Python Project Synopsis
Python Project Synopsis
Python Project Synopsis
INTRODUCTION
Hydrogen is the chemical element with the
symbol H and atomic number 1. Hydrogen is the
lightest element. At standard conditions hydrogen
is a gas of diatomic molecules having the formula
H2. It is colorless, odorless, tasteless,[8] non-
toxic, and highly combustible. Hydrogen is the
most abundant chemical substance in the universe,
constituting roughly 75% of all normal matter.
The hydrogen atom has a nucleus consisting of a
proton bearing one unit of positive electrical
charge; an electron, bearing one unit of negative
electrical charge, is also associated with this
nucleus. Under ordinary conditions, hydrogen gas
is a loose aggregation of hydrogen molecules, each
consisting of a pair of atoms, a diatomic molecule,
H2. The earliest known important chemical
property of hydrogen is that it burns with oxygen
to form water, H2O; indeed, the name hydrogen is
derived from Greek words meaning “maker of
water”.
Hydrogen can be produced from a variety of
feedstock's. These include fossil resources, such as
natural gas and coal, as well as renewable
resources, such as biomass and water with input
from renewable energy sources (e.g. sunlight,
wind, wave or hydro-power). A variety of process
technologies can be used, including chemical,
biological, electrolytic, photolytic and thermo-
chemical. Each technology is in a different stage
of development, and each offers unique
opportunities, benefits and challenges. Local
availability of feedstock, the maturity of the
technology, market applications and demand,
policy issues, and costs will all influence the
choice and timing of the various options for
hydrogen production
An overview of the various feed stocks and
process technologies is presented in Figure 1.
Future
H2O + potential
electricitycosts
➞ H2 for+ electrolytic
1 /2O2 (3.1)hydrogen are
presented in Figure 3,
Alkaline electrolysis
Alkaline electrolysers use an aqueous KOH
solution (caustic) as an electrolyte that usually
circulates through the electrolytic cells. Alkaline
electrolysers are suited for stationary applications
and are available at operating pressures up to 25
bar. Alkaline electrolysis is a mature technology,
with a significant operating record in industrial
applications, that allows remote operation. The
following reactions take place inside the alkaline
electrolysis cell:
Electrolyte: 4H2O ➞ 4H+ + 4OH– (3.1)
Cathode: 4 H+ + 4e– ➞ 2H2 (3.2)
Anode: 4OH– ➞ O2 + 2H2O + 4e– (3.3)
Sum: 2H2O ➞ O2 + 2H2 (3.4)
Commercial electrolysers usually consist of a
number of electrolytic cells arranged in a cell
stack. Alkaline electrolysers typically contain the
main components shown in Figure 4. The major R
challenge for the future is to design and
manufacture electrolyser equipment at lower costs
with higher energy efficiency and larger turn-down
ratios.
Ph
oto-electrolysis (photolysis)
Photovoltaic (PV) systems coupled to electrolysers
are commercially available. The systems offer
some flexibility, as the output can be electricity
from photovoltaic cells or hydrogen from the
electrolyser.
Direct photo-electrolysis represents an advanced
alternative to a PV-electrolysis system by
combining both processes in a single apparatus.
This principle is illustrated in Figure 5.
Photoelectrolysis of water is the process whereby
light is used to split water directly into hydrogen
and oxygen. Such systems offer great potential for
cost reduction of electrolytic hydrogen, compared
with conventional two-step technologies.
CENTRALISED HYDROGEN
PRODUCTION
Large-scale, industrial hydrogen production from
all fossil energy sources can be considered a
commercial technology for industrial purposes,
though not yet for utilities. Hydrogen production at
a large scale has the potential for relatively low
unit costs, although the hydrogen production cost
from natural gas in medium sized plants may be
reduced towards the cost of large-scale production.
An important challenge is to decarbonise the
hydrogen production process. CO2 capture and
storage options are not fully technically and
commercially proven. They require R on
absorption or separation processes and process
line-up, as well as acceptance for CO2 storage. It
is also important to increase plant efficiency,
reduce capital costs and enhance reliability and
operating flexibility. A principle sketch of
hydrogen distribution from a natural gas-based
centralised hydrogen production plant is presented
in figure 9
DISTRIBUTED HYDROGEN
PRODUCTION
Distributed hydrogen production can be based on
both water electrolysis and the natural gas
processes discussed above. The benefit would be a
reduced need for the transportation of hydrogen
fuel, and hence less need for the construction of a
new hydrogen infrastructure. Distributed
production would also utilise existing
infrastructure, such as natural gas or water and
electric power. However, the production costs are
higher for the smaller-capacity production
facilities, and the efficiencies of production will
probably be lower than those of centralised plants.
In addition, carbon capture and sequestration
would be more difficult and costly in small fossil-
fuelled plants. Also, it is unlikely that CO2 from
fossil fuels will be captured and stored when
hydrogen is produced from distributed reformers.
The R needs for distributed hydrogen production
are summarised in Table 2. Small-scale reformers
will enable the use of existing natural gas pipelines
for the production of hydrogen at the site of the
consumer. Such reformers therefore represent an
important technology for the transition to a larger
hydrogen supply. The availability of commercial
reformers is limited and most reformers are
currently in an R stage. Further development and
R is essential to meet customer requirements.
Some of theses gaps are challenging and require
more effort by the technology developers and
suppliers. The technology achievements in the last
three years have been remarkable and the
technology gaps have been reduced significantly.
Compactness (i.e. footprint and height) is an 18
especially important market requirement.
Suppliers have significantly reduced the footprint
and height. The optimum system for the future
would be an underground system that requires a
space of 10 × 3 × 3 meters for a capacity of 500 –
700 Nm3/hour. The target is within reach with
some additional R effort. However, the space
required by hydrogen production is a disadvantage
for the technology when compared with
conventional trucked-in systems for
gasoline/diesel or hydrogen. Minimising footprint
and visibility has been an important R priority.
Also, codes and standards for hydrogen production
and storage will need to be revised to permit the
use of enclosed or underground spaces, at least in
some countries.
CONCLUSION AND
RECCOMENDATION
In conclusion, hydrogen is a highly promising
energy carrier and fuel for stationary and
transportation uses, but the potential expanded use
of hydrogen involves many technical and
infrastructure-related challenges. Approximately
10-11 million metric tonnes of hydrogen are used
each year in the US, but mostly in internal
industrial settings. Delivering this hydrogen to
smaller merchant end-uses, such as small (<1 to 5
MW) fuel-cell power plants or hydrogen refueling
stations is likely to be challenging. This is now
being done in certain places, but for smaller-scale
applications it is more common for hydrogen to be
made onsite from either natural gas or electricity.
In addition to the more conventional methods of
SMR, gasification, and grid-powered electrolysis,
a new suite of renewable production options is
emerging. These include using renewable power
directly for electrolysis, various biogas conversion
options, and newly developed photo-
electrochemical and thermo-chemical processes.
Also being investigated are use of tailored
molecules that can facilitate the splitting of water
molecules into hydrogen and oxygen with lower
energy requirements than conventional
electrolysis, and a range of biological and algae-
based methods.
Gaseous H2 Storage:
Status: Commercially available, but costly.
Best option: C-fibre composite vessels (6-10 wt%
H2 at 350-700 bar).
Issues: Fracture mechanics, safety, compression
energy, and reduction of volume.
Liquid H2 Storage:
Status: Commercially available, but costly.
Best option: Cryogenic insulated dewars (ca. 20 wt
% H2 at 1 bar and -253°C).
Issues: High liquefaction energy, dormant boil off,
and safety.
Solid H2 Storage:
Status: Very early development (many R
questions).
Best options: Too early to determine. Many
potential options: Rechargeable hydrides, chemical
hydrides (H2O thermally reactive), carbon, and
other high surface area materials. Most-developed
option: Metal hydrides (potential for > 8 wt.% H2
and > 90 kg/m3 H2-storage capacities at 10-60
bar).
Issues: Weight, lower desorption temperatures,
higher desorption kinetics, recharge time and
pressure, heat management, cost, pyrophoricity,
cyclic life, container compatibility and
optimisation.