Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Switch Stacking12

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 1

CRE https://cloudplayer.bravais.com/preview?p=kRTsMajAj4PrGZy5Sgp1gf6f0DZsjMMOZqafYdE3WuU1pJ/QtvWRcWp4TsLhlQpgVT+sJV8fG...

Comparing Switch Stacking to Other Technologies


This table compares the switch stacking feature to LAG and VLT technology.

Feature Description Bene�ts Drawbacks Topology diagram

• Overcomes limitations of Spanning


Tree Protocol (STP) by eliminating
Link Aggregation Group: the need to block interfaces
Implemented with Link Aggregation Control • Increases bandwidth utilization
Protocol—LACP —balances tra�c across all member
LAG links Peer-to-peer only
Combines links between two switches into • Increased availability—If one
single logical link. member fails, the remaining
members in the LAG continue to
carry tra�c

• Higher resiliency with dual control


plane
• Gives link redundancy - both VLT
links are active, but do not form a
Virtual Link Trunking: loop
Multichassis Link Aggregation where • Optimal bandwidth utilization
VLT Limited to 2 peers
downstream devices build port channels to a
• Automatic failover if there is failure
single logical chassis
• Switches operate as independent
L2/L3 switches
• Maintenance on one switch without
taking down the entire fabric

• Single Control Plane


• Simpli�es management Maintenance “lights
• Provides resiliency – automatic out” required – a
Virtual chassis – multiple physical switches failover reboot is needed after
Stacking
make up one virtual switch. �rmware upgrade
• Supports multiple topologies takes down entire
• Supports two or more chassis fabric.
(up to 12 with some Dell switches)

1 de 1 27/10/2022, 12:20

You might also like