Full Document
Full Document
Full Document
Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the award of the degree of
BACHELOR OF TECHNOLOGY
In
By
R. JYOTHI (17D21A04B2)
2020-2021
SRIDEVI WOMEN’S ENGINEERING COLLEGE
Accredited by NBA & NAAC
(Affiliated to Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University, Hyderabad)
V.N. PALLY, GANDIPET, R.R. DIST-500075
Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering
BONAFIDE CERTIFICATE
This is to certify that the technical seminar report on “SOLAR CELL
TECHNOLOGY” is the bonafide work of R. JYOTHI (17D21A04B2) who carried
out the technical seminar under my supervision, in partial fulfilment of the
requirements for the award of the degree of Bachelor of Technology in
ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATION ENGINEERING from Sridevi
Women‘s Engineering College, affiliated to Jawaharlal Nehru Technological
University, Hyderabad.
Coordinator
Dr. K. MOHAN RAM
Professor
DECLARATION
I hereby declare that the work described in this report, entitled “SOLAR CELL
TECHNOLOGY” which is being submitted by me in partial fulfilment for the award
of Bachelor of Technology in the Department of ELECTRONICS AND
COMMUNICATION ENGINEERING to the SRIDEVI WOMEN’S
ENGINEERING COLLEGE, Affiliated to Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University
Hyderabad, Kukatpally. The work is original and has not been submitted for any
Degree/Diploma of this or any other University.
R. JYOTHI (17D21A04B2)
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
With great pleasure I want to take this opportunity to express my gratitude to
all the people who helped in making this Technical seminar work a grand success.
I would like to thank the Teaching & Non- Teaching staff of ECE
Department for sharing their knowledge with us.
Last but not the least I express my sincere thanks to the Management of
Sridevi Women’s Engineering College for their continuous care towards my
achievements.
R. JYOTHI (17D21A04B2)
i
ABSTRACT
Despite the seemingly unlimited growth potential of the solar industry, there is
one major problem facing the PV industry the cost of burying and installing a solar
system is more expensive than conventional electricity. The more power coming out
of the cell makes all the components less expensive relative to the power produced.
ii
CONTENTS
List of Contents Page. No.
Acknowledgement i
Abstract ii
List of Figures iv
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 What is a Solar cell 1
CHAPTER 2 HISTORYOF SOLAR CELL 2
2.1 History and Development of Solar Cell 2
Technology
CHAPTER 3 GENERATION OF SOLAR CELL 3
3.1 First Generation: Crystalline Silicon Solar 3
Cell Technology
3.2 Second Generation: Thin Film Solar Cell 3
Technology
3.3 Third Generation: Dye-Sensitized Solar 4
Cell Technology
CHAPTER 4 WORKING OF SOLAR CELL 5
4.1 Pure Silicon (Intrinsic) Crystalline 5
Structure
4.2 Formation of Potential Barrier and 6
Photoelectric Effect
CHAPTER 5 MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY 8
AND PROCESS
5.1 Manufacturing Technology and Process 8
CHAPTER 6 APLLICATIONS 12
6.1 Rural Electrification 12
6.2 Electric power generation in Space 15
CAHPTER 7 EFFICIENCY OF SOLAR CELL 17
CONCLUSION 31
REFERENCES 32
iii
LIST OF FIGURES
iv
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
1.1 What is a solar cell?
Assemblies of solar cells are used to make solar modules which are used to
capture energy from sunlight. When multiple modules are assembled together (such as
prior to installation on a pole-mounted tracker system), the resulting integrated group
of modules all oriented in one plane is referred as a solar panel. The electrical energy
generated from solar modules, is an example of solar energy. Photovoltaics is the field
of technology and research related to the practical application of photovoltaic cells in
producing electricity from light, though it is often used specifically to refer to the
generation of electricity from sunlight. Cells are described as photovoltaic cells when
the light source is not necessarily sunlight. These are used for detecting light or other
electromagnetic radiation near the visible range, for example infrared detectors, or
measurement of light intensity.
1
CHAPTER 2
The development of solar cell technology began with the 1839 research of
French physicist Antoine-César Becquerel. Becquerel observed the photovoltaic
effect while experimenting with a solid electrode in an electrolyte solution when he
saw a voltage develop when light fell upon the electrode. The major events are
discussed briefly below, and other milestones can be accessed by clicking on the
image shown below.
Charles Fritts – First Solar Cell: The first genuine solar cell was built around
1883 by Charles Fritts, who used junctions formed by coating selenium (a
semiconductor) with an extremely thin layer of gold. The device was only about 1
percent efficient.
Russell Ohl – Silicon Solar Cell: Early solar cells, however, had energy
conversion efficiencies of under one percent. In 1941, the silicon solar cell was
invented by Russell Ohl.
Gerald Pearson, Calvin Fuller and Daryl Chapin – Efficient Solar Cells: In
1954, three American researchers, Gerald Pearson, Calvin Fuller and Daryl Chapin,
designed a silicon solar cell capable of a six percent energy conversion efficiency
with direct sunlight. They created the first solar panels. Bell Laboratories in New
York announced the prototype manufacture of a new solar battery. Bell had funded
the research. The first public service trial of the Bell Solar Battery began with a
telephone carrier system (Americus, Georgia) on October 4 1955.
2
CHAPTER 3
First generation solar cells are the larger, silicon-based photovoltaic cells.
Silicon‘s ability to remain a semiconductor at higher temperatures has made it a
highly attractive raw material for solar panels. Silicon‘s abundance, however, does not
ease the challenges of harvesting and processing it into a usable material for
microchips and silicon panels. Solar cells, use silicon wafers consisting of Silicon or
Germanium that are doped with Phosphorus and Boron in a pn-junction. Silicon cells
have a quite high efficiency, but very pure silicon is needed, and due to the energy-
requiring process, the price is high compared to the power output. Crystalline Silicon
Solar Cells dominate 80-90% of solar cell market due to their high efficiency, despite
their high manufacturing costs
Second generation solar cell, also known as thin-film solar cell (TFSC) or
thin-film photovoltaic cell (TFPV), is made by depositing one or more thin layers
(thin films) of photovoltaic material on a substrate. They are significantly cheaper to
produce than first generation cells but have lower efficiencies. The great advantage of
thin-film solar cells, along with low cost, is their flexibility and versatility to be used
in varied environments. This has led to aesthetically pleasing solar innovations such
as solar shingles, solar glass and solar panels that can be rolled out onto a roof or
other surface. The most successful second generation materials have been cadmium
telluride (CdTe), copper indium gallium selenide(CIGS), amorphous silicon and
micro amorphous silicon. The thickness range of such a layer is wide and varies from
a few nanometers to tens of micrometers. These materials are applied in a thin film to
a supporting substrate such as glass or ceramics reducing material mass and therefore
costs. It is predicted that second generation cells will dominate the residential solar
market.
3
3.3 Third Genaration: Dye-Sensitized Solar Cell Technology:
The electrochemical dye solar cell was invented in 1988 by Professor Graetzel
of Lausanne Polytechnique, in Switzerland. The ―Graetzel‖ dye cell uses dye
molecules adsorbed in nanocrystalline oxide semiconductors, such as TiO2, to collect
sunlight. Dye cells employ relatively inexpensive materials such as glass, Titania
powder, and carbon powder. Graetzel‘s cell is composed of a porous layer of titanium
dioxide nanoparticles, covered with a molecular dye that absorbs sunlight, like the
chlorophyll does in green leaves. Third generation solar cells are the cutting edge of
solar technology. These solar cells can exceed the theoretical solar conversion
efficiency limit for a single energy threshold material.
4
CHAPTER 4
WORKING OF SOLARCELL
How do Solar Cells Work?
Solar cells, which largely are made from crystalline silicon work on the
principle of Photoelectric Effect that this semiconductor exhibits. Silicon in its purest
form- Intrinsic Silicon- is doped with a dopant impurity to yield Extrinsic Silicon of
desired characteristic (p- type or n-type Silicon). Working of Solar cells can thus be
based on crystalline structure of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Silicon. When p and n type
silicon combine they result in formation of potential barrier. These and more are
discussed below.
Extrinsic silicon in a solar cell has added impurity atoms purposefully mixed
in with the silicon atoms, maybe one for every million silicon atoms. Phosphorous has
5
five electrons in its outer shell. It bonds with its silicon neighbor atoms having
valency of 4, but in a sense, the phosphorous has one electron that doesn‘t have
anyone to bond with. It doesn‘t form part of a bond, but there is a positive proton in
the phosphorous nucleus holding it in place. When energy is added to pure silicon, in
the form of heat, it causes a few electrons to break free of their bonds and leave their
atoms. A hole is left behind in each case. These electrons, called free carriers, then
wander randomly around the crystalline lattice looking for another hole to fall into
and carry an electrical current. In Phosphorous-doped Silicon, it takes a lot less
energy to knock loose one of ―extra‖ phosphorous electrons because they aren‘t tied
up in a bond with any neighboring atoms. As a result, most of these electrons break
free, and
Release a lot more free carriers than in pure silicon. The process of adding
impurities on purpose is called doping, and when doped with phosphorous, the
resulting silicon is called N- type (―n‖ for negative) because of the prevalence of free
electrons. N-type doped silicon is a much better conductor than pure silicon. The
other part of a typical solar cell is doped with the element boron, which has only three
electrons in its outer shell instead of four, to become P- type silicon. Instead of having
free electrons, P-type (―p‖ for positive) has free openings and carries the opposite
(positive) charge
6
Figure 4.2 Photoelectric effect
When light, in the form of photons, hits solar cell, its energy breaks apart
electron-hole pairs(Photoelectric effect). Each photon with enough energy will
normally free exactly one electron, resulting in a free hole as well. If this happens
close enough to the electric field, or if free electron and free hole happen to wander
into its range of influence, the field will send the electron to the N side and the hole to
the P side. This causes further disruption of electrical neutrality, and if an external
current path is provided, electrons will flow through the path to the P side to unite
with holes that the electric field sent there, doing work for us along the way. The
electron flow provides the current, and the cell‘s electric field causes a voltage.
Silicon is very shiny material, which can send photons bouncing away before
energizing the electrons, so an antireflective coating is applied to reduce those losses.
The final step is to install something that will protect the cell from the external
elements- often a glass cover plate. PV modules are generally made by connecting
several individual cells together to achieve useful levels of voltage and current, and
putting them in a sturdy frame complete with positive and negative terminals.
7
CHAPTER 5
The basic component of a solar cell is intrinsic silicon, which is not pure in its
natural state. To make solar cells, the raw materials—silicon dioxide of either
quartzite gravel or crushed quartz—are first placed into an electric arc furnace, where
a carbon arc is applied to release the oxygen. A Graphite and Thermal insulator trap
the heat and maintain the furnace at required temperature for gangue ( impurity) to
form a slag. The products are carbon dioxide and molten silicon. Silicon ingot is
pulled down from the molten silicon using seed silicon crystallization and floating
zone technique. Passing impure silicon in same direction several times that separates
impurities- and impure end is later removed. This process yields silicon with one
percent impurity, useful in many industries but not the solar cell industry. At this
point, the silicon is still not pure enough to be used for solor cells and requires further
purification. Pure silicon is derived from such silicon dioxides as quartzite gravel (the
purest silica) or crushed quartz.
8
STEP 2- INGOT AND WAFER PREPARATION
Solar cells are made from silicon boules, polycrystalline structures that have
the atomic structure of a single crystal. The most commonly used process for creating
the boule is called the Czochralski method. In this process, a seed crystal of silicon is
dipped into melted Polycrystalline silicon. As the seed crystal is withdrawn and
rotated, a cylindrical ingot or ―boule‖ of silicon is formed. The ingot withdrawn is
unusually pure, because impurities tend to remain in the liquid. From the boule,
silicon wafers are sliced one at a time using a circular saw whose inner diameter cuts
into the rod, or many at once with a multiwire saw. (A diamond saw produces cuts
that are as wide as the wafer—. 5 millimeter thick.) Only about one-half of the silicon
is lost from the boule to the finished circular wafer—more if the wafer is then cut to
be rectangular or hexagonal. Rectangular or hexagonal wafers are sometimes used in
solar cells because they can be fitted together perfectly, thereby utilizing all available
space on the front surface of the solar cell. The wafers are then polished to remove
saw marks.
STEP 3 – DOPING:
The traditional way of doping silicon wafers with boron and phosphorous is to
introduce a small amount of boron during the Czochralski process. The wafers are
then sealed back to back and placed in a furnace to be heated to slightly below the
melting point of silicon (2,570 degrees Fahrenheit or 1,410 degrees Celsius) in the
9
presence of phosphorous gas. The phosphorous atoms ―burrow‖ into the silicon,
which is more porous because it is close to becoming a liquid. The temperature and
time given to the process is carefully controlled to ensure a uniform junction of proper
depth. These diffusion processes are usually performed through the use of a batch
tube furnace or an in-line continuous furnace.The basic furnace construction and
process are very similar to the process steps used by packaging engineers.
Electrical contacts are formed through squeezing a metal paste through mesh
screens to create metal grid. This metal paste (usually Ag or Al) needs to be dried
so that subsequent layers can be screen-printed using the same method. As a last step,
the wafer is heated in a continuous firing furnace at temperatures ranging from 780 to
900°C. These grid- pattern metal screens act as collector electrodes that carry
electrons and complete the electrical continuity in the circuit.
Electrical contacts connect each solar cell to another and to the receiver of
produced current. The contacts must be very thin (at least in the front) so as not to
block sunlight to the cell.
10
Figure 5.3 Anti reflection coating
Until its molecules boil off and travel to the silicon and condense, or the
material undergoes sputtering. In this process, a high voltage knocks molecules off the
material and deposits them onto the silicon at the opposite electrode. Yet another
method is to allow the silicon itself to react with oxygen- or nitrogen-containing gases
to form silicon dioxide or silicon nitride. Commercial solar cell manufacturers use
silicon nitride. Another method to make silicon absorb more light is to make its top
surface grained, i.e. pyramid shaped nanostructures that yield 70% absorption that
reaches the cell surface after passing through anti-reflective coating.
The finished solar cells are then encapsulated; that is, sealed into silicon
rubber or ethylene vinyl acetate. Solar module assembly usually involves soldering
cells together to produce a 36-cell string (or longer) and laminating it between
toughened glass on the top and a polymeric backing sheet on the bottom. The
encapsulated solar cells are then placed into an aluminum frame that has a mylar or
tedlarbacksheet and a glass or plastic cover. Frames are usually applied to allow for
mounting in the field, or the laminates may be separately integrated into a mounting
system for a specific application such as integration into a building.
11
CHAPTER 6
ÀPPLICATIONS OF SOLARCELL
12
climates ideally suited to PV applications. Even in Europe, several hundred thousand
houses in permanent occupation (and yet more holiday homes) do not have access to
grid electricity.
Water pumping:
Health care:
Lighting:
13
Figure 6.1 Solar Lighting
Professional applications:
Many lighthouses and most buoys are now powered by solar cells.
Telecommunication systems:
Scientific research stations, seismic recording, weather stations, etc. Use very
little power which, in combination with a dependable battery, is provided reliably by a
small PV module.
Cathodic protection:
14
6.2 Electric power generation in space:
Photovoltaic solar generators have been and will remain the best choice for
providing electrical power to satellites in an orbit around the Earth. Indeed, the use of
solar cells on the U.S. satellite Vanguard I in 1958 demonstrated beyond doubt the
first practical application of photovoltaics. Since then, the satellite power
requirements have evolved from few Watts to several kiloWatts, with arrays
approaching 100 kW being planned for a future space station.
Grid-connected systems:
PV Power Stations:
A PV power station feeds the generated power instantaneously into the utility
distribution network (the ‗grid‘) by means of one or more inverters and transformers.
The first PV power station was built at Hysperia in southern California in 1982 with
nominal power specification 1 MW, using crystalline silicon modules mounted on a 2
axis tracking system.
15
PV in buildings:
The main advantages of these distributed systems over large PV plants are as
follows:
The transmission losses are much lower because the load is on the same site as
the supply.
The value of the PV electricity is also higher because it is equal to the selling
price of the grid electricity which has been replaced, rather that to the cost of
generating it.
However, it should also be noted that the price paid by utility companies for
electricity exported from a decentralised source is a fraction of the utility sale price.
The optimum economic benefit is therefore derived by consuming all PV produced
electricity, with direct reduction of the energy imported from the utility. Thus grid
connected PV systems are ideal for loads which vary in proportion to the irradiation.
Typical loads are air-conditioning, refrigeration and pumping. Other significant loads
can be timed to operate when PV power is likely to be available.
16
CHAPTER 7
EFFICIENCY OF SOLARCELL
Efficiency of Solar Cell:
Solar efficiency refers to the amount of ambient light that can be converted
into usable electricity. There are two ways to evaluate photovoltaic solar efficiency:
You can look at solar cell efficiency or at solar panel efficiency. Solar cellefficiency
is the amount of light that the individual solar cell converts to electricity. Solar cells
are placed next to one another on top of a backsheet and are covered by glass to make
up a solar panel.
Solar panel efficiency refers to the amount of light that the entire module
converts to electricity. The efficiency of a solar panel is lower than that of a solar cell
due to the spacing between cells and because the glass covering reflects away some of
the sunlight.
Consequently, you want to pay attention to solar panel efficiency because that
will indicate how much electricity your solar energy system will actually generate.
High efficiency solar panels help you to maximize your overall return on
investment for today and the future. These solar panels will:
Generate more electricity with fewer panels Require less rooftop space
Involve reduced installation time and fewer mounting materials Offer more
long-term savings
Efficiency Improvement:
Solar power is big. It‘s so big, in fact, that the Department of Energy recently
promised up to$7 million in funding to support emerging solar technologies [source:
DOE]. Harnessing the sun‘s energy is smart, but not as simple as it sounds.
It might be easier if we really could ―harness‖ the sun, but that bright spot in
the sky is elusive. Sometimes it hides behind clouds and, each night, it disappears
altogether for hours at a time. The optimal time to mine the sun‘s energy is when it is
highest in the sky, typically during the summer months when we also enjoy longer
17
days with more average sunshine.
The researchers and engineers who design and build solar panels have to work
with and around these factors all while devising new ways to not only collect but
reserve free and renewable energy from the sun. For example, using mirrors, they‘ve
figured out a way to direct sunlight to solar panels even when the sun moves at an
angle that normally would keep it from hitting those very panels.
On the next few pages, discover how innovative people are coming up with
ways to use one of our most traditional energy sources more efficiently and
effectively. You‘ll learn more about how solar panels can track the sun, how using
different building materials increases efficiency and how solar concentrators channel
light waves. Finally, you‘ll learn how ―the sky‘s no limit‖ when it comes to collecting
the sun‘s power for use here on Earth.
The cost of a solar cell is given per unit of peak electrical power. Solar-
specific feed-in tariffs vary worldwide, and even state by state within various
countries. Such feed-in tariffscan be highly effective in encouraging the development
of solar power projects. High-efficiency solar cells are of interest to decrease the cost
of solar energy. Many of the costs of a solar power plant are proportional to the panel
area or land area of the plant. A higher efficiency cell may reduce the required areas
and so reduce the total plant cost, even if the cells themselves are more costly.
Efficiencies of bare cells, to be useful in evaluating solar power plant economics,
must be evaluated under realistic conditions. The basic parameters that need to be
evaluated are the short circuit current, open circuit voltage.
The chart above illustrates the best laboratory efficiencies obtained for various
materials and technologies, generally this is done on very small, i.e., one square cm,
cells. Commercial efficiencies are significantly lower. Grid parity, the point at which
photovoltaic electricity is equal to or cheaper than grid power, can be reached using
low cost solar cells. Proponents of solar hope to achieve grid parity first in areas with
abundant sun and high costs for electricity such as in California and Japan.Some
argue that grid parity has been reached in Hawaii and other islands that otherwise use
diesel fuel to produce electricity. George W. Bush had set 2015 as the date for grid
parity in the USA. Speaking at a conference in 2007, General Electric‘s Chief
18
Engineer predicted grid parity without subsidies in sunny parts of the United States by
around 2015.
The price of solar panels fell steadily for 40 years, until 2004 when high
subsidies in Germany drastically increased demand there and greatly increased the
price of purified silicon (which is used in computer chips as well as solar panels). The
recession of 2008 and the onset of Chinese manufacturing caused prices to resume
their decline with vehemence. In the four years after January 2008 prices for solar
modules in Germany dropped from €3 to €1 per peak watt. During that same times
production capacity surged with an annual growth of more than 50%. China increased
market share from 8% in 2008 to over 55% in the last quarter of 2010. Recently, in
December 2012 the price of Chinese solar panels had dropped to $0.60/Wp
(crystalline modules).
Swanson‘s law, an observation similar to Moore‘s Law that states that solar
cell prices fall 20% for every doubling of industry capacity, has gained recent (as of
2012) media attention, having been featured in an article in the British weekly
newspaper The Economist.
However, some solar cells are optimized for light absorption beyond Earth‘s
atmosphere as well. Light absorbing materials can often be used in multiple physical
configurations to take advantage of different light absorption and charge separation
mechanisms.
Many currently available solar cells are made from bulk materials that are
cutInto wafers between 180 to 240 micrometers thick that are then processed like
other semiconductors.
19
Other materials are made as thin-films layers, organic dyes, and organic
polymers that are deposited on supporting substrates. A third group are made from
nanocrystals and used as quantum dots (electron-confined nanoparticles). Silicon
remains the only material that is well-researched in both bulk and thin-film forms.
Crystalline silicon:
By far, the most prevalent bulk material for solar cells is crystalline silicon
(abbreviated as a group as c-Si), also known as ―solar grade silicon‖. Bulk silicon is
separated into multiple categories according to crystallinity and crystal size in the
resulting ingot, ribbon, or wafer.
20
companies build additional polysilicon capacity quicker than the industry‘s projected
demand. On the other hand, the cost of producing upgraded metallurgical-grade
silicon, also known as UMG Si, can potentially be one-sixth that of making
polysilicon. Manufacturers of wafer-based cells have responded to high silicon prices
in 2004–2008 prices with rapid reductions in silicon consumption. According to Jef
Poortmans, director of IMEC‘s organic and solar department, current cells use
between eight and nine grams of silicon per watt of power generation, with wafer
thicknesses in the neighborhood of 0.200 mm. At 2008 spring‘s IEEE Photovoltaic
Specialists‘ Conference (PVS‘08), John Wohlgemuth, staff scientist at BP Solar,
reported that his company has qualified modules based on 0.180 mm thick wafers and
is testing processes for 0.16 mm wafers cut with 0.1 mm wire. IMEC‘s road map,
presented at the organization‘s recent annual research review meeting, envisions use
of 0.08 mm wafers by 2015.
Thin films:
21
reported that the lowest quoted thin-film module price stands at US$0.84 per watt-
peak, with the lowest crystalline silicon (c-Si) module at $1.06 per watt-peak.
The cadmium present in the cells would be toxic if released. However, release
is impossible during normal operation of the cells and is unlikely during fires in
residential roofs. A square meter of CdTe contains approximately the same amount of
Cd as a single C cell Nickel- cadmium battery, in a more stable and less soluble form.
Copper indium gallium selenide (CIGS) is a direct band gap material. It has
the highest efficiency (~20%) among thin film materials (see CIGS solar cell).
Traditional methods of fabrication involve vacuum processes including co-
evaporation and sputtering. Recent developments at IBM and Nanosolar attempt to
lower the cost by using non-vacuum solution processes.
GaAs based multijunction devices are the most efficient solar cells to date. In
October 15, 2012, triple junction metamorphic cell reached a record high of
44%.Tandem solar cells based on monolithic, series connected, gallium indium
phosphide (GaInP), gallium arsenide GaAs, and germanium Ge p–n junctions, are
seeing demand rapidly rise. Between December 2006 and December 2007, the cost of
4N gallium metal rose from about $350 per kg to $680 per kg. Additionally,
germanium metal prices have risen substantially to $1000–1200 per kg this year.
22
Those materials include gallium (4N, 6N and 7N Ga), arsenic (4N, 6N and 7N) and
germanium, pyrolitic boron nitride (pBN) crucibles for growing crystals, and boron
oxide, these products are critical to the entire substrate manufacturing industry.
Triple-junction Gas solar cells were also being used as the power source of the
Dutch four- time World Solar Challenge winners Nuna in 2003, 2005 and 2007, and
also by the Dutch solar cars Solutra (2005), Twente One (2007) and 21Revolution
(2009).
The Dutch Radboud University Nijmegen set the record for thin film solar cell
efficiency using a single junction GaAs to 25.8% in August 2008 using only 4 µm
thick GaAs layer which can be transferred from a wafer base to glass or plastic film.
23
from G24i Innovations.
Quantum dot solar cells (QDSCs) are based on the Gratzel cell, or dye-
sensitized solar cell, architecture but employ low band gap semiconductor
nanoparticles, fabricated with such small crystallite sizes that they form quantum dots
(such as CdS, CdSe, Sb2S3, PbS, etc.), instead of organic or organometallic dyes as
light absorbers. Quantum dots (QDs) have attracted much interest because of their
unique properties. Their size quantization allows for the band gap to be tuned by
simply changing particle size. They also have high extinction coefficients, and have
shown the possibility of multiple exciton generation.
Organic solar cells are a relatively novel technology, yet hold the promise of a
substantial price reduction (over thin-film silicon) and a faster return on investment.
These cells can be processed from solution, hence the possibility of a simple roll-to-
roll printing process, leading to inexpensive, large scale production.
Organic solar cells and polymer solar cells are built from thin films (typically
100 nm)of organic semiconductors including polymers, such as
polyphenylenevinylene and small- molecule compounds like copper phthalocyanine
(a blue or green organic pigment)and carbon fullerenes and fullerene derivatives such
as PCBM. Energy conversion efficiencies achieved to date using conductive polymers
24
are low compared to inorganic materials. However, it has improved quickly in the last
few years and the
These devices differ from inorganic semiconductor solar cells in that they do
not rely on the large built-in electric field of a PN junction to separate the electrons
and holes created when photons are absorbed. The active region of an organic device
consists of two materials, one which acts as an electron donor and the other as an
acceptor. When a photon is converted into an electron hole pair, typically in the donor
material, the charges tend to remain bound in the form of an exciton, and are
separated when the exciton diffuses to the donor-acceptor interface. The short exciton
diffusion lengths of most polymer systems tend to limit the efficiency of such devices.
Nanostructured interfaces, sometimes in the form of bulk heterojunctions, can
improve performance.
25
protocrystalline silicon with a low volume fraction of nanocrystalline silicon is
optimal for high open circuit voltage. These types of silicon present dangling and
twisted bonds, which results in deep defects (energy levels in the bandgap) as well as
deformation of the valence and conduction bands (band tails). The solar cells made
from these materials tend to have lower energy conversion efficiency than bulk
silicon, but are also less expensive to produce. The quantum efficiency of thin film
solar cells is also lower due to reduced number of collected charge carriers per
incident photon.
Amorphous silicon has a higher bandgap (1.7 eV) than crystalline silicon (c-
Si) (1.1 eV), which means it absorbs the visible part of the solar spectrum more
strongly than theinfrared portion of the spectrum. As nc-Si has about the same
26
bandgap as c-Si, the nc-Si and a-Si can advantageously be combined in thin layers,
creating a layered cell called Atandem cell. The top cell in a-Si absorbs the visible
light and leaves the infrared part of the spectrum for the bottom cell in nc-
Si.Recently, solutions to overcome the limitations of thin-film crystalline silicon have
been developed. Light trapping schemes where the weakly absorbed long wavelength
light is obliquely coupled into the silicon and traverses the film several times can
significantly enhance the absorption of sunlight in the thin silicon films. Minimizing
the top contact coverage of the cell surface is another method for reducing optical
losses; this approach simply aims at reducing the area that is covered over the cell to
allow for maximum light input into the cell. Anti-reflective coatings can also be
applied to create destructive interference within the cell. This can be done by
modulating the Refractive index of the surface coating; if destructive interference is
achieved, there will be no reflective wave and thus all light will be transmitted into
the semiconductor cell. Surface texturing is another option, but may be less viable
because it also increases the manufacturing price. By applying a texture to the surface
of the solar cell, the reflected light can be refracted into striking the surface again,
thus reducing the overall light reflected out.
27
When not to do put in a Photovoltaic System:
We believe that solar photovoltaic systems can be a great energy solution for
most homeowners. However, they are not the best solution for every homeowner. In
talking to experienced solar contractors they estimate that about 15% of homes are not
a good fit for a solar PV system. There are a number of scenarios where PV systems
are impractical or where other uses of your money would get better results. In order to
make a good determination you need to look at both energy generation and energy
conservation.
Here is a list of scenarios where we think putting in a PV system would be ill advised:
Poor Insulation – Many homeowners have homes that are under insulated.
There is no point in creating energy using solar panels only to have that very same
energy go out through your roof and be wasted. Energy conservation should always
come before energy generation so take care of your home‘s insulation first before you
spend any money on a PV system. Once your home is properly insulated and if you
have money left over then you can consider a PV system. Also, it is worth noting that
increasingly many states will insist that your home be properly insulated before they
will provide rebates for photovoltaic systems.
Old Roof – Also, if your insulation is good but your roof is on its last legs you
probably should consider getting the roof done first so there is a good foundation for
the solar panels. If you try to wait a few years and then do your roof then you are
going to have to remove all of the solar panels first which can add unnecessary cost.
Unavoidable Shade – Solar panels are very durable devices but their
performance drops significantly if all or even part of the panel is exposed to direct
shade for any length of time. A competent solar contractor can analyze the location
where you are thinking of putting your panels using a device called a solar Pathfinder
and can tell you what the impact of shade from trees or other buildings might have. If
trees are the problem you have the option to remove them. However, sometimes the
trees are on a neighbors property and removing them may be more difficult. If you are
in an urban area and shade is being caused by another building the problem is a good
bit harder. Some states have begun enforcing the right of one homeowner not to shade
out another homeowner‘s PV system (a right to light so to speak) so there is some
chance you can take legal action to remove whatever is shading your property.
28
However, these types of lawsuits are relatively new and it might end up being more
hassle than it is worth. Consider using a pole mounted system for holding your solar
panels or consider putting the panels on your garage instead of your house. If these
are not options then solar PV might not be the best solution for you.
The Payback is Too Long – For some homeowners the payback period for
solar energy may be too long. This is particularly true in those states that do not
provide any incentives for solar energy. If you are not sure if your state provides
incentives check out the database at www.dsireusa.org and you can see what
incentives they offer. When all is said and done any investment should make good
economic Sense. Solar has its positives and negatives as an investment. On the
negative side is the fact that the current administration is in the process of letting the
$3000 federal solar incentive lapse. However, there is a chance this will either get
overturned or brought back by the next administration. On the positive side of the
equation there is the fact that both electric rates and home heating fuel costs are going
up rapidly which shortens the payback period for solar. Any payback analysis should
include some adjustment for the likelihood the energy rates will continue to rise.
Since solar panels last a very long time (25-30 years at minimum) the question is how
much will they rise. Most estimates we have seen suggest factoring in an annual rise
in energy costs of 6% a year is appropriate in a payback analysis but given the recent
dramatic rises in the cost of electricity in the last few years you may want to go with a
higher inflation factor.
29
with a solar thermal system rather than a PV system. Solar thermal systems cost far
less than a full-sized PV system and can still provide very significant energySavings.
Most cost between $4000 to $6000 and can pay for themselves in just 3-5 years.
You Are Planning to Move – This one is just a bit tougher to judge. The
question is, if you are only planning on being in your home a short time will you get a
good return on an investment in a PV system. In other words will the increase in your
sales price be equal to or greater than what you spent on the system. Many experts
believe that adding a photovoltaic system to a home will immediately result in a
significant increase in home value. However, we have heard other real estate experts
tell us that given the current down real estate market the investment in a solar energy
system is not completely recoverable in a short time frame. Many of the areas where
this appears to be the case, such as Florida and California, are going through one of
the worst housing markets in the last 50 years. If you are thinking of moving soon
after installing a solar system you might want to discuss the resale value with real
estateagents in your local area. House prices are a local phenomenon and what might
be a good investment in solar in one area might be a bad investment in another.
30
CONCLUSION
After the extensive investigation, we found that the performance of the solar
cell is not only affected by the nature of the solvent and the electrolyte, but also the
particle size of the semi-conductor and the nature of the dye. When we use 0.5ml
dichloromethane as the solvent with 2 drops of ethanoic acid, the maximum current
achieved was 2.85mA under sunlight. Our results were 3 times better than that using
the conditions recommended in the literature. Actually, conserving the world is one of
the people‘s responsibilities and so we hope that this dye sensitized solar cell will be
widely used soon so as to provide another clean and cheap energy source.
31
REFERANCES
http://www.explainthatstuff.com/solarcells.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_cell
http://www.specmat.com/Overview%20of%20Solar%20Cells.htm
32