Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 17 views

    Critique Lesson Plan Exercise

    Uploaded by

    Sucely Galdamez
    This critique evaluates a poor sample Spanish lesson plan submitted by a student. The critique finds weaknesses in most areas of the lesson plan, including a lack of identifying information, unclear and immeasurable objectives, concepts and performances that are not aligned to the topic, and activities that do not reinforce the concepts or engage students. Recommendations are made to address the weaknesses by adding identifying details, writing clear and measurable objectives aligned to the topic, and including interactive activities that apply the concepts.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Critique Lesson Plan Exercise

    Uploaded by

    Sucely Galdamez
    17 views4 pages
    This critique evaluates a poor sample Spanish lesson plan submitted by a student. The critique finds weaknesses in most areas of the lesson plan, including a lack of identifying information, unclear and immeasurable objectives, concepts and performances that are not aligned to the topic, and activities that do not reinforce the concepts or engage students. Recommendations are made to address the weaknesses by adding identifying details, writing clear and measurable objectives aligned to the topic, and including interactive activities that apply the concepts.

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This critique evaluates a poor sample Spanish lesson plan submitted by a student. The critique finds weaknesses in most areas of the lesson plan, including a lack of identifying information, unclear and immeasurable objectives, concepts and performances that are not aligned to the topic, and activities that do not reinforce the concepts or engage students. Recommendations are made to address the weaknesses by adding identifying details, writing clear and measurable objectives aligned to the topic, and including interactive activities that apply the concepts.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    17 views4 pages

    Critique Lesson Plan Exercise

    Uploaded by

    Sucely Galdamez
    This critique evaluates a poor sample Spanish lesson plan submitted by a student. The critique finds weaknesses in most areas of the lesson plan, including a lack of identifying information, unclear and immeasurable objectives, concepts and performances that are not aligned to the topic, and activities that do not reinforce the concepts or engage students. Recommendations are made to address the weaknesses by adding identifying details, writing clear and measurable objectives aligned to the topic, and including interactive activities that apply the concepts.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 4

    EDUC3905OS1 FIELD EXPERIENCE 2022.

    2
    CRITIQUE OF LESSON PLANS

    GROUP NAME: Spanish

    GROUP MEMBERS: Alfredo Acosta, Sucely Galdamez

    This exercise is designed to give you practice with lesson planning within your curriculum group.
    Complete the exercise as a group and within this Google Document.
    a. Use the criteria listed below to assess the POOR lesson plans that you have been given.
    b. Evaluate each lesson plan, stating the strengths and weaknesses of the plan.
    c. Make recommendations to improve the cited weaknesses.

    CRITERIA COMMENTS

    1. The plan has clear identifying information: e.g. No teachers name, no date, no class
    Date; Name of Teacher; School; Class; Time.

    2. The sub-topic is linked/aligned to the topic. Does not link/align with the topic
    3. The previous knowledge is stated using observable and Not measurable, not observable. It’s too vague
    measurable terms.
    4. The Content Standard is clearly identified and No content standard
    referenced.

    5. The Learning Outcome is clearly stated and referenced. Not stated

    6. Objective: The condition is relevant and can facilitate Not relevant, unclear
    achievement of performances.

    7. Objective: The verbs in the performances are observable Not observable, nor measurable
    and measurable.

    8. Objective: Each verb in the performance represents It’s not meaningful and irrelevant
    meaningful and relevant learning experiences and
    outcomes.

    9. Objective: The performances are aligned to the sub-topic Not aligned


    and concept(s).

    10. Objective: The performances reflect higher order No cognitive domain stated
    thinking. The levels in the cognitive domain are stated.

    11. Concept Statement: The concept(s) is/are clearly stated Not clearly stated. No exmples
    and supported with examples. The concept(s) to be
    taught is/are suitable for the duration of the lesson.

    12. Concept Statement: The concept statement(s) is/are


    aligned to the sub-topic.

    13. Concept Statement: There are clear links between the


    concept statement and the performances in the

    EDUC39051O1 FIELD EXPERIENCE 2022.2: Exercise: Lesson Plan Critique


    objective.

    14. References: Two texts and accurate page number(s) are


    identified or one text and page number(s) and appropriate
    “URL" are noted. (APA7 format)

    15. Skills and Attitude: The three skills phrases are clearly
    stated and applicable. The statement of attitude is aligned
    to the sub-topic and the concept(s).

    16. Linkages: Two areas of study and related sub-topics


    identified.
    For e.g. Math (Odd Numbers), Science (Living Things).

    17. Introduction: The lesson introduction is strongly linked


    to the previous knowledge.
    18. Introduction: The lesson introduction is motivating and
    suitable for the level of students.

    19. Introduction: Relevant resources are accurately used in


    the lesson introduction.

    20. Development: There is transition from the lesson


    introduction to the lesson development.

    21. Development: There are efforts to teach or guide


    students to “understand” or apply the concept(s).

    22. Development: There are efforts to meaningfully engage


    students as the teacher guides students to “understand” or
    apply the concept(s).

    23. Development: The performances in the objective (at least


    two) are reflected in the lesson development.

    24. Development: The use of a variety of Collaborative


    Strategies.

    25. Development: Student(s) to student(s) and teacher to


    student interactions are evident in chosen activities.

    26. Development: The resources are appropriately utilized


    during the lesson.

    27. Development (Closure): At the end of the development,


    efforts are made to review/summarize the concept(s).

    28. Conclusion: The activity or reinforcement in the lesson


    conclusion reinforces the concept (s ji) and can be linked
    to one or more performances in the objective.

    29. Conclusion: Efforts are made to assess students using


    authentic forms of assessment that reflect the stated
    objectives.

    EDUC39051O1 FIELD EXPERIENCE 2022.2: Exercise: Lesson Plan Critique


    30. Extended Activity: The extended activity is meaningful.
    It promotes critical thinking and opportunities for
    application in real life settings.

    EDUC39051O1 FIELD EXPERIENCE 2022.2: Exercise: Lesson Plan Critique


    POOR SAMPLE LESSON PLAN
    LANGUAGE [ENGLISH & SPANISH]

    Student L submitted the lesson plan below for grading. Your task is to evaluate the plan.
    a. Use the criteria listed below to assess the POOR lesson plans that you have been given.
    b. Evaluate the lesson plan, stating the strengths and weaknesses of the plan.
    c. Make recommendations to improve the cited weaknesses.

    Topic: The Nature of Languages


    Sub-topic: Stakeholders
    Time: Wednesday, 9:30 a.m.- 10:45 p.m.
    References:
    CXC CSEC Syllabus
    Previous Knowledge: Students can read. k..,k f4

    Objectives: Students will be able to:


    identify effective use of adjectives, word combinations, unusual turn of a phrase.
    Concepts:
    o Language is important
    Skills:
    ● Write a sentence using adjectives
    Attitudes:
    ● Respect the opinion of others
    Materials:
    ● Textbook
    Linkages:
    Introduction:
    ● Teacher will ask students to take out the text and read p. 95 with a partner
    Development:

    ● Teacher will explain the concept of syntax – the ways in which words are ordered and connected to
    form phrases or sentences with particular meaning

    ● Students will read text and discuss stakeholders.


    Closure:
    ● Teacher will give a 20-item multiple choice from a past CXC paper
    Conclusion:

    Extended Activity:
    Students will complete the exercises on p. 20 of the text for homework.

    EDUC39051O1 FIELD EXPERIENCE 2022.2: Exercise: Lesson Plan Critique

    You might also like