Sop LPFR
Sop LPFR
Sop LPFR
LPFR
8 Jan 2023
0.0
Contents
1 General 4
1.1 Distribution and Scope . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
1.2 Airport Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
1.3 Runways and Declared Distances . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
1.4 Radio Navigation Aids . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
1.5 Landing Aids . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
1.6 Approach Procedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
1.6.1 Intrument Approaches . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
1.6.2 Visual Approaches . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
1.7 Holdings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
1.8 Preferential Runway Configuration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
1.8.1 Runway Changes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
1.9 Transition Altitude and Transition Level . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
1.10 Positions and Responsibilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
1.10.1 Faro Airport . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
1.10.2 Adjacent Positions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
1.11 Transfers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
1.12 Separation Minima . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
1.13 Flight Planning . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
1.13.1 VFR . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
1.13.2 IFR . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
1.14 Low Visibility Procedures (LVP) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
2 Ground (GND) 19
2.1 General . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
2.2 Area of Responsibility . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
2.2.1 Departures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
2.2.2 Arrivals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
2.2.3 Stand assignment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
2.2.3.1 Apron N . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
2.2.3.2 Apron S . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
2.2.3.3 Apron NE/SE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
2.2.3.4 Apron SW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
2.2.3.5 Apron NW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
2.2.4 Restrictions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
3 Tower (TWR) 23
3.1 General . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
3.2 Area of Responsibility . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
3.3 Procedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
3.3.1 Departures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
3.3.2 Arrivals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
3.3.3 Go arounds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
3.3.4 Reduced Runway Separation Minima . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
3.3.5 VFR Traffic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
3.3.6 Low Visibility Procedures (LVP) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
4 Approach (APP) 28
4.1 Area of Responsibility . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
4.2 Departures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
4.3 SID Deviations/Directs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
4.4 Arrivals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33
4.4.1 Delays . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33
4.4.2 Approach Sector . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33
4.4.3 Speed Restrictions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34
4.5 Nearby Aerodromes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35
4.5.1 Portimão LPPM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36
4.5.2 Lagos (UL - Ultraleves/Ultralight) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37
4.5.3 Lagos (Heliporto) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37
4.5.4 Barlavento Algarvio Hosp Hel LPBA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37
4.5.5 Faro Hosp Hel LPFO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37
4.5.6 Loulé Hel LPLO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37
4.5.7 Morgado de Apra Hel LPMB . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38
4.5.8 Monchique . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38
4.5.9 Praia Verde [UL - Ultraleves/Ultralight] . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38
SOP LPFR P4
Chapter 1
General
The procedures laid here are of mandatory use while controlling on the Network and shall never be
adopted for real world use.
ICAO LPFR
IATA FAO
RWY Total
10
2490x45
28
10
28
Should a pilot request another type of instrument approach it should be accommodated, as no significant
impact is expected. In Euroscope, assign the corresponding STAR+APP or only APP in the STAR field of
the Sector List. No further coordination is required.
1.7 Holdings
In case of calm or cross winds, refer to the weather forecast to determine which runway to use and avoid
unnecessary runway changes.
If both runways are suitable, prefer the use of RWY28
Try to plan ahead as much as possible to avoid a runway change in a period of high traffic. Weather
forecasts and tools to see VATSIM traffic are a good help. Together decide who will be the last departure
and the last arrival. All subsequent traffic will be cleared/recleared to the new runway.
QNH From 942.2 From 959.5 From 977.2 From 995.1 From From 1031.7
to 959.4 to 977.1 to 995.0 to 1013.2 1013.3 to 1050.3
to 1031.6
TL 70 65 60 55 50 45
1.11 Transfers
From To Conditions/Remarks
TWR APP Automatic handoff after departure. Give a firm goodbye to increase
chances of pilot switching to APP frequency automatically
Flights below FL240 to LPPT are coordinated directly with LPPT_APP or LPPT_U_APP.
• 5Nm
1.13.1 VFR
No requirements are in place for VFR departures from LPFR.
1.13.2 IFR
North departures route via:
• LVP in force shall be communicated to the pilot during the clearance or during the initial contact
with APP (ATIS URL should also be changed to inform about LVP - (...)lvp=true)
• Holding position of the runway will be the CAT II holding point (change the Ground Radar Plugin to
LVP operation)
• Do not issue conditional clearances relying on visual references (when clear of traffic, P/S approved,
behind landing traffic, line up and wait behind, etc.)
• Do not issue conflicting taxi clearances. Issue shorter taxi clearances that do not intersect other
taxi clearances. Progressively issue new clearances until reaching the CAT II holding point;
• Wait until the preceding traffic has vacated the taxi segment before issuing a new clearance using
it;
• As we are unable to light up stop bars, separate traffic on the ground by issuing holding clearances
at various taxiways (max. 1 traffic per taxiway segment/holding);
• Issue landing clearances no later than 2NM final and only if the ILS sensitive area is clear;
• Inform about RVR during takeoff, landing and continue approach clearances.
Chapter 2
Ground (GND)
2.1 General
Faro airport is not equipped with ground radar. Pilots are not obliged to operate the transponder on the
ground.
If there is the need for the pilot to hold short of any position, issue the taxi instruction until that position,
no further.
During normal operations, aim to have 3 planes at the holding point (maximum 5). During events, be
flexible with this, however there are no gains in having 10 planes at the holding point.
Do not issue conflicting taxi clearances. If two taxi routes cross each other, the second pilot should be
given a holding instruction. It is also important to keep pilots informed of traffic that will cross and who
has priority.
Departures have priority over arrivals regarding taxi/pushback. Sometimes it can be better to give priority
to the arrival to ease traffic flow.
Faro Ground will provide departure information and enroute clearance. Departure information shall
consist of ATIS letter and QNH (when ATIS is inoperative, provide departure runway, wind and QNH, in
this order).
Enroute clearance shall consist of the clearance limit, assigned SID, initial climb and assigned squawk
code. Clearance limit shall always be the destination aerodrome.
Additionally, it will task the administrative roles of validating flight plans, creating the departure sequence,
calculating departure delays when needed, and will be responsible for all ground movement except those
on the runway.
2.2.1 Departures
RNAV equipped aircraft shall preferentially be given RNAV SIDs (RWY28: V departures, RWY 10: G
departures.).
Non-RNAV equipped aircraft shall be given conventional SIDs (RWY28: U departures, RWY 10: E
departures).
ODEMIxU departure is usable only between 0800z and 2200z due to noise abatement. Assign ODEMI_S
departure instead.
During activation of LP-R51B resulting in a SFL higher that FL110, ALAGU and EVURA departures are
not available. Assign XAPAS departure.
During activation of LP-TRA13 resulting in a SFL higher than FL160, SOTEX departures are not available.
Assign XAPAS departure.
XAPAS departures only to be used if necessary to route via XAPAS-ELDUK-ODPAK during activation of
TRA13 and/or R51B at higher levels.
Aircraft parked on apron SW or S will often be nose out, and do not require pushback.
Aircraft parked on stands 314 and 316 pushback to taxiway A.
2.2.2 Arrivals
Aircraft code letter C and larger destination apron SW shall enter via taxiway A.
2.2.3.2 Apron S
Charter
2.2.3.4 Apron SW
General/Executive Aviation
2.2.3.5 Apron NW
Cargo/Diversions/Other suitable
2.2.4 Restrictions
Taxilanes A restricted to aircraft wingspan up to 44 meters (B752 max).
Chapter 3
Tower (TWR)
3.1 General
In a constant flow of traffic, the normal sequence will be a departure, a landing, a departure, a landing
and so on.
Faro Tower is responsible for runway 28/10 and the CTR airspace as defined in AIP. Vertical limits are
defined as surface up to 2000ft. The VFR tunnel crosses the CTR, at a maximum altitude of 2000FT.
3.3 Procedures
3.3.1 Departures
Issue line up clearance only when the departure is near the holding point and the arrival is at 5DME or
greater from the threshold. Make good use of “Behind TFC on final/landing runway 28, via XX lineup and
wait behind”
Keep in mind some pilots, especially text ones, will be slower than others complying with clearances,
particularly, starting the takeoff run. Plan ahead to avoid go arounds.
3.3.2 Arrivals
Remember you can issue speed restrictions for traffic on ILS, but avoid asking them to reduce to minimum
approach speed too early, unless necessary.
If you feel that the separation on final is too short, inform the APP controller and ask for a bigger
separation
3.3.3 Go arounds
In case of a go around, the published missed approach is the following:
Avoid modifying the procedure right away, as doing so increases an already high workload situation for
the pilot even further.
Do not forget to apply wake turbulence separation between the missed approach and ensuing departing
aircraft.
Alternatively, VFR traffic can follow the shoreline. In case of departures or arrivals, the clearance limit to
enter the CTR is MARINA DE VILAMOURA or FUSETA.
If the VFR traffic is already inside the CTR, in case of IFR arrivals or departures, ILHA DO FAROL, PRAIA
DE FARO or MONTENEGRO provide good visual holding points.
Landing clearance must be issued before 2DME. Instruct a go-around if an arrival reaches 2DME without
landing clearance.
Report RVR when METAR includes it. Report Cloud Base Height if less than 400ft AAL.
Chapter 4
Approach (APP)
The vast majority of traffic arrives and departs to the North, due to the type of flights that most commonly
connect Faro as a holiday destination to the UK, Northern and Central Europe.
Beja MCTA neighbours Faro to the north. It is divided in Beja North and Beja South.
They are vertically delimited from 1000FT AGL to FL105, but for the most time will be delegated to Lisboa
ACC above FL055. However they might need to individually change the SFL, as high as FL250.
If a different level is required, the SFL label will be updated, or Beja will inform Faro and Lisboa directly.
Beja South further delegates a portion of its airspace, south of XAPAS, to Faro above FL55.
Lisboa also delegates a portion of its airspace to Faro, north of its TMA. However, most of this delegation
sits on top of Beja MCTA, who will own the airspace below whatever SFL is in use.
Spanish airspace neighbors to the east, with a big mix of various types of airspace.
Controlled airspace by Seville above FL145, uncontrolled below.
Airways extend controlled airspace down to FL095.
Several Spanish Danger areas exist by the border, with different kinds of activities within, ranging through
Air to Air refueling, Air to Air, Anti-aircraft, rocket, and missile firing. They are not always active, their
activity will be announced by NOTAM, and shown to the controller by an area with a label showing the
area name, followed by “OCUPADA”.
LP-TRA13 is a training area that can be activated on a schedule, from the surface without a maximum
level defined. Despite this, when active it will generally occupy lower levels, generating low impact to
Faro.
To facilitate traffic when Beja or TRA13 are active and occupying high levels, there exists a corridor that
can be used to cross Beja. This corridor can be used by departures, arrivals, or both. See Ground
Departures and Approach Arrivals for details.
4.2 Departures
Initial climb will be FL060 or cruise altitude, if lower.
Issue climb as needed, until FL240 or cruise altitude, whichever is lower and handoff the aircraft to the
CTR controller before he reaches FL240, in order to aim for a continuous climb, or when approaching the
lateral limits.
As most of the departures are towards the same direction as most arrivals, conflicts between both are
common, especially when issuing shortcuts.
By design, north departures will fly North, parallel to the arrivals, and eventually cross their path.
It is recommended to let departures continue parallel to arrivals, until vertical separation exists, before
issuing shortcuts. Experience shows this will typically happen before reaching the SID termination point.
Some departure procedures are designed very close to the border with Spanish airspace. Do not issue
shortcuts that route east of the ALAGU SID.
Departures to the Northeast via Lisboa CENTRE sector are very prone to the same problem. ELVAR is
recommended to prevent sector clipping with Madrid, or inadvertent penetration of segregated airspace
4.4 Arrivals
All STARs are RNAV. RNAV aircraft will be given a STAR. Non-RNAV will proceed to VFA, and vectored
to the approach.
Lisboa will prefer to clear ODEMI arrivals via the shorter ODEMI_A STAR over land, instead of the
ODEMI_B arrival over the sea. If the alternative is beneficial to Faro (for instance, to deconflict with
departures), Faro should coordinate with Lisboa to assign so.
Typical strategy is to offer a shortcut as soon as practical to FR607/GEBTI for runway 28, VENOL runway
10.
Some arrival procedures are designed very close to the border with Spanish airspace. Do not issue
shortcuts that route east of the ALAGU STAR, to prevent sector clipping with Madrid, or inadvertent
penetration of segregated airspace.
During activation of LP-R51B resulting in a SFL higher than FL110, ALAGU arrivals are not available.
Lisboa will assign ODPAK-ELDUK-XAPAS-MARIM arrival runway 28.
During activation of LP-TRA13 resulting in a SFL higher than FL160, SOTEX arrivals are not available.
Lisboa will assign ODPAK-ELDUK-XAPAS-USALU arrival runway 10.
If both R51B and TRA13 are active at high levels, both arrivals and departures must route through
ODPAK-ELDUK-XAPAS and vice versa. Vertical separation will be the only method available to separate
traffic.
4.4.1 Delays
If possible, delays should be accomplished by assigning speed restrictions. If needed, coordinate with
the Area Sector to issue speed restrictions when the traffic is still far away from Faro.
If speed restrictions are not enough, delay vectors can be used to increase the delay of one or two
arrivals. If more is required, revert to holding.
• 6NM
Default to 6NM (12NM during LVP), as Tower expects to depart one aircraft in between each arrival.
Aim to vector arrivals to GEBTI/VENOL at 3000’ or VFA at 3000’ for ILS Y (Both RWYs). Consider
shortcutting the preceding traffic via 6/9NM final (Runway 28) or FR455/6NM final (Runway 10) to help
achieve the desired separation and sequencing. To do so, first confirm if the aircraft is in sight of terrain,
and after positive confirmation, descend to 2000FT and instruct to proceed direct to the point.
Phase Speed
Portimão has a rectangular ATZ until 1000FT, and a pentagonal Responsibility and Communications
Transfer Area until 2000FT, as per the above illustration.
Flights within the area below 2000ft are to be performed on local frequency.
VFR flights leaving Portimão must proceed to one of the published entry/outbound points and report
them on Faro Approach 119.400 with their intentions.
Arrivals to Portimão will be assigned an entry point, and when reaching that point, radar services
terminated and handed off to the local frequency.
• Barragem de Odiáxere
• Caldas de Monchique
• Silves
• Carvoeiro
• Lagos
IFR arrivals descend to FL050 towards the field. When the pilot reports VFR, further descent can be
issued as necessary. When in visual contact with the field, clear for a visual approach, terminate radar
services and handoff to local frequency.
If weather conditions preclude the previous, the arrival can either descend according to MRVA, or be
offered an Instrument Approach at Faro to break below the cloud layer and continue VFR to Portimão.
Parachuting activity is performed daily within a circle of 3NM of the field, up to FL150. Users shall
coordinate it first with Faro Approach. The activity itself is usually carried out on Portimão local Frequency.
User shall report the end of activity to Faro.
Lagos is located nearby Portimão, on the western side of the Algarve coast, mainly used for Ultralight
aviation. Caution with traffic leaving Portimão ATZ.
Request to report final and remain clear of Extended Runway Centerline, while giving traffic information
to other traffic.
If weather conditions do not allow to keep both the helicopter and the remaining traffic in sight, Runway
28 approaches/runway 10 departures must be suspended until the helicopter has landed.
Request to report final, and give traffic information as required. No impact in other traffic expected.
Base of HTA Helicópteros, a private aerial work, maintenance, and helicopter training company.
4.5.8 Monchique
Fire fighting heliport, situated well north of Portimão in Serra de Monchique, at an elevation of 1437FT.
Praia Verde is located on the east side of the south coast of Algarve, near the Spanish border.
Appendix A