Lifo and Fifo
Lifo and Fifo
Lifo and Fifo
Meaning
Conclusion
Meaning:
Materials purchased are kept in stores and issued to different jobs or work
orders. These jobs or work orders are charged with the cost of materials issued to
them. This is called pricing of material issues.
Prices paid for purchases made at different times may be different. While
issuing these materials, it is essential to consider the price at which it should be
charged to jobs or work orders.
There are different methods of pricing materials issues. The selection of a
proper method of pricing of material issues depends on many factors.
1) Nature of business.
2) Frequency of purchase of materials
3) Durability of stock
4) Length of inventory turnover period
5) Range of price fluctuations etc.
Methods of Pricing Material Issues:
Some important and mostly used methods of pricing of material issues are as
follows.
Advantages:
The following are the advantages of FIFO method.
i) It is simple to understand and easy to operate.
ii) It is based on logical and sound principle that materials are issued in
order of purchase.
iii) The closing stock is valued at a more recent price.
iv) Materials are priced at actual cost hence no unrealised profit or loss
arises.
v) Deterioration and obsolescence can be avoided by exhausting oldest
materials at the time of issue.
Disadvantages:
This method suffers from the following disadvantages.
i) The calculation becomes difficult and complicated when purchases
are made very frequently at different prices.
ii) Issue price does not reflect current market price.
iii) Cost of production tends to be high during the period of falling
prices.
iv) The pricing of material returns is difficult.
v) Cost comparison between two similar job becomes difficult when
issues are priced differently.
Disadvantage:
The main disadvantages of LIFO method are as follows.
i) Calculations become complicated when rates of receipts are highly
fluctuating.
ii) Closing stock are not valued at current market price. It is valued at
unreal and outdate cost.
iii) The stocks require to be adjusted during falling prices.
iv) Due to variation of prices, comparison of cost of similar job is not
possible.
v) This method is not useful in case of perishable materials.
vi) Inventories may be depleted due to unavailability of materials to the
point of consuming inventories valued at older or perhaps the oldest
prices. This situation will create a miss matching of current revenue
and cost, sometimes companies using this costing method counteract
this problem by establishing an allowance for replacement of the
LIFO inventory account. Cost of goods sold is charged with current
cost. The allowance account is credited for the access of the current
replacement cost over the LIFO carrying cost for the inventory
temporarily liquidated. When this inventory is replenished, the
temporary allowance (credit) is removed and the goods acquired are
placed in inventory at their old last in first out cost.
Simple Average Method:
Under this method materials are issued at the average price of materials on
hand on the date of issue. The simple average price is calculated dividing the
total of all rates of material in hand by the number of rates.
Issuing materials at an average cost assumes that each batch taken from the
storeroom is composed of uniform quantities from each shipment in stock at the
date of issue. Often it is not feasible to mark or label each materials item with
an invoice price in order to identify the used units with its acquisition cost. It
may be reasoned that units are issued more or less at random as for as the
specific units and the specific costs are concerned and that an average cost of all
units in stock at the time of issue is satisfactory measure of materials cost.
However, average costing may be used even though the physical withdrawal is
an identifiable order. If materials tend to be made up of numerous small items
low in unit cost and especially if prices are subject to frequent changes.
The lot which is exhausted, based on FIFO method is excluded in
computing the average.
Rate of Issue = Total of Different Rates/ No. of Rates
This method is useful when the materials are received in uniform quantities
and purchase prices are normally stable.
Advantages:
Following are the advantages of simple average method.
i) This method is easy to operate.
ii) It gives reasonably accurate results if prices are stable.
iii) It is a realistic costing method useful to management in analysing
operating results and appraising future production.
iv) It minimizes the effect of unusually high or low materials prices,
thereby making possible more stable cost estimates for future work.
v) It is practical and less expensive perpetual inventory system.
Disadvantage:
Following are the disadvantages of simple average method.
i) Materials are not priced at actual costs.
ii) It does not take into account the quantity of materials purchased.
iii) Verification of closing stock becomes difficult.
iv) When price and quantity of different lots are widely fluctuates, this
method gives incorrect result.
The average costing method divides the total cost of all materials of a
particular class by the number of units on hand to find the average price. The
cost of new invoices is added to the total in the balance column; the units are
added to the existing quantity; and the new total cost is divided by the new
quantity to arrive at the new average cost. Materials are issued at the
established average cost until a new purchase is recorded. Although a new
average cost may be computed when materials are returned to vendors and
when excess issues are returned to the storeroom, for practical purposes, it
seems sufficient to reduce or increase the total quantity and cost, allowing the
unit price to remain unchanged. When a new purchase is made and a new
average is computed, the discrepancy created by the returns will be absorbed.
Disadvantages:
The sales made on January 5 and 10 were clearly made from purchases on 1st
January. Of the sales made on January 25, it will be assumed that 2 bikes relate
to purchases on January 1 whereas the remaining one bike has been issued from
the purchases on 15th January. Therefore, the value of inventory under FIFO is
as follows:
Date Purchase Issues Closing Inventory
Units Rs. /Units Total Units Rs. /Units Total Units Rs. /Units Total
Jan 10 - - - 1 50 50 2 50 100
Jan 15 - - - - - - 7 - 450
Jan 25 - - - 2 50 100 - - -
- - - 1 70 70 4 70 280
As can be seen from above, the inventory cost under FIFO method relates to
the cost of the latest purchases, i.e., Rs.70.
Assume a product is made in three batches during the year. The costs and
quantity of each batch (in order of when they are produced) are as follows:
Total produced: 5,200 pieces. Total cost: Rs.22,700. The average cost to
produce one piece: Rs.4.37.
To determine the cost of units sold, under LIFO accounting, you start with
the assumption that you have sold the most recent (last items) produced first and work
backward.
Let's say 4,000 units were sold during the year. Using LIFO, you assume
that Batch 3 items were sold first. Thus, the first 1,700 units sold from the last batch
cost Rs.4.53 per unit. That's a total of Rs.7,701.
The next 1,500 units sold from Batch 2 cost Rs.4.67 per unit, for a total of
Rs.7,005.
And the last 800 units sold from Batch 1 cost Rs.4 each, for a total of Rs.3,200.
The total cost of the 4000 items sold is Rs.17,906.
The cost of the remaining 1200 units from the first batch is Rs.4 each for a
total of Rs.4,800. These units will start off the next year.
Material issue with simple average method = total of unit cost of each purchase/ total
no. of units
= 3 +4+2/3 = Rs. 3
WeightedAverage=
Sum of Weighted Terms Total Number of Terms Weighted Average = Sum of
Weighted Terms Total Number of Terms
To find the weighted term, multiply each term by its weighting factor, which is the
number of times each term occurs.
Solved Example
Example 1: A class of 25 students took a science test. 10 students had an average
score of 80. The other students had an average score of 60. What is the average score
of the whole class?
Solution:
Step 1: To get the sum of weighted terms, multiply each average by the number of
students that had that average and then add them up.
80 × 10 + 60 × 15 = 800 + 900 = 1700
i.e., Sum of weighted terms = 1700
Step 2: Total number of terms = Total number of students = 25
Step 3: Using the formula,
WeightedAverage=SumofWeightedTermsTotalNumberofTermsWeightedAverage=Su
mofWeightedTermsTotalNumberofTerms
= 1700/25
= 68
Answer: The average score of the whole class is 68.
This ratio is a relationship between the cost of goods sold during a particular period of
time and the cost of average inventory during a particular period. It is expressed in
number of times. The Inventory turnover ratio indicates the number of times the stock
has been replaced during the period and evaluates the efficiency with which a firm is
able to manage its inventory. This ratio indicates whether investment in stock is within
proper limit or not.
Average inventory and cost of goods sold are the two elements of this ratio. Average
inventory is calculated by adding the stock in the beginning and at the end of the
period and dividing it by two. In case of monthly balances of stock, all the monthly
balances are added and the total is divided by the
number of months for which the average is calculated.
The ratio is calculated by dividing the cost of goods sold by the amount of average
stock at cost.
Generally, the cost of goods sold may not be known from the published financial
statements. In such circumstances, the inventory turnover ratio may be calculated by
dividing net sales by average inventory at cost. If average inventory at cost is not
known then inventory at selling price may be taken as the denominator and where the
opening inventory is also not known the closing inventory
figure may be taken as the average inventory.
Example:
The cost of goods sold is 500,000. The opening stock is 40,000 and the closing stock
is 60,000 (at cost).
Significance of ITR:
Inventory turnover ratio measures the velocity of conversion of stock into sales.
Usually a high inventory turnover/stock velocity indicates efficient management of
inventory because more frequently the stocks are sold; the lower amount of money is
required to finance the inventory. A low inventory turnover ratio indicates an
inefficient management of inventory. A low inventory turnover implies over-
investment in inventories, dull business, poor quality of goods, stock accumulation,
accumulation of obsolete and slow moving goods and low profits as compared to total
investment.
The inventory turnover ratio is also an index of profitability, where a high ratio
signifies more profit; a low ratio signifies low profit. Sometimes, a high inventory
turnover ratio may not be accompanied by relatively high profits. Similarly a high
turnover ratio may be due to under-investment in inventories.
It may also be mentioned here that there are no rule of thumb or standard for
interpreting the inventory turnover ratio. The norms may be different for different
firms depending upon the nature of industry and business conditions. However the
study of the comparative or trend analysis of inventory turnover is still useful for
financial analysis.
Indicates the length of time that it will take to use up the inventory through sales.
Ending Inventory
Cost of Goods Sold ÷ 365
The company made inventory purchases each month for Q1 for a total of
3,000 units. However, the company already had 1,000 units of older inventory that
was purchased at Rs.8 each for an Rs.8,000 valuation. In other words, the beginning
inventory was 4,000 units for the period.
The company sold 3,000 units in Q1, which left an ending inventory balance of 1,000
units or (4,000 units - 3,000 units sold = 1,000 units).
Purchases 37,00037,00037,000
Expenses 10,00010,00010,000
COGS Valuation
Under LIFO, COGS was valued at Rs.37,000 because the 3,000 units
that were purchased most recently were used in the calculation or the January,
February, and March purchases (Rs.10,000 + Rs.12,000 + Rs.15,000).
Under FIFO, COGS was valued at Rs.30,000 because FIFO uses the
oldest inventory first and then the January and February inventory purchases. In other
words, the 3,000 units comprised of (1,000 units for Rs.8,000) + (1,000 units for
Rs.10,000 or Jan.) + (1,000 units for Rs.12,000 or Feb.). The average cost method
resulted in a valuation of Rs.11,250 or ((Rs.8,000 + Rs.10,000 + Rs.12,000 +
Rs.15,000) / 4).
CONCLUSION: