USCOURTS-caed-2 - 10-cv-02478-7 IMP CONTACT INFO
USCOURTS-caed-2 - 10-cv-02478-7 IMP CONTACT INFO
USCOURTS-caed-2 - 10-cv-02478-7 IMP CONTACT INFO
10
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
14 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and ) Case No. 2:10-CV-2478 MCE EFB
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ex rel. )
15 DEREK HOGGETT and TAVIS GOOD, ) [
) ORDER GRANTING RELATORS LEAVE TO
16 ) FILE THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR
Plaintiffs, ) DAMAGES, WITH DEMAND FOR JURY
17 ) TRIAL
)
18 vs. )
) )
19 )
UNIVERSITY OF PHOENIX, APOLLO )
20 GROUP, INC., and DOES 1 through 100, )
Inclusive, )
21 )
)
22 Defendants. )
)
23 ___________________________________ )
24
Relators Derek Hoggett and Tavis Good have moved the Court for leave to file a "Third
25
Amended Complaint for Damages, with Demand for Jury Trial." Relators’ proposed Third
26
27 Amended Complaint seeks only to add a new paragraph 10(a) to its predecessor.
1 The Court considers five factors in assessing the propriety of leave to amend — bad faith,
2 undue delay, prejudice to the opposing party, futility of amendment, and whether the plaintiff has
3
previously amended the complaint. Johnson v. Buckley, 356 F.3d 1067, 1077 (2004). Here, there is
4
no evidence of delay, prejudice, bad faith, or previous amendments beyond one amendment to
5
correct a clerical error. Therefore, leave to amend turns on whether amendment would be futile.
6
7 Here, in response to Defendants' assertion that Relators failed to give pre-filing notice to the
8 Department of Education, Relators now allege, in revised paragraph 10(a) of the proposed Third
9 Amended Complaint, additional details supporting Relators' claim that pre-filing complaints about
10
Defendants' conduct – paying Enrollment Counselors based on the number of students enrolled,
11
were made to the U.S. Department of Education ("ED"). As indicated above, Defendants do not
12
oppose that amendment.
13
GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Relators’ motion for leave
14
15 to amend and file a Third Amended Complaint be, and it hereby is, GRANTED.1 Relators are
16 directed to file their proposed Third Amended Complaint within twenty (20) days of the order being
17 electronically filed.
18
Dated: October 17, 2013
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
1
Because oral argument was not of material assistance, the Court ordered this matter submitted on the briefs. E.D. Cal.
28 Local Rule 230(g).
2.
Case 2:10-cv-02478-MCE-EFB Document 75 Filed 10/18/13 Page 3 of 4
2
3
4
5
6
7 PROOF OF SERVICE
1
I declare under penalty of perjury, under the laws of the State of California, that the
2 foregoing is true and correct and that this declaration was executed on this 31st day of July, 2013, in
San Rafael, Marin County, California.
3
4
By:_s___________________________________
/
5 Daniel Robert Bartley
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4.