive and act upon revelation of Himself in the Scriptures, being twofold, is
the two. It is enough that the Word of God distinctly af- an expression of the nature of God. The two aspects of
firms them both” (p. 6). “Their claim on our reception,” God’s intrinsic being—that He is three being one and one
Govett goes on to say, “is not that we can unite them, but being three—are testified by the twofoldness of the truth
that God has testified both” (p. 8). If we see this, we will of His revelation in the Scriptures. “From this twofoldness
realize that many debates regarding the truth in the Bible of truth designed difficulties arise. Thus does God try man-
kind. Thus does He try His people” (p. 20). And
thus does He try not only every theological sys-
Another prerequisite tem and school of thought but also everyone
who seeks to know the Triune God.
for knowing the Triune God
Many of today’s believers have been tried and
revealed in the Word of God found wanting, for they fail to maintain without
bias and distortion the twofoldness of the truth
is holding to the complete truth regarding the Trinity. Christians easily lapse into
an emphasis on God’s being three. Recognizing
revealed in the Bible and not merely that this tendency is common among believers,
Stuart Olyott expresses concern:
to the incomplete truths
It is probably true to say that many Christians, in
summarized in the creeds. their heart of hearts, tend to think of God more in
terms of His three-ness than His one-ness. They
think of Him more easily as Three than as One-in-
are unnecessary, for, in Govett’s words, “Opposite views three and Three-in-one. Such people…nurse an er-
of truth arise from different parts of the subject being ror in their hearts which keeps them from thinking of God
viewed at different times” (p. 9). Govett not only articu- as they should (The Three Are One, p. 87).
lates the twofoldness of divine truth but also expresses
forthrightly what the attitude of the Christian should be Recognizing that the truth concerning the Triune God is
toward the truth of God’s revelation: twofold is a requirement for knowing God in His trinity.
This twofoldness of the truth is embodied in the word
Thus does God try His people. Will they trust Him when triune, a Latin word composed of tri-, meaning three, and
He affirms that view of truth which runs counter to their -une, meaning one. To say that God is triune is to testify
temperaments and intellectual bias? or will they trample that He is three-one. He is uniquely one, yet He is dis-
on one of His sayings in their zeal for the other? The tinctly and inseparably three. In the Godhead the Father,
humble, child-like saint will acknowledge and receive the Son, and the Spirit are distinct but inseparable. In
both; for his Father, who cannot err, testifies to each God’s being one there is no separation among the Father,
alike…Will they receive both His statements on His sim- the Son, and the Spirit, and in God’s being three there is
ple assertion? Most will not, for they are one-sided. They a distinction among the Father, the Son, and the Spirit.
will force everything to unity.…They ignore all evidence The three of the Trinity cannot be separated, yet there is a
that tells against their views.…The Lord give us a single distinction among them. This is the twofoldness of the
eye, and the teaching of His Holy Spirit that each part of truth concerning the Triune God.
His Word may leave its due impression on our judg-
ments, our hearts, and our conduct! (pp. 11, 20, 23).
January 1996 15
Christ the Son, is our real food—bread for us to taste, the Spirit is in us (John 14:17). This Triune God—the
eat, digest, and assimilate. This is a subjective truth, a Father, the Son, and the Spirit—is the God who is now
truth concerning what God is to us in our personal spiri- operating in us (Phil. 2:13) and moving within us as the
tual experience. Several pairs of objective and subjective anointing (1 John 2:20, 27). When such a God enters
truths may be listed: Christ at the right hand of God into us for our experience and enjoyment, He remains the
(Rom. 8:34; Col. 3:1) and Christ in us (Rom. 8:10; Col. One on the throne (Rev. 22:1), yet He becomes our life
1:27); God’s love in sending His Son (1 John 4:9; Rom. and life supply.
5:8) and God’s love poured out into our hearts (Rom.
5:5); our crucifixion with Christ as an accomplished fact It is a marvelous fact that the objective Sovereign has be-
(Rom. 6:6; Gal. 2:20) and our experience of being con- come our inner life. Now we need to know Him both
formed to His death (Phil. 3:10); Christ’s resurrection as objectively as the One on the throne in heaven—the One
a once-for-all event (1 Cor. 15:4) and as a power for our outside of us in whom we believe and whom we wor-
daily experience (Phil. 3:10); sanctification as outward ship—and subjectively as the One in our spirit—the One
separation (Heb. 13:12) and as inward dispositional who dwells in us and who is making His home in our
change (Rom. 6:19, 22; 1 Thes. 5:23); the parakletos as heart (Eph. 3:17). How sad that those who are occupied
the Advocate with the Father (1 John 2:1) and as the with traditional doctrines, historic creeds, and theological
Comforter within us (John 14:16, 26; 15:26; 16:7); re- systems often neglect, and sometimes even oppose, the
generation as accomplished by God in the resurrection of subjective aspects of the truth! The Triune God both
Christ (1 Pet. 1:3) and as experienced by us in our spirit transcends us and indwells us, and thus we need to know
(John 3:6). This is only a representative sampling of the Him in a balanced way.
biblical balance of objective and subjective truths.
January 1996 17
to it. Nevertheless, we still need revelation: not a revela- Word. If we contact Him whenever we contact the
tion in addition to the Word but a revelation of what is in Word, we will receive Him as life, and in this life we will
the Word. A revelation is an unveiling, the removing of a know Him (John 17:3). “To come to the Scriptures and
veil. If we would receive revelation of what is disclosed to know all the letter of them is of no avail unless
concerning the Triune God in the written Word of God, through them we are led to the crucified Saviour to re-
we must face the fact that as we read the Bible, our heart ceive life from Him” (Law, The Power of the Spirit, p. 45).
may be covered with veils (2 Cor. 3:14-15). We may read
but may not see because we are veiled. Thus, we need to In John 6:63 the Lord Jesus says, “It is the Spirit who
be unveiled; we need revelation. Recognizing this, Paul gives life…the words which I have spoken to you are
prayed that the Father of glory would give us “a spirit of spirit and are life.” On the one hand, we should interpret
wisdom and revelation in the full knowledge of Him” and understand the Bible as literally as possible. This
(Eph. 1:17). Yet revelation, unveiling, is not sufficient; means that in our study of the Word, we should seek to
we also need light, the illumination that dispels our dark- understand the thought of God strictly and accurately ac-
ness, and sight, the capacity to see divine things. cording to the letter of the words. On the other hand, we
Realizing this, Paul need to touch the Word as spirit and life. If we fail to do
went on to pray that this, we may have the knowledge about God in letters,
the eyes of our heart but we will not know the Triune God Himself, for He is
would be enlight-
To know Him, a God of life, and His Word is the Word of life (1 John
ened (v. 18). Those we should 1:1). To know Him, we should understand the thought
who are in spiritual of God recorded in the letter of the Word and also receive
darkness or who are understand the the life of God conveyed in the spirit of the Word.
spiritually blind can-
thought of God
not know God. To
know Him we need
revelation in our
recorded in the T he Scripture is life because it is the breath of God, be-
cause it is the breathing out, the exhaling, of God.
This is proved by Paul’s word in 2 Timothy 3:16a: “All
spirit and light and letter of the Scripture is God-breathed.” The Bible is God’s breath, and
sight in our heart. God’s breath is the Spirit of God, for God is Spirit (John
Word and also 4:24). To say that all Scripture is God-breathed is to say
Sadly, many Chris- receive that the Bible is the breath, the breathing out, of the very
tians today, even God who is Spirit. What God breathes out we should
theologians, are like the life of God breathe in by reading the Bible prayerfully with much exer-
Job before God cise of spirit. Then we will receive the Word not only as
appeared to him.
conveyed in God’s thought but also as God’s breath. The more we re-
They have informa- the spirit of ceive the Triune God by receiving His breath through the
tion without reve- God-breathed Word, the more we will learn Him and
lation. Further, they the Word. know Him.
may mistake mere
doctrinal knowledge According to Paul’s exhortation in Ephesians 6:17-18 we
about God for genuine spiritual knowledge of God. If we should receive the sword of the Spirit, which Spirit is the
would be rescued from the former and ushered into the lat- word of God, by means of “all prayer,” that is, by means
ter, we must have spiritual vision, a combination of of all kinds of prayer. When we receive the word of God
revelation, light, and sight. by prayer, exercising our spirit, we breathe in God’s
breath and we touch the spirit and life in the Word. By
In addition, we need to come to the Word of God for reading we grasp the thought of God; by praying as we
life. “You search the Scriptures, because you think that in read we receive the life of God. If this kind of “pray-read-
them you have eternal life; and it is these that testify con- ing” becomes our daily practice, we will see the revelation
cerning Me. Yet you are not willing to come to Me that of God contained in the Word and will contact the very
you may have life” (John 5:39-40). This frank word, ut- God revealed in the Word. This is a crucial aspect of
tered by the Lord Jesus to the Jewish religionists, reveals knowing the Triune God revealed in the Word of God.
at least four crucial things: that the Scriptures testify con-
cerning Christ, the embodiment of the Triune God; that The Bible often speaks of feeding on the Word of God, of
we may search the Scriptures without coming to the receiving it as our life supply. A striking testimony of this
Lord; that we should come to the Lord whenever we is offered by the prophet Jeremiah: “Thy words were
come to the Word; and that when we come to the Lord found, and I ate them, / And Thy words became for me a
as we come to the Word, we receive life. We should never joy and the delight of my heart” (Jer. 15:16). Here we
separate the Word of God from the God revealed in the have three things: finding God’s words, eating the words
January 1996 19
According to the Scriptures, God is triune both essen- three stages of their economical work for the carrying out
tially—in His inner being—and economically—in the of God’s purpose.
outworking of His purpose with His chosen and re-
deemed people. However, so-called “historic Chris-
tianity,” having an unbalanced view, has emphasized the
essential Trinity but has paid less than adequate attention
A s a sharp contrast to modalism, tritheism is the belief
in three Gods. Whereas modalism stresses the side of
God’s being one to a heretical extreme by denying the eter-
to the economical Trinity. nal coexistence and coinherence of the three of the Godhead,
tritheism stresses the side of God’s being three to a heretical
The essential Trinity refers to the essence of the Triune extreme by teaching that the three of the Godhead are three
God for His existence. Essentially the Father, the Son, Gods. The Bible clearly and emphatically teaches that there
and the Spirit coexist and coinhere eternally at the same is only one God (1 Cor. 8:4; Isa. 44:6, 8; 45:5-6, 21-22;
time and in the same way without succession. Among the 46:9; Psa. 86:10). This foundational truth is jeopardized by
three of the Godhead, there is distinction but no separa- Christian theologians who claim that the Father, the Son,
tion. The Father is distinct from the Son and the Spirit; and the Spirit are three separate persons. If the distinctions
the Son is distinct from the Spirit and the Father; and the among the three of the Godhead are pressed to the point of
Spirit is distinct from the Father and the Son. However, separateness, as is commonly done, the result will be trithe-
we cannot, and we must not, say that the Father, the Son, ism. Regarding the use of the term person we should listen
and the Spirit are separate, for they coinhere, that is, they to W. H. Griffith Thomas:
dwell in one another. In their coexistence the Father, the
Son, and the Spirit are distinctly three, but in their coin- Like all human language, it is liable to be accused of inade-
herence they are inseparably one. Because the Father, the quacy and even positive error. It certainly must not be
Son, and the Spirit coexist in the way of coinherence, pressed too far, or it will lead to Tritheism. While we use the
they are distinct but not separate. term to denote distinctions in the Godhead, we do not imply
distinctions which amount to separateness, but distinctions
The economical Trinity refers to the Triune God in the which are associated with essential mutual co-inherence or
steps, or stages, of His move to carry out His economy for inclusiveness (The Principles of Theology, p. 31).
the fulfillment of His eternal purpose. In God’s economy,
God’s administrative arrangement, the Father has purposed In his article on the Trinity printed in Nelson’s Introduction to
in the Son and with the Spirit (Eph. 1:4-6—the first step); the Christian Faith, Klaas Runia voices a similar concern:
the Son has accomplished the Father’s purpose by the Spirit
and with the Father (vv. 7-12—the second step); and the The term ‘person’ is not adequate.…In recent years it has
Spirit, with the Father and the Son, applies what the Son been increasingly criticized. Today this term has a mean-
has accomplished according to the Father’s purpose (vv. 13- ing different from in the days of the church fathers. In the
14—the third step). While God’s economy is being carried first centuries it was a rather neutral word, pointing to a
out in these three successive steps by the economical Trin- personal relationship. Today a ‘person’ is a self-conscious,
ity, the essential Trinity—the eternal coexistence and autonomous individual. But if you apply this to the Trin-
coinherence of the Father, the Son, and the Spirit in the ity it sounds as if you are speaking of three Gods.…What
Godhead—remains intact and is not jeopardized. today we mean by the word ‘person’ applies to the divine
Being Himself rather than to the divine distinctions
If we would have a proper understanding of the Trinity, within the divine Being. There are not three individual
we must avoid two great trinitarian heresies—modalism personalities in God. There is only one divine Personality,
and tritheism. According to the modalistic concept of the which contains a threefold distinction (p. 116).
Trinity, the Father, the Son, and the Spirit are not eter-
nally coexistent and coinherent in the Godhead but are As we endeavor to know the Triune God revealed in the
merely three temporary and successive modes of God’s Word of God, we must acknowledge the twofoldness of
activity. Modalism thus denies that God is triune in His divine truth concerning the Divine Trinity and follow the
inner being, insisting that God’s revealing Himself as Fa- Scriptures to take a middle way by believing in and teach-
ther, Son, and Spirit in no way corresponds to anything ing a balanced Trinity. If we are faithful in this matter, we
in the ultimate nature of the Godhead (Henry Chadwick, will testify that God is triune both essentially and eco-
The Early Church, p. 87). For the modalists the Father, nomically, and we will castigate and repudiate the
the Son, and the Spirit refer only to the way in which heresies of both modalism and tritheism.
God reveals Himself but bear no resemblance to His in-
ner being (F. F. Bruce, The Spreading Flame, p. 256). In God’s Economy and the Believers’ Experience
contrast to modalism, the Bible reveals that, from eternity
to eternity, the Father, the Son, and the Spirit exist essen- In the New Testament particular emphasis is placed
tially in their coinherence and coexistence, even during the on the revelation of the Triune God in His economy
January 1996 21
systematic theological understanding but for a dispensing possessing His life. That the divine life has the special
which results in spiritual experience is in 2 Corinthians function of knowing God is indicated by the words of the
13:14: “The grace of the Lord Jesus Christ and the love Lord Jesus in John 17:2-3: “You have given Him [the
of God and the fellowship of the Holy Spirit be with you Son] authority over all flesh to give eternal life to all
all.” This is the Triune God dispensed into us for our ex- whom You have given Him. And this is eternal life, that
perience and enjoyment. The love of God the Father is the they may know You, the only true God, and Him whom
source; the grace of Christ the Son is the outflow, the You have sent, Jesus Christ.” To be sure, the life of God
course, of the love of God; and the fellowship of the Holy is able to know God. Because as believers we have been
Spirit is the flowing into us of the grace of the Son with born of the divine life and now have the divine life, we
the love of the Father. Day by day we may enjoy the Tri- are able to know God in the divine life. The life of God,
une God by participating in the love of God the Father, in which is actually the Triune God Himself as life, has been
the grace of Christ the Son, and in the fellowship of God dispensed into us and has given us the ability to know
the Spirit. God.