crystals

Article
Experimental Study of Thermomechanical Processes:
Laser Welding and Melting of a Powder Bed
Yassine Saadlaoui *, Julien Sijobert , Maria Doubenskaia, Philippe Bertrand, Eric Feulvarch
and Jean-Michel Bergheau
University of Lyon, ENISE, LTDS UMR 5513 CNRS, 58 rue Jean Parot, 42023 Saint-Etienne CEDEX 02, France;
julien.sijobert@enise.fr (J.S.); maria.doubenskaia@enise.fr (M.D.); philippe.bertrand@enise.fr (P.B.);
eric.feulvarch@enise.fr (E.F.); jean-michel.bergheau@enise.fr (J.-M.B.)
* Correspondence: yassine.saadlaoui@enise.fr




Received: 4 March 2020; Accepted: 23 March 2020; Published: 26 March 2020


Abstract: In this study, an experimental approach was developed to analyze and better understand the
laser welding and melting of a powder bed process. Different optical diagnostics tools (high-speed
camera, infrared camera, pyrometer, etc.) were applied to measure different physical quantities
(molten pool morphology, temperature field, residual stresses, and distortions). As a result,
measurements during the laser welding process facilitated the building of a database of experimental
results (experimental benchmarks). The study of the melting of a powder bed enabled a better
understanding of the physics related to the formation and behavior of the molten pool. These results
can be used by researchers to improve and validate numerical simulations of these processes.

Keywords: melting of a powder bed; laser welding; optical diagnostics; molten pool; temperature field;
residual stresses

1. Introduction
The laser welding process is used widely in international industry. It involves using a laser
to assemble various metals (carbon steels, stainless steels, aluminum, and titanium). A laser is a
concentrated heat source that can provide a tight and deep weld bead. This process has different
advantages over other welding processes: the absence of chamfers and filler material, a high welding
speed, a controlled welding depth, a small thermal affected zone, and a low deformation of welded
parts. Recently, additive manufacturing processes have begun to occupy an increasingly important
place in the industrial world, especially those based on the melting of a powder bed. They consist
of producing parts through layer by layer deposition and selective melting of powder layers using
a laser. During the melting of a powder bed, different materials can be used: metals, polymers,
and ceramics. Metals are by far the most used materials in different industrial environments such as
medical, aerospace, automotive, and power.
The laser welding and especially the melting of a powder bed require continuous studying
to improve their performance. The experimental approach is often used to study and analyze
these thermomechanical processes [1–8]. These studies can be very expensive considering that the
processes parameters are numerous [9,10]. In this context, numerical simulation can be an alternative
solution. It facilitates the optimization of these parameters and predicting the final characteristics of
manufactured parts for a reasonable cost and time.
During the numerical simulation of these thermomechanical processes, several physical
phenomena must be considered. These phenomena include the formation of the molten pool,
heat transfers, metallurgical transformation, residual stresses, and distortions. Depending on the
aims targeted by the simulation, some physical phenomena can be neglected [11]. For example,

Crystals 2020, 10, 246; doi:10.3390/cryst10040246 www.mdpi.com/journal/crystals

Crystals 2020, 10, 246 2 of 20

during numerical modeling that focuses on the formation of the molten pool (thermo-fluid simulation),
the mechanical computation (residual stresses and distortions computation) is often overlooked [12–15].
Thermomechanical simulation is generally used to estimate residual stresses and distortions,
thus providing very useful information for fatigue lifetime predictions. The thermal computation of
this type of simulation is often simplified (the formation of the molten pool is neglected) to reduce
the computation time [16–24]. Some studies have attempted to consider most of these physical
phenomena. For example, Saadlaoui et al. [25] developed a new strategy to simulate the interaction
between the fluid flow in the molten pool and the deformations in the base metal. Therefore, their
strategy enables the provision, at the same time, of thermal, fluid, and mechanical results (thermal
cycle, molten pool morphology, fluid flow, residual stresses, and deformations). As mentioned above,
the numerical simulation can be a useful solution in studying these processes for a reasonable cost
and time. However, the numerical simulation is based on different assumptions [11]. For this, a step
of validating the numerical models may be necessary. It involves testing the efficiency and reliability
of the simulation using experimental or numerical benchmarks. Frequently, researchers prefer to
validate their modeling using numerical benchmarks. That is mostly because of the reasonable cost
and the accessibility of these benchmarks (contrarily to experimental benchmarks). Here, the problem
is that these numerical benchmarks are often simple academic simulations. For example, the sloshing
problem was used by Saadlaoui et al. [15] to validate the fluid formulation of the molten pool formation
during the laser welding process. It involves tracking the oscillations of a liquid in a container [26].
Therefore, these benchmarks cannot be directly used to validate the results of a laser welding simulation.
In this context, several experimental measurements were developed to study and to build a database
(experimental benchmarks) of thermomechanical processes [27–32]. These experimental benchmarks
can clearly be used to improve and validate numerical simulations.
Some experimental studies have examined the formation of a molten pool during laser welding
and the melting of powder bed processes [10,30,33–35]. They have enabled the measuring of the
molten pool morphology. This may assist in validating the thermo-fluid simulation of these processes.
Gao et al. [36] studied the formation of a molten pool and the keyhole during ND: YAG laser welding
of stainless steel. They applied a coaxial visual sensing system to record images of the molten pool.
The same system was used by Kim et al. [29] to observe the morphology of the molten pool and keyhole
during a remote laser welding. The effect of the welding speed on the molten pool morphology during
a high-power laser welding was studied by Li et al. [37]. Lei et al. [32] used a high-speed camera
synchronized with an auxiliary laser light to study the effect of laser welding parameters on the molten
pool morphology. The same system was used by Trapp et al. [10] to follow the formation of the molten
pool during the melting of a powder bed. These authors and others have studied only the formation of
the molten pool. In addition, the molten pool images of these studies (especially for the melting of a
powder bed) are not always of sufficient quality to determine the molten pool morphology [10,38–42].
Therefore, these studies cannot be used to validate a complete simulation (thermo-fluid-mechanical
simulation) of thermomechanical processes. Indeed, information on the temperature field and the
residual stresses distribution may be necessary for such validation. These physical quantities were
measured separately by some studies [27,31]. Finding an experimental study that measured the molten
pool morphology, the temperature field, the residual stresses, and the distortions at the same time is
very rare.
In this paper, an experimental approach is proposed to study laser welding. It involves instrumenting
this process to measure different physical quantities (molten pool morphology, temperature field, residual
stresses, and distortions). These quantities can be used to build a database (experimental benchmark) to
validate the numerical simulation of this process. In addition, the formation of the molten pool during the
melting of a powder bed process was also studied using the same experimental approach. Here, the aim
was to analyze and understand this recent process better.
Crystals 2020, 10, 246 3 of 20

The paper is organized as follows:

• in Section 2, the proposed experimental setup is presented.

• in Section 3, the methodologies used during the laser welding and the melting of a powder bed
are detailed.
• in Section 4, the results of the study of these processes are illustrated and discussed.

2. Experiment Setup
2.1. Proposed Approach
A specific experimental setup (Figure 1) was designed and realized using different instrumentation
tools (high-speed camera, infrared camera, etc.).
For laser welding by conduction, the numerical simulation is well advanced and controlled.
It enables the consideration of the physical phenomena during this process [11,14,15,43]. For this,
the main objective of welding measurements is to acquire the necessary results to validate the numerical
simulation of this process. However, obtaining results of all physical quantities using the experimental
approach is not always easy. Hence, we will focus on the weld pool morphology, the temperature field,
residual stresses, and distortions.
Contrary to laser welding, the numerical simulation of the melting of a powder bed is not
sufficiently advanced [44–47]. Thus, the first interest of the experimental study was to understand
the physical phenomena involved better. This can help to improve the numerical simulation of this
process. We note that the same experimental setup was used to study both processes (laser welding
and melting of a powder bed).

Figure 1. Experiment setup: 1—High-speed camera; 2—Infrared camera; 3—Laser fiber; 4—Laser head;
5—Pyrometer; 6—Auxiliary laser light; 7—Samples support.
Crystals 2020, 10, 246 4 of 20

2.2. Experimental Equipment and Samples

2.2.1. Machine and Laser
A TRUMPF LASMA 1054 CNC machine (3 axis) was used (Figure 1). A PRECITEC YC52 laser
head was powered by a LASERLINE LDM 3000-60 diode laser with a theoretical power of 3 kW and a
wavelength of 930 nm. A real laser power equal to 2.5 kW was measured using a wattmeter. The beam
analysis of this laser was carried out for the maximum power (2.5 kW) and the results are given in Figure 2.
This analysis enables us to position the sample in the focal plane. Initially, we decided that
the upper surface of the sample is merged with this plane (Figure 3a). This configuration causes
the formation of a keyhole that is not often considered during numerical simulations [15]. For this
reason, the laser beam was defocused by 5 mm (Figure 3b) to conduct a laser welding by conduction.
This second configuration give a laser beam diameter of 2.4 mm. The energy distributions of the laser
beam of these two configurations are given by Figure 3c,d. The formation of the molten pool during
the two welding configurations is presented in Figure 4.

2.2.2. High-Speed Camera and Auxiliary Laser Light

A Phantom VEO 710 high-speed camera with a resolution of 1280 × 800 pixels was used. With a
maximal rate of 7400 f ps, this camera model is perfect to track the formation of the molten pool.
Phantom Camera Control (PCC) software was used to configure, control, process, and download
images. A filter with a wavelength of 810 nm was installed on the camera lens (NAVITAR ZM 6000-II,
12 mm FF). The camera was also synchronized with an auxiliary laser light (CAVILUX diode laser with
a wavelength of 810 nm and a maximal power of 500 W). This facilitated the capturing of clear images
of the molten pool surface (without the light of the laser power). As shown in Figure 1, the camera was
attached to the laser head to monitor the molten pool movement. The working distance (the distance
between the camera lens and the tip of the power laser) was approximately 100 mm and the tilt angle
of the camera from the vertical was approximately 30◦ . We note that a reference sample was used to
determine the scale of the camera images.

Figure 2. Laser beam analysis for maximal power of 2.5 kW.

Crystals 2020, 10, 246 5 of 20

Figure 3. (a) Focused laser beam; (b) Defocused laser beam of 5 mm; (c) Energy distribution of focused
laser beam; (d) Energy distribution of defocused laser beam.

Figure 4. Two welding configuration (images of high-speed camera): (a) welding by keyhole;
(b) welding by conduction (P = 2.5 KW, v = 600 mm.min−1 ).
Crystals 2020, 10, 246 6 of 20

2.2.3. Infrared Camera and Pyrometer

A FLIR Phoenix MWIR infrared camera with a resolution of 320 × 256 pixels was used to
determine the temperature distribution in the weld bead. As Figure 1 shows, the camera was
attached to the machine table. Its working distance and tilt angle were in the order of 695 mm
and 29◦ , respectively. With this configuration, the camera facilitated the capturing of the temperature
distribution throughout the weld bead. An attenuator filter was installed on the camera lens to capture
temperatures approximately 1600 ◦ C. An integration time of 0.01 ms and acquisition time of 10 µs
were chosen.
We note that the infrared camera was not calibrated, so it could not provide temperature values.
For this, a KLEIBER LVO 25 S-7 monochromatic pyrometer was used to measure the temperature in
the weld bead. It can measure temperatures between 350 and 3500 ◦ C. A specific mounting was used
to install the pyrometer on the laser head (Figure 1). This specific mounting expedited moving the
pyrometer and measuring the temperature in four positions (P1, P2, P3, and P4) on the weld bead
(Figure 5). A working distance of approximately 123 mm and a length of the pyrometer body of 61 mm
enabled the measuring of the temperature with a spot diameter of 0.9 mm. We note that the emissivity
of the material was assumed to be 1. Therefore, the temperature given by the pyrometer was the
brightness temperature.

Figure 5. Measurement points of the pyrometer.

2.2.4. Optical Microscope, DRC Machine, and 3D Measuring Arm

The length and width of the weld pool can be measured using the images of the high-speed camera.
However, to determine its depth and height, the use of another approach is necessary. It involves
making samples by transversely cutting the welded samples. These samples must then undergo a
polishing step. Subsequently, a chemical attack must be conducted to distinguish the different zones:
weld bead, heat affected zone (HAZ), and the base metal. The final step is to visualize the samples
using an optical microscope.
A PROTO DRX machine (with a collimator diameter of 1 mm) was used to measure residual
stresses. The detector uses two orientations, 0◦ and 90◦ , to determine the axial and longitudinal
residual stresses. For each of these two orientations, the scanned angles are −25◦ ; −16.66◦ ; −8.33◦ ; 0◦ ;
8.33◦ ; 16.66◦ , and 25◦ .
Crystals 2020, 10, 246 7 of 20

A FARO GAGE 3D measuring arm (with a precision of 0.025 mm) was used to measure the flatness
of the samples after welding. This measuring enabled us to determine the vertical displacements Uz of
the welded samples (Figure 6).

Figure 6. Vertical displacement Uz of welded sample: transverse plane.

2.2.5. Samples Preparation

For the laser welding, 316L stainless steel plates (austenitic steel) from hot rolling were machined
to obtain nine samples with dimensions of 100 mm × 100 mm × 10 mm. The chemical composition
of this material is given in Table 1. These samples were subjected to a relaxation heat treatment at
610 ◦ C for 2.5 h with slow cooling in a neutral atmosphere (nitrogen). This heat treatment facilitates
the reduction of the residual stresses related to the machining and rolling processes. Thus, this enables
avoiding considering the initial residual stresses during the numerical simulation of the laser welding
process. The first measurement of stresses (after machining of samples and before the heat treatment)
indicated values in the order of 700 MPa while values of approximately 100 MPa were observed after
this heat treatment. Samples in 15CDV6 low alloy steel (bainitic steel) were also machined (with the
same dimensions). The aim here was to study the formation of the weld pool of two materials that do
not have the same thermophysical properties.

Table 1. Chemical composition of 316L stainless steel in percent.

C Mn P S Si Cr Ni Mo N
0.022 1846 0.039 0.0004 0.319 16.97 20.01 2.01 0.0368

The melting of a powder bed involved filling a hollow 316L substrate of dimensions
60 mm × 60 mm × 10 mm (Figure 7) by a layer of 316L powder. Subsequently, the power laser facilitated
the formation of a bead by melting a zone of this layer (thickness of 2 mm). Two types of powder were
examined to study the influence of the size and granulometry of the powder on the formation of the molten
pool: a spherical powder with a diameter between 20 and 50 µm, and another irregular one with a size
between 100 and 150 µm (Figure 8).
Crystals 2020, 10, 246 8 of 20

Figure 7. Preparation of the powder layer.

Figure 8. Granulometry of 316L powder: (a) spherical powder (20–50 µm); (b) irregular powder
(100–150 µm).

3. Methodology
3.1. Laser Welding
Laser welding tests involved creating a bead of length 90 mm on each sample. A maximal power
of laser of approximately 2.5 kW was set. Welding speeds of 600, 1600, and 2600 mm.min−1 were
tested. Three 316L samples were studied for each speed. 15CDV6 samples were also examined to
study the weld pool formation according to the welded material. A comparison of the weld pool
morphology of the two materials (316L and 15CDV6) was conducted.
As noted earlier, the aim here was to create a database (experimental benchmark) that enables
the validating of numerical simulations of laser welding. To achieve this, we were interested in the
weld pool morphology, temperature evolution, residual stresses, and distortions of the 316L samples.
The length and width of the weld pool were measured from the images of the high-speed camera.
However, to determine its depth and height, the approach proposed in Section 2.2.4 must be used.
The infrared camera enabled us to obtain the temperature distribution. At the same time, the pyrometer
Crystals 2020, 10, 246 9 of 20

enabled us to measure the brightness temperature for each color given by the infrared camera (points
P1, P2, P3, and P4: Figure 5). Residual stresses related to the welding process were also measured
at three points (1, 2, and 3) on 316L samples (Figure 9). The welding conditions and measurements
performed for the two materials are given in Table 2.

Figure 9. Measurement points of residual stress.

Table 2. Machine parameters and measured quantities for both materials (316L and 15CDV6).

Material Power [kW] Speed [mm.min−1 ] Molten Pool Morphology Temperature Residual Stresses Distortions
316L 2.5 600, 1600, and 2600 measured measured measured measured
15CDV6 2.5 600, 1600, and 2600 measured not measured not measured not measured

3.2. Melting of a Powder Bed

A single bead of 50 mm length was created by melting a zone of the powder layer. Similar to
laser welding, the maximum power of the laser was used (2.5 kW). Scanning speeds (speed of laser
movement) between 400 and 3600 mm.min−1 were examined. Three beads were created for each speed.

4. Results and Discussion

In this section, the results of the laser welding process (molten pool morphology, temperature
field, residual stresses, and distortions) are given and discussed. The authors are interested in the
effect of the welding speed on these results. The results (formation of the molten pool) of the melting
of a powder bed are then presented.

4.1. Laser Welding

4.1.1. Weld Pool Morphology

Figure 10 shows the microscopic images of a cross-section of 316L and 15CDV6 weld beads for a
speed of 1600 mm.min−1 . These images enable us to determine the depth, height, and width of the
weld bead. The length of the molten pool can be measured from images of the high-speed camera
(the width can also be measured from these images: Figure 11). Tables 3 and 4 illustrate respectively
the dimensions of the 316L and 15CDV6 weld beads for three speeds (600, 1600 and 2600 mm.min−1 ).
Figure 12 shows the high-speed camera images of the weld pool of the two materials for a welding
speed equal to 1600 mm.min−1 .
Crystals 2020, 10, 246 10 of 20

Figure 10. Cross-section of the weld bead (microscopic images, v = 1600 mm.min−1 ): (a) 316L;
(b) 15CDV6.

Figure 11. Morphology of the weld pool (316L): 1600 mm.min−1 .

Figure 12. Morphology of the weld pools of both materials (1600 mm.min−1 ): (a) 316L; (b) 15CDV6.
Crystals 2020, 10, 246 11 of 20

Table 3. Morphology of the weld pool (316L).

Speed [mm.min−1 ] L [mm] W [mm] D [mm] H [mm]

600 2.85 ± 0.2 2.97 ± 0.1 2.12 ± 0.1 0.31 ± 0.02
1600 2.98 ± 0.2 2.78 ± 0.1 1.29 ± 0.1 0.15 ± 0.02
2600 3.1 ± 0.2 2.6 ± 0.1 0.99 ± 0.1 0.12 ± 0.02

Table 4. Morphology of the weld pool (15CDV6).

Speed [mm.min−1 ] L [mm] W [mm] D [mm] H [mm]

600 5.27 ± 0.2 2.82 ± 0.1 2.14 ± 0.1 0.25 ± 0.02
1600 5.56 ± 0.2 2.15 ± 0.1 1.16 ± 0.1 0.1 ± 0.02
2600 5.9 ± 0.2 2.06 ± 0.1 0.95 ± 0.1 0.09 ± 0.02

The images captured by the optical microscope and the high-speed camera enabled us to build a
database of 316L (Table 3) and 15CDV6 (Table 4) weld pool morphologies. Tables 3 and 4 indicate a
significant effect of the welding speed on the weld pool morphology. As expected, the weld pool is
longer and shallower for the speed of 2600 mm.min−1 . In Figure 12, the weld pool, HAZ, and base
metal can be clearly distinguished. Because 316L steel is austenitic, it does not undergo a major
metallurgical transformation during welding (not HAZ). However, the HAZ is very remarkable for
the 15CDV6 material (bainitic steel). Figure 12 also shows that the weld pool morphology is sensitive
to the welded material. For example, using the same welding conditions, the 15CDV6 weld pool is
longer compared to the 316L weld pool (Tables 3 and 4). This may be justified by the fact that the two
materials do not have the same thermophysical properties (thermal conductivity, viscosity, surface
tension, etc.).

4.1.2. Temperature Field

The temperature distribution during the laser welding of the 316L samples is shown in Figure 13.
We note that an arbitrary unit (A.U.) was used in Figure 13 because the infrared camera was not
calibrated (the scale does not represent temperature values). Figure 14 illustrates the evolution of
the brightness temperature in the melted zone according to welding speed. The evolution of this
temperature in different positions of the weld bead is given in Figure 15 (v = 1600 mm.min−1 ).
The images of the temperature distribution captured by the infrared camera (Figure 13) show
that the welding speed affects the isotherms distribution (and thus the morphology of the weld pool).
The pyrometer enabled us to determine the brightness temperature values (Figure 15) corresponding
to the different colors captured by the infrared camera. This brightness temperature in the weld pool is
not very sensitive to the welding speed (Figure 14).
We note that the true temperature restoration is the key problem of pyrometry because of the
unknown emissivity and its possible variation during measurement. Different methods can be applied
but no universal solution is found [27,31]. The brightness temperature of a non-blackbody target is defined
as the temperature of a blackbody with the same monochromatic luminance. The relation between the
two temperatures is presented in [48]. The true temperature can be measured during a future work by
using other experimental approaches (bichromatic pyrometer, thermocouple, etc.).
Crystals 2020, 10, 246 12 of 20

Figure 13. Temperature field given by infrared camera (316L): (a) v = 600 mm.min−1 ;
(b) v = 1600 mm.min−1 ; (c) v = 2600 mm.min−1 .

Figure 14. Effect of the welding speed on the brightness temperature evolution (316L).
Crystals 2020, 10, 246 13 of 20

Figure 15. Measurement of the brightness temperature in different positions on the weld bead for
v = 1600 mm.min−1 : P1, P2, P3, and P4 (316L).

4.1.3. Residual Stresses and Distortions

Axial and longitudinal residual stresses were measured on the 316L samples after welding using
the DRX machine. As Figure 9 shows, three measurement points were chosen. We specify that the first
point is tangent to the weld bead. Table 5 summarizes the results of these stresses for speeds of 600,
1600, and 2600 mm.min−1 .
The vertical displacements of the welded samples were measured using the measuring arm.
Vertical displacements of Uz of 0.411, 0.174, and 0.091 mm were measured respectively for the welding
speeds of 600, 1600, and 2600 mm.min−1 .

Table 5. Residual stresses of 316L samples (points 1, 2, and 3) after welding.

Stresses [MPa] (φ = 0◦ ) Stresses [MPa] (φ = 90◦ )

Speed [mm.min−1 ] Point 1 Point 2 Point 3 Point 1 Point 2 Point 3
600 688 ± 30 359 ± 11 69 ± 19 −18 ± 30 312 ± 62 323 ± 14
1600 591 ± 25 151 ± 12 73 ± 20 259 ± 30 545 ± 62 405 ± 14
2600 343 ± 22 99 ± 30 75 ± 12 249 ± 30 507 ± 17 278 ± 13

Residual stresses in the order of 100 MPa were observed before the welding of the 316L
samples. These stresses increased after welding to reach approximately 688 MPa for a speed of
600 mm.min−1 . This indicates that the residual stresses related to the laser welding process can be very
important. As shown in Table 5, these stresses are very sensitive to the welding speed. For example,
the longitudinal residual stresses decrease when the speed increases. The vertical displacements also
decrease when the welding speed increases (Uz = 0.411 for v = 600 mm.min−1 and Uz = 0.091 for
v = 2600 mm.min−1 ). This can be justified by the effect of the welding speed on the molten pool
morphology and thermal cycle.
The results of the laser welding process enabled us to conduct an experimental benchmark (molten
pool morphology, temperature field, residual stresses, and distortions). This benchmark can assist
in validating the different types of numerical simulations of this process. For example, the molten
pool morphology and temperature field results can be used to validate thermo-fluid simulations.
The molten pool morphology and especially the free surface shape can also indicate that the tension
surface gradient is positive (for used welding conditions). The mechanical results of the numerical
simulation can be validated using the residual stresses and distortion results.
Crystals 2020, 10, 246 14 of 20

4.2. Morphology of the Molten Pool: Melting of a Powder Bed

Figure 16 shows the formation of the molten pool during the melting of the spherical powder.
The effect of the scanning speed on the molten pool morphology is given in Figures 17 and 18.
The influence of the types of powder on the formation of the molten pool is presented in Figures 19
and 20. Tables 6 and 7 summarize the dimensions of the respective beads of the spherical and
irregular powders.

Figure 16. Formation of the molten pool during melting of a 316L spherical powder bed
(v = 1600 mm.min−1 ).

Figure 17. Effect of scanning speed on molten pool morphology (spherical powder): high-speed
camera images.
Crystals 2020, 10, 246 15 of 20

Figure 18. Effect of scanning speed on molten pool morphology (spherical powder): infrared
camera images.

Figure 19. Effect of powder distribution on molten pool morphology (high-speed camera images,
v = 400 mm.min−1 ): (a) Spherical powder; (b) Irregular powder.

Figure 20. Molten pool morphology (microscopic images, v = 400 mm.min−1 ): (a) Spherical powder;
(b) Irregular powder.
Crystals 2020, 10, 246 16 of 20

Table 6. Molten pool morphology of spherical powder (20–50 µm).

Speed [mm.min−1 ] W 1 [mm] W 2 [mm] D [mm] H [mm]

400 3.93 ± 0.1 3.17 ± 0.1 1.86 ± 0.1 2.47 ± 0.1
600 3.91 ± 0.1 2.96 ± 0.1 1.61 ± 0.1 2.24 ± 0.1
800 3.53 ± 0.1 2.83 ± 0.1 1.39 ± 0.1 2.22 ± 0.1
1000 3.25 ± 0.1 2.62 ± 0.1 1.3 ± 0.1 2.05 ± 0.1
1200 3 ± 0.1 2.41 ± 0.1 1.09 ± 0.1 1.88 ± 0.1
1400 2.8 ± 0.1 2.21 ± 0.1 1.01 ± 0.1 1.82 ± 0.1

Table 7. Molten pool morphology of irregular powder (100–150 µm).

Speed [mm.min−1 ] W 1 [mm] W 2 [mm] D [mm] H [mm]

400 3.77 ± 0.1 3.77 ± 0.1 2.42 ± 0.1 1.99 ± 0.1
600 3.46 ± 0.1 3.46 ± 0.1 1.97 ± 0.1 1.7 ± 0.1
800 3.23 ± 0.1 3.23 ± 0.1 1.7 ± 0.1 1.63 ± 0.1

Figure 16 shows the formation of the molten pool during the melting of a spherical powder
layer. In this figure, the molten pool, the bead (consolidated material), and the unfused powder can be
distinguished. A denuded zone can also be distinguished; it appears between the bead and the unfused
powder. The videos captured by the high-speed camera can explain the causes of the appearance of
this zone. Indeed, the molten pool absorbs the powder around it. This absorption can be justified by
the mechanical flow of the powder which moves it towards the molten pool. This flow is probably less
important for low layer thicknesses.
Figure 17 shows the effect of the scanning speed on the formation of the molten pool. The latter
is longer and narrower for the higher velocities. The "balling" phenomenon appears from a speed
of 3600 mm.min−1 (Figures 17 and 18). Figure 19 shows the molten pool formation of both types of
powder (spherical and irregular powders). We note that the type of powder has a direct effect on
the formation and morphology of the bead. This can be justified by the influence of the size and the
granulometry of the powder on its mechanical flow. A standardized flowability test (ASTM) was used
to measure the rate of this flow. It involves timing the flow of 50 g of powder through a hole with a
diameter of 2.54 mm. The spherical powder flowed after 16 seconds while 38 seconds was required for
the flow of the irregular powder. These results confirm that the flowability of the spherical powder is
greater than that of the irregular powder.
The cross-section of the beads of the spherical and irregular powders are given in Figure 20.
We observed that the morphology of the bead is sensitive to the types of powder. For example,
gaps of 12 and 24% were observed respectively for the width (L1) and height (H) for the speed of
600 mm.min−1 . This difference can also be justified by the flowability of the two powders. We have
observed that the height of the spherical powder bead is greater than the initial thickness of the powder
layer (2 mm) for speeds of 400, 600, 800, and 1000 mm.min−1 . This can be explained by the flowability
of the spherical powder which facilitates its absorption by the molten pool. This absorption facilitates
the increase in the volume of the bead. For these velocities, the phenomenon of shrinkage of the layer
powder (shrinkage related to the variation of the density between the powder bed and the molten
pool) is, therefore, less visible. However, it begins to be observed from a speed of 1200 mm.min−1 .
Indeed, the powder quantity absorbed is less important for high velocities. The flowability of the
irregular powder and therefore its absorption by the molten pool are less important. For this reason,
the height (H) of the irregular powder bead is less than 2 mm, even for low velocities.
The study of the melting of a powder bed enabled us to analyze and understand this process
better. As the first remark, we have observed that the molten pool absorbs the unfused powder around
it. This phenomenon was very visible especially for the spherical powder, which has a significant
flowability. The absorption of the powder by the molten pool leads to the formation of a denuded zone
between the bead and the unfused powder. It also facilitates the increase in the bead volume, especially
for the spherical powder and at low velocities. Therefore, the shrinkage phenomenon simulated by
several studies [46,49] cannot always occur during the melting of a powder bed. However, considering
Crystals 2020, 10, 246 17 of 20

the material addition (related to the mechanical flow of the powder around the molten pool) during
the numerical simulation may be necessary according to manufacturing conditions. Considering the
fluid flows in the molten pool (related to the absorption of the powder by the molten pool) will also be
necessary. The formation of an interface between the molten zone and the unfused powder can also
be simulated.

5. Conclusions
An experimental setup was proposed to study the laser welding and melting of powder bed
processes. The first aim of this setup was to analyze and understand these two processes better.
The second aim was to build an experimental database (experimental benchmark) to validate the
different types of numerical simulations of laser welding. The study involved instrumenting a
laser welding machine to measure different quantities (molten pool morphology, temperature field,
residual stresses, and distortions). Different instrumentation tools (high-speed camera, infrared camera,
pyrometer, etc.) were used to achieve this.
In the first step, tests of laser welding were carried out on 316L samples. The effect of the welding
speed on the molten pool morphology, temperature field, residual stresses, and distortions was studied.
The measured quantities were very sensitive to this speed. For example, the weld pool was longer
and shallower for high velocities. The longitudinal residual stresses and distortions decreased when
the speed increased. The results of these different quantities will enable researchers to validate their
numerical simulations of this process.
In the second step, tests of the melting of a powder bed were carried out using a laser welding
machine. The idea was to fill a hollow substrate with a powder layer and then melt it using a laser.
The aim of these tests was to understand this process better. As a result, the bead dimensions of two
types of powder (spherical and irregular powders) were measured. These results, and especially the
height of the bead, depicted that the shrinkage of the powder layer after melting cannot always be
visible. Indeed, the height of the bead of the spherical powder exceeded the initial thickness of the
powder layer for low velocities. This can be explained by the high-speed camera videos. They indicated
that the molten pool absorbed the powder around it. This absorption facilitates the increase in the bead
volume and creating a denuded zone between the bead and the unfused powder. The shrinkage of the
powder layer was easily visualized with the irregular powder even for low scanning velocities. This can
be explained by its low flowability, which delays its absorption by the molten pool (less material
addition). The results also indicated that the bead morphology is sensitive to scanning velocities.
Finally, this study enabled us to understand the physics during laser welding and especially
during the melting of a powder bed process better. It also enabled us to build a database of experimental
results (experimental benchmark) of laser welding. This can assist in improving and validating the
numerical simulation of these processes.

Author Contributions: Conceptualization, Y.S., J.S. and J.-M.B.; methodology, Y.S., M.D., E.F. and J.-M.B.; software,
Y.S. and J.S.; validation, Y.S., M.D., E.F. and J.-M.B.; formal analysis, Y.S., J.S. and J.-M.B.; investigation, Y.S.;
resources, P.B., E.F. and J.-M.B.; data curation, Y.S. and J.S.; writing–original draft preparation, Y.S.; writing–review
and editing, J.S., M.D., P.B. and J.-M.B.; visualization, Y.S., P.B. and J.-M.B.; supervision, J.S., M.D. and J.-M.B.;
project administration, J.-M.B.; funding acquisition, P.B., E.F. and J.-M.B. All authors have read and agreed to the
published version of the manuscript.
Funding: This research received no external funding.
Acknowledgments: The authors would like to thank ESI-GROUP and MELTED project for funding this study.
Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References
1. Liu, Q.S.; Mahdavian, S.; Aswin, D.; Ding, S. Experimental study of temperature and clamping force during
Nd:YAG laser butt welding. Opt. Laser Technol. 2009, 41, 794–799. [CrossRef]
Crystals 2020, 10, 246 18 of 20

2. Li, L.; Peng, G.; Wang, J.; Gong, J.; Li, H. Experimental study on weld formation of Inconel 718 with fiber
laser welding under reduced ambient pressure. Vacuum 2018, 151, 140–147. [CrossRef]
3. Pankaj, P.; Tiwari, A.; Bhadra, R.; Biswas, P. Experimental investigation on CO2 laser butt welding of AISI
304 stainless steel and mild steel thin sheets. Opt. Laser Technol. 2019, 119, 105633. [CrossRef]
4. Li, J.; Sun, Q.; Kang, K.; Zhen, Z.; Liu, Y.; Feng, J. Process stability and parameters optimization of narrow-gap
laser vertical welding with hot wire for thick stainless steel in nuclear power plant. Opt. Laser Technol. 2019,
123, 105921. [CrossRef]
5. Pal, S.; Lojen, G.; Kokol, V.; Drstvenšek, I. Reducing porosity at the starting layers above supporting bars of
the parts made by Selective Laser Melting. Powder Technol. 2019, 355, 268–277. [CrossRef]
6. Zhang, B.; Xiu, M.; Tan, Y.T.; Wei, J.; Wang, P. Pitting corrosion of SLM Inconel 718 sample under surface and
heat treatments. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2019, 490, 556–567. [CrossRef]
7. Gao, X.; Liu, Z.; Li, J.; Liu, E.; Yue, C.; Zhao, K.; Yang, G. Selective laser melting of CuZr-based metallic glass
composites. Mater. Lett. 2020, 259, 126724. [CrossRef]
8. Chen, H.; Zi, X.; Han, Y.; Dong, J.; Liu, S.; Chen, C. Microstructure and mechanical properties of additive
manufactured W-Ni-Fe-Co composite produced by selective laser melting. Int. J. Refract. Met. Hard Mater.
2020, 86, 105111. [CrossRef]
9. Sun, J.; Yang, Y.; Wang, D. Parametric optimization of selective laser melting for forming Ti6Al4V samples
by Taguchi method. Opt. Laser Technol. 2013, 49, 118–124. [CrossRef]
10. Trapp, J.; Rubenchik, A.M.; Guss, G.; Matthews, M.J. In situ absorptivity measurements of metallic powders
during laser powder-bed fusion additive manufacturing. Appl. Mater. Today 2017, 9, 341–349. [CrossRef]
11. Dal, M.; Fabbro, R. [INVITED] An overview of the state of art in laser welding simulation. Opt. Laser Technol.
2016, 78, 2–14. [CrossRef]
12. Ko, S.H.; Yoo, C.D.; Farson, D.F.; Choi, S.K. Mathematical modeling of the dynamic behavior of gas tungsten
arc weld pools. Metall. Mater. Trans. B 2000, 31, 1465–1473. [CrossRef]
13. Khairallah, S.; Anderson, A.; Rubenchik, A. Laser powder-bed fusion additive manufacturing: Effects of
main physical processes on dynamical melt flow and pore formation from mesoscopic powder simulation.
Acta Mater. 2015.
14. Saadlaoui, Y.; Sallem, H.; Feulvarch, E.; Sayet, T.; Leblond, J.b.; Bergheau, J.M. Influence des écoulements de
la matière sur l’évolution des contraintes résiduelles durant le procédé de soudage. In Proceedings of the
13e Colloque National en Calcul des Structures CSMA 2017, Giens, Var, France, 15–19 May 2017.
15. Saadlaoui, Y.; Feulvarch, E.; Delache, A.; Leblond, J.B.; Bergheau, J.M. A new strategy for the numerical
modeling of a weld pool. C. R. Méc. 2018, 346, 999–1017. [CrossRef]
16. Duranton, P.; Devaux, J.; Robin, V.; Gilles, P.; Bergheau, J.M. 3D modelling of multipass welding of a 316L
stainless steel pipe. J. Mater. Proces. Technol. 2004, 153–154, 457–463. [CrossRef]
17. Zain-ul Abdein, M.; Nelias, D.; Jullien, J.F.; Deloison, D. Prediction of laser beam welding-induced distortions
and residual stresses by numerical simulation for aeronautic application. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2009,
209, 2907–2917. [CrossRef]
18. Feulvarch, E.; Robin, V.; Bergheau, J.M. Thermometallurgical and mechanical modelling of welding—Application
to multipass dissimilar metal girth welds. Sci. Technol. Weld. Join. 2011, 16, 221–231. [CrossRef]
19. Anca, A.; Cardona, A.; Risso, J.; Fachinotti, V.D. Finite element modeling of welding processes.
Appl. Math. Model. 2011, 35, 688–707. [CrossRef]
20. Portelette, L.; Roux, J.C.; Robin, V.; Feulvarch, E. A Gaussian surrogate model for residual stresses induced
by orbital multi-pass TIG welding. Comput. Struct. 2017, 183, 27–37. [CrossRef]
21. Tsirkas, S.; Papanikos, P.; Pericleous, K.; Strusevich, N.; Boitout, F.; Bergheau, J.M. Evaluation of distortions
in laser welded shipbuilding parts using local-global finite element approach. Sci. Technol. Weld. Join. 2003,
8, 79–88. [CrossRef]
22. Lacki, P.; Adamus, K. Numerical simulation of the electron beam welding process. Comput. Struct. 2011,
89, 977–985. [CrossRef]
23. Piekarska, W.; Kubiak, M. Modeling of thermal phenomena in single laser beam and laser-arc hybrid
welding processes using projection method. Appl. Math. Model. 2013, 37, 2051–2062. [CrossRef]
24. Caprace, J.D.; Fu, G.; Carrara, J.F.; Remes, H.; Shin, S.B. A benchmark study of uncertainness in welding
simulation. Mar. Struct. 2017, 56, 69–84. [CrossRef]
Crystals 2020, 10, 246 19 of 20

25. Saadlaoui, Y.; Delache, A.; Feulvarch, E.; Leblond, J.B.; Bergheau, J.M. New strategy of solid/fuid coupling
during numerical simulation of welding process. J. Fluids Struct. 2020, submitted for publication.
26. Ramaswamy, B. Numerical simulation of unsteady viscous free-surface flow. J. Comput. Phys. 1990, 87, 495.
[CrossRef]
27. Smurov, I.; Doubenskaia, M.; Grigoriev, S. Optical Monitoring in Laser Cladding of Ti6Al4V. J. Therm.
Spray Technol. 2012, 21, 1357–1362. [CrossRef]
28. Doubenskaia, M.; Smurov, I.; Grigoriev, S. Optical Monitoring in Elaboration of Metal Matrix Composites by
Direct Metal Deposition. Phys. Procedia 2012, 39, 767–775. [CrossRef]
29. Kim, C.H.; Ahn, D.C. Coaxial monitoring of keyhole during Yb:YAG laser welding. Opt. Laser Technol. 2012,
44, 1874–1880. [CrossRef]
30. You, Y.; Gao, X.D.; Katayama, S. Review of laser welding monitoring. Sci. Technol. Weld. Join. 2014,
19, 181–201. [CrossRef]
31. Doubenskaia, M.A.; Zhirnov, I.V.; Teleshevskiy, V.I.; Bertrand, P.; Smurov, I.Y. Determination of True
Temperature in Selective Laser Melting of Metal Powder Using Infrared Camera. MSF 2015, 834, 93–102.
[CrossRef]
32. Lei, T.; Rong, Y.; Xu, J.; Huang, Y. Experiment study and regression analysis of molten pool in laser welding.
Opt. Laser Technol. 2018, 108, 534–541. [CrossRef]
33. Clijsters, S.; Craeghs, T.; Buls, S.; Kempen, K.; Kruth, J.-P. In situ quality control of the selective laser melting
process using a high-speed, real-time melt pool monitoring system. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2014,
75, 1089–1101. [CrossRef]
34. Doubenskaia, M.; Kotoban, D.; Zhirnov, I. Study of oxygen effect on the melting pool temperature during
selective laser melting. Mech. Ind. 2016, 17, 707. [CrossRef]
35. Hooper, P.A. Melt pool temperature and cooling rates in laser powder bed fusion. Addit. Manuf. 2018,
22, 548–559. [CrossRef]
36. Gao, J.Q.; Qin, G.L.; Yang, J.L.; He, J.G.; Zhang, T.; Wu, C.S. Image processing of weld pool and keyhole in
Nd:YAG laser welding of stainless steel based on visual sensing. Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China 2011,
21, 423–428. [CrossRef]
37. Li, S.; Chen, G.; Zhou, C. Effects of welding parameters on weld geometry during high-power laser welding
of thick plate. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2015, 79, 177–182. [CrossRef]
38. Gao, X.; You, D.; Katayama, S. Infrared image recognition for seam tracking monitoring during fiber laser
welding. Mechatronics 2012, 22, 370–380. [CrossRef]
39. Gao, X.; Zhang, Y. Monitoring of welding status by molten pool morphology during high-power disk laser
welding. Opt. Int. J. Light Electron Opt. 2015, 126, 1797–1802. [CrossRef]
40. Zhang, Y.; Zhang, C.; Tan, L.; Li, S. Coaxial monitoring of the fibre laser lap welding of Zn-coated steel
sheets using an auxiliary illuminant. Opt. Laser Technol. 2013, 50, 167–175. [CrossRef]
41. Li, L.; Peng, G.; Wang, J.; Gong, J.; Meng, S. Numerical and experimental study on keyhole and melt flow
dynamics during laser welding of aluminium alloys under subatmospheric pressures. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf.
2019, 133, 812–826. [CrossRef]
42. Yin, J.; Wang, D.; Yang, L.; Wei, H.; Dong, P.; Ke, L.; Wang, G.; Zhu, H.; Zeng, X. Correlation between forming
quality and spatter dynamics in laser powder bed fusion. Addit. Manuf. 2020, 31, 100958. [CrossRef]
43. Saadlaoui, Y.; Feulvarch, E.; Delache, A.; Leblond, J.B. Apragmatic strategy for the numerical simulation
of the fluid flow during welding processes. In Proceedings of the CILAMCE 2018 Congress—XXXIX
Ibero-Latin American Congress on Computational Methods in Engineering, Paris/Compiegne, France,
11–14 November 2018.
44. Körner, C.; Attar, E.; Heinl, P. Mesoscopic simulation of selective beam melting processes. J. Mater.
Process. Technol. 2011, 211, 978–987. [CrossRef]
45. Gan, Z.; Yu, G.; He, X.; Li, S. Numerical simulation of thermal behavior and multicomponent mass transfer
in direct laser deposition of Co-base alloy on steel. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 2017, 104, 28–38. [CrossRef]
46. Chen, Q.; Guillemot, G.; Gandin, C.A.; Bellet, M. Three-dimensional finite element thermomechanical
modeling of additive manufacturing by selective laser melting for ceramic materials. Addit. Manuf. 2017,
16, 124–137. [CrossRef]
47. Cook, P.; Murphy, A. Simulation of melt pool behaviour during additive manufacturing: Underlying physics
and progress. Addit. Manuf. 2020, 31, 100909. [CrossRef]
Crystals 2020, 10, 246 20 of 20

48. Smurov, I.; Doubenskaia, M. Temperature Monitoring by Optical Methods in Laser Processing.
In Laser-Assisted Fabrication of Materials; Majumdar, J.D., Manna, I., Eds.; Series Title: Springer Series
in Materials Science; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2013; Volume 161, pp. 375–422.
49. Saadlaoui, Y.; Feulvarch, E.; Delache, A.; Leblond, J.B.; Bergheau, J.M. Simulation Numérique des Procédés
Thermomécaniques dans une Approche Couplant les Écoulements du Fluide avec les Déformations du
Solide: Application au Sudage Laser et à la Fusion d’un lit de Poudre. Ph.D. Thesis, Université de Lyon,
Saint Etienne, Frane, 2019.

© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access
article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution
(CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).